Scribd
Upload
99 views5 pages

22.38: Problem Set #1 Solutions

This document contains solutions to 3 problems from a problem set. Problem 1 provides a fault tree analysis for factors that could lead to death during a flooding event. It lists 14 minimal cut sets that could each result in death. Problem 2 is left blank. Problem 3 discusses how having redundant support systems for two trains still allows for common-cause failures between the trains due to manufacturing defects, environmental conditions, fuel issues, or maintenance errors.

Uploaded by

Jitesh Chavda
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
99 views5 pages

22.38: Problem Set #1 Solutions

This document contains solutions to 3 problems from a problem set. Problem 1 provides a fault tree analysis for factors that could lead to death during a flooding event. It lists 14 minimal cut sets that could each result in death. Problem 2 is left blank. Problem 3 discusses how having redundant support systems for two trains still allows for common-cause failures between the trains due to manufacturing defects, environmental conditions, fuel issues, or maintenance errors.

Uploaded by

Jitesh Chavda
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 5

22.

38: Problem Set #1 Solutions

Problem 1: (see previous page for fault tree)


Factors omitted in tree analysis:
trust in evacuation notice importance
busses available and operable that arent being used
Total population of city
Wealth, education, location
Physical capabilities
Preparations
Occupation
Storm characteristics
Levee characteristics
Shipping locations and security
Air temperature
Also, other forms of death having frequency amplified by flooding:
illness
murder
untreated accidental injury
fall from height
hypothermia
snake/alligator/dog attack

Problem 1, continued:
Minimal Cut Sets:
Any Binary Combination of A and B:
A:
Levee break due to human action
Levee break due to normal operation
Levee break due to wind load
Excessive rain erosion
Human action erosion
Leak erosion
Overtopping erosion
Dam-failure
Rain erosion
Storm surge
B:
Assigned AND abandoned
Imprisoned AND abandoned
Sick AND abandoned
Child AND abandoned
Injured driver AND abandoned
No-license/knowledge driver AND abandoned
Fuel freezes
Fuel contamination
Mechanical failure of pump
No electricity for fuel pump
Operator failure
Leakage depletion of fuel
Usage depletion of fuel
Flooding of roads
Traffic
Weather bad driving conditions
2nd party vehicle inoperable AND person vehicle unavailable
2nd party vehicle inoperable AND person vehicle inoperable
2nd party vehicle unavailable AND person vehicle unavailable
2nd party vehicle unavailable AND person vehicle inoperable
Wont move personal
Wont move conditional (family AND pets)
Didnt receive Evacuation notice (language barrier OR not receiver OR no notice OR
inoperable receiver)

Problem 2:
_ _ _
A+B+C = A*B*C

Problem 3:

MCS

E
C
CO
P1 * T2
P1 * P2
P1 * V2
T1 * P2
T1 * T2
T1 * V2
V1 * P2
V1 * T2
V1 * V2

If support systems were made redundant, there are still common-cause failures (like
manufacturing defects, environmental conditions exceeding design limits, etc.) that create
dependencies between two trains. There are also other common-cause failures between
the two trains that are component-independent (like wrong type of fuel may have been
supplied, fuel tank empty/not refilled, testing/maintenance procedures wrong, etc.)

You might also like