0% found this document useful (0 votes)
988 views7 pages

Statistics Question Bank VT

The manufacturer produces shirts with a 0.1% defect rate. A shopkeeper buys 100 boxes of 500 shirts each. Using a Poisson distribution: - About 61 boxes will contain no defective shirts - About 9 boxes will contain at least 2 defective shirts The document then analyzes linear regression models to determine the relationship between variables like length and weight. It finds the equation of the least squares regression line when length is the independent variable and when length is the dependent variable. Finally, it analyzes data from an experiment on the breaking strength of synthetic fibers. Four machines and three operators were used. A contingency table is made and a chi-squared test is performed to see if breaking strength is independent of machine and operator

Uploaded by

jainravi88
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
988 views7 pages

Statistics Question Bank VT

The manufacturer produces shirts with a 0.1% defect rate. A shopkeeper buys 100 boxes of 500 shirts each. Using a Poisson distribution: - About 61 boxes will contain no defective shirts - About 9 boxes will contain at least 2 defective shirts The document then analyzes linear regression models to determine the relationship between variables like length and weight. It finds the equation of the least squares regression line when length is the independent variable and when length is the dependent variable. Finally, it analyzes data from an experiment on the breaking strength of synthetic fibers. Four machines and three operators were used. A contingency table is made and a chi-squared test is performed to see if breaking strength is independent of machine and operator

Uploaded by

jainravi88
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 7

Question 1.

A manufacturer produces shirts, finds that 0.1% of the shirts are defective. The shirts are
packed in boxes contains 500 shirts. A shopkeeper buys 100 boxes from the producers.
Using Poisson distribution, find how many boxes will contain:-
1. no defective, and
2. At least two defectives.

Solution:-

Given: - N = 100, n = 500, p probability of defective = 0.001,


λ = np = 500 X 0.001 =0.5 and e= 2.7128
let the random variable X denote the number of defective shirts in a box of 500.then by
Poisson probability law, the probability of x defective shirts in a box is given by:

e 0.5 (0.5) x 0.6065 X (0.5) x


P( X  x)   : x  0,1,2,...........
x! x!

Hence in a consignment of 100 boxes, the frequency (number) of boxes containing x


defective shirt is:

100 X 0.6065 X (0.5) x


f ( x )  N .P ( X  x ) 
x!

1. Number of boxes containing no defective shirts


= 100 XP( X  0)  100 X 0.6065  61
2. Number of boxes containing at least two defective shirts
=100[P (X ≥2)] = 100{1-P(X=0) – P (X=1)}
=100(1 – 0.6065 – 0.6065 X 0.5) = 100 X 0.9025 = 9
Question 2.
Fit a least-squares line data by using
a) X as the independent variable
b) X as dependent variable

Length 70 63 72 60 66 70 74 65 62 67 65 68
X (in)
Weight 155 150 180 135 156 168 178 160 132 145 139 152
Y (lb)

Solution:-
a) Considering X as an independent variable, so that the least-square line can be written
as
 xy  xY
y( )x or y( )
 x2  x2
Where x  X  X and y  Y Y .

Length X Weight Y x X X y  Y Y xy x2 y2
70 155 3.2 0.8 2.56 10.24 0.64
63 150 -3.8 -4.2 15.96 14.44 17.64
72 180 5.2 25.8 134.16 27.04 656.64
60 135 -6.8 -19.2 130.56 46.24 368.64
66 156 -0.8 1.8 -1.44 0.64 3.24
70 168 3.2 13.8 44.16 10.24 190.44
74 178 7.2 23.8 171.36 51.84 566.44
65 160 -1.8 5.8 -10.44 3.24 33.64
62 132 -4.8 -22.2 106.56 23.04 492.84
67 145 0.2 -9.2 -1.84 0.04 84.64
65 139 -1.8 -15.2 27.36 3.24 1
68 152 1.2 -2.2 -2.64 1.44 4.84
 X  802  Y  1850  xy  616.32  x 2  191.68  y 2  2659.68
X  66.8 Y  154.2

802 1850
X   66.8 and Y   154.2
12 12
The required least-square line is
 xy 616.32
y( )x  x  3.22 x
x 2
191.68
or Y  154.2  3.22( X  66.8)  Y  3.22 X  60.9 this equation is called the
regression line of y on x and is used for estimating Y from given value of X.
b) if X is the dependent variable, the required line is
 xy 616.32
x( )y  y  0.232 y
y 2
2659.68
or X  66.8  0.232(Y  154.2)  X  31.0  0.232Y this equation is called the
regression line of X on Y and is used for estimating X from given value of Y.

SECOND METHOD
N  X 'Y '  (  X ' )( Y ' ) N  X 'Y '  ( Y ' )( X ' )
a1  and b1 
N  X '2  ( Y ' ) 2 N  Y '2  ( Y ' ) 2

x '  X '  X '  ( X  A)  ( X  A)  X  X  x

y '  Y '  Y '  (Y  B)  (Y  B)  Y  Y  y


We may reduce suitable constants from X and Y. we choose to subtract 65 from X and
150 from Y. then the result can be as shown in table.

X' Y' X '2 X 'Y ' Y '2


5 5 25 25 25
-2 0 4 0 0
7 30 49 210 900
-5 -15 25 75 225
1 6 1 6 36
5 18 25 90 324
9 28 81 252 784
0 10 0 0 100
-3 -18 9 54 324
2 -5 4 -10 25
0 -11 0 0 121
3 2 9 6 4
 X '  22 Y '  50  X ' 2  232  X 'Y '  708 Y '2  2868

N  X 'Y '  ( X ' )( Y ' ) (12)(708)  (22)(50)


a1    3.22 and
N  X '2  ( Y ' ) 2 (12)(232)  ( 22) 2
N  X 'Y '  (  Y ' )( X ' ) (12)(708)  (50)(22)
b1    0.232
N  Y '2  ( Y ' ) 2 (12)(2868)  (50) 2
22 50
Since X  65   66.8 and Y  150   154.2 , the regression equation are
12 12
Y  154.2  3.22( X  66.8)  Y  3.22 X  60.9 and
X  66.8  0.232(Y  154.2)  X  31.0  0.232Y in agreement with first method.
Question 3:-
In a partially destroyed laboratory, record of an analysis of correlation data, the following
results are legible:
Variance X  9 , Regression equations : 8 X  10Y  66  0,40 X  18Y  214.
What are :
i) the mean value of X and Y,
ii) the correlation coefficient between X and Y, and
iii) the standard deviation of Y ?

Solution :-
i) since both line of regression pass through the point ( X , Y ), we have:
8 X  10Y  66  0, and
40 X  18Y  214.
Solving we get X  13, Y  17

ii) let 8 X  10Y  66  0, and 40 X  18Y  214. be the line of regression of Y


on X and X on Y respectively. these equations can be put in the form :
8 66 18 214
Y  X and X  Y
10 10 14 40
8 4
 bYX  Regression coefficient of Y on X = 
10 5
18 9
And  b XY  Regression coefficient of X on Y = 
40 20
4 9 9 3
Hence r  bYX .b XY  .   r     0 .6
2

5 20 25 5
Y 4 3 
iii) We have bYX  r.   . Y
X 5 5 3
hence  Y  4.

Question No: 4
The factor that influence the breaking strength of a synthetic fibre are being studied. Four
producyion machine and three operators are chosen and the experiment is run using a
fibre from the same production batch. The results are as follows:
Operator Machine 1 Machine 2 Machine 3 Machine 4
1 109 110 108 110
2 110 110 111 114
3 116 112 114 120

Analyze the data and draw conclusions. Use   0.05

Solution:

Since there are two parameter so contingency method will be used.

Operator Machine 1 Machine 2 Machine 3 Machine 4 Total


1 109 110 108 110 437
2 110 110 111 114 445
3 116 112 114 120 462
Total 335 332 333 344 1344

Assuming the null hypothesis as


H0 : the breaking strength is independent of machine and operator.

Machine/operator f0 fe f 0- f e (f 0- f e)2/ f e
1,1 109 108.92 0.08 0.000058
1,2 110 110.91 -0.91 0.0075
1,3 116 115.16 0.85 0.00627
2,1 110 107.94 2.06 0.0389
2,2 110 109.92 0.08 0.000058
2,3 112 114.12 -2.12 0.0393
3,1 108 108.27 -0.27 0.00067
3,2 111 110.25 0.75 0.0051
3,3 114 114.46 -0.46 0.0018
4,1 110 111.85 -1.85 0.0305
4,2 114 113.89 0.15 0.00019
4.3 120 118.25 1.75 0.0286
Totals 1344 1344.00 0.00 X 0 =0.1589

row total X column total


expected frequency ( f e ) 
grand total
No. of degrees of freedom in contingency table = (no. of rows-1) X (no. of column - 1)
=(3–1)X(4–1)
=2X3=6
Here   0 . 05
So, the f-table value for f 6, 0.05 = 12.69 ( X value)
Since the calculated value is much lesser than table value. So, null hypothesis is true.

Question no. 5
A process is controlled with a fraction of non-conforming control chart with three sigma
limit, n = 400, UCL = 0.161, CL= 0.080 and LCL = 0.
Find the equivalent control chart for the number of non conforming.

Solution:

For fraction p chart is used.


3
So,    p and UCL   
n
Here, p  0.080 (given)
The equivalent control chart for the number (proportion) of non-conforming np chart is
used.
So,   np  100 X 0.080  8
And   np (1  p ) = 100 X 0.080(1  0.080) = 7.36

Control limit for np chart;   3  8  3 X 7.36  8  22.08


Therefore,
UCL = 8 + 22.08 = 30.08
LCL = 8 – 22.08 = - 14.08

You might also like