Management, 10/E: Powerpoint Presentation To Accompany
Management, 10/E: Powerpoint Presentation To Accompany
to Accompany
Management, 10/e
John R. Schermerhorn, Jr.
Chapter 2:
History of Management Thought
Classical approaches to
management include:
Scientific management
Administrative principles
Bureaucratic organization
Characteristics
Possible
of bureaucratic disadvantages of
organizations: bureaucracy:
Excessive paperwork
Clear division of labor
or “red tape”
Clear hierarchy of Slowness in handling
authority
problems
Formal rules and Rigidity in the face of
procedures
shifting needs
Impersonality Resistance to change
Careers based on Employee apathy
merit
Hawthorne studies
Initial study examined how economic
incentives and physical conditions
affected worker output.
No consistent relationship found.
“Psychological factors” influenced
results.
productivity:
Group atmosphere
Participative supervision
Social
Esteem
Self-actualization
McGregor’s McGregor’s
Theory X Theory Y
assumes that assumes that
workers: workers are:
Willing to work
Dislike work Capable of self
control
Lack ambition Willing to accept
Are irresponsible responsibility
Resist change Imaginative and
creative
Prefer to be led Capable of self-
direction
Organizations as Systems
System
Collection of interrelated parts that function
together to achieve a common purpose.
Subsystem
A smaller component of a larger system.
Open systems
Organizations that interact with their
environments in the continual process of
transforming resource inputs into outputs.
Contingency thinking
Tries to match managerial responses
with problems and opportunities unique
to different situations.
Especially individual or environmental
differences.
No “one best way” to manage.
Appropriate way to manage depends on
the situation.
Learning organizations
• Organizations that are able to continually learn
and adapt to new circumstances.
• Core ingredients include:
Mental models
Personal mastery
Systems thinking
Shared vision
Team learning
Evidence-Based Management
• Making management decisions on “hard facts” about
what really works