XMAX Technology
XMAX Technology
Page 1
XMAX TECHNOLOGY
CHAPTER-1
INTRODUCTION
Page 2
XMAX TECHNOLOGY
1.1Current Situation:
Wireless operators today are facing a dilemma. Customers are demanding more and more data applications to be delivered on the go. However, the operator is using scarce expensive licensed spectrum that is overburdened with delivering core voice services. Support for voice, data, location awareness, chat and other applications are required for customers that are very mobile. The operator is facing a choice of acquiring more licensed spectrum (if any is available) or losing customers due to demand for advanced services. xG Technology has a solution to this dilemma of overwhelming demand for advanced applications versus lack of spectrum. xG Technology is developing an affordable mobile voice and data cellular system that operates in free unlicensed bands using what is known as cognitive radio technology. Using cognitive (i.e., smart) radios and advanced system and signal processing capabilities, the xG system makes unlicensed spectrum communications as reliable as licensed band communications. This is made possible by effectively mitigating the interference in the congested and chaotic unlicensed bands. Another advantage of xGs cognitive radio approach is the reduction of the RF engineering the operator needs to deploy and maintain the system.
1.1.1Cognitive Radio:
Cognitive radio (CR) is a form of wireless communication in which a transceiver can intelligently detect which communication channels are in use and which are not, and instantly move into vacant channels while avoiding occupied ones. This optimizes the use of available radio-frequency (RF) spectrum while minimizing interference to other users. A third benefit of this system is the ability to reuse all the engineering going into smartphones, tablets and laptops today. The xG system is designed to support these devices through a physical or WiFi connection. Finally, the xG system is all-IP protocol based so that it can utilize COTS (commercial off-the-shelf) infrastructure components for network connectivity, standard applications and established management interfaces.
Page 3
XMAX TECHNOLOGY
Fig:1.1 Logo of xG
Leverages COTS end user devices including 3G and 4G smartphones, tablets and netbooks without requiring licensed commercial frequencies. Dynamic Spectrum Access (DSA) and advanced interference mitigation to increase operational and deployment flexibility. 5g Full cognitive networking capabilities including dynamic access and optimization of available spectrum resources, as well as self-Radio Frequency (RF) planning and selforganizing. A single end-to-end IP network architecture supporting mobile voice, wideband data, real time video, chat and other apps.
Page 4
XMAX TECHNOLOGY
CHAPTER-2
xMax NETWORK COMPONENTS
Page 5
XMAX TECHNOLOGY
Page 6
XMAX TECHNOLOGY
2.1 xMod:
The xMod is a small battery or vehicle-powered radio that bridges the COTS end user device to the wideband transport layer of the xMax system. Devices may be physically tethered or connected via secure WiFi links to the xMod. The xMod can deliver up to 3.5Mbps to the connected end user device(s) under real world conditions
Fig:2.1 xMod
2.2 xAP:
The xAP acts as a compact, high-performance base station and wirelessly connects to the xMod using the xMax cognitive networking waveform. Each xAP can deliver up to 14 Mbps of total user bandwidth to its associated xMods. xAPs may be deployed individually or in clusters of up to 9 xAPs to increase total throughput.
Fig:2.2 xAP
DRK Institute of Science & Technology Page 7
XMAX TECHNOLOGY
2.3 xMSC:
The xMSC acts as both a base station controller and aggregation point for the connected xAPs. It performsrouting and security functions, as well as proprietary mobile VoIP optimization and compression. The xMSC is typically connected to the worldwide Internet and one or more VoIP soft switches.
Fig:2.3 xMSC
2.4 xMonitor/xDrive:
These software tools provide integrated and comprehensive network and element management for the xMax network, as well as mobile network throughput and coverage optimization.
Fig:2.4 xMonitor/Drive
DRK Institute of Science & Technology Page 8
XMAX TECHNOLOGY
CHAPTER-3
WORKING OF XMAX TECHNOLOGY
Page 9
XMAX TECHNOLOGY
Page 10
XMAX TECHNOLOGY
XMAX TECHNOLOGY
3.5 Interference tolerance, frequency reuse and high link reliability:
By applying cognitive capabilities to enhance active interference mitigation, xMax can operate effectively under higher interference and jamming levels than competing solutions. This is critical for maximizing reliability as well as increasing the utilization of scarce spectrum resources. By enabling xMax to tolerate high levels of interference before requiring the radios to switch channels, more gray spectrum (spectrum containing interference or jamming) can be used in place of white spectrum (clean and interference-free spectrum). This capability increases the networks total throughput and capacity greatly without consuming additional scarce spectrum resources. Since the technique is primarily implemented within the receiver chain, the RF environment is not made noisier as would be the case for mitigation techniques that rely on raising the transmitter power to overcome the interferer. This technique significantly increases the system capacity of an xMax network.
Page 12
XMAX TECHNOLOGY
CHAPTER-4
Wi-Fi
Page 13
XMAX TECHNOLOGY
4.1 Wi-Fi:
Wireless networking, also called WiFi or 802.11 networking, is used to connect the computers at home, and some cities are trying to use the technology to provide free or lowcost Intrnet access to residents.
Page 14
XMAX TECHNOLOGY
They use 802.11 networking standards, which come in several flavors: 802.11a transmits at 5 GHz and can move up to 54 megabits of data per second. It also uses orthogonal frequencydivision multiplexing (OFDM), a more efficient coding technique that splits that radio signal into several sub-signals before they reach a receiver. This greatly reduces interference. 802.11b is the slowest and least expensive standard. For a while, its cost made it popular, but now it's becoming less common as faster standards become less expensive. 802.11b transmits in the 2.4 GHz frequency band of the radio spectrum. It can handle up to 11 megabits of data per second, and it uses complementary code keying (CCK) modulation to improve speeds. 802.11g transmits at 2.4 GHz like 802.11b, but it's a lot faster -- it can handle up to 54 megabits of data per second. 802.11g is faster because it uses the same OFDM coding as 802.11a. 802.11n is the newest standard that is widely available. This standard significantly improves speed and range. For instance, although 802.11g theoretically moves 54 megabits of data per second, it only achieves real-world speeds of about 24 megabits of data per second because of network congestion. 802.11n, however, reportedly can achieve speeds as high as 140 megabits per second. The standard is currently in draft form -- the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) plans to formally ratify 802.11n by the end of 2009. Other 802.11 standards focus on specific applications of wireless networks, like wide area networks (WANs) inside vehicles or technology that lets you move from one wireless network to another seamlessly. WiFi radios can transmit on any of three frequency bands. Or, they can "frequency hop" rapidly between the different bands. Frequency hopping helps reduce interference and lets multiple devices use the same wireless connection simultaneously. As long as they all have wireless adapters, several devices can use one router to connect to the Internet. This connection is convenient, virtually invisible and fairly reliable; however, if the router fails or if too many people try to use high-bandwidth applications at the same time, users can experience interference or lose their connections.
XMAX TECHNOLOGY
4.4 Comparison between xMax and Wi-Fi:
As calculated above, the received signal power at the xMax receiver was -120.91 dBW or -90.91 dBm. The Ruckus Wireless 802.11g transceiver specifies a receiver sensitivity of only -96 dBm at 6 Mb/s. That's 5 dB less power for almost twice the data rate (6 Mb/s Vs 3.7 Mb/s), or 7.1 dB less power for WiFi compared to xMax at the same speed. Note that this comparison does not require any estimates, while the Eb/N0 calculation above required that we estimate the noise temperature of the receiving system. This is because receiver sensitivity figures combine the effects of system noise and demodulator/decoder Eb/N0. It is possible that the xMax demo operated with link margin, meaning that it could have worked on a weaker signal than the one used. But one can reasonably presume that if this were the case, xG would have lowered the signal level and eliminated the margin to make its demo seem more impressive. In any event, xG Technology is the one claiming to have a new and vastly more power-efficient modulation method so it is entirely up to them to prove it. The xMax demo may impress those who haven't done the calculations and are unaware of how little power it actually takes to transmit digital data over a benign line-ofsight path. But the same demonstrated performance could have been easily achieved with just about any conventional digital modulation scheme, including an off-the-shelf WiFi transceiver, and some of these schemes already come very close to the theoretical limits. Broadcast stations use such powerful transmitters because they cannot assume line of sight paths; large margins are required to reliably overcome obstacles, fading, reflections and interference throughout their entire service areas. This is not to say there can't be any more big developments in digital radio communications; far from it! But they will not come as fundamental modulation breakthroughs from xG Technologies or anyone else. Opportunities still abound in frequency reuse, the basis of modern cellular phones; cooperative ad-hoc networking; improved spectrum sharing; better adaptivity to changing or hostile radio link conditions; improved interference mitigation; multiple-in, multiple-out (MIMO) antenna arrays; improvements in RF hardware that will let us make better use of the underutilized higher frequency bands, and in other ways but not from breakthroughs in modulation, because there won't be any more. By way of analogy, dialup modems reached their theoretical limits years ago, but Internet access speeds continue to rise thanks to cable modems, fibre deployments, radio networking, and DSL.
Page 16
XMAX TECHNOLOGY
4.5 xMax and Wi-Fi differences:
Page 17
XMAX TECHNOLOGY
CHAPTER-5
ADVANTAGES , DISADVANTAGES & APPLICATIONS OF XMAX TECHNOLOGY
Page 18
XMAX TECHNOLOGY
5.1 Advantages:
Quality of service (QoS) to support long ranges mobile VoIP. Deterministic latency on wireless links for voice packets. Header compression. Zero latency network configuration. Soft hand- off mechanism. Substantially lower capital requirements for materially more sophisticated product offering. No spectrum license costs. Exclusive service territories. Network capacity managed through software-defined radio system. Path to 4G performance with a revolutionary battery solution for user device.
5.2 APPLICATIONS:
The completely new mobile VoIP system that is similar to most popular VoIP service providers like skype. xMax cognitive radio cellular system represents a complete, scalable mobile wide band solution that is capable of supporting a wide range of smart phones,tablets,net books and other end user devices. The coverage and capacity of the network can be tailored to the market and business model at hand and can be rapidly reconfigured to support new or expanded applications. xMaxs cognitive networking technology is frequency agnostic and can be adapted to a wide array of TV spaces, unlicensed frequency bands. The xMax systems cognitive networking capability allows it to dynamically access and optimize available spectrum resources, while also enabling it to optimize its own RF plan. xMaxs end-to-end IP network architecture supports mobile voice,widwband,real time video, chat and other apps over a single integrated network, unlike typically 3G and 4G networks that require separate voice and data network equipment and transport layers.
Page 19
XMAX TECHNOLOGY
5.3 Disadvantages:
VoIP technology is great at saving its users money, but it does have some disadvantages you have to be connected to a computer to use it, and VoIP calls are blocked on some networks by cellular companies concerned that they are missing out on revenues. There is also an issue with quality, as cellular networks are not designed for Internet voice traffic. US-based xG Technology has addressed these problems with its xMax system, which has been specifically designed for mobile VoIP. The network uses available free spectrum, rather than licensed spectrum and an all-IP architecture that is less expensive to operate than traditional networks. Although the test was limited in its scope, he used a phone connected to a laptop while being driven around Fort Lauderdale and reported that the voice quality was fine. There still seems to be issues to address, as the phone eventually overheated, but it seems that mobile VoIP could not be too far away.
FUTURESCOPE:
The XMAX technology can provide fixed, nomadic, portable solution and with OFDMA at the heart of the technology, it can also deliver mobile wireless broadband connectivity across vast open and congested areas, over many kilometres. With the XMAX Customer Premises Equipment, IPaXIom gives businesses, enterprise and the end customer get more options for broadband connectivity at lower cost. The XMAX comes with its own NMS for comprehensive and user friendly day-to-day management and support function.
Page 20
XMAX TECHNOLOGY
Conclusion:
From my analysis it seems that xG's xMax technology is nothing special. Despite xG's implications to the contrary, no spectacular results have been demonstrated, certainly nothing that would call into question the fundamental principles of communication theory that have been firmly established for six decades. And a reading of xG's published claims and patents belie a surprising lack of awareness of these principles. Prospective investors should be very wary.
References:
www.xgtechnology.com A review of Bobier's TriState Integer Cycle Modulation, added 16 May 2007 comments on MiCOM lab test of xMax, added 4 June 2007 comments on Prof. Stu Schwartz's evaluation of xMax added 6 June 2007 an analysis of xG's claims that xMax requires 3,000,000 times less power than WiFi, revised 29 June 2007 Prof. Ben Friedlander's blog on xMax and other wireless fantasies, added 21 June 2007 Comments on Patent Application 20040196910 from an engineer who wishes to remain anonymous, added 17 June 2007.
Page 21
XMAX TECHNOLOGY
Page 22