Direct Air Support Center Guide
Direct Air Support Center Guide
To Our Readers Changes: Readers of this publication are encouraged to submit suggestions and changes that will improve it. Recommendations may be sent directly to Commanding General, Marine Corps Combat Development Command, Doctrine Division (C 42), 3300 Russell Road, Suite 318A, Quantico, VA 22134-5021 or by fax to 703-784-2917 (DSN 278-2917) or by E-mail to morgann@mccdc. usmc.mil. Recommendations should include the following information:
l
Location of change Publication number and title Current page number Paragraph number (if applicable) Line number Figure or table number (if applicable) Nature of change Add, delete Proposed new text, preferably double-spaced and typewritten Justification and/or source of change
Additional copies: A printed copy of this publication may be obtained from Marine Corps Logistics Base, Albany, GA 31704-5001, by following the instructions in MCBul 5600, Marine Corps Doctrinal Publications Status. An electronic copy may be obtained from the Doctrine Division, MCCDC, world wide web home page that is found at the following universal reference locator: http://www.doctrine.usmc.mil.
Unless otherwise stated, whenever the masculine gender is used, both men and women are included.
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY Headquarters United States Marine Corps Washington, D.C. 20380-1775 15 November 2001 FOREWORD The Marine air command and control system (MACCS) provides the Marine aviation combat element (ACE) commander with the means to exercise control of those organic and nonorganic aviation assets necessary to support Marine air-ground task force (MAGTF) operations. Marine Corps Warfighting Publication (MCWP) 3-25, Control of Aircraft and Missiles, addresses basic planning considerations for MACCS operations, employment, and interoperability among MACCS and joint service agencies. MCWP 3-25.5, Direct Air Support Center Handbook, complements and expands on the information in the MCWP 3-25 by focusing on the details of direct air support center (DASC) operations and the role the DASC plays in integrated MAGTF operations. Written for MAGTF, naval expeditionary force, and joint force commanders and staffs, MCWP 3-25.5 highlights DASC organization, equipment, planning considerations, operational fundamentals, and employment options. By investigating these areas, MCWP 3-25.5 provides the requisite information needed by commanders and staffs to understand and evaluate the operational principles and capabilities of various DASC employment options.
1-2
MCRP 3-25.5
This publication is a revision of MCWP 3-25.5 dated 16 September 1996. Reviewed and approved this date. BY DIRECTION OF THE COMMANDANT OF THE MARINE CORPS
/s/ EDWARD HANLON, JR. Lieutenant General, U.S. Marine Corps Commanding General Marine Corps Combat Development Command DISTRIBUTION: 143 000015 00
iv
MCWP 3-25.5
AN/UYQ-3A Mobile Direct Air Support Center (Airborne) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Operator Positions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Communications . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Situation Displays. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . AN/MRC-145/138 and Man-Portable Radios . . . . . . . . . . . Mobile Electric Power. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Capabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Flexibility . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Mobility . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Echelon Capability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Limitations. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Procedural Control . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Line-of-Sight Communications . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Electronic Signature . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Equipment Upgrades and Replacements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2-3 2-4 2-4 2-4 2-5 2-5 2-5 2-6 2-6 2-6 2-6 2-7 2-7 2-7 2-7
Chapter 3. Planning
Initial . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Intelligence . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Site Selection . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Specific Air Support . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Electronic Warfare . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . External Support . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3-1 3-3 3-4 3-5 3-6 3-8
Chapter 4. Operations
Employment Options . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . DASC . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . DASC(A) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ASE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ASLT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Concept of Employment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . MEF . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . MEB . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . MEU . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Interagency Relationships . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . DASC/TACC . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . DASC/FSCC . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . DASC/Antiair Warfare (AAW) Agencies . . . . . . . . . DASC/TAC(A). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . DASC/ASC(A). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . DASC/TACP/Forward Air Controller (FAC)/FAC(A) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . DASC/UAV . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . DASC/Medical Regulation Team (MRT) . . . . . . . . . DASC/Rear Area Operations Center (RAOC). . . . . . DASC in Amphibious Operations. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Phasing Ashore. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Responsibility. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ATF Supporting Arms Agencies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Transfer of Control and Coordination of Supporting Arms . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4-1 4-1 4-1 4-2 4-3 4-3 4-4 4-5 4-7 4-8 4-8 4-10 4-12 4-13 4-13 4-14 4-14 4-15 4-15 4-16 4-16 4-16 4-17 4-17
vi
MCWP 3-25.5 4-19 4-20 4-21 4-21 4-22 4-23 4-23 4-24 4-24 4-25 4-25 4-25 4-26 4-26
DASC in Joint/Multinational Operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Joint Operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Multinational Operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Special Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Procedural Control of Direct Air Support Aircraft . . . . . . . DASC Siting Considerations. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Proximity to the FSCC . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Communications . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Security . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Mobility . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Future Employment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . DASC Configuration . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . DASC(A) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ASE. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Appendices
A Crew Briefing Guide/Format . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . B Training. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . C Glossary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . D References and Related Publications . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . A-1 B-1 C-1 D-1
Chapter 1 Fundamentals
The direct air support center (DASC) is the principal Marine air command and control system (MACCS) air control agency responsible for the direction of air operations directly supporting ground forces. It functions in a decentralized mode of operation, but is directly supervised by the Marine tactical air command center (Marine TACC) or the Navy tactical air control center (Navy TACC). During amphibious or expeditionary operations, the DASC is normally the first MACCS agency ashore and usually lands in the same category (i.e., scheduled or on-call wave) as the ground combat element's (GCEs) senior fire support coordination center. The DASCs parent unit is the Marine air support squadron (MASS) of the Marine air control group (MACG).
Role
The DASC processes immediate air support requests; coordinates aircraft employment with other supporting arms; manages terminal control assets supporting GCE and combat service support element forces; and controls assigned aircraft, unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs), and itinerant aircraft transiting through DASC controlled airspace. The DASC controls and directs air support activities that affect the GCE commanders focus on close operations and those air missions requiring integration with the ground combat forces (close air support [CAS], assault support, and designated air reconnaissance). The DASC does not normally control aircraft conducting deep air support (DAS) missions as detailed coordination of DAS missions are not required
1-2
MCWP 3-25.5
with ground forces. However, the DASC will provide battle damage assessments (BDAs) and mission reports (MISREPs) from DAS missions to the GCEs senior fire support coordination center (FSCC) and TACC when required.
Tasks
The DASC
l
Receives the air tasking order (ATO) from the TACC (Marine or Navy) and coordinates preplanned direct air support. Receives, processes, and coordinates requests for immediate direct air support. Adjusts preplanned schedules, diverts airborne assets, and launches aircraft as necessary when delegated authority by the aviation combat element (ACE) commander and in coordination with the Marine air-ground task force (MAGTF) force fires coordination center (FFCC) or GCE senior FSCC. Coordinates the execution of direct air support missions with other supporting arms through the appropriate FFCC/FSCC and, as required, with the appropriate MACCS agencies. Receives and disseminates pertinent tactical information reported by aircraft performing direct air support missions. Provides aircraft and air control agencies with advisory and threat information to assist in the safe conduct of flight. Monitors, records, and displays information on direct air support missions. Maintains friendly and enemy ground situation displays necessary to coordinate direct air support operations.
1-3
Provides direct air support aircraft and other MACCS agencies with information concerning the friendly and enemy situation. Refers unresolved conflicts in supporting arms to the FFCC/ FSCC fire support coordinator (FSC).
DASC Organization
The DASC crew is task-organized to meet operational requirements. Crewmembers are assigned positions based on their level of qualification and experience. Figure 1-1 on page 1-4 shows a notional DASC organization. Appendix A is a crew briefing guide/format. Appendix B discusses training (individual, crew, unit, and evaluation).
Officer in Charge
The DASC officer in charge (OIC) is a commissioned officer not normally assigned to a crew as a watch stander. The DASC OIC is designated by the MASS commanding officer for a specific operation and is responsible for the following:
l l l l
Embarkation and logistics. Conduct of DASC operations. Configuration of the DASC communications. Coordinating with joint, multinational, and other external agencies as required. Evaluating and supervising training for the DASC crew.
1-4
MCWP 3-25.5
Assisting the DASC OIC as required. Coordinating the DASCs embarkation and logistics. Evaluating and supervising training for enlisted crewmembers. Accounting for personnel assigned to the detachment.
1-5
Assisting in coordination with joint, multinational, and other external agencies. Providing situation briefings and coordinating the future efforts of DASC operations. Evaluating, supervising, and assisting in training DASC crewmembers.
l l
Functioning of the DASC crew on watch. Ensuring intelligence information received by the DASC is disseminated to appropriate air control, air defense, and supporting arms elements. Receiving, disseminating, and posting fire support information in the DASC. Coordinating with fire support agencies to ensure deconfliction between aircraft and supporting arms is accomplished. Coordinating the efforts of DASC liaison teams and airborne extensions of the DASC as required. Coordinating with agencies external to DASC. Directing DASC communications restoration priorities and the upkeep of DASC communications status. Maintaining a log of significant events that occur during the crews watch.
1-6
MCWP 3-25.5
Ensuring the logs of the tactical air director (TAD), helicopter director (HD), and crew chief are complete, reviewed for clarity, and properly signed in and out. Assigning appropriate aircraft to immediate air support requests.
Crew Chief
The DASC crew chief, normally a staff noncommissioned officer or noncommissioned officer and the most qualified enlisted watch stander, is responsible to the SAD for the following:
l l
l l
Timely and accurate display of tactical information. Coordinating communications restoration and the upkeep of communications status. Maintaining a log of significant events that occur during the crew watch and files containing required forms and records. Ensuring the net operators logbooks are completed, checked for clarity, and properly signed in and out. Coordinating DASC-internal information flow. Supervising the enlisted members of the crew.
Coordinating and controlling fixed-wing offensive air support (OAS) aircraft, UAVs, and designated assault support, electronic warfare (EW), and air reconnaissance aircraft. Coordinating direct air support missions with fire support assets (e.g., naval surface fire support [NSFS], artillery). Briefing aircrew on assigned missions, threat information, and fire support coordination measures.
1-7
l l
Reviewing requests for fixed-wing aircraft and recommending the most efficient use of available assets. Maintaining status information on fixed-wing aircraft under the control of the DASC or terminal air controllers. Coordinating with the HD to eliminate scheduling or mission assignment conflicts between those missions that involve both fixed- and rotary-wing assets or when more than one mission is conducted in the same area. Advising and directing fixed-wing aircraft as to changes in the air defense warning condition and weapons control status. Maintaining a log and appropriate records. Coordinating with tactical air coordinators (airborne) (TAC[A]) for the control of assigned aircraft.
Helicopter Director
The HD is responsible to the SAD for the following:
l l
Coordinating and controlling helicopters. Coordinating designated rotary-wing missions with fire support assets. Briefing aircrew on assigned missions, threat information, and fire support coordination measures. Reviewing requests for helicopters and recommending the most efficient use of available rotary-wing assets. Maintaining status information on helicopters under control of the DASC or terminal controllers. Coordinating with the TAD to eliminate conflicts between fixed-wing missions and helicopter missions. Coordinating with the assault support coordinator (airborne) (ASC[A]) for control of assigned aircraft.
1-8
MCWP 3-25.5
Advising aircrew of the current air defense warning condition and weapons control status and directing helicopter actions specific to the particular air defense alert condition. Coordinating with the TAD on helicopter missions conducting CAS. Maintaining a log and appropriate records.
Systems Operated
Various command, control, communications, computers, and intelligence systems are also operated by the ASNOs within the DASC. The systems include the following:
l l l l l
Theater battle management core system. Advanced Field Artillery Tactical Data System. MAGTF software base line. Intelligence operator workstation. Command and control personal computer.
Responsibilities
Some net operator functions may be combined depending on the DASCs task organization. ASNOs are specially trained in air control procedures and terminology. An ASNOs responsibilities include the following:
1-9
l l
Knowing net names, frequencies, and types of communications equipment being used. Knowing the call sign, name, and unit location for stations operating on their assigned communications net(s). Knowing the type of information expected to be transmitted and received on the net. Understanding the forms/records required to record information from or to pass information on the net. Understanding the air/ground situation, to include boundaries, control points, and control measures necessary to effectively operate and understand information passed on the net. Managing net operations if assigned as a net control station. Maintaining a log of significant events that occur during the watch. Understanding and executing the correct information flow within the DASC.
Plotting information directed by DASC supervisory personnel. Receiving, recording, and disseminating information received over the appropriate net(s).
1-10
MCWP 3-25.5
Monitoring communications nets. Monitoring the status of the DASCs cryptographic instruments. Providing liaison with other C-E Marines operating associated C-E equipment.
2-2
MCWP 3-25.5
Communications Distribution
The command, control, and communications distribution system is comprised of a system called MESHnet that allows the operator to interface the following items:
l
User control device (UCD) allows the operator access to the radios, intercom, and telephone. With the UCD, the operator can monitor four nets at one time and remotely switch crypto devices on and off. Network access unit (NAU) is the heart of the MESHnet. It routes traffic among UCDs and interfaces with radios, telephones, and an Ethernet computer network. Ethernet interface unit (EIU) connects the Ethernet local area network with the NAU.
System Configuration
The AN/TSQ-207 is preconfigured to support a Marine expeditionary force (MEF) DASC, (i.e., 2 communications variants, 3 operations variants, and 20 operator workstations). Each communications variant is cabled to support three UHF GRC-171 radios, two UHF/VHF VRC-83 radios, two HF VRC-102 radios, two external HF radios, and one external UHF/VHF radio. A MEF-level CASC provides
l l l
2-3
2-4
MCWP 3-25.5
Table 2-1. Equipment Characteristics.
12 feet, 8 inches 7 feet 7 feet 87.6 square feet 614 cubic feet 6,000 pounds (approximately) 115/208 volts, 400 hertz, 15 kilowatts, 3 phase, 4 wire
Operator Positions
The AN/UYQ-3A shelter contains seven crew positions. Each crew position is equipped with a control panel to access the shelters radios and internal communication system.
Communications
The AN/UYQ-3A contains three UHF, one VHF, and two HF systems along with each radios associated cryptographic device. The AN/UYQ-3A also has the ability to use external radios when in the airborne operational configuration. However, special arrangements must be made with the supporting KC-130 squadron to externally mount antennas to the host airframe.
Situation Displays
The AN/UYQ-3A has one primary map display for plotting aircraft position, fire support measures, friendly and enemy ground
2-5
situation, and air control points and measures. Smaller situation displays are available at operator positions for the use of individual operators.
Capabilities
The flexibility, mobility, and echelon capability of the DASC make it an effective command and control agency.
2-6
MCWP 3-25.5
Flexibility
The MASS is capable of task-organizing to provide a variety of direct air support control options. Mission flexibility is demonstrated by the DASCs capability to operate from ground sites or from an airborne platform.
Mobility
MASS equipment is transportable via conventional air, ground, rail or surface shipping means. The MASS table of equipment provides organic motor transportation equipment that is capable of moving DASC equipment. DASC equipment required to support a MEF/MEB can be set up and operational in approximately 1 hour after it arrives on site. However, materials handling equipment support not organic to the MASS is required to move shelters when loading the AN/UYQ-3A into a KC-130 for airborne DASC (DASC[A]) operations.
Echelon Capability
The DASC has the capability of moving to alternate locations with uninterrupted operations. During such movements, the DASC would delegate its functions to an echelon DASC or DASC(A).
Limitations
The DASC is limited to procedural control and line-of-sight (LOS) communications. Its large electronic signature also limits the DASC.
2-7
Procedural Control
The DASC does not possess radar or digital data link equipment. Therefore, situational awareness depends on pilot/terminal controller reports regarding the aircrafts position.
Line-of-Sight Communications
The DASC is susceptible to UHF and VHF LOS communications limitations. The curvature of the earth and terrain can preclude effective communications, especially with low flying aircraft.
Electronic Signature
The DASC has a large electronic signature generated by its communications equipment. Effective planning and employment of emission control (EMCON) procedures are paramount to maximizing survivability.
Chapter 3 Planning
Close coordination for the delivery of surface- and air-delivered weapons is crucial to both the MAGTFs economy of force and the safety of Marines operating within the delivery area. The DASCs planning efforts significantly contribute to the efficiency by which these assets are employed. Marine Corps Order (MCO) 3501.9B, Marine Corps Combat Readiness Evaluation System (Short title: [MCCRES]), Volume VIII, The Marine Air Command and Control System (MACCS), outlines specific planning requirements for the DASC. Though planning of direct air support activities outlined below may occur in sequence, most steps will be conducted concurrently with one another.
Initial
After receipt of an initiating directive (in the case of an amphibious operation), an operation plans initiating order or an establishing order (in the case of a support relationship), the DASC will begin the initial planning phase. Considerations for the initial planning phase include but are not limited to the following:
l
Establishing early liaison with the amphibious task force (ATF) and/or joint force planners and control agencies for relevant phases of operations. Providing air support and aircraft control input to the aviation estimates of supportability for operations assigned, and identifying limitations or problem areas. The input to the aviation estimates of supportability should summarize significant aviation aspects of the situation as they might influence any course of
3-2
MCWP 3-25.5
action (COA) proposals and evaluate and determine how aviation units can best be employed to provide support. The aviation estimates of supportabilitys end product will include a recommended COA for the ACE commander. At a minimum, aviation estimates of supportability will include the following:
m
m m
Contemplated COA that can best be supported by the ACE. Salient disadvantages of less desirable COAs. Significant aviation (to include air command and control [C2]) limitations and problems of a logistical nature. Measures to resolve aviation problems to include requesting additional theater assets.
Coordinating relevant communication requirements for subordinate, adjacent, and higher-level circuits with the ACE/ MAGTF communications planners. These requirements should include the following: m Identification of desired connectivity. m Encryption hardware and software. m Communications requirements that are beyond the capabilities (or assets) of the MASS. m Authentication materials. Establishing coordination with the local regional automated services center. Reviewing the initial force list and/or MACG/ACE planning guidance to determine the role of UAVs in the operation. Recommending to the MACG/ACE planning staff required UAV mission data and format, as it should appear on the ATO. Ensuring air support requirements are coordinated with planned air defense measures.
3-3
Intelligence
The DASC will require updated and complete intelligence information to carry out its support efforts. The DASCs intelligence planning is primarily concerned with the enemy orders of battle (EOBs), capabilities, and tactics. Intelligence planning considerations will include the following:
l
Receiving and disseminating to DASC personnel information from the preliminary and detailed aviation intelligence estimates. This includes submitting requests for information (RFIs) for those DASC concerns that may include the following: m Enemy capabilities. m Off-road trafficability. m Terrain limitations not delineated on maps. m Electronic order of battle. m Weather projections. m Other information not addressed in the operation plan. Developing and forwarding RFIs to higher headquarters. The RFIs should be simple, concise, and consist of the following: m Positive requests. m Qualifying questions and statements. m Prioritization of submitted requests. Recording information in a journal/workbook for ease of study and comparison, and sending that information, when appropriate, to higher, adjacent, and subordinate units. Obtaining and maintaining a complete EOB that includes information on the following: m Missiles. m Aviation assets.
MCWP 3-25.5
m m m
Determining and interpreting information of significance to the DASC and forming logical conclusions that can serve as the basis for determining the effects on air support operations. Establishing intelligence collection and dissemination procedures to include the following: m Timeliness. m Usability of form. m Pertinence. m Security of gathered information. Preparing a detailed rear area threat assessment for the MASS detachment.
Site Selection
The site selection planning process begins once the MAGTFs area of operations (AO) is identified. During the site selection process, planners must ensure that adequate space for site establishment is identified; sufficient access to the site is afforded; and that communications connectivity can be maintained with other MACCS agencies, elements of the GCE, combat service support element, forward operating bases (FOBs), and airborne aircraft. Site selection planning concerns include the following:
l
Conducting coordination with the FFCC and FSCC to ensure that DASC siting considerations are included in the FFCC/ FSCCs site selection.
3-5
Using computer analysis and map surveys to determine suitable DASC/FSCC sites. Computer software programs (e.g., system, planning, engineering evaluation device) can be used with map surveys to provide empirical data and analysis on the following key points: m Communications connectivity. m Cover and concealment. m Trafficability. m Sufficient space for the DASCs tactical deployment (dispersion). m Communications electronic protection (EP) supportability. Identifying the alternate operational sites above. Determining the required DASC equipment based on the MAGTF scheme of maneuver and projected locations of MACCS/terminal control agencies within the AO. Establishing priorities for emplacement of equipment. Conducting a physical reconnaissance of the site with FFCC and FSCC personnel. Determining and recommending to the ACE/MAGTF communications planners any requirements for ground radio relay/retransmission sites to support DASC operations. Determining communication capabilities from prospective sites based on Electromagnetic Compatibility Analysis Center or other radio-frequency studies.
l l
l l
3-6
MCWP 3-25.5
support, should be addressed during this planning phase. Air support planning efforts should include the following:
l
Providing input to the preparation of the ACE/MAGTF communications plan to include DASC communications required for effective coordination and control of direct support aircraft, encryption hardware and software, and authentication materials. Recommending air support control measures (e.g., control points, return to force [RTF] procedures) to the ACE/MAGTF planning staff. Remaining cognizant of planning and coordination involved in establishing airspace management/control procedures. Planning for the DASCs tactical redeployment to alternate sites, along with the FSCC, in response to changes in the MAGTFs requirements, the threat or the ground force positions. Recommending UAV control measures for deconfliction/integration with direct air support aircraft and other supporting arms. Determining communication paths and radio in/out procedures required with the UAV units ground control station (GCS). Determining the requirement to employ airborne extensions to maintain communications connectivity and air control with direct air support aircraft and other air control agencies as appropriate.
Electronic Warfare
In situations where the enemy has a known EW and electronic intelligence (ELINT) collection capability, the unit S-6 officer
3-7
will assume an active role in the DASCs EW planning. EW planning considerations involve
l
Obtaining from the ACE/MAGTF EW officer a detailed intelligence assessment of the enemys electronic order of battle. Developing an EMCON plan for the DASC that supports the ACE/MAGTF EMCON plan. DASC personnel should consider the following factors: m Minimum communication/no communications procedures. m Use of brevity codes and authentication tables. m Use of communications security (COMSEC) materials. m Delegation of EMCON control authority. m Signal security. m Circuit discipline. m Reporting procedures. Determining the locations of radios and radio antenna farms after considering the signals intelligence /EW threat. Planning for the maximum use of secure communications. Providing input to the MAGTF command and control warfare (C2W) plan. Ensuring that planners, operators, and users of electronic equipment thoroughly understand the EW threat and the EMCON/EP techniques used to counter the threat.
l l
3-8
MCWP 3-25.5
External Support
Planners should consider the DASCs method of employment and necessity for mobility when determining the support required from external units. External support planning considerations for the DASC will also include distribution points for food; water; batteries; and petroleum, oils, and lubricants. The DASC may also require externally sourced personnel to augment their site security.
Chapter 4 Operations
The DASC responds to the GCE commanders requirements for direct air support by processing immediate air support requests, coordinating aircraft employment with other supporting arms through the GCEs senior FSCC, and directing designated air operations. The DASCs role in direct air support provides a crucial link between the GCE and the ACE.
Employment Options
The MASS commander may employ an entire DASC, DASC(A), ASE or air support liaison team (ASLT) to support the MAGTF.
DASC
As the MAGTFs primary direct air support control facility, this configuration provides the operational capability to perform DASC-related functions and is normally employed with MEB or larger MAGTFs. The DASC, when practical, collocates with the GCEs senior FSCC. An electronic link may be an acceptable alternative in situations where DASC siting requirements differ from FFCCs/FSCCs requirements.
DASC(A)
Consisting of an AN/UYQ-3A employed in a KC-130 aircraft, the DASC(A) can be employed as an independent air control agency, but normally serves as an airborne extension of the
4-2
MCWP 3-25.5
DASC. Air superiority is essential in the area where a DASC(A) is to be employed. The operational period for a DASC(A) is limited by the host aircrafts time on station capabilities. Normally used during MEB and larger MAGTF operations, the DASC(A) is flexible and adaptable to a variety of operational situations including the following:
l l
Extending overland displacement. Supplementing the DASCs communications coverage while it displaces or when communications become degraded. Operating in geographic areas where terrain adversely affects DASC communications. Performing amphibious operations to aid in phasing direct air support control functions from the Navy TACC to the DASC. Performing missions as directed by the MAGTF commander, ACE commander or MASS commanding officer.
ASE
An ASE is a task-organized element employed by the MASS to perform various air support control functions. Employment options can range from MEU-level operations characterized by limited assets and endurance, to a multi-division operation where the ASE is almost if not identical in capability but set apart in responsibilities and subordinate to the DASC. The ASE can function as an extension of the Navy TACC/helicopter direction center (HDC), in conjunction with the battalion tactical air control party (TACP). In support of a multi-major subordinate command scenario, the ASE may be augmented with assets and personnel to support continuous control of direct air support over an extended period. In this type of situation, the DASC would be employed in a central
4-3
location (i.e., MEF) to coordinate the efforts of the ASE in support of the multiple Marine divisions.
ASLT
The ASLT is task-organized by the MASS to maintain liaison between the DASC and the FSCC, normally in situations where the DASC cannot remain physically collocated with the senior FSCC/FFCC.
Role
The ASLT is not a DASC. The ASLT serves to maintain the face-to-face coordination between the DASC and FSCC vital for the effective coordination and integration of DAS missions with the employment of other supporting arms.
Composition
The number, size, and composition of ASLTs are determined by the MASS commanding officer based on the experience of FSCC personnel, terrain, operational tempo, and the mobility of the GCE. An ASLT typically varies in size from a single Marine with a man-portable radio or field telephone to a number of Marines operating from MRC vehicles.
Concept of Employment
While a particular DASC configuration may be identified with a MEF, MEB or MEU, the specific requirements for a given situation will dictate the actual configuration needed for mission success. One DASC is capable of providing direct air support control
4-4
MCWP 3-25.5
functions to a single division in support of the divisions main effort. The DASCs support of multiple divisions requires employment of assets beyond those normally found in a single MASS.
MEF
Coordination and control of direct air support functions for MEF operations require a substantial DASC capability based on the communications requirement and scheme of maneuver, as well as the number of aircraft anticipated to provide the GCE with direct air support. During MEF operations, the DASC is generally collocated with the senior FSCC/FFCC. The DASC must maintain an echelon capability to provide continuous air control and communications during movement periods. An ASLT may be used in situations where the DASC cannot remain physically collocated with the senior FSCC/FFCC. A DASC(A) may also be employed to assist the DASC in its functioning or to augment their communications. A typical MEF-level configuration (fig. 4-1) consists of the following:
l
l l l
l l l
AN/TSQ-207 CASC, consisting of three operations vehicles/ two communications vehicles with trailers. Access to 24 radio channels (HF, VHF-AM/FM, and UHF). Access to 9 or 18 telephone circuits. Twenty operator workstations. (Each workstation will normally consist of a single UCD and a shared laptop computer.) Intra-communications for 20 operators. Automation to support 12 operators. Tent space, environmental control, and power to support a sustained configuration.
4-5
MEB
In MEB operations involving one or two regiments, the DASC will normally collocate with the FSCC responsible for coordinating GCE supporting arms. The DASC must maintain an echelon capability to provide continuous air control and communications during movement periods. A typical MEB-level configuration (fig. 4-2 on page 4-6) consists of the following:
l
AN/TSQ-207 CASC, consisting of one operations and one communications vehicle with trailers. Access to 12 radio channels (UHF, HF, VHF, and appropriate crypto).
4-6
MCWP 3-25.5
l l l l
Access to 3, 6, or 12 phone lines (dependent on how many NAUs are used. Access to 10 operator UCDs. Intra-communications for up to 10 operators. Automation to support six operators. Tent space, environmental controls, and power to support a mobile configuration.
4-7
MEU
The MEU ACE contains task-organized air C2 agencies and equipment under the cognizance of the MACG detachment. The MASS normally deploys an ASE that will support MEU-level operations to multi-division operations where the ASE is almost if not identical in capability but subordinate to the DASC. A typical ASE configuration (fig. 4-3) will consist of the following:
l
l l
l l
AN/TSQ-207 CASC, consisting of one operations/communications hybrid vehicle with trailer. One NAU with six radios. Two NAUs with six radios and three 32-KB or six 16-KB phones or radios. Intra-communications for up to 10 operators. Tent space, environmental controls, and power to supply a mobile configuration. If units bring a tent, it must be compatible with the mobile configuration.
4-8
MCWP 3-25.5
Interagency Relationships
DASC/TACC
The DASC is subordinate to the Marine TACC, tactical air direction center (TADC) or Navy TACC depending on command relationships and the phase of passing air C2 functions ashore during amphibious operations. Whereas the Marine TACC or Navy TACC provides centralized command of air operations within a designated AO or AOA, the DASC provides for decentralized control of OAS, assault support, electronic warfare, and air reconnaissance missions within their designated area.
OAS
Ideally, the ACE commander will decentralize the control of OAS by delegating authority to the DASC to divert airborne assets to missions with higher priority as coordinated/approved by the senior FSCC/FFCC and to launch on-call CAS aircraft. This serves to ensure minimum response time to the MAGTFs direct air support requirements. The Marine TACC, TADC or Navy TACC responds to the DASCs requests to fill the GCEs needs for additional direct air support. The DASC keeps the Marine TACC, TADC or Navy TACC informed on the progress of direct air support missions, the effectiveness of the OAS effort, and the friendly and enemy air/ground situation. The DASC passes combat information received from other sources to the Marine TACC, TADC or Navy TACC and other agencies/aircrew as appropriate.
Assault Support
Ideally, the ACE commander will decentralize the control of assault support missions and allow the DASC to divert and/or
4-9
launch on-call assault support aircraft to ensure minimum response time to requests for assault support. Control of assault support aircraft outside of the DASC-controlled airspace will be performed by the appropriate MACCS agency. To maintain the flexibility to immediately divert airborne assets, assault support aircraft will normally maintain some communication with a MACCS element. In the conduct of assault support, the Marine TACC, TADC or Navy TACC should assume a supervisory mode and respond to the DASC when additional assets are required to continue the assault support effort. In turn, the DASC must provide their senior agency with timely information regarding the status of assault support missions and the overall effectiveness of the assault support effort.
Electronic Warfare
The DASC will coordinate direct support EW missions with the senior FSCC/FFCC to ensure that airborne EW is effectively integrated as a combined arm. Coordination of airborne EW efforts includes but is not limited to electronic surveillance, targeting, jamming, electronic BDA, and offensive antiair warfare. The DASC will ensure, as required, necessary coordination is made to protect friendly ground units and equipment from the effects of electronic attack (EA) and antiradiation missile attack. Requests for EW are submitted by the appropriate FSCC either to the DASC for immediate requests or to the Marine TACC/Navy TACC for preplanned requests.
Air Reconnaissance
The DASC does not normally coordinate the MAGTFs longrange air reconnaissance efforts. However, the DASC will coordinate with aircrews and the UAV GCS to conduct air reconnaissance in direct support of the GCE. The DASC will provide
4-10
MCWP 3-25.5
verbal inflight and MISREP information that will be passed on to the Marine TACC/Navy TACC and the senior FSCC/FFCC. Hard copy imagery is requested through G-2/S-2 channels. Requests for air reconnaissance missions are submitted by the G-2/ S-2 to the DASC for immediate requests or to the Marine TACC/ Navy TACC for preplanned requests.
DASC/FSCC
The FSCC/FFCC is the final arbitrator of supporting arms integration conflicts and will make decisions in cases of conflicting requests for fire support assets. The FSCC provides the DASC with updates to unit boundaries and fire support coordinating measures, friendly and enemy unit positions, pertinent intelligence data, and other prearranged data items as they are received at the FSCC. The FSCC also provides the DASC with information on gun positions, gun-target lines, and gun trajectories near aircraft flight routes. The DASC is responsible to the FSCC to provide timely information on the following:
l l l l l l l
Predicted flight paths for aircraft under the DASCs control. BDAs. Status of outstanding requests. Pertinent intelligence data. Delays or cancellations to the ATO. Status of ongoing missions. Other prearranged data items.
4-11
The FSCC/FFCC is responsible to the DASC to provide timely information on the following:
l l l l l l l
l l
Location of friendly forces and artillery. Location and capabilities of enemy forces. TACP locations. Target lists. Overlays of the GCE scheme of maneuver. Priority of fires/effort. Approval of joint tactical air strike requests (JTARs)/assault support requests (ASRs). Plans to displace/echelon. Plans for large-scale helicopter/ground movements.
JTAR for immediate OAS (CAS, DAS). ASR for immediate assault support. Joint tactical electronic warfare request (JTEWR) for airborne EW. Joint tactical air reconnaissance and surveillance (JTAR/S) for air reconnaissance. Joint tactical airlift request (may be required in joint operations instead of the ASR to request assault support). Immediate air evacuation, to include casualty evacuation (CASEVAC) (requested using the ASR).
Upon receiving the request, the DASC will clarify any needed portions and assign a request number for reference purposes. For
4-12
MCWP 3-25.5
JTARs, JTAR/Ss, and JTEWRs, the request number is based on the date the JTAR was received followed by a consecutive odd number (e.g., 11-1, 11-3, 11-5). For ASRs, the request number is based on the date it was received followed by a consecutive even number (e.g., 11-2, 11-4 or 11-6). CASEVAC request numbers are based on the date the request was received and a consecutive letter of the alphabet (e.g., 11-A, 11-B or 11-C). The senior FSCC/FFCC monitoring the tactical air request/helicopter request net may approve, disapprove or modify the request. Normally, the senior FSCC/FFCC approves the request by remaining silent (silence is consent unless previous commanders guidance requires positive approval). However, for purposes of confirmation or when doubt concerning the validity of the request exists, the DASCs SAD should coordinate with the FSCCs air officer for clarification of the request.
Diverting Aircraft
The ACE commander may delegate authority to the DASC to divert airborne aircraft or launch on-call aircraft. However, even when delegated this authority, DASC personnel will not normally make divert/launch decisions without consulting with appropriate FSCC personnel when possible. This coordination of fires is effected to limit duplication of effort, ensure appropriate use of assets, and enhance situational awareness between the DASC and FSCC. It also serves as another check and balance to ensure that the aircraft is diverted in concert with the established priorities for direct air support.
4-13
surface-to-air missile units, and aircraft under DASC control. The DASC provides friendly aircraft positions to air defense units/agencies (e.g., Stinger units, TAOC) to assist in the aircraft identification process. The DASC coordinates the RTF of aircraft under its control with the appropriate AAW agency, normally the TAOC. The Stinger unit commander may establish a command post at the DASC to gain information on the location of friendly direct air support and assault support aircraft.
DASC/TAC(A)
The TAC(A) is an onsite airborne extension of the DASC and FSCC or the Marine TACC/Navy TACC. The TAC(A)s authority over aircraft operating within an assigned area will be specified by the DASC or TACC/TADC as appropriate. The TAC(A)s principal responsibilities are to avert conflicts between aircraft and to coordinate the employment of air assets with other supporting arms. The TAC(A) coordinates as necessary with TACPs, FSCCs, forward air controllers (airborne) (FAC[A]), ASC(A)s, and artillery and NSFS fire direction centers. Employment of a TAC(A) will depend on mission requirements and resource availability.
DASC/ASC(A)
The ASC(A) serves as an agency of the Navy tactical air control system/MACCS and is an airborne extension of the HDC or DASC. The ASC(A) supports the air C2 system and assists in airspace coordination and integration of assault support operations when the HDC/DASC is degraded or requires additional augmentation. The ASC(A) is normally used when numerous assault support operations are conducted or when the scope and complexity of the operations dictates this capability. The
4-14
MCWP 3-25.5
ASC(A) coordinates with TAC(A)s and FAC(A)s to provide CAS support and/or assault support operations.
DASC/UAV
The DASC controls the UAVs inflight progression/egression to and from working areas and monitors its activities while in its working area. The UAV normally enters the airspace control system through the ATC element at the UAVs operating airfield. After receiving a handoff from the ATC element, the DASC provides routing and altitude clearance for the UAV. The UAV controllers maintain continuous communications with the DASC. The DASC is kept advised of the UAV working area (using control points and established routes) and altitude by the GCS to ensure deconfliction with other aircraft and friendly surface delivered fires. The UAV controllers also supply the DASC with near-real-time surveillance information. This information is forwarded to the TACC/FSCC for use in the intelligence/targeting effort.
4-15
4-16
MCWP 3-25.5
Responsibility
The command relationship options available to the establishing authority of an amphibious operation include operational control, tactical control, and support. Typically, a support relationship is established between the ATF commander and the landing force (LF) commander based on their complementary capabilities. Normally, the designated commander exercises the initial, overall control and coordination responsibility for the delivery of NSFS, air support, and LF artillery fire. When the LF commander is ashore and has established the necessary facilities and when the tactical situation permits, this coordination responsibility is passed to the LF commander. Thereafter, the LF coordinates the supporting arms fires with maneuver forces. However, complete coordination authority is seldom passed at one time.
4-17
Normally, the LF assumes responsibility for various fire support functions as the necessary capability for that function is established ashore. The DASC is usually the first principal MACCS agency ashore and, once established, will normally assume control of direct air support aviation assets over land while the Navy TACC retains control of aircraft moving from ship to shore.
Navy TACC
The Navy TACC is the primary air control agency within the AOA or designated AO from which air operations supporting the AF are controlled. The Navy TACC controls both air support and AAW aircraft.
SACC
The SACC is a single location on an amphibious ship in which communications facilities incident to the coordination of fire support of the artillery, air, and NSFS are centralized. The SACC is the naval counterpart to the LFs FSCC.
4-18
MCWP 3-25.5
ashore. Direct air support functions are normally passed ashore as MACCS facilities become functional. The LF commander exercises responsibilities for the coordination of supporting fires through the senior FSCC/FFCC and MACCS agencies. Each agency must ensure it has the required information and requisite communications before supporting arms coordination responsibilities are passed from the ATF commander to the LF commander. Since most of the operational coordination occurs in the FSCC, the establishment and functioning of the FSCC(s) is critical to passing supporting arms coordination functions ashore. Once ashore, the FSCC(s) and the DASC begin preparing for the passage of supporting arms coordination and control functions ashore. Typically, this preparation includes ensuring
l
l l
l l
Communications are established with the appropriate control agency afloat. Communications are established with aircraft. Communications are established with terminal controllers/ spotting teams ashore. Target lists are on-hand. Current ATO is on-hand.
The operational functions that must be completed before passing supporting arms coordination functions ashore are normally outlined in a checklist. Completion of specific checklist items is often coordinated between the DASC and the SACC/Navy TACC. Once all or part of the specified prerequisites for passing supporting arms control and coordination functions ashore are met, supporting arms coordination functions may be passed ashore. This normally occurs when the LF requests that the ATF pass control and/or coordination responsibilities of a particular sup-
4-19
porting arms function from the responsible agency afloat to its shore-based counterpart. Formal messages mark the completion of each step in the sequence of passing coordination and control of supporting arms from afloat to ashore. Often, the actual transfer of responsibility is requested and granted by voice radio transmission followed with formal messages. Not all direct air support control functions need be passed ashore at once. For example, control of assault support aircraft may be passed ashore before control and coordination of direct air support aircraft. Because the various functions of aviation may be phased ashore incrementally, the ACE commander (through the LF commander) must specify those aviation functions that the DASC is ready to assume. Once the DASC is established ashore and has been passed responsibility for the coordination of direct air support functions, the DASC is responsible to the Navy TACC for the execution of direct air support functions. If a Marine TADC has been established ashore, the Navy TACC may delegate the coordination responsibility to it. After the TACC functions are phased ashore, normal MACCS command relationships are resumed.
4-20
MCWP 3-25.5
Joint Operations
Working with other United States Services requires DASC crewmembers to be familiar with the structure and employment considerations of other Service equipment, agencies, doctrine, and personnel. Control procedures for the DASCs airspace control area (or sector) must be briefed to joint service aviators, control agencies, and terminal controllers before these personnel conduct operations in DASC airspace. Procedures must be in place for those operations in which the DASC is to hand over aircraft from one joint agency (or airspace control authority) to another. The DASC must also obtain and be familiar with communications plans and orders that may affect their airspace control procedures.
4-21
Multinational Operations
DASC considerations for conducting joint operations can be aptly applied to multinational operations. In multinational operations, there is an absolute requirement to transverse the language barrier, not only in terms of the language used, but also regarding common terminology. DASC personnel must also become familiar with varying forms and formats for the ATO/ North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) air tasking message. If possible, liaison personnel from the host nation/allied country should be included in the DASC. DASC members and MASS communications experts are normally tasked to provide liaison personnel and communications links between the DASC and foreign nation direct air support agencies.
Special Considerations
Members of the Marine liaison group (MLG)/air/naval gunfire liaison company (ANGLICO) will typically provide terminal control services to CAS aircraft working with joint and multinational forces. It is important that DASC personnel make liaison with each MLG/ANGLICO team leader prior to the onset of joint/ multinational operations.
4-22
MCWP 3-25.5
Communications frequencies, airspace control procedures, DASC location, alternate and tertiary communications capabilities, etc., must be briefed and understood by both MLG/ANGLICO and DASC Marines. MLG/ANGLICO, in turn, must keep the DASC apprised of their locations and intentions throughout the operation.
4-23
and assist aircrews by gaining their confidence, providing concise and safe routing, and maintaining situational awareness. Aircrews can assist the DASC by relaying their intentions, radioing the DASC at their designated CP (or while inbound to the CP), responding to the DASCs routing/control, and providing accurate position/location information. The DASC has no radar and must rely on the information it receives from aircrews and other agencies to manage and control the designated airspace control authoritys (ACAs) sector. If the information the DASC receives is accurate and timely, the DASC will provide aircrews and other agencies with timely and accurate information. The key to effective procedural control is that the DASC must rely on information it receives from the aircrew, TACC/TADC, FSCC, and other air C2 agencies to build their situational awareness of the three-dimensional battlefield. The DASC is only as good as the information it receives.
4-24
MCWP 3-25.5
by wire and/or single-channel radio. Preferably, the DASC and the senior FSCC/FFCC are physically collocated; if not, an ASLT may be provided to the FSCC to assist in the transfer of information. Physical collocation significantly enhances coordination between the two agencies. However, electronic collocation with the FSCC is an acceptable alternative if the FSCC site is not large enough to include DASC equipment or if the site does not support the DASCs communications requirements.
Communications
The single most important siting factor for the DASC to consider is its ability to communicate. Because the DASC is a procedural control agency, it gains air situational awareness through communication with aircraft, terminal air controllers, air defense agencies, and other air C2 agencies involved with direct air support operations. As such, the primary rule for positioning the DASC is that the DASC must be located where it can communicate best to optimize its effectiveness.
Security
In addition to protection from the enemys direct fire weapons, the DASC should be located in an area that affords reliable, secure communications. Optimal use of terrain that masks the DASC from enemy positions, directional antennas, and remoting and dispersing antennas enhance communications and serve to reduce the DASCs electromagnetic signature. These considerations have both a positive and negative effect on DASC operations and must be weighed against the DASCs need for mobility, time for site setup and teardown, and ability to effectively communicate with aircraft and other ground agencies.
4-25
Mobility
The requirement to employ a mobile DASC must be addressed as early as practical in the planning cycle. Because of its extensive communications and security requirements, the DASC should remain established in a single location as long as practical. Factors influencing the DASCs displacement include movement of the GCE (and its FSCC) and enemy threat.
Future Employment
The historic employment of the DASC will not change in the foreseeable future. Traditionally, the DASC has been employed using three types of configurations: DASC, DASC(A), and ASE. The CASC provides a modular capability that allows the DASC to employ its primary ground configurations, DASC, and ASE in their doctrinal manner.
DASC Configuration
As the primary direct air support agency for the MAGTF, the DASC configuration, consisting of one or more CASC shelters and associated support equipment, will provide the operational capability to perform doctrinal functions. Capable of task organization, the DASC configuration will normally be employed in MEF or MEB operations. The mobility afforded by the CASC significantly improves the DASCs ability to move on fluid battlefields. In the HMMWV configuration, the CASC is able to establish sites previously unreachable by 5-ton vehicles; thus expanding the number of potential sites available to the DASC.
4-26
MCWP 3-25.5
When moving on the battlefield, the DASC echelons CASC shelter and support equipment necessary to perform the required mission while the remainder of the DASC relocates. This configuration is an echelon DASC.
DASC(A)
The DASC(A) may be used to support echelon operations, augment DASC communications or coordinate air operations as an extension of the DASC. The DASC(A) will normally be employed in MEF or MEB operations.
ASE
The ASE is task-organized to perform various air support control functions. Employment options can range from MEU-level operations characterized by limited assets and endurance, to a multidivision operation where the ASE is almost if not identical in capability but set apart in responsibilities and subordinate to the DASC. The ASE can function as an extension of the Navy TACC/HDC, in conjunction with the battalion TACP.
Intelligence
m NBC capability. m Night capability. m Unconventional warfare capability. m Ground order of battle:
m m
A-2
m
MCWP 3-25.5
m m m m m
Surface-to-air missile (SAM) threat. m Antiaircraft artillery (AAA) threat. m Overall ground threat capabilities assessment. Air order of battle: m Location/disposition/likely attack axes. m AAW capabilities. m Offensive air support capabilities. m Air-to-surface missile capabilities. m UAV capabilities. m Satellite overflight information (e.g., capabilities, time). m Overall air threat capabilities assessment. Electronic order of battle: m EA capabilities. m Electronic warfare support (ES) capabilities. m Overall threat EW capabilities assessment. Naval order of battle. Centers of gravity. Key vulnerabilities. Key strengths. Most likely COAs.
MAGTF
m MAGTF commanders intent/concept of operations. m AOA/AO description:
Sector limits. m Mobility/trafficability. m Weather considerations. m Rules of engagement (ROE). m Adjacent/supporting units:
m
A-3
m m
Multinational forces issues. National asset (ELINT) support: m Joint forces issues. m Liaison requirements. m Connectivity.
gets/high payoff targets). m Priority of fires and locations: m Artillery. m NSFS. m Aviation.
CAS. m Assault support. m Air defense. m OAS: m Priority of CAS. m Strip launch/airborne alert availability. m Location of assets. m Assault Support: m Priorities of assault support.
m
A-4
m
MCWP 3-25.5
CASEVAC: m Procedures/connectivity. m Medical facility location and priority. m Tactical recovery of aircraft and personnel (TRAP): m Procedures/connectivity. m TRAP zones and safe areas. m Isolated personnel report (ISOPREP) data. m Combat search and rescue (CSAR): m Procedures/connectivity. m Responsibility. m Strip alert aircraft availability, procedures, and locations. m Forward arming and refueling point (FARP) and FOB locations and connectivity. m Landing zone locations and status. m Tanker plan. m Air Reconnaissance, UAV employment plan: m RIO procedures. m Routing/deconfliction plan. m Connectivity with the GCS. m Air control procedures: m MRR/orbit areas. m Control points. m Weapon engagement zones. m RTF/lame duck procedures. m ACAs. m Fade/bug out plan. m UAV loiter area. m Hung ordnance jettison area. m RIO sequence. m Terminal control information.
A-5
Airborne C2 availability/employment. m Air defense warning condition/state of alert/weapons control status information. m ATO dissemination. m MACCS agency casualty procedures.
m
Communications
m Communications architecture. m EMCON procedures. m Chattermark procedures. m Prowords/codewords. m Execution checklists. m Cryptography:
m m m
m m m m
Required hardware/software. Changeover times. Current period for the communications-electronics operating instructions. Challenges and passwords. Required reports. Communications net prioritization/restoration. Intelligence connectivity.
Logistics Resupply
m Water/fuel/meals, ready-to-eat/batteries. m Repair parts/expendables/replacement of major items. m Personnel/administrative issues. m Transportation (e.g., airlift, sealift) considerations.
Questions
A-6
MCWP 3-25.5
Crew Brief
Crew briefs are designed to pass mission critical information, discuss pertinent procedures, and critique/recap significant events. Crew briefs should be as detailed as practical but may be abbreviated to meet mission requirements. The minimum required information to be passed in a DASC brief is specified in MCO 3501.9B. The DASCs crew briefs typically occur in three phases:
m Pre-watch brief. m Crew change brief. m Post watch debrief.
Local weather. Ingress/egress route weather. Target weather. Weather, location, and capabilities.
A-7
Light data: m Beginning of morning nautical twilight. m End of evening nautical twilight. m Sunrise/sunset. m Moonrise/moonset. m Moon phase. m Forecast. m Enemy order of battle: m Electronic order of battle: m EA/ES capabilities. m Meaconing, interference, jamming, and intrusion (MIJI) considerations. m Ground-controlled interception capability. m Air order of battle. m SAM capabilities and locations. m AAA capabilities and known locations. m Naval order of battle. m Enemy capabilities, weaknesses, and likely COAs. m CSAR/TRAP/survival, evasion, resistance, and escape information: m Safe areas: m Location. m Description. m CSAR/TRAP availability/call sign/frequency/location. m TRAP launch/divert authority. m ISOPREP data.
m
A-8
MCWP 3-25.5
Friendly Forces
m Ground units (FSCC coordinator):
m
m m m
Locations: m Forward edge of the battle area/forward line of own troops. m NSFS stations and gun-target lines. m Artillery batteries and gun-target lines. m Other known location of friendly activity. Scheme of maneuver/main effort: m Primary and alternate landing zones. m Ingress/egress routes. m Control points. m Escorts. m On-call and preplanned CAS in support of TAC(A)s. ASC(A)s. FAC(A)s. FACs. TACPs. Priority of fires and locations: m Naval fire support. m Artillery. m Aviation. Senior FSCC and location. Communications. Echelon procedures.
m m m m m
A-9
Fire support coordination measures include m Hung ordnance jettison area. m ACAs. m Fire support coordination line (FSCL). m No-fire areas (NFAs). m Ground terminal controllers. m Air (TAD/HD): m Launch and divert authority: m CAS. m Assault support. m Air defense. m Strip alert aircraft: m Time/location. m Ordnance. m Communications. m Tanker plan: m Tanker tracks. m Time-on-station. m Giveaway. m Helicopters: m Requests. m FARP locations: m Communications. m Control procedures. m Naval platforms. m TAC(A)/ASC(A). m UAV employment plan.
m
A-10
MCWP 3-25.5
m m m
Indicators. m Tactics. m Early warning detection points. TAOC location(s)/status. Communications with air defense elements/agencies. ROE/identification criteria: m Routes of flight. m Entry/exit points. Ground-based air defense (GBAD) units: m Missile engagement zones (MEZs). m Location of Stinger/Avenger teams. m HAWK location(s) and status. m Communications. High value airborne asset (HVAA) fade and bug out plan: m Supporting communications plan. m Fade/bug out criteria and authority. m Station reset criteria and authority. m Visual combat air patrol concerns/coordination.
m
Nets: m Locations, radio/antenna type, and configuration. m Encryption devices available. m Hot lines. m EMCON/EP procedures. m Restoration priorities.
A-11
Communication materials system (CMS) considerations: m Authentication codes. m Numerical codes. m Location. m Responsibility. m Crew functioning: m Positions and locations. m Relief and casualty procedures. m Net responsibilities. m Reports required and routing: m MIJI/frequency interference report. m JTAR, JTAR/S, JTEWR, ASR. m BDA/MISREP. m Intelligence/spot reports. m Pilots reports. m MACCS status. m DASC equipment status. m Joint/multinational forces reports. m Information routing procedures. m Codeword/COMSEC: m Mission: m Continue. m Change. m Cancel. m Abort. m Challenge/reply. m Mission specific code words and procedures.
m
A-12
MCWP 3-25.5
Altitudes. m Airspace restrictions. m Ordnance areas/restrictions. m Airfield operations: m Ground-controlled approach facilities. m Divert fields. m Navigation aids. m Frequencies/communications. m Fuel and ordnance availability. m Emergency recovery procedures. m Lost communications procedures.
m
Medical team: m LFMRCO. m Landing force medical regulating control team. m Hospital location: m Landing zone (LZ) and frequencies. m Alternate medical facilities. m LZ and frequencies. m CASEVAC facility. m Crew change: m Time. m Order of relief.
m
A-13
Communications Personnel
m Equipment problems experienced during the watch. m Suspected equipment failures. m Frequency disparity. m Status of communication links. m Cryptographic device software changeovers.
Plotters
m Fixed-wing aircraft currently airborne and their location. m Rotary-wing aircraft currently airborne and their location. m Current numbering for JTAR, JTAR/S, JTEWR, ASR, and m m m m m m
CASEVAC forms. Active ACAs and MEZs. Location of FOBs. Location of UAVs. Scheduled major helicopter lifts. Updates/changes to the scheme of maneuver. Active artillery positions.
A-14
MCWP 3-25.5
or time on target, etc. Changes to RIO sequence/information passed. Changes to air control procedures. Safety of flight issues. Location(s) of UAVs. Active ACAs.
working airborne aircraft. Pending BDAs. Location of TAC(A)s and FAC(A)s. Next JTAR, JTAR/S, JTEWR number. Air defense warning and weapons release conditions. Safety of flight information. UAV locations.
A-15
Helicopter Director
m Status of aircraft airborne, on alert, and diverted. m Status of preplanned/immediate missions. m Status of ongoing /CASEVACs. m Status of ongoing ASRs. m Location(s) of ASC(A), FAC(A), and/or airborne mission m m m m
commander (if applicable). Changes to routing procedures. Locations of aircraft in LZs. Location of CSAR/TRAP/CASEVAC package(s). Air defense warning condition and weapons release status.
A-16
MCWP 3-25.5
bers to be assigned. Status of current JTARs,JTAR/Ss, JTEWRs, ASRs, and CASEVAC requests. Expected BDAs to receive or mission status to pass. Units not answering on net including station call signs. Status of troop lifts. Status of incomplete requests for mission information.
Crew Chief
m Pertinent information regarding DASC crewmembers. m Status of ongoing missions. m Changes and updates in fire support coordination measures. m Communications support/equipment status. m Changes of radios/nets/positions due to equipment problems. m Significant events. m Outstanding JTARs, JTAR/Ss, JTEWRs. m Outstanding ASRs. m Outstanding CASEVAC requests. m Changes/updates available from intelligence representatives.
strip alert).
m Pending immediate requests for support. m Changes to scheme of maneuver.
A-17
m Changes to priority of fires. m MIJI incidences reported. m Downed/distressed aircraft. m Any significant past, present or future events that could
impact on operations. m Status of diverted aircraft. m Availability of strip alert aircraft. m Current CASEVAC procedures.
procedures.
m Reviewing the amount of radio traffic for possible consolida-
Appendix B Training
Every Marine Corps leader has the responsibility to establish and conduct technical and tactical training for Marines to successfully accomplish the units mission. The tools available to assist leaders in establishing the base for an effective training plan are relevance, standardization, efficiency, and specificity. Due to the complexities of amphibious, joint, and multinational operations, the importance of individual-, crew-, and unit-level training for DASC controllers and operators cannot be understated. The impact from meaningful, quality training reflects on a Marines proficiency.
Individual Training
DASC controller and operator training requirements are standardized by MCO P3500.19B, Training and Readiness (T&R) Manual, Volume V, Marine Air Command and Control System (MACCS). It specifies training events and position requirements necessary for controllers and operators to progress through various level qualifications. Follow-on formal training is available to those Marines who demonstrate military occupational specialty (MOS) proficiency.
B-2
MCWP 3-25.5
Procedural control of aircraft. Functions and roles of various DASC crewmembers. EW. Nuclear, biological, and chemical (NBC) defense in the DASC.
Operation and employment of DASC equipment. EW. NBC defense in the DASC. DASC crew training.
Graduate-Level Training
Air support officers (MOS 7208) exhibiting requisite technical and tactical proficiency may be selected by their commands to attend the Weapons and Tactics Instructor (WTI) Course. WTI provides students advanced training and practical application on planning, integration, and execution of the six functions of
B-3
Marine aviation. MOS 7208 students receive specific instruction in the following areas:
l l l
Prerequisites for WTI attendance include SAD qualification with MEB exercise/operation experience. Upon completion, students receive the MOS 7277 (WTI) designation. A similar program, the Weapons and Tactics Crew Chief Instructor (WTCCI) Course, is available for DASC crew chiefs. The WTCCI Course addresses the same basic curriculum as the 7208 course, but the practical application is geared toward the DASC crew chief. Prerequisites include qualification as a crew chief and experience in a MEB exercise/operation.
Follow-on Schools
Additional formal schools are available for field grade officers including the WTI Commanders Course and WTI Refresher Course. Held at Marine Corps Air Station, Yuma, AZ, the WTI Commanders Course provides field grade officers with an opportunity to examine and discuss issues affecting the MACCS and considerations for MACCS employment. The WTI Refresher Course is conducted for WTIs who have been out of the FMF or serving in a non-DASC-related billet. The course is designed to update the WTI on current and evolving weapons, tactics, and threat information.
B-4
MCWP 3-25.5
Other Schools
Other courses of instruction applicable to DASC operator proficiency are available from the expeditionary warfare training group (EWTG). Instruction from EWTG may be conducted at the schoolhouse or from onsite mobile training teams. EWTG periodically provides a list of available courses.
On-the-Job Training
Most DASC controller and operator MOS training is conducted at the squadron level. Requirements for both academic and practical application training and position qualification for DASC controllers and operators are specified in MCO P3500.19B. A specific T&R syllabus exists for MOS 7208 controllers and MOS 7242 operators. Tracking of individual readiness is computed by the aviation T&R information management system (ATRIMS). DASC controller and operator training are conducted at four progressive levels. Completion of each level equates to reaching a given combat readiness percentage (CRP). An outline of the phases, position qualifications reached, and corresponding individual CRP is outlined below.
B-5
Special Qualifications
The instructor-under-training syllabus is designed to develop proficiency in instructional procedures and techniques. At the completion of this training, the individual should be capable of describing/demonstrating the training objectives of the syllabus. Instructor training is oriented toward the functional areas of either air support control instructor or threat tactics instructor. Students must complete the appropriate courses and be certified by a qualified DASC WTI. Once certified, the individual will be designated by the commanding officer in writing.
B-6
MCWP 3-25.5
Crew Training
The DASC crew is the key to effective and efficient air support control. The MASS trains DASC crews through live exercises, command post exercises (CPXs), and DASC drills. The DASC drill consists of a DASC crew and a simulator cell. The simulator cell is usually a mirror image of the DASC crew and is staffed by more experienced personnel who execute the scenario as the FSC, aircrews, TACC, TACPs, etc., and assist in evaluating the performance of the DASC crewmembers. In addition, one or more experienced MOS 72XXs observe from inside the DASC to objectively evaluate the performance of the crewmembers and the crew coordination. The DASC drill and post-drill debrief are essential to build fundamental skills and crew coordination.
Unit Training
Unit training involves that training required to prepare the MASS to perform its mission. Unit training can take on many forms including CPXs and field training exercises (FTXs). During unit training, MASS personnel are intimately involved in preparing training plans and coordinating with higher, adjacent, and subordinate C2 and support elements.
B-7
Training Evaluation
The success of individual, crew, and unit training must be qualitatively measured to identify training deficiencies and create a baseline for designing future training. Evaluation tools to identify training deficiencies are MCO 3501.9B and MCO P3500.19B. The MCCRES is a standardized, Headquarters Marine Corps-directed evaluation program designed to measure a units warfighting readiness. It specifies mission performance standards that agencies are expected to perform during their wartime mission. MCO P3500.19B specifies individual performance standards.
Appendix C Glossary
Section I. Acronyms and Abbreviations
AAA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . antiaircraft artillery AAW. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . antiair warfare ACA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . airspace control authority ACE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . aviation combat element AF . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .amphibious force AM . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . amplitude modulation ANGLICO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .air/naval gunfire liaison company AO. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . area of operations AOA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .amphibious objective area AOC . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . air operations center ASC. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . air support coordinator ASC(A) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . assault support coordinator (airborne) ASCOC . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . air support control officer course ASE. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . air support element ASLT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . air support liaison team ASNO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . air support net operator ASOC . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . air support operations center ASOOC. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . air support operations operator course ASR. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . assault support request ATC . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . air traffic control ATF. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . amphibious task force ATO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . air tasking order ATRIMS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . aviation training and readiness information management system
C-2
MCWP 3-25.5
BDA. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .battle damage assessment C2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . command and control C2W. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . command and control warfare CAC2S . . . . . . . common aviation command and control system CAS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . close air support CASC. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . communications air support central CASEVAC . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . casualty evacuation CDS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . communications distribution system C-E. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .communications-electronics CMS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . communication materials system COA. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . course of action COMM . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . communications COMSEC. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . communications security CP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . control point CPX . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . command post exercise CRP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . combat readiness percentage CSAR. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .combat search and rescue CTT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .commanders tactical terminal CWAR . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . continuous wave acquisition radar DAS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . deep air support DASC . . . . . . . . . . . . direct air support center (MACCS agency) DASC(A). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . DASC (airborne) EA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . electronic attack ELINT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . electronic intelligence EMCON. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . emission control EOB . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . enemy order of battle EP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .electronic protection ES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . electronic warfare support EW. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .electronic warfare EWTG . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .expeditionary warfare training group
C-3
FAC . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . forward air controller FAC(A) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .forward air controller (airborne) FARP. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . forward arming and refueling point FFCC. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . force fires coordination center FM . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . frequency modulation FMF. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Fleet Marine Force FMFM . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Fleet Marine Force manual FOB . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . forward operating base FSC . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . fire support coordinator FSCC. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . fire support coordination center FTX. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . field training exercise G-2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .intelligence staff officer/organization GBAD . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ground-based air defense GCA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ground-controlled approach GCE. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ground combat element GCS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .ground control station HD . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .helicopter director HDC . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . helicopter direction center HE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .high explosive HF . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . high frequency HMD . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . high mobility downsized HMMWV . . . . . . . .high mobility, multipurpose wheeled vehicle HVAA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . high value airborne asset ISOPREP. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .isolated personnel report JSTE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . joint system training exercise JTAR . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .joint tactical air strike request JTAR/S . . . . . . .joint tactical air reconnaissance and surveillance JTEWR . . . . . . . . . . . . . . joint tactical electronic warfare request
C-4
MCWP 3-25.5
KB . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .kilobyte LAN. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . local area network LF . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .landing force LFMRCO. . . . . . landing force medical regulating control officer LOS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .line of sight LZ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . landing zone MACCS . . . . . . . . . . . . . Marine air command and control system MACG . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Marine air control group MAGTF . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Marine air-ground task force MAPP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Marine aviation planning problem MASS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Marine air support squadron MCCRES. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Marine Corps Combat Readiness Evaluation System MCHS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Marine Corps common hardware suite MCO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Marine Corps order MCWP. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Marine Corps warfighting publication MEB . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Marine expeditionary brigade MEF. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Marine expeditionary force MEU . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Marine expeditionary unit MEZ. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . missile engagement zone MIJI . . . . . . . . . meaconing, interference, jamming, and intrusion MISREP. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .mission report MISTEX. . . . . . . MACCS integrated simulation training exercise MLG . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Marine liaison group MOS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .military occupational specialty MRC . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . mobile radio communication MRR . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . minimum-risk route MRT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . medical regulating team
C-5
NATO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . North Atlantic Treaty Organization NAU . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .network access unit NBC . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . nuclear, biological, and chemical NSFS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . naval surface fire support NWP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . naval warfare publication OAS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . offensive air support OIC . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . officer in charge OPS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . operations RAOC . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . rear area operations center RFI . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . request for information ROE. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . rules of engagement RTF . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . return to force S-2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .intelligence staff officer/organization S-6 . . . . . . . . . . communications and information systems officer SACC . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . supporting arms coordination center SAD. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . senior air director SAM . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . surface-to-air missile SNCOIC . . . . . . . . . . . . staff noncommissioned officer in charge SWO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . senior watch officer T&R . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . training and readiness TAC(A) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . tactical air coordinator (airborne) TACC . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . tactical air command center (USMC); tactical air control center (USN) TACP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . tactical air control party TAD . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . tactical air director TADC . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . tactical air direction center TAOC . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . tactical air operations center TRAP . . . . . . . . . . . . . tactical recovery of aircraft and personnel
C-6
MCWP 3-25.5
UAV . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .unmanned aerial vehicle UCD. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . user control device UHF . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ultrahigh frequency UNAAF . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . United Action Armed Forces VHF . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . very high frequency WEZ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .weapon engagement zone WTCCI . . . . . . . . . . . . weapons and tactics crew chief instructor WTI . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . weapons and tactics instructor
C-7
C-8
MCWP 3-25.5
area of responsibilityThe geographical area associated with a combatant command within which a combatant commander has authority to plan and conduct operations. Also called AOR. (JP 1-02) casualty evacuationThe movement of the sick, wounded, or injured. It begins at the point of injury or the onset of disease. It includes movement both to and between medical treatment facilities. All units have an evacuation capability. Any vehicle may be used to evacuate casualties. If a medical vehicle is not used it should be replaced with one at the first opportunity. Similarly, aeromedical evacuation should replace surface evacuation at the first opportunity. (MCRP 5-12C) close air supportAir action by fixed- and rotary-wing aircraft against hostile targets which are in close proximity to friendly forces and which require detailed integration of each air mission with the fire and movement of those forces. Also called CAS. (JP 1-02) combined armsThe full integration of combat arms in such a way that to counteract one, the enemy must become more vulnerable to another. (MCRP 5-12C) commander, amphibious task forceThe Navy officer designated in the order initiating the amphibious operation as the commander of the amphibious task force. Also called CATF. (JP 3-02) commander, landing forceThe officer designated in the order initiating the amphibious operation as the commander of the landing force for an amphibious operation. Also called CLF. (JP 3-02)
C-9
deep air supportAir action against enemy targets at such a distance from friendly forces that detailed integration of each mission with fire and movement of friendly forces is not required. Deep air support missions are flown on either side of the fire support coordination line; the lack of a requirement for close coordination with the fire and movement of friendly forces is the qualifying factor. Also called DAS. (MCRP 5-12C) direct air supportAir support flown in direct response to a specific request from the supported unit. (MCRP 5-12C) direct air support centerThe principal air control agency of the U.S. Marine air command and control system responsible for the direction and control of air operations directly supporting the ground combat element. It processes and coordinates requests for immediate air support and coordinates air missions requiring integration with ground forces and other supporting arms. It normally collocates with the senior fire support coordination center within the ground combat element and is subordinate to the tactical air command center. Also called DASC. (JP 1-02) direct air support center (airborne)An airborne aircraft equipped with the necessary staff personnel, communications, and operations facilities to function as a direct air support center. Also called DASC(A). (JP 1-02) emission controlThe selective and controlled use of electromagnetic, acoustic, or other emitters to optimize command and control capabilities while minimizing, for operations security (OPSEC): a. detection by enemy sensors; b. mutual interference among friendly systems; and/or c. enemy interference with the ability to execute a military deception plan. Also called EMCON. (JP 1-02)
C-10
MCWP 3-25.5
fire support coordination centerA single location in which are centralized communications facilities and personnel incident to the coordination of all forms of fire support. Also called FSCC. (JP 1-02) fire support coordination lineA fire support coordinating measure that is established and adjusted by appropriate land or amphibious force commanders within their boundaries in consultation with superior, subordinate, supporting, and affected commanders. Fire support coordination lines (FSCLs) facilitate the expeditious attack of surface targets of opportunity beyond the coordinating measure. An FSCL does not divide an area of operations by defining a boundary between close and deep operations or a zone for close air support. The FSCL applies to all fires of air, land, and sea-based weapon systems using any type of ammunition. Forces attacking targets beyond an FSCL must inform all affected commanders in sufficient time to allow necessary reaction to avoid fratricide. Supporting elements attacking targets beyond the FSCL must ensure that the attack will not produce adverse effects on, or to the rear of, the line. Short of an FSCL, all air-to-ground and surface-to-surface attack operations are controlled by the appropriate land or amphibious force commander. The FSCL should follow well defined terrain features. Coordination of attacks beyond the FSCL is especially critical to commanders of air, land, and special operations forces. In exceptional circumstances, the inability to conduct this coordination will not preclude the attack of targets beyond the FSCL. However, failure to do so may increase the risk of fratricide and could waste limited resources. Also called FSCL. (JP 1-02) helicopter direction centerIn amphibious operations, the primary direct control agency for the helicopter group/unit commander operating under the overall control of the tactical air control center. (Joint Pub 1-02) The helicopter direction center is
C-11
an agency within the Navy tactical air control system and is positioned afloat. The helicopter direction center is not a Marine air command and control system agency, but it interacts closely with the direct air support center in the control of helicopter operations between ship and shore. The helicopter direction center also interacts closely with the air support element of the Marine expeditionary unit aviation combat element. Also called HDC. (MCRP 5-12C) MESHnetA communications distribution system that allows an operator to interface with radios, telephones, intercom, and computer networks. offensive air supportThose air operations conducted against enemy installations, facilities, and personnel to directly assist the attainment of MAGTF objectives by the destruction of enemy resources or the isolation of the enemys military forces. Also called OAS. (MCRP 5-12C) positive control1. A method of airspace control which relies on positive identification, tracking, and direction of aircraft within an airspace, conducted with electronic means by an agency having the authority and responsibility therein. (JP 1-02) 2. The tactical control of aircraft by a designated control unit, whereby the aircraft receives orders affecting its movements which immediately transfer responsibility for the safe navigation of the aircraft to the unit issuing such orders. (MCRP 5-12C under Marine air command and control system) procedural controlA method of airspace control which relies on a combination of previously agreed and promulgated orders and procedures. (JP 1-02)
C-12
MCWP 3-25.5
rules of engagementDirectives issued by competent military authority which delineate the circumstances and limitations under which United States forces will initiate and/or continue combat engagement with other forces encountered. Also called ROE. (JP 1-02) sectorAn area designated by boundaries within which a unit operates, and for which it is responsible. (JP 1-02, Part 1 of a 2part definition) supporting arms coordination centerA single location on board an amphibious command ship in which all communication facilities incident to the coordination of fire support of the artillery, air, and naval gunfire are centralized. This is the naval counterpart to the fire support coordination center utilized by the landing force. Also called SACC. (JP 1-02) suppression of enemy air defensesThat activity which neutralizes, destroys, or temporarily degrades surface-based enemy air defenses by destructive and/or disruptive means. Also called SEAD. (JP 1-02) tactical air command centerThe principal U.S. Marine Corps air command and control agency from which air operations and air defense warning functions are directed. It is the senior agency of the Marine air command and control system which serves as the operational command post of the aviation combat element commander. It provides the facility from which the aviation combat element commander and his battle staff plan, supervise, coordinate, and execute all current and future air operations in support of the Marine air-ground task force. The tactical air command center can provide integration, coordination, and direction of joint and combined air operations. Also called Marine TACC. (JP 1-02)
C-13
tactical air control centerThe principal air operations installation (ship-based) from which all aircraft and air warning functions of tactical air operations are controlled. Also called Navy TACC. (JP 1-02) tactical air direction centerAn air operations installation under the overall control of the tactical air control center (afloat)/ tactical air command center, from which aircraft and air warning service functions of tactical air operations in an area of concern are directed. Also called TADC. (JP 1-02) tactical air operations centerThe principal air control agency of the U.S. Marine air command and control system responsible for airspace control and management. It provides real time surveillance, direction, positive control, and navigational assistance for friendly aircraft. It performs real time direction and control of all antiair warfare operations, to include manned interceptors and surface-to-air weapons. It is subordinate to the tactical air command center. Also called TAOC. (JP 1-02) terminal controlThe authority to direct the maneuver of aircraft which are delivering ordnance, passengers, or cargo to a specific location or target. Terminal control is a type of air control. (JP 1-02) unmanned aerial vehicleA powered, aerial vehicle that does not carry a human operator, uses aerodynamic forces to provide vehicle lift, can fly autonomously or be piloted remotely, can be expendable or recoverable, and can carry a lethal or nonlethal payload. Ballistic or semiballistic vehicles, cruise missiles, and artillery projectiles are not considered unmanned aerial vehicles. Also called UAV. (JP 1-02)
D-2
MCWP 3-25.5
D-3
3501.9B