Scribd
Upload
328 views4 pages

Kuipers Nga Uru CC

Dutch referee Bjorn Kuipers was disappointed with his performance. Referees made a number of crucial decisions in the match. Dutch official steven gerrard missed a penalty.

Uploaded by

The3rdTeam
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
328 views4 pages

Kuipers Nga Uru CC

Dutch referee Bjorn Kuipers was disappointed with his performance. Referees made a number of crucial decisions in the match. Dutch official steven gerrard missed a penalty.

Uploaded by

The3rdTeam
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 4

Unofficial Referee Observers Report

rbitro Internacional & The Third Team

(NGA) NIGERIA

1:2

URUGUAY (URU)

Group B, 20 June 2013, 19:00 Local Time Arena Fonte Nova, Salvador, Brazil Match Officials Referee Assistant Referee 1 Assistant Referee 2 Fourth Official Reserve AR Blog Referee Observer
1 2 3

Name Bjrn Kuipers Sander van Roekel Erwin Zeinstra Pedro Proena Bertino Miranda Carlos S.

Origin NED NED NED POR POR COL

Mark1 8,4 8,3 8,9 8,3

Mark2 ---------

Difficulty3 Normal Normal Challenging Normal

Final mark according to evaluation scale. Expected level for AARs and fourth official is 8.0, crucial mistake 7.7! Mark if the final mark had not been influenced by a crucial mistake (only in case of a crucial mistake, to be held empty if no crucial mistake occurred). Difficulty has to be integrated into the final mark. Levels of difficulty are: normal, challenging and very challenging. 4 Blog-Referee Observer =Inofficial referee observer appointed by the blog administrator.

Evaluation scale
(for referee, ARs and fourth official)

Description of the Marks Excellent. Very good. Important decision(s) correctly taken. Good. Expected level. Satisfactory with small areas for improvement. Satisfactory with important areas for improvement. One clear and important mistake, otherwise 8.3 or above. One clear and important mistake, otherwise 8.0 8.2. Below expectation, poor control, significant point(s) for improvement. Disappointing. Below expectation with one and clear important mistake or a performance with two or more clear and important mistakes. Unacceptable.

9.0 10.0 8.5 8.9 8.3 8.4 8.2 8.0 8.1 7.9 7.8 7.5 7.7 7.0 7.4 6.0 6.9

Small description of the match (extra-ordinary incidents etc.): Expected match for dutch referee Bjrn Kuipers, who recently took charge of the 2013 UEFA Eurpoa League Final in his own country between Chelsea and Benfica. The match was supposed to be the key match of this group B of the Confederations Cup, but for dutch ref Bjrn Kuipers it was not a challenge. The Arena had an ok atmosphere, but it was nothing he had not seen, the weather conditions where ok to play football.

Unofficial Referee Observers Report

rbitro Internacional & The Third Team

Referee
Crucial Decisions (refer to penalty kicks, sending-off situations etc.) Minute and Description of the Scene / Assessment of the referees decision There were no crucial calls during the match in the penalty areas and there also wasn't any red card offences. However his AR#2 Zeinstra had some difficult calls that maybe be considered as crucial and will be explained in his analysis.

Basic Observations (refer to the general application of the LotG, highlight the referees tactical approach, personality, match control, management of the teams and players, teamwork etc.). Please deploy short but precise and detailed sentences! Positive Points 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Control of the match, the match was fully in the control of the referee Excellent physical shape Positioning and movements, based on 2. Offside calls made by the assistants Team WorkCard management, all were shown with the same criteria, and there were not really clear situation in which someone could ask for an other caution.

Points for Improvement End of the times, the last minutes of both where the minutes in which he made 1. more mistakes. (41-45 minutes and 85)

Unofficial Referee Observers Report

rbitro Internacional & The Third Team

The referees character Physical Aspects Fitness / Stamina Always close to play without inferfering with it Flexible diagonal movement Positioning at set pieces Efficient positioning, having a good angle of vision to play Close to the penalty area, if needed Tactical Approach Description very lenient lenient medium X Yes Consistency in the tactical approach / style The tactical approach suited to the requirements of the match / the match benefitted from the tactical approach of the referee Ability to adapt the tactical approach if needed X X X So-so No X X strict very strict + X X X X Expected -

Further observations (peculiarities of the referee revealing his character) Kuipers seems to be a very relaxed and self-confident referee, cool and relaxed would be the right word to describe him.

Unofficial Referee Observers Report

rbitro Internacional & The Third Team

Assistant Referee 1
Please assess the first assistant referees performance. Minute and Description of the Scene / Assessment of the ARs behaviour Full Good cooperation with the referee and good offside detection, however there is Time no special call to remark.

Assistant Referee 2
Please assess the second assistant referees performance. Minute and Description of the Scene / Assessment of the ARs behaviour Good cooperation, but to remark was his excellent offside detecion, 7 call to do and all of them were perfect (min 4-7-18-20-44-73-93)

Fourth Official
Please assess the fourth officials performance. Minute and Description of the Scene / Assessment of the fourth officials behaviour No special remark, good work.

You might also like