Knowhow

About Bondgraphs Simulation and C ontrol Application Areas

Info home
Introduction Power variables Standard elements Power directions Bond numbers Causality System equations Activation Example models Art of creating models Fields Mixed-causalled fields Differential causality Algebraic loops Causal loops Duality Multi and Vector bond graphs Suggested readings

Knowledgebase & Tools Books

Software

Knowledge Sharing Bibliography

Forum

Generation of system equations

In this section the method of generation of system equations is discussed. From an augmented bond graph, using a step by step procedure, system equations may be generated. We take the model of a simple single degree of freedom mass-spring-damper system as the starting point.

open in browser PRO version

Are you a developer? Try out the HTML to PDF API

pdfcrowd.com

The differential equations describing the dynamics of the system are written in terms of the states of the system. All storage elements (I and C) correspond to stored state variables (P for momentum and Q for displacement, respectively) and equations are written for their time derivatives (i.e. effort and flow). These equations are derived in four steps as described below.

Observe what the elements (sources, I's, C's, and R's) are giving to the system and write down their equations looking at the causalities and using

open in browser PRO version

Are you a developer? Try out the HTML to PDF API

pdfcrowd.com

variables for strong bonds. Write down equations for the junctions and the two-port elements for the variables for the strong bonds. Replace the variables, which are expressed in terms of states in other equations. Continue sorting and replacement till the right side of the entire set of equations are expressed in terms of states and system parameters only. If some equations are still not completely reduced, there is the existence of some kind of a loop (algebraic loop, causal loop or differential causality, as shall be discussed later). Try solving those as a set of linear equations either through substitution or matrix inversion. And finally, erase all trivial equations other than those for derivatives of state variables and write them in terms of state variables. Thus using the following steps, the equations for the above system would be

Step 1 : e1=SE1 f3=P3/M3 e2=K2*Q2 e4=R4*f4=R4*f3 (by junction rule, f4=f3 and strong bond number is 3) Step 2 : e1-e2-e3-e4=0

or

e3=e1-e2-e4

Step 3 : e1=SE1 f3=P3/M3 e2=K2*Q2 e4=R4*P3/M3 e3=SE1-K2*Q2-R4*P3/M3 open in browser PRO version Are you a developer? Try out the HTML to PDF API

pdfcrowd.com

Step 4 : DQ2=f2=f3 DP3=e3 where prefix 'D' stand for time derivative d/dt leads to DQ2=P3/M3 DP3=SE1-K2*Q2-R4*P3/M3 The difference between equations derived from bond graphs and otherwise are that there will be `N' sets of first order differential equations, where `N' is the number of states. The term, number of states means the number of lumped parameter storage elements I and C with integral causality present in a system. The equation of motion for the system discussed above by traditional method is : m d 2 x/dt2 + r * dx/dt + k*x = F(t). The two state equations derived from a bond graph model (dropping suffixes) are dP/dt = -r/m * P - k*Q + SE, dQ/dt = 1/m*P, where, P is momentum of m*dx/dt, Q is displacement or x and SE is F(t)). From the second equation, P=m*dQ/dt, which when replaced in the first leads to m*d 2 Q/dt2 = -r*dQ/dt - k*Q + F(t). This equation corresponds to that derived through traditional method after rearrangement. However, manual derivation of equations for larger systems is not all that open in browser PRO version Are you a developer? Try out the HTML to PDF API

pdfcrowd.com

simple. For instance, derivation of system differential equations for the animated bond graph model discussed in the causality section after proper causalling would lead to formation of the so called algebraic loops. Similarly, complexities and errors of various types, like Causal loops, Power loops, and Differential Causalities may exist in the model of a system. The method for derivation of their equations is described in corresponding sections. Example -2 Here we take another example of a system with two-ports, whose model is shown below.

open in browser PRO version

Are you a developer? Try out the HTML to PDF API

pdfcrowd.com

Then we follow the normal equation derivation steps.

Step 1 : e 1 = SE1 f2 = P2/M2 e 3 = R 3*f3=R 3*f2=R 3*P2/M2 f6 = P6/M6 e 11 = K11*Q 11 e 12 = R 12*f12 = R 12*f9 f13 = P13/M13 Step 2 : f1 = f2 = f4 = f3 = P3/M3 e 2 = e 1 - e 3 - e 4 = SE1 - R 3*P2/M2 - e 4 e 4 = MU*f5 = MU*f6 = MU*P6/M6 e 5 = MU*f4 = MU*f2 = MU*P2/M2 f5 = f7 = f6 = P6/M6 e6 = e5 - e7 f8 = r*f7 = r*P6/M6 e 7 = r*e 8 = r*e 9 e 8 = e 10 = e 9 f9 = f8 - f10 = r*P6/M6 - f13 = r*P6/M6 - P13/M13 f10 = f14 = f13 = P13/M13 e 13 = e 10 + e 14 = e 9 + SE14 f11 = f12 = f9 e 9 = e 11 + e 12 = K11*Q 11 + R 12*f9 Step 3 : e 1 = SE1 f2 = P2/M2 e 3 = R 3*f3=R 3*f2=R 3*P2/M2 f6 = P6/M6 e 11 = K11*Q 11 e 12 = R 12*f9 = R 12*(r*P6/M6 - P13/M13) f13 = P13/M13

open in browser PRO version

Are you a developer? Try out the HTML to PDF API

pdfcrowd.com

f1 = f2 = f4 = f3 = P3/M3 e 2 = SE1 - R 3*P2/M2 - e 4 = SE1 - R 3*P2/M2 - MU*P6/M6 e 4 = MU*f5 = MU*f6 = MU*P6/M6 e 5 = MU*f4 = MU*f2 = MU*P2/M2 f5 = f7 = f6 = P6/M6 e 6 = e 5 - e 7 = MU*P2/M2 - r*(e 11 + e 12) = MU*P2/M2 - r*(K11*Q 11 + R 12*(r*P6/M6 - P13/M13)) f8 = r*f7 = r*P6/M6 e 7 = r*e 8 = r*e 9 = r*(e 11+e 12) = r*(K11*Q 11 + R 12*(r*P6/M6 - P13/M13)) e 8 = e 10 = e 9 = e 11+e 12 = K11*Q 11 + R 12*(r*P6/M6 - P13/M13) f9 = f8 - f10 = r*P6/M6 - f13 = r*P6/M6 - P13/M13 f10 = f14 = f13 = P13/M13 e 13 = e 10 + e 14 = e 9 + SE14 = K11*Q 11 + R 12*(r*P6/M6 - P13/M13) + SE14 f11 = f12 = f9 = r*P6/M6 - P13/M13 e 9 = e 11 + e 12 = K11*Q 11 + R 12*f9 = K11*Q 11 + R 12*(r*P6/M6 - P13/M13) Step 4 : DP2 = SE1 - R 3*P2/M2 - MU*P6/M6 DP6 = MU*P2/M2 - r*(K11*Q 11 + R 12*(r*P6/M6 - P13/M13)) DP13 = K11*Q 11 + R 12*(r*P6/M6 - P13/M13) + SE14 DQ 11 = r*P6/M6 - P13/M13

In matrix form, these equations may be written as d{Y}/dt = [A]{Y} + [B]{u}, where, {Y} is a vector of states (P2,P6,P13 and Q11), [A] is square matrix, {u} is the array of sources (SE1 and SE14} and [B] is a matrix of dimension N x M; N being the number of states and M being the number of sources. The matrices [A] and [B] are;

-R3/M2 MU/M2 A= 0.0 0.0

open in browser PRO version

-MU/M6 -R12*r2/M6 R12*r/M6 r/M6

0.0 R12*r2/M13 -R12/M13 -1/M13

-r*K11 K11 0 ,
0.0

Are you a developer? Try out the HTML to PDF API

pdfcrowd.com

 B=

1 0 0 0

0 1 0.
0

Activation
Some bonds in a bond graph may be only information carriers. These bonds are not power bonds. Such bonds, where one of the factors of the power is masked are called Activated bonds. As an example, let the system shown in the figure below be considered.

open in browser PRO version

Are you a developer? Try out the HTML to PDF API

pdfcrowd.com

Here the velocity pick-up only carries the information of velocity to the amplifier through which an electro-magnetic exciter applies force proportional to velocity on the mass and the exciter does not carry the information of velocity and impose it back on the mass as an reactive force. So on the bond representing the velocity pick-up the information of force must be masked and on the bond representing the exciter the information of the flow must be masked. A full arrow somewhere on the bonds shows that some information is masked and what information is masked may be written near that full arrow. According to this convention the bond graph of the system is shown to the right of the system drawn above. The bond number 4 in the figure is the pick-up bond where information of effort is masked and in bond number 5, which is the exciter bond, the flow is activated. The concept of activation is very significant to depict feedback control systems. The term activation initially seems a misnomer. However, Paynter's idea was based on the fact that though the information of a factor of power is masked on one end, an activated bond on the other end can impart infinite power which is derived from a tank circuit used for both the measurement or actuation device (for instance, the pick-up, the amplifier and the exciter, all have external power sources).

open in browser PRO version

Are you a developer? Try out the HTML to PDF API

pdfcrowd.com

In the system shown above, a D.C. motor with externally energized field is driving an elastic shaft with two disks and with a fluctuating resistive load. The speed, picked up by a tachometer is fed-back to control the speed of the motor by adjusting the armature current (increasing voltage alternatively). The bond graph for this system is drawn as shown below.

Observers Additional states can be added for measurement of any factor of power on a bond graph model using the Observer storage elements. An effort activated Celement would observe the time integral of flow (and consequently flow),

open in browser PRO version

Are you a developer? Try out the HTML to PDF API

pdfcrowd.com

whereas a flow activated I-element would observe the generalized momentum (and consequently effot). Activated elements are percieved conceptual instrumentations on a model. They dont interfere in the dynamics of the system (i.e. their corresponding states never appear on the right-hand side of any state equation. A system with N states, M sources and L observers would have the state equations of the form d/dt{Y} = [A]{Y} + [B]{u} , d/dy{Z} = [C]{Y} + [D] {u} , whre {Y} is a vector of true states, {Z} is the vector of observed states, {u} is a vector of sources, [A] is MxM matrix, [B] is MxN matrix, [C] is ZxM matrix and [D] is ZxN matrix. Here is an example of a single-degree-of-freedom system with instrumentations, whose model with observer elements is shown below.

open in browser PRO version

Are you a developer? Try out the HTML to PDF API

pdfcrowd.com

The conceptual instrumentations shown here, assumes a (thus measuring displacement and not generating any inductive coil within which the segments of the damper measurement of force) without any reaction on the equations for this model can be derived as shown below.
Step 1 : f1 = SF1 e 3 = K3*Q 3 e 5 = R 5*f5 f6 = 0 e 9 = SE9 e8 = 0 e 10 = 0 f12 = P12/M12

spring of zero stiffness reactive effort) and an move to induce emf (a damper segment. The

open in browser PRO version

Are you a developer? Try out the HTML to PDF API

pdfcrowd.com

e 11 = MU*f10 = MU*f12 = MU*P12/M12 Step 2 : e 12 = e 7 + e 9 - e 8 + e 11 - e 10 = e 2 + SE9 + MU*P12/M12 f2 = f1 - f7 = SF1 - P12/M12 f5 = f4 - f6 = f4 = f2 = SF1 - P12/M12 e 2 = e 3 + e 4 = e 3 + e 5 = K3*Q 3 + R 5*f5 = K3*Q 3 + SF1 - P12/M12 Step 3 : e 12 = K3*Q 3 + R 5*(SF1-P12/M12) + SE9 + MU*P12/M12 e 5 = R 5*(SF1 - P12/M12) Step 4 :

The State equations are

DP12 = e 12 = K3*Q 3 + R 5*(SF1-P12/M12) + SE9 + MU*P12/M12 DQ 3 = f3 = f2 = SF1 - P12/M12

and the observer equations are

DP6 = e 6 = e 5 = R 5*(SF1 - P12/M12) DQ 8 = f8 = f12 = P12/M12

Bond graph modeling

A simple mechanical system shown in the figure below is considered here for explaining the modeling procedure.

open in browser PRO version

Are you a developer? Try out the HTML to PDF API

pdfcrowd.com

The output from the pump would be flow and pressure, while the input would be torque and angular velocity applied to the pump shaft. The input power is provided by an electric motor. The power flow diagram is shown in the figure below.

Two transformations are identified. First from electric power to mechanical power through the electric motor; followed by the mechanical power to the fluid power through the pump. In the next step to construct the model, the components are to be looked into more details. In this simple analysis of the pump it has its own moving parts (inertia); oil flow has got its own compressibility (capacitance) because of which it can store energy; pump has leakage due to its geometric tolerance and friction between the moving parts (resistance) through which it can dissipate energy. The bond graph of the system with power directions and causality is shown below.

open in browser PRO version

Are you a developer? Try out the HTML to PDF API

pdfcrowd.com

A two degrees of freedom mechanical system and its corresponding Bond graph model shown below can be explained in the following manner.

open in browser PRO version

Are you a developer? Try out the HTML to PDF API

pdfcrowd.com

The bottom mass velocity is same as the rate of stretching of the spring and damper connected to the ground. So, these are modeled as being connected to the 1-junction. The middle spring and damper experience components of force, say F1 and F2, respectively such that F=F1+F2, i.e., the force felt by the bottom mass, the spring and damper in combination and the top mass is equal. Alternatively, the distortion of the spring and the damper is dependent on relative motion of the masses. Hence, one can easily smell the presence of a force pass or flow summation junction, in other words the 0-junction here. Further, this 0 junction has three branches corresponding to three components of distribution of effort. Another 1-junction appears in the right, that signifies the equal relative velocity (i.e., rate of compression here considering the power directions) felt by the middle spring and the damper. The 1-junction at the top depicts the coherent motion of the forcing device with the top mass. For the above system, alternative methods can be applied to arrive at a bond graph model, that may apparently look different. However, the final equations derived from different models lead to the same set. It may be noted that bond graphs for mechanical systems may be drawn using the method of flow balance (kinematics) or force transmission, or a combination of the both. Since the basic external elements used are the same and only the energy conserving junction structure may vary, considering one factor of power automatically takes care of the effect of the other factor. This is perhaps the greatest contribution of the bondgraph theory.

Art of Creating Models

Representing systems in form of models is an art. Neat and good-looking models are arrived at following certain established practices and reduction methods. However, ultimately the model author deserves the credit for putting pieces

open in browser PRO version

Are you a developer? Try out the HTML to PDF API

pdfcrowd.com

together to create good visual effect. Some reduction schemes, which may be used to compress or uncompress bond graphs, are presented here. This work out in the reverse in helping to understand the bond graphs drawn by others. In this section the philosophy of model building and reduction is presented. Most of the matter presented here are extracts from "Lecture notes on sytem modeling" by Prof. A. Mukherjee and Prof. R.Karmakar of the Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur. Model reduction steps

A junction with only two bonds attached to it may be replaced by a single bond provided this does not lead to attaching any two external elements (I, C, R, SE, SF, GY or TF) to each other without a junction. These reductions are summarized in the table below. In this table J stands for any junction (1 or 0 ) and E for an external element. Reader may verify these reductions by simply writing the junction laws for such junction. Two neighboring identical junctions may be merged, the internal bond between two such junction is dropped in this process (see section E and F in table). Any 1 -junction to which a source of flow is attached which has constant zero value and no external element is attached may be removed from the bond graph with all bonds attached to it (see section G in table). Any 0 -junction to which a source of effort with constant zero value is attached and no external element is attached may be removed from the bond graph with all bonds attached to it (see section H in table).
Junction Structure R e duce d Form

open in browser PRO version

Are you a developer? Try out the HTML to PDF API

pdfcrowd.com

open in browser PRO version

Are you a developer? Try out the HTML to PDF API

pdfcrowd.com

The reductions (3) and (4) must be done after the bond graph is already reduced due to (1) and (2). In a sense there is a hierarchy in the reduction open in browser PRO version Are you a developer? Try out the HTML to PDF API

pdfcrowd.com

reduced due to (1) and (2). In a sense there is a hierarchy in the reduction process. Some more elementary equivalent forms shown in the table below. These equivalent forms may be established by writing junction laws and accounting for the fact that a source of flow (SF) can meet any demand of effort by the system and a source of effort (SE) can meet any demand of flow. Thus the following rules hold. A zero source of flow may be removed from a 0 junction. A zero source of effort may be removed from an 1 junction. 1-junction is a distributor of SF. 0 junction is a distributor of SE.
Junction Structure R e duce d Form

open in browser PRO version

Are you a developer? Try out the HTML to PDF API

pdfcrowd.com

Two more reductions widely used in bond graph modeling are shown below.
Junction Structure R e duce d Form

open in browser PRO version

Are you a developer? Try out the HTML to PDF API

pdfcrowd.com

Bondgraphs for mechanical systems To create a bond graph for a mechanical system it is advisable that a good schematic sketch of the system or a word bond graph be made. A good word bond graph is a great aid when one deals with systems in multi energy domain. The following three methods are most often used effectively to create bond graphs for mechanical systems : Method of Flow Map Method of Effort Map Method of Mixed Map - Method of flow map The method of flow map is based on the fact that the single port mechanical C or R element may be attached to a 1-junction where the relative velocity of ends of these elements are available. Single port I elements may be attached to 1open in browser PRO version Are you a developer? Try out the HTML to PDF API

pdfcrowd.com

these elements are available. Single port I elements may be attached to 1junctions, where absolute velocities of generalized inertias are available. Following steps may be followed to create system bond graph by Method of Flow Map. Create 1-junctions depicting the components of velocities of inertial points. Create 1-junctions depicting the motions of end points of C and R elements. Relate and connect these junctions by transformer (TF)elements if a lever relations exist between them. Gyroscopic relations and feedbacks may be incorporated using gyrator (GY ) elements. Create the relative velocities between the end points of C and R elements. 0-junction may be used for adding or subtracting the velocities. Attach C and R elements to 1-junctions where relative velocities of their end points are created. Reduce the bond graph using reduction process discussed earlier. Often it may be of great advantage if superscripts or subscripts are shown at 1 junctions depicting the points of the system and components of motion. However, these superscripts or subscripts are purely for book-keeping and are ignored during subsequent processing. Example 1 : Let us consider a system shown in the figure below. Two 1junctions are created depicting velocities at mass-point and ground excitation. Difference of these two velocities are taken using a 0-junction and relative velocity is established at the 1-junction shown as 1m v. The velocity depicted at 1 m v is d(xm )/dt - d(xv)/dt. Next, one attaches the external elements. An alternative bond graph may be created by making two 1m v junctions and then attaching C to one and R to the other. This bond graph may then be reduced to the earlier one.

open in browser PRO version

Are you a developer? Try out the HTML to PDF API

pdfcrowd.com

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

Creating bond graph of a spring-mass-damper system.

open in browser PRO version

Are you a developer? Try out the HTML to PDF API

pdfcrowd.com

(e )

(f)

A lternative bond graph for the spring-mass-damper system.

In case V(t)=0, i.e., the end of the spring is attached to the inertial frame of observation, the final bond graph forms given above (in figs (d) and (f)) may be reduced to a very simple form. This reduction is shown below.

(a)

(b)

open in browser PRO version

Are you a developer? Try out the HTML to PDF API

pdfcrowd.com

(c)

(d)

(e )

Bond graph of a spring-mass-damper system anchored to the ground.

(a)

(b)

(c)

A lternative bond graph for the ground anchored spring-mass-damper system.

Example 2 : An idealized car model with rigid body and flexible suspensions with excitations from the road is shown in the figure below. It's bond graph is created by Method of Flow Map as shown below the schematic diagram of the system.

open in browser PRO version

Are you a developer? Try out the HTML to PDF API

pdfcrowd.com

Two dimensional model of a car

open in browser PRO version

Are you a developer? Try out the HTML to PDF API

pdfcrowd.com

(a)

open in browser PRO version

Are you a developer? Try out the HTML to PDF API

pdfcrowd.com

(b) (a) bond graph model of the car, (b) reduced bond graph

- Method of effort map When a generalized force applied on an inertial point is such that the positive values of the force accelerates the inertial point in a positive sense, then the power directions on the bonds attached to the 1-junction will be as shown in the figure below. To its right, the case of a force is shown which when positive produces acceleration in the negative coordinate direction of motion.

open in browser PRO version

Are you a developer? Try out the HTML to PDF API

pdfcrowd.com

The method of effort map may be completed by the following steps. If necessary create a 0-junction for sources of effort. Such junctions may be treated as distributors of efforts. Decide whether the tensile force in C is to be taken as positive or it is the compressive force which is to be taken positive. In linear springs such a choice may be arbitrary. For R elements, decide what kind of relative velocity (compressive or stretching) is to be taken as positive. In linear systems this choice may be arbitrary. Addition of forces may be done using 1-junction. Linear forces may be converted to couples using transformer (TF) elements. Similarly, angular velocities may be converted to gyroscopic forces using gyrator (GY ) elements. Reduce the bond graph using the rules discussed earlier. Example 3 : The system of shown below in figure (a) is modeled in steps as shown in figures (b) and (c).

open in browser PRO version

Are you a developer? Try out the HTML to PDF API

pdfcrowd.com

(a)

(b)

(c)

In this bond graph tensile force in the spring and tractile force on the damper is taken as positive. C and R elements are directly put on 0-junctions depicting the forces in them. An alternative bond graph is drawn for this system in the figure below. In this bond graph the forces due to the spring and damper are added and then distributed using a 0-junction. The graph is then reduced to a form shown to the right.

open in browser PRO version

Are you a developer? Try out the HTML to PDF API

pdfcrowd.com

Example 4 : The car model discussed in the method of flow map is drawn using Method of effort map in the figure below. Here the compressive forces in suspension are taken to be positive. An alternative bond graph is shown in the next figure and is then reduced to a simpler form.

open in browser PRO version

Are you a developer? Try out the HTML to PDF API

pdfcrowd.com

(a) Model for vertical dynamics of a car

open in browser PRO version

Are you a developer? Try out the HTML to PDF API

pdfcrowd.com

(b) A lternative model for vertical dynamics of a car

open in browser PRO version

Are you a developer? Try out the HTML to PDF API

pdfcrowd.com

(c) Reduced model

- Method of mixed map The 1-junctions on which the forces accelerating generalized inertial points are added correspond to velocities of these inertial point in Method of Effort Map. Now if a part of a system is modeled by Method of Effort Map, then the 1junctions depicting these velocities may be used to create the bond graph for the rest of the system following Method of Flow Map. The following example illustrates this process. Example 5 :For the system shown below, the bond graph of the car is completed by Method of Effort Map. The idealized passenger placed on this car represented as mass spring system as shown in the figure is then modeled by Method of Flow Map.

open in browser PRO version

Are you a developer? Try out the HTML to PDF API

pdfcrowd.com

(a) Schematic diagram of car with a passenger

open in browser PRO version

Are you a developer? Try out the HTML to PDF API

pdfcrowd.com

(b) Bond graph of car with a passenger

Bond graphs of electrical circuits Following three methods are found suitable while drawing bond graphs for electrical circuits. They can also be extended to other circuit-morphic systems in the field of hydraulics and electronics. Method of Gradual Uncover, Point Potential Method, Mixed Network Method.

open in browser PRO version

Are you a developer? Try out the HTML to PDF API

pdfcrowd.com

- Method of gradual uncover In this method one may cover (conceptually) comparatively complex parts of circuit and then treat them as macro impedances. Make the bond graph putting such impedances at proper places. Then uncover them and put the details on the bond graph. However one may have sub-covers covering complex parts of macro impedances which may then be gradually uncovered. The following example illustrates this process. Example 6 : An electrical circuit is shown in the figure below and to its right a covering scheme is shown. Then in 5 steps (c to g in figure) the bond graph is created by gradual uncovering.

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

open in browser PRO version

Are you a developer? Try out the HTML to PDF API

pdfcrowd.com

(e )

(f)

(g)

- Point Potential Method Method of Gradual Uncover fails in many cases. In bridge circuits, for example, a satisfactory scheme of creating covers becomes impossible. The alternative Point

open in browser PRO version

Are you a developer? Try out the HTML to PDF API

pdfcrowd.com

Potential method is guaranteed to work in every case. Following are the steps of Point Potential Method. Each point of circuit where ends of various elements or sub-circuits are tagged may be made into a 0-junction. Any element or impedance through which current flows may be attached to a 1-junction between the 0-junctions. A suitable tag point may be grounded. This is achieved by attaching a zero source of effort to a 0-junction. Unless grounded, the circuit remains floating. Each individual circuit must be separately grounded, for example circuits on primary and secondary sides of a electrical transformer are treated as two separate circuits and must be grounded on both sides. Reduce the bond graph. The following example illustrates this approach. Example 7 : Let a bridge circuit shown in the figure below be considered. Point Potential Method produces the bond graph shown to the right. The reduced bond graph and rearranged graph are shown next.

(a)

(b)

open in browser PRO version

Are you a developer? Try out the HTML to PDF API

pdfcrowd.com

(c)

(d)

- Mixed Network method The method of point potential and gradual uncover may be often mixed to a great advantage. The complex impedances may be covered in the first go. Once the overall structure is produced by Point Potential Method, the uncovering may be taken up. The ultimate bond graph may then be reduced. The following

open in browser PRO version

Are you a developer? Try out the HTML to PDF API

pdfcrowd.com

example illustrates this method. Example 8 : Bond graph for the bridge circuit shown earlier is developed this way. The figure given below shows the scheme of covering. The bond graph is then developed in stages (b) to (d) shown in the figure.

(a)

(b)

open in browser PRO version

Are you a developer? Try out the HTML to PDF API

pdfcrowd.com

(c)

(d)

Hydraulic circuits are drawn more or less in the same manner as electrical circuits. Before concluding, here are two important warnings to the reader. Odd power loops should be avoided: If there is a loop of junctions then two important points should be observed. There should be even number of bonds forming the loop. Bonds power directed clockwise or counter clockwise must be even in number. Causal loops should be avoided. In a junction loop, not all junctions should have their causalities determined by internal bonds (i.e. bonds which are part of the loop).

Proceed to the previous topic page Proceed to the next topic page

2013 HighTe ch C onsultants. Be st vie we d in IE 6.0 and above with 1024 x 768 re solution. Vie w disclaim e r policy.

open in browser PRO version

Are you a developer? Try out the HTML to PDF API

pdfcrowd.com