0% found this document useful (0 votes)
44 views

(II) Integrals of The Form

The document summarizes methods for evaluating integrals of certain types, including integrals with singularities and Fourier integrals. It defines the Cauchy principal value of integrals that do not exist, and presents theorems using residues and Jordan's lemma to evaluate principal values of integrals over singular functions. An example evaluates an integral of cosine over a singular point using these methods.

Uploaded by

yashbanw
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
44 views

(II) Integrals of The Form

The document summarizes methods for evaluating integrals of certain types, including integrals with singularities and Fourier integrals. It defines the Cauchy principal value of integrals that do not exist, and presents theorems using residues and Jordan's lemma to evaluate principal values of integrals over singular functions. An example evaluates an integral of cosine over a singular point using these methods.

Uploaded by

yashbanw
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 13

12

Lecture 14

(II) Integrals of the form ( ) f x dx

}
.
The integral ( ) f x dx

}
is defined as
( ) lim ( ) lim ( )
c b
a b
a c
f x dx f x dx f x dx



= +
} } }
.

If the limit on RHS does not exist, or gives an indeterminate
form , ( ) f x dx

}
does not exist. In this case, we define
Cauchy Principle Value of ( ) f x dx

}
as
. . ( ) lim ( )
r
r
r
p v f x dx f x dx


=
} }
.
Example. For f(x) = x, the integral ( ) f x dx

}
does not exist but

2 2
. . lim lim( ) 0
2 2
r
r r
r
r r
p v x dx x dx



= = =
} }
.
Note that if ( ) f x dx

}
exists, ( ) . . ( ) f x dx p v f x dx


=
} }
.
13

Using the method of residues, the Principle Value of above type
of real integrals can be found. We need the following
Proposition for this purpose:

Proposition. Let
(i) f(z) be analytic in Im z > 0, except for having finitely many
singularities in Im z > 0
(ii)
0 0
1
( ) , , , , 0.
M
f z for z R for some M R
z
o
o
+
< > >
Then, lim ( ) 0, : , Im 0
R
R
R
C
f w dw where C w R w

= = >
}
.
Remarks.

(i) The conditions of the proposition are satisfied if

(a) f(z) is analytic in some neighbourhood of z = (i.e. outside
of some disk centered at origin) and, at z = , f(z) has a zero of
order 2 > .

For, in this case, Laurents expansion of f(z) in the
neighbourhood of z = , is of the form


3 2
0
2 3 2
( )
( ) ... , ( )
d d z
f z where z M for z R
z z z

= + + < >

the conditions of the proposition
0
2
( )
M
f z for z R
z
< > is
satisfied if f(z) has a zero of order 2 > at z = .
14

(b)
( )
( )
( )
P z
f z
Q z
= , ( ), ( ) P z Q z polynomials, and
degree of denominator degree of numerator 2 > .

In this case, ( ) f z has a zero of order 2 > at z = , so that by (i),
the conditions of the proposition are satisfied


Proof of the Proposition. For
0
R R > ,

1
( ) ( ) . 0
R R
C C
M M
f w dw f w dw R as R
R R
o o
t
t
+
s < =
} }
.









15

Theorem. Let

(i) f(z) be analytic in Im 0 z > except for having finitely many
singular points , 1,2,..., Im 0
k
z k N in z = >
(ii)
0 0
1
( ) , , , 0
M
f z for z R for some R M
z
o
o
+
< > >
Then, . . ( ) p v f x dx

}
exists and

| |
1
. . ( ) 2 ( )
k
n
z z
k
p v f x dx i res f z t

=
=

=

}
.

Proof. Let
0
1,...,
k
z R for k N < = . For
0
R R > , let


{ } { }
: : , 0 : ,Im 0
R
z x iy R x R y z z R z I = + s s = = >

By Cauchy Residue Theorem,

| |
1
( ) ( ) ( ) 2 ( )
k
R R
R
N
z z
k
R C
f z dz f x dx f z dz i res f z t
=
=
I
= + =

} } }

where,
R
C is the counterclockwise oriented semicircle
{ }
: ,Im 0 z z R z = > .
Using the proposition, it follows that the limit of second
integral on LHS is 0 as R .

| |
1
. . ( ) 2 ( )
k
N
z z
k
p v f x dx i res f z t

=
=

=

}

16

Example. Evaluate
4
1
1
dx
x

+
}

Solution. Since the above integral exists,
4 4
1 1
. .
1 1
dx p v dx
x x


=
+ +
} }
. Let
f(z) =
4
1
1 z +
. It has singular points at
2
1/4
4
( 1) , 0,1,2,3.
ik i
k
z e k
t t +
= = = Therefore,

/4 3 /4 5 /4 3 /4 7 /4
4
0 1 2 3
, , ,
i
i i i i i
z e z e z e e z e e
t
t t t t t

= = = = = = .
Only
0 1
z and z lie in Im 0 z > and the conditions of the previous
theorem are satisfied.
/4 3 /4
/4 3 /4
4 4
3 3
1 1
2
1 1
1 1
2
4 4
i i
i i
z e z e
e e
I i res res
z z
i
z z
t t
t t
t
t
= =
(
= +
(
+ +
(
| | | |
= +
| |
(
\ . \ .



/4 2 /4
3 /4 9 /4
2 1 1
.
4 2
i i i
i i
i i
e e e
e e
t t t
t t
t t
(
(
= + = +
(

/4 /4
2
2 sin
2 4 4
2
i i
i i
e e i
t t
t t t t
| |
(
= + = =
|

\ .
.
Note. If f(x) is an even function, then
0
( ) f x dx

}
can also be
evaluated by this method.
17

(III) Integrals of the form ( )
i x
e f x dx
o

}
, 0 o >
(Fourier Integrals)

We need the following result:

Jordans Lemma: Let,

(i) ( ) f z be analytic in Im 0 z > except for having finitely
many singular poits

(ii)
{ }
( ) 0 : 0 arg f z uniformly as z in z z t < < .

Then, for 0 o > , lim ( ) 0
R
i w
R
C
e f w dw
o

=
}
, where
R
C is the
semicircle , Im 0 z R z = > .

Proof. We use the Jordans inequality


2 sin
1, 0 / 2 for
u
u t
t u
s s s s

(Proof of Jordans inequality: we first show that if f(t) is + as
t|, then
0
1
( ) ( )
t
F t f x dx
t
=
}
0 t > , is also decreasing with t|.
Obviously, ( ) ( ) F t f t for all t > . Therefore,
18

2
0
1 ( ) ( ) ( )
( ) ( ) 0
t
f t F t f t
F t f x dx
t t t
t
'
= + = + <
}
( ) F t as t + |.

Applying this result to cos 0 / 2 in u u t s s (since cosu is + in
this interval), it follows that

0
1 sin
cos 0
2
x dx is in
u
u t
u
u u
= + s s
}
2 sin
1
u
t u
s s )

Now, by hypothesis,

( ) ( ) , ( ) 0
R
f z R on C where R as R < .
sin
0 0
/2
sin
( ( ) ( ))
0
( )
2
R
i w i w R
R R
C
R
R
using f f
e f w dw R e d R e d
R e d
t t
o o o
t
o
t

=
< =
=
} } }
}

2
/2
.
( ' )
0
( ) 2
(1 ) 0
R
R
i w
R
using Jordan s inequality
C
R
R
e f w dw R e d
e as R

t
o
o
t
o

t

o

s
=
} }
.

19

Theorem. Let f(z) be analytic in Im 0 z > except for having
finitely many singularities in Im 0 z > . Let f(z) satisfy the
conditions of Jordans Lemma. Then, the integral
. . ( ) , 0,
i x
p v e f x dx
o
o

>
}
exists and is given by

1
. . ( ) 2 ( )
k
n
i x i z
z z
k
p v e f x dx i res e f z
o o
t

=
=

(
=

}

where
k
z are the singularities of f(z) in the upper half plane.

Proof. Let
0
R be such that
0 k
z R < for all k = 1,2,, N. By
Cauchy Residue Theorem,

1
( ) ( ) 2 ( )
k
R
R
n
i x i w i z
z z
k
R C
e f x dx e f w dw i res e f z
o o o
t
=
=

(
+ =

} }
.
Taking limit R and using Jordans Lemma, the Theorem
follows.

20

Example 1. Evaluate
2 2
cos
; 0, 0
x
I dx a
x a
o
o

= > >
+
}
.
Solution.
1
2 2
Re Re ( )
i x
e
I dx I say
x a
o

= =
+
}
.
The function
2 2
1
( ) 0 f z as z
z a
=
+
in the upper half
plane and it has a pole of order 1at z ia = in the upper half
plane.

1
2 2
1
2 ( ) 2
2 .
2
i z i z
z ia z ia
a
a
I i res e f z i res e
z a
e
i e
ia a
o o
o
o
t t
t
t
= =

(
(
= =
(
+
= =

1
Re
a
I I e
a
o
t

= = .
21

Example 2. Evaluate
( )
2 2
; 0, 0
( )
i x
e
I dx a
x a x ia
o
o

= > >
+
}
.
Solution. The function
( )
2 2
1
( ) 0
( )
f z as z
z a z ia
=
+
in
the upper half plane and it has a pole of order 2at z ia = in the
upper half plane.

( )
2 2
2 2 ( )
( )
i z i z
z ia
z ia
e d e
I i res i
dz z ia
z a z ia
o o
t t
=
=
(

( = =
`
+
+
(
)



( ) ( )
2 2
2 2
2 2 2
( ) 2 1 1 2
4
2
i z i z
a a
z ia
i e z ia e a a
e e
a
z ia ia
o o
o

=
( (
+ +
= = =
( (
+
( (

.

(Note that the point z = ia is in the lower half plane, so residue
at this point need not be computed for the evaluation of the
integral)
22

Remarks.

(i) If f(x) is even,

0
1 1
( )cos ( )cos Re ( )
2 2
i x
f x x dx f x x dx f x e dx
o
o o


= =
} } }


1 1
1
Re 2 ( ) Im ( )
2
k k
N N
i z i z
z z z z
k k
i res f z e res f z e
o o
t t
= =
= =
(
( (
= =
(



.

(ii) If f(x) is odd,

0
1 1
( )sin ( )sin Im ( )
2 2
i x
f x x dx f x x dx f x e dx
o
o o


= =
} } }


1 1
1
Im 2 ( ) Re ( )
2
k k
N N
i z i z
z z z z
k k
i res f z e res f z e
o o
t t
= =
= =
(
( (
= =
(



.
23

(IV) Fourier Integrals having Singularities at Real Axis

We illustrate this case by considering the evaluation of the
integral
0
sin
, 0
x
I dx
x
o
o

= =
}
.
Note that
1 sin
2
x
I dx
x
o

=
}
1
Im
2
i x
e
dx
x
o

=
}
.

Let contour of integration be as shown in the figure and

| | | |
,
, , ,
R R
R C R C where R


+
I = >

Then, by Cauchy Theorem,
,
0
R
i z
e
dz
z

o
I
=
}



[ , ] [ , ]
0
R
i x i x i w i w
R R C
C
e e e e
dx dx dw dw
x x w w

o o o o

+ + + =
} } } }
. (*)

The last integral tends to 0 as R (by Jordans Lemma).



-R

R
C


R
C
24

Further,
0
(cos sin )
( )
i
i w
i i
putting w e
C
e
dw i e d
w

o
o

+
=
=
} }
.

Since the integrand is continuous function of in the interval
[0, ] t , the above identity gives

0
lim
i w
C
e
dw i d i
w

t
t

= =
} }
.

Therefore, by (*),
0
sin
. .
2
i x
e x
p v dx i dx
x x
o
o t
t

= =
} }
.

You might also like