0% found this document useful (0 votes)
680 views6 pages

BRE 365 Infiltration Calculation

This document provides calculations for a soak-away test and design of a soak-away system for Hemmings Worlebury School. Key details include: - A soak-away test was conducted on April 6th measuring water level changes over time. The calculated infiltration rate was 0.0126 m/s. - Based on the low infiltration rate, a design was proposed using ring soak-aways filled with gravel, with additional land drains connecting multiple soak-aways. - Trenches would be dug and filled with stone to a depth of 1m to connect the soak-aways. The total storage capacity of 44.4 cubic meters was calculated to accommodate runoff from a

Uploaded by

Raburgess1
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as XLS, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
680 views6 pages

BRE 365 Infiltration Calculation

This document provides calculations for a soak-away test and design of a soak-away system for Hemmings Worlebury School. Key details include: - A soak-away test was conducted on April 6th measuring water level changes over time. The calculated infiltration rate was 0.0126 m/s. - Based on the low infiltration rate, a design was proposed using ring soak-aways filled with gravel, with additional land drains connecting multiple soak-aways. - Trenches would be dug and filled with stone to a depth of 1m to connect the soak-aways. The total storage capacity of 44.4 cubic meters was calculated to accommodate runoff from a

Uploaded by

Raburgess1
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as XLS, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 6

Client Project

Hemmings Worlebury School


Calculation No Calculation Title Status
8682-D01 Soak-away test results Construction
Notes
Revision Date Notes Author Checked Approved
A !26!2010 "irst #ssue A$H SH %&"
Job No. 8682 BRE !" soaka#$ test calculations
Site Worlebury School
Date o% soak&a#a$ test 6!'th A(ril
'eather Dry
'idth ()* +en,th ()* Depth ()*
Pit di)ensions 0)* 2)1 2)8
Ti)e Duration (-rs*
16+00 0 0
16+,, 0)-- ,-0
1'+06 1)10 '00
1'+,* 1)6- 10-0
18+12 2)20 100
18+- 2)'- 1'-0
1*+18 ,),0 2100
Soil #n.iltration rate . /
0olume
#nternal sur.ace area o. the trial (it u( to -01 e..ecti2e 3e(th an3 inclu3ing the base area
the time .or the water le2el to .all .rom '-1 to 2-1 e..ecti2e 3e(th
De(th 4 2-1 De(th 4 -01 De(th 4 '-1 Di..erence in 3e(th
5otal 3e(th o. water 2)2'- 1)'- 1)22- 1)0-
De(th to Water sur.ace 0)-2- 1)0- 1)-'-
1)*8-
12),*
#nter(olate3 .rom gra(h
2)6
0)8-
1)'- hrs
% . 0)0*1-
2)-26-0- m ! s
Depth to 'ater
Sur%ace ())*
0
('--2-
/
a
(-0
/
t
('--2-
/
/
p0"&1"
.
/
p0"&1"
.
m
,
a
p"2
. a
p"2
.
m
2
t
p0"&1"
.
t
(2-
t
('-
t
p0"&1"
.
m ! hr
f =
V
p7525
a
p50
t
p 7525
0 0)- 1 1)- 2 2)- , ,)-
0
-00
1000
1-00
2000
2-00
3n%iltration test
Ti)e (-ours*
D
e
p
t
h

t
o

#
a
t
e
r

s
u
r
%
a
c
e
Job No. 8682 Soak&a#a$ solution desi,n
% . 0)0*1-
2)-26-0- m ! s
Consi3ering the use o. %CC ring soak-aways with a33itional granular .ill
Diameter 1)8
6..ecti2e Wi3th ,)6
0oi3 ration o. granular / 0),
72erall 0oi3 ratio 0),8
8ength o. lan3 3rain / 20)16
Design storm / 10 year
Si3e area 9ase area
%it 1 : 2 ;1)8m Dia)< 1) 10)
%it , ;2)1m Dia)< 16)8 1)2
5rench 1 ;1m 3e(th stone< 1')6 0
5rench 2 ;1m 3e(th stone< 22)68 0
412.5
7ut.low .rom the soak-away ,)0'6-0,
3n%lo# to the soak&a#a$
Draine3 area / 610
Desi,n Rain%all (accordin, to BRE !"*
"rom "ig 1 =atio r / 0 $--60 min / 20 mm
As low soak-away results gi2e a low in.iltration rate> we shall assume the longest storm ;2 Hr<
?1 / 2)2 ;.rom table 1<
?2 / 1)2 ;@rowth .actor .rom table 2<
m ! hr
Assume 2 such soak-aways with lan3 3rains connecting them
to a thir3 with 3iam) 2)1m an3 e..ecti2e wi3th / )2m .or
a33itional in.iltration)
Area being 3raine3 / 610m
2
5he trenches shall be (er.orate3 (i(es connecting the soak-aways with an e..ecti2e 3e(th o. stone
1m) As this corres(on3s to 1!2 the 3e(th o. the (it soakaways being consi3ere3> the .ull si3e 3e(th
;but not the base< has been consi3ere3) #n a33ition> the base o. the stone .ille3 element o. the soak-
aways has been consi3ere3 as these areas are (rotecte3 .rom silting u( by use o. geoteAtiles)
m
2
m
2
m
2
m
2
m
2
m
2
m
2
m
2
Total (a
s"2
* .
)
1
m
,
!s
m
2
6
.
.
e
c
t
i
2
e

w
i
3
t
h


Diameter
Job No. 8682 Soak&a#a$ solution desi,n
=;total rain.all< / -6 mm
There%ore total in%lo# to soaka#a$ over 16 hours . ,,>88' 8itres
.75
5he balance o. .lows is there.ore+
Total 8ut%lo# in 16 hours 1!".!
5here.ore reBuire3 storage / - 2,1)'
Consi3er the 2olume a2ailable within the soak-aways
5otal Area @ran3 total
%it 1 : 2 2)- ,)12 -)6' 22)68
%it , ,)6 )2- ')'2 1-),
Total Stora,e . 7.44
Storage 7kay
Check -al% Drain ti)e9
"ollowing the en3 o. the storm> the time reBuire3 .or hal. the remaining
&42.60 -rs
1!2 Drain time 7kay)
)

m
,
=ing m
2
@ranular .ill m
2
m
,
m
,
)

You might also like