100% found this document useful (2 votes)
515 views366 pages

British School at Rome

Estudos sobre o Império Romano.

Uploaded by

marcos.firmino
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
100% found this document useful (2 votes)
515 views366 pages

British School at Rome

Estudos sobre o Império Romano.

Uploaded by

marcos.firmino
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 366

PAPERS

OF THE

BRITISH SCHOOL AT

Volume

1906

ROME

PAPERS
OF THE

BRITISH SCHOOL AT

ROME

Vol. Ill

PRINTED FOR THE SUBSCRIBERS AND SOLD ON THEIR BEHALF BY

MACMILLAN &

CO., Limited

LONDON
1906

Reprinted with the permission of the Original Publishers

JOHNSON REPRINT CORPORATION


New York

1971

London

In the interest of uniformity,

Those

illustrations

been reproduced

which appeared

in black

and white

First reprinting 1971,

10-23.

in color in the original

have

in this reprint.

Johnson Reprint Corporation

Johnson Reprint Corporation


Ill Fifth Avenue

New York, N.Y.

we have reduced volumes

10003, U.S.A.

Johnson Reprint Company

Ltd.

Berkeley Square House

London,

Printed in the U.S.A.

mit miiiii uauhRi'

W1X5LB,

England

PREFACE.
The

publication

Rome may

School

at

activity

and usefulness.

The

of

third

fairly

be taken

evidence

as

of

British

continued

its

paper contains a further instalment of the valuable work

first

which the Assistant-Director, Mr. Ashby,

is

Campagna Romana.

lost

history of the

Mr.

Ashby has won

himself

for

and

doing

for the recovery of the

In this department of study

accurate observer.

scrupulously

explorer,

be added

proof of the estimation in which Mr.

reputation

well -deserved

indefatigable
in

by the

volume of 'Papers'

Ashby

is

an

as

may

It

held

by

foreign scholars, and also of the friendly relations existing between the

and the other foreign schools

British School

have

papers

shorter

been

published

in

by the

Rome,

that

some of

French School

his

in

their

are both of

them

Melanges.

The papers by Mr.

Stuart Jones and

Mr.

Wace

valuable contributions to the study of a subject which has only recently


received

its

historical

due share of attention, the growth and development of

Of

sculpture.

arguments

in

especial

importance

are

Mr.

Roman

Stuart-Jones's

favour of assigning the Borghese reliefs to the time of

Trajan, and Mr. Wace's claim to have discovered in the Lateran and

Vatican

which

Roman

Museums fragments
help

to

historical

fill

gap

reliefs.

of reliefs belonging to the time of Domitian,


in

our knowledge of

the

development of

Preface

vi

Mr. G. F. Hill deals with one


drawings,

nature

in

this

among

the

many

instances in

which

case dating from the 15th century, throw light on the

and history of the

original

antiques

from

which

they were

taken.

of

Miss McDowall's

paper

discusses

and

argues

that

iconography

problem

in

the

on a contorniate, now

have a portrait of Pythagoras taken from a

lost fourth

difficult
in

field

Paris,

we

or fifth century

statue.

H. F. Pelham.

CONTENTS.
Preface.
r.

By Prof. H.

T. AsHBY, J UN.

The

Pelham

F.

2.

H. Stuart Jones.

3.

A.

J.

B.

Wage.

Notes on

II.

Roman

Fragments of

...

Roman

G. F. Hill.

Some

5.

K. A.

McDowALL.

Pythagoras

.213

Historical Reliefs in the Vati-

Museums

Drawings from

Pisanello

PAGE

Roman Cam-

Historical Sculptures

can and Lateran

4.

Topography of the

Classical

pagna.

....

the

Antique attributed

-273
to

295

35

LIST OF PLATES.
I.

The

Classical Topography of the

Roman Campagna, Part IL

PLATE

View

S.

from Castel Giubileo

Via Salaria

Villa

Spada

in the distance

Twenty-fourth mile, looking W.S.W.

at

known

Villa Platform

as Grotte di Torri,

W.N.W.

angle

Ponte del Uiavolo, Via Salaria

Tomb known

as Sedia del Diavolo,

General view of

sixth

terrace

Via Nomentana

wall

on Colle

Tiutillo,

Palombara
Cistern on sixth terrace, Colle Tiutillo,

Palombara

Detail of sixth terrace wall on Colle Tiutillo, Palombara

Via Tiburtina at Bagni

Aqueduct

Palombara

......

Detail of third terrace wall, Colle Tiutillo,

at the travertine quarries

Ponte Lucano, Via Tiburtina

near Bagni

....
.

Relief built into a chapel near Corcolle

Viaduct over Fosso di Ponte Terra

Ponte deir Acquoria

Wall of lower platform. Villa of Quintilius Varus

Nymphaeum

Antonio

at S.

.....

Ancient road on S.W. slopes of Monte Sterparo

Supporting wall of ancient road on S.W. slopes of Monte


Sterparo

Supporting wall of

villa

platform at Colle Nocelle

Tank in platform of villa at Colle Vitriano


Lower platform of villa on Colle Vitriano
Lower platform of villa on Colle del Tesoro

Cyclopean

wall

under wall

Turrita
.

Caves on Colle Cighano

of mediaeval

castle.

Coll


List of Plates.
PAGE

XII, Fig. 26. Drain

XIV,

XV,

in wall of villa platform, Colle Cigliano

Fig. 27.

Lowest platform

Fig. 28.

Uppermost platform

Fig. 29.

Walls under castle

....
....

Monteverde

at

Monteverde

at

Montecelio

at

Fig- 30- Villa platform at Vallemara, near S.

XVI,

Supporting wall of

Fig. 31.

villa

Fig.

Terrace wall of

2,2,.

villa

Angelo

platform N. of

Fig. Z2. Villa platform at 26th kilometre "of

XVII,

173

S.

Angelo

modern highroad

below Villa dei Greci

183

187
189
190-

Fig. 34-

Upper

terrace wall of villa near Regresso

191

XVIII,

Fig. 35.

Lower

terrace wall of villa near Regresso

igi

Fig. 36.

Supporting wall of road

XIX,

Fig. 37.

Bridge

Two Maps
.

(I,

at

Quarto Pomata

50,000

II,

....

19.S.

25,000) in pocket at end of volume.

Notes on Roman Historical Sculptures

XX,

194

Fig.

I.

Reliefs in the Villa Borghese.

Fig.

2.

The Arch

of Constantine, from a drawing in the possession of

the Royal Scottish

XXI, Medallions from Arch

Academy.

of Constantine.

South

face.

Imperial Cortege.

I.

Sacrifice to Silvanus.

II.

Bear-hunt.

III.

IV. Sacrifice to Artemis.

XXII, Medallions from Arch of Constantine.

North

face.

V. Boar-hunt.

VI. Sacrifice to Apollo.


VII. Lion- hunt.

VIII. Sacrifice to Hercules.

XXIII,

I.

II.

Submission of Germans to M. Aurelius (Palazzo dei Conservatori*.

Germans before

'

!-

XXV,

tribunal of

M. Aurelius (Arch of Constantine)

Entry of M. Aurelius into Rome, a.d. 174 (Arch of Constantine).

V. Sarmatian

captives before

tribunal

of

M. Aurelius (Arch of

Constantine).

XXVI,

VI. Triumph of M. Aurelius, a.d. 176 (Palazzo dei Conservatori).


VII. Sacrifice to Jupiter Capitolinus (Palazzo dei Conservatori).

Illustrations in the Text.

PLATE

XXVII,

VIII. Lustratio

exercitits

(Arch of Constantine).

IX. Allocutio (Arch of Constantine).

XXVIII,

X. Allocutio in castris praetoriis, a.d. 174 (Arch of Constantine).

XI. Congiariui/i, a.d. 176 (Arch of Constantine).

XXIX,

I.

Coin of Domitian,

a.d. 85 (p. 261).

2.

Coin of Domitian,

a.d. 95 (p. 261).

3.

Coin of Domitian,

a.d.

4.

Coin of Claudius

5.

Coin of Trajan,

6.

Coin of M. AureUus,

(p.

90-1 (pp. 261, 293).

223).

a.d. 117 (p. 247,


a.d.

Fragments of Roman Historical Reliefs

3.

Museums

XXX,
4.

3).

the Lateran and Vatican

in

Figs. 1-5.

Fragments

in the Lateran

Museum.

Some Drawings from the Antique, attributed to Pisanello

XXXI,

Fig.

I.

Drawing of the Statue of the Tiber (BerHn Museum).

Fig.

2.

Drawing of the Boar-hunt (BerHn Museum).

XXXII, Drawing
:;.

note

174 (pp. 259, 261).

of

Three Figures (Louvre).

Pythagoras.

ILLUSTRATIONS IN THE TEXT.


Paper

Fig.

I.

Fig.

2.

Rehef

Fig.

3.

Relief in Villa Medici

Fig.

4.

Relief in Uffizi

^\-

Fie

6.

>

Paper

226

Trajanic Rehef in Louvre


in Villa

Medici

Temple of Magna Mater


Temple of Mars Ultor

238

....

Sacrifice on

"

239

Palatine

241

Medallions III. and IV. from Arch of Constantine

2150
^

Vatican.

Fig.

I.

Relief.

Fig.

2.

Fragment.

Part of

Lateran.

Triumph

Lictors

283
289


Illustrations in the Text.

Xll

Paper

Fig.

1.

Fig.

2.

Fig.

3.

Head
Head

Drawing.
,,

of Severina.

Louvre

of Hadrian.

Louvre

....

Capitol

Statue of Tiber.

Fig. 4.

Orestes, from Sarcophagus at Husillos

Fig.

Adonis Sarcophagus

Paper

5.

at

298

299
301

302

Mantua (Codex Pighianus

303

Fig.

I.

Contorniate Medallion.

Fig.

2.

Bust.

Capitoline

Pythagoras

310

Museum

-111

NOTE.
Plates

Plate

Paper

XXI XXVni are from photographs


XXXI is from photographs by Braun.
2,

Fig.

is

from

by Anderson.

photograph by Giraudon

Fig. 4

is

from a photograph by

Brogi.

ADDENDUM.
P.

221. Mr.

Jacques,

Wace
f.

provenance

finds that the fragment from the Piazza Sciarra

29,
is

is

given.

also

drawn

in

Cod. Vat. 3439,

f.

65.

drawn by Pierre

No

indication of

PAPERS OF THE BRITISH SCHOOL AT ROME.


Vol.

III.

No.

i.

THE CLASSICAL TOPOGRAPHY


OF THE

ROMAN CAMPAGNA
Part

II

BY
T.

ASHBY,

Junior, D.Litt., F.S.A.

Assistant-Director of the British School at Rome ; formerly


University of Oxford

Corresponding

Member of

the

German Imperial

LONDON:

1905.

Craven Felloiv in the

Archaeological Institute.

INTRODUCTION
The. present

is

the second instalment of a description of the Classical

Roman Campagna, which

Topography of the

The

course of time.

scale

upon which

it is

hope

complete

to

the

in

written demands, perhaps,

some

explanation and for English readers some apology. I can understand


that, for those who are not well acquainted with the localities of which I

am

treating,

may

which

it

may seem

that there

a quite unnecessary fulness of detail,

is

But

tend to obscure the points at issue.

my

ambition

so far

is,

as possible, to produce a description which shall be complete up to date


(more I cannot claim) and which I shall then supplement as occasion arises

as indeed

am now

doing

Labicana, which appeared


fluous
to one

and even wearisome

who wishes

for Part

in

i,^

Papers,

i.

the Viae Collatina,Praenestina, and

What may seem supermay be of more use

125 sqq.

to the reader at a distance

to follow the description on the spot

confess to a not unnatural desire to claim credit for


as I know
With regard

fill.-

to the citations

of the mass of existing

literature

work on the Campagna


885

sqq.)

is,

that

from previous writers,

as a reviewer of the

must

also

have seen

it

too, the perusal

first

section of

\n the Berliner Philologische VVochenschrift

remarked, a somewhat weary business

obliged to carry
for

and

well that there are sure to be plenty of gaps for others

inasmuch
to

all

through, with,

and, as

my

{igo-i,,

have been

hope, a certain degree of completeness,

the purposes of the present work,

it

may

not be amiss

if

give

results in a fairly full form, so as to save other students the trouble of

much unnecessary

my

doing

same as I have done. It may be added


caused to students by the custom of publishing practically (though not absolutely) identical reports of excavations in Rome and its neighbourhood in
that

the

labour

is

In the

Addenda

literature of the subject,

time for

it,

bare references to the


I confine myself to the more important points
whether too recent to be included in the original work, or not collected in
;

are not as a rule given.

have not aimed at an exhaustive or complete description of the immediate suburbs of Rome
the great necropolis on the W. of the Via Salaria, for instance (infra, ii), would require a
volume to itself.
^

B 2

The

both the Notisiedcgli

British School at Rome.

Scavi^.\'\^i

advantage of cross-references
be

many

omissions

though

the Bullettiiio Conuoialc without, as a rule, the

{infra, 41, n. 2).


I

have aimed

need not say that there must

at completeness,

cannot, in the nature of the subject, be attained {Papers,

know

137).

i.

that
I

it

have

again limited myself to the consideration of the classical topography of the

With regard

roads.

dealt with the

first

appeared originally
but

my

in the

references are

The Via

1892.

mediaeval period, Professor Tomassetti has

to the

two roads, and

shall frequently refer to his work.

Archivio della Societd Roniaiia di Storia Patria,

made

which appeared separately

to the reprint

in

Tiburtina, on the other hand, he has not yet reached:

while his description of the Viae Praenestina and Labicana


of publication in Archivio
z'\s I

It

now

is

in

course

and has not yet appeared separately.

cit.

have already observed, the completion of several other important

works now

in

course of publication will lighten the labours of the student

considerably.

refer

among

others to Vols.

Inscriptionuiii Latinarutn, neither of

which

vi.

and xv. of the Corpus

at present possesses indices, to

Professor Lanciani's Storia degli Scavi, to Professor Wissowa's re-issue of


Pauly's ReaUncyclopddic.

provenances

which

to

It is

be regretted that there

Kaibel's Inscriptiones Graecae Italiae

in

this

is

unfortunately to be observed in several other works

is

several of the catalogues of the chief

such indices renders


ness

no index of

is

it

difficult to

The

of sculpture.

in

lack of

attempt anything approaching complete-

record of discoveries in the

one's

in

museums

an omission

notably

constructing a general index for one's

own

Roman Campagna,

use

a task which

without

have not yet

attempted.

The
the Via
student.

three roads which

have selected

for

examination, the Via Salaria,

Nomentana, and the Via Tiburtina, are of unequal interest to the


The Via Salaria is, in its first portion at least, one of the oldest of

Roman roads, for Antemnae and Fidenae were almost the earliest conquests
of Rome in Latium and the fact that it and the Via Latina are the
;

exceptions to the rule that a road should take


place which

it

serves or from

its

indicate that a considerable part of


antiquity.^

Its

name

is

said

its

constructor (Papers^

by our

its

course

is

name
i.

either from the

29)

would seem to

of comparatively

classical authorities to

high

be derived from

^
The passage of Livy (vii. 9. 6) in which he says that the Gauls in 361 B.C. 'ad tertium
lapidem Salaria via trans pontem Anienis castra habuere proves the antiquity of the road and the
Vjridge, the latter playing an important part in the episode of Manlius Torquatus.
As to the
'

questions connected with the battle of the Allia, see infra, 23 sqq.

Roman Campagna. II.

Classical Topography of the


the fact that

it

was the route by which the Sabines came to fetch

the marshe's of Ostia and Fregenae (Festus,

326

p.

from

salt

autem

Salaria

Miill.

(via) propterea appellabatur, quod impetratum fuerit, ut ea Hceret a mari


Paul, ex Fest. p. 327 Miill. Salaria via Romae
in Sabinos salem portari
Pliny, H.N. xxxi.
est appellata, quia per earn Sabini sal a mari deferebant
:

89, honoribus etiam militiaeque interponitur

auctoritate,sicut adparet

apud antiquos
salem

Sabinos

in

ex nomine Salariae
In

convenerat).

portari

viae,

times

later

it

thoroughfare of considerable importance, communicating as

Reate and the Adriatic


curatores,
1

89 1, 121

all
;

men

We

coast.

quoniam ilia
became a

Pauly-Wissowa, Realencycl.

remains of antiquity along the part of

its

five

of

its

distinction {Bull. Com.

some

But

1782).

iv.

did with

it

have the inscriptions of

of senatorial rank and of

magna

indedictis

(sal), salariis

presents very few

it

course which

within the

falls

The Via Nomentana must also be of early


limits of the present work.^
origin, having had originally the name of Via Ficulensis (Livy, iii.
52. 3; C.I.L. xiv. p. 447): it was subsequently prolonged to Nomentum,
but never became a road of

Via

some

Salaria

objects

of interest

miles

first

class

further

importance,"^

on.^

The Via

itself,

probably

not

Romans

in

later

League
the

times,'^

individuality, but retained

in

its

summer.

not

and though

it

road

portion

first

former appellation, the

7]

Ovakepla

h'

dp-x^erai fxev

dvo Ti^ovpcop,

into

during

the

became an important
of

it

never

lost

its

name Via Valeria being

applied only to the portion of the road beyond Tibur (Strabo

238

only to

must have come

It

constructed

regularly

as

establishment of the Latin

thoroughfare

more

but to a territory which rivalled the Alban Hills

as a resort of the wealthy


existence

the

Tiburtina, on the

other hand, led to a very populous and important district


the city of Tibur

in

however,

possesses,

It

the Via Salaria.

than

and merged

dyec

8'

iirl

v.

3.

11,

p.

Ma'pcroL'? kuI

Kop(f)LvLov TTjv TOiv JiacXLyvcov /xi^TpoTToXiv).^

This fact
^

will partly

explain the disproportionate amount of space that

Persichetti's Viaggio Archeologico sulla Via Salaria iiel Circondario di Citladiuale takes

up

the course of the road from Rieti onwards.


^

Both the curatores of

whom we

have inscriptions are

men

of equestrian rank {Bull. Com.

1891, 129).
*

The

We

question as to the exact point of junction

have inscriptions of eight of

its

is

curatores, all

a difficult one {infra, 27

men

sqc].).

of senatorial rank {Bull.

Coin.

1891,

124) and distinguished career.


''

It is

{C.I.L.

ix.

an open question whether the road ran beyond Cerfennia before the time of Claudius
Besnier, De Begione Paelignonim, 108 n. 2).
5973
;

6
I

British School at RoiME.

TiiF,

may seem

have been

to

have devoted to

work

at

Another reason

it.

TivoH and

in

that archaeologists

is

territory ever since the 15th century,

its

more extensive than


WithTivoli
in the case of any other town in the neighbourhood of Rome.
that would form a sufficient subject for a
itself I do not propose to deal
But
separate monograph, and I have no new material to add.
have
literature of the subject

and the

considerable

is

far

thought

well to give a

it

full

description of the country round

it,

up to the

gates of the town, in order, as far as possible, to cover the tracts of country

between the great

lines of

road which form the main subject of these

papers.

The maps which

serve to illustrate the text have been prepared

Italian Istituto Geografico Militare.

them

on a smaller scale than the second

is

military authorities do not

map on
city,

so

now permit

25,000

scale.

them properly upon a smaller map


any claim

is

due to the

districts

which are given

the

it

it

did not seem worth while

of Tivoli, on the other hand,

would have been impossible

The

it is,

positions are

am

to

show

not sure that

shown

as nearly as

mathematical exactitude, inasmuch as

to

they have not been determined by survey, but only by eye.


in

of

first

fact that the

made from

reproductions to be

and, even as

have always avoided indistinctness.


possible, but without

this

The neighbourhood

of remains of antiquity that

full

by the

the immediate neighbourhood of the

in

some of the outlying

for

adopt the larger

to
is

the scale of

and that

be noticed that the

It will

the text, are sketch plans from

The

my own

plans, too,

measurements,

though they have been worked up by a competent draughtsman, Signer

Odoardo

my

and to Miss Dora E. Bulwer

As
and

my

own, but

27, 28,

under my own supervision. The photographs are mostly


acknowledgments are due to Professor Lanciani for Figs.

Ferretti,

before,

my

father,

must express

with which

forgive

me

my

tribute to the
161 sqq?),

names are omitted, and believe that it is from no inpart.


But no English writer on Tivoli can omit to pay a

memory

who,

knowledge

of the late Mr. F. A. Searle, of S. Antonio [infra,

in the course of a

familiar with the


his

their

if

gratitude on

sincere thanks to Professor Lanciani

whom
have examined almost the whole of the
am dealing. Others who have helped me will perhaps

with

district

for Figs. 15, 22, 24, 25, 26, 33.

my

long residence there, had

topography of the

district,

at the disposal of his friends.

never return to Tivoli without a sense of loss

made himself

and was ever ready

Those who knew him


;

and

I,

to place

well can

who am among

them,.

Classical Topography of the


feel that

do otherwise than dedicate these pages

hardly

can

Roman Campagna. II,

to his

memory.

VIA SALARIA.
I._From the Porta Collina to Castel Giubileo
the First to the Sixth mile).

{from

The Via

Salaria, even in

Republican times, undoubtedly started from

the Porta Collina of the Servian wall, where


the right (Strabo

%a\apia oSof
'HprjTOv

Tr}<i

dpxo/u.evr}

v.

p.

el<;

Kal

fjv

r;

the Via

Festus

p.

326

Miill.

rj

^M/xevrapr] avfiTrurret Kara


rrj';

avTi]<; ttuXi;?

Salariam viam incipere

The

a porta, quae nunc Collina a colle Quirinali dicitur).

discovered in

Nomentana on

avrwv (tmv "Za^ivwv)

virep rov Tt/3epe&>? Kei/nevT] drro

Kco/ntji'

KoWcv7]q

it left

228, earpwrat Be St

ovaa,^

ov iroXkr]

%a^un]<;

Tr]<i

i,

3.

1872 under the N.W. angle of the

gate

itself

Finance Ministry

ait

was

(Bu//.

Com. 1876, 165) and an important inscription relating to the Via Caecilia,
a branch of the Via Salaria, was found in the same place {Not. Scav. 1896,
87

Rd7n. Mitt. 1898, 193

The

C.I.L.

vi.

31603).

itineraries give the distances as follows {C.I.L. ix. p. 204)

AntonianuiH, pp. 306

seq.

Peutingeranuni

Ravennas

XVHI

34

Fidenis

Fidenis

ab urbe

4,

XIIII
Eretiim

Ereto

Ereto

xnn

XIIIII

Farfa
I

XVI

XVI

Reate

Reate

Mommsen

{ibid.

Nobis

ad Novas

Vico novo

582) reconstructs as follows

ab urbe Fidenas m. p. V
Fidenas Eretum m. p. XIIII ab urbe m. p. XIX
Ereto ad Novas s. Vicum Novum m. p. XIIII ab urbe m.

The

expression

is

somewhat strange and

its

p.

XXXIII.

meaning hard

to see.

The

On
(ubi

mansio

a Reate)

however, he speaks of the

464,

p.

in

as existing

ad

Mariae

S.

Nuova, which

della Ouercia, which

is

on the

is

map

xvi

he speaks of

Ponte del Diavolo.

by Kiepert

my map

(No.

i.)

must further be noted that the

(It

his

in

fifteen miles

m.

p.

from Reate

than two miles from

less

Madonna

again about a mile and a half from the 29th mile

from Rome, shown on the edge of

from the Osteria Nerola

Rome and

provinces of

p.

But a measurement along

dclla Qnercia'

marked by Kiepert gives only about

the road as

given

{C.l.L. ix. 5943, 5944)

prope PonticelH (a meridie mansionis Vicinovi

'

xvii vel xviii a Reate)

to Osteria

xxxii a Roma, m.

p.

commenting on the two milestones numbered xxxi of

Augustus and of Juh'an the Apostate

them

Osteria nuova de' Massacci

'

ad Novas sive Vicus novus m.

fuit

and

'

British School at Roime.

Carta dell

Italia

'

little

beyond the

line of the

Centrale

(passing

road as

N.N.E.

along the line of the boundary of the

first

communal boundary

Perugia, and then along a

Olmo) though

enough

have

past the Osteria

dell'

not explored

can hardly be taken to be the Via Salaria, inasmuch as by

following

it

it)

it is

likely

to be ancient (I

the road would miss both the Ponte del Diavolo and the mile-

stones at the

Madonna della Quercia, while the distance would be still


The measurements in my map, however, can only be

further reduced.)

approximate, as the course of the road

probably been made

that the milestones at the


original position

it

is,

Persichetti

Madonna

and they have very

uncertain,

In any case, assuming

della Quercia are not far from their

whether they are in situ or no, we are not told the

crepancy of half a mile


again

is

in rather too straight a line.^

may

fairly

claim excuse.

on the map, a short two miles


rightly, as

it

miliarium xxxv' of C.l.L.

to the

Osteria

dis-

Nuova

Ponte Buido, which

with the

seems, identifies
vi.

From
'

pons

in

fluvio

ad

31603, at which the Via Caecilia diverged

from the Via Salaria {Rom. Mitt. 1898,

197).

These considerations have an important bearing on the question of


the site of Eretum, which is somewhat uncertain. Fidenae was undoubtedly
5

miles from

Eretum

would

Peutingerana

Dionysius

Rome
14.

(xi. 3)

{infra, 18)

13

lie

and according

miles

The former
that

it

further

agrees

on,

to the

Antonine Itinerary

according

better

with

lay 140 stadia (17I miles) from

to

the

Tabula

the statement

of

Rome, and near

^
It will be seen that the catacombs of S. Anthimus are, according to them, about 2z\ miles
from Rome, whereas our ancient authorities vary, some indicating them as 22, others as 28 miles
from Rome {infra, 31).

Roman Campagna. II.

Classical Topography of the


the Tiber

but the latter seems to suit the position of the

ad milHarium xxxv

'

inasmuch as

'

ad milHarium xxxv

'

'

pons

in fluvio

covers, according

The views

to Latin usage, the whole extent up to the 36th milestone.

of

topographers on the subject are various {infra, 27 sqq^.

As

to the initial portion of the road, a difficult point

is

raised

by the

catalogues of Christian cemeteries, which take us back to the fourth century.

we find the Via Salaria Vetus distinguished from the Via Salaria
The Nova is undoubtedly the straight road from the Porta

In these

(Nova).^

Collina to the Porta Salaria of the Aurelian wall, and so on along the line

followed by the

De

modern road

but as to the Vetus there

Rossi {Bull.' Crist. 1894, 6 sgg) makes

Porta Collina, identifying


wall (which blocked

towers to the

W.

its

it

it

is

more

diverge from the

question.-

Nova

at the

with a road which passes under the Aurelian

course completely) between the second and third

of the Porta Salaria, and thence ran up to the Bivio del

Leoncino, at the E. angle of the

villa

Borghese.^

He

then makes

it

follow

the Via dei Parioli, sending off a branch from the bivio to join the Salaria

The

Nova.
along

its

three cemeteries which the catalogues* mention as existing

course are, that of Pamphilus, that of S.

Hermes, or of

Basilla,

and a third called ad Septem Palumbas,' 'ad caput S. lohannis,' or 'ad


Clivum Cucumeris,' the first and second of which have been discovered
(Marucchi, Guidadelle Catacombe Romane {\go^ ^20 sqq?), the former at the
'

point of divergence of the Vicolo

now belonging

to the

The

side of the road.

descent

(in

German

di S.

Filippo, the latter in a vineyard

College, rather further along, on the S.W.

third has not yet been found, but

which traces of the ancient paving

may

must be upon the

be seen^) to the N.W.

of the cemetery of S. Hermes.

The word Nova

Salaria

is

but the addition

not actually used in the catalogues,


is

which speak of

it

simply as Via

convenient as serving to distinguish the two roads, and

is

generally

made.
" By an unfortunate error for which
Nova has not been included in my map

am

though the smallness of

responsible the district to the


its

scale

W.

of the Salaria

would hardly have

admitted of the necessary clearness in indicating the topographical details of this district.
^ Its pavement was found in 1891 at 3 metres below the modern level, just outside the Aurelian
wall, and 3 metres further down was found another pavement of gravel, pointing to its being a road
of considerable antiquity
"*

(j5////.

Com. 1891, 290; Not. Scav. 1891, 132).


is given by .Stevenson {Bull. Crist. 1897, 255), but

recently discovered catalogue

it

does

not add to our knowledge of this district.


delle Tre Madonne, the Vicolo dell' Arco Oscuro (both of which diverge S.S.W.
and the cross road connecting them N.E. of the Villa di Papa Giulio are all,
probably, of ancient origin, as are, indeed, all the lanes in this district {Bull. Com. 1891, 144).
^

from

The Vicolo

this road)


The

lo

If,

Parioli,

British School at Rome.

however, we follow this descent we arrive at the foot of the Monti


not far from the Ponte Molle

we must,

Salaria Vetus for this road,

name

the

course

the

we accept

if

we wish

if

N. of Antemnae

and

VV.

we know
It

which

is

the cemetery of S.

crossing of the

with the line of the road

di

certainly an ancient road, represents the line of the

Hermes nor

it

might be objected that neither

the Clivus Cucumeris

and we have no evidence that

it

pursued a winding
the

it.

primitive Via Salaria, though in that case

line

it

the

might be possible, on the other hand, to assume that the Vicolo

Filippo,

S.

namejof Via
press the meaning of

reach

to

Anio, or else abandon any attempt to connect


as

to

whole road,^ either suppose that

for the

to

and

lies

actually

upon

its

ever descended to the bridge over

it

the Anio. Tomassetti, Vie Nonientana e Salaria, 6 seems to favour this view.

way (Fonna Urdis, 2,9, 16), making


Capo le Case, the Porta Pinciana being
the Aurelian wall, and join the road regarded by

Lanciani solves the difficulty

in

another

the Salaria Vetus begin in the Via


as an aperture

left

De

for

in

it

Rossi and others (cf Gatti, Nof. Scav. 1899, 51) as the Salaria Vetus

but which he marks as

Collinam

Nova a

'

{Forma

little

'

Diverticulum a Via Salaria Vetere ad Portam

Urbis, 3)

further on

at

In that case one would have to

by the Porta

wall
The

the Bivio del Leoncino, and the Salaria

before the crossing of the new

Ratumena

assume that

it

Viale dei Parioli.^

originally left the Servian

or Fontinalis at the

N.E. angle of the

discovery of pavement in situ in the Via dei Parioli, and of a fragment of a sepulchral inscrip-

Com. 1892, 292. I copied there, at the beginning of the descent, a tufa
W. edge of the road, bearing the following inscription in letters of the
century of the Republic.
The letters are 8 cm. high.

tion, is described in Buli.

cippus
last

still iti

situ

on the

S.

VS IK

N-

FRO>

PEXX-IN

RO PXX
In the Vicolo di S. Filippo a cippus of the
31565^)1 This

is,

probably, hardly necessary.

Aqua Virgo may

Aringhi,

still

be seen in situ (C.I.L.

Roma Subterranea,

ii.

vi.

94, quotes an instrument


'
Salaria vetus quae

of Charlemagne, preserved in the Archives of S. Peter's, which speaks of the


dividitur

of

it

ad pontem Molui.'

i.
i. 354
Lanciani, Ruins and Excavations, 75.
became known as Via Pinciana in the early middle ages, and William of Malmesbury say
'cum pervenit ad Salariam nomen perdit' (Urlichs, Cod. Urb. Rom. Top. 87).

'^

Jordan, Topogr.
It

Classical Topography of the

Roman Campagna. II.

Capitoline hill, diverging from the Via Flaminia not far from the gate, or
more probably by the Porta Salutaris or Quirinalis (a little below the Quattro
Fontane). This would add another mile to its course (rather more in the
first

which would perhaps

case, rather less in the second)

better {supra, 8) but the supposition

reasons

and

it

open

is

is

suit the Itineraries

somewhat improbable

other

for

to the objection which applies to the Vicolo di S.

Filippo, but in an even stronger form, as such a line passes to the E. even

of the Cemetery of

Pamphilus.

Fabretti {De Aquis, Diss,

Tab.

iii.

ii)

places the divergence of the two roads at the Porta Salaria, and Lanciani

{Forma

Urbis,

3)

does mark a

Diverticulum a Via Salaria Vetere ad

'

Portam Salariam,' following Bufalini (155

The

1).

made between the Porta Collina and


the Porta Salaria do not concern us here.
The Porta Salaria is, as it stands,
entirely modern, having been rebuilt after the bombardment of September
20th, 1870.
The removal of the towers of the gate of Honorius ^ led to
discoveries which have been

the discovery of

several

Jordan," Topogr.

3.

tombs (Lanciani, Ruins atid Excavations, 75


Immediately outside the gate, to the W. of
;

i.

437).

the road, begins one of the most extensive cemeteries that have

The majority

light in the outskirts of the city.

come

to

of the tombs belong, as

{lac. cit.) to the lower orders, and many of them


Thousands of tombs have been found in the last two

Professor Hiilsen remarks


are

columbaria.

centuries,

and

it

appears that the troops stationed

were buried here.

Several

columbaria belonging

the

to

Republican and the beginning of the Imperial period, and


state of preservation,

were found

new Carmelite monastery.

by three narrow

in

1896-1900 on the

They were arranged

roads, parallel to the

Camp

in the Praetorian

site

in

end

of

the

a very fine

now occupied by

in four rows,

Via Salaria Vetus of

separated

De

Rossi

cit.).
The inscriptions are given in C.I.L. vi. p. 3439 sqq.
and Not. Scav. 1900, 499, 574 (cf. 634), 1901, 15, and earlier discoveries are
summarized by Hiilsen {loc. cit) and Homo, Essai sur le Regne de
r Enipereiir Aiirelien {Bibliotheque des Acoles Franqaises fasc. 89) p. 229, n. 6.

(Gatti, Not. Scav.

Other discoveries are

still

building operations (cf

occurring in this necropolis

Not.

Scav. passim

and

in

consequence of

especially

1904,

^ A view of the gate, which had two round towers and three windows above
the arch,
found in Nibby and Gell, Mitra di Roma, tav. viii.
-

This, the concluding vohime of the work,

allowed

me

to see the

work

in proof.

is

from the pen of Prof. Hiilsen,

who

436).

may be

has i^indly

The

12

The

British School at Rome.

inscription C.I.L.

10241, found in

vi.

name

outside the Porta Salaria, gives us the


'

D. M. M. Herenni

n.

iiii

cineraria n.

I'roti

the Vigna J^elura

fecerunt parentes

chirographum oUaria

intrantibus parte laeva que sunt in

iiii

in

1725,

of a landowner in this district.

monumento

T.

Flavi Apollodori quod est Via Salaria in agro Volusi Basilides ientibus ab

urbe parte

sinistra.'

Important mausolea are

rare,

though a striking exception

is

formed by

the fine round mausoleum of Lucilius Paetus in the Vigna Bertone {C.I.L.
vi. 32932).
It consists of a circular base, 34 metres in diameter, of blocks
of travertine, which encloses a mass of earth upon which a conical mound

The

was probably placed.


into a Christian

chamber was perhaps transformed

sepulchral

burying place

late

in

the

century (Marucchi,

fourth

Here and elsewhere the tombs of the second and


third centuries A.D. lie at a much higher level, and Professor Lanciani
conjectures {Pagan and Christian Rome, 284) that the earth which Trajan
excavated for the construction of his Forum was dumped here,
A cippus of the pomerium as enlarged by Claudius was found (whether
in situ or not we do not know) in the Vigna Naro in 1738, at about 300
metres from the Porta Salaria {C.I.L. vi. 31537c); and a cippus of the
octroi line of Marcus Aurelius was copied in Via Salaria' by the AnonyCatacojnbe, 388 n.

i).

'

mus

If Lanciani's conjecture,

Einsiedlensis.

followed the octroi

gate {Bull.

Com.

line, is correct, it

1892,

94

Homo,

op.

cit.

Nomentana

On

233).

road there seem to have been hardly any tombs,


the Via

of Aurelian

that the wall

must originally have stood

close to the

E. of

the

Fontana) forming the boundary of

(the Vicolo della

the Villa Albani, which very likely follows an ancient line (Lanciani,
Urbis, 3

after Bufalini).

Its

course

fallen into the

Via Nomentana at the

probable that

it

went straight on,

Vicolo degli Alberoni,

in

the

road goes off to join

is

uncertain for a while:

first

its

kilometre

line

but

it

it

Forma

may have

seems more

being taken up again by the

the boundary walls of which there are several

paving stones, and which seems to follow an old line and that it then went
on through the valley and joined the cross road known as the Vicolo di S.
;

Agnese

{infra, 13).

Of

the Via dei Parioli and the Vicolo di S. Filippo

we

have already spoken {supra, 9, 10). Remains of Roman


and Lanciani {Bull. Com. 1891, 147) cautions his readers

that

many

architectural fragments to

are

not of local

provenance.

be seen in

the

vineyards

villas are

scanty,

of the

Roman Campagna. II.

Classical Topography of the

The Via

Lanciani, Storia dcgli Scavi,

Mirabilibus (ed. 15 15)


Salaria prope porta

170, cites

i.

He

from Albertini, Opuscuhun de

tomb 'extra urbem

cum

uitibus et uasibus hydriaru depictae uisunt


ro.

mihi ondit apud uinea non l5ge a

considers that the reference

is

not to S. Costanza {infra,

but to a tomb belonging to the Via Salaria, of which

42)

He

other record.

also {pp.

we have no

220) mentions a permission given on Nov.

cit.

Catherine of Albano, to excavate in her

29, 1523, to

uia

in uineaad similitudinem templi constructum,in quo

quae omnia Petrus Paulus de Symeonib.


porta Salaria.'

villas.

the description of a

63'',

f.

Caereris et Bacchi picturae

Via

and then runs straight

Salaria turns several degrees further E.

on between the boundary walls of modern

13

own vineyard on

the

Salaria.

The

site

of the

first

milestone would

del Parioli,

and the second close

before the latter

little

to the

is

fall

beyond the new Viale

little

catacomb of

S. Priscilla.

reached, the Vicolo di S. Agnese, which

almost certainly represents the line of an ancient road, goes off E.S.E. to

Nomentana in a straight line, reaching it close to the church of S.


On the N.W. side of the Via Salaria at this point the tufa
blocks of the margo may be seen for some distance under the modern

the Via

Agnese.

boundary

wall.^

In this district, between the

Pont.

i.

197

n. 82),

two roads, according to Duchesne

was situated the Civitas Figlina cf the passion of S.


said to have been buried
iuxta
ii. 632) who is
:

Susanna {Acta SS. Aug.

'

corpora sanctorum Chrysanthi

sanctum Alexandrum,
and

o\k\QX?>

Salaria,

iussit

includerentur.'

Dariae Via Salaria,

et

in civitate Figlina,'-

{Acta SS. Ian.

quos

{Lib.

ii.

ut

216)

in

'

in

arenario iuxta

and that of SS. Marius, Martha

tenuit (imperator) cclx christianos

figlinis

Tomassetti, however,

muros

foras

{pp. cit.

portae

Salariae

Via
.

28) prefers to connect the

Civitas Figlina with Ficulea {infra, 61 sqq.) but wrongly.

The brickworks of

the Via Salaria were of considerable importance {C.I.L. xv. 478-529,^ 683),

those of the Via


site

is

Nomentana

less

extensive

not to be gathered from the stamps.

{ibid.

677-682) but their exact

The only

possible brick earth

1
Tomassetti, op. at. 25 n. i, erroneously refers some of the discoveries of tombs made immediately outside the Aurelian walls to this portion of the road.
- For S. Chrysanthus and S. Daria see Marucchi, op. cit. 404.
The S. Alexander mentioned

is

a son of S. Felicitas {ibid. 400).


^

Nos. 530-532 also belong to

\.\\ft

figlinae of the Via Salaria, but probably (not certainly) to

kilns situated further along the road, in the Sabine territory.

The

14

be found

to

is

cf

British School at Romp:.

Anio and Tiber

the valleys of the

in

{Bull.

Com. 1892, 92

n.

91 for the use of bricks from these brickworks in buildings in the

ibid.

neighbourhood of the Praetorian Camp).

The road soon

turns to run due N. and descends through a cutting,

which has been considerably enlarged

Near the beginning of the

Salario.

modern

in

cutting,

on the

times,

Ponte

the

to

the entrance to

left, is

the catacomb of S. Priscilla, which extends also under the road (as does
the

Coemeterium lordanorum',

'

than a mile further back).

less

described by Marucchi, Cataconibe Ronia?ie,^i6 sqq.

It

is

fully

Close by, in the Villa

Amici, a columbarium with paintings was found by D'Agincourt {C.I.L.


vi.

7997-8011).

century as the

Com.

Bull.

The
Monte

891, 323

above the catacomb was known

hill

delle Gioie

(De

in

Rossi, Bull. Crist. 1890, 97

Storia degli Scavi,

i6th

Lanciani,

Further down, on the right

73).

i.

the

of the descent, four tombs were discovered in 1879, the remains of two of

which are

visible (cf Not. Scav. 1883, 82),^ while the

still

road was recently uncovered

On

the

left

in clearing

paving of the old

out the modern ditch.

now crowned by a fort, once occupied by


Antemnae said to have been conquered by Romulus.name is explained as 'ante amnem i.e. Anienem' by

of the road

is

the

hill,

the primitive village of

The meaning
Varro, L.L.

inasmuch as

28,

v.

stands at the point where the Anio

it

Tiber, thus occupying a position of great

the

into

of the

connexion with the battle of the Porta Collina

{Sulla, 30)

mentions

82

such a manner as to indicate that

in

B.C.

Strabo mentions
fortified

8'

rjv

ri)^

iii.

68)

names

in

his

day.

vvv Se

real

which had

it

among

The

p.

The

Hulsen

The
it

was not

far

his time

from the

among

city.

the old

become mere villages,


aXka roiavra
dwo TpiaKovTa rj fiLKpw

doubt as

(v.

cities

3.

ISkotcov,
2,

p.

of Latium

given

by

our

230),

and

Pliny

{H.N'.

which had disappeared


ancient

authorities

are

the identification certain, and there has never


to
in

the

site

while

absolute

certainty

connexion with the construction of the

was
fort

Ruderi' marked in the map are not ancient.


in Pauly-Wissowa, H.E. i. 2350.

237)

the

indications

make

brought by the excavations


'

in

Kcofjbai, Krrjo-eL^

(nahicov^

'Vooixrj'^

sufficiently clear to

been any

it

with Collatia, Fidenae, and Labici, as

in

koI 'AvrifivaL Kal ^iSfjvai koX Aa^iKov koX

TToXi'X^i^ia,

/Jiv

TrXetovwv

in

Rome

towns near

KoWarca
Tore

it,

it

falls

Plutarch

strength.

inclusion of Labici

was

fifteen or

is

a piece of careless writing, for as Strabo himself well

more miles from Rome.

knew

(v. 3. 9,

Roman Campagna. II.

Classical Topography of the


in

1882-86 {Not. Scav. 1882, 415;

Lanciani, Ruins

and Excavations,

Some

were discovered.

1 1

16;

1883,

1886,

24;

1887,

15

64;

cf.

when the remains of the primitive city


waUing were found both on the N. and

1),

traces of

two points where the existence of gates is probable (Nibby, Analisi,


161, supposes that there were four gates in all, but Lanciani admits three
only), built in somewhat irregular opus quadratum of blocks of capellaccio
S.,

at

i.

(an inferior variety of tufa), not very carefully squared, 0-89 m. in length on

an average, and 0-59

and Excavations,

height {Ruins

in

Remains of

cit.).

the foundations of huts were also discovered, and a good deal of local
pottery, corresponding to that found in the earlier strata of the Esquiline
necropolis, with a considerable

Chalcidian ware

and

admixture of Etruscan bucchero and Graecowere even a few sporadic objects of the

there

stone age.
of the city was well cared for

The water supply


foot of the

the

within

hill

on the

the circuit of the

N.,

One

walls.

feet deep, while the cistern {Riiins

was of great

after its discovery,

The

besides the springs at

there were several wells and a

of the former

and Excavations,

fig.

cistern

no

less than 54
destroyed
soon
43),
is

interest.

N. portion of the site was later on occupied by a villa at the

end of the Republican or commencement of the Imperial period, considerable remains of which were found, among them a cistern divided into three
chambers.

Two

brick stamps of the

first

century A.D. {C.I.L. xv. 670b,

On the E. side some burials


864) were found loose near these ruins.
under tiles were discovered, dating perhaps from the time of the abandonment of the

villa

the coins found

with the bodies were

inscribed cippi were also found in use

may

in

be that the discoveries of 1822, of which Tomassetti speaks

are to be referred to this

gode verso tramontana

site
la

remains

Two

illegible.

the repairs of the villa itself

of a villa

'

{op. cit. 30),^

sulla collinetta

prospettiva del basso Aniene.'

It

da

cui

si

If so, the find-

spot of the sarcophagus with a relief of the Nereids must be on the E. of


the road.

Or,

{infra, 45), then

if

we

refer the villa to

the sarcophagus

a site E. of the Ponte

may have been

Salario

found near the Sedia

del Diavolo {ibid.).

The comparison which Professor Lanciani makes and develops between


Antemnae and the early city on the Palatine is interesting and important

which

He
is

also mentions excavations

unknown.

made

in the

tenuta of Ponte

Salario in

1821, the result of

The

i6

and

British School at Rome.

a pity that military exigencies rendered

it is

it

impossible to explore

the site thoroughly, and to preserve the remains which were discovered.

do not know even where the pottery that was found is kept..
The Ponte Salario by which the road crosses the Anio has been thrice
destroyed in comparatively recent times, and little of the ancient structure
the greater portion of the small arches on each side.

now remains except


It

was cut

degdts,

1867

Rome

fifteen

metres by the French

photograph of

it

after

it

{Edijisi, vi. tav. 178) gives views of

It

it.

les

was blown up

given in Lanciani's Destruction of Ancient Rome,

is

in their

{Rapport de la Commission Mixte pour constater

(Paris, 1850), 42).

etc.

Canina

1849 for a length of

in

on

attack

149,

p.

fig.

in

26.

had one central arch and

two smaller side arches of tufa with voussoirs of travertine. The parapets
which were thrown into the river in 1798, bore the inscription of Narses,
restored the bridge under Justinian in 565 A.D.^ {C.I.L.

who

Not

far

lOth

Cardinalis Tranensis

of tufa

the

Cohors Urbana, and holding a post called

praefecti urbis

quaestionibus

On

left

'

{C.I.L.

concrete (the

vi.

in

in

2880=32718).
beyond the bridge

little

in

The
the

'

the i6th century 'in praedio

facing of rectangular

mediaeval tower above.


but the loose blocks

was seen

'

of the road a

disappeared) with a chamber

From

1199).

from the bridge the funeral inscription of C. Sallustius Martialis,

of the

a soldier

vi.

is

blocks,

a large square

having,

tomb
usual,

as

the form of a Greek cross within, and a

map marks a tomb on


this point may belong to

the right also

Staff

field at

modern high road

the Ponte Salario the

the old bridge.

follows the valley of

the Tiber'^ as far as the railway station of Passo Correse, keeping at the foot
Nibby,

destroyed

all

op. oil. ii. 594, cites Procopius, Bell. Goth. iii. 24, fin., as
but the passage runs ToiriAas Se koX
the bridges over the Anio
;

TTiv TrpoaeSpeiav els


oiroos

fj.rj

'P(i)fj.a7ot

Sia(t>6e'ipai ovSafirj

as

if

that

Narses

fidp^apoi Kvaavrfs

Ti^ovpiv iroXiv a^'iKovro irdaas ax^^ov ti ras rov TiBfptSos y(t)vpas 8te\6vTes,

evneTus

a<pl(Tiv iwievai oiol

taxvaav, ewfl dyxicra

Procopius had here, as in

(15 miles)

staling
oI

iii.

rough measurement

ttjs

ye<pvpav /xevrot

S>ffi.

woAecos eru-yx""*" oZffa.

/liav,

^ Mi\$lov

It certainly

iiroivvfxSs

fart,

looks, however,

10 (where he says that Tibur lay on the Tiber about 120 stadia

from

Rome,

so that Totila's occupation of

it

prevented the

Romans from liringing provisions down by river from Tuscany !), confused the Anio with the Tiber.
The Pons Milvius is of course the bridge by which the Via Plaminia crosses the Tiber, and there
was no bridge across the Tiber above it until the Via Flaminia recrossed
Besides,
bridge below it, except those actually within the city of Rome.
bridges over the Anio which it was important to destroy.

it
it

near Otricoli, nor any

would have been the

Bartoli (A/ew. 135, in Fea, Misc. i. 260) notices that, during winter flood in the time of
Innocent XI, one of the banks of the river fell in, and a large marble sarcophagus was found by
some boatmen, who broke it to pieces, thinking that treasure was concealed in it. He does not

give the exact locality of the discovery.


2

Guattani's view (Mon. Sahitii,

i.

40,

cf.

147

n.

the book

which he there

cites is

unknown

Roman Campagna. II.

Classical Topography of the


of the

No

hills

which flank

traces of

it

on the

pavement have, so

and hardly ever changing

E.,

far as

17

in

level.

know, been discovered except

in

a hole made below Villa

1889, when a few paving stones were found in


Spada for a telegraph pole along the railway {Not. Scav. 1889, no). The
ancient road, therefore, kept more under the hills than the modern, as the
remains of tombs indicate {infra, 20), but the level was much the same.

Westphal {Romische Kampagne, 127, 128) remarks that there are no traces
of the old road along the modern one except, in places, up to the i6th
paving stones of limestone

mile, large

This

comparatively scanty.

and remains of ancient buildings are

has considerably complicated the

fact

difficult

problem as to the exact point at which the ancient Via Salaria

left

the

river valley {infra, 27).

On
remains

some

the right of the road, close to the Torre Boschetto, are

opus reticulatum, belonging probably to a

in

The Torre Ser-

villa.

pentara does not seem to rest upon ancient foundations

no

traces, at least,

are at present to be seen, the brickwork of the lower part of the tower being

mediaeval

and there are no other remains to be seen


Lanciani {Bull. Com.

Fidenae.

cinerary urn and of a roof

tile

328)

1891,

records

until

we

arrive at

the discovery of a

with the stamp C.I.L. xv. 864 between the

Torre Serpentara and the fountain of the farmhouse

of

S.

Villa

the

Spada.

The

Roman

site

territory

Cluver {Italia

and often

antiqjia,

N.E. of Casale
while Nibby

some while the

of Fidenae, which was for

di

656

in the
1.

hands of

2) placed

it

can be

Veii,^

little

frontier of the

fairly closely fixed.

beyond Castel Giubileo,

Sette Bagni, and Kircher {Latimn, 219) followed him,

(^/. cit.

ii.

51), Gell

{Topography of Rome and

its Vicinity,

248),

48) place the arx at Castel

and Dennis {Cities and Cemeteries of Etruria,


Giubileo, and the city on the height to the E. on the further side of the
Via Salaria. It is unlikely that the town should have been cut in two by
i.

the high road, so that Holste {ad


the site at Villa

Spada and
;

his

Cliiv. loc. cit.)

is

probably right

fixing

in

view has been followed by the majority of

modern topographers, though Nissen {Ital. Landeskunde, ii. 605) prefers


It must be confessed, however, that though proof is not
Nibby's view.
to

me, and the reference cannot be

taken to the

hills

referring to the divergence after


1

For

its

to a

directly after the

main road, but

bridge,

Malpasso {infra,

history in early times

cf.

to a

incorrect.

is

mere lane)

may have

that the road

Holste {ad Cluv.

p.

709,

24).

C.I.L. xiv.

p.

453.

1.

22)

is


The

i8

British School at Rome.

lacking that the

Roman

Spada

remains of an earlier period, and,

to the S.,

village stood

by the road,

walls or artificfal defences, are conspicuous

nature of the ground

such that one

is

by

just

below the Villa

in particular, traces

their

absence

of

while the

good as another.

site is really as

Excavations might very likely solve the problem, but nothing of the kind
has so far been undertaken
the low tufa

while the existence of undoubted tombs cut in

N. of the Villa Spada, on the E. edge of the railway,

cliffs

tombs which belong probably


exactly determine the

site

to

pre-Roman

does not suffice to

times,

We have, however, no
We know from

of the earliest settlement.

reason to suppose that there has been any material change.

the Tabula Peutingerana that in imperial times Fidenae lay on the

and Dionysius

Salaria,
(5

miles)

and

tells

though

(ii.

53,

iii.

Eutropius

(i.

us (as does Livy,

iv.

27, x. 22) gives the distance at


4,

19) puts

34. 6) that

it

at

it

Via

40 stadia

Rome
And various

6 miles from

lay near the Tiber.

discoveries have confirmed the identification with the Villa Spada, which, as
will

be seen from the map,

The

site is well

on every side by
E.N.E.

of

is

just over five miles from the Porta Collina.

enough adapted

the

fairly

deep

valleys,

except

which

Spada,

Villa

for a

narrow stretch to the

villa^

It

has been occupied

of the imperial period of which an open water reservoir

Roman

most conspicuous portion remaining,^ and not by the


lay rather at the foot of the

desolation are probably to


35. 96) speaks of

it

hill

close to the high road.

some extent exaggerated

as almost deserted, classing

Strabo {supra, 14) mentions

it

II. 8)

ranking

and Juvenal
with

it

(vi.

Gabii,

prosperity under the

57, x.

which,

Empire

100) scorn

The accounts of its

i.

leg.

agr.

Antemnae

an

as

Horace

The brickstamp 931b,

old

{Epist.

188).

certain

We

hear,

amount of
too, of

collapse of a temporary amphitheatre at Fidenae in a.d. 27, in which


^

ii.

as the type of desolation,

it

however, enjoyed

(cf Papers,

the

with Labici and Collatia

with Collatia and

it

is

which

village,

Cicero {de

town, the site of which had then passed into private hands
i.

S.W. portion

occupies the

itself

of the plateau, and must have served as the acropolis.

by a

being isolated

for a primitive settlement,

of the period of Hadrian, copied at Villa

Spada

in

1741,

may

the

many
belong-

to this building.
2

little

to the E. of this reservoir a

round shaft 68 cm.

in

ing probably to a subterranean cistern) has recently been found

now much

altered,

may have

served for

diameter with footholes (descend-

and some caves further E., though


the same purpose, as a round shaft communicating with
;

them from above seems to be of Roman origin (Gori, Dal Ponte Salario a Fidene Crustiimerio ed
^re/^ reprinted from Giorn. Arcad. clxxiv. (1863) 9). It maybe noted that the contention of
this author, that the Via Salaria came up to the Villa Spada itself, is quite unwarranted {supra, 17).

Classical Topography of the


thousand persons perished

Roman Campagna. II.

Suetonius {Tib.

40) puts the

number

19

of killed

iv. 63) the total number of casualties at 50,000.


Most of the spectators must, it is "true, have come from Rome: and the
structure was probably erected on the flat ground by the river for

at 20,000, Tacitus {Ann.

convenience.

The

place must have possessed, however, a certain importance as a

was found the actual curia ^ of the


village, a hall facing W., the back wall of which was formed by the rock
while the W. wall had an arch
itself, cut perpendicularly and cemented
post station.^

Close to the road,

in 1889,

formed by two pilasters and two columns.

was decorated with marble,

It

and on the pavement lay a marble base, which no doubt supported a statue,
with a dedication to M. Aurelius by the Senatus Fidenatium, made during

some fragments of other

the lifetime of Antoninus Pius (140 A.D.) and

in-

and parts of two statues {Not. Scav. 1889, 108 EpJi. Epig. vii.
268-1
1
270, 1275). The Casale di Villa Spada,' the farmhouse immediately

scriptions

'

to the S. of the

period

4060; Bull. Com.

boundary stone

1891,

bearing

has

Two

Roman

also be seen in the

now disappeared

was very

inscription

attributed to the early part of the


It

It

327).

the

Q.F. L. Marci{tis) L.F.

Manili{iis)

ago.

edifice of the

and various fragments have been observed here {C.I.L

floor of the yard,


xiv.

upon a portion of a brick


some of its walls may

built

hill, is

the foundations of

Fid{enatiuni)

L.

Hi terminavere, which

diio virei

century

first

here that the

likely

public{uni)

B.C.,

was copied

fifty

is

years

{C.I.L. xiv. 4063).

other inscriptions of which

we have

record were probably found

in the curia.

The

C.I.L. xiv.

first (

4057)

is

a dedication of

Numen Domus Augustae

early in the second century) to the


or statue which

of

'

was restored by the Senate

The

producing

quarries of Fidenae are mentioned by Vitruvius

The

soft stone.

tufa here

is,

Its site is indicated

on the map a

Nibby [Schede,

i")

iv.

describes

it

{ibid.

(ii.

as a fact, not of a very


little to

the

as follows

7.

i)

4058)

sottili

con inter

is

a dedication to
as

good quahty.

S.W. of the F of Fidenae.


ruderi di una fabbrica di opera
'

e somiglia a quella delle

and date

and Pliny (H.N. xxxvi. 167)

posta principalmente del cryptoportico [a) con fenestre e feritoie nell' alto.

mattoni

of a building

after a fire (the place

discovery are unknown); and the other

its

unknown date (some time

terme Antoniane

La

forse e

laterizia

com-

costruzione e di

un avanzo

di villa

He then passes to the reservoir at the


o di una parte della Fidene romana (cf. Viaggio, i. 76).
la larghezza e
Villa
Edificio quadrato ad emplecton di scaglie di selce forse avanzo di conserva
'

'

di passi ord. 25 la lunghezza di 6. 8. [?]

occid.

hanno

The

ristaur

reference

is

il

lato setlentrionale e in parte rovinato

di

opera niista dei tempi

to

some volumes of Nibby's MS. notes now

il

ftieridionale

ed

bassi.'

in

my

possession {Papers,

C 2

i.

177

n.).

The

20
Gallienus
title

British School at Rome.

which the two chief magistrates of the place

(in

of dictator) by the Senate

The

found

itself

cannot have extended

village

there would have been no space for

about

100 yards to the N. of

Spada

itself a

it

tomb was discovered

rather more) just below the Villa

doorway leading

Ti(berio) Apronio Apolloni

From

Caracalla

which bore the stamp

of

tiles

The

inscription

no;

new reading

its

hie sepultus

est.'

which Fidenae

to

for

later

burials,

4o8e (reign of

of the Constantinian

;P

republished with the reading Atronio, with a

as though

or the old

for

inscription

Eph. Epig.vW. 1273; Bull. Coin. 1891, 326).

it

were a new discovery

Rendiconti Lincei, 1904, 391

cf.

kept closed

is

tomb

description of the

no

xv.

C.I.L.

and another, the Christian monogram

?)

period {Not. Scav. 1889,

the

Fab(ia) Apollonio

we learn for the first time the tribe


The tomb had apparently been made use of

one of the

while upon the

floor,

chamber was the

this inscription

belonged.

1905,

to the inner

f(ilio)

two chambers

1889, consisting of

in

cut in the rock, the outer of which had a mosaic


architrave over the

N. of the Curia, for

the

to

far

bear the

still

near the Villa Spada.'

'

at the foot of the hills: and, besides,

(or

it

1767

in

correct

is

in Bull.

Two

as the

full

Com.

Whether

Not. Scav. 1904, 402.

do not know,

better preservation.

tomb

is

rightly

hundred yards N. of the

Curia some tombs of the 3rd century A.D. were discovered, the bodies

being covered by

forming a pent roof; the

tiles

in

tiles

one case bore the

stamp C.I.L. xv. 831 (A.D. 123-128), and at the end of the tomb a marble
slab was fixed into the ground, which bore the sepulchral inscription {^Not.
Scav.

1889, 109

Eph. Epig.

vii.

1274).

Other sepulchral inscriptions

will

while two Greek inscriptions (Kaibel,

be found

IG.I

in

1688,

C.I.L. xiv. 4067,

refutes the

Guattani (writing

scavamento,

marmo

ma

in

con poco

reference

si

on the

di

Roman

Villa Spada,
staff
:

map.

Here,

in

latter

43

sqq.

and

tav.

an episcopal

see.

Spada tentato uno

non essendosi trovato che un* urna


'

stoffa

{Mon. Sabini,

ii.

ii,

messa ad

oro,

che

di
al

Whether the
Another part of

360).

seems doubtful.

Fidenae was situated to the N.E.


marked 62 metres above sea-level
a group of tombs and sarcophagi

village of

at the

one of the

recente in Villa

una richissima

to Castellani's excavations

is

were found

fu di

disfece al solito

the necropolis of the


the

'

profitto,

con un teschio coperto

tocco deir aria

of

1828) says

1689) of the Christian

De Rossi in Bull. Crist. 1892,


common idea that Fidenae was ever

period are dealt with by

who

4072

point
1883,

was decorated with a basrelief representing

Classical Topography of the


Theseus slaying

the Minotaur

inscription C.I.L. xiv. 4062.

{Arch.

Here was

(see the correction in Eph. Epig.

vii.

Roman Campagna. II.


Zeit.

1884,

273)

21

and bore the

also found the fragment ibid.

1267,

and

De

4059

Rossi, Bull. Crist. 1887,

153) belonging to the tombstone of a tribune of the 20th legion of the ist

or 2nd century A.D.

terra-cotta sarcophagus with the

stamp

C.I.L. xiv.

4073 and a lamp

bearing the stamp C.I.L. xv. 6557 were also found.


Besides the tombs, remains of a farmhouse, with the dolia arranged in

quincunx fashion, came


etc.

are

stamp.

villa

still

to be seen

Upon

the

to light {Not. Scav.

on the ground

same

hill,

but a

was discovered a few years

883, 372).

one which

little

later

Fragments of

brick,

saw bore an unknown

further to the

S.,

apparently, a

the atrium was paved with mosaic,

In the walls a
and architectural fragments of marble were present.
copy of the brickstamp C.I.L. xv. 375 (126 A.D.) was seen {Bull. Com.
1891, 327).

The next

hill

to the N.

is,

authors for the city of Fidenae.

as

we have

Nibby

ance of fragments of pottery (which

seen, the site selected

{Analisi,

ii.

by some

61)^ notices the

was unable to

find),

abund-

some remains

opus reticulatum near the S.W. angle of the plateau, and a subterranean passage cut in the rock (indicated also by Dennis, op. cit. 48, and D
in

on plan); which has been explored by Tomassetti

{op. cit. 78),

who found

that

1
In his earlier work, the Viaggio (i. 85) published in 1819, he states that squared blocks of
stone (not in situ) were to be seen, which must have belonged to the walls. At that time he placed
the arx at the highest point of the hill over the modern road, excluding Castel Giubileo from the

circuit of the town.

The

22
it

British School at Rome.


and

led to a reservoir with several branches

ing with the upper

entrance

is

air,

roundheaded, about

That, however,
(iv.

besides,

feet

in

communicat-

vertical shafts

the

Roman Campagna.

high and a foot and a half

The

in width,

like the exit of a drain.

and looks
Livy

common

of a type

22), the
if

it

could have been the cuniculiis by which, according to

Romans

penetrated into the arx

is

most improbable: and,

the arx was at Villa Spada, as Tomassetti rightly supposes

Spada a stronger position than Castel


Gori {op. cit. 9) speaks as if it
Giubileo), the passage is in the wrong hill
was at Villa Spada. Close by Dennis indicates a large cave (E), now closed

(though he

in error in calling Villa

is

by a

gate, but which, according to him, has

N.E. of which

ramifications

(to the

a shaft such as Tomassetti describes, one side of which

is

has been quarried away), and


hill

several

above the railway are several

tomb (G),^ and on the W.


more tombs.

Just beyond the site of the 6th milestone

a bridge over the Tiber,

in

side

of the

a modern road goes off to

the construction of which remains of a building

of the second century after Christ were discovered

among

the chambers

were two well preserved bath rooms with hypocausts, and fragments of
columns of porta santa (lasian) marble 038m. in diameter were found {Bull.
Lanciani conjectures that this building

Com. 1891,328).

may have formed

a part of the post station of Fidenae, relying on Eutropius {supra,

The road now

passes between the

hill

18).

of Castel Giubileo and the table-

The site of Castel Giubileo is a very fine one (Fig. i), and
that
the acropolis of Fidenae should have been placed there
was
natural
it
by some topographers. It appears to have been occupied in Roman times,

land on the E.

marble columns,

to judge from the existence of fragments of

traces of actual buildings exist.

there

(C./.i^. xiv.

hill

etc.,

though no

inscriptions that have been copied

4066, 4070, 4071) have very likely been brought from

the tombs of the Via Salaria.


slopes of the

The

have

history of the place

is

The

fallen in,

but

caves indicated by Dennis on the lower

may

still

given by Tomassetti

be traced.

{op. cit.

The mediaeval

80 sqq).

1
It may be noticed in passing that the tombs he indicates above the Casale di Villa Spada are
no longer visible perhaps owing to the fall of the rock. Some damage has very likely occurred to
Lanciani {St07-ia
though not at all recently as far as one can tell from quarrying.
the tombs

degli Scavi,

i.

205) mentions the letting of a quarry near Castel Giubileo in 1521.


Roman Campagna. II.

Classical Topography of the

From Castel Giubh.eo to Osteria Nuova

II.

{from

About

23

half a mile

and on the N. of

the Sixth to the Thirty-first mile).

beyond Castel Giubileo

the Fosso della Buffalotta,

is

the Casale di Sette Bagni, between which

it

On

railway are various remains.

and the

E. edge of the railway behind a

the

signalman's house are the concrete foundation walls (preserved to a considerable height) of a large

of which Gori

{op.

towards the E.

cit.

are

villa,

and further up remains

two water

reservoirs, to the

in

opus reticulatum,

tombs

22) speaks as though they were

easternmost of which,

situated close to the casale, Tomassetti appears to allude (p. 86

the arch

is

of brickwork, not of opus quadratum.

are large caves

and here Dennis

Further

of Fidenae.

the

to

To

n. 2),

the chief necropolis

50) places

N.E. on the top of the

and connected by openings placed

slightly

though

the E. of the casale

hill

chambers, each measuring 109 by

reservoir, with at least three


inside,

cit.

[pp.

while further

is

a large

metres

2*5

on the skew to one

another, so as to reduce the pressure, as in the so-called Sette Sale at

Golden House of Nero).

(really a reservoir belonging to the

22) wishes to place

Crustumerium

here,

the latter often reflects Fabretti's views, and


that

we must

Monimenta,

i.

Gori

following Cingolani and


it is

bounded on the N. by the Fosso

Fabretti's

in

company.

Malpasso, which

di

{op. cit.

Ameti

therefore probably here

place the building of opus incertuni, seen by Ciampini

67) on an excursion

Rome

is

The

Vetera
hill

is

joined by the

Fosso della Buffalotta just to the E. of the road which crosses them both

by the Ponte

di

of three periods

The

Malpasso.

bridge consisted until 1832 of remains

opus quadratum of

tufa of the original structure, a brick

arch with a double ring of brickwork, the stamps in which dated from

126-129 A.D. and were preserved by Nibby,^ and an arch of comparatively

modern
Sabini,

date.
i.

The

view

is

given (Nibby, Analisi,

identification of

refer rather to

the stream

by Guattani, Moti.

129)

with the Allia^ (Nibby seems to

the Fosso della Buffalotta, the

seems doubtful, inasmuch


^

i.

tav. 2 (opp. p. 43).

C.I.L. XV. 506b, 507b, 702.

as the distance from

From

Schede,

iv.

i'

it

more important of the two)

Rome

appears that

is

insufficient (/w/rrt).

ibid.

506a was also found.

C.I.L. xiv. 4064 (a fragment apparently of a sepulchral inscription) was copied 'in agro
<rrustumino ad Alliam by Dellefsen.
"^

'

The

24

Not very
theory

from

far

Via Salaria

British School at Rome.


according to Gell and Nibby,^ the ancient

this point,

the valley of the Tiber, and ran towards

left

however, a very improbable one, and

is,

The

Nomentum.

conditioned by the

is

Eretum at Grotta Marozza {infra, 71). The road which


as the Via Salaria is in all probability a mere deverticulum

desire to place

they indicate
(so Hiilsen

and Lindner, Alliaschlacht, 20

We may

n. 3).

makes a branch go to
the right from Fidenae to Nomentum and join the Via Nomentana there.
This may be what Nibby considers the original Via Salaria (Desjardins,
notice that the Tabula Peutincrerana

Tab. Pent, 176).

mile or more further on the Casale Marcigliana rises on a

No

the road.

plain marble sarcophagus in the courtyard

above

hill

traces of antiquity are visible there at present, excepting a

sepulchral cippus with

the

inscription

but Nibby

The

Lateran, and several architectural fragments.

and perhaps the architectural fragments

also,

excavations described infra, 48.

{op. cit.

Gori

{op. cit.

xiv.

C.I.L.

4065,

ii.

303) saw

now

in

the

inscription, however,

seems to have come from the


26) speaks of two

tombs

cut in the rock, with plaster lining, on the right of the high road below

Casale Marcigliana.

Beyond Casale Marcigliana no

traces of antiquity are visible for

some

distance, excepting a well preserved reservoir at the Torretta or Marcigliana

Vecchia,^ the path leading to which from the E.S.E. very likely follows the
line of

an ancient road.

The
at the

Allia,

from which the terrible defeat which the

hands of the Gauls

Romans

suffered

390 B.C. took its name, has been rightly


identified by Hiilsen and Lindner {op. cit.), following Westphal {Rom.

Kampagne,

127),^

in

Gell {Topography of

Kiepert, with the Fosso Bettina


18) place

it

about

at

11

,^ for

miles from

Rome and

both Livy

(v.

Rome, and

its

Vicinity,

and

43),

37) and Plutarch {Cam^

the former speaks of the

Op. at. 44 ; op. cit. iii. 634.


The view is not due to them, but may be found in the older
the Campagna, and in Holste {ad Cluv. p. 709, 1. 22).
Desjardins {Topographie du
Latiwn, 22) propounds the rather strange theory that this road was a somewhat late correction
of the original road
which, running along the river valley, would be liable to be interfered with by
^

maps of

floods

and that

it

did

Rotondo.
- This
is the
wrongly [infra, 50,
^

in

tiot

site

Nomentana, but returned

selected by Cluver

[Italia antiqua,

to the original road after

658,

1.

45)

for

Monte

Crustumerium but

51).

Cf. also Hiilsen in

Holste [ad Chiv.

]om. the Via

p.

Pauly-Wissowa, R.E.

709,

1.

23).

i.

1585.

This view seems, however, to appear

first

'

Classical Topography of the


stream as

'

But the two

Roman Campagna. II.

Crustuminis montibus praealto defluens alveo


accounts of the battle which

full

that of Diodorus

former putting

114)

(v.

on the

it

differ with regard

left,

we have

that

Hiilsen and Lindner

Rd)n. Forsch.

ii.

much

had already done {Hermes,

i.

i.

is

this fact,

city,

owing

to the difficulty of crossing the river.^

Rome and

Veii

accepted as historical events, he regards

inasmuch as

valley of the Cremera,

to

it

It

it

was near

which, even

does now,

if

as the

key

He

river.

out of crossing the

be

escaped, to Veii (and not


off the

passage to the
hills

than

while the absence of any effort on their

have been due to the

river

to

explains the

the river did not run closer to the foot of the

Rome may

all

to the position in all

that the Veientines, descending the

it

Gauls had already cut

quite conceivable

is

part to relieve

it

Roman army which

fact that the

in=

even admitting, as he does, that the

would naturally cross the

of that portion of the

Rome), by the

city

the

of

fact

from an attack delivered by an enemy on the right

repeated defections and recaptures of Fidenae are by no means

this warfare,

Alliaschlaclit

which, according to him, explains the importance of Fidenae

the early wars between

flight

irk

515

xiii.

view has not been accepted by Pais {Storia di

Roma, 281, n. i) nor by 'R\c\\\.q.x {Beitrdge zur rom. Topogr.


und Serviusniauer). The latter insists strongly on the
bank opposite the

The

debated.

a careful study of the ground, decide

Mommsen

297), but their

impregnability of

51).

of Livy and

the latter on the right bank of the Tiber.

{op. cit.) after

Rome

{infra,

'

to the site of the battle, the

question of the relative value of the two accounts has been

favour of Diodorus, as

25:

near the city and

difficulty already

pointed

the smallness

of their

to

numbers.

He

does not, however, touch the chief point

Lindner, that the ground on the

left

with either description of the battle

their explanation of the confusion

the Augustan period


^

There seems

to

is

also important

be some inconsistency

Befestigungen des republikanischen

ungen

bis in die Einzelheiten

festesten an der Tiberseite

invasion^though
uneinnehmbare,'
Stadtbefestigung

(i8/.).

it is

Roms

gut bekannt

and

on the

right.

two writers must count

made by Livy and

that

it

In this the
for

much

other writers of

may be due

to the fact that

argument die
und durch Beschreibdie so gut wie uneinnehmbare Befestigung war am

in

saying

{"j

Jin.) in connexion with this

'

sind durch die zahlreichen Reste


;

then (17 art^y?.) placing the present walls after the Gaulish
not denied that Rome had walls of some kind not, however, 'so gut wie
'

in

for 'jedenfalls hat die Gallierkatastrophe die


.

Hiilsen and

bank does not agree nearly so well

itself as that

military experience of the second of the

and

made by

dem Ansturm

eines grossen

Romer

dartiber aufgeklart, dass ihre

Heeres nicht Stand zu halten vermochte

The

26

British School at Rome.

the Lucaria were celebrated in a grove on the

between
flight

of

in luco

and the road, and were connected

it

some of

matter of

epit. p.

victi a Gallis fugientes e proelioibi

fact,

form of the

the festival

Roman

calendar {C.I.L.

'\P-

'

Lucaria festa

on the

in

bank of the Tiber they must have crossed

left

remain an open one

much
come to a

clear that there

it is

cannot say that

am

')

fuit,

while, as a

Another important question


coming from Clusium to

p. 298).

The

Miill.

seoccultaverint

higher up, and of this we hear nothing.

and

119

of far older origin and belongs to the oldest

is

with regard to the route taken by the Gauls

arrive

bank of the Tiber,

popular belief with the

colebant Romani, qui permagnus inter viam Salariam et Tiberim

pro eo quod

is

the fugitives thither (Fest.

left

in

prepared to

question

is

will,

at

it

some point

however, always

to be said on both sides,


decision.

Westphal notes some unimportant remains of ancient walls on the left


of the road after Marcigliana Vecchia (ty). <://. 127), while Cell considers the
mound on this side, almost opposite to it, to be a tumulus [op. cit. map).

The
2)2,

statues of Bacchus

and Ariadne (Visconti, Mus. Pio-Clem.


81,
have been found nel ristoramento della via che
conduce a Monte Rotondo and sent to the museum by order of
i.

tav. xliv, xlv) are said to

da Roma

'

'

Cardinal Rezzonico.

There are some remains of a villa in brick work between the Casale
Colomba and the high road. C.I.L. xiv. 3940, a sepulchral inscription
elegiacs,

was found

destroyed in

little

was

also informed that ruins

had been recently


the Vigna Valle Ricca, up the valley E. of Fontana di Papa.
here.

to the

S. of

forked, one

Monte
At Monte Rotondo it

the railway station, a path ascends to

Rotondo, which very likely follows an ancient

may have

S.
in

line.^

Mentana, another to join the


prolongation of the Via Nomentana, though there are no certain traces of

no reason

for

to

The town occupies

antiquity on either.
is

branch going

supposing that the

a fine position on a

site is that

hill,

but there

of an ancient city

Eretum

certainly was not situated here, as Raphael Volaterranus, Cluver {Italia

aniiqua,

p.

66y,

1.

54, and, apparently, if

and other authors have supposed


out,

it is

by no means

for,

as

silence gives consent, Holste)

Dessau

at the right distance

{C.I.L. xiv. p. 439) points

from Rome.

identification of the site with that of Crustumerium {op.

cit.

Nor can

Cell's

190) be defended.

Several sepulchral inscriptions have, not unnaturally, been collected in and


^

(iori (op. cit. 31)

thought

believed to be a milestone of

it

it

to

be the Via Salaria, and saw near the

first

chapel what he

Roman Campagna. II.

Classical Topography of the

27

near the town {C.I.L. xiv. 3932-3939^), though only nos. 3938-3939 seem to

be

their

them present

preserved, but none of

still

provenance

no case

is in

Stevenson notes

features of

any

and

interest,

certain,

Vat. Lat. 1055

1,

f 5)

'

iscrizione di Ereto

IRENETI D
VLCISSIMAE

DEO MAR

IN

TVRIVSPATER'
from the MS. of Fontanini

the Library of S. Mark's, Venice.

in

It is

obviously Christian.

Guattani {Mon. Sabini,


S.

Matteo

(or the

ii.

354) mentions

some excavations

Cappuccini Vecchi) made by a certain Federici,

busts and fragments of statues smaller than


entire Eros

the objects were presented

who were spending

people

Gori

where are
ancient

still

villa.

ancient

the

summer

size

life

He

to

some English

there.

W.

of the Cappuccini

says also that the road leading to the Casino dei Maoli
to that

is

running

S. to the

Fosso Ormeto

follows an ancient
A

be seen.

aqueduct, on the

half

way

to

La Mola, does

At La Mola

descends into the valley.

seems probable, however, that

We

not seem to be ancient

Tiber

(t^<?

it

fell

it

It

into a deverticulum from


latter left

intimately

site

of

14 miles from Fidenae {Tab. Feut.),

i.e.

connected with that as to the

19 miles from Rome, or 18 miles from


(v. 3. i. p.

just before

traces of antiquity are absent.

at this point

Eretum, which must be sought


Strabo

it,

have now to enquire at what point the

the valley of the Tiber.


is

fact

in

line,

there are, on the other hand, remains of a villa on the E, of

question

though no actual traces of paving


large bridge with twelve arches, belonging to an

W. of it,

the Via Salaria.

is

(zw/r^^, 49).

The road running due N. from Monte Rotondo probably


almost certainly

The

which

preserved C.I.L. xiv. 3938, 3939, occupies the site of an

the reference

are to

in

were found, and an

by the discoverer

63) considers that the house just

((?/.<://.

at Casale di

228) indicates

it

Rome

(///;?.

as a Sabine

Ant.).

village situated

above the

Sa/StV??? kco/xtjv inrlp tov Ti^epe(o<i KeLfiivqv) at the point

3937 was copied at the Osteria delle Capannuole i^ mile off on the high road.
See C.I.L. xiv. p. 439.

where

The

28

Nomentana

the Via

British School at Rome.

joins the

Via Salaria and not

Labanae (ra AajSava vhara, ovk

from the Aquae

far

airtcOev toutcov ['AXySoyXtwi/] eV

N(Ofiev-

rfj

Toh Trepl 'Hptjrov tottoi';, ibid. II, p. 238), cf Verg. Aen. vii. 711
Ereti manus omnis, oliviferaeque Mutuescae' (Serv. in. loc.
Eretum
oppidum dictum est diro -rr]^ "Hpa?, id est, a lunone, quae ilh'c colitur
ravfi KoX

'

'

'

Solin.

cf.

Dionys.

10).

ii.

(TTahl(ov kiTTii^ Kol kicarov


Be aTTO

miles

t/}?

^)

'V(0[xrj<i

There

much

is

I.

{infra,

iii.

88),

Guattani

Antica, vol.

iv.

p. 88),

Desjardins (7^^^.

/*^z//.

{op.

cit.

an

162

Marozza

N.W.

Mentana

the

appendix to Nardinis

is

town

There is no evidence for this, but it would be


what was the case at Labici and elsewhere.
Rotondo.

last

group of writers

all

place

it

way

little

in

Roma

Kiepert.

inclined to agree with

as to the site of the post station, but to put the original

The

of

All these views

Campagna Romana) and

della

Latium, 20)

cf.

to

143) at Grotta

Chaupy {Maison de Canipagne


Westphal {pp. cit. 128), Nibby

Vie degli Antichi

Canina {Carta

ii.

oldest topo-

at Fiora (ix. pt.

at Cretone.

xi.)

134),

i.

The

site.

Mannert

cit.

little

tab.

its

26),

but the truth was seen by

his article Delle

(in

Manzi, a

Casale

Reichard {Orb. Ant.

are erroneous
d' Horace,

iroTafiov.

difference of opinion as to

at

id. xi. 3. Biea-rrjKe

ardSia TeaaapaKovra Kal ckutov (17^

auTrj

Monte Rotondo {supra,


{op. cit. 201), Nibby {op.

Gori

71),

{infra, 71),

avroou Trepl iroXiv 'Hptfrov diro

at

it

521), Gell

p.

7roX,t<?

8'

dycov (13! nniles).

rrjf; 'Q)fir](;

ovaa Tt/Sepew?

irX-qaiov

graphers put

rj

32. <ylvTO

iii.

at

Canina

Monte

agreement with

a mile or so to the

E. of the modern road, on the low hills above it, the exact site depending
upon the view they take as to its distance from Rome. The line of the

road

is

at present

the spot.
ficant

The

nothing

anything but clear at

remains, too, which are to be seen are


is

several

to

more

rectangular shaft 30 or 40
in

no traces exist on

somewhat

insigni-

preserved above ground, and the indications on the

represent as a rule mere heaps of debris.


refers

this point, for

a line running E. and

municating with a pozzolana

pit,

W.

(The mark
feet

to the N. of

deep, of which

They

map

La Mola

there

are

are possibly shafts com-

but their date and

purpose

remain

more thorough exploration than I was able to make.)


Chaupy, on the other hand, who explored the ground in 1768, gives a far
uncertain without a

Cod. Urbinas 105 has e^vKovTa, which would make the distance 20 miles.
ad Cliiv. p. 668, 1. 25, who remarks that there is no contradiction between the
passages, as the site of the battle may well be described as near the town when it was only 33 stades
{i,\ miles) away.
^

Cf. Holste

Roman Campagna. II.

Classical Topography of the

more

definite account, which,

if it

in

leaves

the valley

Rome

(corresponding more or

its

entirety, leaves little

places the point where the Via Salaria

Tiber at about the

the

of

be accepted

He

doubt as to the site of Eretum.

29

less

with

the

i8th
17th

ancient

mile from

modern

mile) just

after the Ponte di Casa Cotta (which should be that just to the S. of the
Canf^ Casa Cotta of our map) where, he says, he saw traces of pavement,

some of

the stones being in situ, while others

this

From

had been removed.

point the ancient road diverged from the modern towards the

right,

'

vers

une eminence qu'on trouve couverte de ruines, qu'on reconnoissoit jusqu'au


careme dernier (1768) pour ceux d'une Cite, a un mur meme flanque
Le lieu se trouve
de tours, qui renfermoit beaucoup d'autres ruines.
d'autant plus pres de la riviere qu'elle forme justement la unecoudequi Ten
aproche'

{loc. cit).

little

further on (p. 91) he tells us that the

the place was Rimane, and adds


et autant par la

coit

effet tel

que

je

I'ai

le lieu

le

mur

jusqu'au Careme dernier.

j'y suis

Je

d'enceinte avoit disparu.

II

reparation du chemin, ce qui a

deux tems pour

caractere de ruines de Ville qu'il rendoit sensible.'

la

fait
j'ai

J'ai

en

revu

pendant

le

trouve que

fait

perdre aux

nature of the older ruins within the enceinte would be doubtful,

The

as he does not further describe them, did not Gell {op.


as being of opus reticulatum, of

traces.

avoit ete barbarement detruit

ruines

them

ruines des

I'avois

retourne aux Fetes de Paques

entre ces
le

of

ne s'annon-

les

ma Campagne

peint dans un voiage a

Carnaval,mais lorsque
tout

elle

que

lieu

du milieu remontent visiblement aux plus anciens.

que telavoit ete

name

L'enceinte n'etoit que de petite etendue,

maniere de ses Tours que par sa fabrique,

que pour un ouvrage des tems moiens, au

Edifices
dit

'

But that we have here the

which
of

site

cit.

204) speak of

cannot say that

saw any

Eretum (occupied apparently by

a mediaeval castle) seems increasingly probable from the fact that Chaupy,
in

going towards

across the

fields,

it

saw

from Torre Fiora {infra,


'

vis-a-vis I'Hotellerie

74), not

along the road, but

de Moricone a considerable piece


'

of ancient paving running towards the ruins he had discovered.^

He

was,

^
Guattani {Mon. Sabini, i. 47) speaks of traces of it seen by Prosseda a little while before he
'
voler riconoscere da questa parte il confluente
wrote, but says that they had been destroyed
:

e duopo volgere a sinistra (dalla


Nomentana) per la via che conduce a M. Libretti, e deviando a sinistra ancora giungere alia Collina
ove per quei campi non e difficile rinvenirne.
Lo Chaupy ve gli ha visti, ed anche
di Rimane
ultimamente il nostro Signor Prosseda.
Ma come campagnoli Sabini hanno spianato affatto gli
avanzi di Ereto cosi
selciaroli negozianti di vie hanno fatto man bassa sulle consolari antiche
massime sulla Nomentana che era forse la piii conservata.'

delle due vie per

mezzo

di selci rimasti in opera e fuor d'opera,

The

30
however,

in

attribute

it

British School at Rome.

some doubt (and

this

is

particularly unfortunate) whether to

Via Nomentana to Eretum, or to

to the prolongation of the

have been

\Vhat he imagines to

'

ce qu'on appela anciennement la vieille

Salaire,^ qui d'Eretum put tourner vers I'endroit dont je parle et passer au

appele

lieu

Madonna de

la

les vestiges les

la

Spiga

et sous

Monte

Libretti

du Prince,au

plus sensibles devant la vigne

lieu

ou Ton en
que

la

voit

nouvelle

mines des monumens qui en restent

suivoit la ligne droite tracee par les

Monte

vers I'Eglise de S. Antime,^ la tournoit un peu a droite par le bois de


Libretti, traversoit la Vallee qu'il borde, et

ne rejoignoit I'ancienne qu'apres

plusieurs milles sur la colline a la descente de la Vallee de N^rola par le

milieu de laquelle elle tournoit avec elle une colline que

le

chemin moderne

coupe.'

Gall

{op. cit.

precision

is

'

it is

upon the places mentioned by

exceedingly

this writer, or to

we have already said, incorrect


by his supposition that the Via
:

is

wrong,

ation

{^Papers,

any such road

important point

in

positive evidence,

'

{i.e.

are, as far as

me

to be of considerable

is

particularly unfortunate, as

know, to be found

the determination of the site of

true, that the

it is

Via Salaria

left

and this

Eretum

is

no
an

{supra, 27).

Casa Cotta

is

not

the river only there, for

probable that the road along the Tiber valley follows an ancient line

it is

(so

into

falls

a road running from the prolong-

discovery of pavement just N. of the Fonte di

The

mile xxi

must be that of which Chaupy

272) and they appear to

i.

The doubt as to the existence of


of the Via Nomentana to Rimane

traces of

is,

have already had occasion to make use of Chaupy's accounts of

what he saw
value.

'

the seventeenth mile of the lower Via Salaria

that which runs N. of the Colle del Forno)

speaks.

connect intelligibly

Salaria Vetus ran past Mentana.

supposing that the road which at

too, in

Nomentana from

the Via

with

fix

but his whole conception of the facts

vitiated

He

difficult to

His own theory, that Eretum was at Grotta Marozza,

his narrations.'

as

203) remarks that

Westphal,

given

in

loc. cit.)

Pasqui nel tracciare

We

Canina
"^

shall

falls into

He

though the account of the course of the Via Salaria

Not. Scav. 1892, 240

see

the

{infra,

same

74)

somewhat curious

'
:

solerti signori

Cozzae

that

this is

merely the continuation of the Via Nomentana.

error.

says above (p. 76),

immediatement.'

le

is

antiche vie della Sabina, avevano scorto che la

'

on en

voit les grands paves disperses

dans

la

montee qui

la

precede

Roman Campagna. II.

Classical Topography of the


Salaria,

Curi, passava, presso

venendo da

rasentando a sinistra

risaliva

on

of the Farfa

il

fiume Farfa, e quindi

mouth

sepolcro ora scoperto (near the

above

bank,

right

its

quale restava fuori

il

Tevere,

il

un frammento della

the

Florence) del

railway to

Hanno

cornice.

31

poi mostrato che

proseguiva verso Forum Novum, ora Vescovio.' That an ancient road followed
but it is equally certain that
this course may be treated as almost certain
:

it

was

not the Via Salaria proper.

seems to have diverged a deverticulum about half a mile N. of


Casa Cotta, to judge by a cutting through the hill to the W. of point 51,^
though the prolongation of it is not clear either to the N. or the S., and it

From

it

certainly cannot belong to the

Via Salaria

itself

The

as

know

little

before the 22nd

reaches the church which

Chaupy

now

it

my

mile, according to

{pp. cit.

must have gone

latter

straight on as indicated in the map, though no traces of

exist, so far

reckoning,

it

75) rightly believed to be that of

He saw
it stands still bears.
Anthimus, whose name the
^
there columns of granite, of one of which Stevenson observed a fragment,
hill

S.

on which

and, on the ascent immediately preceding

it,

pavement of the

traces of the

Stevenson {Bull. Crist. 1896, 160) mentions the church, of


ancient road.
which nothing but the apse of mediaeval work now remains standing, and
his discovery of the cemetery in which the martyr was buried a little way to
the E. of

tomb

is

Monte Maggiore.

The

distance from

Rome

of the site of his

variously given as the 22nd and the 28th mile (Kraus, Realency-

clopddie,

ii.

124).
itself may occupy an ancient site, but there are no
There are various ancient fragments in the garden,

Monte Maggiore
traces of antiquity.

including two cxxcwXds putealia with

of local provenance, but


Sciarra, to

whom

of the villa itself

reliefs.

may have been

is

partly formed

should imagine that

it

was

One

by a block of marble
left

rough

bearing the following fragmentary inscription


I

of these are necessarily

brought here from

the villa until recently belonged.

no doubt, the lower part being

None

for

Rome by

Prince

of the doorsteps

(the half of a cippus,

insertion

in

the ground)

to this cutting that the following note of Stevenson's

Vat. Lat.

D. Carlo Villari mi dice che dopo Monterotondo sulla via ferrata si


1896.
33) refers
vede come una strada antica che attraversa la tenuta di Montemaggiore.' I do not think the course
of the Via Salaria itself can be so easily detected that it could be seen from the railway.
1055 1,

notes,

'

f.

For

now

all this district

in the

Vatican

much
(

valuable information

is

Vat. Lat. 10551, 55 sqq.).

contained in a volume of Stevenson's

MS.

The

32

British School at Rome.

PAP
S

O C R A)

VE

The

letters are

Just S. of

I,

high.

Monte Maggiore runs

the

modern road

This appears to follow an ancient

{infra, 74).

on

mm.

65

11

line

to

there

Monte

Libretti

no pavement

is

some of the windings of the present road,


two pavingstones /;/ situ in the bank on the S. side of

the older track which cuts off

but there are one or


the cutting a

way

little

above the present

to the

W.

of the Casa Falconieri, about 2 metres

level.

There are no

traces of the

Via

Salaria, so far as

know, on the

descent from Monte Maggiore to the Fosso Carolano, but immediately


after this

is

crossed

its

may be clearly seen ascending


On its S.E. edge are traces
2).

line

through a deep cutting (Fig,


running parallel to

it,

mainly

in brick

35 N. of E.

of buildings

they have only recently been laid

bare by the removal of the brushwood, the ground having been newly

brought under cultivation, and have been much destroyed, so that


debris

is

visible

above

white marble, from a

ground.

tomb

little

but

saw a fragment of a pediment

in

or small shrine, the top of a sepulchral cippus

was preserved), a threshold block of


sandstone V(^2 m. long by 0'68 wide, and a fragment of a brick pilaster
(none of the

inscribed

portion

covered with plaster painted red, measuring 42 by


to

show that

portance

this large

'if>

cm.

This

may serve

group of buildings must have been of some im-

possibly they are the ruins of a halting-place

way between Eretum and Vicus Novus.


date, except a fragmentary brickstamp,

not preserved), bearing the inscription

There

is

on the road

half-

nothing to indicate a

round or lunate (the whole curve

is

Roman

Classical Topography of the

P- P

Campac^na.

II.

33

5EP0NM

FIGL

OS
V/VV
which

so far as

is,

know, unpubHshed.

cited, describes his exploration in

to his notes that

of which

am

in his

notes already

end (near the Fabbrica Palmieri)

road, beginning from the further


is

Stevenson,

October, 1896, along this section of the

indebted for

my

knowledge of

its

and

it

The

existence.

have just spoken he apparently did not see, as the


brushwood had probably not yet been cleared
nor does he notice the
ruins

cutting which

But he brings forward a most important

have mentioned.

piece of evidence that this road

is

the old Salaria, and that the

modern road

(which runs by Fara Sabina station, and there turns eastwards) follows a
different course, namely, the inscription

upon the bridge by which the modern

road crosses the Fosso Corese, which runs thus


P.

M. Ordo

et

'
:

agrum Curensem
praestabat, et viam

pontem

auctoritate d.

a solo

Pii. vi.

et

querceta Nerulana aquarum alluvies et negligentia

novam stratam

iter

commeantibus tutum

lapide inter utriusque fines aperuerunt

ex pecunia publica

et conlatitia fecerunt

(etc.

dated

Stevenson comments as follows 'The inscription speaks of an

1793)-'

absolutely'

new

Nerulana,"

i.e.

road, which

would join the old one precisely "ad querceta

at the Colle delle Sterparelle (the hill to the N. of the P^osso

Carolano, which the road crosses diagonally), upon which

between the territory of Nerola and that of Monte


portion

n.

Populus Reatinorum, quod Salariam veterem quae est inter

superiorum temporum penitus interceperat nee

et

Ex

still

is

the boundar\-

Libretti,

and where

remains of the ancient oak forest which once covered

this

We

must suppose that the Salaria diverged from the modern road
before the station of Fara Sabina, and perhaps ran along the side of the

district.

Fosso Carolano up to the point where


certain that there are

I have discovered its remains


it is
no traces of the ancient road between the station and

the Fabbrica Palmieri. while traces

may

be observed further

on.'

It will

be plainly seen from this account that Stevenson was not clear as to the
course of the Via Salaria nearer

Rome

I was
on the spot that the old road had come up the valley of the Fosso
Carolano, and not down from Monte Maggiore.
No traces, however, exist
:

it is,

however, noticeable that

told

in

the

valley,

traversed

it.

though one may

fair!)-

suppose that a dcv^rticiilnui once

The

34

little

British School at Rome.

way beyond, on the S.E.


is embedded in

side of the line of the road, a large

the ground

block of pudding-stone

tomb: and

foundations of a

where the old

would

line

may be

limestone

seen

in

little

it is

probably part of the

further on again, just before the point

modern path, several pavingstones of


Near the point where a modern

fall

into the

the

field walls.

path diverges N.N.E. the large blocks of limestone of the crepido are to be

Near

seen running 35 E. of N.

this

point Stevenson

seems to have

observed the remains of several buildings on each side of the road, especially

The

of water reservoirs.
of my

visit,

but

corn was already fairly high

saw the platform of a

Near the conjectural

site

two seem to be

in situ

in places at

many more

blocks from

t)\Q

Here

is

crepido of the

The Via

in

width, and S.E. of

it

are remains of substruction

is

to speak of that road {infra, y6),


station,

Here

the Fabbrica Palmieri.

by the prolongation of the Via Nomentana, with which


Fara Sabina

direction

Salaria soon reaches the Osteria della Creta (the house at

218 metres), just beyond which

come

its

a large reservoir with four chambers, one of which

measured as 3^90 metres


walls.

new

on the S.E. edge of the modern path, and give

the width of the road as 4*50 metres (just over fifteen feet) and
as 30 E. of N.

the time

on the N.W. of the road.

of the 25th milestone the road reaches a

house, and here in a field wall are

road

villa

joined

it is

shall deal

when

and also by the modern road from

which probably does not follow an ancient

must, however, mention a few remains near to

its

course,

and

We

line.
it

may be

well to include a few remarks on the site of Cures.

To

the

W.

of the Osteria della Creta are the foundations of a

no other ruins are

visible until
villa

platform

rough

is

built in

we

reach the Grotta S. Andrea, which

with a cryptoporticus on

platform of a large

opiis qjiadratiun

The Grotta Volpe, some way


another reservoir

will

villa,

its

S.

is

and W. sides

but
the
the

of conglomerate, and concrete.

to the

S.,

is

a water reservoir

and

be found further W., just to the N. of the modern

some distance to the S. of which, on the slopes above the Fosso


is some brick debris.
Just before we reach the bridge over the Fosso Corese, a path
diverges N.N.E. and then almost due N.
This is the line given by
road,

Carolano, there

Kiepert {Carta deW Italia Centrale) as


The modern road to Fara Sabina on

may

that of the road leading to Cures.

the

W. bank

of the Fosso Corese

also follow an ancient line.

The

site

of Cures and the excavations of 1874-5 ^^e described by

Roman Campagna. II.

Classical Topography of the


Lanciani

Coimnetitationes PJiilologae in Jionoreni

in

411 sqq.:

while their continuation in

The

1877, 245.

site

1877

in

{i^jj),

Not. Scav.

with two summits, round

hill

Nibby's

Fosso Corese.

base of which runs the


that

of a

consists

Mommseni

TJi.

mentioned

is

35

idea

{Analisi,

the

537)
included the whole triangle between the Fosso Corese and the

it

E. as point

F'osso Carolano, as far

western summit was occupied by the

on our map,

181

Some

itself

and of the cutting which separated

citadel,

were recognized

The excavations brought


4976,

4979,

4982

tiles,

and the lower ground

it

from the

home

the

of the

town,

were discovered.

C.I.L. ix. 4957, 4961, 4970.

discovered

there

Titus

of

given

are

4953, 4971, and C.I.L. xv. 401, 849,

{ibid.

2393), and some remains of private houses.


Cures is, as is well known, connected with the

as

walls

rest of the

to light a part of the principal temple, the

previously

others

4962, 4963), the hdiths

Rome,

citadel

traces of the

which were found the inscriptions

(in

The

by the

while in the necropolis a few graves of the imperial

period, the bodies being buried under

forum

absurd.

necropolis, the eastern

(here stands the church of S. Maria degli Arci),

between the two by the city

is

i.

earliest

ibid.

1036,

history of

who, according to the legend,

Tatius,

At the
founded the Sabine settlement on the Ouirinal, and of Numa.
place,
unimportant
beginning of the imperial period it is spoken of as an
but the inscriptions seem to indicate that
in

the 2nd century

The

classical

Mommsen
iv.

A.D., as

in

18 14, while Tomassetti {op.

Rome,

from

Alexander

In

place.

{Bicll.

'

{e.g.

is

regard

to

is

it

in

summarized

by

Pauly-Wissowa, R.E.

119 sqq) deals fully with the mediaeval

territory

of

of Cures,

SS.

25th

mile

Hyacinthus,

and

near the

Tiburtius,

after

having identified the

site

by means of

4962, was so pleased with the discovery that he


the Casino d'Arci, and proposed to collect there
of the antiquities of the town {op. cit. iii. 79).

C.I.L. ix.

established himself in

map,

rose to greater prosperity

1880, 107).

Crist.

whatever he could find

About

cit.

the

it

of the country towns of Italy.

and by Hulsen

cemetery

was the

Capmartin de Chaupy,
the inscription

with

literature

C.I.L. ix. p. 471,

history of the

many

did so

a mile

the ruin

and a half

known

to the

W.

of Cures, outside the limits of our

as the Grotte di Torri,

which by some writers

Cluver, Italia antiqua, and Galletti, Gabio antica cittd di Sabina scoperta

ove e ova 1 orri ovvero

le

grotte di Torri)

was supposed

to

be an ancient

city,

The

36

British School at Rome.

while others have found in

The

it

the site of a temple (Chaupy,

ruins consist, however, as a fact, of an

op. cit.

iii.

82).

enormous rectangular platform,

measuring about 96 by 93 metres, having an outer wall faced with quasihorizontal work, very neatly jointed, with the faces of the blocks smoothed.
Inside this external wall a cryptoporticus, the walls of which are faced with

opus incertum, can be traced on

W.S.W.

sides except on the S.S.E.

all

there are two passages, the outer

y^j metres

in

and on the

width, the inner

4 metres, the first of which is lighted by slit windows, O'6'j by 0'i3 metre
on the outside, where they pierce the external wall. In the centre of the
platform

is

a large water reservoir, above which

metres, surrounded

'J'^'6

The

by a gutter of

is

a courtyard i3'6o by

slabs of travertine.

from the face of the external

total thickness of the outer wall,

blocks to the face of the opus incertum of the cryptoporticus.

V2 metre, the external wall being only a single block


no possibility could

it

have stood alone

attempts that have been

made

to see

primitive city are therefore futile


villa

of

Roman

date.^

to a height of

has recently been described

It

Pont if. d'Archeologia, Series

ii,

vol. vii,

of the blocks of the

three phalli together (see Fig.


a

lion.

It

may

at

S.

Pietro, a

or near the point (181 on the

of Corese.
Moil. Sabini,

Gell

Ann.

336;

ii.

left

Inst.

was found, which


was found with

it,

still

cit.

church

1829,

we may now

b}'

Accad.

angle are

which

apparently

66;

1834,

again

Grotte

stood

at

off to the village

Torri (such

di

has

193)

Guattani,

as

Fonteanive,

106;

return to the Via Salaria, which

Stevenson notes that at the precise

modern road

lost.

deW

correctly at

to

Moricone a marble sarcophagus

serves as a fountain at the Osteria,

being

of a

Ro?nana, 52) are of no great importance.

at the Osteria della Creta.

point of divergence of the

by

The

a paper

in

W.N.W.

map) where the road turns

della Provincia

After this digression,

we

{op.

perfect)}'

Other descriptions of Grotte

Avanzi Cidopici

ruins

in Dissertazioni

side at the

be worth noting that

and not

Torri,

metres.

and on the N.N.W. side (low down)

misunderstood Chaupy, who places these


di

351 sqg. Figs. 9-14.

W.S.W.

3),

only

nothing more than a very large

Giovenale (well illustrated with photographs)

On one

4 or

building the

this

in

is

it

is

thick, so that

its

cover,

Just N. of this building, on the

which

W. edge

of

the road, are the foundations of an ancient building, and on the hill a mile
to the N., to the
^

E. of the

Casa

S.

Croce,

Galletti nicntion.s the discovery of a lar^e

dolium

is

the platform of a villa

lliere in his

time (1757).

Roman

Classical Topography of the

At the 27th

(Vespignani, Ajih. Inst. 1834, 107).

we reach

the Ponte Mercato

This would correspond

width.

in

II.

37

(ancient) mile from

Rome

the present bridge

remains of an older one, not necessarily of


metres

Ca^h'agna.

new, but there are

is

Roman

date, in concrete, 3-35

with that of the

well

fairly

Ponte Buido, given by Marchese Persichetti, who, excluding the crepidines,


estimates the width of the actual roadway at something under 3 metres.

On

edge of the old road

N.

the

tomb a round mass

is

of

chamber with three rectangular niches^


Beyond this a line of stones marks
lined with brick and opus reticulatum.
the course of the old road, which crosses the modern just before the

concrete, within which

is

a square

N.E. direction.

site

of the 28th milestone, and

The

older highroad ran almost due N. from the Osteria Merola, forming

follows a

Rome

the boundary between the provinces of

and, further on, that between the

Whether

follows an

this

Salaria ever went


it

{siipra,

8)

that

valley in an

and Perugia

communes of Fara Sabina and


not whether, indeed,

ancient line or

way

do not know, as

The roadway

Salaria can be clearly traced.

On

the crepidines 0'6o m. each.

way,

Ponticelli.

the Via

have not yet explored

but through the valley of which

for a little

have spoken the Via

about 6 metres wide, and

is

the S.E. side of

it,

on a projecting

hill, is

a large platform, upon which are some unfluted columns of puddingstone


0"6o m. in diameter

an ancient

site,

Not

times.

the place bears the

though a church

far off

(where

name

may have

still

this

is

in

alone

by which the road

of the valley, which

it

in

in brick

is

local

is

later
is

little

further on,

and concrete.

Three

embank-

conglomerate, with the N.W. side

supported

now abandons

it

served to supply

the so-called Ponte del Diavolo, an

opus quadratum of

ment wall
free,

may have

springs in the neighbourhood.

below the road, are the remains of a building

hundred yards beyond

been erected there

have marked a 'drain' on the map)

roundheaded channel cut in the rock, which


water, as there are

of S. Margherita, but

in its

ascent on the S.E. slopes

for the time.

It is

about 20 metres

in

length, with a turn in the middle, according to the plan of Vespignani {Ann.
Inst. cit.

Tav. C), 7*40 metres

width. 1

There

is

in

height at the highest part, and 10 metres

a parapet on the

N.W.

side

60 cm.

in width,

in

while that on

It will he seen, too,


it only 4 metres, but I quote my own measurement.
measurements of his plan do not agree with those of his elevation, the latter being,
Apparently the scale of the former is about one half too small, which
it would seem, correct.
would make the total length about 40 metres.
1

Vespignani makes

that the


The

38

British School at Rome.

the S.E. side, which must have served as a footpath,

metres wide.

from the

S.

is

no

less

than 230

There are eight buttresses, and between the fifth and sixth
is an aperture for drainage rS/ metre in height, and

end there

varying in width from 17 metre at the top to r42 at the bottom, the
two upper side stones converging sHghtly. The blocks are practically
rectangular, the vertical joints not being always quite perpendicular, and

The

are large, from 65 to 75 cm. in height.

and the buttresses project from 65


central

of

portion

bridge

this

lowest course projects slightly,

to 80 cm.

(a

view

the

Madonna

of

4 shows a view of the


which is also given by

Fig.

Vespignani).

mile and a half further

two miles on the


8)

site

and here we may

is

della Querela,

of the post station of ad Novas or Vicus


fittingly

which we have already followed

and a short

Novus

abandon the study of the Via

for a considerable distance

strictly speaking, the limits of the

{supra,

Salaria,

beyond what

are,

Roman Campagna.

VIA NOMENTANA.
I.

From the Porta Collina to the Ponte Nomentano


{from the First

The Via Nomentana^


Porta Collina

itself,

to the

Third

mile).

diverged to the right from the Via Salaria at the

and, running to the S.E. of the present Via Venti

Nomentana of the Aurelian wall, 75


modern Porta Pia. It had two semicircular
the right hand of which, now removed, stood upon

Settembre, soon reached the Porta

metres

to the S.E. of the

towers with square bases,

Homo, op. cit. 243). Immediately


to the S.E. of it is a small postern (Lanciani, Forma Urbis, 3}.
An interesting discovery made close to the N.E. angle of the Castra
At a distance of 10-50
Praetoria is recorded in Not. Scav. 1888, 733.
metres from the wall of the camp a building orientated in correspondence

the

tomb of Q. Haterius

with
1

from

it

{C.I.L.

vi.

1426

was found, which from the brickstamps found

in its wdiWs {C.I.L. xv.

It may be well to remark that Ovid, when he tells us (Fasti, iv. 905 sqt/.) that, on his return
Nomentum to Rome, he met the procession going to the grove of Robigus, which was situated

Via Claudia, was not returning to the city itself, but to his gardens, which
were on the right bank of the Tiber, near the bifurcation of the \'ia Elaminia and the Via Claudia

at the 5th mile of the

(Mommsen

in

C.I.L.

i-.

316).

Classical Topography of the Ro>l\n Canhwgna.


1578a) belonged to the time of Diocletian, and which

II.

at a

lay

39

level

considerably (3'50 metres) below that at which the foundations of the camp
commence. This fact indicates that it was Aurelian who lowered the
in
it
level of the ground outside the camp, when he incorporated
the line of his city wall, and not Honorius, as might have been supposed

(Homo, op. cit. 267).


About 60 metres of
Villa Patrizi, on the right
{Bull.

Com. 1886, 156

The road

takes

though the ground

was flanked by
to

is

Not. Scav. 1886, 160).

not

many

pavement of the road were found in the


of the modern road outside the gate, in 1886

the

curiously

indirect course,

Forma

difficult (Lanciani,

winding considerably,
Urbis, 3,4).

Its

course

tombs,^ though an e.xtensive cemetery does not seem

have been connected with

it.

Some 250

metres to the E. of the road, to

the N. of the Castra Praetoria, the remains of a villa were discovered in

Feb. 1869, which perhaps belonged to Trajan {Forma Urbis,


7263, 7304),- and a

little

to the N. of this

(Marucchi, Catacombe Romane, 341,


diverged from

pavement was

the Via
laid

bare

.57^.).

Nomentana
1888,

in

to

is

cit.

the catacomb of S.
little

C.I.L. xv.

Nicomedes

to the N. of these a road

the E.S.E. at right angles

and found

^
;

to be 3 metres in width,

its

and

to have been flanked by tombs of the late republican or early imperial

period,

which belonged the fragmentary inscriptions

to

C.I.L.

32899,

vi.

A large Mausoleum
36718, and a fine sepulchral relief of husband and wife.
is indeed shown on the N.N.E. side of the road by Bufalini.
point the remains of a building which was probably a bath were

At one

found on the N.N.E. edge of the road


discovered a

little

and the atrium of a

to the N. at the Vaccareccia

some years

had been

villa

before.

These

took place during the prolongation of the Viale dei Parioli

discoveries

(under the

name

fragments

of

of Viale della Regina) in 1888* and in

fluted pilasters of giallo

For the various discoveries made

antico

making the drains

(Numidian marble) were

in the Villa Patrizi see Not.

Scav. and Bull.

(from 1885 onwards).


The first of these pipes

Coin,

passim

is attributed by Dressel to Augustus.


same place another road ran southwards to the Praetorian Camp it is described
as having been found about 500 metres from the gate, on the right of the modern road, and as
It lay 170 metre below the modern level and was 2'5o metres in width
running from N. to S.
{Not. Scav. 1903, 93; Bull. Com. 1903, 290).
The tomb inscription, Kaibel, I.G.I. r!^^4, is given as having been found 'in vinea viae
Nomentanae' while 2069 was found on the same road in 1601. Both are recorded by Sirmond.
* Some remains of a Christian cemetery were also discovered [Bull. Com. 1888, 148, 174)'^

About

the

The

40

British School at Rome.

amoni;

found and some brickstamps

Further details

A.D.).

The

1889, 89.

Agnese

road,

will

be found

in

them

C.I.L. xv. 283,

Not. Scav. 1888, 734

prolonged, would soon

if

fall

1279 (ist cent.


:

Com.

Bull.

q.{.

into the Vicolo di S.

(the Vicolo di Tietralata of the Pianta del Censo, 1839J, itself an

ancient road (shown

in

Bufalini's plan)

which diverges from the Via Cupa

Camp, and runs

{tufra, 93) to the E. of the N.E. angle of the Praetorian

Via Nomentana

parallel to the

for a while, then

sending off a branch (also

ancient) nearly at right angles, which returns to the main road a

little

before

Agnese is reached. Whether the prolongation of the former road


beyond this branch, towards the valley of the Anio (or, indeed, its
prolongation S.VV. towards Rome), is ancient or not, is uncertain but in the
S.

portions indicated the existence of pavingstones can even

In the vineyard at No. 4 of the Vicolo di Pietralata a tomb,

as proof.

covered

cappucina

alia

'

another) with

tiles

'

by two rows of

{i.e.

tiles

inclined towards one

bearing the stamps C.I.L. xv. 595a, 1075b, was found

1901 at the considerable depth of 12 metres below ground

423

now be adduced

{A^ot.

in

Scav. 1901,

Com. 1901, 285).

Bull.

The pavement

of the

metre below the present


of the Via Cagliari

already crossed

to

Via Nomentana was found

level,

{Not. Scav. 1902, 358

the

Bull.

1902, at

Com. 1902, 206) and

of the modern road

left

in

r8o

under the modern road, close to the angle


it

had

by the time that the

we have spoken diverged from it


for in the
construction of the Viale della Regina, in 891, its pavement was discovered

deverticulum of which

63 metres to the

members
1889, 70

Bull.

was not discovered) the


to

is

They

vi.

too

34357).

on both) 12

cippi were found

feet.
full

The

tomb (which

to the inscription

cippi are said, however,

13 feet.

The measurement
we must subtract
340 metres, which

taken from centre to centre, in which case

{Not. Scav. 1904, 195

little

far off {Not. Scav.

angle of the Via Novara and

half the width of each cippus) and then

{i.e.

Two

which was according

have been found 3-90 metres apart a

50 cm.

with four busts of

limited the area belonging to a

front line of

practically identical

may have been


is

C.I.L.

relief

was found not

in 1904, still in situ, at the

Via Alessandria.

(which

(the Aletii)

Com. 1889, 216

on the same side


the

(N.W.) and a sepulchral

same family

of the
;

left

Bull.

we get

Com. 1904, 200).

On

the

either about

same

side

200 {Not. Scav. 1900, 192) or ioo{Bull. Com. 1900, 233)


metres beyond the Viale della Regina, a sepulchral cippus of the usual type

still,

A fragment

of a Greek inscription (no doubt from a tomb) was found.

Roman Campagna. II.

Classical Topography of the

4'

further back, in laying the foundations of a

was found.

On

new church

of S. Joseph, a round shaft lined with opus reticulatum, 7-50 m.

the right, a

little

deep, leading to a passage cut in the rock, and fragments of statues were

found {Not. Scav. 1904, 158

Bull.

Com. 1904, 357).

The road now descends somewhat

From

sharply.

the point

we have

reached, the exact course of the road as far as S. Agnese has until lately
been somewhat uncertain, though it can never have been far from the

modern

road,^ but the

pavement was discovered

in

1902 near the turning off

of the Via Pasqualina at the bottom of the descent,

in

making the new

connexion with the widening of the modern road, at 2 metres


below the present ground level. A sepulchral cippus was discovered at the
same place, at a depth of 4-50 metres {Not, Scav. 1902, 468 Bull. Com.

sewer

in

Further details would, however, have been welcome, especially

1902, 208).in

view of the doubt as to the course of the road

we do

not

know how

much of the pavement was discovered, nor whether the direction in which
If only a few stones were
the road was running could be determined.
found,

is

it

that

quite possible

they only

belonged

The widening of the road has led to the discovery


number of tombs (many of them columbaria) on the
Torlonia and the Villa Mirafiori, and

to a deverticulutn.

of a

considerable

right in the Villa

nearer to S. Agnese,

and of two

small Christian burying places in the former villa {Not. Scav., Bull. Com.
1902, igoT), passim

At

S.

Agnese

Bull. Crist.

(if

{Basiliques et Eglises,

1903, 285),

not before) the ancient road must coincide with the

The church and

modern.

1902,258

468

the

catacomb are dealt with by Marucchi


To the W.N.W. is the round

Catacovibe, 347).^

the
is wrong in stating that the ancient road crossed the modern after
Agnese and through the valley liy the Sedia del Diavolo [infia, 45).
2 A comparison of these two accounts, which are both from the same pen, will show an extreme
In the former the site of the
case of the difficulty to which I have alluded above (3, 4).
^

Bartolini {S. Agnese,

18)

Villa Torlonia, passing N. of S.

discovery

is

the latter as

described as
'

'

presso

il

muro di recinto dell'


Nomentana (from

dall' altro lato della via

Istituto delle

Suore della Provvidenza,'

the Villa Torlonia) presso

Timbocco

della

To one unfamiliar with the nomenclature of the streets of the newest quarters of
not always to be learnt from the ordinary maps, neither description is of very much
use
and there is considerable danger that it might be supposed that two different places wx-re
referred to.
But, further, the discovery of the pavement of the road is mentioned only in Buli. Com.,

via Pasqualina.'

Rome, which

is

while for the measurements of the cippus and to learn the depth at which it was found, one must go
method of
It would seem to the unprejudiced observer that it would be a better
to Not. Scav.
the course at present
proceeding to give a complete account of the discovery in one periodical
:

adopted

somewhat annoying

Class. Rev. 1903,

1904, 137).
329
We
3 The .sepulchral inscription, Kaibel, I.G.I. 1857, was found here in the i6th century.
may notice the discovery in the restoration of 1620 of the series of eight basreliefs, which are
is

(cf.

The

42

British School at Romk.

mausoleum of Constantia,
attached

ccmetei-}'

removed from

it

to

now

is

dau^^^hter of Constantine, with the circus-shaped

{Papers,

it

The porphyry sarcophagus


no. 322).
The
are well known wcjrks of the
Those of the dome were

20).

ii.

the Vatican (Ilelbig, Filhrer,

in

mosaics whicli adorn the vaulting of the

aisle

i.

4th century {cl Marucchi, Catacoinbe, 365).


destroyed in the 17th century, but drawings of them exist in the sketchbook of Francesco d'Olanda in the Escurial (cod. 28-I-20 f. 22,

2f

reproduced

by

Egger,

HandzeicJinungen der
op. cit. n.

Eton

(iv.

k.k.

Kritisches

der

VerzeicJinis

Hof-Bibliothek in Wien,

taf.

Cf. Bull. Crist. 1883,

in Vienna (Egger,
Windsor {Vzti. 18)

ii.)

104) Berlin {Kunstgewerbemusetini, A. 376,23)

96)and elsewhere.

architcktonischen

93 ^qq- for references to

MS. of Ugonio at Ferrara, in which these mosaics are described in


detail.
The common name Temple of Bacchus was no doubt applied
the

'

to

it

'

from the character of the mosaics of the circular

vintage scenes, and are largely pagan in character.^

aisle,

which represent

That the circus-shaped

enclosure in front, supported by lofty substructures, the whole being in

i.

74).-

mixtum,

opus

inferior

di.scoveries of
'

A S.

tombs recorded

Agnese

grande incolonnato
alte

served

also

(i)

as

cemetery

proved by the

is

by Flaminio Vacca {mem.

fuori di porta Pia, vi e

accanto

il

A,J in

tempio

di

Fea, Misc.

Bacco con

forma ovata.^

di

Ivi sotto furono trovate molte grotte


un uomo, larghe da cinque palmi, tutte foderate da ogni intorno con

lastre di

marmo.

lo

non so giudicare a che servissero anticamente

essendovisi trovate delle ossa,

si

crede fossero de' martiri,

ma

quali in quel

now

in the Palazzo Spada (Helliig, /VZ/iw, ii. 1:05.989-996: two


others in the Capitol, ibid. i.
469, 470, belong to the same set).
The place whence they came is uncertain at S. Agnese they
were used as building material, while the other two were found, one in the Piazza
SS. ApostoJi, the
other on the Aventine.
A statue of Hercules (wrongly restored as killing the Hydra) also in the
:

Capitol,

was found here

no. 439,

cf.

Bartoli,

{ibid.

nieiii.

i.

no. 412)

and so was the statue of the drunken old woman

100, in Fea, Misc.

Vedennius Moderatus, who


was also found close to S. Agnese in 1816.
Mitt. 1904,255).
For later discoveries see
<2.

antiquities ibid. 1901, 14,


^

Excavations

in

489

the

have served as

1902, 366.

interior

of a baptismal font
to

{ibid.

i.

The

cippus bearing the funeral inscription of


rose to be architect us arinanientarii imperaloris {C.I.L. vi. 2725)

{Not.

i.

It

250).

has an interesting relief of a


.Scav.

1885, 251

Roman

1901, 423;
See also Addenda, infra, 208.

A^'i?/.

Scav.

1888,

507,

570,

732)

led

catapult {Rotn.

and
to

for

Christian

the discovery

and several fragments of inscriptions the building would seem, therefore,


a baptistery at one time, though it is probable that this was not its original
:

purpose.
^ Vacca, mem. 124, records on his
father's authority the discovery in the Vigna of Angeluccio
da Viterbo near S. Agnese of the statue of a sow in the mouth of which was a metal plate with the

xn'izxv^Kior^ampliussilaboraveris.

Whether there is any truth in any part of the story I hardly know.
Fea's note (la forma e rotonda) shows that he misunderstood the reference,
which is not to the
mausoleum itself, but to the space in front of it.
3

Classical Topography of the


luogo stessero per paura de' tiranni
21, 22)

me

(3)

by Fea

il

recinto avanti ad essa era

un Cemeterio

marmo,

sopra terra;

Cavalli, o

carrette

del

purpose

In the garden attached to S.

Ippodromo, o

1.

is,

Agnese

...

o,

is

In the

'

quale

si

il

rilevo

primo Cemeterio

Circo

per corse di
e

the inscription C.I.L.\\. 146^

which

Mondo

lei,

ii.

da

fatti

antiquari,

Rome. 20) referred to


the Golden House of Nero but the point
il

43

libri

however, uncertain.

Destrjiction of Ancient

Caetani-Lovatelli, Attj-averso

tempo

spaccia volgarmente nei

si

34085 Celeri Neronis Augusti

de' famigliari di

monete

non mai un

come

Its original

architettonici.'

prova cogli scavi

'si

sepolcro, ora Chiesa di S. Costanza, che

dalle casse sepolcrali in

Cristiano

II.

by Piranesi {Antichita Romane,

(2)

Varietd di Notizie, 169),

1806 avanti

nel

'

Roman Campagna.

is

Celer,
is

by some

(e.g-.

Lanciani,

one of the architects of

somewhat doubtful

(cf E.

Antico^ I53)-

vigna gia Franz, poi Castelli e Maraini,' almost opposite the

church, were found the lead pipes bearing the inscription C.I.L. xv. 7487

and

in a

head

vineyard near the church

no. 55 of the Fitzwilliam

is

said to

have been found

Museum, which

1826 the

in

Michaelis(/^//t7V/// Marbles,

259) considers to be a forger\'.

Remains of a villa in the Vigna Selvaggini near S. Agnese are referred


to by Tomassetti [op. cit. 26).
On the right of the road, beyond the church, is the Vigna Rufini, now
Solis-Ciogni, in which in 1822 a columbarium was found, which apparently
was

in use shortly after

the death

of Augustus

{C.I.L.

vi.

Other sepulchral inscriptions from the same vineyard are given

8012-8062).
ibid.

8063-

8084, 12 140.
In the

Vigna Crostarosa, on the

left,

Stevenson copied on Jan. i8th,

1895, the following inscriptions which appear to be unpublished

Vat. Lat.

10565 f 570

dIs

MANIBVS

C LICINI I5THYMI
VIXITANNIS XXXXV FECIT

'

LI

GIN A
I

-DON ATA

CONIVG -SANCTISSIMO
''!'!'
PIENI
1

titoletto

marmoreo, buone

lettere

44
'

British School at

Till-:

nella parete avaiiti

ingresso del casino

all'

Rij.me.

frammento

di cornice,'

ENIDE
Here Michelc Stefano de Rossi noticed remains of constructions
tufa, belon<^ing to a fortified

enclosure

'

agger of Servius on the Ouirinal,' while

Fosso

in

the valley below (that of the

Agnese, between the Via Nomentana and the Via Salaria) he

di S.

fragments of archaic

discovered

pottery: and

this

in

valley

Giovanni

Battista de Rossi places the Palus Capreae (or Caprae), considering

Mains

Coemeteriujn
2.

The

740).

contrary

{Bull.

seems

it

learn of
iii.

is

its

in

sqq.

De

to accept

by Livy

Roma,
Campus Martins by

Rossi's view,

i.

which

is

'cum ad exercitum
campo ad Caprae paludem haberet and what
given

(i.

16)

'

from other writers (see Hiilsen

site

to be

Pais, Storia di

cf.

it

connexion with the

in

generally placed in the

difficult

to the indications

recensendum contionem
R.E.

Con. 1883, 244

Palus Capreae

topographers, and

we

ad Caprca mentioned

with the locality

dentical

in

resembling those of the rear of the

in

Pauly-Wissowa,

1545).

The

valley

reference

Nomentana

is

crossed by the xA.qua Virgo, and

made

is

in

1604

'

may

it

be to

this

that

the description of the tombs found near the Via

in

prope arcus Anienis veteris

'

{C.I.L.

vi.

8085-81

16,

Anio Vetus certainly did not pass this way.


The Via Nomentana, from S. Agnese as far as the bridge, followed the
line taken by the modern road.
Tomassetti, it is true, {pp. cit. 29, n. 2) states
that certain tombs found in the Vigna Leopardi, about 500 yards from S.
Agnese on the left, ran obliquely towards the river (the inscriptions are
cf

p.

3454)

for the

given in Bull. Com. 1886, 337 (nos. 1383-6) with them was found the
brickstamp C.I.L. xv. 754a, of the time of Marcus Aurelius (?) but do

not seem to have found their


that the road bifurcated.

way into C.I.L. vi.), and he therefore concludes


Along the modern road, a little further on the

left, opposite the Osteria Mangani, there are remains of a wall in opus
quadratum, belonging either to a tomb or to the crepido of the road itself:
and in the construction cf the fort on the right, just above the railway, the

foundations of a large
burials

fragments

iridescent

pottery

of
'

in

tomb were destroyed, and also remains of earlier


bones mixed with
monochrome Italo-Greek
'

a stratum of vegetable

soil,

below which was a

Classical Topography of the


and

virgin layer, of clay, gravel,

Roman Campagna. II.


On

river sand, full of fossils.

45

the S.E. side

On the left-hand side of


foundations were found {Not. Scav. 1884, 347).
the road, some 200 yards away from it in the valley, is the tomb known as
the Sedia del Diavolo, a very fine specimen of work of the 2nd or 3rd

century A.D. consisting of two chambers one above the other (with an ante-

chamber at the lower level) the lower faced with opus mixtum of not very
good style, the upper with fine brickwork of an ornamental type (Fig. 5).
The lower chamber has three slit windows and several niches on each
and has a ceiling with quadripartite vaulting, while the upper
chamber was roofed with a dome, an interesting stage in the development
of this class of architecture, though the pendentives are not as yet perfectly
side,

spherical (so Rivoira, Origini delf Ardiitettura Lonibarda,


Fig.

52,

Roniane

Ciipole

La Sala

but cf Giovannoni,

reprinted
1904

ArcJiitetti Italiani,

least,

31

and

sqq.

from Annali della

degli

Soc.

Iiigegneri ed

p. 34, n. 3).

This tomb has been used by Tomassetti


branch, at

i.

della villa Liciniana e le

Teniiale

of the Via

{loc. cit.)

Nomentana passed

this

as evidence that one

way, which seems to

from an examination of the ground improbable, but

may have

it

me

been

approached by a deverticulum going towards the Via Salaria, though there


are no actual traces of

In the quarries to the N. are the foundations of

it.

system of reservoirs

a villa, with an extensive

rock

the galleries measure as usual about

and are lined with cement.


made, alluded

to in N'ot.

It

for

water storage, cut

r50 metre high and

in

the

0'85 wide,

was probabl}' here that the discovery was

Scav. 1884, 348, of a wall with a painted dado

and stucco decoration above

the latter in one part represented a portion

of a skeleton.

The Via Nomentana now descends sharply

On

to the valley of the Anio.

modern brickworks, in which were found some tombs


formed with tiles 'a capanna {Not. Scav. 1886, 54). We soon reach the
Ponte Xomentano. But little of the original bridge remains it is generally
believed, like the Ponte Salario, to have been rebuilt by N arses {supra, 16)
the

left

are

'

but

it

has been considerably transformed, even since his day, and

only one arch

in

use

date (Tomassetti,
it Vv'as

op.

it

is

cit.

now has

crowned by a picturesque tower of uncertain


35).

For the damage done

to

it

in

1849, ^v'hen

cut by the French for a length of seven metres, cf Rapport de la

Commission Mixtc,

41.

Immediatel}- after the bridge, a

hill

rises

on the right of the road,


The

46

which

generally

is

32) tells us

(ii.

known

that

'

isolated

hill,

trans

ultra tertium miliarium

Rome

from

miles from the city.

while further E. the Anio

it

the remains of a villa

on the same

on,

is

It is

45.

more than

an
at
3

side, are

metres each way, were found, and

while upon the top of the

which probably supplied the

reservoir

vi.

Close to the road, behind the osteria, in making a

quarry, the foundations of a tomb,

behind

also Dionys.

:' cf.

would be found on the Via Salaria

a stronger position than

distance

this

(p.

Mons Sacer, and very likely rightly. Livy


Anienem amnem est, tria ab urbe milia
318 Miill.) agrees 'Sacer mons appellatur trans
the

as-

'

it

passuum and Festus


Anienem, paulo

British School at Rome.

latter (Not. Scav.

remains of another tomb

a water

hill is

Further

loc. cit.).

which

in concrete,

is

probably that of which the Doric cornice was drawn by various Renaissance

Andreas Coner, while a plan

architects, including
artist

who added

42).

On

the

certain sketches to the

left

\\.

pi.

8a, 75

p. 14,

a large round tomb, with a circular chamber with

is

rectangular niches inside

and further on are traces

Via

delle

in concrete

of another.

The Via Patinaria

II.

unknown

given by the

is

album {Papers,

Vigne Niiove and

Branches).

its

Just after the group of tombs described, a road diverges to the N.,

which
but
for

now known

is

little
it

Via delle Vigne Nuove.

trace of antiquity,

to the

ness of

as the

line.

W.

of Casale

is

This, though

certainly an ancient road

Mangani may be

noticed,

it

retains

the cutting made

and also

its

straight-

Just below the Casale in a quarry are foundations in concrete,

belonging no doubt to some

villa.

Shortly afterwards there branches off from


della Buffalotta,

which

is

also

ancient,

it

now
which we

a road,

and with

called

Via

shall

deal

below.

little

way

further on, to the E. of the road,

which occupies the


in

site

Tomassetti,

correctly

with

committed

op.

the Casale Chiari,

of a large villa with the remains of a large reservoir

opus reticulatiim, with tufa voussoirs

remains of cisterns cut


(cf

is

cit.

in

the rock

43).

in

the arches.

but no brickwork

This has been identified

There are
is

also

now standing

and

no doubt

the villa of Phaon, to which Nero fled and in which he

suicide.

(Suetonius,

Nero,

48,

'

offerente

Phaonte

liberto


Classical Topography of the

Roman Campagxa. -II.

47

suburbanum suum inter Salariam et Nomentanam viam circa quartum


miliarium ') and an interesting confirmation of the identification was
:

made

the discovery

in

1891 of the cinerary urn of Claudia Egloge, in

all

who provided for his burial (Suet. ib. 50,


Alexandria
nutrices cum Acte concubina gentili
et
reliquias Egloge
Domitiorum monumento condiderunt.' See C.I.L. vi. 34916 Bull. Com.
89 1, 227 Not. Scav. 1891, 337 Lanciani, Pagan and Chris tiarc Rome,
We also know the name of the road the Catalogus Impera185 sqg.
torum notes Nero occisus Patinaria via.' The name, but without any
probability the nurse of Nero,

'

topographical details, occurs also

The attempt

Topogr. 382).
della

Via Appia, 40

the Notitia and Curiosum (Richter,

in

of Lugari {Monumenti antichi al iv miglio

sqq?) to transfer

it

to a deverticulum of the

Via Appia

is

unfortunate.

more than a kilometre

little

mere track

on the E. of

the foundations of a

tomb

further on the

modern road becomes

near the Segnale (point 62 on the map), are

it,

(?),

no doubt occupies an ancient

and further on
site

the Torre Redicicoli, which

is

there are various fragments of coloured

we observed a brick with a plain stamp 27 mm. in diameter


Beyond this point the road cannot be traced
(Tomassetti, op. cit. 89).
marbles, and

but

very likely ran on N.E. to join the Via della Buffalotta, to which

it

we may now

return.

To

the E. of this at the second kilometre are traces of

excavations, possibly of those described in Bidl. Inst.


'

a mile from the high road, on a

Nomentano,'

and some coins

having employed 20

men

Casale della Cecchina {infra,


traversed

Beyond

near the

first

1831, 39, as being

turning after the Ponte

which were found some remains of dwelling houses, two

in

statuettes, a lead pipe


after

hill,

they were closed as unsuccessful,

for 2 weeks.
52).

Just

To

by the modern road which seems

this point there are

the N.E. again

beyond

there

of

to be

no traces of antiquity

for

is

ancient

some

is

the

cutting
origin.

distance.

At

point 49 a road diverges to the N.E., which leads to the Casale Torre S.

The main road

Giovanni {infra,

50).

and the Casale

Buffalotta.

bridge which

passes E. of the Casale Belladonna

There are many pavingstones under the

crosses the stream

(Fosso Buffalotta,

or,

higher up, delle

Spallette di S. Margherita), and the road continues on the further side of


it, still

in

Buffalotta

a straight line (due N.) until

bricks, the

it

passes,

on the

left,

the Chiesuola

tomb of ornamental brickwork, the front being of yellow


sides of red (compare the tomb beyond Casale dei Pazzi

The British School at Rome.

48
infra,

53).

Soon

after this

it

appears to divide

branches,

three

into

two of which turn

N.VV. to cross the Fosso Formicoia, while the third

keeps straight on.

All the three must have fallen into the ancient road

from Malpasso to Mentana

{s7ipra,

The

24).

which run N.W. leaves the remains of a

on the

villa

N.W.
the N.W.

of another brick tomb, which faces

of the two branches

first

and passes

S.

just

S.W.

the inner chamber measures

of it are mediaeval, though


by 2'8o metres the ruins to
they no doubt occupy an ancient site> Brick d(^bris is to be found all over
There is a circular chamber cut in the rock on the edge of
the plateau.

4-50

the stream,

into

which run three water channels

plastered niche with traces of painting (rosettes,

Brit,

may

Close by are caves, which

and Ainer. Arch.

Soc.

ii.

the front of

etc.),

so that

may have

be pre-Roman tombs {Joiirnal of

'

nella tenuta (della

Marcigliana) lungo I'andamento della Salaria antica, presso

1825 e 1826' (Nibby,

has a

206).

Important excavations were made by Castellani

I'anno

it

it

a kind of nymphaeum,

been a fountain, the front of which was ornamented


in fact.

op.

cit.

The

303).

ii.

site

la

Buffalotta

should probably

be sought at or near these ruins, which are not far from the N. boundary of
the Tenuta Buffalotta, according to Cingolani's map.
the site of the discoveries vague'y as
the passage in

Nibby makes

it

at

'

Fidenae

clear that

excavations the finding of Kaibel, I.G.I.


Caecilia Philippa, which
(the

tombstone of

Nibby enumerates

Atticilla),

'

we have

Amati

alludes to

but a comparison with


to attribute to these

1346 (the tombstone of Aelia


as a Latin inscription

!),
1440
and perhaps some more Greek inscriptions

(Dessau, C.I.L. xiv. 4065, speaks of 'several,' though Nibby mentions no


others, except that of

Naevia Spendusa, which

or Latin), though the lack


it

of a

'

4056,

dedication

fidenate riaperto

mi dice

to
(Sig.

either

recensus locorum recentiorum

impossible to ascertain the truth;

xiv.

may have been

also (in

Hercules

all

Victor,

Castellani)

Greek

makes

probability) of C.I.L.

found

quadrone

in

'

'

di

dallo

scavo

marmo,

in

muri di stagno e tubi per I'acqua,


mezzo ad una stanza che per avere
bagno'
(Amati,
Vat.
un
Lat.
giudica
it may be noticed that
9735, f. 58)
Nibby speaks of avanzi di bagno del tempo degli Antonini,' of the
i

'

weight bearing the inscription C.I.L.

xiv. 4124,

(dated A.D. 47), probably

of the Latin sepulchral inscriptions C.I.L. xiv. 4065 {supra, 24) 4068, 4069
and certainly of the brickstamps C.I.L. xv. 931b (period of Hadrian) 21 11
^corrupt)

and the lead pipe inscribed

MAECIL

(//^/V/.

7711) which occur

Roman Campagna. II.

Classical Topography of the


on the same page

ot

Amati's notes as

Nibby

I.G.I. 1346.^

49

also mentions

the discovery of fragments of basreliefs and decorations in terracotta, four

bronze feet belonging to a bed

in

the form of lions' claws and decorated with

which were found within a

figures of victory,

jar,

and a large rhyton of

marble, adorned with vine leaves and ivy in relief; and also of brickstamps

One

bearing the date 123 A.D.

is

alia Belladonna,' in

date {C.I.L.'s.w 487,

7 'ex

pipe

'

which brickstamps of

praedis luli Eutacti Salarese

this

very

and the lead

')

7473 which also bears lulius Eutactus' name were found, is not
to be attributed to the same locality, though Belladonna is a

ibid.

in reality
little

c,

wonder whether the grande

inclined to

scavo (fidenate) detto

way

The

S.E. of Buffalotta, and part of a different property.^

portion

of Amati's notes from which these details are taken belongs to the year
1826 (Lanciani, Silloge acqiuu-ia, no. 433).
at the site

1833 further excavations

In

mentioned above led to the discovery of a large black and white

mosaic pavement representing Tritons and Nereids, and of fragments of


statuary (Nibby,
2

loc.

cit.

Diss. Accad. Pont. Arch.

Diario di Roma, 6 Aprile 1833, no.

to a plan of these ruins

made

the Archivio di Stato, which

them

to the E. of

it

said, the third

28

v.

Tomassetti

Bull. Inst.

{op. cit.

About

now

in

a kilometre

apparently a tumulus, indicated by a round mark on


passes N.E. of the ruins, while, as has

keeps straight on, and then turns to the N.W.

Here

joins the road already alluded to {supra, 24), of the further course of

which towards
It

Nomentum we may

Fosso Ormeto, and then,

made

briefly

speak now.

somewhat tortuous line, the country being broken up by


and after a time follows the deep valley of a tributary of the

takes a

deep ravines,

for

{op. cit.

it

iii.

for

a while, this stream

are the only evidence of

634) says that

it

Fosso Ormeto.

its

itself.

it

The

in his

map

Before reaching this point,

it

many

little

cither.

way

S. of the

Fosso Bettina (though his

its

as traceable as far as the

passes on the E. and

3 Gell {op. cit.


45 and map) indicates two other tumuli, one some way
Colomba, near the source of the Fosso Bettina, the other to the

examined

Nibby

remains of

^
Whether a copy of C.I.L. xv. 7626 was also found here is doubtful: Amati
mistaken in attributing it to Fidenae a's well as to Ficulea {infra, 59).
- In Eph. Epiqy. vii. 127 1, the locality is vaguely given as Fidenae.

apparently a

cuttings

antiquity at present, though

preserved in his day

ancient pavement, and indicates

.S.

1834,

90) refers

the time of Alexander VII.

in

have not yet consulted.

The second branch road

the map.^

been

is

28).

map

is

may have been

to the E. of the

S.

W.

Casale

of S. Colomba, and

not very clear).

have not

The

50

British School at Rome.

some unimportant remains of villas, which will be found indicated on


After it, as far as Mentana {infm, 70) the modern path certainly

the map.

presents no traces of antiquity.

We

must now return

to the

Via

definite traces of antiquity, but

is

Tor

di

Giovanni.

S.

This presents no

very probably ancient, to judge by the

existence of a i^w pavingstones at the fountain W.N.VV. of the Casale

Tor

S.

Giovanni, and of a cutting to the N.W., by which

to the plateau.

ruins

in

it

would ascend

Close to the 6th kilometre of the road are unimportant

brickwork, and 500 yards S. of the casale, on the E. of the

probable line of the ancient road, are two round shafts cut in the rock,
which may have communicated with cisterns. The casale seems to occupy

an ancient

site

immediately to the E. of

are two long narrow water

it

one another.

reservoirs at right angles to

About

a kilometre

N.N.W. of

the casale are the remains of another villa in the banks of a stream, to

which the road probably

led.
Whether it went further, I do not know
have joined the others of which we have just spoken at
point 75 on the map.
Some way to the E. was found a white marble sepulchral cippus, which

but

is

it

now

may

well

at the casale

it

bears the following inscription

D
M
ANNIAE TYCHE

M ANNIVS

urceus

patera

IVVENALIS
CONIVGI B M F

The letters are 4 cm. in height, and the cippus itself measures 51 cm.
width by 49 cm. in height. The date, from the form of the G, is probably
the 2nd century A.D. (see Papers, i. 248).
in

In this district,

we may say between Tor

S.

to

be sought the

is

frequently mentioned in the early history of

Wissowa, R.E.

site

iv.

Giovanni and the Tiber,

of Crustumerium,^ though no remains of

1727)

passuum

and according

Rome

to Pliny

exist.

it

is

It

(Hiilsen in Pauly-

{H.N.

iii.

53

'
:

Tiberis

Veientem agrum a Crustumino, dein


Fidenatem Latinumque a Vaticano dirimens '), Dionysius (ii. 53, a^^ofiVT]<i yap ei? rrjv ^(Ofxr^v dyopd^ iv aKd(f)ai<; 7roTa/u,r)yol<i,7)u K-povarov/jLeplvoo
citra

xvi

milia

'

urbis

There are various forms of the name.

Roman Campagna. II.

Classical Topography of the

Td<i

Kara

VTTO Xifiov 'Voifiacoi^ direaTetXav, ooadfjievot

TTie^ofj^ivoi'i

^iSrivaloi

ol

(TKd(f)a<;

speaks of the Allia as descending from the Crustumini montes,


also

have

42,

37, cf.

'

hereabouts

lain

and though

appeared (the city was

place

the

conquered

finally

500

in

time correctly

the

name seems

names

'

471

B.C.),

cum

agro Crustumino, videre

in

ii.

and Pliny

the lost cities of Latium {H.N.

68),,

iii.

and

Cf. Varro, R.R,

produced, remained famous.

it

ad viam Salariam,

coniunctos aggeres
It

in

entirely dis-

according to Liv.

to have clung to the district, the fertility of which,

especially the pears which


14,

among

it

had

itself
B.C.,

the tribus Crustumina being formed probably

this

i.

v.

ab Ereto (Rornani) per silentium noctis profugi propius urbem


Fidenas Crustumeriamque loco edito castra communierant ') it must

iii.

inter

19,

evrt

7rXrido<i

and Livy (who

cijopav Ziripiraaav k.t.X.)

rrjv

51

aliquot

locis

licet

ne flumen agris noceret.'

fossis,

was apparently on the edge of the Sabine territory it is mentioned,,


among the Sabine cities in the story of the
;

with Caenina and Antemnae,

among

rape of the Sabine women, but


iii.

and the

49,

latter tells

greater antiquity than

us

(ii.

Rome.

the Prisci Latini in Liv.

36) that

140)

and Nibby

Giovanni, or
casale

Father

is

map

tombs.

it

cit.

is

i.

very likely correct, as

523) that

the

The view

it

Tor

site

to be sought at

is

S.

Chaupy

of

{op.

Tor S.

Giovanni, just N. of the

would be eminently

of the Brit, and

far

site

its

Am.

Arch. Sac.

cit.)

suitable.
inclines,

hesitation, to place the arx at the ruins S. of point 75

on

{supra, 48) owing to the presence of what he believes to be early


Either view would agree with Livy's description of the position of

the Allia, which

and

was an Alban colony of

it

n. 2, 26).

the Macchia di

P. P. M.d.cV^y {Journal

but with some


the

{op.

better, in

Dionys.

38,

Various erroneous opinions as to

have already been dealt with {supra, 24


cit. iii.

i.

is

an important element

in

the determination of the

site,

impossible in the present state of our knowledge to be more

exact.

From the Ponte Nomentano to the Ruderi del Coazzo

III.

{from

We

now

the

Third

return to the Via

bridge over the Anio.

The

to

the Fifth mile).

Nomentana, which we

cutting through the

descends to the stream before the

fifth

kilometre,

is

beyond the
by which the road

left just

hill,

probably of ancient

origin.

E 2

The British School at

52

Unimportant remains
on the

visible
fifth
vi.

left,

1427 1, C. Calvisidius

Ai

i.

c.

46, has

this point

of

tombs, no doubt

is
f.

a sepulchralcippus of tufa
Ser.

in fro. ped. xiix.

or

still

xii.

in situ {C.I.L.

we read

as

it

where

an ancient road seems to diverge 30'

S. of E.

paving-

anti-

its

can be traced to a point just S.W. of the Torre di Aguzzano,

To

appears to stop.

it

it

xiii.).

stones and a cutting through the tufa are evidences in favour of

quity

are

both before, and after the bridge, and just before the

kilometre stone there

Nibby, Schede,

opus rcticulatum

in

Romp:.

remains of a

villa,

the S.E.

a tomb,

is

and further on the

but the road cannot be traced further.

E. from the Torre di

Aguzzano

to join

The

track going

the road described infra^ 99,

is

of

purely modern origin.

To

may

the

left

a track goes off N. to the Casale della Cecchina, which

be of ancient origin, though Nibby {Schede,

was unable to detect


any traces there are many paving-stones at the Casale, and fragments of
columns and architectural members, as though there had been some
ancient villa here the site is a fine one, commanding a good view (Nibby,
cit.)

Analisi,

i.

449).

There are traces of walling

at the Casale dei Pazzi

the road: and in Bull. Inst. 1831, 39,

we

on both sides of

are told of excavations opposite

the Casale, not far from the road, in which

finely stuccoed walls

were

discovered, going to a considerable depth, and two terracotta urns: while

work quite

close to the road brought to light a building of

travertine, with a semi-colossal statue of


in

the

Museo

inscriptions.

Torlonia, no.

Visconti's catalogue) and

5 in

Among them was

(whether sepulchral or not

is

no doubt

sigg.

Inglesi

alia

C.I.L.

vi.

uncertain, as the end

of A. lunius Pastor, consul ordinarius

blocks of

an emperor (apparently that now

is

some

sepulchral

1435, an inscription

wanting)

in

honour

163 A.D., found 'alio scavo dei

in

Cecchina Via Nomentana.'

The road descends again

through a cutting of ancient origin, which has recently been deepened


(two ancient drains cut

in

the rock having been thus exposed), to a bridge

over the Fosso della Cecchina,

in

which there were some traces of ancient

paving, though the bridge itself

is

modern

road, however, could be seen in the cutting

an actual section of the ancient

beyond

it.

(Nibby, Schede,

cit.)

Near the top of the hill a track goes off S.S.E. to the Casale
di Aguzzano, which occupies an ancient site
there are foundations of opus
quadratum under it, and the circular fowlhouse near it rests upon a round
;

Classical Topography of the Ro^L\N Campagna.


brick building, while close
also

by

two travertine sarcophagi

It is to

were discovered the two inscriptions

further along, on the right,

Sedia del Diavolo, and

it

built of red

the latter at the sides.

front,

in

is

tomb known

the brick

is

della Cecchina, or di Spuntapiedi

to the

former

is

similar in construc-

and yellow

details are given in Schede,

The

i.

op. cit.

i.

47).

dome

31, Fig. 51).

windows, between which

The

cutting

made

is

is

now

(not

fact,

cit.

further

in

painted

similar to that of the Sedia del

The

facade towards the road has

a festoon in

relief,

cut in the brick.

for the old road, or for the extraction of its materials

Nibby

can be seen on the S.E. edge of the modern road.


observes this

loc.

Both retain traces of decoration

construction of the

Diavolo (Rivoira,
slit

bricks, the

The lower chamber

while the upper chamber had four niches also {Aiialisi,

two

as the

had four niches and was reached by a staircase on the outside,

accessible)

stucco.

Aguzzano that

infra, 100.

little

Torraccio
tion

the Tenuta di

53

II.

There are

a wall in opus reticulatum.

is

here.

the tufa quarry belongs in which

mentioned

and notices another tomb

of which no traces are

now

{Schede,

cit?)

of opus quadratiivi on the

left,

and, about a quarter of a mile beyond the

left,

modern

Here he
saw clear traces, he says, of an ancient road crossing the Via Nomentana,
both on the right and the left, which I have not been able to detect and
a well-preserved piece of

first,

pavement

the

in

road.

they are not indicated in his map.

The excavations

described in Bull. Inst.

183

1,

39, as a mile

beyond

and beyond the tomb known as Spuntapiedi, on the


right of the road, led to the discovery of some sepulchral chambers two
the first, four small ones
the second,
of them contained marble sarcophagi
and
two
Roman
on
a
column,
soldiers at
Victory
one,
with
a
large
a very
Casale dei

Pazzi,

each angle.
{Aureliiis
'

It

may have

been here that the lead pipe C.I.L. xv. 7600a

Agathangelus fecit) was discovered

at the sixth mile of the Via

1830'

an

indication

Nomentana

we

in the

are told that

it

was found

tenuta della Cecchina in

which agrees well enough with

this site.

little

further on, on the right, are the Ruderi del Coazzo, of which everything stand-

ing

is

40, n.

mediaeval, though the site


i).

To

the

W.

of

is

probably ancient (Tomassetti,

them an ancient road diverges

known as the Strada Vecchia

di

(now

Palombara), which will require a section

to itself: while another diverges S. to the


S. Basilio {infra, 99).

op. cit.

to the right

Via Tiburtina past the Casale


The

54

III. The

British School at Rome.

Strada Vecchia

'

di

Palombara.'

point where this road leaves the Via

At the
made for it

Nomentana

the cutting

and several paving-stones may be seen a little


while, after point 59 on the map, the cuttings, which run just
further on
to the N. of the modern track, are conspicuous, and there is pavement
preserved in them. To the W. of the road are two water reservoirs and
is

clearly traceable,

upon an ancient
In the tenuta, but probably on the E. side of the road which
building.
passes the Casale on the E. (which is quite modern) in the quarto Valle

other

ruins

while the Casale delle Vittorie

made

Valente, excavations were


17),

in 1856 (cf Giorn. Arcad. cxliv. (1856)


were found remains of ancient buildings

of which

the course

in

itself rests

of a good period, including a fine doorway with a threshold of travertine,

and a

fluted

column of

fragments of statues and bas-

of animals which served as fountain jets

sepulchral inscription C.I.L.

4017 (=

on each side

tufa

including heads

reliefs,

vi.

The

XV. 7460, 7534a).

the

15947, and the lead pipes C.I.L. xiv. 4016,

bears the

first

name

of L. Funisulanus

Vettonianus, the successor of Frontinus as curator aqiiarum

in 106.

From the building to which it belonged, and of which he was the


owner, may also have come the inscription C.I.L. vi. 29703, which records
the gift by certain Funisulani, who were Augustales, to their fellow-citizens
in

some

Italian

town (not

Rome

itself)

of a set of weights and measures

and the decoration by them of an exedra. This


inscription was found not far from the fine statue of Antinous described in

{pondera

et mensiirae),

Bull. Coin. 1886, 209,

Banca Nazionale

in

and

tav.

vii.,

the course of excavations for the

in

Rome,^ but the

inscription, as will

contents, obviously does not belong to

stand in

and

it

its

Rome

itself:

be clear from

upon a stratum of rubbish 6

original position, but

feet deep,

bore traces of having been under water for a considerable time.

recommend

it

{Bull.

it

and the

Q. Servilius Pudens,

Sei'vili

who appears

The

statue

is

Pudentis

as an

139 {C.I.L. XV. 346, 349, 350, 1429


1

in the

and the sug-

inscription

Com. 1886,

pipes bears the inscription

It

Middle Ages
come from this villa has much to
The second of the two lead
189 sqq.).

had evidently been transported thither


gestion that both

its

nor did the Antinous

Ti.

Claudius Phoenix

owner of brickworks

1440),

in

fee.

123

must have been almost the

preserved in the courtyard of the bank

itself.

a
Classical Topography of the

Roman Campagna. II.

immediate successor of L. Funisulanus Vettonianus


the

in the

55

ownership of

villa.

Tomassetti

mentions other excavations made here under

{op. cit. 46, n. 3)

the Pontifical Government by Rocchi, the results of which are unknown.

To

cutting through the

hill,

14th kilometre of the

On

ii.

It

307).

ately to the E. of
is

uncertain

the ancient road

is

is

and, after another

villa,

joined by the modern, near the

across the stream,

hill

occupies, in

all

is

Marco

the large Casale di

1678

Nibby,

probability, an ancient site:

immedi-

Cesi (for to that family

or Castel

Analisi,

are following

latter.

the right, on a

Simone

which

we

the S. of the road

it

belonged

until

are vaulted substructures in concrete, the nature of

it

while at the Casale

Bull. Inst. 1833, 100) with a

a sarcophagus (described in

itself is

group of the Three Graces

two other

front under a large niche, and

figures

in the centre

on each side

of the

smaller

in

niches.^

mile to the N.E.

is

the Casale di

the

German

point

volume of Miscellanea

Institute) places

but his reputation

is

not a good one {C.I.L.

traces

of

infra,

104),

naumachiae (he

sarcophagi,

aqueducts,

and

roads,

with their capitals, and

He

in the

in

He

refers

inscriptions,'

brickstamps and inscriptions on lead pipes


tenant of Marco Simone: and

ix. p. 388).

He

this
calls

Via Ficulensis,' and apparently saw the

we have spoken.

course of which

its

temples,

baths,

'

(J 168) in the library of

Ficana (which he confuses with Ficulea) at

the Strada Vecchia di Palombara

'

there

Martelli {Ubicazione di Ficana (1828), 3

are no traces of antiquity.


dissertation preserved in a

Marco Simone Vecchio, where

mentions,
to the

that

besides

Laghetto

some

he copied

the house of Signor Caretti,

macchia he saw four Doric columns

stream the pavement of an ancient road.

in the

also notices the existence of sarcophagi in the garden of Castel Cesi,

and the discovery of coins, fragments of statues and a gold bracelet.


He concludes by saying that the two subterranean temples which can
be reached by a narrow, half-concealed passage under Marco Simone
'

Vecchio

'

are

of considerable

importance

probability, merely caves in the tufa.

Canina

these

are,

however,

in

states {Btill. Inst. 183

that excavations were undertaken in the Tenuta of

1,

all

29)

Marco Simone (which

1 The lemains further to the S.E. will be described infra, 104 scjtj., in connexion with the Strada
Vecchia di Montecelio and so also the inscriptions C.I.L. xiv. 3993-5.
Other sepulchral inscriptions found in the tenuta are given ibid. 3996-9, and two lead pipes, 4000, 4000a ( = xv. 7621, 7709).

The

56

British School at Rome.

belonged to the Borghese) not

far

from Mentana, resulting

of baths with black and white mosaic pavements, of

in the

discovery

importance, and

little

of other objects of no particular value.

we

Ficulea, as

shall see,

was situated elsewhere: but Corniculum should

perhaps be sought hereabouts, on the authority of Dionysius,


that the Aborigines founded

i.

who

i6,

says

TeWrjveh (see infra, 62, n. 2)


Kcu ^tKoXveovi Toi)? 7rpo<i Tol^ KaXov/u.ei'OL'i KopvtKXoa opeat koI Ti^ovprivovi;,
from which it would appear that it must lie between Ficulea and Tibur.
(So Bormann, Altldt. CJwrogr. 255, who puts it where Xibby puts Caenina

{infra, 65),

tana

it

though

his

in

'

AvTefjbvdra<i kuI

map

he marks

on the

it

of the Via

left

however, to be remem.bered that Bormann, though a good

is,

topographer, was writing without ever having seen the

v) and

iv,

which

in

Hiilsen in Pauly-Wissowa, R.E.

it is

iv.

1604).

Campagna (preface,
The other passages

mentioned do not give us any information as

so the legend tells us, conquered by Tarquinius Priscus


it is

only mentioned casually by Florus,

dum

terrori fuerunt

catalogue of the

Abeken
54)

S.

opinion
it

'

Angelo

Vet. Lat.

i.

11,6 (Cora

cities

{infra,

at Montecelio

it

{Analisi,

is

now

and

366)

{op. cit.

the church called

Molette.

was thinking
Torre Vergata is a

Campagna Romana i^Wihy.Analisi,

in the

iii.

250),

and the

cannot place.

water channel cut


of the Fosso del

in

two more

Roman

the rock, of

Capo

(less correctly

villas

date.

and

in

the Tenuta del-

to the N. again

The remains

to the

Cupo, on the large scale map),

is

N.W.
in

the

traces

of

del Pilo Rotto, are described irfra, 106.

the

W.

of

the

which

road,

presents

antiquity, except that paving-stones are used


op. cit.

in Pliny's

that he

Further to the N.E., on the Monte Prato Rotondo,

On

ii.

181), Gell

{infra,

One would imagine

rinviolatella, are the remains of

Tenuta

days

Torre Vergata, near the Fosso Magliano, two miles

from the Montes Corniculani.'

was,

it

in later

both views being inspired by Kircher's

186),

of a site to the E. of the Osteria delle

church

its site

222) as to the Montes Corniculani, though he himself puts

at the

common name

to

but

quis credat et Algi-

Nibby

of Latium.

not far from Eretum (Monte Rotondo), where

Marchitella,

Satricum atque Corniculum provinciae), and

lost

{Mittelitalien, 7?>) ^ut

at

Nomen-

125, says that

remains of three
delle Molette,

is

no

actual

as kerb-stones (VVestphal,

he saw frequent remains of ancient paving), are the

villas,

while

to

a water reservoir.

the

E.,

almost opposite the

Osteria

Roman Campagna. II.

Classical Topography of the

From the Osteria a path diverges


Nomentana near Mentana, which, in all

N.W., joining the Via

the

to

57

probability, follows

the line of

an ancient road from Nomentum to Tibur, indicated on the Tabula


continuing past point 105 on the map, in
Peutingerana {infra, 68)
;

more or less along the line of the path, it would


an
fall into the path marked Via di Montecelio on Map ii.,^ and arrive at
Tibur in very little more than the nine miles given by the Tabula.
direction,

easterly

Dessau

wrongly gives the distance as eight miles,

{C.I.L. xiv. p. 440, n. i)

and remarks that

The

much

it is

less

than the truth.

and the road from Lago dei


and this is the
Montecelio presents no traces of antiquity

section between Osteria delle Molette

Tartari to

my

cause of

having omitted to continue the dotted

along

line

course.

its

Perhaps, too, the ancient road did not run quite straight, but ran
to the

S.,

Capo

del

towards point 65, and then followed the N. bank of the Fosse
If so, it would join the line of the Via di
{infra, 107).

Montecelio just N. of point 102 on the

little

is

ii.

is

the

and near

it

are

reservoir,

and two mediaeval towers.

Further on, to the

the Casale di Greppe, with mediaeval ruins near

is

Mentana

To

Cassio's Meviorie di S. Silvia, 183.

there are unimportant ruins.

W.

diverges

to

Martelli

{loc. cit.)

the E. of the

little

and Westphal

similar find

beyond

this

{loc. cit.)

is

to S. Angelo,
rests

is

known

visible.

the

at

reservoir of

as

have inadvertently been omitted from both


a

hill

to the

W.

my

Le Pezze

point where a

name of

opus reticulatum.
{infra,

187),

and

The former

maps.

of the road, to the E. of the Valle Oscura, are

the remains of extensive buildings, recently rendered

more

removal of the macchia and the spread of cultivation.


^

road

line [infra,

a building bearing the

upon a water

the N.E. are the ruins

recorded in

another

point

to the N.E. again the large circular reservoir described ibid.

On

told at

notice traces of the ancient

Molino del Moro, which


to

was

the S.E. of Osteria Nuova, too,

Nuova they are no longer


road we are following, just

modern road ascends


little

Mentana, which probably follows an ancient

road above the Osteria

To

preserved, in powder.

still

it.

1898, granaries had been discovered underground

that here, in

with the corn,

Map

of

on the E. of the road,

upon an ancient

built

traces of other buildings,

70).

W. edge

after the Osteria delle Molette,

Casale Pichini, which

W.,

first

I refer to

the path

coming N.W. from

Tivoli.

visible

by the

Their existence

is


The

58

British School at Rome.

noticed by Guattani {Mon. Sabini,

(remarking that further on

which

did not see

who

353),

them the

calls

grotte belle

the forest he found traces of ancient roads

in

and

ii.

of water channels)

There are two water

and Gori

{op. cit.

67)

above ground, one

reservoirs, both

mentions them.
measuring lO'iS by 5-94 metres, the other 775 metres square; Guattani
There are also traces of substructures and large
gives plans of both.
quantities of brick and other debris.

To

N.W.

the

another reservoir.

is

E. of the road at point 144 are the remains of the platform of a


to the E., on the

hill,

a circular reservoir

Giachetti, are the remains of a large reservoir with

many fragments

villa,

and

while further N., on the Colle

of brick from the villa which

it

bearing a fragment of a rectangular stamp

two chambers, and

supplied

not as yet identified.

among them one


which

tq

have

turns at right angles, and runs eastwards to Palombara

Our road soon

W.

the track going off

likely follow an ancient line {infra, 71),

Monte Rotondo may very


and the same ^ is true of that

past Castel Chiodato

to

running N. to Monte Venere {infra, 83) and of that which runs

S.

from

the Ponte Levatore {infra, 180).

To

the E. of this last point there

on the N.

{among

and some way

to the

is

a large villa above the

N. of

traces of antiquity

With Palombara

IV.

itself

we

shall deal further

if

its

course are

they are of ancient origin.

on

{infra,

76

sqg.).

the Fifth to the Fourteenth mile).

After this long digression,

presents no definite

From the Ruderi del Coazzo to Mentana


{from

beyond the Ruderi

kilometre.

The road

cuttings in the last portion of

the

{infra, 72).

deep, but have certainly been enlarged,

just

modern road

remains of another

are the

the ruins of which were the torsi of two small male statues), and,

further on again, of a church

left

it

Before the latter

At Castel Chiodato the

(no doubt, as so often, a

inscription

Roman

we
del
is

return to the Via

Nomentana, which we

Coazzo, and not far from


reached, the

C.I.L. xiv. 3930/1

modern road

the eighth

crosses over,

was seen upon the holy-water basin


but it is no longer in

cinerary urn converted to this use)

existence.
'^

Westphal

{op. cit.

125) notes that after the so-called Molino del

Avanting in any of these roads.

Moro

traces of antiquity are

Classical Topography of the

Roman Campagna. II.

59

There are various remains on the


tombs those at the
left of the road, of no great importance of villas or
point marked Ficulea on the Staff Map belong to the former.
leaving the ancient road on the

left.

there is a
Casale Coazzo apparently occupies an ancient site
etc.. are to
columns,
of
wall indeed in the floor of the yard,i and fragments
be seen also many paving-stones, which probably do not come from the

The

Via Nomentana, the pavement of which, four metres wide,

some

Indeed,

distance.

road

is

(the exact spot


C.I.L.

in Bull. Inst. 1854, 17,

mentioned, and excavations

vi.

is

in

intact for

is

the existence of an ancient

the tenuta in the Quarto del Casale

uncertain) are described

the sepulchral inscriptions

2164, 2165, in honour of two brothers,

Manius Valerius Satur-

ninus and Manius Valerius Bassus, both haruspices and both tribunes of
the 3rd legion (Cyrenaica), and four fine mosaic pavements were found in
also the brickstamp C.I.L. xv. 1008 (after 108 A.D.).
the course of them
;

To

the N. of the Casale

To

is

the

site

of another

villa.

the N. again, on the further side of a deep valley,

Cesarina.

It

does not

itself

is

the Casale della

of necessity occupy an ancient site

but about

half a mile to the N.E. excavations were made by Vescovali in the winter
been utterly
-of 1824, and in the ruins of a villa which seemed to have
marble, one
in
heads
several
lion
and
destroyed there were found a

representing Lucilla, the wife of Lucius Verus, the sepulchral inscriptions


C.I.L. xiv. 401 1, 4033. and a fragment, preserved only in Schede cit.
'^

AVLV
ANNOR
D
MOSCIV/
VIII

LONGI
In Schede,

iii.

36, the last line is

given as LONGV.

Here was

also found

the brickstamp C.I.L. xv. 509 (133 A.D.) and a lead pipe with the inscription C.I.L. xiv. 401 8

The important
1

7626.

inscription

C/.L. xiv. 4012 seems to have been found

Here was probably found the inscription C.I.L. xiv. 4005, the provenance of which is quite
selciato or road pavement.
it was used in a
177, he states that it was used
So Nibby in Aiialisi, ii. 50, and Schede, iii. 36; in Schede,

uncertain, as
-

= XV.

as a step at the Casale.

'

'

i.

The British School at Rome.

6o

about half a mile further N.E., and, apparently, from what Nibby says, not
in situ, but in the ruins of another villa which I have not visited.^
Ibid.

4019 (the epistyle of a tomb) was discovered under similar circumstances


in

The

use as a threshold.

thus:

M. Consius, M.

'

mea

voluntate

1.

fact

is

unfortunate, as C.I.L. xiv. 4012

Cerinthus, accensus velatus, immunis

impensa mea clivom

et

stravi, lapide

cum

runs

sim,

ex

ab imo susum longum

cum marginibus pedes viiii (fit quod stravi milia pedum


[square feet] mmmlx)
iterum- eundem clivom ab imo levavi et clivom
medium fregi et depressi impensa mea, regione Ficulensi pago Ulmano et
Transulmano Peleciano usque ad Martis et ultra.' The topographical
pedes cccxl, latum

importance of the inscription would have been great


covered in

situ.

says that

was found

gran

it

parte,'

That

'

in piedi

Amati

had been

if it

ancora in

sulla via di cui tratta, visibile

{Bidl. Inst.

dis-

{Giorn. Arcad. xxxli. (1826) 98)

1831,

126) merely says

'

esaminate

varie collinette intorno, colle valli intermedie, osservai-

le

may be worth

It

true that

is

though Fea

diligentemente

It

while to give the original text of the two accounts, which differ slightly in

Nel Novembre dell' anno 1824 furono intrapresi scavi


una fimbria di colle parallela a quella nella
quale sorge il casale.
Essi furono continuati nei mesi seguenti anche di la di quella punta, e
dappertutto vi furono trovati indizi ed avanzi di villette che insieme doveano formare uno o piu paghi
siccome dalla iscrizione che piu sotto riporto {C.I.L. xiv. 4012) puo dedursi.
II fiumicello che
scorre sotto la Cesarina forse fu detto Ulmano.
Deviando dalla via Nomentana poco oltre il
Xorraccio della Cecchina al V. m(iglio) a sinistra si scende all' Ulmano e passatolo sopra ponte si
details.

in Schede,

36 runs thus

iii.

nel tenimento della Cesarina poco oltre

il

'

casale in

sale al casale della Cesarina che e circa

i
m. dopo il diverticolo.
Ivi trovasi impiegato come
gradino un masso quadrilungo di travertino colla iscrizione seguente {C.I.L. xiv. 4011).
Oggi
questo masso e in Roma.
(II casale fu degli Sforza e n'e prova I'arme rapp(resentante) un' orsa

legato ad una colonna.

Nello scavo sulla fimbria opposta a questo casale furono trovati pavimenti di camere da bagno,
{C.I.L. xiv. 4033 and the fragment given above)
leggesi in una
figlina ivi rinvenuta' C.I.L. xv. 509. 2. (a.d. 133) 508a, which I found there belongs to the same
'

e queste iscrizioni sepolcrali

'

'

and has practically the same legend, Hibero et Sisenna cos. ex. pr. Ulp(i) Ulpian(i)
Ivi pure fu trovato un condotto colla epigrafe C.I.L. xiv. 4018 sovente ripetuta.
A
poca distanza da questo scavo, forse un mezzo miglio piii oltre, fra i ruderi di camere ben decorate
di marmi fini, porfido, serpentino etc. frammenti di colonne si trovo la lapide seguente {C.I.L. xiv.
4012)
che sembra essere stata inserita in un muro.' The account in Analisi, ii. 50 is similar.
On the copy is the note trovata alia Cesarina piu di \ miglio a nord del casale.'
The account in Schede, i. 117 says II casale e di costruzione per quanto apparisce intieramente
moderna vi si trovano pero d' intorno sparsi massi di travertino un tempo fu de' Colonna come si
vede da un arma rovesciata non antichissima che ha una colonna sormontata da un aquila a cui
e incatenato un orso
per uno scalino e impiegato un gran travertino {C.I.L. xiv. 4011).
Un buon quarto di miglio a sett, del casale sono stati fatti nell' inverno dell' anno 1824 scavi, e
si sono trovate camere appartenente ad una villa sontuosa del primo periodo del secondo secolo,
con pavim. di marmo ma che sembrava aver sofferto I'ultima distruzione ivi si sono scoperte (un
leone add.) parecchie teste una delle quali di Lucilla moglie di Lucio vero, molti frammenti di
giallc, rosso, alabastro, africano, verde e serpentino, e due iscrizioni
(given above).
year,

'

Sal(arese).'

'

'

'

'

'

Classical Topography of the


parte

fabbrica

di

ancora

selciata

quella

di

delle rovine

the two points of which

buon

in

Nibby

essere

costruzione

ordinaria

di

Roman Campagna. II.

Nel basso

speaks).

due

in

(one

6i

colline,

would suppose,

ancora un ruscello

vi e

d'acqua buona, ove trovai avanzi di fabbrica nobile, forse per bagno e
pavimenti ad uso romano con lastre di porfido rosso e marmi colorati.'
(This last site must be on the W. bank of the Fosso della Cesarina, at a
point where there

from the

hill,

a channel cut in the rock, drawing a supply of water

is

close to

Guattani {Mon.

which are concrete foundations.)

Sabini, i. 229) and Ratti {Diss. Accad. Pont. iv. 257 sqq>) also mention these
excavations, recording the discovery of busts of Antoninus Pius and lulia
(the latter with triple drop earrings

Maesa

Guattani also speaks of remains of the road

head of Cicero.
dalla

collina

giacque

ove

attraversata la valle al

qua

di lava

dimensione

mentioned
vaulting

'

but

ma

basaltina

6^^})

a cassettoni,'

He

{i.e.

occupied

that

solo ad onta dell'

ne resta

alio scoperto

in that

case

it

has

scendendo

by the
erba

casale),

riconosce

si

qualche straccio ancora

(The reference may be

nella

to the cutting

then gives a view of a wall with remains of


with rectangular laciinaria, which appears from

i.e.

from the Via Nomentana than the casale.

have been a part of the ruins of the nearer

Coppi

'

non diverso dalla via Nomentana, e

dall' iscrizione indicata.'

infra,

his account to be further

may

Ficulea

Nord Est non

e la I'incasso del clivo,

a poligoni

and a moveable wig) and a

now

villa

excavated

in

It

1824

disappeared.

{Diss. Ace. Pont. v. 232)

mentions the discovery of an inscription

dedicated to M. Aufelius Pronto, freedman of the emperor M. Aurelius

and of a brickstamp bearing the name of Faustina

The

sepulchral inscriptions C.

I.

(citing Fea).

L. xiv. 4007, 4008 (on the back of

in the tenuta of La Cesarina.


Whether ibid. 4027, 4029, 4050, 4052, 4053 (noted as 'Ficulensi' by
Amati) came from La Cesarina or from Olevano is doubtful. Cf. Kaibel,

4023) were also found by Vescovali

I.G.I. 1794, 2195.

As

it is,

the exact site of Ficulea remains

somewhat

uncertain.

the inscription had been found near

Dessau points out, even if


it might have stood outside the town

position,

its

As

original

and, further, fragments of

inscriptions recording other works executed by the same personage have

been

found

Capobianco

both
{C.I.L.

have been very

far

in

the church of

S.

Alessandro

{infra,

63)

and

at

But we know generally that it cannot


Cesarina.
It is certain that it lay on the road
from La
cit.

4013, 4014).

The

62

Rome

from

British School at Rome.

Nomentum, between

to

according to Liv.

iii.

the two places, inasmuch as this road,,


was originally known as Via Ficulensis and it was

52,

not far from Fidenae, for Varro (Z.Z.


the departure of the Gauls
finitimi alii

'

sub urbe

and Dionysius

(v.

after

18) speaks of 'qui tum

vi.

populi, ut Ficuleates ac Fidenates et

40) places the territory allotted to the

Claudian tribe between Fidenae and

(Bormann's emendation,

Ficulea^

Nor was it far from the


same author (i. 16) classes it with

^LKo\vea<; for Ilt/ceTia?, should be accepted).

Montes Corniculani

{supra, 56), for the

the cities built by the Aborigines, 'Avrefivdra^ kol TeWT]vei<i'^ kol ^iKoXveovf
Tov<;

irpix;

Ka\ov/uL6voi<;

rol<i

(C./.L. xiv. p.

Dessau

opeac kol Tc/3ovpTtvov<i.

K.opi>iK\oL<;

447) points out that Atticus' estate, which Cicero speaks of

(Ad Att. xii. 34), must be the same as that mentioned as


Nomentanum by Cornelius Nepos {Att. c. 14) and that Martial's estate at
Nomentum must also have been near the edge of the territory of Ficulea,

as Ficolense

27 he calls his friend Nepos bis vicinum, because he


Rome, and outside it dwelt at Veteres Ficeliae,' in the
same neighbourhood as himself The epithet vetus, which occurs also in Liv.
since in Epigr.

him

lived near

i.

may

38,

vi.

in

'

only refer to the fact that the origin of the place was lost

remote antiquity.

To suppose

Gentile or Torre

Lupara, the

site

having

later

neighbourhood of La Cesarina, as Nissen does


Ficulea does not appear

mentions

it

distinction
(Plin.

twice, in the

imperial

hear of a

the

to

H. N.

regard

in

among

iii.

to

times

rest

64,

first

of

107

Latium,

it

seems

xiv.

aedile

belonged

256
(see

L).

is

the

to

xiv.

in

vii.

dicundo

iure

who

1266)

he

contra-

in

The same

C.I.L.

and praefectus

cf Eph. Epigr.

unsafe.

in Pliny's list

latter

occurs

loc).

have had a municipal constitution,

to

4002

608),

ii.

Latium

really

Nomentum and Fidenae


it

on been moved to the

(pp. cit.

and the fourth region, though,

cf Liber Colon.

man who was an

faciundis (C.I.L.

the lost cities of

in

Monte

the existence of Ficulea vetus near

for

In

we

et sacris

restored

temple of Fortune and Victory, of decuriones and Seviri Augustales

(ibid.

4014) and of puelli et puellae alimentari Ficolensium, who dedicated an


inscription to Marcus Aurelius in 162 A.D. (ibid. 4003).
But again the
place where these were found

is

uncertain

Amati, who alone copied the

ii.
16 tells us that it was across the Anio, Pint. Popl. 21, that it was near the Anio, so
was probably rather to the S. of a straight line between the two places. Cf. Wissowa in
Pauly-Wissowa, I^.E. iii. 2650.
- Hiilsen (Pauly-Wissowa, A\E. iv. 1604) proposes to read ^ei^-t)vaiovs
for Tellenae was in a
different direction (Strabo, v. 3. 4, p. 231
Nibby, Analisi, iii. 146). See Addenda, infra, 208.
1

that

Liv.

it

Roman Campagna. II.

Classical Topography of the


first,

gives

found

with

it

4012, of which

ibid.

we have already spoken

4014 was

fragments, partly at S. Alessandro, partly at Capobianco

in

63

while

4003 was probably found in the Tenuta della Cesarina, but even this is
As Dessau remarks, all the other inscriptions inserted under
uncertain.
Ficulea, except those

which were found by Castellani

in

1826

in

the

neighbouring tenuta of Olevano, which belongs to the Borghese, are of the


ordinary military or sepulchral type.

Nor does an examination of

help us

the district

the road which

M. Consius Cerinthus repaired is no longer to be seen the only trace of


any ancient road is a cutting at the S. end of the Macchia della Cesarina,
which would lead back to the Via Nomentana and there are no remains

of an earlier date
the map,

Macchia

all

belong to the

itself

Nibby

the few ruins which we

would be a

{Aimlisi,

ii.

to the E., Gell {op.

hill

Roman

fairly

saw, and which are

good

site,

marked on

The space occupied by

period.

but evidence

is

the

entirely wanting.

48) seems inclined to place Ficulea on the next


cit.

247) at Torre Lupara

and

erroneous opinions {supra, 55, 59, 62


infi-a, 65).
The tenuta of Olevano lies to the N. of that of

there are other

casale

here

in

indicated as Casale Oleole on the map.

is

La

Cesarina

Excavations were made

1826 by Castellani, and various inscriptions were discovered

{C.I.L. xiv. 4001)

the

recording the restoration of a temple of the

one

Bona Dea,

{ibid. 4009,4020,4039,4040,4051,4054, 4055).


The
two are Christian sarcophagi, and are still in the Villa Borghese, but

the rest sepulchral


last

the rest have disappeared.

Returning to the Via Nomentana, we find a well-preserved piece of


the ancient paving on the

reach the so called

cemetery of

S.

left,

and, just after the loth kilometre stone,

Scavi del Papa S. Alessandro,' that

Alexander (probably not the Pope).

combe romane, 379


given in C.I.L.

'

sqq.

xiv.

Some

(see

the basilica and

of the pagan inscriptions found here are

index, but note that

4003, 4004a (for 4004),

given in error as belonging to S. Alessandro)

4017 are

all

found

Stevenson's notes {Vat. Lat. 1055

in

is,

See Marucchi, Cata-

copied there seem to have found their

way

1,

f-

3o)

others will be

^o^ "ot

all

that he

into the Corpus.

So Cingolani's map, Nibby, Avalisi, ii. 424 Tomassetti {op. cit. 50) puts it on the right of
Nomentana, at about the 12th kilometre from Rome, but wrongly.
- The
list
of the inscriptions found with 4001 given by Dessau in loc. (' Borghesiane,
Ficulesi, Aprile 1826,' praescripsit Amati huic et eis quae banc sequuntur) is full of errors, and
^

the Via

the inscriptions themselves must be consulted.

The

64

little

further on there

the

some

nearer the road,

left,

is

amount of

a considerable

on the right belonging

sides of the road, that

The

British School at Rome.

centre of the group

of the remains

debris on both

to a large villa, while

may

on

be attributed to tombs.

the mediaeval Torraccio di Capobianco, into

is

the upper part of which are built fragments of paving-stones and marble
it rests upon an ancient tomb, the chamber of which is of tufa concrete,

with a barrel vault, while the exterior was faced with slabs of travertine.
A little further on is the Casale Capobianco, which according to Nibby
(Analisi,

i.

384)

rests

Septimius Severus

upon the remains of a building of the time of

of which, however, no traces are now to be seen.

In excavations

made

in

October, 1795, in the tenuta of Capobianco,

8 miles from Rome, there were found the inscriptions C.I.L. vi. 764 (a
dedication to Stata Mater), xiv. 4015 (a curious and somewhat rare placard,
runnino" thus: in his praedis Aiireliae Faiistinianae balineiis lavatiiir')

more urbico

The

et

omnis Iminanitas pracstaUir'^), 4030 (a sepulchral inscription).

excavations

Todini)

were made

and besides the

by Ulisse

Pentini (Marini also

inscriptions, actual

mentions

remains of the baths were

found, with a mosaic pavement 2\\ palms (4-68 metres) square (which was

afterwards removed to Paris), with a hypocaust under


ately

terracotta tubes

by

and brick

pillars,

about

it,

supported altern-

Roman

feet apart.

The pavement was of geometrical design, and mainly in black and white.
Some curious capitals were also found, and in a dividing wall constructed
in later times many fragments of sculpture, including an Apollo in the
The
55.)
Etruscan style, and an Isis. (Guattani, Memoiae e7tciclop.
ii.

former Pentini at the date of his


or sold to

Domenico

letter

Arcieri, the latter

was

to Guattani
still in

his

(1806) had

own

given

possession.

At the Casale di Capobianco a branch road, which seems to be purely


modern, goes off to join the Strada Vecchia di Palombara, which, from
the point of junction onwards, is in use once more as a road of the
present day.

Via Nomentana is well preserved on both


sides of the casale: to the N.E. of It I measured the width as 4-157
From Capobianco the road runs on almost due
metres (14 feet).
N. and considerable portions of the pavement are at first preserved.

The pavement

of

the

Traces of unimportant buildings along


1

With

this inscription

scurra, the text of which

is

it

will

be found indicated

in

the

were found others, incUiding one of travertine with the epitaph of a


not given.

Classical Topography of the

map.

.sepulchral inscription cut

Roman Campagna. II.

65

on a travertine cippus found among

remains of a brick tomb near Casenuove is given in Not. Scav.


At the N. end of the Macchia della Cesarina is an apse in very
1895, 248.

the

bad brickwork, probably that of a church, facing 'S.W. it is 4 metres in


diameter, and has two small round-headed windows, ']6 cm. high and 30 wide
on the inside. It is probably to this that Martelli (of course wrongly)
:

alludes as the
nella

sommita

Temple

Mars of

of

della valle

il

ravvisa dal residuo del suo edifizio,

Torre Lupara e Casal


clivo per

cui vi si

S.

4012 'e certo che vi fosse


Marte di figura rotonda, come si
da varie spezzate colonnette che guardano
C.I.L. xiv.

tempio

di

Antonio, e da qualche segno di via lastricata nel


Near it is debris of all kinds fragments

ascendeva.'

of white marble, brick, concrete,

etc.,

with paving-stones.

same side, are other groups


Lupara
to the E. of it is a
Torre
close
to
more
of ruins, and there are
large reservoir with three chambers (Nibby, Analisi, ii. 342) which is
marked as Theatri rudera in Cingolani's map.
the 14th kilometre stone, on the

Beyond

'

On

'

the right of the road at the 14th kilometre

which occupies a remarkably strong


is

site,

the Casale S. Antonio,

is

though what

is

to be seen there

purely mediaeval.

The

ancient road must

now have run

which cuts through the foundations of some ancient buildings


afterwards

\t

turns off sharply to the

modern,

just to the right of the

N.E.,

and soon

making a steep descent and

and rejoining the modern road, which keeps round the head of the
Valle Valentino, just before the Casale di Monte Gentile, which, though

ascent,

probably occupies an ancient

mediaeval,

fragment of ancient construction between


an erroneous view {supra, 62),

site,
it

as there appears to be a

and the

Monte Gentile was

road.

the

site

According to
of Ficulea

in the centre of which

is
map puts it on a hill rather further S.,
point no in the map whereas Nibby {Analisi,
332) puts Caenina here,^
Macchia della Cesarina.
in
the
(doubtfully)
places
it
map
he
in
his
though

Canina

in his

i.

Gell

{op.

cit.

129)

125) at S. Angelo.

Rome

(i)

puts

it

The

Romulus was

N. of Turrita {infra, 173),

Westphal

place appears twice in the earliest

{op.

cit.

history of

sacrificing there (before the foundation of

Rome)

the shepherds of Numitor (Dionys.


79. 13),
won
the
first
Romulus
that
king
of
Caenina,
was
from
Aero,
(2)
the
Sabine
women,
spolia opima, in the battle following the rape of

when Remus was captured by


and

i.

it

This

is

the site selected by

Bormann

{Altlatin. Chorographie, 255) for Corniculum.

The

66

British School at Rome.

when the people of Caenina were

the

Pliny's

lo).

i.

towns of Latium {H.N.

of the lost

list

Romans, but

to attack the

first

were easily defeated and their city taken (Liv.

68)

iii.

figures

in

and of

its

It
:

we really know nothing, except that it must have been situated close
to Rome, as it is mentioned in connexion with Crustumerium and
Antemnae (Liv. loc. cit.).
It gave its name to a priesthood of the Roman
State, which still existed in the time of the Empire (cf Hiilsen and Wissowa
site

Pauly-Wissowa, R.E.

in

der Romer, 447 sgg.

iii.

Miiller's

in

HandbucJi der Klass. Altertumsw.

Just N. of the i6th kilometre stone

made

Wissowa, Religion tind Kultus

1278, 1279;

of chips of white limestone, perhaps a conserva as

48) conjectures, but more probably a tomb, but on the

on the right

On

(as Tomassetti, op.

cit.

v. 4).

an oblong chamber of concrete

is

Nibby

left

{Schede,

i.

of the road, not

58, n. 2, says).

Nibby {Schede, cit.) noticed a rudere informe forse di


sepolcro
and on the same side, a little further on, is the large tomb,
crowned by a mediaeval tower, marked in the map as Torre Mancini. Nibby
the right
'

{Schede,
Titus.

i.

'

48) notes that the cornice

The

is

in the style of that of the

sepulchral inscription, Epk. Epigr.

vii.

Arch of

1263, found on

the

beyond the i6th kilometre stone, is referred


to the first of these three tombs by Gatti {Bull. Com. 1888, 181
cf Not.
Scav. 1888, 288).
It is a large cippus, erected to Ulpia Euhodia by her
husband, T. Flavins Aug. lib. DelpJiicus, tabidarius a ratio\ii\{ibus)
right of the road, 25 metres

interpretation

is

doubtful

successive procuratorships

thesaurorum hereditatium
the

accounts,

Alexandrinus

To

the
(cf.

Dessau supposes that we have here three


Mommsen, that the man was 'procurator rationis
fisci

money,

Alexandrini,'

and

Bull. Inst. Diritto

the

i.e.

Rom.

i.

that he

modern

had charge of

accruing

legacies

the

fiscus

in 1888,

600 m.
Here a

to

261).^

the N.E. of Torre Mancini excavations were

to the E. of the

The

thesaurorum hereditatium fisci Alexmidrinii).

\j)\roc{urator) ration{is)

made

road, along the course of a small stream.

small but elegant private bath establishment was discovered, a plan and
description of which are given in Not. Scav. 1888, 285 sqq.

full

the brickstamps found are given by Tomassetti,^/.


is

said

name
^

by him
of T.

to belong to the Flavian period

Flavius

cit.

59

n.).

Hirschfeld {Die Kaiserlichen

Verivaltungsbeamten

bis

Some

of

building

but the stamp bearing the

Cerinthus cannot be earlier than

decides in favour of Dessau's view.

The

auf Diocletian

the
(1905),

time of
369

sqi}.),

Classical Topography of the

Roman Campagna. II.

67

Hadrian {C.I.L. xv. 710)


the fragment Cn port
li
cannot be
exactly identified, but must belong to a rather later period (or at least
;

to a date not before 140 A.D.)

the time of M. Aurelius.

while the third {C.I.L. xv. 754b) belongs to

In Not. Scav.

C.I.L. XV. 2392, the date of

which

is

cit.

the only brickstamp given

is

quite uncertain.

The principal hall had been restored in the fourth century, and in its
pavement were found the sepulchral inscription Epii. Epigr. vii. 1264 and
some other fragments and in one of the small baths was another
;

sepulchral inscription (Jbid. 1265).

To

Monte Palombaro,

the N. of this building, on the S. slope of the

a large water reservoir, from which

of the road, just N. of the Fosso

le

it

was very

To

likely supplied.

Spallette di S. Margherita, in the

the

is

W.

Tenuta

Conca, remains of mosaic pavements, and walls lined with red plaster, were
found in 1884 also two tombs with some luiguentaria in them, and a coin of
:

The

place seemed to have been already explored {Not. Scav. 1884,


In 1889 two fragments of the Acta Fratrum Arvalium were discovered

Hadrian.
39).

here in the walls of a mediaeval church (Tomassetti,

Com. 1890,

no;

C.I.L.

vi.

32395).

op. cit. 62, n.

In Not. Scav. 1892, 51,

stated that they were found in the baths just described.

the fragments

Monte

the

is

remarkable {C.I.L.

d'Oro, there

descends steeply, and

The

is

Bull.

wrongly

dispersion of

Further to the N. again, on

3261).

is

another reservoir.

is

protected on the descent

Before reaching this the road

which keep up the bank on each side

walls

and

vi. p.

it

by massive supporting

they are in reticulatum

brick, with apsidal niches alternating with projecting buttresses,

weepholes to allow the moisture

on the right are

the

more

to escape (Tomassetti, op.

conspicuous,

cit.

but those on

the

and

Those

60).
left

have

recently been cleared.

To

the

N.W. of

the reservoir on the

Monte d'Oro

there are traces of

construction in the bank on the right of the road, while on the


a circular chamber

475 metres

a lighthole at the top.


uncertain.

little

It is

in diameter,

cemented within, and

further on

is

left

sunk below the road


its

there

level,

is

with

purpose and date are

the Romitorio, and to the N. of

it

the wall

tomb in opus quadratum, which can be traced running E. and W. across


the modern road
the ancient road must therefore have kept more to the
W. Beyond it again, on the right, is an oblong chamber in concrete below
the level of the road
perhaps belonging to a tomb. Nibby notes {Schede,
of a

The theory

that

Nomentum was

situated

on the Monte d'Oro has

little

to

recommend

F 2

it.

Thk British School at Rome.

68

the discovery of travertine steps and of fairly good sculptures here

'/.)

not long before 1823.

The Via Nomentana

now

is

joined

by the cross-road from Tibur

Excavations were conducted

described supra, 57.

built of blocks of travertine

in

along the

1901

in

The

portion of this road, and six tombs were laid bare.

first

was entirely

the angle on the spectator's right was built

cippus of the same stone, bearing the inscription Iterprivatu{vi).

in a

first

This

cannot have referred to the road on which the tombs stood, but probably
to the pathway, 84 cm. wide, between this

second tomb was found a sepulchral

about

metres

40

reticulatum

off,

tomb and the next. In the


The rest were found

inscription.

and were partly of brickwork, partly of opus

two sepulchral inscriptions were found

in situ

and

in

two of

the urns were found four^ lead plates with defixiones {Not. Scav. 1901, 205
sgq.

Pauly-Wissowa, R.E.

iv.

2373

sgq.).

To the N.E. are two reservoirs, belonging no doubt to villas, while to


the W. at point 201 are more ruins.
The road descends steeply and then re-ascends to Mentana, there being
no traces of antiquity in its last portion. The modern village probably
occupies the lower part of the site

extended further
able

to the E., the only side

on the other

protected

sides, especially

by ravines

Nomentum, which

of the ancient

upon which there

on the W. and

(cf Nibby, Analisi,

ii.

413).

remains of walls or of buildings attributable to

it

There
to

space avail-

is

the position

S.,

are,

is

well

however, no

be seen in

The

situ.

by the distance of 14 miles from Rome


given by the Tabula Peutingerana, which leaves no room for doubt.
Monte
d'Oro is over a mile too near to Rome, whereas the 14 miles take us
and the name, Mentana, is obviously
just up to the modern village
site

however, really fixed

is,

derived from

Nomentum.

magistrates and

its

though the exact


remarks

Inscriptions have been found here, too, in which

priesthoods are mentioned (C.I.L. xiv. 3955, 3956),


site of their discovery is not known.
As Dessau

{C.I.L. xiv. p. 440), there

was considerable doubt

Romans themselves whether Nomentum was

the

belonged

in

origin to the Latin or the Sabine race

opinion rightly prevailed,


sufficiently
^

So

the fourth

find that Vergil {Ae7i.

undecided to give both

in the text,
is

we

though

in

illustrations of three only

not further mentioned.

two

in

the minds of

to be considered to

though the former

vi.

different

have

773,

712) was

vii.

passages

There

(two inscribed on both sides) are given, and

Roman Campagna. II.

Classical Topography of the

69

appears to have been a theory that the Anio formed the boundary of

Latium

in

very early times (PHn. H.N.

iii.

54),

which would account

for this

discrepancy (but see Addenda, infra, 208).

Nomentum was
which the Latins

and we hear of

given the civitas sine suffragio after the

tried to
it

contend against Rome,

whose highest magistrate, even in


had also aediles and qiiaestores alimen-

as a municipitini,

imperial times, was a dictator

it

toruvi, a flanieji perpetuus duunivirali potestate, a

Magna

municipal priest of the

Otherwise we hear

Mater, and, apparently, seviri Augustaks.

nothing of

it

Tomassetti

though the

as a town,

hood, and especially of


In the town itself

in

B.C. (Liv. viii. 14),

338

in

war

last

may

fertility

vineyards,

its

of the estates in

often praised

is

neighbour-

its

by Pliny and Martial.

be seen some fragments of statuary, noted by

{op. cit. 62, n.)

and the sepulchral inscriptions

may add

that

saw

C.I.L. xiv. 3948,

C.I.L.

3958 (which

3961, 3962, 3972-4,^ 3976, 3992.

Dessau was unable to

garden of the Casale Cicconetti

find) in the

in

1898.

Discoveries of inscriptions are noted as having occurred early in the

nineteenth

century

the

3985, 3991a are described

sepulchral

inscriptions

by Amati

as having been found 'in the great

cemetery along the Via Nomentana

in

'

C.I.L.

xiv.

1807; while C/.Z.

3958, 3959,

xiv.

3945 (a

sepulchral inscription erected by a vigintisexvir and his family in the time


Excavations were made
of Augustus) was found by shepherds in 181 7.

by Prince Borghese in the neighbourhood of Mentana in 1830, 1831, and


In December, 1830, not far from Mentana a torso believed to be
1833.
Tomassetti, however {loc.
that of Bacchus {Bull. Inst. 183 1, 29) was found
small heads and various
several
apparently,
Hylas
and,
as
cit.), speaks of it

terra-cottas {Btdl. Inst. 1832,

6).

Inscriptions from the Borghese excavations are given, from


copies, in C.I.L. xiv. 3941

dictator

before

(a

dedication by D. Valerius Proculus, aedile,

and quaestor alimentorum,


1832, and probably by the

dedication

to

Amati's

to Isis

and Serapis, found not long

Borghese), 3942

(a

fragment of a

Augustus, Tiberius, Germanicus and Drusus(?) found

in

October, 1833), 3943 (a fragment of a dedication to Tiberius), 3947, 3950,


Amati notes that many other inscriptions
3951, 3954, 39S2, 3986, 3992a.

were
1

'

found at Nomentum,' but, of course, not necessarily

Fabretti [inscr.

241, 655) saw 3961

'at the

13th mile of the Via

in

these excava-

Nomentana'

{i.e.
the ruins of an ancient theatre
group are so much alike that Dessau thinks that they must have been found together.
'

[i.e.

near

149) 3973, 3974 'at the i nh mile near


the reservoir near Monte Gentile, supra, 65), but the whole

the tombs alluded to supra, 67, 68) and {ibid. 371, 148,


The

70

The

tions.

British School at Rome.

sepulchral inscription C.I.L.

the Quarto della Mezzaluna, which

Excavations were also made

ibid.

cannot

3975 was copied by him

in

locate.

1864 by Bondi and Ferri, a building

in

being found with decorative mosaics and columns of grey marble.

Roads diverge from Mentana

in various directions

there

is,

in

the

first

one running E. to join the road to Palombara a little beyond Osteria


Nuova {supra, 57), which probably follows an ancient line, though no

place,

certain

traces of

antiquity are

its

somewhat

buildings are

scanty.

be seen, and

to

remains of ancient

Another, of which we shall speak presently,

runs due N. in continuation of the line of the Via Nomentana.

N.W.

runs

to

Monte Rotondo

{supra, 26).

Upon

it

(?)

third

are the devas-

tated remains of the cemetery of SS. Primus and Felicianus, placed at the

14th or 15th (so Cod. Bern.) mile of the Via

Nomentana

(the church, which

Bosio saw, has been replaced by a modern chapel), and further on is the
site of the church and cemetery of S. Restitutus (which Bosio saw, but

which are now no longer


Cappuccini of Monte

the

visible) at

Rotondo.

i6th mile, to

The cemetery

(perhaps S. Eutyches) was situated 18 miles

Nomentana
106,

and

fourth

in

is

Kraus, Realencyclopddie,

that which

is

ii.

124

E.

of the

of an

Rotna Sotterranea, 416; Stevenson,

{'Qoslo,

the

unknown saint
from Rome, on the Via

Tomassetti,

supposed by some writers

Crist.

i5^///.

1880,

op. cit. 6^, n.).

to be the

Via

Salaria,

but wrongly {supra, 24, 49).

V.

The Via Nomentana (prolonged)

{from Mentana
This
side,

line

of road,

and runs very

to the

Via Salaria at Fabbrica Palmieri).

we have

as

seen, leaves

slightly E. of N. to join

Fabbrica Palmieri, between the 25th and

Though
there

is

no actual pavement
no doubt as to its antiquity.
there

is

in situ
It

route to the Via Salaria, as the distance

good deal more


inasmuch as

it is

the Itineraries:
course.

hilly

and

it

26th

the

upon

it

may have
by

it is

Nomentum on

the N.

the Via Salaria near the

mile

from

(Westphal,

Rome.

op. cit. 124),

served as an alternative

about the same, but

does not seem to have been

much

it is

frequented,

not to be found either in the Tabula Peutingerana or


and there are very i&w remains of antiquity along

in
its

Roman Campagna. II.

Classical Topography of the

On

the

reservoir

right

the

is

so-called

about 10 metres long,

divided into two

aisles,

Torretta,

two

in

water

lower of which

storeys, the

Roman

each only 6

upon

built

71

feet wide,

is

without trace of

intercommunication, while the upper chamber was apparently undivided.

may possibly indicate that the


To the left is the Casale

This subdivision

separate buildings.

occupies the

and

travertine

speaks

site

of an ancient

building

and the three

bricks,

that representing

reservoir supplied three

Manzi, which

there

basreliefs of

many

blocks

which Gori

{op. cit.

are

a horseman whipping his horse

of a cippus, the front, with the inscription, being


against which

it

sarcophagus

with

(?)

is

built

the second

is

is

dictated

of junction of the Via Salaria and Via


{supra,

Nomentum

which

24),

leads

to

Eretum

was situated a mile nearer

At

first

and a half

of

from

{pp. cit.

is

just N. of
to

crosses the Fosso di Gattaceca

is,

Mentana

suppose

modern Mentana

66

of two

relief

his view that the point

or

that
else

it

the erroneous view that

it

cf supra, 6y,

our road presents no traces of antiquity


it

third

necessity

and to accept

Rome

by

Nomentana

him

did not occupy the site of the

would be too close

hidden by the wall

His theory that Eretum stood here

however, absolutely impossible, and

itself

of
68)

on the back

is

a fragment of a frieze

marine monsters, and the

peacocks pecking at a basket.

certainly

after

n.).

about a mile

by a modern bridge,

in

the

construction of which ancient paving-stones have been largely employed

and soon afterwards

it

is

joined by a path from

Monte Rotondo, which

continues E. past Castel Chiodato to join the road to Palombara, and

probably follows the


thinks),
it

though there

takes.

114, n. i)

line of
is

an ancient road (as Nibby, Analisi,

no positive evidence except the straight

At Gattaceca, Nibby

{Analisi,

ii.

ii.

line

144) and Tomassetti

374,

which

{op. cit.

put the junction of the Via Salaria (which the latter therefore

brings up past

Monte Rotondo) and the Via Nomentana.


we reach the ruins of Grotta Marozza, which

In about another mile

those of a mediaeval fortress (Guattani, Mon. Sabini,

ii.

351

are

Tomassetti,

Nibby {Analisi, ii. 143) and Gell {pp. cit. 201) wrongly
identified the site with Eretum {supra, 24, 28).
The Aquae Labanae mentioned by Strabo (v. 3. 11, p. 238, Totavra he
{i.e. similar to the Aquae Albulae^) koI ra Aa^avd, ovk airwdev tovtwv iv

op. cit.

TTJ

113 sqq^.

^wfievravfi

teal
^

toI<;

Trepl 'Wprjrov Toirot'i)

may, on the other hand, be

Strabo calls the Aquae Albulae 'cold' {infra, 117,

n.

i).

The

72
placed
the

neighbourhood

this

in

marked

villa

British School at Rome.

our

in

there

map

E. of

is

a sulphur spring a

little

way

S.

of

Grotta Marozza, and another two

and a half miles further N.E. the former is no doubt that which bears
name Bagni di Grotta Marozza (Nibby, loc. cit.).
;

the

To

the N.E. of Grotta Marozza there are the remains of several other

of no great importance

villas,

one of them, on the Monte

N.E.

Villa, just

of the Fosso Buffala, has a supporting wall of polygonal blocks of travertine.

To

the E. of

this,

and

male statues lying


in

in

They may

field.

any case they were only intended

about

life 'size,

N. are the ruins

two headless

just E. of the Fontanile del Tesoro, are

tomb
They are

very likely belong to a

to be seen from the front.

To

draped, and badly executed in white marble.

known

the

as the Grottoline (point 175 on the map), a water

reservoir 9-20 metres in length, divided into

two

aisles

each 2'53 metres

width by a wall pierced by three arches, each with a span of 2*40 metres.
These arches are 171 metre high, and above them are smaller arches with
a span of r26 metre, 80 cm. in height.
The dividing wall is 87 cm. in
in

and the outer walls 80 cm.

thickness,

To

the E.N.E. of the Grottoline there

village of Cretone,

To

N.N.W. of

the

is

another

close to the

villa,

which does not present any definite traces of antiquity.


it is

the second of the sulphur springs mentioned above,

near to which in the valley are the remains of a building, possibly of baths,
while to the
concrete wall
the

hill

W.

of

it

is

a deep pool, on one side of which

(probably a dam), apparently not of

From

On.

Cretone, a path, which presents no traces of antiquity, runs S.E..

from Castel Chiodato to Palombara {supra,

crossing the line of that which runs N. towards

58).

After

Monte Venere, it passes S.


The building,

remains of a church on the Colle Pedeschiavo.

of the

which faces 40 N. of
is

a massive
date.

to the E. of the sulphur spring stood a villa.

to join the road

plan

is

Roman

E.,

may have

hardly that of a church.

which two

served originally for other uses, as

its

doorway 205 metres wide, in front of


though for a porch, leads into a

pillars project I'^o metre, as

chamber 7'8 metres in length and about 370 in width, from which a
doorway ri6 metre wide (the total length of the threshold block being
2*3

metres) leads into another chamber 3'o8 metres in length, and the

same

in

width as the

first.

On

the S.E. side a

chamber 280 metres

in

width runs the whole length of the building.

The

construction of the walls, which vary in width from 50 to 95 cm.,.

Roman Campagna. II.

Classical Topography of the


is

remarkably bad, and the materials are of various kinds.

were found a

Roman

73

In the building

sepulchral statue, and other fragments of sculpture

Etrusco-Campanian ware, with palmettes stamped

a piece of black glazed

on the bottom, and a marble slab with a Pagan sepulchral inscription,

SVLPICIVS C

L.

CHRESIMVS

HIRPIAQLMVSA
CMARCIV5 CLTiEOPIILVS
N CASSIVS CN LEPAHRA

C SVLPICIVS C L 5ALVI VS
The

slab measures 45 cm. wide

from 40 to 22

mm.

by 425 mm.

and the

high,

letters vary^

in height.

There are also several fragments of tomb

inscriptions,

EGNATIVs)

PHILARGV

one of the doorposts of the

earlier building,

and fragments of the top of the

screen of the presbytery with the inscription

VIRGINzS-O

LIS

which indicates that


in the so-called

it

GRATES .... CERUNTB .... VITE + ANwas dedicated

to the Virgin.

The pavement was

opus Alexandrinwn, squares of white marble alternating

with fragments of red porphyry and green serpentine.^

Returning to the road which we


that

it

continues to run in a straight

the road

to

found the brickstamp

^ These objects are


examine them.

in the possession of

near Grotta

left

line.

I
|

xAmong the

CVICI

Marozza, we find
brick rubbish by

with the cornucopiae on

Signor Bonfigli of Palombara,

who

kindly allowed

me

The British School at Rome.

74
the right

xv. 15 ii:

variety of C.I.L.

At

paving-stones loose in the path.


are

some blocks of squared stone


probably belonging to the

itself,'

beyond

paving-stones

it

may

and there are some limestone

the bridge over the Fosso Buffala there


the stream bed and in the bridge

in

structure

earlier

be seen

in

the

and on the ascent

The

field walls.

descends to the valley of the Fiora, turning sharply to the


straight

with

line

course up

its

entirely mediaeval, but perhaps


join the

Via Salaria

At the top of

at

the

Eretum

hill

till

now

is

now

road

In a

left.

Torre Fiora, which

the

is

marks the starting point of a road

to

{supra, 29).

our road becomes practicable for carriages for a

short distance, as far as the Osteria di Moricone, a cross-road diverging to

To the E. of the point of


it to the modern Via Salaria.
some ruins of uncertain date.
A little way beyond the Osteria the road is crossed at right angles by a
path coming from the Via Salaria at the Riserva Moscio, and running to
the

W.

joining

junction are

Palombara, which

made

for

it

370 metres

A
W.

little

of the

in

probability follows an ancient line

all

between two
in

hills

W.

to the

the cutting

Monte Venere

{infra, 83),

width, shows every sign of antiquity.

we are following is clear on the


tomb (?) on its E. edge, and of a

further on, the cutting of the road

modern

path, with the remains of a

more extensive building a

little

large mediaeval castle to the

W.

two limestone paving-stones.

further

off.

Just S. of Tre Ponti there

is

of the road, in the walls of which are one or

After this point cuttings

E. side of the present path, but, as the soil

is

soft

may

be seen on the

and sandy,

age

their

is

and the same remark applies to the cutting by which it ascends


the modern road from the station of Passo Corese to Monte Libretti

uncertain
to

of

{supra, 32)

Chaupy

and to those through which

{op. cit.

put passer au
road,

iii.

lieu

it

passes

below

90) seems, however, to have seen traces of

Madonna della Spiga


map Madonna della Vigna

appele

marked on the

la

'

(a chapel

Grande),

'

this
it

'

village.
elle

on the modern
et sous

Monte

Libretti ou Ton en voit les vestiges les plus sensibles devant la vigne

du

Prince.'

Monte Libretti contains no traces of antiquity,^ except some marble


columns and other fragments, and two incomplete inscriptions noted by
Stevenson ( Vat. Lat. 1055 i, f. 56, 56'). The first, upon half a cippus in good
^

Various conjectures as to

its

ancient

name

are given by Nibby, Aualisi,

ii.

347.

Classical Topography of the

Roman Campagna. II.

he saw lying near one of the first houses


by which the modern road enters the village. The
lettering,

[CRVM

at the foot of the

inscription runs

75
hill


The

^6

British School at Rome.

and, though well constructed and cemented,


so that to visit

it is

it

has fallen

in to

some extent,

neither very easy nor very safe.

Stevenson also notes

below the Miglioria

{ibid.) that

remains of

Higclli

many

baths had been found, with lead pipes (apparently uninscribed), and

stamped bricks (afterwards

To

lost),

and fragments of marble.

Monte Libretti the road we have been following


approaches the modern road from Palombara and Moricone to the
N. of

the

Fabbrica Palmieri {infra, 80


line,

sqq.)

itself

probably follows an ancient

though between Moricone and Monte Libretti there are no traces of

large reservoir in opus reticiilatiini


thick,

On

and then turns due N.

antiquity),

is

(which

the

W.

of

it

are the remains of a

the one wall preserved

is

only 46 cm.

decreasing to 38 cm. about two metres above ground

level,

but

by internal buttresses 30 cm. thick and 75 cm. wide.


length and width are not determinable.
The ruin is known

strengthened

The

original

as the

Muraccio delle Sterparelle {supra,

Further to the N. but

slill

on the

33).

VV. of the road, brick

be seen in two places (indicated on the map), while on the


the E. of the road Stevenson {Cod.

cit.

may

fragments

CoUe

S.

Biagio to

57) notes that he was informed of

the existence of ruins, water cisterns, and other remains of antiquity.

Guattani {Mon.
walls between

Sabijii,

Monte

73) mentions the existence of massive Cyclopean

ii.

Libretti

and Montorio Romano, which

lies

four miles

to the E. in the hills.

At

the Osteria della Creta our road joins the Via Salaria {supra, 34),

and to complete our survey of the

now

to return to

territory under examination we have


Palombara and work north- and north-westwards.

Palombara and District.

VI.

The town

of Palombara stands on an isolated

hill,

but the place itself

presents no certain traces of antiquity, and neither

nor Gell

Cameria

{op.
is,

cit.

attempted to identify

339)

for

know from Dionys.


Verginius attacked

(502 B.C.)

it

however, placed here by some writers, though, as

remarks (Pauly-Wissowa, R.E.

We

Nibby {op. cit. ii. 530)


with any ancient site.

v.
it

49 that
at

1428), there

iii.

dawn

it

no

is

lay about a night's

after

having

and from the towns with which

it

left

is

Ficulea vetus, Crustumerium, Ameriola, Medullia,

Hiilsen

sufficient evidence.

march from Rome,

Rome

in

the evening

mentioned (Corniculum,

Nomentum Liv.

i.

38)

Roman Campagna. II.

Classical Topography of the

we can conclude

that

Nibby

Sabine Mountains.
in the

Anio

lay N. of the Anio, E. of the Tiber,

it

about a mile to the


disappeared

'

iii.

The

certainly

it
it

had completely

of the lost cities of

list

Palombara molte monete

curious type

by Armellini
lines

La

at

{Cronichetta,

of flange

bottom

top and

in

di musaico.'

tomb of a

described

formed of two parallel


at the

putting

136) puts

in

{pp. cit.

given in Bull. Inst. 1832, 6

is

Antonio Barbarossa ha trovato

is

wrong
It

83).

Pliny's

in

and W. of the

68).

finding of a

Palombara,

is

{infra,

and occurs

di bronzo, ed un pavimento

others

353)

i.

and Vicovaro: Gell

following record of discoveries

Sig.

II

cit.

of Moricone

S.

later times,

in

Latium {H.N.

The

{pp.

valley between Tivoli

yy

tiles

Cascianella, near

1883,

was

It

142).

about 80 cm. apart, with

the skeletons were placed within in a

long row without partitions.

marble weight (decussis) found near Palombara was presented by

Sig. Bonfigli to the


it

Museo

Terme

delle

The

in 1901-2.

At Palombara
four to the S. of

it

and Montecelio

there

is

an important meeting-point of roads

that from Tivoli

{infra, 177),

{infra, 173), the

Rome

and that from

two from

Museum.

there are

S.

Francesco

from

{supra, 58); that

Palombara to Moricone and

Tivoli continues N. of

which

inscription

bears will shortly be published by Sig. Vaglieri, Director of the

to the

Via

Salaria,

having a branch to the NAV. {supra, 74) shortly after leaving Palombara.
It may be well, however,, to examine first the remains on the lower
slopes of

Due

Monte Gennaro,

to the E.

and N.E. of the town.

E. of the Casino Belli {infra, 176) are the remains of a villa which

had two platforms, on the upper of which was a large open


remains of marble (including a piece of the rare granito
painted plaster show that

To

the N.E. of

it

was

circular piscina

finely decorated.

the ruined monastery of S. Nicola, which

it is

and

della sedia)

upon the remains of a very large

villa

is

with four distinct platforms

built
:

the

massive substruction walls are of optis reticulatum, with the exception of

one (only preserved

to

the

height of one

course)

which

is

in

quasi-

horizontal masonry.

To
parallel

the

N.N.W. of

terraces

this villa,

(increasing,

to

and

facing, like

the

W.

it,

20 S. of W., are five

of point 695, to eight)

rising

one above the other on the hillside. On the Colle Tiutillo, immediately
to the N.W. of point 695, which is crowned by the ruins of a mediaeval

The

78

British School at Rome.

castle (II Castiglione), similar terraces

sides (six

on the former, two on the

may

respectively 25 E. of S. and 25 S. of

W.

be observed on the

S.

but not on the N. and

latter),

and

W.

E., facing

(the one wall observable on the

N. side belongs to the substruction of a road descending to the valley of


the Fosso Palamento)

while on the

W.

Monte Madano.to the

slopes of the

E. of the Ponte Grosso, there are six such terraces.


walls

all

same

present the

characteristics

These Cyclopean

they arc built of rough blocks of

which have probably been broken with hammers 'but have


not been smoothed, varying in width and height from 40 to 70 cm. and in
local limestone,

depth from 50 cm. to

They

metre.^

rise to

a height of 2 to

metres, and

are apparently about i"50 metre thick, the inner side naturally not standing
free

but an exact measurement

is,

as a rule, impossible

stone debris which covers the top of the terrace (Fig.

about

metres

in

width, the

amount of

on the

in width, 8-41 in

r8o

is

generally

is

more or less level) ground


are some 30 to 50 metres apart.

to the rule that the blocks are not dressed

S. side of the Colle Tiutillo,

second terrace, there

to the lime-

This

level (or

behind varying considerably, and the terraces

There are some exceptions

owing

6).

a platform projecting from

depth to the wall

at the back,

it,

measuring 9-05 metres

which

yy cm. thick, and

is

m. in height, the blocks of which are carefully dressed

the inner and the outer faces having been smoothed

and jointed, both

and 6 metres behind the

sixth and uppermost platform, just below the Castiglione, there


cistern in the terrace, 2 metres in depth,

is

an open

measuring 4*85 by 5*50 metres,

which the blocks are much more carefully smoothed and jointed than
platform

itself (Fig.

The apparent

7).

this terrace (Fig. 8), as contrasted

from the bottom (Fig.

9),

may

in

in

the

regularity in the construction of

with the irregularity visible in the third

be due to chance (the limestone often fracturing

horizontally), or possibly to difference in date of erection


is

thus,

near the S.W. angle, on the line of the

by no means a necessary supposition.

though the

latter

have discussed the question of

variation of style in Cyclopean constructions in which difference of date

cannot be admitted
Fran^aise, 1905, 181
It will

be seen,

too,

most wall) that

its

in

connexion with the walls of Circeii {Melanges de

sgq.),

from Fig. 6
regularity

notice a wall going 20


^

and need

W.

(a

is,

of N.

not,

think, repeat here

view taken along the


after

{i.e.

all,

I'Ecole

have

said.

line of the upper-

not so very great.

at right angles)

(I

must

also

from near the W.S.W.

Typical blocks measured 58 x 45, 60 x 35, 54 x 40, 66 x 70 x 65 cm.


93 cm. high.

in Figs. 6, 7 is

what

The

stick

which appears

Classical Topography of the


end of the uppermost

W.

the

terrace,

The
it is

forming the edge of a large


This wall

of the Castiglione.

of a single block, and

its

Roman Campagna. II.

thickness

expanse

to

only preserved to the height

is

apparently about

is

flat

79'

question as to the object of these constructions

metres.)

now

arises

and

a fortunate thing that investigations recently carried on in the neigh^

bourhood of Norba supply an extremely probable answer.


Above the Abbey of Valvisciolo, not far from the station of Sermoneta,
at a place called

there

is

Rava

Roscia, on the

W.

Monte Carbolino,
Their position is shown in the

a group of similar constructions.

slopes of the

in Not. Scav. 1901, 517, and a short


Signori Savignoni and Mengarelli,
by
554
who were in charge of the Government excavations at Norba, while a longer
article on the same subject will be found in Not. Scav. 1904, 407 sqq.,
in which the same writers deal with the results of their investigations in
Further explorations have been carried on in April and May, 1905,
1903.
Mengarelli and Paribeni. The platforms of Rava Roscia were
Signori
by
at first supposed to belong to a road ascending the mountain side in zig-zags,
but further examination has shown that this was not the case,Hnasmuch as

general plan of the environs of


description of them

given

is

Norba

ibid.

these platforms run generally in straight or sharply broken lines, often

Some

almost horizontally, and as a rule without intercommunication.

them

maximum

the

of

are preserved to their original height, which varied in different cases,

being over seven metres.

they might have served to support the

soil

Another supposition was that


necessary for cultivation

the steep bare mountain slopes would have presented

but

an unfavourable

opportunity, and the width of available ground would have been small

when

while the choice of such a site would be very hard to explain,

Pomptine Marshes
It

just

below afforded such a vast expanse of

seems therefore more

Paribeni that

we have

the

fertile land.

probable to Signori Savignoni, Mengarelli

and

here a system of terraces which served as an effective

with several successive lines of defences, and at the same time


an object for which some of themto support the huts of the inhabitants
They cite {Not. Scav. 1904, 409, n.) as a
still serve at the present day.

fortification,

parallel,

and

in

my

have been speaking,


locally
1

N.W.

In

opinion quite rightly, the terrace walls of which


in

known, though,
my

as

we have

opinion an exception must be

extremity, which ascends

we

the neighbourhood of Palombara, where they are

made

seen, wrongly, as

'

stradoni

in favour of the lowest of the

somewhat sharply

in a curve.

'

or roads.

group towards the

The British School at Rome.

8o

There

in fact,

is,

a very close similarity between the two cases, while at

Rava Roscia excavations have confirmed the conclusions already arrived


at {Not. Scav. 1904, ciL).

In the ground behind the terrace walls and

among

the stones of the

walls themselves fragments of pottery belonging to the

were discovered,

one place, an undisturbed inhumation

aiid, in

a considerable quantity of pottery

and other

Scav.

But

type.

all

bucchero,

may

do two

burial,

with

tombs of the

may

be assigned

Jiydriae of the Villanova

these are of course anterior to the creation of the terrace

owing

walls, which,

and

1903, 342 sqq.)

to the 8th century B.C., including as they

Age

which are contempo-

objects,

rary with and closely similar to those found in the oldest


necropolis of Caracupa {Not.

Iron

first

them of many fragments of

to the discovery near

be assigned to the 6th century

fine

B.C.

The work of the present spring has led to the discovery in one place
number of small votive objects in pottery, including specimens

of a large

Latin ware, of bucchero, and of Italo-Greek types.

both of archaic

It

would appear, indeed, that the present settlement, like the necropolis of
Caracupa, ceased to be in use when Norba began to be for at Norba
:

nothing has been found which takes us back beyond the 5th
the 6th) century B.C. {Not. Scav. 1901, 539, 558

At Palombara

Norba

at

and
would very

is

good deal

and, in the absence of excavations,

noticed no fragments of pottery there.


striking

1903, 261).

the slopes are less steep, but the ground

more stony and bare than


I

(or possibly

But the

parallel

is

interesting

and a comparative study of the two groups of constructions

My

likely lead to important results.

bara group lacks any plan of the platforms

description of the Palom-

in detail

this

would have

taken considerable time and trouble to make, even with the help of a

competent surveyor, and would have required,


clear,

the

of the

to

make

it

complete and

accurate mathematical determination of the relative elevation

various

As

walls.

am

not without hope of

devote more attention to the subject,

my

description

being

able

to

must be regarded

as provisional.

Returning to the road going N. from Palombara, we find that a path


soon diverges from

it

to the

N.W., said

in its first portion

not explored) to retain traces of ancient pavement.

Nomentana (prolonged)
di

Moricone {supra,

at right angles a little

74).

The church

way

It

(which

crosses the

have

Via

to the N. of the Osteria

of S. Michele, to the E. of the

Classical Topography of the

occupy an ancient
feet in height

On

and

An

site.
i

in

14th

the

paintings of

highroad, has

now

To

visible.

the ancient road

may

does

century, but

not

seem

apparently preserved as a sacred

is

to

the bank on the

in

relic.

has been found, of which no

villa

pavement of

the E. of this point traces of the

be seen

8i

unfluted column of white marble about 7

diameter

the Colle Veneziano, to the W., a

traces are

Roman Campagna. II.

W.

of the modern.

The

variations in the course of the former from that of the latter are indicated,

both here and to the

was only made


to

the N.

in

we reach

map

of Palombara, from a

S.

1868) kindly lent

me by

the district called

new road (which

of the

Sig. Bonfigli.

Le Rotavelle

^
;

little

further

here the road

is

crossed at right angles by a path which undoubtedly follows an ancient

To

line.

the E.

it

follows the S.

bank of the Fosso Palamento, passing by the

remains of several ancient buildings


with two aisles (so far as
this

is

that which

Nibby

first,

{Sc/iede,

and as being constructed of opus

iv.

34) describes as

reticu/atuni,

arches in each of the dividing walls, and a

but

not, then

if

it

close to the path, a reservoir

could see) divided by brick arches.

has disappeared.-

in

having three

modern

The aqueduct

roof,

the

aisles
I

Whether

Vigna

Belli,

with eight

rather doubt:

of opus incertum and

Here a dedicatory inscription to Diana is said to have been found [C.I.L. xiv. 3928).
As Nibby's description of Le Rotavelle the district with which we are dealing in Analisi,
text of his notes {Schede, iv. 34)
ii. 534 is somewhat brief, it may be of interest to give the full
Passato il ponte
Giovedi 29 Maggie (1823) ci dirigemmo a Monticelli e Palombara (da Tivoli).
^

'

si trova poco dopo un rudere di eniplecton di scaglie di selce {infra, 151) quindi
una cappelletta ed un bivio ; noi prendemmo a sinistra benche la strada piu breve a Monticelli sia
seguendo la via a sin. vi rimarcai molti poligoni che per antica fanno riconoscere
la destra
questa strada, la quale sembra la stessa che come via antica Tiburtina trovasi descritta in Cabral e
Due miglia dopo Tivoli a qualche distanza a destra vidi
nella sua Topografia (/w/ra, no, 152).
ruderi di pietre quadrate di sostruzione sotto un colle {infra, 167) e \ miglio dopo altre rovine
pur di pietre quadrate sopra di un colle forse avanzi di qualche antica citla in questi dintorni
Caenina (?) {infra, 173). After describing his visit to Monticelli, where the only ruins of which
he could hear were those near Colle Ferro at Le Caprine {infra, 119), he continues:
scendendo verso Palombara, si traversa una macchia dentro la quale appena disceso il colle di
Monticelli circa un miglio distante dal villaggio dopo il lavatore cominciasi a trovare ruderi
antichi
quindi veggonsi avanzi di un' acquedotto di opits ntixtwit ed altri ruderi s'incontrano ad

deir Acquoria

'

'

ogni Iratto ora reticolati ora


sotto di

laterizi di

Palombara
essa vidi un frammento

poco prima

di

buona costruzione

{infra,

179).

Altri ruderi

Nella Casa Ferretti che e nella parte nord-est


di orologio solare

dell'

si

trovano

acropoli e

concavo, una testa di cervo, ed una iscrizione di

L F VELF;
BIS PRAEF^

iLBIAELLS-A^

The

82

British School at Rome.

Vigna Imperiah are Hkewise not to be certainly


recognised, though there are some remains of a brick building a little way

the brick ruins

S.

the

in

of the reservoir,

now ahnost

however, which he describes

in

The polygonal

entirely buried.

Vigna

the

Belli are

very short distance to the S.W., though, as

far as

are of limited extent, the platform which

still

remains,

to be seen there, a

could see or learn, they

saw, upon which the cottage

intentional avoidance of horizontal lines.

The supporting walls only


is apparently in some parts an
The blocks are finely jointed,

and the

measured was r30 m. long by

by

stands, measuring only 20-54 metres

34'i7.

stand to a height of two courses, and there

smooth:

faces are

the largest

74 cm. wide by 66 cm. thick.


Further up. the valley he apparently did not go

Two

remains to be seen there.


is

hundred yards

but there are other

to the E.S.E. on the ridge

a reservoir with a single chamber, and further on again the remains of a

platform in Cyclopean masonry of a

road apparently y2$ metres

in

villa,

width going on up the valley, parallel

but rather above, the modern path, which

Nibby, after leaving the Vigna

and the supporting walls of a

Belli,

itself follows

an ancient

returned to the line of the present

highroad and apparently saw parts of the crepido of the ancient road
in

situ

after

this

he says that

in

place

called

still

saw three

he went southwards, and

one some 90 palms (20 metres)

reservoirs, the last, a circular

to,

line.

in

diameter,

Unless the remains he has hitherto been

Martini.

describing are to the N. of the Fonte Grosso (which from the mention of
cui

mi presento

3929

'

il

propiietario solo la copia manoscritta

come

irovata a Rotavelle' (C./.L. xiv.

according to other authors here cited, the inscription itself was at Stazzano).
II Sig. Ferretti ci accompagno la mattina del 30 a Rotavelle luogo circa 2 m. distante da

Moricone ivi osservammo ruderi incogniti di reticolato non regolare,


un capitello ionico di lavoro grossolano di traverlino. Nella vigna
quindi passammo nella vigna Belli
Ferretti che la prima percorremmo fu trovato I'orologio solare
dove riconoscemmo a fior di terra mura di poligoni della epoca terza, cioe politi da tre parti, che
certamente furono recinto di citta rintracciandosene gli avanzi per un miglio almeno, forse Cameria.
Ivi dappresso trovammo una conserva a tre navi di opera reticolata con otto'archi la cui volta e

Palombara nella direzione

molti

altri rud(eri) d'

di

incertum

moderna, e un acquedotto d' incertum con canaloni. Nella vigna Imperiali si vede un pezzo di
Vi si veggono altri ruderi informi
opera laterizia che e ad angolo relto colle rovine preced(enti).
Dopo quesla uscendo e diriggendosi verso occid(ente) veggonsi avanzi di una crepidine
ed astraco.
di via che va da sett(entrione) a mezzo giorno e dopo questa seg(uendo) la direz(ione) merid;ionale)
trovasi un' altra conserva con volta crollata di un'

sepolta, e quindi nel luogo

palmi

di

dianietro

denominalo Martini

evidente

ivi

si

emplecton finissimo
vede il giro di una

un' altra se ne trova

pi.scina circolare

e Valeria'

(cf.

Aiialisi,

ii.

293).

90

vede Tandamento di una via antica della (]uale se ne puo


3"lO metres) la quale secondo la relazione de' naturali viene

si

precisare la laighezza a 14 palmi ( =


puo considerarsi come parte dell' altra e communicazione fra le vie Salaria,

dalla Flora e

dopo

di circa

Nomentana

Roman Campagna. II.

Classical Topography of the

the Vigna Belli and of the Vigna Ferretti


just

W.

into

some

of the highroad

seems

me

to

the latter

W.

to the

is

83
of

it,

be impossible) he has fallen

to

confusion, as the circular piscina

to the N.E. of the Ponte

is

Grosso.

The road on the S. bank of the Fosso Palamento continued, I was told,
The ancient road cut off the large bend made
on the W. of the highroad.
by the highroad

Ponte Grosso, descending to the

the

at

On

ascending again sharply.

its

edge are the remains of a

E.

the N. of which another path crosses

ancient

the fieldwall flanking

paving-stones,^ while just

stones

/;/

at

it

N.W. of the Ponte Grosso

situ a few years ago.

It

This path

right angles.

on the E. of the highroad,

it,

and

valley,

villa, just

full

is

to
is

of

saw some paving-

must, indeed, be the road of which Nibby

speaks as going towards the Fiora, and must before very long join the road

on the

bank of the Fosso Palamento, both

S.

Palombara

to the

falling

neighbourhood of the Osteria

point 105 {supra, 74).

Nibby

If

towards the Fiora, then the

right in

is

going

line

into the road from

Moricone a

di

little

N. of

saying that the road went

W. from

point

105 should be

ancient too.

105 from the S.

prolonged as
ii.

374,

commg

not unlikely, though not certain, that the path

It is

is

ancient also.

far as

In that case,

Monte Venere

to point

we may assume
Marozza

378, speaks of an ancient road from Grotta

it

Nibby,

or even Stazzano.

to

be

Aiialisi,

to Castel

Chiodato, Cretone and Stazzano, and would certainly seem to refer to this
line.

built

may

At Monte Venere

the prominent ruins of a

upon an ancient water

and traces of

reservoir,

be seen at three points further

itself

keeps to the

it

of the

modern road

presents no traces of antiquity (Gell,

known

as

Le

Pedicate, near

Orvinium and Regillum.


is

W.

it,

Roman

are

buildings

W.

Returning to the road to Moricone, which we


find that

modern farmhouse

left at
all

op. cit.

Ponte Grosso, we

Moricone

the way.
136),

though the ruins

have been variously identified with Cameria,

Of Cameria we have

with more probability to be sought

in

already spoken

Orvinium

the valley of the Salto, as Gell

and Nibby {Aiialisi, ii. 379) point out while of Regillum we only know
that it was a Sabine city, from which came Attius Clausus, the father of the
Claudian gens, so that Nibby's identification rests on insufficient grounds.
;

Above

it,

the terraces of

further E. are the remains of

Monte Madano

what appears

to be a church, to the N. of

which are

{siipra, 78).

The

84

The

British School at Rome.

Le Pedicate

ruins at

consist of remains of Cyclopean walls, shortly

described by Gell and Nibby and attributed by them to a city


given by the former, they seem to resemble those on the

from the maps of both writers

{supra, 78), but

modern
Colle Palombara it

are to be sought just below the


a

hill

known

as

from a sketch

Monte Madano

would appear that they

it

road, to the S. of the Convento, on

not clear whether they run

is

straight line or lines, or whether they enclose a space.

able so far to discover them, enquiries having proved fruitless


that

confess

have

Moricone, which, to

Campagna
district

in

thoroughly searclied

not

the truth,

tell

the narrower sense.

may

but

my

Nomentana N. of Monte

must

survey of the

by mentioning that the road going N.N.W. from Moricone

the prolongation of the Via

Roman

from the

far

conclude

neighbourhood of

the

somewhat

lies

in

have not been

Libretti

to join

no doubt

is

the concluding portion of the important deverticulum from Tibur to the Via
Salaria, part of
will

which we have already followed, while

be dealt with infra, 173

its

southern portion

just to the N. of Moricone

sqq.

it

passes by

the remains of a very large villa in opus reticulatum, with an open circular
cistern.

There are no traces of antiquity on the cross-road from near

Monte

this

except for the ruins marked at point 145, which


are unimportant foundations in concrete.
point to

Libretti,

Having thus completed our survey of the Via Salaria and the Via
territory through which they pass, we now
return to Rome, and take up the examination of the Via Tiburtina
and its branches.
Nomentana, and of the

VIA TIBURTINA.
I. From the Porta Tiburtina to Settecamini.

The Via Tiburtina


the gates of

distance

traffic.^

course, in no

is

one of the most important roads that issue from

Rome, carrying a

The road

way remarkable

On

is,

amount both of

local

however, until the

and of long-

last

part of

either for the beauty of the country

traverses, or for the difficulties

engineers.

large

itself

which have had

to be dealt with

by

its
it

its

the contrary, until the actual ascent to Tibur begins, the

road runs through a gently undulating and somewhat monotonous


For the division of the roads radiating from
British School at Rone, i. 127.
^

which

Rome

into these

two

classes, see

district,

Papers of the

Roman Campagna. II.

Classical Topography of the


and has no obstacles

The

twice crosses.

85

contend with, except the river Anio, which

to

it

ascent to Tibur, too, though fairly steep, presents no

The

problenris of engineering.

result

modern road has followed

that the

is

the ancient line pretty closely, and no deviations of importance are to be

noticed

have

distance

of the

two-thirds

until

neighbourhood of Bagni, where the change

been

in line is

traversed,

in

the

probably due to the

inundations of the sulphur springs, which, until they were carried to the

Anio by a canal (constructed by Cardinal Ippolito d'Este in the i6th


The Antonine itinerary gives the
century), ran unchecked over the plain.
distance from Rome to Tibur as 20 miles, while the Tabula Peutingerana

allows

(which

16

miles from

Rome

this station

and Tibur having

is

to the station

Rome and

between

Tibur

a forgery {C.I.L. xiv. 361

undoubtedly

should

No

fallen out.

Rome

Antonine itinerary has

The

14)

There

as

the

14th

positions of those which have been

and Tibur should


it.

to

milestones have been found

by many authors

given

discovered further along the road, however,


distance between

corrected

ad aquas Albulas, the distance between

that

*}.

be

it

necessary that the

have been 20 miles, as the

the

in

is,

make

group found

place, the

first

recently at the 36th mile, where the Via Sublacensis diverged from the

Via Valeria,

at a place

and the 43rd milestone

about 16 miles from Tibur

American School of Classical Studies


however, involves us

below

and

this

is

in

(A^ot.

Scav. 1890, 160),

also exists in situ {Supplementary Papers of the

considerable

one reason why

in

Rome,

difficulties,
I

i.

which

is,

Tiburtina

further,
left

The theory

of Fabretti was, that

the case of

in
in

by no means certain by which gate the

the city.

fact,

be dealt with

will

have not attempted

this road to indicate the probable positions of the milestones


It

This

108-140).

the map.

original

issued

it

Via

by the

Porta Viminalis, and continued the line of the Vicus Collis Viminalis for

some

distance outside the gate {De Aqnis, Diss.

he believed to be the later


S.

Lorenzo.

This view

is

line of the

road a

iii.

little

adopted by Revillas

tab.

i.,

ii.),

joining what

beyond the church of

{infra, 199).

Lanciani, on

the other hand, supposes that the Via Tiburtina turned almost at right

angles southwards immediately after leaving the Porta Viminalis, and, after

being joined
*

by a road from

Via Praenestina

S.

[?],'

Lorenzo now stands, turned

line followed

the

Porta

Esquilina (which

he marks

following Fabretti) at the point where the Porta

sharply to the N.E. again, taking the

by the modern road {Mon.

Line.

i.

476

Forma

Urbis, 17, 18).

The British School at Rome.

86

Hiilsen prefers the theory that the road from


referred

to

the original Via Tiburtina (Kiepert and

is

Urbis RoDiae, tab.

by any

for

though the name 'Tiburtina Vetus

i.),

classical authority

Topographic,

the Porta Esquilina just

is

only retained for convenience (Jordan,

the three, inasmuch as the arch erected by Augustus in

passage of the Aquae Marcia, Tepula and


{C.I.L.
in

vi.

not vouched

is

This seems to be the most probable supposition of

343).

3.

i.

and

Forma

Hiilsen,
'

]>.C.

for the

bearing an inscription

lulia,

1244) recording his restoration of them (which was incorporated

the outer half of the Porta Tiburtina of the Aurelian wall), points to the

importance of the road which passed under

it,

while

we

find_

the

that

straight road from the Porta Viminalis passed through the Aurelian wall

by a small postern, which was closed at some unknown period. We may


notice, too, that the earliest tombs which flanked the Tiburtina Vetus were
'

'

found to date from the beginning of the Imperial period (Jordan,

op. cit.

Lanciani's theory succeeds in accounting for the importance of

367, 368).

the Porta Viminalis, but involves two sharp turns within a comparatively
short distance
it

gives

tively

is

in its

while that of Fabretti, though the straightness of line which


favour {infra, 87), seems hardly consistent with the compara-

importance which his road seems to have possessed

small

The

imperial times.

the Aurelian wall


its

ancient

name

postern by which

is
is

immediately

situated

unknown, and,

in

the city after the erection of

left

it

S.

of the Praetorian

Camp

for lack of a better appellation,

it

is

generally called the Porta Chiusa,^ having been blocked up at an uncertain


date.

Along the

first

part of the course of the road various discoveries have

been made, the most notable being that of the


excavated
the

road.

in
It

the
is

Vigna Lozano-Argoli
a square

chamber

in

in

Tomba

della Medusa,'

1839, which lay on the N. of

opus quadratum of travertine and

contained three fine sarcophagi (from one of which

'

it

takes

its

name) which

block of peperino, built into the later wall which follows the line of the

Praetorian camp, and measuring

070

by 0*50 metre, bears the following inscription

VERI

IVNI
Nibby and Gell (Mura di Roma, 336) give

it

thus

NVND

N CEB
.

VER

-S.
:

wall of the


Roman Campagna. II.

Classical Topography of the

now

are

Lateran (Helbig, Fiihrer,

in the

deir

Accad.

Two

brickstamps were found

132 A.D.

Pont.

203

r,

x.

134

223

Bull.

A.D.),

Inst.

which,

1839,

tomb

the

in

471, nos. 703-5

p.

i.

if,

as

Jordan,

xv.

{C.I.L.

cf.

also Diss,

op.

105

87

392).

cit.

after

10

1,

seems probable, they belong

to

the inner facing of the vaulting of the roof, give an approximate date to
the building.

latum, which
hospital

surrounded by buildings of brickwork and opus reticu-

It is

the recent excavations for the construction of the

in

known

as the Policlinico were found to have mosaic

painted plaster on their walls.

and

made

403;

524;

1896,

tomb

opposite to the

(De
in

1899,

were

etc.,

1888, especially Not. Scav. 1889,

201; Bnll. Com.

1899,

century

C.I.L. xv. 7255,

Frontinus, curator

C.I.L.

vi.

839)

and further

7474

(this

pipe bore the

name

of the well-known

aqnarum under Trajan), 7612, 7657, 7666

Tomba

Medusa, the Vicolo

della

a branch from

{infra, 93), leads to the

it

dell'

Lanciani, Ruins

prolonged
it is

1872 {Bull. Inst. 1872, 68

and Excavations,

it

would

fall

almost at right angles from N.N.E. to


direction brings

Viminalis

is

it

into the

certainly an

1).

Osteria,

which

the

Porta

to

S.

line

Com. 1872, 6

Bull.

33).
is

not traceable, but

if

modern
Cupa {infra, 93), i.e. where it turns
The fact that this change of
E.
highroad near the point

into the line of the

joined by the so-called Via

interesting ancient tufa

the Policlinico the course of the road

Beyond

Urhis,

perhaps following an ancient

Vigna Querini, where some

quarries were discovered in


;

to the E.,

while remains

Forma

probably follows the line of an ancient road, diverges


Tiburtina

to to the S.E.,

the eighteenth

in

of baths were brought to light in 1839 and 1847 (Lanciani,

Opposite to the

Nearly

150).

the scliola sodalinm Serrensinm was found in 1864

the Vigna Rondanini, several waterpipes were found

where

pavements

Other discoveries of tombs,

since

130,

Rossi, Bull. Crist. 1864, 57

1888, 18

general

the course of the work, but are mostly of minor importance (see

in

Not. Scav. and Bnll. Com. passim


366,

new

straight line with the road from the Porta

same

argument

in

favour of the claim of the latter to

be regarded as the original Via Tiburtina.

The

question

is,

in fact,

considerable difficulty, and with the evidence at our disposal

it

is

one of

difficult

to arrive at a definite conclusion.

We may

now

return to the

Porta Tiburtina, and follow the line taken

by the modern road.

The Porta Tiburtina was made up

of two parts-the outer portion was

formed by the arch constructed by Augustus

to carry the

aqueduct of the

'

The British School at Rome.

88

Marcia, Tepula and lulia over the road, on the outside of which Honorius

added another arch and two towers flanking it.^ The inner arch was also
constructed by Honorius he restored the walls in 400 A.D.. as the inscripcompare the
tion {C.I.L. vi. 1 190) records egestis immensis ruderibus
identical inscriptions of the Porta Portese and the Porta Maggiore {ibid.
;

'

'

The meaning of this phrase is, according to Lanciani {Ruins


88,
89).
and Excavations of Ancient Rome, 73), that Stilicho and Honorius found
1 1

1 1

'

the walls almost buried under a mass of rubbish and refuse

had neither time nor means

to clear the rubbish

and as they

'^
:

away, they levelled

it

on

the spot, and raised at once the level of that strip of city land from 9
The thresholds of the Portae Flaminia, Tiburtina, Praenestina
to 13 feet.

and Ostiensis of Honorius are as much as this above those of the time
The whole of the inner arch was removed by Pius IX. in

of Aurelian.'

The tower on

1869.

travertine blocks

hand of the gate has

right

According to Nibby {Viaggio,

23381.

vi.

the

in

base some

its

from a tomb, one of which bears the inscription C.I.L.


\.

96; Analisi,

iii.

639) the

pavement of the road was discovered not far outside the gate in excavating
for the foundations of a church, and below it two earlier pavements
(cf.

also Lanciani in

Nibby

Mon.

remarks

Line.

i.

476).

besides

that,

the discovery

of

the

existence of tombs on each side demonstrates that the


cides with the ancient.
tion of the

that

it

modern road

pavement, the

modern road

Promis {Alba Fucense, 15) notes a


to the left about

coin-

slight devia-

300 yards outside the gate, so

some tombs, while pavingThe road then entered into

cut through the remains of a piscina and

stones were to be seen high up on the right.

a cutting through the tufa

here the modern road ran to the right of the

ancient, which kept straight on through the vineyards, being rejoined by

modern

the
is

reached.

tion of a

after

something

This account

less
is

than a mile, a

little

before the Via

Cupa

of considerable interest, since the construc-

new quarter has completely

altered the appearance of the

Tiburtina between the gate and S. Lorenzo,

all

Via

traces of antiquity having

entirely disappeared.
1

Platner (Topography of Ancient Rome,

I20) attributes the foundations

of

tlie

towers

to

Aurelian.
^

The

roads apparently ran at the old level, while these huge heaps of rubbish accumulated on

them when the rubbish was levelled down, the roads were correspondingly raised.
Mon. Line. \, 476, 'la via Tiburtina dei tempi di Augusto corre a tre metri sotto la soglia della
porta di Onorio, ed e fiancheggiata dasepolcri costruiti a bugna di sperone, e da colombai di maniera

either side of
Cf.

reticolata.

Classical ToPOCRAriiY of the

At some
Pallas, the

point

before the

Lorenzo are recorded

made when

excavations

Venturi, on the

uievi.

108

{infra, g2)

tramway

the

left just

13402-13414)

29,

vii.

viii.

6).

Aldroandi,

S.

while for those


mejii.

26;

In

the

be consulted.

Vigna
the columbarium of the Aurun-

station

outside the gate,

may

was constructed

was found, with many of the inscriptions

ceii

to

and Bull. Com. passim

136-138, Antichi Sepolcri, 99,

Bartoli, niein.

(Plin. Epist.

between the gate and the church of

in Not. Scav.

Vacca,

periods,

89

reached the tomb of

milestone was

first

freedman of Claudius, was situated

Recent discoveries made


of earlier

Roman Campagna. II.

in

still

the

in

situ

{C.I.L.

vi.

and 400 fragments of sculptures of peperino were brought

when the wall of the vineyard, as material for which they had
was demolished. The pavement of the road was also found /// situ,

light

served,

with tombs on each side of

{Not. Scai'. 1878, 346).

it

modern cemetery
gilding and painting

shortly before the

the original

is

little

further on,

reached, a marble sarcophagus, with

still

preserved, was discovered

{ibid.

1884, 42, 105).

The

original

of

basilica

S.

Lorenzo was erected by Constantine,

and enlarged and restored by Pelagius


Sixtus

II. at

the end of the sixth century.

a larger basilica back to back with

III. built

united by Honorius

III.,

who

it,

and the two were

The

also built the portico in front.

date

of the foundation of the castelhun at S. Lorenzo for the protection of the

church seems to have been the end of the 12th century


127),

and

not

the

9th,

as

Lanciani,

who reproduces

(^7///. Crist.

a sketch

1903,

of

it

by Heemskerck {Rttins and Excavations, 85), conjectures.


Walls are
shown round three sides of the church (not the E.) in the engraving of the
Seven Churches, published by Lafreri for the Jubilee of 1575 (no. 13 in
the collection which was once

Papers,

80),

ii.

and

traces

in

the possession

of them

were

still

of Mr. Quaritch
visible in

the

see

time

of

Urban VIII.
The name Campo Verano,' by which the modern cemetery is usually
known, is of classical origin, coming perhaps from the possessors of the
'

ground

in

Roman times

(Marucchi, Catacombe roniane

In one

(i903_), 300).

of the crypts of the extensive catacomb of S. Cyriaca S. Lawrence was

buried

('

venientesque

deposuerunt
for the

eum

in

in

praedium viduae Cyriacae via Tiburtina

Cyriacae viduae praedio

in

agro Verano

'),

illic

and a

site

Constantinian basilica was only obtained by cutting away the rock

and thus destroying a portion of the catacomb,

in

order to bring the

tomb

of the saint into


it,

British School at Rome.

The

go

immediately

inscriptions

right position in the church

its

apse (Marucchi,

of the

front

in

from

been

have

catacomb

the

that
o/>.

found

is,

cit.

in

the centre of

Many

313).

successive

the

in

enlargements of the cemetery, and have been arranged on the spot.


Many other discoveries have been, and are still, made in the cemetery
In Bull. Inst. 1869, 227, a road

from time to time.

described as having

is

modern ground

been found at a depth of 3-40 metres below the

level,

under the portico at the entrance to the cemetery, with a steep slope from
N. to S., and diverging about 30"' from the line of its smaller side.^
Beneath it ran a cloaca, in which were found tiles bearing the stamps
C.I.L. XV. 1234, 1346,

and a stamp (not more particularly described) of the

figlinae Domitianae, and into which drained the buildings on each side of
the road. Bull. Com. 1872-3, 21 records the discovery of a statue of Hercules

also found here; another,

ibid. 74.61, is

found outside the Porta

Lorenzo.

An

S.

interesting inscription

C.I.L xv. 7378 was


vaguely described as having been

The waterpipe

and a small shrine of Terra Mater.

remains of a columbarium (so a note

which speaks of the tomb thus

'
:

a maceria Caes[i]ae Paulinae


C.I.L.

vi.

Bassilli

'

in

Stevenson, Cod. Vat. 10565,

quod

est

{Not. Scav. 1890, 355

HiJlsen {Rom. Mitt. 1891,

36364).

among

the
36''),

f.

hoc moni[men]tum sive sepulchrum quod

parte laeva,

est via Tiburtina clivo Bassilli

what

that of Statilia Euhodia, found in

is

was once the Vigna Torlonia (now a part of the cemetery),

conclusum
Bull.

in fr(onte)

Com. 1890, 335

112) infers that the clivus

was a road leading northwards from the Via Tiburtina, but

this

involves the acceptance of the theory (see below) that the road found in

Campo Verano was


laeva may just as well

the

'

In Not. Scav.

the Via Tiburtina

and

it

would seem that

Cyriaca

S.

Pincetto, which

is

parte

be referred to the clivus as to the main road.

1877, 271

(cf.

Bull. Coin. 1878, 20)

it

pavement of the Via Tiburtina was discovered on the


catacomb of

'

is

excavated, crossing the

just N.E. of the basilica,

family to what was then the Vigna Caracciolo

is

stated that the

hill

point

in

which the

known

as

II

from the tomb of the Antonelli


:

and

in

Not. Scav. 1893, 519 the

would have Ijeen more correct, unless indeed the


But this is improbable, and it is most likely
that this is a portion of the road from the Porta Maggiore to S. Lorenzo, the pavement of which
was discovered in 1881 in a vineyard at a depth of 10 metres below the present ground level,
If this is so, the line of the road
C.J.L. vi. 22076).
together with a tomb (fiu/l. Com. 1881, 203
^

The

meaning

is

description

is

that the slope

vague
is

'

larger side

is

'

across the axis of the road.

not correctly given in Papers,

i.

map

i.

Roman Campagna. II.

Classical Topogkaphv of the


existence of a piece of pavement

is

noted

'

on the E. of the so-called

Caracciolo," in plot no. 93 of the cemetery,' which

91
"

rupe

would probably have

belonged to the same road, though the details are too meagre to enable
one to form an opinion, not even the exact direction in which the road
was running being given. In any case, no decisive proof is adduced that

more than a deverticuliim and it may be noted


that it is impossible to find any trace of an ancient road in the space to
the E. of the cemetery, between it and the railway, or, indeed, of any
ancient buildings a somewhat surprising fact, since this piece of ground

the road was anything

commands

a fine view.

the E. of the Villa


of a

To

the S. of the cemetery, however, and a

Rocco {Papers,

i.

map

i.)

are

there

little

to

scanty remains

which seems to have been a building of considerable extent.


In Bull. Com. 1896, 295, among the Atti della Commissione Archeovilla,

Comunale,

logica

it

is

stated that a large archaeological plan of the

first

portion of the Via Tiburtina had been constructed under the direction of

Henry Stevenson. The statement seems, however, to have been


somewhat premature, for though the framework of the plan exists at the
office of the Commission, no archaeological discoveries are shown upon it
the late

This

is

many

a real

misfortune, for the finds

solution had

we

MS.

notes {Vat. Lat. 10565,

one or two inscriptions from the

have not yet been published.

E.

9 Oct. 1878.

in

recent years have been

the whole of the evidence before us.

In Stevenson's

I.

made

and such a problem as the present might have been far easier of

first

f.

36^)

there are copies of

portion of the Via Tiburtina which

therefore give

them

here.

Vigna Venturi, 20 metres from the entrance

Christian inscription on white marble.

to the

The

92
2.

'

Campo Verano

British School at Rome.


presso I'antico magazzino sul Pincetto.'

D
SEX-CALPVRNIO

non

e in C.I.L.

GEMELLO
ecc
3.

fragment of a terracotta vase (perhaps an

painted on

it

in

with

olla)

letters

white
I

SVM

IVS

jXXX
found by Stevenson himself

in April, 1891,

on the

sion into a part of the cemetery between the Casale

may

conjectures that the meaning

years following
4.

On

in

the second

be. [ego]

then under conver-

hill

and Portonaccio.

sum

Ius[ti],

number of

line.

^J he gives the following Christian inscription

the

He

VPERORVM DEFENSO
OMES SVOS DECEP
D

PACE DXI KALIVLI


IVS REERICERET.

5.

On

f.

IN

ij^ he notes the following inscription from

reference to which

is

some MS. the

not clear

SEPTIMIVS RVFVS

MAGISTER- SYMMAE
'

Romae

e ruderibus erutis in vinea

secus viam Tiburtinam paulo

We may

also notice that

a casale called

quae

est sita supra

Vacca (mem. 108) records the discovery

La Marmorata,

the ashes of a

at

outside Porta S. Lorenzo, of a travertine

.sarcophagus with a vase of alabastro cotognino inside

far

Coemeterium

infra basilicam S. Laurentii.'

woman and some

of her ornaments.

it,

It

within which were

was, he says, not

from the place (on the Via Praenestina, outside Porta

where he puts the discovery of the forged inscription

C.I.L.

S.

Lorenzo)

vi.

3443a*.

Stern {Collezione di pavhnenti dassici a viusaico, 22) figures a pavement

from the Villa Brancadoro, outside the Porta


in the

Gabinetto

di pitture antiche at the

S.

Vatican.

Lorenzo, which

is

now


Classical Topography of the

Roman Campagna. II.

93

argument against the view that the Via Tiburtina passed


through the Campo Verano is the fact that, on the left of the modern
highroad, under the Vigna Gori, opposite to the Campo Verano, is the
further

catacomb of

Hippolytus, which, had

S.

it

not been divided from that of S.

Cyriaca by the Via Tiburtina, would not have had a

(De

Rossi,

puts

Z>////.

clearly

it

ypoliti

In

'
:

The Einsiedeln
Tiburtina foris murum.
In
sqq^.

1882, 11

Crist.

via

In dextera s(an)c(t)i

\sic\.

(now

statue of the saint

Laurentii

'

name

sinistra

{Mon. Line.

its

own

indeed,

s(an)c(t)i

44[).

i.

the Lateran) which was found here

in

of

itinerary,

is

The

important

as being a genuine production of Christian art of the 3rd century after

Christ (Marucchi,

of which

is

The

op. cit. 320).

casale

built

is

upon the oratory of

Crist. 1882, 52

Traces of buildings similarly orientated are to be seen to the


If,

indeed, Promis' account {supra, 88)

slightly to the
seen.
S.

N.W. of

N.W.

Lorenzo, has been widened

and a drain cut

fragments of brick
far

off,

the rock

in

now be

can

it

some opus reticulatum

be seen in the bank, and there are

the vineyard above.

in

in

still

it.

side of the latter, opposite to

recent times, as

in

may

of

S.

correct, the ancient road ran

is

the modern, though no traces of

In any case, the cutting on the

Not

S.

Marucchi, Catacombe, 339), the major axis


parallel to the line of the highroad.
It is marked C on map i.

Genesius {Bull.

the time of Clement XI., in

which had

a vineyard

belonged to the Piccolomini, but was at the time the property of the

Colonnese

family of

was discovered, and

travertine

palms

(2

Velletri,

feet) in height,

a sardonyx set in

it,

tomb with

a
in

it

containing

chamber

sepulchral

in

of porphyry about 3
bones, and a gold ring with

fine vase

human

upon which was carved the

figure of a Chimaera.

The urn passed to the Villa Albani (Ficoroni, Gemmae antiguae, 116) and
is now in the Museo Pio-Clementino.
The branch lane going E. from the Vicolo dell' Osteria would, if prolonged, join the Via Tiburtina close to S. Lorenzo
the line of an ancient road

is

reticulatum and concrete.

N. which Gori

{op. cit.

Beyond

this

little

way

73) calls the

antiquity are visible along

at

not certain.

On

its S.

but whether

edge

is

fall

into

line

no traces of

it.

again the lane called Via

its

follows

further on a lane diverges to the

Vicolo delle Mattonelle

Cupa comes

into the highroad

about the point where the road from the Porta Chiusa,

would

it

a wall of opus

{supra,

87).

This

lane

if

appears to

prolonged,
follow

an


The British School at Rome.

94
ancient line

the cutting

made

for

it

N.E. of the Policlinico

able depth, and paving-stones have recently been seen in


17

cit.

Gori,

loc. cit.

to be seen along

Forma

Lanciani,
it

it,

who says that


A

columbarium found

in

cf C.I.L.

(Promis,

The

Drusus, brother of Tiberius.


Sanguigna,' which

'

at the point

vi.

is

Those buried

33774, 33794)-

Vigna Nardi,

in

A.D.).

In the

along the Via Cupa, a marble vase

i>iei)i.

little

wife

of

Tor

the tenuta di

99, in Fea, Misc.

i.

Vigna
full

Here was

1862.

June,

sepulchral inscription Kaibel, I.G.I. 2134,

(Bartoli,

in

where

mentioned by

near the Vigna Gori-Fortunati along the Via Cupa,

is

was the scene of excavations


603a (about 140

op.

villas are

belonged to the household of the younger Antonia, the

it

XV.

it

have not been able to confirm

enters the Via Tiburtina, but not properly excavated,

Lanciani {Bull. Com. 1885, 108

of consider-

remains of several ancient

a statement which

Urbis, 4, ii).

is

found

and also the brickstamp

the

C.I.L.

Savini, on the right, apparently,

of gold coins was found in

1682

250).

further on, the highroad crosses the railway to Florence.

The

construction of the bridge led to the discovery of a series of underground

passages intended for use as cisterns, with vertical shafts ro3 metre in
diameter, and converted into a place of burial in the

them were found

five

first

century

B.C.

In

white clay pots, used for incineration, three of which

had the name of the deceased painted on them.

See Not. Scav. 1883, 171

Com. 1884, 54. A similar series of pots was found in


135
1732-3 near the church of S. Cesareo on the Via Appia {C.I.L. vi. p. 1103),
1890,

Bull.

in that instance the

but

name

of the deceased was inscribed upon a piece

of bone placed inside the pot with the ashes.

The discovery

of tombs a capaiina, in which the

C.I.L. XV. 408b, 730,

continued

till

tiles

bore the stamps

proved that the use of these cisterns as places of burial

the 3rd century A.D.

Other tombs of an ordinary character

are described in Not. Scav. 1883, 131.

Not

far off, several

fragmentary statues belonging probabl}' to the 3rd

century A.D. were discovered

{id.

1885, 159), while

also

some remains of walls


some tombs a capaiina formed of

904,

e,

the station itself

f,

in

tiles

which belong to the time of Trajan

The name Portonaccio


gate into the farm on the

('

S.

in

the construction of

opus reticulatum were found, and


bearing the stamps C.I.L. xv,
{id.

ruined gateway

')

1889, 367

belongs

of the road (which

Torlonia) and has been extended to the farm itself

1890, 15).

to the

now belongs

entrance
to Prince

Classical Topography of the

The

contains

it

blocks of tufa measuring

To

15 cm. thick.

25x9

and brick facing:

it

r25

cm., with courses of inferior mortar

the S.S.E. of the casale

iy6xyg

chamber measuring about

95

an embanking
site of a Roman villa
some ancient construction of rectangular

must occupy the

casale

wall to the S.W. of

to

Roman Campaona. II.

is

a reservoir

single

metres inside, with opus reticulatum


vaulted chamber beneath

stands high, having a

it,

which seems to have served merely as a foundation.


On the top of the hill, to the E., quarrying operations have brought to
light

and

measure destroyed

in large

At

opus reticulatum.

walls of

its

the

remains of a large

tomb, with a domed concrete

structure, apparently a

villa

with

eastern extremity stands a circular

The

roof.

interior,

windows and faced with


brickwork the entrance was apparently on the N. side, where there is an
opening about r8 m. in width, but the earth within is up to the level of

6"2

metres

in

diameter,

is

by four

lighted

slit

the spring of

its

0"9 m. in width.

arch

on the three other sides are rectangular niches,

The

outer, faced

thick, the

with opus reticulatum, and

buttresses about o-6 m. in width,

two walls

0"48 m.

is

09 m.

building has double walls, the inner being

It

07

m. thick

cannot have served

supported

by eight

the interval between the

both owing to

for drainage,

and to the fact that it is


some of the buttresses, and must have been merely for
The drum of a tufa column 0"5 m. in diameter, which lies here,
dryness.
belongs probably to the villa, and not to this tomb, in which there is, so
its

position well above the original floor level,

interrupted by

can be seen, no place for

far as

Further to the N.E., and

remains of an extensive

it.

not very

villa in

far

from the highroad, are the

opus reticulatum

\^'ith

tufa quoins,

much

damaged by quarrying operations two black and white mosaic pavements are still hi situ, though not cleared.
:

To

the S.E. again, to the E. of Casale Bruciato, there

which looks like that of a

The
The

site,

hill

to the

overlooking the valley of the Fosso Gottifredi,


is full

connected with them, so that parts of them

may

Roman

first

is

date,

debris,

materials.

a fine

one.

century A.D.

part of

it,

is

probably

be ancient.

construction of the fort on the right of the road,

to the N.N.E., led to the discovery of a large


to the

much

of pozzolana quarries, and a circular shaft with footholes,

S.W. of Casale Bruciato, and possibly of

The

is

modern building constructed of ancient

and splendid

some 500 yards


villa,

lying to the S. of the fort

belonging
itself,

was

The

96

British School at Rome.

excavated, and was found to be built in opus reticulatum

admixture of brickwork

without the

here was discovered the bottom of a glass bottle

Recently trees have been planted here,

bearing the mark C.I.L. xv. 6987.

and these remains have come to light once more in the holes that have
been dug for them a small portion of an arched chamber still remains
:

above ground.
of the villa was extremely well arranged,

The drainage
being

all

the rainwater

conveyed by shafts into a network of

and

collected

carefully

At

passages cut in the rock and lined with cement.

the bottom of one of

these shafts a statue of Apollo was found, while in the villa itself a male

draped

figure,

of the type of an Aesculapius, was discovered

(A^^/.

Scav.

1884, 43, 81, 106).

bounded by the highroad on the S., the


railway on the W., and the Anio on the N. and E., forms the Tenuta
di Pietralata, and contains extensive tufa quarries, some of which may be

The

tract

remains of antiquity are extremely scanty, though the

ancient, as
is

Opposite the

fine.

cutting

of country

made

foundations

in

may

S.

end of the railway station at Portonaccio,

connexion with

it,

are traces of a

villa,

site

in a

and remains of

be seen in the same cutting opposite the N. end of the

station {supra, 94).

About

a kilometre further to the N., on a

a small water reservoir,

This ruin

belonged.

but no trace of any building to which

lies

about a mile due

which appears to occupy an ancient


capitals of white

cm.

59

in

above the railway,

hill

site,

W.

it

is

could have

of the Casale Pietralata,

as there are at

it

two Composite

marble 33 cm. in diameter, a drum of a peperino column


and other fragments. On the S. side of the

diameter,

casale there are remains of a late concrete floor,

and

to the

S.W. the ruins

of a building in tufa concrete of the late classical or early mediaeval period,


in

which

By

it

would seem that reticulatum cubes have been used as material.

the farm road are the remains of a small water reservoir.

struction

of the

fort,

little

way

of a rectangular well shaft, 3"50 metres in depth

{N'ot.

Half a mile beyond the railway bridge, close


the

Aqua Virgo

some

quarries,

The con-

to the N., led only to the discovery

Scav. 1883, 172).


to the

point where

passes under the highroad, a road goes off to the S. into

which may possibly have been an ancient deverticulum,

as there are remains of a

however, no traces of

it

tomb

in

opus reticulatum close by.

further to the

S.,

and the tomb

is

There

are,

not perhaps too far

Roman Campagna. II.

Classical Topography of the

For the next mile and a

off to belong to the main road.

97

half, visible traces

of antiquity are wanting, but the line of the ancient road cannot have differed

much from

by the modern.

taken

that

1880

In

its

pavement

was

discovered between the 3rd and 4th kilometre at the entrance to the

modern road

35 metres to the right of the

notes' verso

il

mentioned by Martial, Ep?g.


arces

sacrum

dilectaque

Some

iugera

authors have taken


line

(cf.

'

i.

82),

The remains

19) attributes to

it

Revillas

ruine d'antico

qua
nemusque

Itur ad Herculeas gelidi


aquis,

rura

Musis signat vicina quartus ab urbe


urbs

to refer to Tibur, but this

'

a description of the

is

too closely.

12

i.

'

canaque sulphureis Albula fumat

Tiburis

le

Villa of Regulus the advocate

Near the 4th milestone stood the

sepolcro.'

second

{Not. Scav. 1880, 479).

miglio (moderno) osteria fabbricata sopra

fort,

is

lapis.'

unlikely

the

Via Tiburtina, and must not be pressed

of a reservoir on the

which Promis

left

have very likely disappeared

in

any case

{op. cit.

have not

seen them.

modern road diverges to the


new bridge, returning to the

Just before the 5th kilometre stone the


left

of the ancient, and crosses the Anio by a

ancient

The

about a mile.

after

line

runs straight to the Anio, which

it

crosses

ancient

now abandoned,
Ponte Mammolo.^ The

road,

by the old

name is doubtful in a document of 1030 A.D. it appears as


Pons Mammi, in another of iioo as Pons Mammaeus (Nibby, Analisi,

origin of the

ii.

It

578).

is

generally supposed to have had originally three arches, one

Promis

large and two small, though

two of equal size


being employed

Nomentano and

the

issued

and

damage caused

which had any

le traite
1

of a

On

by Narses

in

modern

qui y
its

it

had

travertine, the latter

the Ponte

after its destruction

or

artistic

institnec

Rome pour

fut signe entre le

S.E. edge, not

tomb with one block of

far

still

{Rapport

de

constater les degdts,

42,

is

interest

Affairs
'

Paris:

Ce pont

est celebre

pape Pascal

before the bridge

travertine

II

reached,

II. et

is

official

1849 to those buildings of

archaeological

et sur la voie Tiburtine.

The French

times.

the siege of

in

Nationale, 1850) gives the following account

Rome

and

was, probably, like

it

by the French Ministry of Foreign

milles de

that

20) believes

cit.

loc. cit.).

Commission Mixte

la

facing

however, been rebuilt

report of the

Rome

for

{op.

built of blocks of tufa

the Ponte Salario, restored

by Totila (Nibby,
It has,

it

was

Imprimerie

se trouve a 9 {sic)

dans

I'histoire

par

I'empereur Henri IV.

the rectangular concrete foundation

in situ.

The

98

British School at Rome.

Les Francais furent constraints


a rompre la seule arche antique dont ce pont est compose. L'ouverture
presente une longueur de i6 m. sur une largeur de 4 in. 50 (the total
width of the bridge, which Promis, loc. ciL, gives at 485 m.), et une profonla riviere servit a separer les

deur totale de
cause

le

cintre

deux armees.

Cette operation a
m. 45 y compris I'epaisseur du pave.
et la disjonction de cinque pierres en travertin, au

deplacement

de

I'arche

du

ou

cote

I'eau

du pont:

sort

s'ecrouler.

arches
period.

la

est evalue 4,000 ecus.'

now exists that on the right bank:


The bridge is a remarkably narrow
This

only 4-50 metres wide.

pourquoi

du pont ne vienne pas a


Only one of the side

restauration doit etre prompte, afin que le reste

Le dommage

c'est

is

it

is

of brickwork of a late

one, being, as

the normal width of a

we have

Roman

seen,,

highroad,'

but the bridges are as a rule somewhat wider, and Promis, noting that the,
bridges of the Via Valeria beyond Tivoli are 7-25 metres wide, attributes it

Among

to an early period.

the blocks of travertine employed by Narses^

on the side looking up-stream were two bearing fragments of inscriptions


probably from tombs one bore the letters [ L ] E N T V L, the other the
:

O N.^
Nibby {Analisi,

letters

mentions the existence of traces of an ancient


i. 457)
he calls the Marrana, near its junction with the
which
stream
a
bridge over
Anio, pointing to the existence of a deverticulum intended to give access,

and connecting the Via Tiburtina with the Via Collatina,


which, according to him, was also prolonged to the Via Praenestina, passing:
near Tor Sapienza. Close to it were other remains in reticulatum.
Traces of a bridge are in fact to be seen close to the point where the
to the quarries

Fosso Gottifredi and the Fosso Bocca

These remains
15

metres

thick,

di

Leone

join

and

fall

consist of a line of three courses of tufa

in length,

and beyond

adjacent to which

is

into the Anio.

blocks

about

mass of concrete 3-10 metres,

that again, projecting into the stream, another line of

30 yards further up are similar remains, probably belonging


wall of the road, which must have skirted the left bank
supporting
the
to
of the Anio, and have joined the Via Tiburtina slightly further W., and

blocks of tufa

just before
1

it

passes over the Ponte

Mammolo.

Uggeri, Giornaia a Tivoli, 15, says that he found the width of the road at various pointsand that it was the narrowest Roman highroad that he knew. Cf..

further on to be only 12 feet,


also infra, lOi,
2

14,

and, for a

much

greater width, 120, 124, 126.

Uggeri, Vues des Environs de Rome, vol.

showing the position of these blocks.

xviii. (Tivoli), PI.

IV, gives a view of the bridge,,

Roman Campagna. II.

Classical Topography of the

99

bank of the Anio, about 25 yards below the bridge,


some sort,
the Via
it
crossing
after
Shortly
the nature of which is uncertain.
Tiburtina turns from N.N.E. to N. by W. (at the turn are the remains of a
tomb) and then to N.N.E. again. The inscription published in Bull. Com.

Upon

the left

are three courses of blocks of tufa, forming a foundation of

1878, 235

n., is

have found

its

way

into CJ.L.

vi.

tombs belonging

to

it

are visible before

it

more of

tombs and the

its

Excavations were made


1878, 215

in

line of the

878,

Most of the

sgq.

it

passed

case

it

would

Strada Vecchia

W.

Via Nomentana

W.

built upon an ancient reservoir

W.

iii.

it falls

it

into the

Via Nomentana.

second

the villa which

W.

it

uncertain

is

it

it

in

the

where the so-called

would

fall

into the

probable, as
is

in

it

part

supplied lay to the E.^


it

merely a modern quarry road.

is

Com.

end of the

marks the road

of this road runs a track, keeping parallel to

diverging due

in Bull.

of the Casale S. Basilio, which


:

and

many

i.)

tab.

at the point

in the

or

be clearly seen.

The former seems more

road after the divergence.

the

may

and are described by Stevenson

Palombara leaves

appears to have kept just

To

itself

road,

the N. of this

or E. of the Ruderi del Coazzo

join the

di

To

inscriptions found belonged to the

S. Basilio until

running on past the Casale

Whether

road

Fabretti {De Aquis, Diss.

Republican period.

latter

Two

modern

crosses the

also on both sides of the cutting of the latter.

ifirst

does not seem to

it

the second turn a deverticulum diverges almost due N.

At
three

on the W. of the road

built into a wall

at

first,

but soon

In these quarries,

remains of very large animals were found {Not. Scav.

in 1888, the fossil

1888, 392).

The

road

described

by Stevenson has recently been destroyed by

Excavations made at S. Basilio by Castellani (apparently on behalf of Antonio d'Este,


Museum cf Mon. Sabitti, i. 225) in 181 1 are described by Guattani {Mem.
K\)\i\\di\Vigo{ opus reticulatum, decorated with paintings, and later on converted
encicl. vii. 83).
in it was a large sarcophagus, 13 palms long, 6 high, 6 wide (the measureinto a tomb, was found
ments are given as 15x11x7^ in Mon. Sabint, loc. cit.) (a palm is 0*2223 metre), very roughly
1

director of the Vatican

worked, within which were two bodies dressed in cloth of gold, of which Nibby (Analisi, i. 288)
marble cornice was found
says that the costume was thought to belong to the 6th century a.d.
and fragments of other inscriptions
and IVLIA
with the names

P'CORNELIVS

bore the
C.I.L.

name

vi.

161

of the %2.mQ gens

CORNELIA

among them possibly, as Tomasselti conjectures

{op. cit. 38, n.

i),

1 1.

Some way

to the E. of the Casale S. Basilio

building in inferior brickwork

is

the Casale Monastero, at which

is

a rectangular

and an apse at the end,


marble door-jamb and a

the interior, with a large niche on each side

A
measures about 8 by 7 metres the ceiling has quadripartite vaulting.
Foundations of other buildings may be
fragment of the cornice over the door are still in situ.
To the S.W. are the remains of a villa.
seen close by.
:

The

loo

some portion of

a quarry railway for

the cutting on

its

British School at Rome.

W.

side an arch

is

its

seen with a span of 1-23 metre, no

doubt a small culvert under the road, with which

The

angles.

section of the road itself

of large chips of selce

is

About 150 yards along

course.

is

it

is

also clearly seen

not quite at right


;

the bottom layer

about 25 cm. thick, and then comes a gravel layer

of about 30 cm. which seems to have formed its surface {pp. cit. 216).
Traces of the two different lines of the road as made out by Stevenson
can be seen at the N. end of the cutting. A little further on, to the VV. of
the road, the quarry railway has cut through the remains of a fine villa,
originally constructed in neat opus retiadatiun with tufa quoins, but restored
.

Below

are passages about 3 feet wide and 6 high cut

in

rougher work.

in

the tufa and lined with cement, which, as was frequently the case, were

it

used as water cisterns.

dolium found here bore the stamp

CVIDIV8
FELIX -FE

'
'

and on the edge was scratched

CN
Several

in letters

IN I A^f I

6 cm, high

(Cn(aei) (A)eliani

found about the ruins probably

were

paving-stones which

belonged to a deverticulum leading to the villa

On

described.

from the road we have just

the E. side of this road are remains of vaulted structures in

opus reticulatum and


In

?).

one of these

mounds which seem

to conceal other ruins.

tufa quarries, but within the limits of the Tenuta

two sepulchral inscriptions were discovered in


of M. Aurelius Asclepiades and Aurelia Salva
tombstone
1904 one is the
and a large number of their freedmen and freedwomen, the other is that of
M. Gavius Amphio Mus, a freedman of M. Gavius Maximus, identified by
di

Aguzzano

{supra, 53),

Gatti with a praefectus praetorio of that

name under Antoninus

held office for 20 years {Prosop. Imp, Rom.

ii.

p.

112).

Pius,

who

Both inscriptions

Not. Scav. 1904, 106, the second only in Bull. Com. 1904, 201.
are given
The Via Tiburtina may return to the modern road shortly after Ponte
in

Mammolo, though

its

exact course

is

somewhat

uncertain.

road appears

running due E. in a quarry just to the N. of the 7th kilometre of the


highroad
1

Rtill.

^
;

but, as the

pavement

sepulchral inscription discovered

Com. 1899, 262.

'

is

about

modern

metre below the present

in a vineyard near the 7th kilometre

'

is

level

published in

Roman Campacna. II.

Classical Topography of the


of the

soil, it

The width

excavation.

useless turn)

is 3-5

metres (12

feet),

which

is

without the aid of

below the average

identification would, besides, involve an apparently

main road (the

for the

in either direction

not traceable further

is

loi

and the section of

its

bed

is

complete.

Under

the paving-

stones of selce comes a layer of gravel 0-35 metre thick, then blocks of

On

tufa for about O'S metre, then another layer of gravel 0-35 metre thick.

each side of the road

beyond

wide, and

this

itself is

a crepido of large tufa blocks, 58 to

again a footpath, paved with blocks of tufa resting

on gravel, 3-40 metres wide on the N. and 2-25 metres on the

Beyond

the road there

60 cm.

is

tomb on the W.

side of the quarry,

S. side.

retaining

still

part of the facing of cement in the interior, and on the E. side a water
reservoir

and other buildings

the line of the road,

opus reticulatum,

in

little

Some

provided with footholes.

N.W.

to the

is

all

of which are parallel to

a puteus cut in the rock, and

of these remains must have been visible in

the time of Nibby, as he {Schede,

10)

iv.

notes the remains of a

tomb

between the 7th and 8th kilometres of the modern road. Revillas, too,
mentions a tomb on the left at the 5th mile, and so does Promis {op. cit. 24)
at

5:^

On

miles out.

the S. of the road are extensive remains of a villa in

opus reticulatum with tufa quoins.


In the field to the E. of the quarry
loose,

bearing the following inscription

saw a block of white marble lying

certainly a quarry mark

0'b\ metre

o'4 metre

OC

-R

XCIV
Cf Bruzza, Ann.

hist.

1870,

interpreted as R(ationis)

The number would


locus or
It

refer

no,

for

similar

marks.

If

ROC may

be

LOC(O), then we have rationis^ loco DXCIV.'


to the number of blocks already taken from the
'

compartment of the mine.

may

be interesting to quote Revillas' remarks on this portion of the

road.
'

Hinc (from

just

beyond

S.

Lorenzo) absque

ulla notabili

obliquitate

vetus recensque via simul contendunt ad Anienis usque pontem, quem

Mammulum
1

vocant .... Ultra pontem nonnihil sinistrorsum declinat via

{op. cit. supra, 66 n., p. 163, note 4) rejects Bruzza's interpretation, R(ationis),
R(ecognitum) as suggested by Dressel, who compares a similar mark on amphorae

Hirschfeld

preferring

{C.I.L. XV.

p. 562,

i.).

The British School at Rome.

I02

superstructus

antiquis parietinis alicubi

rudera haec

alterius aedificii

Nomentanam,

ultra emittebat in

non

declinabat,

Murus porro

appellant.

videtur,

sint, facile

magis adhuc sinistrorsum

via

La Vanina^

muris obsecundans quod

Fraedii

sed

an

sepulcrorumne

Vetus porro
antiquum viatrium paulio

est decernere.
et

Recens vero recta

ut arbitror, tendens.

tendens veteri iterum iungebatur ad alium pariter antiquum pontem sub

quo

Magugliani'^

qui

rivus

Anienem

proximum

dicitur ad

Distat autem hie pons duo circiter Milliaria a praecedenti quern

properat.

Mammulum

appellavimus.

Fabrettus

'

veterem viam non

Topographica

Tabula

in

nisi

de Aquaeductibus iuncta^

prope VIII ab urbe lapide recenti coniunxit.

quam

emendatiore altera

libro

in

Apologemate contra Gronovium

edidit,*

in

mox

viam [the

memorati pontis antiquitatem fortasse animadvertens, utramque


rest

At

is lost].'

It will

be seen that Revillas has detected a great deal of the truth, though

difficult

it is

road did not

to suppose that the ancient

taken by the modern until the bridge over the

into the line

fall

Fosso

di

Pratolungo

one would rather be inclined to think that they coincide from a point
Fabretti's original view is still
a little to the E. of the 7th kilometre.^
further

removed from the truth

to Torre Vergata
(p.

seems

while in his later

incorrect,

though

view, which

is

also to be found

in

map the

sharp bend up

the calculation given below

would seem that he held the


Torre Vergata is
Ameti's map.

109, n.) represents Revillas' final idea,

same

if

it

probably a tower just S. of the Casale di Pratolungo, but

on the

left

of the Fosso di Pratolungo, of which only the foundations remain.

name

'

vergata

'

means

striped,

i.e.

of differently coloured m.aterials.

bank

The

must have been constructed in bands


There seems to be no basis for the supit

position that the road ever ascended through the dip just to the S. of this
^

This

'^

is

the casale on the

Elsewhere

W.

edge of the ancient road, between

in his papers Revillas notes at the 6th mile of the

sotto I'osteria detta la Casetta de' Cavallari posta a

lontananza

rottami d'anlico luogo

'

(the reference

is

mano

it

and the

modern

river.

road,

'

Ponte antico

Vedonsi dalla stessa parte in


perhaps to some mediaeval ruins N, of the
diritta.

8th kilometre of the modern road).


'

Diss.

Cf. the

iii.

Tab.

map

i.

of the

Dorsum Praenestimim

et

Tiisciilanum added to the 2nd edition {opp.

p. 90).
5

fin

Cf.

* La strada
Eschinardi (ed Venuti, 1750), Descrizione di Roma e delF Agro Romano, 235
il
che non credo fosse dell' antica Via Tiburtina,
:

qua (Settecamini) h tortuosa, e arenosa,

vedendosi a luogo a luogo vestigi


side of the

modern

road, nor at

dell' antica via selciata.'

what

He

points, these fragments of

does not however

pavement were

tell

us on which

to be seen.

Roman Campagna. II.

Classical Topography of the

As

tower.^

modern road over


Simone)

Fabretti's

the

The

map.

this

which Revillas

is

the stream

smaller stream to the

modern bridge a small


would hardly have taken

of the

S.

Marco

the Fosso di Pratolungo (called also Fosso di

entirely modern, and that

is

carries the

which

to the ancient bridge referred to, the bridge

W.

of

it

culvert of
for

Roman

meant

103

is

clear

from

has immediately on
construction,

inferior

work.

Just beyond the Casale dei Cavallari, the ancient road ran slightly to

indeed in March,
the S. of the modern, following the line of the fieldwall
been removed.
recently
had
which
paving-stones
its
1905, I saw many of
:

To

the E. of the 9th kilometre the cutting

To

able.

the N. of the road on the

formed of

with a dedicatory

tiles,

elsewhere) to Sanctus
Library, Cod.

vi.

I.

Half a mile
extensive villa

cement,

point the

Silvanus according
f.

further,

sepolcri.'

on the

still

name which

He

to a

document

left

i.

in

the Chigi

no).

of the road, are the remains of an

At

preserved, but the rest has been quarried away.^

modern road

(obviously removed from

148 (quoted by Fea, Miscellanea,

coincides with the ancient.

on, the Osteria dei Settecamini


del Forno (a

inscription

part of a water reservoir, cut in the rock and lined with

still

is

205

hill

made for the road is noticetomb was discovered in 1656,

it

also notes the

is

reached.

Here Revillas

little

notes,

'

this

further

Osteria

also bears), rottami di marmi, segni d'antichi

tombs described

in

the text between this point

and Tavernucole.
of the road are extensive tufa quarries, which must to
a considerable extent be of ancient origin, like those on the S. bank of the

To

Anio

the

S.

(cf Papers,

i.

141).

The Torre S. Eusebio has at its base a number of slabs of travertine,


some rusticated,' some not, which come from a Roman building perhaps a tomb but are not in situ. A garden wall close to it contains a
-considerable number of blocks of tufa 62 cm. high, possibly taken from the
'

-same building.
1
There are, however, indications of paving in the bank of the stream, belonging to a road
ascending to the N.E. of the tower, which must have joined the Via Tiburtina at the loth kilometre.
On the higher ground to the W. and N. are the remains of other buildings.
3 The inscriptions C.I.L. vi.
1933, 13143 were copied here in the i8th century.
'^


The

I04

From Settecamini to Ponte Lucano.

II.

At Settecamini
diverges to the

British School at Rome.

left,

a road

known

running

in a north-easterly direction,

the Strada Vecchia di Montccelio-

as

The

more convenient

to describe at once.

through the

are an almost sufficient indication of

hills

demonstrated by the existence of the paving

by which

cuttings

/;/

sitic

which

its

it

will

be

taken

it is

antiquity, which

is

at a point rather over

two miles from Settecamini. For some miles the only remains of antiquity^ to
be seen are several water reservoirs, some of them of considerable

was somewhat scarce

that water

The

in the district.

first

size,

proving

three of these

close to the road, at intervals of nearly a mile, the second of

them

in

lie

the

Riserva dei Pisciarelli is a very large one, divided into several chambers.

Near the fountain half a mile

to the W.,

1830 an inscribed cippus erected

Nibby

honour of

in

and Kellermann

basin

probably

63 feet

in

of

Roman)

{C.I.L.

vi.

neighbourhood of
volcanic origin

depth, which

possibly of

is

307) noticed in

Calpurnius Dexter,

by
Two more
1368, 1485, i486).the Laghetto di Marco Simone, a

found at the same point were published

reservoirs are in the

Ser.

ii.

This and two other sepulchral inscriptions

consul ordinarius in 225 A.D.

Borghesi

{A7talisi,

in

about

Bid/.

Inst.

300 yards

1833,

64

diameter and

in

drained by an emissarium of uncertain (but quite

date, cut through the rock

on the N.

side,

and provided

with ventilating shafts the sides of which are walled right

down with

mediaeval or modern masonry.

Half a mile N.E. of the Laghetto, and close to the road, upon a
the Monte dell'
nymphaeum, constructed

called

Incastro,

there

was only directed


the window by which we entered it.
that our attention

in

diameter and constructed

latter

an

to

it

The

extremely well preserved

and so completely hidden

by some bushes growing round


interior

is

circular, six

metres

good brickwork, probably of the


half of the second century, with finely baked bricks and very thin

courses of mortar, so that

To

is

entirely below ground,

hill

buildings,

it

of very

was obviously intended

the N. in the Riserva dello Spavento are the remains o

and

to the

N. of

it

to

be exposed to

a water reservoir and of other

again a building with two square niches on each side and one at the

E. end, the arches of which have large impost blocks of travertine.

There are some blocks which


look like paving-stones in a bridge on the path which runs N. to Marco Simone, not far from these
ruins
but I have no certain proof that it follows the line of an ancient road.
^ They are republished in C.I.L. xiv.
3993-5.
:

Classical Topography of the

view.

Roman Campagna. II.

metres

height from the cornice, begins.

in

ated with plain white mosaic which

The window by which we entered


the cornice

decor-

is

in the centre

is

air.

on the S.W. and begins just above


round-headed, and about r5 metre high by 12 metre

it is

at the top of the arch

This roof

almost perfect

is

hole 0"9 metre in diameter which gives light and

wide

domed

brick cornice runs round the interior, and above this the

roof, three

105

is

is

white mosaic like that of the dome, but

window is a later addition.


window is an arched semicircular

the badness of the brickwork shows that the

Below the cornice on each

side of the

17 metre wide and 0*95 metre deep, decorated with mosaic representing tendrils intertwined in blue and green on a white ground. The
niche,

arch of each niche

constructed with ornamental bricks o'43 metre in

is

Between the

length.

removed) were fixed

niches

and the

On

the brickwork.

in

window marble

the N.E. side, opposite the

window, a large hole has been broken through the


metre

when

The lower

constructed.

of debris up to 4 metres below the cornice, and

out clearing

away

the earth, to say what

where the entrance


be excavated, as

To

building

is

to be

is

so

that

the site

at

nymphaeum

the

lie

internal
S.

side.

is

the

part of the interior

of the

level

are the

ruins

church or a donmsculta.

trigonometrical

point

119,

Roman

probably that of a farmhouse.


is

in

or

brickwork of a

To
are

the

N.W. of

the

remains

period

fragments

To

the

E.,

the Torraccio dell' Inviolata,^ which

is

close
built

brickwork.

may

be seen

side.

now following divides into


be ancient. One goes straight on for

kilometre further on, the road

two, and both branches appear to


'

floor,

The
tomb constructed of opus reticulatum and
chamber is in the form of a Greek cross, entered from the
The tomb was surrounded by an enclosing wall of opus

on the E.

The name

chwrcli of S.

is

impossible, with-

it is

reticulatum and brickwork, in which were curved niches, as

146

scattered about, but there are no traces of marble,

to the N. side of the road,

upon a

is

hoped that the building may one day

of a considerable building, apparently -^f the


of dolia and bricks

which

well worth exploration.

the N.E. of this

nymphaeum,

the

It

is.

it is

large mediaeval

wall,

and not faced on the outside, showing that the build-

in thickness,

ing was underground


full

(now

corbels

in

are

is a corruption of In Via Lata, the tenuta having been the property of the
Via Lata (Nibby, Analisi, ii. 157).

Inviolata

Maria

we

School at Rome.

Thp: British

To6

about a mile, then bears rather more to the

N.,

from the Lago dei Tartari to Montecelio not

From

station of Montecelio.^

round the foot of the


celio itself {infra,

goes

The

it

probably led to the

it

the

in

and

rock,

turns

way

little

N.N.E. are the remains of a

to the

trifle

more

passes below the casale of Torre Mastorta.

There are no traces of other than mediaeval work


a

E.,

turns almost due N. at once, then

other

through a cutting

N.E.

into the road

falls

S.W. of the railway

on which Montecelio stands, as well as to Monte-

hill

179).

to the N. again as

point

this

and

far

at the casale, but

villa,

while to the

N.

are two water reservoirs, the nearer a small single-chambered one above

ground,

now converted

into a stable, the further a large single

sunk

some depth

the

to

in

hill,

with traces of a

villa

chamber

on the hilltop above

Half a mile to the N. of the western one are insignificant remains

it.

upon the edge of a stream


the top of a

hill, in

the

(the

Tenuta

Fosso del Capo), to the


del Pilo Rotto,

may

which were probably the scene of excavations made

pavements

in

ii.

di Antichita e di Belle Arti,

pavements were discovered, the

245

metres),

and

in

1822,

when mosaic

366).

The excavations are more exactly described by

ground

of which, on

black and white, representing Tritons and Nereids, were

discovered (Nibby, Analisi,

Romane

W.

be seen some ruins,

pt.

i.

first

2,

10),

of which,

had only a geometrical pattern

P. E.

who

18

Visconti i^Memorie
tells

us that two

palms by

11

a black meander on

was not taken up, while the

other,

which had

(4

by

a white

Triton

and various marine monsters round him in black on a white ground (with
an additional rectangular piece where the threshold was, representing two
lampreys (' remore ') with an arrow between them), was removed to a room
near the sacristy of S. Maria in Via Lata, to which the ground belonged.
size

Its

Coppi
{Diss.
^

is

no

not

given,

doubt

Accad. Pont.

The

v.

become of it I do not know.


same excavations when he states
a few years before 1833' some rough

and what has

refers

212)

to

the
that

'

travertine quarries at this point are in the

main modern

the remains of a villa in opus

The reservoir has


from the next, but whether it had more
than two chambers is uncertain.
There are four arches in the dividing wall (which is 77 cm. thick),
the two central ones measuring 1 "23 metre in height with a span of i '52 metre, while the two side
ones are 99 cm. high with a span of i "15 metre
the chamber which is preserved measures 8*40 by

reticulatum with a portion of a water reservoir

may

be seen in and above them.

one gallery perfectly preserved, with the wall dividing

it

2 '89 metres,

and 2 '55 in height to the top of the vaulted roof.


A large mass of fallen concrete in the quarry may or may not belong
travertine column drum 66 cm. in diameter may be noted in the field above.

to

this reservoir.

Classical Topography of the


mosaics were found, which were

still

Roman Campagna. II.


near

preserved

Maria

S.

107

Via

in

Lata.

The remains now visible are scanty, but include a fragment of substructure with some extremely good brick facing
the bricks averaging
;

4 cm.

in thickness

thinner

brick

and the mortar between them


over

(just

stamp

cm. thick) which

'

to

the

tenuta,

Anon. Hisp. Chisianus

cited

(^(a'

'

II.

of

is

in

124 (Nibby, Analisi,


'

slightly

bore the

broken

these ruins.

ii.

cippus

365),
'

vi.

it first
it is

which

'

broken cippus

15030, 'in pilla

Andrea

in

a Bull of Calixtus

in

the

(cf.

and though

'),

a curious coincidence
justifies

'

marmorea cipo

Nazareno

appears

bears the inscription

It

means

rotto,'

S.

an old one, inasmuch as

more) that a

among

pilo

C/.Z,.

antiquo ubi est aqua benedicta

name

there

be unpublished.

The name of

the

found

CTOR HIC AN

which appears

cm. only.

name

hitherto,

is

nothing

(if

lying

still

as far as

know,

unpublished
m.

06

ET'MARCIAE-

055

CONIVG

Urceus '045

The

material

is

IB^

04

ET-MARCIAE-

057

SEPTEMB

[Patera]

white marble, and the lettering seems to

belong to

The fragment measures 42 by


cm. in thickness. The path going

the second century after Christ.

and

the cippus

W.

passing
there are

was about 52

of these

no

definite

ruins
traces

may

represent an ancient road

of antiquity along

its

line,

course.

On

cm.

S.

and

though
its

W.

edge are scanty remains of another villa, including a drum of a white


marble column about 66 cm. in length.

On

the N. of the Tenuta del Pilo Rotto comes the boundary of the

Agro Romano, which may here


ancient road

S.E.

in the

but the

(as

elsewhere)

partially

follow

an

only definite traces of paving-stones are further

Quarto del Capo

at the crossing of a

branch stream

and even

The

io8

they are not

British School at Rome.

They

in situ.

are of limestone, not of selce.

On

W.

the

bank of this stream are remains of an extensive villa a grey granite


column 50 cm. in diameter at the base still lies there, and three more were
:

seen here a few years ago by Mr. St. Clair Baddeley, but they have since

been removed.

Fondo
3925

To

In this district (on the Colle

Santavelli
all

')

were found

the

Cerino or Cervino,

inscriptions

C.I.L.

xiv.

nel

'

3920, 3924,.

sepulchral and of no great importance.

the E. of Torre Mastorta the

lying in the

field.

line inscription

It

r20 metre

is

(almost illegible

half of a white marble cippus

left

height; above the plinth

in

is

a four-

is

could only read

ENO

TYRAN

two lines). Above it is the bust of a woman (the bust of her


husband was probably upon the other half of the cippus), and above that
in the first

in

the

tympanum

is

To

an eagle.

said to have been discovered in

out to have upon

Numius
Chrysis.
in 1832,

it

the sepulchral inscription

is

mile

it

saw another

cippus,.

{C.I.L. xiv. 371 1) of

M,

Proculus, a silk merchant (siricarius), set up by his wife, Valeria

The cippus was seen

here or hereabouts and copied in 1831 or

and has apparently been

The road which we


and

the N. of

1898, but which, on examination, turned

lost sight of ever since.

Torre Mastorta continues to run N.N.E.,,

time almost parallel to the other branch, and only about half a

for a

N.W.

at

left

of

it.

kilometre from Torre Mastorta a brick

tomb

seen

is

ort

the S.E. side of the road, and a kilometre further on another, of which ovAy

The road

the concrete core of the walls remains.


to the
to

left,

and

Fonte Formello turns due N.

after reaching the

the village of S. Angelo, of which

{infra,

gradually trends more

we

shall

have

to

and runs

speak later on

186).

The road which we have been


{Romische Kampagne,

10) to

considering has been taken by Westphal

be the original Via Tiburtina, which, he

supposes, ran with this road as far as

and then followed

its

its

bifurcation near Torre Mastorta,.

right branch for a mile or so

eastwards, passing to the N. of the


the plain to the Ponte dell

'

Aquae

Acquoria

after this

it

(////r^,

152), after crossing

which

ascended a steep slope, and joined the other road at the outskirts of
just

below the

turned

Albulae, and ran straight across

so-called Villa of Maecenas.

He

it

Tivoli,.

maintains that the long

Roman Campagna. II.

Classical Topography of the

109

detour was necessitated by the impassable state of the plain before the

Aquae Albulae were taken

Anio by a canal

into the

and

on any

that,

other hypothesis, the existence of the Strada Vecchia di Montecelio


explicable, as

would have been

it

to Montecelio from the road from

this

to

to S.

all

a short deverticulum

Angelo and Palombara (which

Nomentana near Coazzo) than to construct a


way from Settecamini to Montecelio. He further argues that
reason why the Antonine Itinerary gives the distance from Rome

is

the

the

Tibur as 20 miles, whereas by the more recent road (the present

highroad which passes over Ponte Lucano)


to

make

in-

diverges from the Via

itself

road

far easier to

Rome

is

the

same cause the

fact

that

it

only i8i.

is

Tabula

the

He

attributes

Peutingerana gives the

Aquas Albulas from Rome as 16 miles, whereas


The inscription said by man}- writers to
have been discovered in the i6th century near the modern baths on the
highroad, which is taken by Nibby {Analisi, iii. 639) and others to be the

distance of the station ad


it is

only 14 by the highroad.

14th milestone,
^

is,

however, a forgery of Pirro Ligorio {C.I.L. xiv. 361*).^

Revillas in his notes

makes

= m.

the following calculation in canne of lO palms each

Distance by the modern road

...

...

...

...

18

modern miles = 667

2 "223.

18=12,036

Subtract the distance from the ancient gate of Tivoli to the eighteenth mile

106

...

11,930

Add i\\Q
Add the

distance from the Porta Viminalis to the Porta Chiusa

...

...

between the distance from the Porta Chiusa to the point of


junction of the ancient and the more recent Via Tiburtina and the distance
..
from the Porta S. Lorenzo to the point of junction
...
...
...
the ancient and modern road from Ponte
..4 d(f the difference in length between
...
...
...
Mammolo to Ponte del Magugliano
...
...
...
.,4aJ:f the difference in length between the ancient and
modern road from Ponte
del Magugliano to Osteria del Forno
...
...
..
...
...
...
Add the difference in length between the ancient and modern road from Ponte
difference

Lucano

to Tivoli (see /'9-a, 148)

...

...

...

...

420

...

...

...

178

J
>

^
J
^

160

-^

12^903

Divide by the ancient mile at 660 canne 4 palms, and the result is that the estimated distance
to Tibur is just over iq\ miles.
Most of the items to be added are, however, put at rather too high
From the Porta Viminalis to the Porta Chiusa is only 570 metres (nearly 256 canne),
a figure.
while the additions to the length between Ponte

probably excessive

and

finally,

it

Mammolo and Settecamini (or


me that anything ought to

does not seem clear to

and from the Porta


more recent roads (snp)-a. 87, 93).
therefore, remove our difficulties.

respect of the difference in distance from the Porta Chiusa

point of junction of the earlier and

S.

il

Forno) are
be added in

Lorenzo

to the

Revillas' calculations do not,


Duchesne {Lib. Font. i. 326, n. 14) quotes Bruzza's account of the church of S. .Severino, built
by Honorius L, iuxta civitate Tiburtina, miliario ab urbe Roma XX,' which he identified in 1883
as being i^ miles beyond Tivoli on the road to Vicovaro, precisely 20 ancient miles from the walls
Cf. Bruzza, Regesto delta Chicsa di Tii'oli, 95.
of Rome.
'

The

no

Desjardins {Essai

British School at Rome.


Topographie du Latium, 138), while he accepts

stir la

the theory of the existence of the two roads, holds the reverse of Westphal's
view as to their comparative antiquity. Nibby {loc. cit.) places the point of

divergence between the older and the more recent road in the neighbourhood of Casale Martellona, four miles or more along the modern road beyond

many

Settecamini, and

He

other writers have taken this view.^

states that

and Cabral and Del Re {Delle

Ville

is

not a

the road can be traced across the plain,


di Tivoli, 45) mention the existence of paving-stones of selce (which
the district) to the N. of the

material found in

Lago

della Regina.

have not been able to trace them, though there are a few (not in situ) a
W.^ There are also a few paving-stones (not in situ)
little to the
about

to

miles

the

portion of the path

from

less

which flank

fieldwalls

Ponte delle Vigne to

the

Acquoria (cf Nibby, Schede,

must represent more or

the

in

E.,

iv.

34, cited

the line that

supra, 81, n.

the

eastern

the

Ponte delF

2).

This path

would have been taken by a

existed from the Lago della Regina to the


Westphal admits that no traces of his primitive
Via Tiburtina' are visible, while Canina {Edifizi, vol. v. p. 106) asserts
that the baths of the Aquae Albulae (the so-called Bagni della Regina)
were reached by a deverticulum from the 13th mile of the (present) Via
Tiburtina, which followed more or less the line of the modern road toand that this road
Montecelio,^ and had only recently been destroyed

road supposing

that

it

Ponte deir Acquoria.

'

could not be traced beyond the

Lago

della Regina.

His view

is

that

'

la

sempre passata per il Ponte Lucano.' It is noticeable that


a little before
11'') says, 'on the way to the baths.
Nibby
led
to the baths,
which
road
ancient
reaching the casale the traces of the

via Tiburtina e

{Schede,

and probably

is

iv.

the original Tiburtina, are seen.'

the statement of Cabral and del

Re

This does not agree with,

as to the existence of a road to the

N. of the lake, which they suppose to have run thence straight to the Ponte
Of such a road no traces are, as a matter of fact, to be seen ;
deir Acquoria.

and repeated

at least, after careful search


to discover any.

This

may

enquiries,

be explained by

have been quite unable

the fact that the

formation

1
Among them is Ansaloni (the author of an unpubUshed work on Tivoli, the MS. of which is
preserved in the Jesuit college there), who wrote in 1791 (i. 241-243).
- It is just possible that these may have belonged to a road from the Lago della Regina to

Ponte Lucano (see infra, 126,


3

n.

i).

Canina's plan {Edifizi, vol.

modern

road.

vi.

tav. 120)

shows

it

as running 500 yards to the E.

of the


Roman Campagna. II.

Classical Topography of the


of

much

of the travertine that overspreads

the

plain

iii

comparatively

is

recent.

We may

The

return, then, after this long digression, to Settecamini.

seems here to have left the modern slightly on the right,


passing to the S. of the remains of what is apparently a large tomb,
orientated N. and S. a concrete structure consisting of an oblong chamber
ancient road

entered from the N. end, having

five niches.^

vaulted structure of concrete, facing N. with

through which the modern road passes

Promis apparently took


with opus

mixtum

modern road

{op. cit.

for a

it

little

further

is

another

in a cutting."^

nymphaeum, and saw


he

24), unless

on

back against the rock

its

is

that

was faced

it

referring to the ruins S. of the

at the 13th kilometre.

Just to the N.E. of the 12th kilometre the cutting of the ancient road is

and before very long the

clearly seen,
it

is

fine

cippus C.LL.

vi.

34217

is

reached

lying in the field just on the S. edge of the line of the road.

Further on there

a curved cutting through a

is

somewhat higher

hill

though there seems no reason why the cutting should not have been made

on

straight

the N. side of which there

From

square tomb.
road, which

it

reaches a

antiquity are to

is

the concrete core of a lofty

this point the road turns E.S.E. to rejoin the


little

before the

insignificant remains of

No

14th kilometre.

be seen along the course of the

opus reticulatum on the

S.,

latter,

just

modern

remains of

except some

W.

of the 13th

W.

of the path

kilometre.

About a kilometre

to the S. of the road, a little to the

from the Osteria delle Capannaccie to Casale Rosso, are the ruins of a
square structure, probably a tomb, in brickwork of a not very good period

measures 575 metres square inside, and at each angle are buttresses
it
88 cm. square to take quadripartite vaulting. At the S. end is a small
walled space, built in opus mixtum, as long as the
I

-07

m^tre

width

in

above ground

way

to an

A little

level

whether

is

its

uncertain

side

itself,

but only

and back walls were ever carried up


the opening of a stair-

may have been

it

underground chamber.

way

to the E. of this, a kilometre E.S.E. of the Osteria, a

1
Promis {op. cit. 24) describes it as having
measurements as 5-97 by 3*05 metres.

cutting

kilometre,

tomb

existing

to

the

S.

of the

six

perhaps

modern

road,

does not appear to be of ancient origin:

kilometre, where

it

cannot be other than modern.

counting the entrance

and

parallel to

a similar one

it,

may be

and

tomb

gives

close to the

its.

nth

seen at the 13th

The

112

British School at Rome.

with the interesting inscription of L. Plotius Sabinus was found


{iVot.

Scav. 1890, 36; Bull. Com. 1890, 103

Rojn. Mitt. 1890,299; C.l.L.

The tomb

up again.
in

Still further to

the

chamber 675 metres square, constructed


and the inscription was cut
of marble which formed the front of the sarcophagus.
consisted of a

close to the Anio,

S.,

sepulchral inscription C.l.L.

the

31746), and ahnost immediately covered

\n.

brickwork, with a white mosaic pavement

upon a large slab

1890

in

Rendiconti Lincei, 1890, 195

Casale Rosso, where until recently

is

36408 was preserved (cf

vi.

Scav.

A'ot.

1901, 328).

On

the

way back

to the highroad, a little to the E. of the path,

water reservoir raised upon a vaulted substructure, and near


belonging probably to the

The westernmost
line of

villa

which

a well-marked cutting
at the top of the

hill,

which seems

many fragments

mediaeval days.

to stand

upon the

The

site

at the Casale del

of an ancient

a very fine one

site is

Latium cannot be

but the neck by which

One would expect

villa,

that

said
it

is

that even in

was a bridge over the Anio not

have ever been discovered, as


probably have swept them

The

S.

as

it

Cava-

contains

it

was one of the

there are no traces

joined to the land on

not a very wide one, and the place was certainly occupied in

earlier, there

i.

in

end of the Casale del Cavaliere through

of marble columns and a fine piece of a small frieze of

artificial fortification

Papers,

the

can be traced descending

and there are a great many

fortified villages of primitive

is

but which

a few paving-stones are to be seen in the fieldwall

bucrania and foliage.

the N.

supplied.

an ancient road of which no traces are preserved hereabouts

an E.S.E. direction towards the

of

it

a small

of the two tombs just mentioned was perhaps on the

country being open pasture land

liere,

it

is

loose bricks,

far as
all

away

know
in

Roman

far off;

and

times,

if

not

but no traces of

indeed

the changes of

the river
its

it

would

course (see

146).

lane leading from the Casale del Cavaliere to the highroad does not

show any

traces of antiquity

on the W, of

it

are the debris of an extensive

building of brick and opus reticulatum (to the N. of the house at point 58 on
the map), and to the E. of

it,

opposite this house, more debris, and a concrete

under the house to the E.S.E. while lower down, on the E. of a stream
which joins the Anio to the E. of the casale, are the remains of vaulted

floor

substructures in concrete.

The

cutting descending E. from the casale

is in all

probability ancient,


Roman Campagna. II.

113

paving-stones at the casale

itself,

Classical Topography of the

we have

and, as

though none

seen, there are

On

in situ.

many

reaching the bottom of the valley

and traversed a very clearly marked


the

on the W. of the railway.

hill,

turned N.E.

it

metres wide, through

cutting, 3*5

not impossible that a branch from

It is

Lunghezza joined it at this point a track may be seen descending N.E.


from Lunghezza which would easily fall into its line, and this is certainly
the best place for crossing the Anio.
it

After passing through the cutting

cannot be traced any further, as the Anio valley

On

N.W.

the

side of the railway, a

on a projecting mound, and close

to

of alluvial

is full

further on,

little

is

a mediaeval tower

Roman

a water reservoir of

it

soil.

date

a single chamber cut in the rock, lined with brickwork and vaulted over.

Two
which

long parallel concrete walls on the western slope of the

still

with the

villa

which was supplied by

rock-cut drain at the

N.W. angle

this reservoir

to indicate that the

villa.

Via Tiburtina, we may note that Pirro Ligorio

Returning to the

tombs

{Bodl. Canon. 138, f 117) describes an interesting discovery of

neighbourhood of the 9th milestone

Roma

portare in

quale era per


miglia,

e caualcato

che

si

one of

but the existence of a

mound seems

of the

upper portion was also occupied by the

nil

hill,

retains traces of opus reticulatum, belong to a platform connected

il

la

un

altro leone

medesima

quale leone

da un putto)

facessino

et chi

la
la

in his

et di

day.

un

'

Hauemo
il

quale e tanto ruinato, che no

si

la

Mammolo

ponte

uedemo, con una figura accanto

il

marmo,

altro sepolcro di

(Tiburtina) passato

uia

the

in

uisto hoggidi

di

huomo

(et

puo giudicare

uole ueder potra uederlo dinanzi alia casa de

Porcari.-

Non molto

lontano doue

leuato, et

condotto a

Roma

leuato

fu

Boario

nel foro

il

detto leone, fu anchor

un coperchio

un altro

di

sepolcro, et nel detto foro fu tagliato a pezzi dalla gnoranza dell' huomini,
il

quale era con dui fastigi tutti due intagliati

magior

XX

palmi, et

nell' istesso

minor

marmo

il

quale

Era

era per

il

tutto

detto coperchio cinto di cornice, et lauorato a guisa di un tetto che

il

lato

il

lato

era di

palmi.

pioue da due banne (bande?), et in ciascuno degli quattro angoli, haueua

una Acroteria

o'

uer posamento di statua.'

Shortly after the modern road rejoins the ancient


of a
^

tomb on
He

has just

the N. of the road


been speaking of the

to

relief

the S. of

of a

lion

it,

we reach
'

in

loco

from a tomb near

the remains

nuncupato
Ponte

{infra, 141, n.).


^

See Lanciani, Storia degli Scavi,

i.

115.
I

Lucano

^^^''-

114

i^i-^iTisii

School at Rome.

some distance
3652 was copied in
off, but the tenuta runs up
the
1733, and about five hundred yards further on the right we see
remains of the church of S. Symphorosa, which was excavated in 1878.
il

viam quae ducit Tibur' (the casale

Cavaliere, iuxta

is

to the road), C.I.L. xiv.

1879, for a

full

Basilica di S. Sinforosa in Gli Studi in Italia, 1878-

La

(See Stevenson,

description of the results attained.)

found hereabouts

in

1737.

now converted

tomb,^

dwelling

into

C.I.L.

and we next

3915 was

xiv.

on the same side

on,

further

little

is

through a

pass

where remains of the ancient pavement of the road (noted by


To
Promis, op. cit. 24, as 4 metres in width) may still be seen.'^

cutting,

the

water cisterns cut

here.

has disclosed the foundations of

recent quarrying

S.

little

in

Mammoth's

the subsoil.

way beyond

account both of

name

its

part of the

modern

is

'

tabernuculae

Dyania),

who

virorum

et

nobilis

Romani.'

as mythical as the inscription

an ancient

Coppi

site.

an ancient reservoir was

Of

this

it

Ligorio {Taur.

416).

itself

'

servatur in aedibus

in

probability occupies

all

{Diss. Accad. Pont.

v.

but the walls are

marble, and selce, and there are

full

of fragments of brick,

blocks of marble, including a

several

cornice and a square pilaster capital, the latter 58 cm. in width.

of

the

castle

are

several

225) that

existence there, and in use as a storehouse.

still in
;

160*, says

quite likely that the statues are

is

indeed

states

could hear nothing

It

but the building

vi.

'aliquae statuae togatae et palliatae

mulierum,' and that the inscription

Maffei

Achillis

i.

invented the forged inscription C.I.L.

that there were discovered with

and of the

')

now no longer visible) beneath


way to the N.E. is situated the

is

little

large mediaeval Castell' Arcione (Nibby, Analisi,


7, s.v.

situ,

as an ancient site

to be regarded

(obviously

building.

found

the Osteria delle Tavernucole, which

(which

existence of ancient concrete

were also

teeth

with

villa,

another piece of ancient paving in

is

and a few hundred yards further is


according to Nibby {Schede, iv. 10)
on

unimportant

ruins,

and

S.

of the

To

the E.

highroad

a water reservoir.

Beyond Le Tavernucole
of

the ancient

road

are

is

another cutting,

visible.

Gori

Revillas notes the existence of another, further

Revillas saw the crepido as far as

has been entirely rebuilt since his day.


courtyard of the Osteria.

still

of the

{Archivio

on the same

Storico

di

Roma,

side.

The bridge he
paving-stones now

Le Tavernucole.

Many

which further traces

in

notes as ancient,

but

it

serve as the floor of the

Roman Campagna. II.

Classical Topography of the


iii.

324) notes

the

inscription,

was discovered

deceased,
1899,

kilometres

17th

with

urn

cinerary

pavement was here ySo metres wide. Between


of the modern road a small marble

the

that

and

i6th

387).

little

1899 (Bu//.

in

way

Promis {Alba Fucense,

containing

still

W.

the

to

the fragmentary inscription C.I.L.


1869.

115

xiv.

who

26),

of

ashes

the

Com.

1899,

263

the

17th

kilometre

of

3916 was seen

the

Scav.

Not.

stone

a fieldwall in

in

gives the text in a slightly different

form, adds that it was found both upon a cippus i"635 m. high and
Between the nth and 12th
a marble epistyle 0"636 m. high.
miles of the modern road near Castell' Arcione the tombstone of
lulia

Stemma

Nibby

{C.I.L.

Viaggio,

i.

20691) was

vi.

104)

saw

found

when,

we do

Here were

standing by the road.

it

discovered the objects described in the following passage of the

on the temple of Hercules at Tibur

Revillas' chapter

know

not

(f 3)

also

MS. of

Et dum haec scribimus, inter xi et xii Viae Tiburtinae ab urbe


lapidem marmorea quaedam effossa sunt fragmenta, inter quae columnae
'

rubro

colore

frustum,

variegatae

proferemus {C.I.L.

xiv.

quam

epigraphes,

sepulcralis

tandem cippus, seu ara

3647) ac

infra

sic inscripta

VICTORI

HERCVLI

exscripsi.'

SACRVM
Dessau

{C.I.L. xiv. 3549) has confused this inscription with another

TIBVRS

HERCVLI

SACRVM
according

which,

Columna

'

(f

i),

was

annum 1724

legebatur

'

(cf

notes

it

first

as

'

was communicated to
in

marmorea

1738' {Vettis Latium,


Revillas'

'

dum

x.

in

referente mihi

Sched.

Berol.).

Agri

'

non Tibur
It

we

get

this

is

last

Tibiirtini Topographia.

Volpi also by Paolo

156), so that
'

Carmelitarum

quo,

himself]

columella eruta ex agro

haec scribimus

'sub

it

inscription which he figures in his Diocesis et

The

found

...

[he did not apparently copy

perspicue

Tiburs

sed

Revillas

pavimento, circa

Ecclesiae

Paullo

to

Colonna

he

Tiburtino Ann. Sal.

an approximate date for

which, however, may

go down even to
I

The British School at Rome.

ii6

was found at that date


{Herailis Fanum,
4).

July, 1739, for he says that C.I.L. xiv. 3545

BeroL),

'

nobis itidem haec scribentibus

Both Revillas and Volpi seem

to

'

{Sclied.

f.

have been at work at the same time,

but independently, for neither mentions the other,^ though both acknowledge the help of Paolo Colonna.

The promised copy of


pedalis quadratus, et

3647
coronice adornatus

At

the

the scrub

in

to

3914

is

the right,

built

upon a desolate

plain,

was also found

it

which

at this

{supra,

left

Anio.

the
1

10),

ibid.

till

the

3917

emerges,

point

has traversed up

down towards

now, and

by the Aquae
3918

C.I.L. xiv.

some

writers place

of divergence between the original and the later course

of the Via Tiburtina.^

(lapis) tri-

'
:

the Casale Martellona

is

road,

As we have noted

here.

20

atque ad saepius memoratt

covered with the deposit

Albulae, which slopes gently

here the point

f.

into the wall of the casale

the S. of the

from the undulating pasture land which


enters

given on

is

translatus, sic absolutissimis literis inscribitur.'

17th kilometre, on

inscription C.I.L. xiv.


lies

Columnae aedes

Paulli

C.I.L. xiv.

On

the

left

of the road are the remains of a

villa.

mile to the N., to the E. of the Casa dei Bifolchi shown in the map,

the Casale di Torre dei Sordi, which occupies a


the

No

hill.

there are

traces,

some

commanding

is

position on

however, of any ancient building can be seen, though

architectural fragments in the courtyard, the provenance of

On the N. edge of the highroad


400 yards further on are the remains of a tomb, by which are pavingwhich

however, quite uncertain.^

is,

stones of the ancient road appearing in the modern, and from this point to
the deviation of the road to Montecelio the two

seem

to coincide almost

modern and making


Near the small dried-up Lago dei

absolutely, the ancient running on the S. edge of the

same sharp bend

the

as

it

does.

Tartari are remains of uncertain date,

man

among which an

imperfect statue of

clad in a toga, of moderate execution, was discovered in

1827

while to the S. of the road are the scanty remains of an extensive


attributed to
op. cit.
'

72

M. Pedonius on very uncertain evidence (Cabral and

villa,

del Re,

cf C.I.L. xiv. 357*).

The only exception is when Revillas quotes


The modern road is probably slightly to the

Volpi's reading of C.I.L. xiv. 3554.


S. of the ancient line here (Bulgarini, Notizie di

Tivoli, 132 iniC).


^

In the tenuta of Tor dei Sordi, or else in that of Lunghezza, was found the Greek metrical
inscription published by Grossi-Gondi, // teiiipio di Castore e Polluce siil Tuscolo

sepulchral

(1901), 17.

Classical Topography of the

At

this

117

modern road to MonteceHo diverges to the N.,


the W. of the Aquae Albulae and skirting the edge of

point the

passing a Httle to
the plain until

Canina

Roman Campagna. II.

reaches the railway station of MonteceHo.

it

According to

more or

{Edifizi, v. p. 106, note 7), this road corresponds

with

less

an ancient road to the Aquae Albulae {supra, no).

The Aquae Albulae (see C.I.L. xiv. p. 435) lie about a mile to the
N. of the highroad. The water is bluish, strongly impregnated with
sulphur and carbonate of lime, and

There are two lakes

75" Fahr.i

Lago

Colonnelle and the

diminishing

On

on the banks.

della

owing

size

in

W.

the

in

at

rises

which the water

Regina both

amount
of the Lago

to the

side

of

about

Lago

delle

temperature

rises

the

of which are continually

of deposit
della

left

by the water

Regina are considerable

remains of a large building, which is variously called the Bagni di Marco


Agrippa or the Bagni della Regina Zenobia, neither of which names rests
upon any real authority. A plan is given by Canina {Edifsi, vi. tav. 120

cf.

Edifiziv. 105, Bull. Inst. 1855, 33).


a large square courtyard with a round building at each corner,
subterranean chambers within its area between it and the lake are

There

and

is

of coarse white

considerable portions

beneath

it

are other subterranean

mosaic

chambers

pavements

in

situ,

and

the brickwork with which the

concrete is faced is coarse and probably belongs to a rather late period.


Excavations have been made here at various periods. Bacci - {de

1568, 93), writing in 1550, describes these ruins and


excavations by Vincenzo Mancini of Tivoli, and also the

Aquis Albulis,

ed.

ii.

mentions some
removal of columns of verde antico, some to the Villa Papa Giulio by
Two
Julius III, others to the loggia of the Palazzo Farnese by Paul 1 11.^
1

Strabo

His account

The following account

11, p. 238) calls

(v. 3.

is

it

cold like that of the

Aquae Labanae

{supra, 71).

reprinted in Gioru. Accad. Ixxi. (1837), 61 sqq.


of

the state of the building towards the end of the i6th century

niagnanima et Regal fabrica fatta da Cesare Imperalore


le Accque passauano
Accque da cinquanta passi
Ordniato
dal Luogo oue risorgono per Aquidolto sotto la Terra, e si conduceuano al d Luogo
con gran disegno et Artifitio con le sue stufe, et scali di diuersa fattura con Pauimenti di musaico
adorni con con un Teatro ricinto intorno di un Ordine di Bellissime Colonne di Breccia uerde le
Palini grosse
quali sono (f. 104) tanto in prezzo con statue di marmo diuerse, Le Colonne sono da 30

may

not be without interest

Augusto

la

quale

si

(f.

103^) 'la

ritroua discosto dalle d

Ordine Toschano con suoi Bellissimi Capitelli, e sue Basi, et accio si


Colonne siano di Valore, e di Bellissima Natura, La felice memoria di
Papa Giulio 3" ne hebbe Notitia di queste Colonne Vaghe, pero subbito Ordino che douessino
che
andare a Roma delle quali se ne serui per Ornare la sua Uigna Uicino al Palazzo del Papa,
le furno
hoggi di si fa chianare la Uigna di Papa Giulio, ma doppo che le forno polite, et imbronite
delle Medeme Colonne se ne ritrouano anche quattro
apprezzate mille e cinquecento scudi I'una.
proportionatamente di

habbi da Creder che

le d^

'

The

ii8

British School at Rome.

others were removed towards the end of the


builder (Cabral and del Re, Delle

excavations were
180)

made

1736 (see Volpi, Diss,

in

two more columns of verde

others of other kinds

and

by a Tivoh*
More important

i8th century

di Tivoli, 64).

ville

Accad. di Cortona,

dell'

palms high by
some fragmentary

antico, 12

of marble,

2 in

\'\.

diameter,
parts

statues,

of a mosaic pavement (Furietti, de Mtisivis, 52), and a flight of steps

descending to the baths were unearthed, and the following inscriptions


were discovered C.I.L. xiv. 3908, 3910, 391 1, 3912,^ and the brickstamp
122b, which

XV.

ibid.

Ficoroni, Labico,

dated by Dressel slightly before

is

Canina

37).

unimportant excavations made

{Edifisi, vol.

Fig.

123 A.D. (see

of

12) speaks

108, n.

p.

half of this century, and notes

in the first

the existence on the spot of an

v.

Ionic capital {Edifizi, vol.

vi.

tav.

120,.

I).

Further excavations were


S. Pietro della Citta

Chiesa di
Bagni per

altre in la

Luogo

di

Si

et altre si ritrouano in lo

Luogo

ritrouano anche in d

ui si

di

Bagni

MedemoMolti

di

1857 by the pontifical government

in

Nostra di Tiuoli

Medemo Adornamento

il

Altri pezzi rotti per terra.


'

made

Ritrouano Anche in d Luogho di Bagni Muraglia grosse

con

di Venticinque palnii

piii

li

Seggi Ordinatamente per la Comodita di colore che doueuano prendere li Bagni in de


Muraglie(f. 104"), si uedono Aquidotti e credo che seruiuano per Sfumatorij delle Stufe, perche altro

suoi

effetto

non poteuano

The passage

is

fare per ritrouarsi cosi alti in

taken from a copy of Zappi's

and which came from the

Corvisieri's library in 1902,

original dates from

Kircher

MS.

Municipal Library there) which

preserved in the

fabrica haec

de Muraglie

583 {C.I.L.

acquired at

for on

To

sale of Prof.

library of the Briganti

'erat

'

The

value of his statement

the inscriptions found here must be added C.I.L. xiv. 3541.

gives the following account of

MDCCXXXVI

The

Colonna family.

columnis ex ophite, quern serpentinum vocant, lapide suffulta, quae


allatae feruntur, et eae putantur esse, quas Constantinus imperator in
.

19 he repeats a conjecture that the columns in


{Papers of the British School at Rome, i. 233).
p.

is

Costantino

Vetus Latium, 203) seems to have seen columns of serpentino verde as well

Thermarum

Torre Nuova

the

xiv. p. 371, xiii.).

deinde avulsae Romam


Ecclesiae Lateranensis a se fundatae ornamentum applicuit.
uncertain

di Ottanta palmi.'

piii

history of Tivoli (the original of which

it

'

praestat

is,

however,

the Lateran were found at

Revillas {Herculis Fanning

alium lapidem proferre recentissime, anno

scilicet

ad Aquas Albulas effossum, nonnihil tamen mutilum

H E R C V L E
.:

ANTISTIVS CN F

exscripsi

CENS
DECVMA FACTA ITERVM

DAT
The
full

indication of

its

(the italics are


'

trasportata,

find-spot in the Corpus

incorrect, for the passage quoted from Volpi runs in


:

e stata ritrovata e scoperta dal P.

ed amatore

is

mine and denote the portion omitted)


Dio sa quando, nel sito del Collegio vecchio

sollccito della

de' Padri della Compagnia di Gesu,


Girolamo Tebaldi della 7nedesitna Compagnia, sagace investigatore

venerahile Antichita

?'

quest'

anno

1736.'

discovery, Volpi could profess such ignorance of the place where

it

How,

in the

was found

is

very year of

another matter.

its.

Classical Topography of the

Roman Campagna. II.

119

order to ascertain the plan of the building marble pavements were


found in situ in some of the rooms, and the following brickstamps (the
in

discovery of which in this place has not been recorded in the Corpus),
C.I.L. XV. 1019 (date about 120 A.D.), 702, 1500 (reign of Hadrian), 617,
1081

(Viale e

A.D.)

(145-155

Analisi Chiniica, Roma, 1857,

The

340).

52

p.

Acque

Albiile presso

Tivoli,

Roma,

Gori, Arcliivio Storico di

iii.

were those of 1902 {Not. Scav. 1902, in


two hermae, one having an ideal female head of

latest discoveries

Com. 1902, 209)

Bull.

Latini, Siille

archaistic type, the other, headless, bearing the

name

of Thespis,

came

to

some walls were also found, and a fragment of a metrical inscription


accompanying some object dedicated to these springs. Several statues
have been discovered here at various times among them the statue of
light

Hygieia now
(Sebastiani,

the

in

Sala

Croce Greca of the

Museum

Vatican

204), and that of Apollo Lycius now

Viaggio a Tivoli,

the Capitol (Bottari, Mus. Capit.

iii.

tav. 13).

channel by which the waters of the Lago delle Colonnelle are

The

conducted into the Lago della Regina cuts through some brick
which probably belong to other buildings connected with the baths.
lead pipes said to have been found here must, as

water from the Lago

for the

in

S.

Giovanni, which

is

Canina

says,

walls,

The

have served

slightly acidulous, not for

the sulphur water, which would have choked them.

little

way

to the E.

is

the Casale Sant' Antonio, near which in the

i6th century were found small marble statues


Colle Ferro the son of

Duke Federico

At

of the nine Muses.

Cesi found a bracelet of gold, a vase

and some female ornaments (Antonio del Re, Delle Antichita


Tiburtine, cap. v. (Rome, 161 1) 93).
Not far from the Casale S. Antonio to the N. is some flat ground known
The name appears in two documents of the end of
as I piani di Conche.

of

the

silver,

Trebellius

i6th century, cited by Bulgarini, Notizie di Tivoli, 133.

Pollio {Script. Hist.

Aug.

Vit. xxx.

Tyrann. Vit. Zenobiae ad

fin.)

says

that the villa of Zenobia, assigned to her by Aurelian, was situated


Tiburti (agro)

nomen

est Concae.'

writers

dence

is

non longe ab Hadriani


If the

on Tivoli suppose, and


very curious.

The

near the Casale S. Antonio


Martial

name has

(i.

is

palatio,

is

in

atque ab eo loco cui

not actually lasted on (as

many

of the

quite possibly the case), then the coinci-

idea that the villa of Regulus

12) cited supra, 97.

'

is

to be sought

due to a misinterpretation of the passage of


It

may

be noted here, once for

all,

that an

The British School at Rome.

I20

exhaustive examination shows that the traditional names attached to the


invillas in the neighbourhood of Tivoli are, almost without exception,
sufficiently

vouched

In not

for.

more than two or three cases can a name

be given with a reasonable degree of probability to the remains of a villa


of a
as a rule the traditional denomination is due to the misinterpretation
passage of some classical author, to the distortion or the misapplication of
a local name, or to reliance upon an inscription which is either a forgery
or, if

villa

genuine, affords no evidence as to the


or near which

in

waterpipes, which

it

was found.

The

name

of the proprietor of the

testimony of inscriptions on

of such great value in determining the ownership of

is

Hills,

Campagna, and especially in the Alban


hardly any such pipes have been discovered.

travertine which supported

the

the ancient villas in other parts of the

is of no avail here, as
Returning to the Via Tiburtina, we find that, just to the E. of the road
to Montecelio, the modern Via Tiburtina diverges to the right of the
Many of the large blocks of
ancient road, which runs almost due E.

After running straight on for


this point there

The

is

tomb

roadway on each

about 600 yards

it

side

are

in

still

situ.

turns off S.E. by E.

now a mound of debris on the

S. of

large blocks of selce with which the road was paved are

at

the road.

still,

some

of them, visible in the field walls, while fragments are seen along the line
The width of the road between the blocks of
of the roadway itself
travertine

which flanked

it

on each side

is

approximately

metres

7-1

(24 feet) (see infra, 124), while the blocks of travertine are from
0-95 metre in thickness and from i to 2h metres long (Fig. 10).

074

to

road crosses the ancient road again just opposite the


modem bathing establishment. The water by which the baths are supplied
by Cardinal
is brought from the Lago della Regina in a canal constructed

The modern

Ippolito d'Este in the

i6th century, and

is

carried

away

to the Anio.

Hereabouts 'in septo Thaddaei Barberini was found C.I.L. xiv. 3913.
Just beyond the collection of houses which has sprung up here is a tomb
of travertine concrete, with a square chamber with four niches inside the
'

and the voussoirs of the arches are of stone on


the N. of the modern road, which has been taken by the earlier topographers
to be the tomb of M. Plautius Lucanus, on the faith of the forged inscripThe inscription has been interpreted by more recent
tion C.I.L. xiv. 361*.
facing

is

optis reticulatum,

writers to be the

probably intended

14th milestone of the Via Tiburtina, which


it

to represent.

its

forger

Roman Campagna. II.

Classical Topography of the


Between

this point

and the railway the ancient Via Tiburtina

modern

traceable on the S. of the

paving-stones being actually in


the line

even clearer

is

blocks of travertine,

many

On

to

parallel

it,

clearly

some of the

the further side of the railway

now running

the road,

and

road,

situ.

is

121

E.S.E.,

flanked by large

is

of which have been removed, while

its

selce pave-

ment has been taken up bodily and the blocks used to form a wall which
There are also many tombs, and several cippi, some
skirts its N. side.
Several of the
of which are actually in situ upon either side of the road.
and plan of

cippi bear inscriptions, which, with a full description

tion of the road, have been published by Prof. Lanciani

22 sqq.

have derived important information as to

in Bull.

this sec-

Com. 1899,

earlier discoveries

from an unpublished paper by the same author, Relasione sui ritrovamenti


d'antichitd,

Barco nel

1885

13 Die.

..

Sulle Antiche

territorio di Tivoli (for a short

cave di

summary

Travertino dette del

see Not. Seav. 1886, 24).

Beginning just E. of the railway, we saw the foundations of three tombs


on the S. side one of travertine blocks, one (a columbarium) of opus

reticulatum of cubes of limestone, and the third of brown tufa blocks (a

VVe also found a

material not found in the immediate neighbourhood J.

was not

travertine cippus (which

making a branch

and had probably been found

in situ

line to the quarries)

bearing the following inscription

in

C-FICTORIVS

C-L-MOSCVS
ET SVEIS

SIBI

IN-FRPXIIS
The

cippus, which

was quite

perfect,

was rounded

at the top,

and the

portion exposed above the ground measured 0*545 metre in height, 0-48 in
width, and

01 65

in

thickness, while the portion

below ground measured 0*53

in

height.

The

intended to be buried

lettering

is

good, and the

inscription probably belongs to the last century of the Republic.

little

further on

is

a large

tomb on

the N. side of the road, built of

opus reticulatum, with large square blocks of travertine at the angles.

The
is

S. front of the

tomb

is

7-28 metres in length

at the S.E. corner there

a travertine cippus in situ (without any inscription preserved), while that

belonging to the S.W. corner


moulding round the front as

lies
if

in

the interior of the

tomb

the surface had been prepared

it

has a

for

an

British School at Rome.

The

122

inscription, but there

been

left plain,

Close by

is

no trace of any

letterin<r,

or the inscription painted on

and the cippus

may have

it.

lies another cippus of travertine (not

/;/

siUi)

with

its

inscrip-

tion only partly preserved.

PINNIA

cT

ET

SIBI

LPINNIO Li ACASTO
PATRON MAG MERC
IN
AGR PXX

After

in

the third line there

is

space for another letter

no

doubt

the text was L(uci) F(ilio) or L(iberto).

Further on are several more cippi in situ on either side of the road in
most cases they are so broken that the inscriptions have been destroyed,,
:

but two retain a few

One

letters.

has

ME
IN
IN
while the other has only one

FRON'

AGRO

P'

line,

LIBERTIS LIBERTABVS
To
At

the S. of the road

this point the road

sulphurous water

is

this

is

a large mound, probably the base of a tomb.

covered with a crust of deposit

has been broken through

paving-stones and blocks of travertine.

The

in

left

by a stream of

order to extract the

period at which this was done,,

both at this point and further along the road towards Ponte Lucano,
fixed

by a

letter of

Leo

to the people of Tivoli, dated

is-

15 19 (publi.shed

by Lanciani, Bull. Com. 1899, 25), thanking them for the blocks of travertine
which they had allowed to be extracted from vestra strada veteri que
ambobus lateribus lapedibus {sic) quadratis munita est vulgo nominata la
'

quadrara' for use

We

in

the construction of S. Peter's.

next reach the group of half-ruined houses now known as the

Casaccia del Barco (a corruption of Parco) and formerly as the Casale


Petrucci.

One

of the

buildings

rests

upon an ancient tomb, formed

Roman Campagna. II.

Classical Topography of the


of a large mass of concrete

475 metres

the interior,

in

123

metres square, with a round chamber in

diameter, having a rectangular niche projecting

and a lancet window between each niche, except on the


The walls of this chamber are finely faced with
side on which is the door.
blocks of travertine, and the moulding of the door and the cornice of the
into each angle,

impost of the domed roof are very well executed.

An

internal section

and inaccurate plan are given by Canina, Edifizi, vi. tav. 122, Figs. 7- 10.
The inscription which belonged to this mausoleum is, in all probability,
See Sante Viola, Storia di
the fragmentary inscription C.I.L. xiv. 3760.
Tivoli,

35,

ii.

be found

in

who quotes Cabral and del Re (though the account is not to


The tomb is generally known as the tomb of
their work).^

Claudius Liberalis, but the sepulchral inscription erected


{C.I.L. xiv. 3624)

is

in

honour

his

inscribed on both sides of a cippus, and therefore did

Other inscriptions that have

not probably belong to a tomb of this kind.

{op. cit.

xiv. 3736, 3750, 3751, 3864. Antonio del Re


124) speaks of the discovery of two coins of Septimius Severus in

161

We

been found near here are C.I.L.

1.

found a fragment of an inscription upon a block of marble

lying just outside the tomb, the letters of which are 7 cm. in height.

K
^

3 5i

it,

(Fig.

11)

which emerges from the ground close to the

right

to

the

It

edge of

quarries

travertine

the

begins almost at once to run on arches

metres

Twelve

beyond the casale are the remains of another tomb.

Just

yards away on the right of the road, and parallel to

in

height inside, with a span of 273

while the specus


material used

is

runs an aqueduct
casale,

and goes

500 yards away.

about

the highest of these

the piers are

0'85 broad, with walls 0*33 thick

is

v6 metre

on each

thick,

side.

it

is

might belong to any age

some very strong reasons


Roman period and was constructed

gives

Besides a short description of the

owner, the following passage occurs

masso rettangolare,

The

the rough surface travertine which abounds here and can

be got off the ground without quarrying, and the style of construction

rough that

2'82

in

una

'

for

holding

that

tomb given on

facciata del quale

si

fasi,

so

it

belongs

to

the

for the use of the quarries: (i) the fact


the authority oi Sig. Antonio Petrucci,

its

palmi 20 dal monumento e stato disotterrato un


scorge un perfetto triangolo, nel cui mezzo e il corpo

in distanza di

lunare, che incomincia a presentare le sue

is

but Lanciani {Relazione, 1885, A)

e sonovi inoltre tre stelle.'

The

124
that

British School at Rome.

ends abruptly at the edge of the quarries, which have been entirely

it

abandoned from the time of the Romans

until quite recent years

(2) the

existence of water reservoirs along the line of the aqueduct, which are
certainly

One

Roman.

of these, near the

W. end

of the arched portion,

measures 21 by 3-38 metres, has a vaulted roof, and still has a quarterround moulding of opus signinum in the internal angles, which is an
unmistakable characteristic of a

Roman

water reservoir

(3)

the

size,

and importance of the aqueduct, and especially the size of its


Apart from these
is equal to that of the ancient Marcia.

length,

specus, which

considerations,

it

to

difficult

is

suppose

that

The water which

mediaeval or modern times.

that of the sulphur springs, for Cabral and del

was

it

constructed

conveyed was probably

it

Re

{pp. cit. 57)

say that the

The aqueduct which

channel was incrusted with sulphurous deposit.

Roman

supplied the Villa of Hadrian, though undoubtedly of

date,

constructed very much more carefully than this.


Shortly before the end of the aqueduct is reached, the road

through by a branch railway

be seen

Lucano

in
'

is

feet)

first-class

this

is

Roman

must have

that the road

is

cut

section

reproduced

blocks of selce, which

a layer of

half as
roads,

much

'

breccia di

in

may

Ponte

again as the average width of

and serves to indicate the immense

carried at this point.

wall of opus incertum 0-45 metre thick, and on the


is

not

more chips of selce, then mud and sand,


The roadway is 67 metres in width
of chips of selce.

Roman

and other

there

is

is

or river gravel, then

(about 22|

traffic

Below them

the fieldwall.

then another layer

this

The road was paved with

loc. cit.

The

line for the use of the quarries.

of the road was taken by Prof. Lanciani, and his drawing


Bull. Com.

in

a footpath

On

each side

S. side

is

of the road

metre wide, paved with chips of selce and sand, and

outside this a wall of very large blocks of travertine

This wall was discovered

for

of the quarry, and a part of

078 metre

in

width.

a length of 80 metres, running along the edge


it is still

visible,

though most of

it

has been

removed by modern quarrying.


As has been said, the working of the quarries was only resumed a few

While they were abandoned, the overflow of the Aquae


Albulae had made a stratum of hard incrustations, which covered completely the perpendicular N. edge of the quarry when this was removed,

years back.

the wall of the quarry was exposed precisely as the

Romans

left

it.

The

enormous size of the workings (500,000 square metres) shows that this was

Roman Campagna. II.

Classical Topography of the

the most important of their travertine quarries.^

It

described by Prof.

is

Lanciani in Ruins and Excavations, 35-37.


The modern workings have removed the road bodily

way, but

now

The

about 17 centimetres

what the meaning

in height,

of the inscription

bricks,

etc.,.

and not deeply cut

may

be,

is

doubtful

it

in
is

The

cannot venture an interpretation.

the S. side just to the

W.

of the Casale del Barco the road

supported by a wall of rough opus incertum, perhaps of

may

and

seemed undoubtedly ancient.

lettering

it

date, built almost

it.

probably a quarry mark, but

On

still

is

observed a block of travertine bearing the following inscription

letters are large,

the stone

little

In the field on the

removed from the road.

travertine blocks from the supporting wall,

from the tombs which lined

Here

of the road

crowned by a wall of recent

is

entirely of the paving-stones

many

The embankment

a N.E. direction.

in

quite clearly marked, and

N. are

for

soon becomes traceable again on the N. side of the quarry,.

it

running

125

Roman date, though

have been substituted for the big blocks of travertine

time of Leo

{supra, 122).

It is

is

removed

in

the

probable, however, that at this time the

ancient road was abandoned.

The road now

turns again, and runs slightly N. of E. until

Not long before arriving

Ponte Lucano.

at the bridge,

we

it

reaches

pass a small

rectangular building built of concrete faced with small pieces of travertine,

which

the chapel of S. Ermo, built by Hadrian

is

Baronius, cited by Cabral and del Re,

Anio
^

The name

'

inscription C./.Z.
(f.

del

138)

'.

Medmo

op. cit.

mound composed

an enormous

is

57).

IV

in 11

To

59 (according ta

the S. close to the

entirely of quarry rubbish.

We

Tiburtinus (with 'Lunensis' and 'Lesbius') lapillus' occurs in a sepulchral


We may cite the description of Zappi
vi.
13830 ; cf. also infra, 20I.

et in

quel luogo ui sono Restate quattro Memorie, in questo Modo hanno lasciato
si come la Natura 1' ha creato dico un quatrangolo

Sasso a radicato della Terra Proprio,

grosso piu di dodici palmi per faccia et alto 30 palmi, et questo li Scarpellini di quel tempo si
risolsero a lasciare queste quattro Memorie accio si conoscesse la Moltitudine delli quadri, che da
quel luogo

si

Cauauano

uia per

Abozzare

Monte

il

il

la Citta di

et tutte quelle scaglie,

et altri

si chiama
Roma.'

quale oggi di

Testaccio in

quadro,

ouero scarpellature che

il

scarpello Buttaua

Lauori, ne ridussino tanta gran Moltitudine che ne fecero un


il

Montarozzo della Uiuara, Contrafaceuano quel Monte

di

The British School at Romk.

126

soon reach PonteLucano^ and rejoin the modern road, which runs not
far from and parallel to the ancient road between Bagni and this point, and

Some ruins along


presents no features of interest or traces of antiquity.
to be the site
writers
modern
it, N. of the Casale del Klarco, are believed by
of the discovery oi C.I.L. xiv. 3755. But according to Nicodemus,- p. 68,
this was made on the occasion of the destruction of some ruins near the
canal of the

Re

Aquae Albulae that

is,

tomb

125) speaks of a round

{op. cit.

Truglio, where, about

many

1609,

little

way

nearer Tivoli called

described

known

quarries

S.

Fosse, which were also worked by the

Le

at

Peter's

quarries called

and human

Rome

(Zappi,

Le Caprine,

still

in

evidences of a neolithic station

tomb

and are

have

still

worked.

position

been found

Inst.

teeth,

E. all

and facing

{B71II.

the

In

arrow-heads, and animals'

sitting

Romans, but

they were used to provide material

106^'),

i.

further N.,

buried

skeletons,

to the

is

a mile to the N. are the large travertine

More than

lost their ancient character

have long
for

as

II

fine blocks of travertine were dug out.

This has now entirely disappeared, unless the reference


sitpra, 123.

Antonio del

a good deal further VV.

1866, 35

1873, 38)-

The

bridge by which the Via Tiburtina crosses the Anio,

Ponte Lucano,

is

a fine specimen of a

7 metres over all (Promis, op.

cit.

Roman

33, gives

that of the bridges of the Via Valeria)

Originally

preserved.
tav. 121,

it

had

and Nibby, Analisi,

five
ii.

it

bridge (Fig.
as 7-20

now known

12).

Its

width

metres the same

as
is

as

the ancient parapets are no longer

arches (according to Canina, Edifizi,

vi.

575), built of blocks of travertine, the core of

Four arches are now visible,


the left bank is closed, and is of

the bridge being constructed of lumps of tufa.


the

being buried

fifth

mediaeval brickwork

that nearest to

the next

is

intact

the next again has been broken,

and restored with masonry of the 6th century, like that used for the Ponte
Nomentano and the Ponte Salario. It is probable, therefore, that it too

was broken by
supra, 16,

The

n. i),

Totila,

cut

all

who, as Procopius

tells

us {Be//. GotJi.

iii.

24, cited

the bridges over the Anio between Tivoli and

existence of a good

many

paving-stones

in

the fieldwalls along the

first

Rome,

part of a lane

from Ponte Lucano to the Lago della Regina may indicate its antiquity but
A similar doubt must be expressed with regard
the evidence is not sufficient to assert it positively.
modern road until a point
to the line tentatively marked as ancient in the map which follows the
Palombara.
to the E. of the 21st kilometre, and falls into the road from Ponte Lucano to

which runs

"-

For

W.N.W.

this

work on Tibur, of which only one printed copy existsfrom which various MS.

copies are derived

.see

C.I.L. xiv.

p. 371.

Classical Topography of the

Roman Campagna. II.

restored by Narses, like the other two mentioned {C.I.L.

and

vi.

127

The

199).

bank shows signs of restoration in the Middle Ages


while the buried arch is probably still further in on this side.

arch nearest the right

The bed

of the river has risen very considerably, so that but

The road

be seen of the lower part of the bridge.

end of

inasmuch as

it,

it

right

and

has therefore been protected on the

it

by a wall of blocks of travertine (Nibby,

bank

certain writers

{e.g.

can

turns sharply at each

built as far as possible at right angles to the

is

stream, though not entirely

little

Sebastiani, op.

cit.

^Z-.

cit.

576), of

ii.

209) speak as though

it

which

had belonged

to a small harbour.

At

the E. end of the bridge, close to the river bank,

the Plautii, a remarkably well preserved

Roman

is

mausoleum.

the

tomb of

It is circular,

Three inscripwith a chamber inside, and faced with blocks of travertine.


built into
marble
of
block
a
upon
one
siti/
still
in
tions belonging to it are
the

mausoleum

which form a
is

itself,

the other two upon slabs set between half-columns,

Canina thinks that

towards the road.

sort of facade

only part of a rectangular enclosure surrounding the tomb.^

The

tions are given, together with a complete bibliography, in C./.L. xiv.


Piranesi, Antichitd

3608.

1-6, give plans

Fig.

122,

tav.

Romane,

battlements which surround

it

iii.

and

11- 13,

tav.

and Canina,

illustrations of the

bear testimony to

its

this

inscrip-

3605-

Edifizi, vi.

mausoleum.

The

constant use as a

fortress in the Middle Ages, owing to its important strategic position at one
end of the bridge. The arms of Paul II, who restored it in 1465, still

remain

(cf.

Bulgarini,

op. cit.

30).

In some ground belonging to Giovanni

(whether to the N. or to the

we

S.

Pacifici,

are not

50 paces from the tomb

told),

on the

left

bank of

the Anio, the inscription C.I.L. xiv. 3644 was discovered in 1842 (Viola,
Tivoli

ml Decennio

1835-1845,

Canina

58).

{Edifizi,

v. p.

107, n. 8

cf. p.

109,

n. 12) speaks of a building belonging to an ancient villa, with floor of opus


signinum and walls coated with cement (probably therefore a water

reservoir), as existing in

d'incontro

al

the property of the brothers

Ponte Lucano.'

In the

Giansanti, 'quasi

same neighbourhood was discovered

the inscription C.I.L. xiv. 3681.


136"
Ricinta d^ Mole con un Teatro di Colonne di Pietra
f.
Ordine lonico con le sue nicchie di Mezzo Rilievo, ma il Teatro resta
Riquatrato dico con quattro facce di tal sorte che la d^ Mole o' Sepoltura la si ritroua restare in
mezzo circondata intorno come lo dico con due Bellissimi epitaffi.'
1

This

is

also the view of Zappi,

Tiburtiiia alte dodici

Palmi

di

'

The

128
J ust to

British School at Rome.

Lucano are the remains of a villa

the N.E. of and above Ponte

perhaps to these that Cabral and

del

Re

luogo che dicesi alto di Ponte Lucano

refer {op.
.

cit.

appendice,

p. 4),

it is-

'

nel

tuttora appariscono per ampio-

tratto antichi ruderi disfatti,' placing there the villa of Zenobia.

Sebastiani

(p.

364, n. 9) cites Antonini {Candelabri antichi) as describ-

a sundial in travertine found near Ponte Lucano, and at his time

ino-

England

in the collection of

Thomas

ni. The Road from Ponte Lucano to


DI

At
the

the

left

in.

F, Hill, Esq.

S.

Maria

Cavamonte.

Plautii a road diverges to the S., running close ta

tomb of the

At

bank of the Anio.

first

it

presents no traces of antiquity^

{Sckede,'w. 12) noticed paving-stones in the fieldwalls on the

though Nibby

but after about a mile a road which is indubitably ancient diverges


from it in a north-easterly direction, and ascends almost straight to Tivoli
left,

{infra, 142, 188).

From

an ancient road

is

Lucano

this point at

certain,

and

it

any

may

rate, therefore, the

existence of

be inferred from Ponte

fairly

also.

After leaving the Anio,


Vittorino, at

first

it

runs along the valley of the Fosso di San

on the E. bank of the stream, and then on the W.^

running below the Colle Cesarano.

Here, according to Bulgarini

{op. cit.^

129), the pavement of the ancient road was discovered and removed.
Various discoveries have been made at different times upon the Colle

Cesarano.

Ligorio {Neap.

lib. 35,

f 214) states that

on the road which,

diverges from the Via Praenestina and runs towards the Villa of Hadrian
a tomb was excavated, which contained three marble statues, upon the

bases of which were the inscriptions C.I.L. xiv. 3900-3902 in honour of


and he adds that the
some members of the family of the Caesonii
;

were removed to Corcolle. In Cod. Ottob. 297 f. 2r of the


Vatican library C.I.L. cit. 3900 is spoken of as having been found at
inscriptions

Cesarano.

Zappi (MS.

cit.

f.

105) has the following passage

Imperatore [Cesare Augusto] diede anche Ordine fare un


altro Bagno delle Medeme Accque in un Luogo oue hoggi si dice Cesarano
uedasi che Anche ritiene il nome Corrotto di Cesare il qual luogo e
'

II

Medemo

distante

alii d!

Primi Bagni piu di tre Miglia

Accque per Aquidotto

il

si

conduceuano

quale passa sotto della

le d^

Medeme

Fiumata Aniene questo

Roman Campagna. II.

Classical Topography of the


dico esser stata cosa

con

le

difficile,

Medeme Accque

uedono Anco

si

dentro con

li

li

Uestigij delle Uaschette

Uestigij simili, et conueneuoli a

altri

Anni sono un

Bagni, dalli quali se ne leuo gia Molti

129

una

Epitaffio di

come nel presente libro si potra Uedere


Bella
{C.I.L. xiv. 3900). ... In questo Luogo si ritrouo Anche una Testa di un
Marte Bellissima sopra di un Musaico Bellissimo, e Raro il quale seruiua
Memoria, a sugetto

si

per Pauimento in diuersi Luoghi di essi Bagni con molti Aquidotti di

Piombo per
di

marmo

le

Accque

dolci

e ui forno trouate anche certe lastrine

anche una Zampa

di

Leone

medaglie

con

Bellissime indorate

argento, e

di

di

Argento,

ui

considera che

si

si
il

(?)

ritrouo

resto del

Leone resti nel medemo Luogo sotterrato, I'Aquidotti di Piombo


conduceuano I'Accque dolci in Mezzo di un Prato, Risorgeuano in una
fonte Regia Bellissima di perfette Accque.'
It

need hardly be said that the story of the conduit under the Anio has

no foundation

in fact.

Antonio del Re
Angelis

in

the Anio

{op.

Bulgarini

waterpipes.

some leaden
made by De

74) mentions the discovery of

cit.

cit.)

ijoc.

speaks

excavations

of

1769 at the 'Villa of the Caesonii,' which he marks quite near


and there is a villa which corresponds fairly well with his

indications, a kilometre to the E. of the Casale Cesarano,

where there are

remains of a black mosaic pavement with white border.

still

In these

one a seated statue, without arms,


and another representing Bacchus with some

excavations several statues were found


with Cerberus at the side,

pieces of columns of fine marble, a lead pipe,

two rooms, which


Viola {Bull.

still

Inst. 1853, 147) records the

on the summit of the

hill,

plaster,

represent

discovery of a

with a wall of tufa above

an arched entrance to the tomb


the centre to

and three large coins

pavement and

retained their marble

in

this wall

tomb

it

metres high, and

partially

left in

covered with

About twenty vases


They were said to be

upon which were some paintings.

colours were discovered in the tomb.

also

cut in the rock

a mass of rock was

the funeral couch, and

wall-lining.

of various

of archaic

appearance, but a coin of Gordianus Pius was found at the bottom of the
largest

The remains

of a large villa

may

still

be seen at the

S.

end of the Colle

Cesarano,^ immediately above the present road, noted by Cascioli, Meniorie


^

The name fundus Ceseranus

occurs in a document of 924 A.u. [Keg. Subl. f. 185) published by


1 12.
In a bull of 978 the confines of it and of the fundus

Bruzza, Regesto della chiesa di Tivoli,

The

130

British School at Rome.

The style of construction is optis reticulatum


One fragment which I found bore an unpubh'shed stamp

storiche di Poli, p. 35, n. 13).

with brickwork.

resembling closely C.I.L. xv. 632

TONNEI

DI

TEGLAV

Another had obviously been moulded upon a marble slab probably

moved from some tomb, which bore an

The

the letters reversed) upon the brick.

(with

All that remains

period.

... nor ...

...

little

beyond

is

impressed

lettering

is

of a good

is

this villa

omm

an ancient road diverges to the E.

N. edge are the remains of small brick tombs of a late period.


cutting of the road

is

re-

this

inscription

clearly

marked

it

on

its

The

descends N.E. to the valley, and

reascends to the Colle Bulgarini, upon the top of which, at the

then

Casetta Bianca, are some large vaulted substructures of a

villa, and further


Thence it descends, crosses the
Fosso di Ponte Terra, proceeding over some very hilly country, and
and finally descends
passing between the remains of two large villas
steeply through a cutting and reascends to the Villa Bulgarini, which lies

W.

the traces of other

Roman

buildings.

at the

S.W. end of the Villa of Hadrian.

The road which we have been

from Ponte Lucano now

following

descends steeply through a cutting, passing remains of


side, to the
is

still,

This was

Osteria delle Capannelle.

an important

meeting-point of roads.

in

From

Osa

Poli.

pateino {infra, 148,


(a cart track

(jy.

n.

the

'

it

caccabelli.

mile),

and

W. comes

the

at the Osteria

it

now known as the Via di


we have now reached will be

is

as far as the point

are given as (i) via publica, (2) paterno, (3) flumen (the Anio), (4) carrarea

Carrara di Paterno

ab uno latere
qui pergit ad palatium antiquum.

fundum

nth

about the

{i.e.

description of

on each

ancient times, and

deverticulum of the Via Praenestina, which diverges from


deir

villas

silice

'

(?).

But

just

after this

qui descendit a ponte lucano.

tertio latere via publica.

et a

we have

'

fundum

silicatum.

a secundo latere alia silice

quarto lapide fundum gostanti.

').

Roman Campagna. II.

Classical Topography of the


found
It

Papers,

in

177

i.

the rest of

course

its

may

be best dealt with here.

Ponte Lucano to Cavamonte, and

crosses the road from

and E. slopes of the Colle Fiorito.^

On

each side of

of the road

The

is

are deep ravines

it

and extraordinary
as the Colle

naturally a strong one, though there

is

way to show whether


The rock has been hewn away

positive evidence either

times or not.

and even more

at the

it

to

was occupied

in

some extent on

modern bridge which spans the gap.


At the S.E. angle, upon the edge of the rock, there is a
angular blocks of yellow and dark-brown tufa, which appear

much weathered

one

no

Roman
the

S.,

is

by a

wall of rect-

have been

to

before they were placed in their present position, and

have been relaid roughly, with much mortar between them,

They measure

is

E. end, where the path ascending from the valley

passes through a cutting, so that the only entrance to the village

average

Lungo.

on the further side of that to the N.E.

the village of S. Vittorino.

of this village

site

known

reaches the top of the ridge

it

skirts the S.

then turns due E., and ascends

It

steeply through a long cutting of considerable depth


regularity, until

131

built

metre

to 0*5 2

0'43

gateway of the

into the

062
modern

height and

in

in

later times.

length on an

in

measures

village

Below this wall there is a small cave cut in the rock


X
upon which the village stands, which may be a tomb. Within the village
itself are no traces of antiquity.
A little further S.E., upon the E. (upper)
0"8 metre.

0"59

of the

side

path which ascends

is

which

quite uncertain.

is

From

from the ravine,

the

kept back by a wall of rough blocks of brown

the path

this point a

At

first

road (possibly of

sight the

Roman

ground

tufa, the

masonry seems

to

above
date of

belong to

origin) diverges to S. Vittorino, passing through

which is known as the Porta Nevola, and which is of quite uncertain


Somewhere between Porta Nevola and S. Vittorino below the hills of S. Germano (wherever
age.
they may be) is a nymphaeum cut in the rock and decorated with mosaics and shells according to
Rafifaele del Re, in his edition (1883) of the first five chapters of Antonio del Re's Storia di Tivoli,
an archway cut

in the rock,

p. 225.

It is locally

Upon

wrongly

known

as

La Grotta

di Paris.

the Colle Fiorito, Kircher (Latiu/ii, 188


:

Collatinam.'

but Fabretti [De Acjuis,


Revillas,

map

opp.

p.

cf.

90)

map

opp.

marks here

p.
'

142) places the site of Aefula

rudera alterius oppidi ad viam

on the other hand, places the ruins of Aefula on the Colle Tasso, where

there are the remains of another large

villa.

Another building of which I do not know the site is mentioned by Maria Graham (Lady
Callcott), Three Months in the Mountains East of Rome (1820), 14.
'We [going from Le
Capannelle towards Poll] entered a thicket that clothes the steep banks of the stream.
As we
ascended, we passed the foundation of some large antique building, formed of great square blocks of
Peperino, and observed a fluted marble column lying across the path.
These remains are near the
little unhealthy town of San Vetturino
{sic).
'

The

132

British School at Rome.

the Cyclopean style, but the material

is

against this supposition,^ and so

the fact that the interstices between the blocks are

filled

is

with small chips of

As I have said, the whole question of the antiquity of the site is


stone.
undecided. Asfar as I know, no previous writer has dealt with it, and the
not sufficient to enable a positive judgment to be formed.
To the S.E. of the village there is a group of ruins on the edge of the
ravine, consisting of two ancient water reservoirs and the apse of a

evidence

is

mediaeval church.

kilometre to the S. of these ruins, in the ravine which runs parallel


to the S.W. side of the Via di Poli, a large buttress of concrete, faced with
opus reticulatum with quoins of tufa, is seen on the S.W. bank of the

There are no traces of any corresponding buttress on the other


bank, and it is doubtful whether it is the pier of a bridge. Some 50 yards
to the S. of it are the remains of a square structure in opus reticulatum.

stream.

Halfway between

in

valley

27th and 28th

road diverges

an ancient
the

the

Fosso

of the

San

di

opus quadratum by which

it

the steep ascent beyond the

On

After reaching the top of

and

an E.N.E. direction,

in

this

crossed the stream are

pavement

running along the Colle Faustiniano.

turns

As

descends

into

where remains of a bridge

Vittorino,

it

of the road

kilometre stones

is

first

in

still

E.S.E.

far as the

still

to be seen.

good preservation.
and then due

Casale Contrevio

E.,
it is

easily traceable by the abundance of loose paving-stones which mark its


Cassio {Memorie di S. Silvia,
line, but beyond that its course is doubtful.

26) states that

does not show

Nibby
of

it

it

ran to the village of Casape, but Revillas in his

{Analisi,

i.

29) considers the Colle Faustiniano to be the site

Aefula,- afterwards occupied

remains exist at the


^

map

beyond the Casale Contrevio.

W. end

by

of the

a large
hill

villa,

of which considerable

(see Cassio, op.

cit.

\6)?

Horace

Giovenale in Diss. Accad. Pout. vii. 333 cf.


85
But the instances cited are rather cases of the use of tufa
the narrower sense, i.e. where there is an intentional avoidance of

See however Fonteanive, Avanzi

Ciclopici,

Mc'langes de V Ecole francaise, 1905, 185.


in

'polygonal' masonry in

horizontal bedding.
2 The form Aefula is given by the best MSS. of Horace and is also found (in the cognomen
Aefulanus) in an inscription from Carthage of the Republican period {C.I.L. ii. 3408); cf. also
Hiibner, Hermes, i. 426.
C.I.G. 3187; C.I.L. vi. 34220, 34221.
3 The bricks forming the floor of a room discovered here in January, 1745, bore the stamps

C.I.L. XV. 1061, 1075a. 2385, and a fragment 'ex pr. Domitiae Lucillae.'
According to letters written by Silvestro Petronselli of S. Gregorio to Revillas (on Sept. 7th
which I acquired in the Corvisieri sale, mosaic pavements were found in the
and 13th,
1739),

vineyard of Lorenzo Lupidii, situated upon the Colle Faustiniano, also vaulted chambers with walls

Roman Campagna. II.

Classical Topography of the


mentions

village

this

in

Carin.

Aefiilae declive contempleris

iii.

arvum

29. 6,

'

udum Tibur

ne semper

from Rome.

there
sidia

Livy xxvi.

9.

hills

as

was placed

us that a garrison

tells

when Hannibal threatened an attack on Rome in 210 B.C.: praein arce, in Capitolio, in muris, circa urbem, in monte etiam Albano,
'

atque

Aesulana

arce

This

ponuntur.'

occupied a strong and lofty position.

the peoples of

The

Latium

too,

Aefulana

arx

the

it

must have

it

among

69) names the Aesolani

iii.

not

is

sufficiently

prominent or

agree with the indications given by Horace and Livy, and


that

shows that

Horace

qui interiere sine vestigiis.'

by Nibby

selected

site

'

passage,

In the time of

been already decaying, as Pliny {H.N.

sible

et

Telegoni iuga parricidae,' as being,

et

with Tibur and Tusculum, a prominent point in the view of the


seen

133

identical

is

with the

it

is

lofty to

very pos-

Mons Aeflanus

of

C.I.L. xiv. 3530.

Bonae Deae sanctissimae caelesti L,


Paquedius Festus redemptor operum Caesar(is) et puplicorum [sic] aedem
diritam {sic) refecit quod adiutorio eius rivom aquae Claudiae August(ae)
sub monte Aeflano consummavit imp(eratore) Domit(iano) Caesar(e)
This inscription runs

Aug(usto) Germ(anico)
is

now

preserved

discovered

co(n)s(ule)

non.

iul

'

(3rd July, 88 A.D.\

the village of S. Gregorio, but the place where

in

refers,

where the Fosso

Castelmadama
Gericomio

xiiii

'

it

It

was

The tunnel of the Aqua Claudia, to which the


commences in the Valle Lungherina at the point

not certain.

is

inscription

thus

di

Scarabazzo

sheet),

at

it,

into

it

(see

and ends

the Ponte

valleys to the N. of

falls

somewhere
Antonio, at any

the Staff

Map

the

of

to

S.

25,000,

the Casale

S.
rate, if not in one of two
where small pieces of aqueduct substruction (which

may, however, belong to the Anio Novus) are


taken

in a straight line,

insignificant hill

it

visible.
If the tunnel were
would pass under the the Colle dello Scoglio, an

about a mile to the E. of the summit of the Monte

8 palms in thickness, with bricks bearing a stamp, of which only the letters

QSE

S.

appear to have

been legible (possibly C.I.L. xv. 2385, P CQSEPTICIORI). One hundred and thirty paces from
Grande an aqueduct i\ palms (about 56 cm.) in width was found, which
probably supplied this villa.
From a sketch-map given by Petronselli the villa might fairly be conjectured to be near the

the so-called Casale

house marked 312 on the Staff Map (Colonna sheet)


Petronselli's knowledge of the aqueducts
seems to have been extensive, as these maps and his letters show.
Further towards the Mola a large ruined round tomb of opus reticulatum, originally of the size
of that near the Ponte dell' Acquoria {infra, 1 51), but only preserved to a height of about 8 palms
:

(I'So metre),
'

was

This form

seen.

is

given by Weissenborn,

who

notes no other reading,

The

134

Angelo

in

British School at Rome.

There

Arcese.

is,

why

however, no reason

name Mens

the

Aeflanus should not have been used somewhat loosely, even


ness

belonged to the

it

was the
the

site

note

though

2)

high,

very much shut

is

by

either

other fortified

towns

hill

been scarped to increase

N. but

the

is

from the

so that

all,

{Analisi,

in position,

xiv.

vii.

latter

19),

in

its

it

and

In

to the

an ancient

it is

it

is

site

resembles

the fact that the rocks have

The

present

364).

p.

by Rome, so

that

its site is

to

any

adduce

to

positive

identification with Sassula,

official

resting as

town belonging

as a

hills,

would not answer

Whether

inability

see CJ.L. xiv.

128) considers that

ii.

and

his

erroneous,

certainly

364, cf also

p.

but this village,

natural defensibility, leaving only one entrance

its

confesses

to the adoption of

Kircher {Latitun, 184

once (Liv.

at

favour of his conjecture.

in

which has led


Sassola

hill

as a point of observation.

Horace or Livy.

Nibby

indeed, uncertain.

arguments

strict-

in

if

that this

by the surrounding

in

Mons Albanus

Rome

not visible from

indications given

from

Dessau {C.I.L.

extremely probable.

is

not to be compared with the

is,

And

Arcese.

in

tentatively places Aefula near S. Gregorio

it lies

fact, it is

S.

Angelo

of the ancient village of Aefula (and, later, of the temple of

Bona Dea)

p. vii.

Monte

name

S.

Gregorio da

does on the opinion of

it

Sassula

is

only mentioned

Tibur and afterwards taken

quite uncertain.

Marocco {Stato Pontificio, x. 49) places the site of the ancient city on
the Colle Mercorano (Marcoraino on the Staff Map), but the remains appear
to be those of a villa of

Roman

The main argument

in

times.

favour of the

Monte

S.

Angelo

is

the exist-

ence of important remains of a road of an early period ascending the


mountain side, and of fragments, which probably belong to the temple of
the

Bona Dea, on the summit.


The remains of the road are

of the

mountain

at

point

distinctly traceable

not very

far

on the southern slope

above the new road to

Gregorio, to the E. of a large rectangular water reservoir of


built of concrete,

and unroofed, so that

it

was intended

Roman

for the storage of

The road was supported on the lower side by a


Cyclopean masonry, and paved. Above the road there are two

rain-water.

wall

better built

17 metres

terrace

and better preserved than the

in length,

again

the

and the lower


rock

has

been

is

other.

6 metres wide.

cut

of

terraces,

one above the other, supported by similar walls, the lower of which

much

S.

date,

is

The terraces are


Above the upper

perpendicularly,

and there are

Roman Campagna. II.

Classical Topography of the


remains of walling built against
situ of

fragment of concrete in

Upon

it.

Roman

135

the upper terrace there

The

date.

is

period and purpose to

which these platforms above the road are to be assigned is doubtful, but,
according to Lanciani {Rom. Mitt. 1891, 153), they are probably of pre-

Roman

date,

though the lower shows a marked horizontal tendency.


S.E. side of the mountain the road can

High up on the

summit

traced again, ascending towards the

by

it

be

are the remains of a

small water reservoir.

The

mountain

ruins at the top of the

aeval, being those of a church

are, as

and convent

they stand, entirely medi-

but

many

blocks of granular

some building of Roman date have been used in


In
the bushes near by lie seven unfluted columns of
construction.
their
Carystian (cipollino) marble, each 0-35 metre in diameter, and fragments
of other marbles such as Phrygian (pavonazzetto) and Numidian (giallo)
tufa which belong to

lie

scattered about, with pieces of brick also.

Bona Dea.

materials belonged to the temple of the

Up

Beyond

an ancient

line.

of the road

itself,

it

where we

to the point

would seem

left it

In all probability these

the Via di Poli almost certainly follows

this there are

no actual traces of the antiquity

but ancient buildings are frequent along

course,

its

the narrow ridge along which

we now

pass

and

From

have been a necessary artery of communication.

to

some of the most important

Rome was

remains of the four chief aqueducts by which

supplied with

Anio Novus) are


water (the Anio
The ravine to the right of the road is spanned by the Ponte
visible.
that to the left by the Ponte S.
Lupo, which carries all the four
Gregorio, the Ponte S. Pietro, and, higher up, by the two ruined Ponti
Vetus, the Marcia, the Claudia, and the

delle

Forme

seen until
S.

Rotte, which

one

is

Antonio may be

See Lib. Pont.

fundato.'

ii.-ga,

ii.

1 1

(ed.

them

have

while further

fallen, are

Roman Campagna, and

Duchesne)

'hie vero praesul (Sergius

'

et in sancto

H) cum

Angelo

in

Fagano

de omnibus ecclesiis

a special branch

(Leo HI) vestem de


curam gereret, etiam
largiorem quam pridem

fecit

sollicite

basilicam Sancti Archangeli, quae in cacumine Fagani mentis est constituta,

The

origin of the

reading in the second passage)


to derive
2

it

name Faganum

or

Faianum

ac sarta tecta eius

(the latter

not clear (Bruzza, Regesio di Tivoli, 138)

is

Ponte

cannot attempt here to

fuerat a fundamentis perfecit, ac radientibus picturis luculente pingere iussit,

noviter restauravit.'

not to be

to the N. the

still

The aqueducts, however, form

seen.

of the topography of the

as their arches

last,

close up to

is

an alternative

Duchesne

is

inclined

from fagus.

Graham

{op. cit.

line with the Catena,

19) says,

shows

'

the antique paved

itself in

way from

more than one spot

Tivoli to Palestrina, which runs in a

in the corn land

we passed

through.'

Thk

136

British School at Rome.

deal with, or even to mention, the problems connected with them, especially as

hope shortly

them more

a long-cherished project of describing

realise

to

Rev. 1900, 325).

fully (see Class.

30th kilometre stone of the Via di

further on, at the

little

stands on the

Poli, there

left

a large

water reservoir consisting of a single chamber, with the opus signinum.


and close to it on the E. are the
still well preserved

which lined the walls


remains of a large

villa.

do not know

this

if

found the fountain, ^rzV. Mjis. no. 2538 ('found


about

five

miles

terminal figure,

from

1742

z^/V/.

six miles from Tivoli

To

discovered in 1775,

('

on the road to Praeneste

the S. of the road

poet Horace

villa,i

some way

villa,

Torrione,

seen.

is

opus

reticulatum

{Edifizi,

vi.

tav.

to the

ruins,

about

').

cT Horace,

Cavipagne

326;

ii.

authority

Papers,

(cf

i.

to
'^

3).

of the Via di Poli, are the remains of

left

N. of which a prominent building, called

a large tomb, with a square base in two tiers of

It is

opus quadratum and

among some

Piccola,

and the

Hence ran an ancient road

hiit.).

same

the

to

kilometre further on, to the

another
II

according

1776 by

Praeneste'),

believed (without reason) to be that

(Chaupy, Maison de

Cecconi, Storia di Palestrina, 85


Praeneste,

La

in

to

the Casale S. Giovanni in Camporazio, to the

is

S.E. of which are remains of a

of the

near the road

Tivoli,

that in which were

is

above which

tufa,

(Cascioli,

Memorie

circular

rises

Storiche

146) gives a view and plan of

di
it

Poli,

and

it

structure

in

Canina

7).

seems to be

an antique building, arched and vaulted, and surrounded


by large blocks of stone,' by Graham {pp. cit. 105), who also saw 'on the
opposite side a ruin, corresponding with the former, on which a
referred to as

'

sloping-roofed

small

house

has

been

some picturesque

with

erected,

chimneys.'

According to Cascioli

{pp.

cit.

the Torrione

6),

is

on the

line

of a

deverticulum from the Via Collatina or Praenestina (the latter can alone

be correct) which follows the Fosso di


within
1

sight

of the

Ponte

Here, according to Graham

S.

Giovanni

Lupo, and

{op. cit.

17), 'there are

many

(in

Camporazio), comes

passes

thence

by way of the

ancient substructions

and funeral

vases and other antique fragments have been found.'


-

The

Oue'pfo-Tjs (or Oue'peo-is) n-oTOjubs of

which Strabo

(v.

3.

II,

p.

239) speaks as flowing

Many writers before Nibby


through the territory of Praeneste, has been variously identified.
believed it to be the Fosso dell' Osa, which does not however, as he justly remarks, touch the
His own identification of it with the Acqua Rossa is, however, not certain
territory of Praeneste.
{Analisi, iii. 465), for Strabo's indication of its position, ^el 5jo tt\s x^PJ {Xipaiviaiov), is not
sufficiently definite,

and we have no other mention of

it.

Classical Topography of the


Torrione to Saviano,

Roman Campagna. II.

and probably goes on to

S.

137

Gregorio and the Valle

degli Arci.

At

the Torrione another road branches

passing to the

off,

of the

S.

ruins of S. Angelo (which are purely mediaeval), and, crossing the

Vignala e delle Facciata, dirigevasi

torio

delle

della

Cona.

alcuni

Ouivi

tratti

anzi, questa

The

romana.'

tempi poco remoti,

in

Map, but the road spoken of seems

alto

sull'

nome

pure col

Strada

di

shown upon the Staff


have passed E. .of Casape and S.

mentioned

places

last

Carticoso

terri-

potevano ancora vedersene

chiamasi

localita

al

'

to

not

are

Gregorio to the Valle degli Arci.


I

have not yet been able to verify these

give this information for what

mentions several

villas

in

Ficozzivoli (see Papa^s,

i.

it

is

facts

the neighbourhood of

map

no.

on the

spot, so

The same author

worth.

Poli,

must

{op.

cit.

7)

including one at

of which Marocco {Stato Pontificio,

vi.),

X. 13) also speaks.

A mile further on we reach the Villa Catena, where our road is joined
by a modern road from Gallicano, which probably follows the line of an
ancient one {Papers,

Beyond
Poli itself
in

i.

208).

this point the

is,

Via

di Poli presents

no features of

probably, entirely of mediaeval origin, though

it

interest,

may

and

perhaps

ancient times have been a small town dependent on Praeneste (Nibby,

Analisi,

566).

ii.

Two marble sarcophagi,


298* = vi. 10500), w^hich are
states,

discovered in

From

not, as

mountain path leads

S. Pietro, the citadel

the road

to

of Praeneste.

Cavamonte, which

The whole

narrow, flat-topped

runs

of this district
hills

between Capranica

to the road

Returning to the Osteria delle Capannelle {supra,

valley.

xiv.

Nibby
to be seen in the piazza were
the neighbourhood, but were brought from Rome.

Poli a steep

and Castel

one of which bears an inscription {C.I.L.

and deep

is

due

almost

made up

ravines, so

130),
S.,

we now

along a

rejoin

narrow

of an alternation of long,

that from above the whole

The streams which run at the bottom of these


ravines are comparatively small, and much of the conformation of the
country must be due to volcanic action. They all run in a north-westerly
looks like a single plateau.

direction,
1

and

fall

into the

The Fosso Saviano

della Mola.

is

the

Anio between Ponte Lucano and Bagni.

name given by

the Staff

Map

to the

We

upper portion of the Valle

British School at Rome.

The

138

soon pass, on the

Roman

a very large

lower Casale Corcolle, built upon the platform of

E., the

villa,

little

by Nibby

{Analisi,

and Pliny {H.N.


is

constructed of opus quadratum of tufa,


iii.

ii.

668) and others

Latin

iii.

69).

people

28, 29.)

This has been conjectured

to the S. rises the hill of Corcolle.

Ouerquetulani, an old

tion

is

(See Nibby, Schede,

and of opus reticulatum.

which

to be the site of the

mentioned

The only argument

by Dionysius

(v.

61)

favour of the identifica-

in

the similarity of the name, for nothing

town of the

known

is

of the history of

the Querquetulani.

The

site,

however,

is

The top

almost certainly ancient.

of the

hill is

a plateau, measuring about 250 yards by 50 or less, the natural defensive


advantages of which have been increased by the scarping of the tufa rock
to the S.W. by
all round, and by its entire isolation from the larger plateau
a deep ditch, 30 or 40 yards wide and 10 to 15 deep, which has been made
winding road cut in the
across the isthmus that once united them.

rock ascends on the

W.

side

and reaches the summit not

far

that remain

belong to the mediaeval castle, which occupied the whole of the


the

At

hill.

the

S.

end, forming

mediaeval wall of blocks of yellow

the

S. wall

tufa,

which

from the

the top of which

N. extremity. Another path ascends on the E.


a narrow footway has been cut to give access to the plateau.
Upon the plateau itself all the traces of construction
side, at

summit of

of the farmhouse,

may

or

may

is

not have

belonged originally to the ancient city walls, and which were very likely
quarried on the spot.

perhaps have been occupied by the city


of
itself, Corcolle forming the arx, but as the former presents no traces
ancient
remains
of
some
are
there
(though
the
S.E.
towards
fortification

may

plateau to the S.W.

The

upon it) this is quite an uncertain point. At its N. extremity is


a small modern chapel, over the door of which is an ancient relief (Fig. 13)
the
in white marble, the subject of which is not easy to make out, though
buildings

figure

'

on the extreme right


Passato

il

is

clearly Hercules with the lion's skin.

ponte [over the fosso di Acqua Rossa] diriggendosi a

riconosce essere questo fondato sopra

sin.

verso un fenile

si

ruderi di un' antica villa costrutta di grandi massi di pietra

alia
quadrata e di opera reticolata. Credo che le piotre quadrate di tufa fossero un' opera precedente
dall' antico
quale poi venisse addossata la costruzione reticolata, ovvero che fossero queste tolte
Del resto dalle rovine di questa villa si traccia tutta la sua spianata
recinto di Corcolle
copre forse le rovine del piano
il vicino tumulo macchioso [point 72 on the map]
inferiore
.

nobile.'

Classical Topography of the


Close to

metre

are the remains of a mediaeval building very likely an


built with blocks of brown tufa 0*49 to 0*59 metre height,
in

and of

thickness,

in

come from

139

it

earlier chapel

0'5i

Roman Campagna. II.

soine building of

There are

different lengths,

Roman

also fragments of about six

(cipollino) marble, 0*45

metre

which almost certainly

date.
fluted

columns of Carystian

Further to the S.E. are several

in diameter.

blocks of tufa which appear to be remains of the foundations of buildings,


the date and nature of which cannot be determined without excavation.

The road

to

Cavamonte runs along the valley to the S.W. of the


Rather more than a mile from Corcolle a road-cutting

plateau of Corcolle.
in the

rock

is

seen descending to join

it

from the

on the further bank

hills

Haifa mile further we reach


another ancient road comes from the same direction, and
(W.) of the small stream.

(see Papers^

The

i.

193, 195,

and map

known

upon a rock which forms the extreme

is

still

hewn and scarped

only accessible from the N. and

S.

which may, or
period,

classical

difficult to

such existed.

of yellow tufa 0*38

belonged to

the southern tower, which

considerable

here

made more

quoins.

It

is

in

quite

and

it is

very likely that

tower belonging to a

villa

we have

in

site is

difficult

find

it

somewhat

Latin or mediaeval

by the

that

fact
its

opus reticulatum with

sides a

small

improbable that there was any

occasion to fortify the place at the time

use

we

pentagonal, contains on four of

is

amount of construction

rectangular stone

0'40 metre

fortifications of the

Here, as so often,

decide whether the fortification of the


is

by the hand of man,

further

ends by steep paths.

many blocks
may not, have

The problem

origin.

in

if

naturally a

is

in all directions, so that the castle

In the castle walls are


height,

What

as the Colle S. Angelo.

strong position has been strengthened


the rock having been

our road

iv.).

castle of Passerano stands

N. end of a ridge

Passerano,^ where
falls into

when opus reticulatum was

in

here the remains of a lofty view

which occupied the

site

in

Roman

times,

and

incorporated by the builders of the mediaeval fortress into their scheme


of defence.

Nibby
city

(Dionys.
1

{Analisi,

iii.

67)

is

inclined to identify Passerano with Scaptia, a

which was a member of the league


v.

61) and later on gave

The name appears

Duchesne,

ii.

335).

in the

nth

its

for the restoration of the

name

to

one of the

century ('Annales Romaines 1044- 1073

Tarquins

Roman
'

tribes.

\n Lib. Pont. ed.


The

I40
It

was supposed

to

British School at Rome.

have been dependent on Pedum from the traditional

reading of a passage of Festus

343

(p.

quam Pedani

urbis Scaptiae appellata,

Mlill.),

'

Scaptia tribus a nomine

But Pcdani

incolebant.'

a conjecture of Ursinus, Miiller preferring Latini.


a small town, being one of the
6'i)

names

many

tain {Papers,

i.

and

205),

we

if

evidence, to connect Scaptia with

refuse,
it,

we can have no

notion of

by-road

is

clearly traceable as

N.W. of our

not been able to follow

road, but

it

to

iii.

position.

its

crossed by a deverti-

is

culum from the Via Praenestina (described Papers,


Selva, on the

due

The site of Pedum is itself unceras we must in default of further

mile or more beyond Passerano our road

for this

is

clearly quite

of Latium which Pliny {H.N.

cities

as having utterly disappeared.

was

It

i.

The

204).

cutting

ascends the steep side of the Colle

beyond the top of the ridge

have

it.

Continuing to follow the valley, we reach

mile and a half more

in a

(nearly three miles from Passerano) the Osteria di Cavamonte, where our

road crosses the Via Praenestina.


in

Papers,

i.

Its

Between Ponte Lucano and the


course of the Via Tiburtina

is

but

most

it is

of the line of the

described

the lane which ascends to the

road,

Tempio

Tosse the

della

for the first mile

it

passes over

probably been uninterruptedly under

likely that

modern

so-called

not certain

gently rising ground, which has

left

is

From Ponte Lucano to Tibur.

IV.

cultivation

course beyond this point

205, 267.

it

ran at

first

along or slightly to the

and then coincided more or

Tempio

della

Tosse

in a

with

less

N.E. direction.

Five hundred yards from the Ponte Lucano two large tombs stand on
the S. side of the highroad, both of

modern houses.

They

are square,

and

them forming the foundations of

part was adorned with a large bas-relief.


retains

still

its relief,

which

ing a horse by the bridle.^

The

relief

tion, is
^

is

The

in the Villa

level,

better preserved of the

the

man

two

hold-

of both figures have been removed.


is

in

Albani (see Helbig, Fiihrer,

a
ii.

more ruinous condi782).

See Piranesi, Aniichita Koviane, ii. tav. 38, 39, for plan and view.
(who speaks as if this relief were no longer in existence).

no. 823

while the upper

of Parian marble, and represents a

The heads

belonging to the other tomb, which

now

of travertine

built of blocks

base of each contained a chamber at the ground

It

represents

Cf. Helbig, Fiihrer,

ii.

Classical Topography of the

Roman Campagna. II.


Cabral and del

the favourite pursuits of the deceased.

Re

141

cit.

{pp.

48)

on the authority of Gaetano Mattia that it was a rehef of a lion


fighting with a horse that belonged to this tomb and passed into the

state

collection of Card. Alessandro Albani.

A
{Cod.

third
cit.

f.

tomb of
16^

cf.

similar design stood near here in the time of Ligorio

Cod. Vat. 5295

lion, is

now

Duhn,

Ajitike Bildwerke,\\\. 3785

f.

Si'')

the bas-relief, representing a large

preserved in the Palazzo Barberini in

Bausteine, 924).

Elevations of

all

Rome

Ligorio [Bodl.

Questo

ueduta

Friedrichs,

3817 was

C.I.L. xiv.

' Di
un altro sepolcro
117) gives the following particulars:
non ui e rimasto nulla, perche noi di

f.

altro e uicino al sopra detto del quale hoggi

havemo

le

Canon. 138,

Matz and von

the three tombs are given by Giuliano

da Sangallo, Cod. Barb. xlix. 33 (now 4424), f. 41.


discovered at a gunshot distance from these tombs.^

guasta.

(see

Wolters, Gipsahgusse, 1922

uisto guastare, et

il

pilo e

ben uero che era

ma

gittato a terra rottissimo,

I'arco

per esser bella compositione, e' di inuentione no' ho' percio lasciato che io non lo habbia qui disegnato, che se la fortuna
lo ha' fatto spianare, non ha potuto pero far tanto, che non habbiamo potuto col mezzo della carta e

che

tencua pensile e stato uenduto et toltone uia

il

del inghiostro fare che non ne sia affatto spenta la

VI

largo

alto otto piedi.'

sassi dalli

memoria

il

tiuolesi

et

pilo poteua esser

The sketch which should have accompanied

longhoXV

this description

piedi, et

wanting

is

in

the MS., and as the passage quoted comes immediately after that cited sttpra, 113, it is possible
but as the first and third of the three tombs of
that the reference is to a tomb near the 9th mile
:

which we have been speaking form the main subject with which Ligorio is dealing, it is possible
that he is here describing a fourth member of the same group, especially as he states that it was the
people of Tivoli

On

who

destroyed

the other hand,

it is

to

it.

be noted that Zappi says nothing of the destruction of any tomb,

and speaks only of the three mentioned in the text (f. 135^)
in luogo doue si dice Serena, ui si ritrouano tre bellissime Memorie antique, e rare come ui
diro, si ritroua principalmente un Leone di Marmo del Naturale in un Posamento Rileuato in alto
da 35 Palmi in circa, questo Posamento si ritroua esser fatto di quadri di Pietra Tiburtina. Ma il
Leone resta scolpito in un quadro di Marmo per ogni faccia da 12 palmi in circa, doppo si ritroua
un altra Memoria di un Cauallo, et di un homo grande del Naturale. ... La Terza Memoria
sono doi Statue rileuate in alto da 30 palmi con il Mede(si)mo posamento. Ma discosto I'una
Memoria all' altra da 60 Palmi, e tra esse due Figure ui si ritrouano una Roba Tonda, et si uede
'

essere posata sopra una Tauola

Memoria del Cauallo tenuto da quel homo per le Redini della


Briglia si ritrouauano di tanta Vaga Bellezza che gli forno leuate le Teste ad Ambedue ... da un
Gran. Sig. Caualiere nel tempo della Guerra di Papa Pauolo quarto dell' Anno 1557, che di
Re filippo
rincontro alle d(elt)e tre Memorie notabili ui si ritrouauano li soldati, et esercito del
il Duca d'Alba.'
Re di Spagna, gouernato sotto
'Son

forzato dire che quella

Bartoli (G/i anlichi Sepolcrj, tav. 47, 48, 49) gives views of all these

tombs the

last

after a

drawing by Pietro da Cortona.


It would also be interesting to know whether Zappi saw a more direct road from Ponte Lucano
to the Villa Adriana than any of which we know at present say along the path from the bridge to
the easternmost of the two houses marked C. Galli on the map, where at present there are no traces of
He speaks (f. 137^) of two roads starting from the tomb of the Plautii, the one going to
antiquity.
Tivoli, e I'altra uerso la Gran uilla di Adriano Imperatore discosta Mezzo Miglio secondo che si
uedono li Vestigij delle Siricate [sic, for Selciate] Antique accosto alia d^ Mole.'
'


The

142

The name

British School at Rome.

Serena, which

supposed by the

belongs to this place, has naturally been

earlier writers

on the antiquities of Tivoli to conceal the

name of the owners of the tombs or of


To such identifications little or no real
It

has

been

Villa Adriana,

Antiqiiario,

strongly

15, Analisi,

tombs

are not really

iii.

value attaches.

by Nibby, Descrizione

(especially

661

though

at

della

work, Viaggio

in his earlier

he rejects the theory) that the two tombs

119,

i.

held

a villa near them, in classical times.

standing

still

but are pillars flanking the main entrance to the

all,

Villa of Hadrian, which lies half a mile to the S.

This view

by no means

are

however, rejected by Sebastiani,

is,

most cogent among which

reasons, the

Ergdnzungsheft

identical in size

24)

iii.,

is

is

op. cit. 222, for

and Winnefeld {Jahrbuch des

of this opinion.

Even

op. cit.

Revillas in his

E. of

them

35) this

is

to the

W.

of

certain

not

in situ.

it

soon

at right

falls

This road has

ancient.

it

angles into a road

pavement

its

in

still

preserved in

immediately to the N.E., and beyond the Casale Leonina ascends

situ

up the

in a straight line

hill

pavement was discovered

its

{Notizie degli Scavi, 1883, 17).

other hand,

to the S.
in

end of the town of

Going

in a

to Corcolle

and Cavamonte

Nicolas Audebert
f.

is

where

S.

Croce

south-westerly direction, on the

road bends slightly to the

the

Tivoli,

1883 just outside the Porta

S.,

cuttings in the rock which are indubitably ancient,

720,

cf

Nibby's theory.

them shows no

though there are a few paving-stones

noticeable, however, that


is

in favour of

a paved road running S.S.E. immediately to the

The modern path

traces of antiquity,
It

would be no argument

map marks

both.

which certainly

(as Sebastiani, op.

on the authority of the tenant of the vineyard

224, tells us,

Promis,

Instituts,

an ancient road passed

if

between these two tombs and led to the Villa of Hadrian


cit.

several

the fact that the two buildings

through some

passes

and

falls

into the road

{supra, 128).

probably referring in the following passage {Brit. Mus.

306) to a discovery of sarcophagi, and not to the tombs of which

MS. Lavsdowne,

we have spoken

Peu plus loing [than Ponte Lucano] on veoit a coste du chemin dedans une vigne un reste de
peinture antique qui est centre un vieil mur tout ruine et y a quelques sepultures et urnettes come
cercueils, en facon d'un long coffre, capable d'un homme y estendu, Le tout de fort beau marbre
blanc, avec facons de sculpture et aultres ouvrages par dehors.
Aussy se veoit un peu plus loing et
plus proche du chemin un vieil marchepied ou montoir de pierre contre lequel est grave I'Epitaphe
d'une mule de Crassus
'

Dis Pedib. Saxum


Cinciae Dorsiferae et Cluniferae
(naturally a forgery

C.I.L.

vi.

3443a*).

He

also notices

preserved along the road to the Villa of Hadrian, but he

is

(f.

'

307) that the ancient paving was well

not precise as to

its

exact course.

Roman Campagna. II.

Classical Topography of the

To

the S. of the Casale Leonina

which extends as

lies

the colossal Villa of Hadrian,

according to some, as

far as the Villa Bulgarini, or,

The

the Colle S. Stefano, where there are considerable remains.

been most

fully

it

far as

has

villa

and carefully described and planned by Winnefeld, who

gives a complete bibliography {Jahrbiich des


1895), so that

143

ErgdnzungsJieft

Instituts,

iii.,

seems hardly necessary to say anything more on the

subject.

The

buildings on the Colle S. Stefano, which are

and described by almost

plan,

all

villa (see especially Sebastiani, op.

who have

the authors

300

cit.

sqq.

shown

Piranesi's

in

written upon the

Nibby, Analisi,

703

iii.

sgg.),

are not considered to belong to the Villa of Hadrian by Winnefeld {op. cit.
They are separated from the rest of the villa by an interval of quite
24).

and the evidence of a recently discovered inscription (see


1899, 32) makes it very probable that they form a separate

half a mile
Coin.

Some

which belonged to the Vibii Vari.

Bull.
villa,

parts of the building certainly

belong to the time of Hadrian, from the brickstamps found there.

The main structure is a large rectangular


along the W.N.W. and S.S.E. sides runs a
the latter

is

double

ceiling

its

building facing the S.W.

and walls were decorated with

which portraits of Greek poets, with their names beneath


tablets,

were painted

Some fragments

in squares.

in

plaster,

no. 9), presented to Cardinal-

are

by now almost entirely

Above and behind

Francesco Barberini.

swallow-tailed

Sebastiani

names of Pindar and Simonides

to read the

at

the end of the

(op. cit.

obliterated.

This terrace was the

hill.

century

i8th

De

rooms on each

site of

all

traces of the structures

its

extraordinarily

bands of brick
laid

in

is

seen

irregular
in

the

a thick bedding of mortar

attention to this mixture of

in

level

and
the

and a fountain on the W.S.W.

which occupied
construction.

same

itself,

Angelis found a peristyle


side,

this

same

side,

upper terrace have

disappeared, except a chamber at the S.S.W. angle, which


for

on a

is

it

the palace

Sebastiani saw a fragment of black and yellow mosaic on the

now

302)

the cryptoporticus extends a large terrace, supported

centre, with remains of

but

cdip. xiv.

but the paintings

on the E.S.E. side by substructures, while on the N.N.E.


with the top of the

on

of these paintings were,

according to the text to Contini's plan (Kircher, Vetus Latiiim,

was able

which on

cryptoporticus,

Opus

is

remarkable

reticulatum

with

wall as very roughly cut bits of tufa


;

Winnefeld, however

modes of construction

in

{pp. ?it.

many

26), calls

parts of the

The

144

Hadrian

Villa of

British School at Rome.

The chamber

itself.

rectangular in shape, and has a

is

rectangular niche between two windows opposite the door, and a semicircular niche

substructures present other irregularities.

suggests, that

this

considers that

it

chamber

may

a view

is

on the outside.

it

Nibby

possible, as

It is

Mr. Baddeley, however,

tower.

be a temple or shrine

view by the discovery close by

this

these two niches are not

the thickness of the wall, but project from

built in

The

on each of the two other sides

and some colour

given to

is

of a marble tablet bearing the words

it

V C V
SANCTV
T

in letters

and the

The

of the second century A.D.

letters are

the School.

It

45

mm,

high

measures 21 cm. square,

tablet

has been presented by Mr. Baddeley to

it

mark the actual confines of a sacred


somewhat remarkable. Sanctus,
common than sacer, is not unknown in this sense

must have served

to

grove, but the form and wording are

however, though less

Lewis and Short,

(cf.

established

as

inviolable,

but sanctus locus

disturb.

To

sacer locus

the

sanctus

i.e.

Thus,

consecrated to a deity).
locus

v.

s.

Sanctus.

e.g.,

a temple, grove, or the like,

and prolonging

At

substruction wall strengthened by buttresses.

sacer

is

forbidden to injure or

it is

also sanctus, but the converse

S.E. of this terrace

rendered sacred,

orig.

(whereas sacer signifies

sacred, inviolable

any public place which

is

is

'
:

its

is

not always true

N.E. side

').

runs a

the end of this

is

building generally called an amphitheatre, oval in form, with four or five


concentric walls only a foot apart

its

construction

is

very rough, of small

rectangular blocks of tufa set in thick courses of mortar, but

of

Roman

date,

and may be a large open water

a letter to Revillas of Nov.


to this reservoir

2\ feet

in

in this

it is

probably

Petronselli, in

speaks of a branch aqueduct coming

from one of the great aqueducts near Gericomio

width.

The

\\ foot wide running

and

18, 1740,

reservoir.

all

reservoir

round

it,

itself,

it

was

he remarks, has a channel about

which leaves

it

in

a northerly direction

branch aqueduct was found a brick bearing the stamp

Roman Campagna. II.

Classical Topography of the


which should no doubt be read Tl

LOLLI ANICI, but which

145

have not

been able to identify with any brickstamp hitherto known.^


In the reservoir itself Petronselli saw a marble cippus, 2 palms (about
45 cm.) wide, broken, and with the surface worn in places, bearing the
following fragmentary inscription
:

He

also notes the discovery of four bricks about 45 cm. square

stamp

thick, bearing the

xv.

C.I.L.

359 (123

A.D.),

and Viola {Giorn. Arcad. cxix. (1849-50),

facsimile,

discovery of several copies of

and 4 cm.

of which he gives a
records

294)

the

here.

it

Further to the S.E. apparently Petronselli notes the existence of a


{infra, 197) in a vineyard
he writes as follows: nel piano

paved road

medesimi

dei

colli

(di

'

Stefano) nel terreno della

S.

Tivoli confine col territorio di questa terraantica con

li

si

Mensa Vescovale di
vede una traversa di strada

pietroni neri pare questa dirigga verso Giricomio, Nella

soliti

qual Vigna si trovano molte sostruzioni a opera reticolata, et in specie una


stanza con I'intonacatura di tre once, dipinta a specchi, col pavimento di

musaico finissimo,

e questo

Alia destra della strada

si

trova ancora nella piaza avanti

la

vigna 20 palmi sotterra

massi di peperino alcuni sono

pavimento su

la

si

alti

palmi tre longhi palmi 8 larghi palmi

In questo scavo 15 palmi sotterra


fatto a astrico grosso

terra,

Casale.

30 palmi lontano dal d Casale, dentro


e scoperto sostruttioni di opera grandiosa cioe

di

2| intonacati e dipinti.

il

Romana

si

e trovato

il

mezzo palmo,

si che I'altri
cinque palmi e fondamento della fabrica e cio e certo anche dalla struttura
dei massi
quali sotto il d astrico o pavimento sono rustici.'
i

The

reference

{infra, 147),

is

probably

to

road

the

though he goes on to say,

'

mentioned by

Bulgarini

nel giardinetto inferiore di questo

1 At the end oi the second


Hne Petronselh notes le lettere mancanti sono corrose,' but he
only leaves a space for two letters more at most, and shows no traces of a third line.
'

He

refers to the village to

which he belonged

S.

Gregorio [supra, 134).

The

146

Palazzo
.

una Mascara

vi e

con bocca aperta

marmo

parimenti di
bassorilievo

nel

antica di

[sic]

marmo

palmi

alta

palmi

mezo

di

di

larga palmi

ciascuno

una

vi

3I,

un onza

tre, et

Et una lapide

con alcuni ornamenti d'intorno.

alta

con alcuni ornamenti

Gericomio

British School at Rome.

con quattro

fasci

testa d'Ariete, collegati

Now, questo Palazzo' must

fascie.'

refer

'

but the vigna, one would suppose,

is

to

that on the Colli di S.

The passage

Stefano, and not one attached to Gericomio.

is,

however,

not quite clear.

To

the N. of the reservoir

which

Piranesi,

is,

however,

name CoUe

which the

S.

in

a building called the

is

reality

'

triclinium

'

by

the baptistery of a church, from

Stefano very likely originated.^

In the vineyard

we were
in which it stands are three recently excavated marble columns
told that many bodies had been found, which points to the existence of a
:

The

Christian burying-ground."^

so-called

N.W. of this again is also a later


Further
some ancient reservoirs.
buildings hitherto described

The

plan (a simple hexagon)

Abendla>ides,

t.

i.

fig.

is

temple of Minerva

building, though to the

away

the S.E.

to

W.

of the

'

of

to the
it

are

group of

a large open water reservoir, trapezoidal

and partly sunk below ground

in shape,

is

'

level

given by Dehio and

it is

v.

faced with brickwork

Bezold, Kirchliche Baiikunst des

lO.

Two

fragments of a Greek inscription, cut on a slab of while marble, are built into the stairs
I have not been able to obtain a satisfactory reading of them, as
The letters are 2 cm. high.
they are much worn, and therefore give the text with all reserve.
-

of the cottage in the vineyard.

EIZAN
TNMENI
AAl
44

MA

ITDI A
INAAII
Z

AM

ANTIA AA

IIA-A

AA

Classical Topography of the


in

and with opus reticulatum

portion,

this

by a

Piranesi, entered

square,

aqueduct

On

of steps on each side.

flight

which ran from

To

villa.

another building

this,

in

Com. 1899, 32)


likely the

'

with

walled into a modern building here.

is

edificio incognito

of the remains on the Colle

of Piranesi's plan

'

S.

feet

subterranean

much

brick, etc.,

Another fragment of the inscription of the Vibii Vari

about.

side

a vineyard, are the scanty remains of

of opus incertum

platform

or

to

N.W.

the

putei,

the other or directly to

this reservoir either to

the N. of

above

quoins

tufa

reservoir, and a few yards from it, are two


of opus reticulatum, which must belong

this

the

with

147

with opus signinum), and was, according to

(the whole wall being lined

of

Roman Campagna. II.

Stefano

is

This

(vi. 20).

{Bull.

villa is

very

The importance

shown by the existence of two

ancient roads which pass over the Fosso di Ponte Terra, the deep ravine

runs on

which

the

S.

of

side

the

The easternmost

hill.

which the stream passes

rock; .through

the

artificial,

it

and 6

is

not entirely

Parallel to

it

is

about 200

feet

length, 30 in

in

runs the specus of an aqueduct, cut

metre wide and 185 metre high.

three courses of blocks 2 feet in height and thickness

seen on the E. side.

The pavement

descent on the N. side


Bulgarini

running from the


time

his

the channel

road ran across this bridge upon a substructure of opus quadratum

The

width.

The channel

flat.

width.

in

in the rock, 0"5

of tufa

if

these

cleft in

has evidently been enlarged by the hand of man, as the roof

has been cut quite


height,

of

This spans a

crosses a natural bridge called the Ponte Terra.

and

it

of the road

is

may

be

clearly traceable in the

was very narrow not more than 2 metres in


see also the map) speaks of an ancient road

{op. cit. 127,

villa

towards Gericomio, which had been discovered

Petronselli

ascending to the plateau

also

S. of

refers to

it.

Whether

the

road,

the ravine, led to S. Vittorino or no

is

in

after

quite

uncertain.

The
an

other road crossed the ravine nearly a mile further to the W., by

enormous

viaduct

(Fig.

14)

which has been supposed by some

(unknown apparently

to

authors (see Bulgarini,

Petronselli),

loc.

cit.)

to be

an aqueduct bridge, but certainly carried a road, and not an aqueduct.


Canina {Edifizi, vi. tav. 170) gives a plan, sketch, and restoration of it,^

and

(v. p.

190) states that the ancient

Petronselli thought that this aqueduct

'^

A much

better sketch

is

paved road could be seen on both

came from the bridge

given by Lanciani, Bull. Com.

at

Pomata

{infra, 195).

899, 35.

The British School at Rome.

148

pavement now remain, but the road is clearly


and a countryman told us
of the ravine
that some of the pavement was actually preserved at the crossing of the
sides of

No

it.

traces of

seen ascending the S. bank

next stream to the

S.

Also, the bridge

no

is

than

less

4T0

metres

any calcareous water

traces of the specus of an aqueduct, nor of

There are two

tiers

a single arch

of arches

with a span of 675 metres, while

in height,

concrete, faced with small tufa blocks

very

is

and

deposit.

across the stream, 7-95 metres

upper

in the

there are four

tier

whole structure being 17 metres.

arches, the height of the

the construction

and there are no

in width,

It

of

built

is

arranged alternately, and

bricks,

solid.

we left
we find many paving-stones of
modern road, S. of the Casale Spirito

Returning, after this long digression, to the Via Tiburtina, which


not far beyond Ponte Lucano {supra, 140),
selce built into the fieldwall N. of the

Santo, which have very likely been removed from the ancient road. Revillas,
in

marks paving

fact,

map

the legend to his

by some
of

error,

Lanciani

Not

point.

{Bull.

(though on the

near the

Sched.

in

to this

map

Coin.

tomb of

L.

he locates

Berol.

The

circiter.'

'

to

be

inscription

C.I.L.

Constanti

et

old road, as

the
xiv.

Licinius

we have

Flam(iniae) et Piceni."
(the S.)
^

The

side

of

'
:

Augustorum

Urb(i)

lane which runs on the

called Carrara di Paterno.

left

{i.e.^

'

C.I.L.

a fragment
xiv.

D C

pass.

fil.

Tempio

Senatus

or

nostrorum

Romanus

Populusque
L. Turcio

Secundo

C(larissimo) v(iro) Correctore

near the

is

This

1735 or 1736 of the

in

found

site

an old one

on

of the

of what we have assumed to be the

The name Paterno

via

Teverone

et a

della Tosse.^

curante

redegit

Asterio

3795),
in

said {supra, 140), ascended in

This inscription was

the road, at

Revillas in

3o)-

Beatissimo saeculo dominorum

planitiem

in

Praef(ecto)

'

by the discovery

case

3582

Constantis

CHvum Tiburtinum
Aproniani

1899,

prope Sepulcrum triangulare

a fairly straight line towards the so-called

was shown

on was found the

the reference letter has,

itself

vetere Tiburtina quod distat ab Ponte Lucano


pass.

far

not been inserted) indicates the existence of

a milestone

which

by

published

inscription

up

in situ

the

right-hand

18th

milestone,

line of the ancient

road

is

the act of donation to the church of

M. de Cornuta, of the year 471, published by Bruzza, Regesto della Ckiesa di Tivoli, 15, and
Duchesne, Lib. Pont. i. cxlvi., mentions 'fundum Paternum maranus \_sic\, fundum Mons Paternus
and though this locality may not be referred to in that document, it seems to be certainly spoken of
in the second document published by Bruzza, a Bull of Marinus II (945), in which the property of
the cathedral of Tivoli is mentioned (p. 20, 1. 25, fundum paterno), as also in a document of 942 a.d.
\Keg. Suhl. f. 171, Bruzza, p. 117), and in subsequent bulls {supra, 129, n.).
S.

'

Roman Campagna. II.

Classical Topography of the


a

little

Tempio della Tosse is reached, on the somewhat steep


road now has to make, and it has been re-erected

before the

ascent which the


at the spot where
loc. cit.)

now

was found.

it

wrong

surely

is

from the Ponte

149

If

referring

in

was found

it
it

in

s ilu,

Dessau

to the relaying of the steep ascent

Acquoria, and not to the road with which

dell'

(C./.L.

we

Bruzza {Regesto della Cliiesa di Tivoli, 106) interprets

dealing.

which we are now following.^

referring to the road

the right-hand side of the road

domed

octagonal structure, with a

della Tosse, an

mixtum, and

faced with opus

roof,

as

higher up on

little

Tempio

the so-called

is

are

it

belonging probably to the 4th century after Christ.

The

interior

one of the

in

Above each

with four curved and four rectangular niches,

circular,

is

latter

of which (that towards the road)

of the niches

is

On

is

in

each of which are three small niches.

much
unknown origin, and

has been
of

may

century

13th

{Cod. Barb., 4.^2^,

view of
V.

The

discussed.

constructed as a tomb.

it.

Bezold,

i.

24,

(Bulgarini, op.

and
cit.

discovered not far

t.

i.

The purpose

traditional

plan of

Canina

it

99),

'

123) gives a plan and

('^/)?2'z, vi. tav.

1.)

and the

Close to

it

inscriptions

3535, 3679 were

C.I.L. xiv.

in the following

it

work on Tibur, preserved among his papers


laudatum Paullum Columnam, qui illud ab

in

antro

expirantis

veluti

fragmento repraesentatur.

Juvenis ante

sinistro

pars antica in

Taurum

hocce Anaglyphi

tiaram phrygiam capite

Tabulae superior! angulo Luna exculpta

Gruterus"' porroquinque describit similia prorsus


^

bridge,

precisely similar inscription {C.I.L. xiv. 3583) refers


for

the

inscription

improbably referred

was not found in

situ,

to

though the

Gruter, Fag. xxxiv.

Montfauc. Antiq. Explan. tom.

i.

2.

373

sqq. (Paris, 1722).

Supra hunc

cornua

inter

marmora

to.

effossore

ejusque heic schema exhibemus.

gestans, brevique tunica indutus facem versus terram deprimit.


in

terms

Penes saepe
Tauri

Dehio and

was found a marble pavement

off.

praetio comparavit, Tibure adservatur


'

is

was made by Giuliano da Sangallo

Revillas refers to a Mithraic relief found near


in the draft of a

of the building

name, 'Tempio della Tosse,'

very likely that the building was originally

is

fig.

dome

a rectangular chamber,

is

Isabelle, Edifices circulaires, pi. 24, 53

also

(Cf.

doorway.

Traces of Christian paintings of

seen.

it

30").

^.

be

still

the

the centre of the

in

either side of the door

a circular opening.

the

and

a large window,

is

the restoration of an
I

onte

visitui".

Monfauconius^

dell'

unknown

Acquoria

is

not

The

150

novem exhibet

British School at Rome.

quibus ferme omnibus Mithras Tauro insidens, cultro-

in

que ipsum jugulans exprimitur. Et praeter Lunam in sinistro angulo,


ut heic expressam, Juvenemque sub ea, facem gestantem, Sol in dextro
angulo conspicitur

ac sub eo pone

Taurum

alios Mithras,

orientem videlicet,

alter Juvenis

facem

pariter,

quidem duo Juvenes duos


occidentemque Solem (sicuti qui medius

sed contrario sensu aut deprimens aut erigens

qui

Taurumque calcat, Solem meridianum) repraesentant, ut Mythologorum eruditiores arbitrantur. Solem itaque, seu Mithram, nostrum
quoque marmor exhibet et ni fallimur novo testimonio Templum de quo
est,

agimus

Soli

adjudicat.'

In the long description of the building

was on the

his belief that the original entrance


itself

itself,

Sun (arguing

was a temple of the

which precedes, he states


S.,

and that the building

partly

from the evidence of

C.I.L. xiv. 3535), the seven niches denoting the seven planets.
A little higher up the hill our road is joined by that ascending from

Ponte

the

dell'

Acquoria (see below), and passes under the huge sub-

Maecenas (probably a building connected


with the temple of Hercules) by an arched passage, lighted by square
apertures in the vault, the construction of which is recorded in the duplicate

structures of the so-called Villa of

inscriptions C.I.L. xiv. 3667/8.

The

history of this building

problems are connected with

is

it,

present with the city of Tibur

of great interest, and

but as

itself,

many important

not our purpose to deal at

is

it

which we have now reached, nor to

examine the Via Valeria beyond Tibur, nor the upper part of the valley of
the Anio, it only remains to speak of the topography of the western slopes
of the mountains which enclose Tivoli on the N. and

our survey of this section of the

S.,

and thus complete

Roman Campagna.

v.The Territory of Tibur on the


{from Tivoli by

the

Ponte deW Acquoria

to

Montecelio,

N.
S.

Angelo and

Palombara).

The road which descends


the Via Tiburtina on

and

at

its

to the

left just

Ponte

dell'

Acquoria from Tivoli leaves

below the so-called Villa of Maecenas,

once begins to slope steeply down to the bridge, a shelf having been

cut in the

cliff to

carry

it.

The pavement,

4'o6 metres in width,

is

well

Classical Topography of the

Roman Campagna. II.

151

preserved, and so are the substructures, partly of opus quadratum, partly

of opus reticulatum, which support the earth on the upper (S.) side of

See Canina,

the road.

Edifizi,

vi. tav.

38

he justly remarks

(v.

106,

p.

on the absence of wheelmarks, which would seem to indicate that

n. 7)

later times, at least,

it

At the bottom
commonly known as

was not the highroad to Tibur.


slope, opposite

of the

the

Tempio

the

bridge,

is

served

it

is

del

In 1839 the front of

quite uncertain.

Gjiida a Tivoli, 42).

large cave,

Mondo, which has been

enlarged, and has three niches cut at the further end of

which

in

The purpose

it.

it

artificially

in (Rinaldi,

fell

few hundred yards to the W., facing the river,

platform which supported a large

villa,

is

the

constructed of concrete faced with

courses of chips of surface travertine, arranged in eight vertical bands, each

about

In the wall are two drain holes, one arched with eight

feet high.

dark tufa voussoirs with a travertine keystone.

The Ponte

dell'

though only one,

several arches,

away by
and

still

loc. cit.)

at the N. end,

further traces of the rest of the

all

as

Acquoria (Canina,

Roman

is

must originally have had

now completely

the river (there are, however, traces of a brick arch of later date,

two mediaeval arches of concrete, which served

further S. there are

approach to the older bridge, now swept away

mud

half buried by the

the parapets

preserved)

is

metres

is 6'i

08

total

so that the width of the

highroad.

each

At

feet

At

the S. end of the bridge there

trifle

it is

including

roadway

4*5

narrower than the average


is

(the

pave-

just

over

for a bridge

on a

metres

mass of concrete on

probably belonging to a mediaeval tower erected to guard

side,

is

constructed of

width of the bridge

ment of which has .completely disappeared) was

Roman

it

the eastern parapet (of which two courses are

metre wide

The

This arch

entirely).

that has accumulated beneath

large blocks of travertine (Fig. 15).

15

preserved,

bridge having been washed

it.

pavement of the road as it winds up the


far as a chapel where the road to S. Pastore

the N. end of the bridge the

hill is

still

well preserved, as

and Vitriano goes


on the E.

is

off

tectural fragments,

(= C/.L.

due N,

At

in

hill

close to the bridge

and

XV. 7903) were discovered.

i749or

archi-

dell'

3702

Halfway up the ascent is the large


Near this tomb was found a columba-

3714,3715) and the foundations of a third


Acquoria, are mentioned by Cabral and del Re

x'j'^o^C.I.L. xiv.

tomb, nearer the Ponte

some

the lead pipe bearing the inscription C.I.L. xiv.

square core of a tomb in concrete.

rium

the bottom of the

a garden, where in 1861 a statue of Aesculapius,

British School at Rome.

The

1^2
{pp. cit.

Ampliata di Tivo/i{i66s),

io6) as hardly traceable. Marzi {Historia

refers to the
4) probably

same tomb

'
:

essendo

gli

anni andati stato dalla

acque dirupato il (ponte) murato insieme col sepolcro di


sorgeua.'
Celio, che a capo di esso in forma di baloardo
accepted that the
If the view of many topographers {supra, 108) be

violenza

dell'

Aquae Albulae

original Via Tiburtina ran by the

Ponte deir Acquoria

it

across the plain to the

would have joined the road we have been describing

of this group of tombs, at the chapel at the top of the ascent


from the bridge. I have followed, however, both the path that runs close to
and that which
the N. bank of the Anio, and finally reaches Ponte Lucano,
The first is, apparently,
runs north-westwards to the Ponte delle Vigne.
are, as I have said
second
the
of
course
the
along
entirely modern

just to the

W.

{sjipm, no), a few paving-stones (not in situ);

but the evidence seems

suppose the course of the highroad here.


Pastore and Vitriano, on the other hand, is undoubtedly

insufficient to allow us to

The road to S.
The cutting made

for

ancient.
date,

fact that after this

and the

mile and a half


that

many

is

close to the chapel

it

it

is

in

Roman

runs in an absolutely straight line for a

another strong proof of its antiquity

paving-stones exist

probably of

it is

also noticeable

the fieldwall on the E. side of

it.^

The

leads abounds with the remains of large villas, most ot


which are built upon two or three terraces, supported by massive walls on
behind the
three sides, while the fourth side is formed by the hill rising
These walls frequently perpetuate the Cyclopean style of
district to

which

it

terrace.

but that these embanking walls were constructed for the villas,
and are not remains of primitivecities or settlements adapted in later times, is
from the
clear from many indications from the careful jointing of the blocks,

masonry

conjunction of this style of masonry with opus incertum and reticulatum,


and not least from the fact that, while excellently adapted to support the

Roman

terraces of

The

they are utterly unsuited

villas,

or

for the fortresses

vii. (978), published by Bruzza, Kegesto della


miliario a suprascripta civitate plus minus quinto.

following extract from the bull of Benedict

Chiesa di Tivoli,

may

be of interest

(p. 33,

1.

32)

'

Et

Ab uno latere staphiliano. Et a secundo latere silice in qua est ponticello.


in campo maiore.
Cf. a
Et a quinto latere columella.'
Et a quarto latere piranis.
a tertio latere crepidinis.
partem terra sementaricia in fundum qui sancto Valentino
document of 990 A.D. (p. 40, 1. 10)
cum predicta Kcclesia infra se. cum gripte et parietinis suis antiquis in ruini positi
nuncupatur.
Inter afifines ab uno
posita territorio tiburtino miliario a civitati tyburtina plus minus tertius.
The road referred to
publica, etc'
latere incipientem a slaphile lapideum deinde venientem per via
leading N. from the Ponte dell' Acquoria (Bruzza, p. n^ Jin.), and the
:

is
'

in

'

both cases that

campus maior

'

is

the

flat

ground

to the

W.

of

it

and of the Colle Nocelle.

Roman Campagna. II.

Classical Topography of the

The unwalled

villages of a primitive people.^

which

side being in all cases that

they would have been utterly impossible to

rests against the hill,

defend unless the enemy confined

The

153

themselves to frontal attacks from

was seen by Pirro Ligorio, who, in an


with the 'rustica'
f. 85'), compares
Claudia
and
Anio Novus which
the
Aqua
double
arch
of
great
of
the
work
is
now known as the Porta Maggiore simili muri nelli luoghi che
below

true use of these walls

interesting passage {Bodi. Canon. 138,

'

sostengono

per fare de poggi et elevazioni, simili a quei che

terra,

in Tiuoli, nella uilla di Caio Calligola, che

oue

di Cassio,

Tivertino, che

Roma

dice Cassiano, a

si

sosteniua

I'usarono anchora in alcuni ponti che

prima

nei sepulcri nella

opere polite

altre

templum Divi

Claudi],

sopra de torrenti e

ualli

di quella rozzezza poi edificauano

come

pilastri,

one case known to

is

le

uedono

si

uede

uno monumento

in

Vmbria.'

in Spoleti citta dell'

There

parte(:) sopra

colonne et de

di

adeguano

si

e nella Villa

nel montecelio di

nel portico

Hostilia [the

curia

la

chiama Carciano,

si

me

in

which

it

can be demonstrated

absolutely that a wall constructed in Cyclopean work belongs organically


to the structure of a

On

Roman

villa

each side of the path to

looking the Anio

S.

this

is

at Grotte di Torri {supra, 35).

Pastore are the remains of villas over-

name

Villa of Cynthia (the

is,

cliff

is

arranged

appears to have been extensive, but of the


case) but

little

accept

in

August,

In

1778 a fine mosaic pavement and a few small

8 19, excavations

La

Civita, near Artena,

by Dr. G.

J. Pfeiffer

last

a distinction

is

in

Melanges de PEcole fraiifaise, 1905, 157

sqq.,

drawn between Cyclopean and polygonal

i.

I).

87-107.

Compare

1903, 229-262, and

and especially 181-186.

structures, the latter term

being reserved for those in which an intentional avoidance of horizontal bedding


132, n.

and Fea

masonry in Italy will be found in the


and myself, which will shortly appear

Papers of the American School of Classical Studies in Ro>ne,

paper on Monte Circeo

In the

Bulgarini,

18 17, 138)

also the reports on the recent excavations at Norba, Not. Scav. 1901, 514-559

my

were made by Vescovali, which are

further remarks on the dating of Cyclopean

in the Siippl.

105

op. cit.

described by Guattani {Memorie encidopcdiche per fanno


Some

generally the

(See Addenda, infra, 208.)

op. cit. 97).

above

has a lofty

bands 72 cm. high, and

villa itself (as is

statues were discovered here (Cabral and del Re,

description of

It

remains, the cultivation of olives being largely responsible

for its destruction.

In

built

it), is

opposite to the so-called Villa of Maecenas.

platform of opus incertum, which

as the

though Albert, De

as usual, quite arbitrary,

Villis Tiburtinis principe Augiisto, 53, is inclined to

the river on a

known

one, about a quarter of a mile to the E.,

is

evident [supra,

154

The

British School at Rome.

Roman Campagna. II.

Classical Topography of the

{Varietd di Notizie, 166).

155

building was uncovered with six rooms with

white mosaic pavements, one of which had a border with a meander in


various colours, a portico about
(

= 888

palms

15

= 3'33

columns, coated with stucco and painted

fluted travertine

then two rooms with marble

each, three niches for statues

in

metres) by 40 palms

and some remains of

metres), with travertine bases

pavements and,

one

room contained
Next came six

three statues of athletes, the other three Bacchic hermae.

more rooms with plain white mosaic pavements. A statue of a


Faun with the nebris, and a draped seated female figure (perhaps a Muse)
or seven

with the head

and

into the neck, the former being

let

workmanship, were discovered

inferior

nymphaeum

left

shoulder

also

two other fountain

Faun seated on a rock (bought

representing a nude

some rectangular marble


the N. of this

pilasters with

arabesque decorations

position on a projecting shoulder of the mountain,

according to Nibby
Bull of Benedict

VII

The name
(.^w^/Zi-/,

(978),

Carni.

villa

iii.

the enormous Villa

is

222),

which has a

fundum quintiliolum occurring


list

fieldwalls

{op.

x.

cit.

29)

may

gives the width as

still

37

Tibur (Horace,
to S. Pastore

be seen
metres.

the

described by writers of the i8th century

is

is

know, does not

exist.

That which

not pretend to mathematical accuracy, but


Below

this villa to the

five buttresses
is

on the

W.

W.N.W.

side,

cit.

may serve to

and

Re

cit.).

159)

it

{op.

but a

publish does

give a general idea.

is a large open water cistern, 17 "8 metres


where the ground slopes away. To the S. of the

another small one, rectangular in shape.

upper-

37),

{loc.

p.

now

had

Volpi, Vetus

{e.g.

given by Kircher {Latium, opp.

the

in
It

or

third

speak of two terraces only, as does also Nibby

plan, so far as

Anio,

and Quintilius

at

villa

253-259), has entirely disappeared (Albert, op.

very fanciful restoration

'

never have existed, as Zappi {infra, 157) and Antonio del

97)

cit.

and some of the paving-stones

Promis

most, which

may

Horace, certainly had

two or three terraces one above the other

Latium,

in

of the estates belonging to the see

was reached by a branch from the road leading

and Vitriano,

either

in relief.^

iS, i).

i.

The

and

Quintiliolo dates from the loth century,

of Tivoli (Bruzza, Regesto della Chiesa di Tivoli, 32 sqq.)


friend of

each

figures,

for the Vatican),

and a good deal higher, occupying a prominent

villa,

of Quintilius Varus.

Varus, the

marble

distance a

with three fountains was found, and a fountain figure of a

boy with a vase on the

To

of different

At some

here.

in diameter,

with

villa, close to

the

The British School at Rome.

156

Upon

the lower terrace, at the S. angle, there

is

a large rectangular

tank, about two or three feet in depth, with a pedestal at each of the

under that at the N.E. end is


narrow ends, as if to support statues
the fountain by which the tank was filled, under the S.W. end the channel
;

by which it was emptied. Behind this piscina, in the substructures of the


upper terrace, is a cryptoporticus. The supporting walls of both terraces
are of great size and extent, and are constructed of concrete faced with

opus incertum and reticulatum of travertine.

S.W. end of the lower terrace

Many

given

is

discoveries have been

made

thus describes a pavement of mosaic

bello di quante cose n'erano rimaste

a'

un festone
frutti,

fatto di frondi di

uiti

in his

'

noi (nostri) giorni, fu quello arti-

ficiosolauor di Musaico, che .... ornaua

pauim'^ d'una stanza che faceua

il

doue

inuidia ad ogni uaga et ecc** pittura,

Ligorio {Cod. Vat. 5295, f 4)


et quel ch' era piu
time

here.^

found

view of that of the

in Fig. 16.

e d'intorno, a tutta la

di diuersi sorti piantate di uua, et d'altri

con alc(un)e maschere interposti che troppo uaga cosa rappresentaua,

et di dentro poi della

riquadratura d'esso festone tutto

uedeua pieno

sorti di

come

sono

di

tutti

Cothurnici,

et ucelli cantarini.

che

pesci, et animali

quaglie,

pappagalli, et gallini, anatri

co'

quadratura

grui,

perdici,

fluviali et altri ucelli

il

truouano

si

Aquile,

minuti,

pauimento

si

silvestri,

fagiani,

lepri,

come sono

passari,

Doue era un quadro d'animali volatili, et doue quadri


come facessero una certa comparatione qual fusse piu

animali marittimi,

Questo pauim*

nobile, I'una, o I'altra.

la

sciochezza degl' huomini che

si

truouano hoggidi ha fatto che ogni cosa e stata annullata, et portata a pezzi
uia, tutto
altri

che

per I'ingordigia di quel che


si

tirati

dal

guadagno per vendergli a quei

dilettano dell' antichita, I'hanno portato altroue, et con ogni

hanno priuato quella mem(ori)a del suo luogo,


d'un corpo intero uago et utile, I'hanno smembrato, rotto et fatto inutile,
tutto il difetto e uenuto da quei che hanno hauuto per gli anni a dietro
incuriosita dell' honesto

gouerno

il

luogo.

et
et
in

Pertanto riman priuato quel luogo della uisitation di

molti che a posta ui ueniuano a uedere, et chi p [per] dilettarsi, chi p [per]

imparare
1

ui

concorreuano da tutte

le

parti.'

Antonio del Re

{op.

cit.

97)

In the Archivio StorUa delP Arte, 1890, 196, Prof. Venturl gives some account of excavations
About the former year a Hercules, a headless Venus,
Ippolito II d'Este in 1 550-1 560.

made by

and another statue were found in Tivoli, the former being given to Ippolito's brother, Ercole I,
Duke of Ferrara. About 1560, Pirro Ligorio was in charge of excavations at the Villa Adriana and
the Villa of Quintilius Varus.
^

The passage has been

already published by Gori, Archivio Storico di

Roma,

iv.

256.


Roman Campagna. II.

Classical Topography of the

says that in his time hypocausts were found on the N. of the

mosaic pavements
(i

in

parts,

all

known

566-1 572) the marble

and

157

villa,

and

us that in the time of Pius

tells

as Breccia di Quintiliolo

began to be held

and that more than twenty loads of it were removed from


by Cardinal Montino (Furietti, (t'^ Musivis, 51, speaks of Cardinal

in great repute,

this villa

Innocenzo de Monte), so that Marzi {Historie Tiburtine, 139) says, ne


fece una grossa raccolta in modo, che di presente (1646) piu non se ne
'

trovano.'

The

ma

Piauole,

succede

La

'

79]

[f.

di

possiede

Strada

porre la

hoggi

passa

Piano passa sotto


il

duceua I'Accqua Martia^

Terra

la

Tartaro prodotto da

Mezzo

per

con gran

alto dieci Palmi, e sei largo fatto

Strada Publica fatta per forza di Scarpello, e

la

in

con

Uestigij

li

Aquidotto

piano,

il

Accqua Aniene,

dall'

be of interest

Varo .... Confina con la Montagna


Con doi Aquidotti il Maggiore

Villa di Ouintilio
si

disegno passa poi per


per

may

following passage of Zappi

della

d'"^

come

si

d*^

Accque.

Montagna per

in la d^ Uilla [a description of

uedono

si

la

L' altro

quale

con-

si

the house of Mons.

de Rosci on Monte Piavola and of that of Messer Emanuele Portoghese


seruiuano alle Peschiere
[f 80] (le Accque Aniene)
follows]
.

et

Anche

intrata

la

in

fontane oue

Uano

hoggi

di

uedono

si

essa

Uilla,

Principalmente a quattro

et

Nicchie alte trenta Palmi con

le

questo luogo era destinato per un cenacolo

....

suo

per esser sottoposto

Amene

Leuante, et oltre a questo participa, e gode quattro Belle

....

il

Proportionate con una Loggia di sopra con Pauimento di Musaico,

oltre di questo

gode una Piazza

di

Cento passi longa

al

Viste.

sessanta

Tramontana oue si ritroua in mezzo Una


uerso Mezzo Giorno la Prospettiua della Valle

larga con una Loggia uerso


Peschiera,
del

fiume

trata, et

menti

seguita poi

Aniene .... oue

questo causa per

con

un

altra
di

diuersi ricettacoli

Accqua per

uedono

di
li

Pauimento

altra Piazza

quasi

Riqua-

essere la Uilla diuisa in tre Apparta-

un

Loggia, et

d^ Peschiera ui era anche nel

Magiore

Ritroua un

si

[f 80^']

altra

Pesci,

Bellissima

accosto

Peschiera

con

una Muraglia

di

Mede(si)mo Luogo Uicino un

di

altra Piazza

quattrocento passi, e larga sessanta recinta intorno secondo


Vestigij con le Base e
di essa

stato Raro, e di

Loggia era

cio
^

He

Colonne tronche, e

di tanta Bellezza

rotte per terra

che credo nel

ne ragiono de Visu, e per tutto da


seems however

to

mean

the

Acqua

di Piavola.

Modo

Me

si
il

sia

proprio.

British School at Rome.

The

158

Notai

un luogo Riquadrato

era

ui

intorno fatto con Ogni

e secondo la qualita delli frutti cosl erano

che

la

Bona Memoria

Cardinale Santafiore

111"^

dell'

ui

Sig.

Roma

da

e bello Musaico,

un Brauo,
coloriti di

Reu"'

mando

Palmi con un festone

di quindici

sorte di frutti possibili,

degno

si

lauoro,

Guido Ascanio Sforza


mulattieri,

molti

et

altri

Musaico era largo

Musaico, il festone di d
d''
li quali portano
ciascun cantone del quadro ui era una
per
Mezzo,
e
Palmi
e
da due
Maschera le quali faceuano tutte diuersi effetti di uago, e Raro lauoro,
sottoposta a
e nel Mede(si)mo luogo ui sono sottoposto quattro Logge una

huomini

Tramontana uerso
a

Leuante,

Sabina,

la

secondo a Mezzo Giorno

quarta sugetta a ponente, e

la

Ma

Artifitio.

la

Luoghi

diuersi

in

d*

di

Uilla

[f 8i]

La Terza

con grande

fatte

tutte

Ui furono trouate una


non dico Brecce

crran quantita di Brecce Orientali dico cosa Nobilissima,

tanta gran quantita che elle faceuano piu di Uenticinque


some, e ciascheduna soma pesava piu di ducento libre, le quali furno
vendute in Roma a Molti e diuersi huomini per tre scudi la Soma per

ma

gioie, era

non
le

conosciute,

essere

uoleuano

haueuano

piu

furono

che

Mila

Venticinque

di

conosciute

da

Scudi,

ne ho uiste
io
donata una da Messer Gio.

infinite,

cognittione,

delle quali ne

doppo

fii

le

stimano che
che

huomini
tocche

Dom

ne

Mano

coi

Ciaccia a un

certo Me Uincenzo Mancini da Tivoli dottore, et Auuocato in Roma


Giuocare a
la quale si ritroua di una grossezza simile ad una palla da
Maglio, uaga, e polita che la traspare come gioia .... Ui furono

trouate anche in
certe

di

Villa sotto

e Medaglia di

Monete

Luogho

d-'^

M^

una Loggia

Argento

di

Valore di un Giulio L' una,

Brigante Colonna, sotto

Pirro

una gran quantita

[f 8i^]

d*^

Villa

di

in

di

un

Quintilio,

quale Luogho egli fu destinato per Piantarui


il
Gentilhomo Tiburtino
delle Vigne dato a Lauorare a diuersi homini della Citta di Tiuoli, e
un di quei Contadini Lauoratore Abruzzese Trouo le d^ Monete il
;

quale

come

si
si

fuggi da Tiuoli, e

Benche

se ne

ritrouano alcune con

Nomi

li

intendera qui sotto con alcune anche Belle imprese antique con

suoi Riuersi

li

C'CASSIVS

quali Meritano di essere notati

II

come

qui Uedrete.

Riuerso un Carro Tirato a quattro con una

Roma
109

di sopra.

B.C.

/igue,

i.

(C. Cassius Longinus,

Babelon,

325.)

Monnaies de

la

about

Repub-

::

Roman Campagna. II.

Classical Topograph v of the

P-CRASSVS-M-F-

Riuerso una Testa di donna con Pendente

II

Orecchio.

al

about 58

Licinius

(P.

Babelon,

B.C.:

Crassus

II

Riuerso una donna con

FAVSTVS LATINVS

II

Riuerso un Carro con quattro

una

con

figura

(Faustus

Cornelius

Babelon,

Una Palma

mano.

64

about

Sulla,

Mano.

in

B.C.

422.)

i.

guardano

suo Riuerso quattro Caualli che

II

in

Caualli con

Palma

la

Dives,

134.)

ii.

ROMA

PANSA

159

un Carro, con una Figura con Palma

Mano.

II

Figura

scrisse

Ii

'
.

suoi

Palma

con

sopra

ii.

in

B.C.

doppo

Un

Mesi

certi

Mano.
184

(L.
B.C.:

195.)

Varo doppo che

io

ne

Gentilhomo Citadino

di

In la Mede(si)ma Villa di Quintilio

Vestigij,

in

about

Censorinus,

Babelon,

82^]

90

ii.

Marcius

[f.

about

Pansa,

537 sqq^
Riuerso un Carro con quattro Caualli una
Babelon,

CENSVR

Vibius

(C.

Tiuoli chiamato M'' Ercole Ciaccia facendoui

Lauorare per Piantarui una

Vigna Oue

Statue, Colonne, Capitelli di

Marmo

Ma

si

ritrouano Troncini diuersi.

et oltra di

questo

che dalle due Parti

poi tonda, in la quale


diro

un

sii

alto della

ui

sii

si

fii

la

ritrouata

Cima

uiddero di

Colonna

si

una Colonna

Belli,

Notabili Sugetti

et

uedeua un poco

ferro che sustineua qualche Bella

alta dodici

Palmi

ritrouaua a guisa di Piramide dico

si

Vano oue
che

al

si

mezzo

oliue Attaccate in certi

Colonna si uedeuano Sei Grillande


doppo si uede un Bastone alto tre Palmi
portare Ii Sig" Caporioni Romani quando
di

di

Ma

impresa

come

gli

ritrouaua
della

d''

Tronconi

simile a quelli che soleuano


si

faceua

il

Gran Trionfo

Gioco di Testaccio auuoltoui a d Bastone uno Sciugatoio, Sotto poi si


uedono sei figurine di Mezzo Rilievo compartite Tuna auante I'altra alte da
quattro Palmi incirca con

le

dispositione uestite poi con

somiglianza di Angeli

Braccia Aperte
Ii

in the

in

Vatican

83] e le

Gambe

dislargate in

suoi panni, et uesti suelte le quali sono in


'

Domenico De Angelis excavated here


Montanara'

[f.

in the olive plantation called

'

La

1773 and 1776, and found a statue of Mercury as a boy (now


Miis. Pio Clementino, Rome, 1782, vol. i. p. 6,

Visconti,

;:

The

i6o

British School at Rome.

and a nude statue of a freedman (Bulgarini, op. cit. 96). Other


excavations made on the same site by VescovaH in 1820 resulted in the
tav. V.)

discovery of two Fauns (now

in

the Vatican), a seated statue of Jupiter, a

small Bacchus, and other fragrhents (Bulgarini, ibid.\ Sebastian!, op. cit. 92)
while in 1825 a statue of a sitting female was found in the villa, which is

now

Cambridge (Fitzwilliam Museum,

in

to the railway line,

is

has once more returned to use, and

Acqua Marcia
it

Pia.

having three

as

palms

in

now

aisles

and 24

it

villa,

close

with water; this

serves as a clearing tank for the

pilasters,

with a

( ?

1728, describes

total

in the vault nearest to the

diameter, to admit the water

and

tilation),

Above the

Revillas in his diary for Sept. 30,

paces and a width of 13 paces


2

no. 36).

the large reservoir which supplied

more probably

length of 46

end wall a

hole,

a hole for ven-

at the foot of the wall at the opposite end a hole for

exit, leading to a

its

conduit about i^ palm in diameter.

was supplied in Roman times


solely with spring-water, or whether the water of the Anio was also taken
For along the course of the Strada di Quintiliolo, which leads from
into it.
uncertain

It is

whether

this reservoir

two aqueducts are traceable.


One, which derives its water from a spring near the monastery of S. Angelo
this villa
in Piavola, may be seen running above the modern road towards
formed
being
it
whole
of
the
deep,
20
by
the specus was open, 22 cm. wide
(measuring
shaft
vertical
48
by a continuous channel of concrete. The
by 63 cm.) by which the water fell into the reservoir was preserved until
Tivoli to this villa on the N. side of the Anio,

was destroyed. An arch of about 18 feet span crossing


a small gully by the road was removed when the railway was made.
The other, which was fed by the Anio, is larger, and runs beneath the
road its mouth was found in 1835, near the upper end of the new tunnels
which now convey the water of the Anio through the rock and over the

when

1903,

it

new

(See Folchi, Diss. Accad. Pont. Arch. vi. 64 Nibby, Analisi, iii.
The specus was cut in the solid rock, but vaulted with masonry, large

fall.

213.)

X 0-53 metre) forming, where the rock


It measured 2-5 metres high by 2 wide,
failed, the sides and bottom also.
and its floor was 5 metres above the present river level. At intervals of 14
blocks of Gabine stone (r25

0-53

had rectangular putei of brickwork, measuring on an average


073 X 0-5 metre. After 54 metres from its mouth there was a distribution
tank divided into four branches, two on each side, each i metre to 17
metre wide. The specus was found to be entirely choked with the heavy
metres

it

Classical Topography of the

Roman Campagna. II.

deposit formed by the water, and fragments of sepulchral cippi

found

in

About 30 metres

it.

N.W. of the

to the

aqueduct and on a slightly higher

i6i

were also

shaft of the smaller

level there is a

round-headed channel of
concrete in the hillside 176 metre wide, the sides of which are encrusted
with a dirty brown deposit about 3 cm. thick. This is traceable for at
least

20 yards, and runs

in

the direction of the railwayman's house (casello)

N.E. of the Villa of Ouintilius Varus.

it

It

and may only have been a

either direction,

cannot be followed further

cistern

but

if it is

in

an aqueduct

should probably be connected with the larger of the two which we have

At

just described.

the point where the Strada di Quintiliolo leaves the

highroad into the town, yet another aqueduct specus has recently come
to light, measuring 85 centimetres in width, and 95 in height as far as
preserved (the roof has not been found)

its

sides

and

floor are constructed

of bad concrete, the former being 45 and 49 cm. thick, the latter 30. The
specus is full of dirt, and much deposit has been used in the concrete of
the walls.

It

runs 20 degrees N. of E., and

its

date

quite uncertain.

is

Half a mile to the E. of the Villa of Ouintilius Varus is the former


monastery of S. Antonio, the residence of the late Mr. F. A. Searle. The
villa upon which this building is erected is of considerable size, and parts of
it

are

still in

still

well preserved.

good preservation

two or three of the rooms mosaic floors are


one of them, which has a floor of white tesserae

In
(in

laid longitudinally, there are

two round blocks of travertine

bases of columns, each 44 cm. in diameter, and


the lowest storey there

apse at the end


(Fig. 17).

The

is

n5

to support the

metre apart), and

in

a well-preserved rectangular chamber,^ with an

the apse was decorated with rough mosaic and sea-shells

walls are double, as a protection against

with opus incertum which

is

damp, and faced

almost sufficiently regular to be called reticu-

is interesting as showing how the latter was derived from the


and
the sides were decorated with columns carrying an entablature,
former:
but having no structural function, as the roof is supported by a barrel vault

latum, and

resting on the side walls.

Below the monastery

the garden

in

cannot locate the excavations described in Bull. Inst. 1832,


Sig. Arduini ha cavato alcuni pezzi di cornice di rosso antico
1

6,

'

is

a double

Nelle vicinanze di Tivoli

due piccole colonne, ed un


pavimento di marmo palombino a scacchi.'
- Nibby, op. cit. iii. 221, speaks of remains of marble facing slabs
and stucco in some of the
rooms, and Antonini {Manuale di vari ornaviaiti, ii. 24, 25) gives two rosettes from fragments of

il

ancient sculptures preserved here.


' This chamber measures 10 metres in width by 8 in length, not including the
apse, which
4 '5 metres in diameter.

is

The

i62

British School at Rome.

terrace wall consisting of


built against

it,

Cyclopean masonry behind, with opus reticulatum

the latter with buttresses and niches alternating.

wall of Cyclopean work

at a slightly higher level

and being only 34 metres

Lower down again

villa.

rough

of doubtful antiquity,

is

cannot belong to another terrace of the

distant,

another terrace of opus reticulatum, and

is

in

other parts of the garden are other remains of substructures, so arranged as

The

to afford the finest views of the gorge.

villa

was supplied with water

from the upper of the two aqueducts mentioned above, by a vertical shaft

end of the building.^

at the E.

The

villa at S.

Antonio

No

poet Horace.

generally supposed to have belonged to the

is

allusions in his

own

writings bear out this supposition

he was clearly very fond of Tibur, and was often there, but that does not

imply that he possessed a

villa

of his own.

But the writer of the Life of

Horace, generally attributed to Suetonius, says {Siietonii opera ed. Roth,


p.

298,

23),

1.

domusque

vixit

'

Tiburni which
87. 237),

plurimum

is

mentioned by Horace

and Statius {Silvae

supposed to have been near


at

Tibur at
in

cit.)

all,

secessu ruris sui Sabini aut Tiburtini,

in

there

is

3.

i.

(6Vzr;.

is

74)

Angelo

S.

The

Tiburni hiculuin!

eins ostenditur circa

site

not known, though

in

Piavola

but, if

of the Lucus

Pliny {H.N. xvi.

13),

7.

i.

it

is

generally

Horace had a

villa

no other site that so well justifies the words {Carm.

which he praises the beauties of the place

Me

'
:

nee tam patiens

Lacedaemon, nee tam Larissae percussit campus opimae, quam domus


Albuneae resonantis, et praeceps Anio, et Tiburni lucus, et uda mobilibus
pomaria

On

rivis.'

Tiburtini' finds a

the other hand, the expression

good

parallel

seu Sabine, seu Tiburs,

nam

cordi Catullum laedere

in

ruris sui

Catullus, Epigr. xliv.,

te esse

Sabini aut

'O funde

noster,

Tiburtem autumant quibus non

quibus cordi

et

'

est,

est

quovis Sabinum pignore esse

contendunt,' and would thus seem to refer to the country house or farm

which Horace possessed


^

the valley of the Digentia (now Licenza).-

in

In the garden at S. Antonio

copied two brick stamps,

TONEI-DE

QVHST-

CAECINA EXOCHI

and
I

known.
The former, (tegii/a) Toneiana de {figlinis\
two brickworks in one stamp, which seems to occur only
Tonneianae are concerned, and for which no explanation has yet been found

neither of which appears to be otherwise

Qnint(ianis),

is

a case of the mention of

where the figlinae


(C.J.L. XV.
2

M.

p.

188).

The combination with XhepgHnie Qtdntianae


was actually within the
but see Dessau {C.I.L. xiv. p. 368).

Jullian maintains that this farm

rEcolefran^aise, 1883, 82)

is

new

one.

territory of

Tibur {Melanges de


Roman Campagna. II.

Classical Topography of the

The concluding

163

awkward and two later passages


Cann. ii. 18. 12, 'nee potentem amicum largiora flagito satis beatus unicis
Sabinis,' and ibid. iii. i. 47, cur valle permutem Sabina divitias operosiores
seem to show that Horace had but one country house. If the clause is
clause

therefore

is

'

'

genuine (and there seems no reason to suspect


of the

MSS.

though Wickham,

goes,

as far as the evidence

it,

Horace,

his edition of

in

18,

p.

i.

considers the form of statement to be quite consistent with the idea that
the passage

an interpolation) the word ostendiUir

is

may have been made,

the identification

delectation of the tourist, as well in the

One argument that


man of

too large for a


it

is

day of Suetonius as

used against the current theory

it

fact, for

the

at present.

that

the villa

is

as,

though

was rather below the average

size of

Horace's means

was by no means a small house,

remarkable

still

is

without foundation in

will

hardly hold water,

the villas of the district.

Five hundred yards E. of


is
till

Antonio, higher up on the mountain slope,

S.

the Casale S. Angelo, where the church of S. Angelo in Piavola stood


1822.

the traditional site of the Villa of Catullus, but there

This

is

for

the

no reason

though the

supposition,

ancient capitals and columns exist there, and

i.

94 sqq)}

Below

remains of a reservoir, which

down

some

monastery (Searle

built into the walls of the

Arch. Soc.

it,

seems to

site

in

or

may

Journal

not be of

is

Cabral and del

Re

{pp. cit.

in

the time of

and Amer.

Brit,

a fountain, with the

Roman

again, near the river, at a place called Truglia,^

marbles were discovered

Further

date.

pavements of various

Antonio del Re

{op.

90) speak of similar discoveries, and

cit.

but as they give no


found,

is

it

114);

also of the

finding of a column, on which female figures were sculptured in low


details as to the precise site

is

ancient

travertine voussoirs are

close to the road,

may

be

relief,

where these objects were

impossible to say whether they refer to the same spot, or

to excavations

made

and the modern

nearer to the Casale S. Angelo.^

road, close to the great

fall

structions of another villa, of rough concrete,

Below

S.

Angelo

of the Anio, are the .sub-

and

this is

perhaps the

site

referred to.

Nearer

still

to

Tivoli opposite,

in fact, to the

two temples,

in

the gardens

which now occupy the slopes are the remains of large substructures
^

Cf. also Antonini, op.

No

cit.

ii.

23.

doubt the 'fundum trulias' of the Bull of 978 {supra, 129, n.).
In the church of S. Angelo existed the inscriptions C.I.L. xiv. 3544, 3662.

in

The

64

British School at Rome.

opus reticulatum which the writers on Tivoli generally identify with the
Canina, Edif. vi. tav. 136).
3
Villa of Vopiscus (Statius, Silvac,
From Tivoli to the Villa of Ouintilius Varus, though the road must
i.

follow an ancient line,

it

now

presents no traces of antiquity, though

29) speaks of traces of substructures in irregular opus qiiadratiim opposite the Cascatelle, and again near a chapel of the Saviour
Not very far to the N. of the
(probably above the new fall of the Anio).

Promis

villa,

{op. cit.

however, and considerably above

it,

close to the southern entrance of

the railway tunnel, the remains of an ancient road, winding along the slope
of the mountain, and followed very closely by the modern railway, which
as a rule runs just below

it,

The upper

begin to appear.

generally cut into the side of the slope, while the lower side

side of
is

is

it

sometimes

more often supported by a wall of rough


Cyclopean work, or, in one place, by two such walls, 1-4 and r2 metre in
metre thick between them
thickness respectively, with a bank of earth
The width of the road itself is 37 metres. A little beyond
(Figs. 18, 19).

also cut in the rock, but

is

the^N. end of the tunnel are the remains of a small two-arched bridge, the
The span must
piers of which seem to have been of Cyclopean work.

have been about 27 metres, the width of the bridge about 6 metres.

The road

clearly traceable until

is

Vitriano, to the S. of a

opus reticulatum, called Grotte

known as
Drago in 1847

Colli

also

it

reaches a point E. of the Casale

platform, with vaulted substructures in

large villa

di Scalzacane.

The surrounding

are

hills

Excavations made here by Prince del

Farinelli.

resulted in the discovery of architectural fragments,

also the brickstamp C.I.L. xv. 2382 (Bulgarini, op.

cit.

loi,

etc.,

who apparently

attributes it to the second century; Viola, Tizwli nel Decennio 1 835-1 845,
Not far to the N. is another large
Giorn. Arcad. cxxv. (185 1), 163).
233 n.
;

villa

platform with walls of opus incertum.

road are scantier, but


half a mile S. of

the

line,

its

section

Palombara

is

station,

To

where
the

road, a few

W.

it

its

it

soon reappears on the

W.

supporting wall on the E. as

villa, to

of
it

the E. extremity of the Colle

stops {infra, \'J2)}

of and considerably below the

hundred

first

traces of this ancient

yards to the N. of the Villa of Ouintilius Varus, are

the remains of another


1

and

and may be clearly traced by

ascends, past the remains of a large


Turrita,

After this point traces of the

clearly seen in the railway cutting about

villa,

known

as the Villa of Ventidius Bassus.

Since the above description was written the road has been almost entirely destroyed.

It

Roman Campagna. II.

Classical TopOGRAniv of the

165

has three large platforms, the lower supported by a wall of opus reticulatum, the second by a wall of polygonal work, which faces westward and

The polygonal work

northward.

Roman

obviously of

is

The

date.

horizontal line seems to be intentionally avoided, and, though the joints are

very fine and mortar

The

rough.

left

much

still

remains

them, the faces have been purposely

in

blocks vary considerably

in

size

some of them are as


The wall

metre long, while others are only 46 by 44 cm.


appears to have been 175 m. thick.
as

I'S

In front of the best-preserved portion, which

the centre of the

in

is

platform, there has been a concrete wall in two thicknesses, the inner 24,

the outer 57 cm., which does not seem to have risen to any considerable

height above the present ground


S.,

however, there

is

level, as

it

has a

which masks the polygonal work altogether, and has

way

travertine placed in such a

window of

Further to the

flat top.

a piece of concrete walling faced with opus incertum


in

it

two blocks of

that they very likely formed the sides of a

a cryptoporticus.

There have been further alterations

at this level

the polygonal wall

originally turned at right angles at the N. end of the terrace, but

was

later

almost entirely hidden at the N.W. angle by the addition of lofty arched
substructures in opus reticulatum, which carried a comparatively small
structure set

askew with the

The uppermost

tower.

traceable.

of the

rest

Re

Cabral and del

all

probability a view

confetti di Tivoli,' fantastically

'

may

pieces of calcareous deposit, which

Returning to the path to

S.

still

be seen

Pastore and Vitriano,

remains of ancient buildings which

lie

is still

106) speak of a chamber decorated

(o/>. cit.

with sea-shells and the so-called

At

villa, in

terrace has almost entirely disappeared, but

in

it.

we may examine

on the W. side of

the Casale Mantellate, about half a mile

W.

formed
the

it.

of the road, and not far

from the path to Ponte Lucano mentioned supra, 152, are some fragments
of mediocre statuary.
Over the gateway is a female head of white marble
in a

rough decorative style

while on each side of the door

represents a youth, undraped, and


is

dressed high, and the

may

be represented.

cut out, and the back

and represents a
figure

is

left

The
left

Roman

fully draped.

is

is

a statue

preserved as far as the hips

one

the hair

forefinger held to the lips, so that Harpocrates

statue

rough.

is

unfinished, the

The

other statue

left
is

arm not being

quite

even more imperfect,

with a short curling beard and whiskers

the

The

i66

To

British School at Rome.

the E. of the Casale are traces of the platform of a

while a few

villa,

hundred yards to the W. are two mediaeval towers side by side, enclosed
within a wall the foundations of which are of opus reticulatum. Just to the

S.W. of these are extensive subterranean chambers

opus reticulatum and

in

brickwork, reached by a narrow passage faced with opus reticulatum

they

are roofed with gable roofs of cement set with planks, and probably served
as reservoirs.

Close by, in making a vineyard, at the beginning of 1899, slabs of

pavement were found

travertine from a

we saw
any

a cippus in

2 or

3 feet,

measuring 0'64 x 0*44 metre, facing

situ

inscription that there

that several

depth of

at a

may have been had

more such had been found,

in

perished.

We

N.,

and
but

were told

which case the pavement

may

have been that of a sacred enclosure or of a courtyard belonging to a tomb.


A coin of uncertain date which we acquired was said to have been found

We

with a dead body.

also

saw some travertine columns, and a fine


all four sides, and probably

oblong pilaster of white marble, fluted on


therefore belonging to

To
in

W.

the

some small

opus reticulatum

aiid brick

brickstamp C.I.L. xv. 983b


a

tomb was found,

follows

shrine.

the Casale Bellini, where in 1893 the remains of a villa

is

were discovered, with several copies of the


half of

(first

century A.U.), while

first

built of blocks of travertine,

1894

in

with an inscription as

HYGIA
MVRDIAE PHIALE
NVTRICI SVAE
This

may

The

district

be seen on the spot {Not. Scav. 1893, 520

still

called

is

to the church of

Sebastiani

S.

Favale,^ so that not far

Silvestro,

108)

cit.

{pp.

II

1894,

146).

a vineyard belonging

off, in

were discovered the sarcophagi of which

speaks

they were three

in

number, of white

marble, two plain, and one of them with undulating channels (the technical

term

for

which

is

'

strigils

')

having figures roughly carved

in

bad style

in

the centre and at the corners, of which those at the corners represent two

Teraphim, so that a Hebrew was probably buried

To
fine

the N.

villa

'

is

the

Campo

were discovered not

The name

far

occurs in a Bull of Anastasius

from

in

it.

in

1846 the remains of a very

the

Ponte dei Prati (probably

Limpido, where

\\ (1153-1154), Bruzza,

op. cit. p. 76,

1.

9.

Roman Campagna. II.

Classical Topography of the

dei Prati to the


inscription
slabs,

Map

by the Staff

that called

W.

167

the Ponte delle Vigne, and not the Ponte

of Colle Nocelle)

bath and a lead pipe with the

Tito Sabidio,' and also an aqueduct, paved with travertine

'

which branched

off into

two channels (Bulgarini,

XV. 7906); C.I.L. XV. 7908, found in 1847

'

100

op. cit.

C.I.L,

and bearing

nei piani di Tivoli,'

may also have been found here.


Campo Limpido, on the further side of the Fosso

the inscription 'P. Sabid(io),'

To

the N. of the

S. Pastore,

is

the

the remains of

Nocelle, which

called Colle

hill

At

villas.

the S. end

is

a large

literally

is

villa,

di

covered with

with two terraces, just

below which are the scattered remains of a tomb discovered

in

1822

it

had a cella of blocks of travertine,^ with a portico of marble, covered


with

of marble, with antefixae carved in good style.

tiles

Upon

the epistyle of the portico was the inscription C.I.L. xiv. 3735

(Sebastiani, op.

cit.

Some

418).

C.I.L. xiv. 3617, are

still

fragments of

this,

and also the

inscription

on the spot, though Dessau was unable

to be seen

to find either of them.

The lower terrace of the villa is supported by a wall of Cyclopean


work with very strong tendencies towards opus quadratum (masked in
At the W. end of this wall
places by rough opus reticulatum), facing S.
another wall goes to the N.

pudding

stone,

which

is

it is

at first of

with limestone quoins about 80 yards


the main wall, and, like

opus quadratum of plum-

soon succeeded by a stretch of opus reticulatum

it,

facing

S., is

in

length.

About

a wall of large, not quite rectangular

blocks, of which only two courses are visible above ground.

however, smooth-faced, whereas

Above

this villa,

in the

25 yards N. of

The

main wall some faces are

near the top of the

hill, is

blocks are,
left

bossed.

a large subterranean water

measurements of which are 29-65 metres in length,


with three aisles respectively 3-30, 346, and 3-40 metres in width, divided
by two rows of eight pillars, each 90 by 80 cm. The intervals between the

reservoir, the internal

very irregular.

pillars are

formed of

On

tiles

the

W.

To

the N. of

it

a late cemetery with tombs

has recently been found.


slope

of the

hill

is

an enormous

W.N.W., with a facing of massive blocks of

villa

.stone,

platform looking

which approximates

closely to opus quadratum, since, especially in the buttresses,


1

Some

of these were, according to Bulgarini, op.

cit.

many

loi, used for the edge of the

of the

new

fall

of

It had two
foundations have recently been cleared, and its plan brought to light.
chambers both 4-1 metres wide inside, the one 4-43 metres long, the other 2-35, with a door

the Anio.

Its

connecting them.

British School at Rome.

The

i68

blocks are nearly rectangular, though horizontal bedding is not uniformly


maintained, and the lower angle of one block is sometimes let into the

upper surface of the next below


fine

the bossing

is

obviously

Porta Maggiore {Papers,

i.

The

it.

jointing of the stones

and

artificial,

is

extremely

work of the

resembles the rustica

bossing projects about 9 cm., with a flat


apparently, not employed. At each
is,
Mortar

The

50).

edge of 9 cm. all round.


angle are buttresses two

at the

each measuring V2 metre

in

N.N.W.

thickness,

angle, five at the

W.S.W.

angle,

and projecting r8 metre from the

The wall is preserved to a maximum height of 47


metres (Fig. 20). Upon the terrace are marble and brick lying loose, and
of a cottage
at the S. angle are some remains of opus incertum in the wall
Descriptions
and
Vieivs
but the rest of the villa has disappeared. Dodwell (
The plan here
of Cydopian Remains, pi. 122) gives a sketch of the terrace.

face of the

main

wall.

shown

is

from

my own

measurements.

"u

At

the N. end of the

hill

above the other, both facing


measuring

11

vaulted roof

96 by

is

N.,

3'63 metres,

The lower

seen in the section of

it

yet another

villa,

with two terraces, one

and on the upper one a water


and

metres

2-9

in

reservoir,

height to the top of the

may

wall was faced with opus reticulatum, as

which faces E.

the N. wall

has lost

its

be

facing

while the upper wall was constructed of opus incertum.

Upon

the lower terrace are various

decorations of the

villa,

and many socket

fragments of the
pipes,

architectural

which were probably used

to support the floors of hypocausts, or else built into the thickness of the

walls as drain-pipes from the roofs.

Sebastiani

{op.

cit. p.

418, n.)

tells

us

Classical Topography of the


(who

that the brothers Cocconari

of the

hill)

found some

two male

We

On

pavements

mosaic

road

the E. of the

paratively scanty; there

to

end

at the S.

and also

here,

C.I.L. xv. 2548).

remains of

Pastore

S.

one large

is

169

found here a terracotta plaque with

and the maker's name, OCTAVI (cf

figures

tomb

also discovered the

good

fairly

the inscription C.I.L. xiv. 3626.

Roman Campagna. II.

villa to

com-

are

villas

the E.S.E. of the

Casale

now known

as the

Cocconari, generally called the Villa di Cocceio, and

Grotte di Corzano, with a platform facing W., supported by a wall of opus

To

reticulatum.

somewhat

theatre,

like a

known

building

N. of this

the

as

which

Pastore

S.

a cutting

is

probably

is

at the

lies

the

in

a quarry.

end of the

rock,

shape

in

The mediaeval
straight path we

have been following, to the E. of the N. extremity of the Colle Nocelle.

At

the foot of the knoll on which

lies

it

At

the path divides.

Pastore

S.

the following fragment of an inscription, cut in good lettering upon a slab

of

Luna

was

marble,

found

1898

in

mpeius

nae flam

uccic

Just to the

of the

hill, is

Scav.

{Not.

1898,

284)

S.W.

wall, 34

in length, of fine

metres

clearly trace-

is

Cyclopean work, the

preserved for

is still

length to a

maximum

a tank sunk below the ground level, measuring

metres, and at least

height of r8

1-40

covered with cement (Fig.


there are also

deep

metre.

some

hill

fluted

columns of travertine coated with

lies

half a mile to the N.

are the remains of a very large

ing wall, 52-4 metres in length

and the S.E. side


^

This

is

towards the Colle di

the S.W. corner of this

hill

villa, with two terraces.- The lower supporton the S.W. front (the N.W. side being 14-8

metres long),

shown on the map.


from Lesley to Lupi, describing a

preserved in Cod.

campo,

10-5

At

and on

is

constructed of concrete faced with

not

letter

viddi quel

to Casale Battista,

to the N.E. are possible traces of a road

Vitriano, which

247 by 87

the upper platform are traces of opus

stucco, which probably belonged to this villa.


An ancient road perhaps led from S. Pastore

the

whole

the blocks show traces of having been

Upon

21).

its

In front of this wall, on a lower

terrace,

a rectangular platform, the outline of which

blocks having smooth faces and good joints,

incertum

W. of the upper Casale Vitriano, a Jittle way below the summit

able, while the

is

'

.'

marmo

Vat. Lat. 9143,

f.

89.

In

it

visit

che Marco havea fatto scavare.

e di piu rotto in vari luoghi.'

context that the reference

is

No

not to the villa

to this villa,

and dated May

the following passage occurs

ieri

L'avevano sepelito di nuovo

further description
itself.

'
:

is

given, and

it

is

8th,

fui

in

1732, is
a Vitriano,

mezzo

di

un

clear from the

I/O

The

limestone blocks,

in

British School at Rome.

Cyclopean work

horizontal arrangement as to
well jointed

along the front

At

The upper
even

The height of the lower platform is about 7"5 metres


N.W. end a wall of reticulatum runs on for 13 metres more.
to

Dodwell,

is

constructed of Cyclopean work, approximating

opus quadratum

op. cit. pi. 123,

the lower terrace, which

ments of very
remarkable

2 feet square,

wall.

its

more nearly

Upon

Small buttresses about

vertical line of rectangular blocks, occur at intervals

terrace wall

incertum.

so

and the faces smooth.

formed by a single
(Fig. 22).

marked a tendency to
be almost opus quadratum the blocks are
with

fine

marbles of

is

all

At

for its magnificence.

it

masked

is

in

places

by opus

gives a side view of the upper terrace.

about
kinds,

metres

in depth, are

showing that the

frag-

was

villa

the S. corner of the terrace are the

remains of the furnace of a hypocaust.

Here

found part of a brick bear-

amphora and on each side the


letters TI CL.
A precisely similar stamp was recently found by us at a
Roman villa near Saccomuro in the upper Anio valley, not far from Castelmadama. To the E. of, and above, this villa is a reservoir in concrete.
ing a circular stamp, with a bird above an

Further E. again, on the E. slope of the

hill,

and overlooking the railway,

are the remains of another villa; and in the field near point 169 are large

blocks of travertine,

some

still

in situ.

Vitriano has been the scene of

many

discoveries, but their site

sufficiently accurately indicated to enable us to be certain

were made near the Casale Vitriano or on the Colle


(

Cortofia,

Tebaldi of a large

and very

(in

Diss,

182 sqq.) of the excavation by Furietti and

ii.

villa

not

Volpi

di Vitriano.

Vetus Latium, x. 382) speaks of the discovery of tombs, and

deir Accad. di

is

whether they

facing S. and W.,

remains of marble (very

with

three

large

platforms

on the
Here were discovered a statuette
of a nude boy seated on a wine-skin from which a jet of water flowed,
marble pavements, and architectural fragments of all sorts, also a brick
bearing the stamp C.I.L. xv. 1849.
Cabral and del Re {op. cit. 80)
rich

S.W. side of the Colle

di

likely, therefore, the villa

Vitriano).

speak of the discovery of various antiquities

remains of a large

villa (very

possibly

the

in

ploughing

same), and

among

of the

fall

the
in

1778 of part of the substructures, which brought to light some of the


marble pavement of a room. In Stevenson's MS. notes {Vat. Lat. 10552,
f 21) there
('

is

promemoria

an extract from a paper


in

arch.

bibl.

Vat.

in the archives of the

carte sciolte

'),

Vatican

librar>'

dated April 2nd, 1780,

Roman Campaona. II.

Classical Topography of the

171

describing the discovery in the excavations at Vitriano of a small but rare


silver coin of

'

John usurper of the Western Empire,' and of long drums

of columns of bigio lumachellato, about 48 cm.

neighbourhood was discovered

In this

Re

del

in

diameter.

C.I.L.

xiv.

give a detailed account of the discovery and destruction of C.I.L.

by Brunelleschi

3777, but the inscription had already been copied

xiv.

about 1513,

how

Piazza di Tivoli,' and

nella

'

existence, though the inscription

have travelled to

can

it

and, further, it is
is not known
somewhat damaged, at Frascati

Vitriano, been lost and then rediscovered,


still in

Cabral and

3596.

is

{C.I.L. at.).

To
S.

the

W.

of the Colle di Vitriano

extremity of which

is

church, are the remains of a large

villa,

is

of opus reticulatum and

apart from centre to centre

marked by

between the
these again

hill

and

this

upper

of the

pilasters 8 feet

metre high, which are 6

'oy

Above them

to the N.

the specus which supplied

below

the capitals are gone, but their places are

band of opus reticulatum

Higher up the

slope,

the retaining wall

are

it,

in

height,

and above

2 feet high.

ground

a water reservoir, sunk below

is

0'4

feet

arches over the spaces

flat

with stone voussoirs a foot

pilasters

is

W.

was decorated with

slabs of stone 2 feet long

apart from edge to edge.

level

on the

which, to judge from the fragments

of marble, was very finely decorated


terrace

the Colle Sant' Antonio, upon the

is

a mediaeval church

metre

the ridge between the two summits of the

in width,

is still

On

visible.

are the remains of a road

hill

N.N.W which was supported by low walls of rectangular blocks


of stone. To the N.W. again, on the W. slope, below the northern summit,
running

and

just

above the stream which here runs

remains of another
reservoir, circular

platform, upon which

villa

at

one end, bisected along

which carried a vauJt on each side of


Bull.

1838, 50

Inst.

S.

(cf.

1837,

in

21),

it.

of the railway
is

line,

are the

a ruined rectangular water

its

whole length by a wall

The excavations

which were

described in

found architectural

them belonging to the latest period of the Roman


building
must have undergone restoration), and the
(when
the
Empire

fragments,

many

inscription

C.I.L.

i.

484, and Gell,

(which they

call

of

xiv.

op. cit.

3615, were
176,

probably made here.

both speak of a large

villa

Nibby,

op.

upon these

the Colli Farinelli), citing the spurious inscription

cit.

hills

C.I.L.

xiv. 406*.

To

the N. of the railway, on the

W.

slopes of the Colle del Tesoro, are

The

172

the remains of another

facing W., which has three terraces, one above

villa,

the lowest retaining wall

the other

way

the middle wall

line,

British School at Rome.

(Fig. 23), while the

is

is

traceable a

little

way above

the

rail-

of polygonal work and very well preserved

uppermost

Remains of other

of opus incertum.

is

villas exist at several points between the Colle del Tesoro and the Colle

Turrita, but they hardly require individual mention.

In the construction

of the railway two unimportant inscriptions {C.I.L. xiv. 3756, 3878) were

discovered below the Colle Turrita

the remains of a tomb, with one

in

Upon

or two other unimportant objects {Not. Scav. 1884, 160).

extremity of the Colle Turrita

we saw

which, as

(to

road leads) are the remains of a mediaeval


built in places

The

castle.

upon walls of Cyclopean work, which from

walls of this are

their character

position appear to belong to a system of fortification (Fig. 24)

was probably a small

this

however, no

from

road

ancient

fortified

name can be

outpost of Tibur

given. ^

It is

up

leads

Tivoli

the E.

supra, 164, an ancient

and

so that

in early times, to

which,

a very noticeable fact that the


to

point

this

and

then

ends

abruptly.^

Aefula {supra, 132) was another such outpost on the


(Vicovaro) on

Empulum

the

and Varia

guarding the road up the Anio valley, while

N.E.,

(perhaps identical with Empiglione, though Dessau {C.I.L. xiv.

362) somewhat contemptuously rejects the

p.

S.,

idea)

and the

site

now

occupied by the village of Ciciliano were the outlying fortresses on the E.,
1

Dodwell

The

calls

it

Medullia, but without adequate reason {infra, 175, 183).

shows some differences from that of the


but though the
There has been, it is true, a certain amount of weathering
joints were originally good and the faces of the blocks fairly smooth, there is not the extreme
on the other hand, there is no intentional archaism, such as
fineness observable in the later work
that which leads to the bossing of the faces of the stones, and no positive avoidance of the horizontal
^

style of the walls at Turrita, if closely observed,

villas of the district.

line.

above.

The wall is I '28 metre in thickness: the blocks in


The material is pudding-stone quarried on the spot.

the foundation are larger than those

Mortar was not originally used, but

has been introduced with the addition of the mediaeval superstructure.

The

ancient walls are well preserved on the

projecting knoll joins the rest of the


there was an entrance at this point

but

little

The
S.

of

them

site

is

to

hill,

there

is

S.W. and W.

on the W., where alone

this

a slight projection in the line of the wall, as though

which would indeed

On

be the natural one.

the N. and E.

be seen.
to

W. and

cit.

p. 67,

measures (maximum measurements) 185 paces from E.


is almost the apex of a triangle.

70 paces from N. to

but the E. end

The name

Turrita occurs in a document of 1030 (Bruzza, op.

sancto iohannes qui est posito intro castello qui dicitur turrita'

and

1.

15),

'

de plebe de

also in a Bull of Anastasius

IV

{1153-1154), ecclesiam sancte romule de turrita.'


On the opposite side of the railway, on the slope to the N.E. of the station are foundations of
'

roads and walls in Cyclopean work, of which, in their present state, but

little

can be made.

Roman Campagna. II.

Classical Topography of the

commanding

the road which ran into the country of the Hernici

173

CiciHano

occupying an exceedingly strong position.

Livy

(vii.

Roman

the

9)

us

tells

that

people of Tibur refused

the

armies on their return from a campaign in 361

Hernici, in which they captured Ferentinum

and

B.C.

Sassula^ in 355 and 354 respectively

of them

this city in

To

{ib.

Rome
Empulum and

These outlying

18, 19).

receive

that, as a result,

declared war against Tibur, capturing the dependent cities of

all

to

against the

fortresses,

communication with Tibur by roads, show the strength of


the days of her independence, and the extent of her territory.
in

the N. of this

hill,

on the further side of the stream, are some caves


which have all the appearance of having origin-

in a cliff facing S. (Fig. 25),

and may form part of the necropolis of this early


summit of the hill above the tombs (which is called

ally served as tombs,

On

settlement.

the

the Colle Cigliano) are the remains of a large villa in Cyclopean

work and
opus incertum, with remains of a cryptoporticus on the S.W. and S.E.
Gell

{op. cit.

N.N.E.

133) identifies

it

with the

at Scocciasanta (point

site

To

of Caenina {supra, 65).

on the map)

221

is

another

the

with two

villa

terraces,

both supported by retaining walls of polygonal work, the upper of

which

remarkable as having

is

by

figured
is

Gell

{op. cit.

134

in

it

cf also

a curious aperture for drainage.

my

Fig. 26).

the upper terrace

a water reservoir.

The road which has been

Roman

would

period, one

followed from Tivoli to Turrita must in the

think,

have served the

and Palombara, and eventually have gone on

Monte

Libretti,

forming a very important

no certain traces of
its

Upon

It is

it ^

district

to join the

line of

communication.

(though there are some blocks which

paving) between the point where

it

of Marcellina

Via Salaria near

may

There are
belong to

ascends to Turrita and the cemetery

of Marcellina, but a road can be traced with certainty at one or two points
further N.,

and has apparently been only recently destroyed

places (Fonteanive,

Avanzi

Ciclopici, 62).

near point 245 there seems to be visible

two roads, one going


the other going

That the

"

The

site of this

reference

15 E. of S. (which

20"" S.

is

of E.

place

is

(I

in

To

the

the stream-bed the junction of

would be the road

was informed that the

quite uncertain

we have

in several

N.W. of the cemetery,


in

question) and

latter ran

towards

already seen [stipra, 134).

of course to the straight line taken by the track which has but recently been

superseded by the modern road with


quoted supra, 82, n.

its

curves and zig-zags.

See the passage of Nibby's Schede

The British School at Rome.

174

the water reservoir to the E. of the present highroad from Marcelh'na, and
that

it

had also been found on the N.W. side of the modern road coming

up from Ponte Lucano.)


Another argument for
and N. of the

its

antiquity

is

the fact that

it is

joined, to the S.

Scocciasanta, by other ancient roads, the one descend-

villa at

ing from the saddle between points 229 and 221, and not being traceable
further either S.E. or N.W., the other running from the villa at point 229

N.E. along the ridge, until it falls


the road of which we are speaking.

at

line of

an acute angle into the


In neither case

pavement

the

is

preserved, but the supporting walls are clearly traceable.

To

the

N.N.W. of

the villa at point 221

is

another of similar character,

with a reservoir with three chambers, the central one 27 metres wide, the
two side ones 2-45, without interconnection. Half a mile to the N.N.E. is
the village of Marcellina, which apparently does not occupy an ancient
Just before the village

site.

reached, near the Casino Trusiani,^ buildings

is

with pavements of mosaic and of marble were discovered (Sebastiani, op. cit.
fragments
p. 413, n.), and Nibby {op. cit. 294) in 1825 saw many architectural

and pieces of mosaic which had recently been found. Sebastiani {ibid?)
speaks, of another mosaic pavement found near the Casale Faccenda, and
of a paved road going thence towards

cenda lay on the N. of the


in

Monte Gennaro,

Marocco {Stato

village.

xiv.

{ibid?)

6562a (plain

top),

(Gorgon's head), were found


E. side of the village
38-5

The brickstamp

3615 was found.

C.I.L.

is

6573a

the Casale Fac-

Pontificio, x. 82), writing

(crab),

6593

(top

in these

broken), 6595

On

in 1898.

a very large subterranean water reservoir,

by 22 metres, divided

2388, and the

C.I.L. xv.

tomb near Marcellina

in

if

by Prince Borghese

1836, also speaks of recent excavations

lamps

as

the

measuring

into six aisles with round spiracula in the roof.

the N. of the cemetery, at a place called Colle Malatiscolo, are the

To

remains of a double platform

the retaining wall of the upper terrace

of rough opus quadratum, and upon

which

may
the

N.W. again

this are four

two water

is

reservoirs

the steep slope

very prominent terrace walls,

In a garden along the highroad,

Ionic capital.
'^

are several fragments of columns,

belong to a temple,^ or simply to

there are the remains of

To

it

Infra, 176, n.

3.

S.W.

is

villa

would point

known

the

that

fact

to the latter.

as Monteverde.

one above the other,

all

Upon
facing

of the cemetery, are fragments of coUimns and an

Classical Topography of the


which Gell

S.E., in

{pp. cit.

Roman Campagna. II.

175

311) and others have imagined that they saw

the remains of the walls of a primitive city, Gell preferring to identify the

with that of Medullia (see Nibby,

site
n.

The two

i).

The

op. cit.

ii.

and compare supra,

293,

lowest are close together, and obviously belong to a

172,

villa.

of very rough opus incertum, with rectangular niches joined by

first is

which there was once a portico (Fig. 27)

arches, in front of

the next of

polygonal work, of blocks of limestone carefully jointed but having the

masked

faces left rough,

at the

bottom by a low

The platform has been lengthened towards

strip of

opus incertum.

the S.E., and here the polygonal

blocks are smaller than in the original portion several about 30 by 20 cm.

The
slope,

third terrace wall lies three or four

and

is

at the S.E.

of opus incertum

at the

end a small water reservoir cut

terrace wall

hundred yards higher up the

N.W. end
in

is

a round tank in concrete,

the rock.

about the same distance away again

is

it

The uppermost
is

of Cyclopean

masonry, very finely jointed, with a strong horizontal tendency, 30 metres


in length,

and

3"5 in

height (Fig. 28).

Considerably further up the mountain,

in

the deep ravine

Scarpellata, and close to the steep path which ascends

La

it,

known

as

are three

retaining walls in the bed of the torrent, the lower of opus incertum, the

two upper of polygonal work, with very

Roman

jointing and obviously of

date.

Immediately

to the S. of these platforms the

Marcellina.

It

modern road from Ponte

from the station of Palombara and


appears, however, to follow more or less closely an ancient

Lucano comes up
line,

fine

to join the road

inasmuch as paving-stones are

the S. portion of

its

course.

visible in the fieldwall to the

It at first

passes the remains of a few

but soon reaches the district of the quarries

in

the

W.

of

villas,

travertine of later

formation, which must, one would think, have occupied the place of
sulphurous lakes, or of some obstruction which obliged the original Via
Here there are no remains of antiquity
Tiburtina to pass to the N. of it.
;

but a

little

before the railway line

is

reached, on the E. of the road, recent

agricultural operations have brought to light the remains of a large villa,

which must have been of considerable magnificence.


of fragments of sculpture are recorded in Not.
place

is

known

little

Battista,

as

Le

Previous discoveries

Scav. 1897,

is

The

Grottelle.
is

the Casale

upon foundations of opus reticulatum.

After the

further on, on the S. edge of the railway line,

which

148.

built

British School at Rome.

The

176

railway has been passed, the modern road runs through a long valley,
while the ancient road soon diverged from it, ascending the Colle della

Colonnella

a N.E. direction, with a branch going due N. along the E.

in

bank of the Fosso Vazoletto

On

N.W.

the

{infra, 180).

road,

of this

side

concrete core, about 25 feet high and


the

hill

may

villa in

little

perhaps take

the polygonal

mortar used

name

its

^
;

some

up,

is

the solid

and a

little

further on the remains of

blocks being very well jointed, and but

style, the

added

a vault to the N. has been

way

little

10 feet square, of a tomb, from which

later.

a little to the W. of the path, is a very large villa


of opus incertum, with nineteen intermediate
lower
with two platforms, the
buttresses, each r5 metre thick, at irregular intervals, and the upper of

Further up the

Cyclopean work
supplies a
villa to

modern

upon

this

is

a reservoir fed

An

fountain.

of the road

paved with blocks of

by a spring which

ancient road descends

the path in the valley, but

Remains
is

hill,-

its

width

is

only

W.S.W.

still

past this

2 metres.

along the ridge continue to be met with

local limestone)

(it

and there are remains of water

and other buildings near points 225, 222, and 227.


The road must have joined the ancient line of road to Palombara below
On its N. side, S.S.E. of point 235, are the
the platforms of Monteverde.

reservoirs

remains of another great

remaining

portion of an arched substructure

about 84 feet long and 12 wide, and close by

is

tank 26 metres
reservoirs.

villa

in

diameter, while

The prevalence

among

is

still

a circular open

the ruins are traces of two smaller

of such buildings

in

this district

is

no doubt

due to the fact that none of the great aqueducts passed through this
neighbourhood, so that each house had to arrange for its own supply.
Springs

Not

are,

however, not lacking.

far

to the

Castelluccio),

same

are the remains of a large mediaeval castle

(il

and the ruins known as Marcellina Vecchia belong to the

period.

Just before

Palombara, on the

property of Mr. P.

W.

J.

right,

is

the Casino Belli,

Chubb, who has discovered

in his

now

the

garden, about

Colonnella means 'a small column.'

For a sarcophagus found on this hill, see Not. Scav. 1894, 146.
Probably referred to under the name of Le Grotte by Marocco, Stato Potitificio, x. 64. He
1S36, in
also mentions excavations made hereabouts by a certain Signor Mendola, not long before
which were found the remains of a temple {supra, 1 74).
2

Roman Campagna. II.

Classical Topography of the


100 yards to the

metres

in width,

h'mestone pavement of a road 2'o6

S. of the house, the

running 10

S.

W.

of

177

very likely

It

is

merely a short road

joining the line which runs to S. Francesco (and thence, possibly

though

to Montecelio).
I have not marked it even conjecturally in the maps
There do not seem to be traces of antiquity upon this path at present,
though, when the first section of it (as far as S. Francesco) was improved, a
few years ago, some fragments of terracotta reliefs, which probably adorned
tombs, were discovered. One, now in the possession of Signor Bonfigli,

represents a youthful figure of Hercules, seated upon a


left

rock, with

his

Other fragments have been removed to

elbow leaning on a mask.

Roman

All belong to the

the Vigna Guberti, to the N. of Palombara.

period, being reproductions of late Greek models.

A
S.

mile or so

Giovanni

W.N.W.

Francesco

of S.

the interesting church of

is

The church

some paintings of the end of the 13th century.


to the

monument, with

Argentella, recently declared a national

in

itself

belongs

2th century, but there are traces of an earlier building, perhaps of

the 9th century.

full

description, from the pen

photographs of the church,


short mention in

the

will

Relazione del

conservazione del vwnitnienti di

Some

of the

be found

extent protected from damp, though more

most important of the paintings


rounded ends
'

strigil

'

pattern

in the centre
(i'/z/rrt,

166),

1899- 1902,

and a

in

the

per

211

la

sqq.

some
The
done.
be

and the church

remains to

still

reproduced

is

In the entrance porch

(tav. x.-xi.).

1902,

in

dall' Ufficio

esegiiiti

Provincia,

made

Enea Monti, with

late Sig.

Bull. Crist. 1898, 122,

lavori

Roma

necessary restorations were

in

first

to

article cited

a sarcophagus of white marble with

is

of the front

is

a space decorated with the

and on each side a

lion

attacking a boar:

there are also two other marble sarcophagi without reliefs at the fountain
outside.

One

of the columnr. of the Cosmatesque iconostasis at the end

of the right aisle (which bears the date

11

70) rests upon a piece of marble

bearing the letters

The

letters

of the

XL

7>

pC

GA
n>

KT

lower line must have been some

those of the upper rather

larger.

One

cm. high, and

of the four columns which sup-

port the baldacchino of the high altar has been cut from a fragment of a

The British School at Rome.

178

Roman

frieze of
Crist,

cit.

date,

In the last line but

two

nave

CVLTORIS SEMPER HONESTI


W. edge

to Montecelio, are the remains of a villa

of the path from Palombara

and a

little

further S., at a point

where the path passes along a ridge between two deep


looks not unlike an

embankment about 6

almost under the path

itself

may

XIT EGENS ANIMO

read

the E. of S. Giovanni, on the

on

its

feet

E. edge, two

high,

valleys,

upon what

there were found,

tombs of the Villanova

which seem to belong to a date intermediate between the

period,

{Bull.

{ibid. 134).

....

the last but one

To

T IVNIVS

126), and a fragment of a sepulchral inscription in elegiacs

in the floor of the

be seen

in

and bears traces of the name

of the Terremare and that of Latium

{Not. Scav.

civilisation

1902, 20; Bull. Coin.

1902, 97).

Tombs

of quite a late

Roman
way

date, with

found not

far off

S. again,

on the Colle Marocco, are other

little

which need not be mentioned


in the possession of

to publish them,

in detail.

is

are said to have been

a water reservoir,
ruins,

Two

and further

indicated on the map,

sepulchral inscriptions,

now

am

able

Signor Scipione Bonfigli^ by whose kindness

The first is upon the


marble 250 mm. high by 178 mm.

were found on

small cinerary urn of white


letters

to the S.E.

tiles,

being 15 to 17

mm.

high

this hill.

front of a

broad, the

DiS MANIBVS
LAETILIAE L F

GEMELLAE
VIX ANN XII
PATER ET

MATER
FECERVNT
The second
in

is

upon an upright slab with a base

thickness towards the top.

and the
period

letters,

It is

to stand upon, tapering

56 cm. high and 30 wide at the bottom,

which vary from 45 to 60

mm.

in

height, belong to a late

Roman Campagna. II.

Classical Topography of the

179

TVSIDIAE

FORTVNIAE

SI

FIL DVLCISSIME

Q V- AN XVI M
D XXIII TIOS
DEVS VXSICVS ET
CLODIA NATE PA
rENTES FILIA^^

III

Another sepulchral

inscription, that of

one Sophron

has also passed into Signor Bonfigli's possession

few years ago, and was

At
it

first

{C.I.L. xiv. 3846),

was

it

at Tivoli until a

copied there by Sieder in or before 1503.

a point where the path runs for a short distance N. and S. just after

has entered the territory of Montecelio, other late burials are said to

have been found, also a subterranean chamber, with paintings on

now full of
To the

an

is

open reservoir known as the

remains

lead

inscribed

pipes,

another

ruins of
no.

S.

which

below

walls,

its

water.

baths

of

said

are

which have since


the

villa still further to

to

'

Bagno

have

been

found

the

with

There are

destroyed.

S. (on

Dame,'

delle

been

N. edge of

map

on the Colle Selciata, the name of which seems to indicate that


path follows an ancient line, though there are now no traces of

ii.)

the

At

paving.

the bottom of the

Vazoletto {infra, 180).

hill

it

reaches the valley of the Fosso

The path going N.N.W. up

the Valle Marocco, and

joining the modern road to Palombara E. of the Ponte Levatore, very


follows an

likely

ancient

line,

though

there are

no certain

traces

of

antiquity.

We
in

must now return

to the railway station of Montecelio {supra, 117)

order to complete our survey of the

ancient roads which separated

district.

to the S. of

The southern

of the two

Torre Mastorta {supra, 106)

runs on, passing close to the station, and near the Casale dei Prati turns almost

Here

due E.

it is

joined by a cross-road from the N. branch, which

itself

Angelo ;- for though there are no definite


went on apparently due
traces of antiquity along the modern road (till recently a path), an
N. to S.

my

My

copy
2

reading

is

in

some

points uncertain, and

Signor Bonhgli has, however, kindly done

Whether the modern road up

to

have not had another opportunity of verifying


so.

MonteceUo follows an ancient

line, or no, I

cannot

say.

The

i8o

British School at Rome.

undoubtedly ancient road


in all

seen to the N. of the Riserva

is

probability starts from

Angelo on

this side

it:

must have

Nor

we

S.

Taking

In one place there

Not

fine.

from the

far

villa at

the

W.

is

point 115

a fragment of a draped female statue of white marble, about

To

it

side, with a cruciform chamber faced with opus reticulatum,

the voussoirs of which are very


is

paving along

course are indicated on the

its

map, but hardly require a detailed description.


its

the road going

first

find scanty traces of

the remains of several villas not far from

S.

any certain indicaAngelo and Poggio Cesi,

are there

between

line of traffic.

E. from near the Casale dei Prati,

tomb by

which

and some means of communication with


existed.

tions in the path traversing the valley

which also seems a necessary

la Pissina,

of the Casale Battista the road passes through a

cutting, the character of

stream through

it,

life size.

fairly

deep

which has been much altered by the passage of a

and reaches the road from Ponte Lucano, of which we

have just spoken {supra,

175).

We

must now follow the road leading due N. from this point, along the
Close
bank
of the Fosso Vazoletto, which is, in all probability, ancient.
E.
to the point where the road along the Colle della Colonnella diverges from
it,

there are the ruins of the small church of S. Vincenzo,^ with remains of

painting on the front of the triumphal arch

towards the

left

foot of a figure of

which

sheep, with head upturned

remains, and a decorative

little else

border of foliage below, not well executed, and covering some better work

but

is

a square of 3'20 metres.

On
some

The end

with egg and dart pattern.

in stucco,

To

the E. of

of the church

is

not apsidal,

are the remains of a

it

villa.

the other side of the stream, at the Casale Sinibaldi, are preserved

unimportant fragments of

and two

sculpture,

C.I.L. xiv. 3923, the other unpublished, so far as

inscriptions

know.

73 cm.

LAMITIA

L-

CMRY5AR10
43 cm.

The numeral
^

It is

is

cm.

6-5 cm.

X TESTAMENTO

6 "5 cm.

6-5 cm.

jv)

(D

undoubtedly 6000.

mentioned

in a

document of 1030 (Biuzza,

op. cit. no. xii. cf. p. 87).

one

Classical Topography of the

The
'

inscription

C.I.L.

above Casale Battista

3922

xiv.

Roman Campagna. II.

recorded as having been found

is

the territory of Montecelio,'

in

i8i

i.e.

here or here-

abouts.

Whether
is

the Casale Sinibaldi stands on an ancient site or not, there

no evidence to show

but a Httle

way

to the N. are the substructures of

Cyclopean work, with a somewhat strong tendency towards opus


It is probable that these are the walls spoken of by Fonteanive

villa in

quadratum.

{Avanci

58); cf

ciclopici,

There

Inst. 1873, 38.

is,

Gell, op.

135; // Buonarroti, 1873,4; Bull.

cit.

however, no doubt as to their real character, and

the idea that an ancient city could ever have stood on this

bottom of the slope of the

hill,

seems absurd,

for

it

the

site, at

absolutely unpro-

is

tected on the N.

kilometre N.N.W., below the village of Montecelio, are the remains

of a very large rectangular reservoir

each 23'89 metres


(below

are

it

in

some

in

opus incertum, with two chambers,

length and respectively 4*46 and 4'54 metres in width

traces of the villa which

it

supplied)

and

same

at the

distance further N. again are the remains of a similar structure, open to


the

air.

In the valley below, E.N.E. of Montecelio, are the remains of another


villa,

one of the largest

platform, which measures

is

Of

district.

the

some 70 by 60 metres,

preserved, cultivation being


struction

this

in

mainly of opus reticulatum along the

Bands of brick

through the whole at intervals, and the quoins are of

moisture from the platform.

all

in front as

Upon

stands.

it

The

plan on

p.

The
182

is

terrace

from

tufa.

The

the front being in

in

communication either with round pipes or triangular


high

is

con-

cubes of different

front,

drainage arrangements are noteworthy, the weepholes

remove

The

responsible for their destruction.

colours being used so as to produce a decorative effect.

run

upon the

buildings

practically nothing

drains,
is

so

as

to

at least 8 metres

my own measurements.

the platform itself are remains of a mediaeval church (S. Stefano),^

the apse of which

double piscina

is

is

shown with dotted

a mediaeval fountain.

Signor Boccanera

in the 'eighties,

lines,

and a

little

to the N. of the

Excavations were begun here by

but interrupted by his death.

The castle of Montecelio (the modern name is a corruption of Montia name as old as the nth century)- has foundations of Cyclopean

celli,

'

The chinch

lielonged to the abbey of Subiaco.


Annales Romaines (1044-1073) in Lib. Pont. (ed. Duchesne)

ii.

334.

.^\\\\^\H^

feM^iiiiiiiiiiiiiii

J H''/i/i

iiii^^

Roman Campagna. II.

Classical Topography of the

183

work of limestone on the W. and N. sides the blocks are rough, and,
though apparently hammered, have not been dressed in any way. The
faces measure from 107 m. by 0'55 to 06 by 05 m.
the blocks tail in from
I '1 8 to 07 m., and behind them are big stones and
earth (Fig. 29),
Here
;

we seem,

therefore, as indeed

we should

expect, to find the evidences of

the early occupation of so strong a position

another matter.

name

but the

of the site

or quite disappeared, are mentioned as existing in this district

Cameria,^ Corniculum, Medullia

with any

Nibby

certainty.

but

in

{Analisi,

no case can their


366)

ii.

Montecelio with Corniculum, which however


(i.

of the 17th century,

is

Pauly-Wissowa,

Chorographie, 253),

Simone

though

it

Cesi,

The only

and

S.

but, strictly

remarks,

1604)

iv.

The

inscrip-

Gell

{pp. cit.

54)

speaking, as Prof Hlilsen

Bormann

following
in

the three sharp-pointed

suit

{Alilatin.

the Tenuta of

of

hills

Montecelio,

Angelo.

other trace of antiquity in Montecelio, with the exception of


is

small temple, the cella of which

to be seen within the castle.


is

well preserved.

metre thick, and

was probably

it

tetrastyle

their diameter

their distance apart

on a

rests

is

Here

is

of brick, rect-

the pilasters

is

It

by about 8 long the walls are 0"85


stylobate v6 metre high.
The colonnade

angular, measuring 4'i metres wide

identify

according to Dionysius

{supya, 56).

should be sought somewhere

isolated architectural fragments,

capitals

be fixed

to

Marco
must be confessed that the name Montes Corniculani

it

seems eminently to
Poggio

inclined

is

a blatant forgery {C.I.L. xiy. 403*).

places Corniculum at S. Angelo

Ameriola,

sites

have been found here at the end

tion in praise of Servius Tullius, said to

(in

lay,

somewhere between Ficulea and Tibur

16),

is

Several early towns, which in imperial times had almost

in

place

0*45 metre, their height

from centre to centre

2"45.

have Corinthian

still

up

to the collarino 3'3,

The brickwork

is

very

good, the bricks averaging 0*035 m. thick on the outside and 0-039 on the
inside,

castle
45,

and the mortar layers 0'0i3 and 0'Oi5 respectively.


built it was converted into a chapel (Lanciani, Btdl.

was

When

the

Inst. 1870,

from which these measurements are taken).-

Somewhere within

the

territory

of

the

village

fine

sculptured

For Cameria, which is generally supposed to have been at or near Palombara, cf. supra, 76.
Remains of a pagan cemetery, as well as those of the older church, are said to have been
found at S. Michele, on the hill to the S. of the village, in 1724, when the foundations of a new
monastery were laid (Casimiro, Memorie delle chiese e dei conventi dei Frati Minori della Provincia
Komana, 187).
^

The

i84
sepulchral

cippus

were

many

also,

C.I.L. XV.

To

was discovered

1898,

284),

as

years before, C.l.L. xiv. 3919, 3921,^ and the lead pipe

7900 {Faustus fee).

known

hill,

which supplied

at each end,

it,

Above

as the Grotte della Pissina.

it is

the reser-

a large open structure, with a semicircular portion

having a radius of 7-85 m,, while the rectangular part

by 1570 m.

centre measures 17-60

some

1898 {Not. Scav.

in

the S.W. of Montecelio are the remains of another huge villa on the

slope of the
voir

British School at Rome.

8 or 9 feet.

Further to the

rough sketch plan of

W.

are the remains of the

the total extent of the lower terrace

and 140 from N.

to S.

is

it

In the

W.

in

given.

an immense building

villa,

roughly 240 paces from E. to

is

the

preserved to a height of

Its walls are

portion of the S. side

it is

W.

supported by

a wall of opus reticulatum, with buttresses projecting 1-45 metre and 0*9 in

width at intervals of about 3-4 metres


terrace begins

this

measures roughly

buildings of the villa

brickwork.
^

Whether

Of

itself,

1853-

no

the latter inscription,


is

paces square, and comprises the

which were constructed of concrete faced with

the superstructure but

been brought from Castrimoenium

25 paces from this wall the upper

little is

which speaks of ordo


uncertain

it

is

dec.

preserved, though the plan


.

Moentensiuju,

may

not have

a fragment found in a wall of a church in

Roman Campagna. II.

Classical Topography of the


might be recovered by excavation.
paving /;/ situ, belonging no doubt

and a
deep,

further E.

little

hewn out of

is

At
to a

i.s

little

There are, however, conand subterranean chambers on the

a single block of travertine.

and E. sides of the upper

On

there

branch from the road on the N.,

a fountain basin, r85 metre in diameter and 0*45

siderable remains of cryptoporticus


S.

N.W. angle

the

185

terrace.

the N. side of the villa there

several limestone paving-stones and

Roman

very probably the

is

is

W. which

a path going

no doubt ancient.

route to Montecelio, though

with any certainty beyond the

commencement

It

contains

was indeed

cannot be traced

it

of the steep descent to the

valley E. of Colle Grosso.


this point and the station of Montecelio are the remains of
which are indicated on the map, but need not be mentioned in
and there are others of a similar character on the Colle Grosso.
detail
I do not know what the building can be to which Ciampini ( Vetera

Between

other

villas,
;

Monivienta,

refers

68)

i.

'
:

dum

haec

reticulata opera rimabar,

animad-

verti non omnia ex topho elaborata esse, ut hie Romae, neque ex silice,
ut Tusculi, sed etiam quandoque ex marmore Tiburtino, et ex lapide

Albano, sicut

Antiquissimum
Corniculani
indicavit

On
mara

aedificium

Servii Tullii

D.

ipsum, una

opportunitas, et vicinarum fodinarum natura

loci

Franciscus

cum

solitis

reticulati
.

faces

S.,

vidi

dum

Maria Lancianus

Corniculi,

praeterito

quod ipsi
Haec mihi
anno

apud

amicis hospes essem.'

the hillside to the S. of S.


it

operis

Palatium fuisse existimant

ferebat.

Angelo

is

a large villa

and has a cryptoporticus y6

m.

in

known

as Valle-

width on the

E., S.,

and W., lighted by windows at the sides. It stands upon a lofty platform,
supported by walls of opus reticulatum with large rectangular stone
Above
quoins, the front of which is some 48 metres in length (Fig. 30).
it to the N. is the reservoir by which it was supplied with water, 29-95 ^
long, divided into three chambers,

each

3-4

metre

in width.

Half a mile further W., just on the E. of the path ascending to


Angelo, are some mediaeval ruins, built upon a large underground
chamber, divided into three arcades, which may have been a Roman water
S.

reservoir.

the highest point of the Colle Lungo, about a mile to the

Upon

S.S.W., the remains of a


1

Probably 1688,

as,

given on Jan. 12, 1689.

villa,

probably belonging to the time of the

although the title-page bears the date 1690. the

'

Approbatio operis' was

The

86

British School at Rome.

Claudian emperors, a statue and two heads of marble and some fragments

were discovered

which

found

also

property

and

Two

hill,

1895

{Not.

may have

N.W.

1895, 324, 421).

one

of the

upon a

of later date.

and more

higher

slightly

Angelo Romano or

of S.

cippus was

boundaries of the

many tombs

were found

of Montecelio,

the village

lies

Scav.

indicated

in the villa itself

miles

isolated

in

Angelo

S.

in

by two ancient roads from Rome one the


road described supra, 108, leaving the Via Tiburtina at the eighth mile, the
other that known as the Strada Vecchia di Palombara {supra, ^A^sqq}). The
This

Capoccia.2

is

accessible

existence of these two roads proves that


in

ancient times, and possibly

Gell thought

Nibby

{loc. cit.).

it

is

it

was a place of some importance

to be identified with

{Analisi,

ii.

Corniculum. as

325) prefers to call

it

Medullia,

we know only that it was an ancient Latin town in the neighbourhood of Nomentum, and close to the Sabine territory, occupying a strong

of which

position
vi.

34).

('

munitionibus',

tuta

Pliny {H.N.

(here the form

Liv.

i.

33,

cf

38; Dion. Hal.

ii.

36,

iii.

i,

it among the lost cities of Latium


Bormann {op. cit. 262) prefers Coppi's

68) enumerates

iii.

Medullum

view {Diss. Accad. Pont.

is

v.

found).
204),

according to which

it

should be placed

between the Anio and the Fosso Magliano (Magugliano, supra, 102) or
Fosso di Marco Simone i.e. somewhere in the neighbourhood of Marco

Simone itself But it is there that he places the KopviKXa opi-j {supra,
and it would seem that his views are inconsistent with one another.
his

map he

56),

In

puts Medullia (doubtfully) at Montecelio,

Both Nibby and Gell speak of the existence of considerable remains


of walls in rough Cyclopean work (the latter even gives a sketch of them)
outside the village, close to the church of S. Liberata, at the S. extremity

of the

hill

these they consider to be part of the walls of a city to which

the site of the present village served as acropolis.

visited

the village in

1898, and could then neither see nor hear anything of these walls, which

may have

disappeared

in the village.

The

in

the interval, nor of any traces of ancient work

inscription

C.I.L. xiv.

S.

knew anything

lay at the foot of the

village.

As

Two

Angelo.

3926/7

The only remains

been copied at

hill,

is

recorded as having

of which the inhabitants

half a mile to the N. of the

hundred yards E. of the present road from

Rome

(the

have not marked it upon the map.


Pogg'o Cesi, the summit between Montecelio and S. Angelo, which is higher than either,
occupied by a mediaeval castle and there are no traces of any constructions of an earlier period
a remarkable fact.
^

the exact position

is

not given,

"^

is


Roman Camtagna. II.

Classical ToroGRAPHv of the


'

Strada Vecchia di Palombara

some insignificant remains of the


known as Le Pezze, and to the

are

')

187

terrace wall of a villa in Cyclopean work,

N.E. are remains of the

villa itself^

little

further E. are three circular

probably quarries, one of which has been converted

cavities,

open water reservoir with concreted

times into an

sides,

80

Roman

in

feet in

diameter

and 6 deep.
Further E. again are the remains of a very large

entirely in

It is
is

Cyclopean work

villa

there

of 73 metres and a height of

facing E., preserved for a length

and the

a wall

3 metres.

quadratum

the tendency towards opus

strong, the faces of the stones are very smooth,

is

joints very close,

the angle of one block being sometimes dovetailed into the upper surface

of the block below (see Fig. 31).

The

has perished
in

20 metres

in front

of

it

Cyclopean work, and 14 metres

concrete.

The

place

and Nibby

{pp. cit.

we

site

\.

no doubt

38

i.

is

where Cell

{op. cit.

52)

Prisci
dis-

Of

its

exact

and nothing more, there

is,

how-

H.N.

Pliny,

villa,

they are situated

this

also be perceived.

iii.

68).

nothing.

That the remains are those of a


ever,

terrace can

and one of those which had

Priscus,

time (see Livy

know

itself

of that remains of a wall in

in front

137) locate Ameriola, one of the cities of the

by Tarquinius

in Pliny's

really

be traced, but the wall

are remains of a lower terrace wall

The line of the W. side of the


is known as La Civitella, and

Latini subdued

appeared

may

N. side of this terrace

line of the

in

comparatively low ground,

in

position strategically useless.

We

have now concluded our survey of the territory of Tibur to the

and turn

N.,

study the

to

has been said, on the

by the narrow Anio


which runs up the

VI.

W.

the

district to

side of the wall of

valley.

The

Tibur

city of

river valley, will

S.

of the city, keeping,

mountains which
itself,

is

as

broken only

and the Via Valeria

be considered on another occasion.

The Territory of Tibur on the South


{from Tivoli

to

Gericomio).

The road which issues from the S. extremity of the town of Tivoli,
and forms the commencement of the modern highroad, is, as we have
^

them.

They have

inadvertently been omitted from both

maps

the circular reservoir

is

to the E. of

The

88

seen {supra, 142), of

British School at Rome.

Roman

below, the second descending

more or

third keeping

The

first

less

falls

more gradually

on the

of these branches

road soon divides into three

Tliis ancient

origin.

branches, one descending the steep slope that

a southerly direction, the

Ponte Lucano to

into the road from

Corcolle about a mile S. of the iovraQV {supra, 128, 142).

pavement upon

Latiuni, x. 654) recalls the discovery of

of

the plain

along the mountain-side.

level

falls

in

away towards

Volpi {Vetics

upper section

this

near a small chapel dedicated to S. Marco.

it

Upon each

side of

is

however,

Hiibner

in

the right

a large villa platform with retaining

Cyclopean masonry, described


(cf,

On

are the remains of large villas.

it

below the Riformatorio

Civ. Catt.

in

Bull.

Inst.

ser.

1857,

1857,

iii.

walls of

vi.

p. 357
Fonteanive,

by

and

74;,

vol.

A little further down,


74, as though it were a Pelasgic hieron
upon a projecting shoulder of the hill, and commanding a splendid view,

op. cit.

is

another, the traditional villa of Plancus, built of opus reticulatum and

opus incertum,^ with two cryptoporticus.

On
is

the

left

a large villa

the

loth

of the path, just where

known

century,

it

crosses the

for

in

bull

of Marinus

modern highroad,

The name goes back

as the Villa dei Pisoni.^

of 945

II,

A.D.,

in

p.

19,

subsequent documents (see Bruzza, Regesto della Chiesa di Tivoli,


1.

II,

oliveyards and vineyards described as

etc.),

'in pesoni

'

to

and

men-

are

tioned as belonging to the see of Tivoli.

Azzara found there in 1779 a


unique statue of Britannicus, sixteen heads of Greek philosophers and
poets

of which

(all

he

left

to

the royal

library

celebrated bust of Alexander the Great which

436) (Visconti, Museo Pio Clementino,\.


1784,

Gennaio,

p.

p. 13

at

now

Madrid), and

the

Louvre

(no.

in the

Guattani, Moniinienti Inediti,

Domenico de Angelis

2).

is

1780 found chambers

in

decorated with painted stucco, the drawings of which existed in Bulgarini's

time

in the

Palazzo Municipale (Bulgarini,

^/. r//.

115, n. 93).

Francesco

Carlandi discovered more recently some marble pavements and fragments


of statues
S.

Maria

xiv.

in

(Bulgarini,
Pisoni,

3826 was often

Not

ibid?).

which

has

copied

in

far

now

from

this villa, at the

disappeared,

chapel of

the inscription

the 15th and i6th centuries.

In

C.I.L.

1488

^
In one place courses of baked bricks '04 metre thick, and tufa blocks O'o; thick by about
0'20 long, are arranged alternately in threes.

in

Two

Veteris

very poor views of

Lata

it

are given by Volpi, Vettis Latin w, x.

Antiqtiitatiini Amplissinia Co/kch'o

(Rome,

1776), pt.

I,
i.

opp. p. 360 (reproduced


pis.

13, 14).


Roman Campagna. II.

Classical Topography of the


Fra Giocondo copied near

this

Madonna

delle piaggie or delle quattro

of hermae of various

shafts

chapel (which was also

and del Re

della Strada, while Cabral

Carneades,

Aristotle,

{op.

Heracleitus,

Maria
as the

it

inscriptions on the

Andocides,
Miltiades

Isocrates,

as S.

134) speak of

cit.

faccie) seven

Greek worthies

known

189

Aristogeiton,

(Kaibel,

I.G.I.

Rom. Mitt. 1901,


Sieder saw them in the same
125, 155 sgq., nos. 3, 4, 6, 13, 19, 20, 30).
place in 1503: he notes that two of them were 'in S. Marco,' but
this chapel was not far off.
Pighius saw them there in the middle of
1

134,

the

136,

138,

159,

168,

170,

6th century (and besides the

more

1128, 1131a,

I.G.I.

collection),

and drew

result that they


I.G.I.

and

22

the

186;

seven already noted, apparently four

1163a;

140,

Hiilsen,^

attention

nos.

were removed to the Papal

may

18)

(Hiilsen, no. 43)

certainly does.

also

his

own

to the series,

Hlllsen's

with

the

Papa Giulio).
same locality,

the

cf Hiilsen,

/oc.

127 sqq.

cit.

which are no doubt forgeries of

131, 208).

{ibid.

found

16

them,

For the subsequent history

Close by, near a ruined house just N. of this

was

of

7,

to

come from

of these hermae (several of which are lost)

number

2,

III

villa (Villa di

167 (Hiilsen, no.

Ligorio added a

i,

of Julius

columbarium, with

C.I.L. xiv. 3725,

The second

villa,

called

the tablets bearing

La

the

Rosolina,

inscriptions

3781.

of the

three

roads descends

in

southerly

direction,

modern highroad about half a mile from Tivoli between it


and the lower bend of the modern highroad are the remains of two
leaving the

villas,

one of which

is

partly in

Cyclopean work,

finely jointed, with a

tendency towards horizontal bedding, and the external faces smoothed (a


low wall just below it, of similar but rougher construction, is probably a
portion of the substructure of a road), while the other, a very

loft}'

platform

with walls of opus incertum, stands at the 26th kilometre from

Rome

(Fig- 32).

Our road
^

crosses the highroad close to the turn of the zig-zag

Prof. Hiilsen locates the villa, in

and del Re's plan indicates

it

my

down the hill for where Cabral


and one would think that they have

opinion, rather too far

there are no remains of a villa,

(known

inaccurately represented the locality of the large villa at the 26th kilometre (which they place to the

N. of the path), for they speak of it (op. cit. 137) as if it were a building of considerable size.
It is,
however, somewhat difficult to find the road which they call the Strada delle Piaggie (op. cit. 132)
un the map in fact, it is apparently the first of the three roads described by me which corresponds
with their Strada di S. Marco^ which descends directly to Casale Leonina.
:


The British School at Rome.

iQo
as

'

Regresso

and divides into two branches

')}

one of these goes to the

Villa Bulgarini, at the S.E. extremity of the. Villa of Hadrian, the other

Neither

to the Colle S. Stefano.

probably so

is

their straightness of

especially the latter

remains

appears to have been,

residences.

remarkable, and

is

of villas are frequent.

along both

This side of Tibur

more thickly studded with


in ancient
the map will show

anything,

if

than the N. side, as a glance at


in fact, there

demonstrably ancient, but both are

line

villas

times,

must have been an uninterrupted succession of aristocratic


is not necessary to describe each one in detail, as they

It

present, as a rule, the

same

characteristics,

and we may confine ourselves

to repeating that the traditional nomenclature

is

almost always utterly

worthless.

The third and uppermost road, the Strada


way above the modern highroad, on the level.
was found

(the Seminario)

Above

si

trouano

Near the

Re

the road, behind the Villa Braschi, Antonio del

le

in

piano

reliquie di

'
:

doue

Villa sopra

la

Villa Braschi

C./.L. xiv. 3855, in 1739.

places the Villa of the Rubellii

che mettono

some

Carciano, keeps

di

si

veggono muri

dorso,

il

& dopo

essa Villa di muri rouinati fra

cit.

(o/>.

antichi,

&

103)
volte

discende, secondo

vigne fino alia

le

Quaregna nominata \i.e. the road following the S. bank


strada
of the Anio eastwards], e fra le Vigne & Oliueti, che all' opposita parte
del monte descende fino alia strada, che conduce verso la contrada,
della

detta

le

Piagge

di

&

Cassano,

si

trouano

detto spatio con acque nelli luoghi


Latiuni,

the traces of

it

Re

160) there was very

{op. cit.

dei Greci

name

In

villa.

little to

have almost entirely disappeared.

simply due to the existence of the local

Below the Villa

Kircher

bassi della Villa.'

162) also speaks of the remains of this

Cabral and del

villa in

sparsamente dette rouine

Ripoli,

Vetiis

the time of

be seen, and

The
and

now

identification
is

in

is

not a safe one.

(now the Collegio Irlandese) there

is

a huge

three terraces, with retaining walls of opus reticulatum, which are

noticeable as having cubes of both tufa and travertine, the two colours

being arranged

in

patterns so as to produce a decorative effect (Fig. 33).

Immediately on the W. of
reservoir, a plan of

'

which

.Stevenson {Vat. Lat. 10552,

this

f.

villa

given

is

i)

is

b}'

a small, but very perfect, water

Lanciani, Covinientari di Frontino"-

mentions the existence of paving-stones

metre of the modern road, which probably belong to our road.


- I cite the paging of the reprint from Atli dei Liiuei, ser.

iii.

vol. iv. (1880).

at

the 26th kilo-

Roman Campagna. II.

Classical Topography of the


tav.

i.

be

name

in

the documents cited on

is

modern highroad

at

three platforms, supported

masonry, the

Regresso,

by

124, gives a

still

perpetuate the

ser.

cit.

was

in this villa,^

though

as
vol.

ii.

viii.

dell'

(1854), 349.

alle

Portions of the

while Dodwell,

op. cit.

According to Bulgarini

wall.

Appendice

with

villa

and Cyclopean

belonged to a Pelasgic

it

Figs. 34, 35

in

to the turn

another enormous

is

view of the Cyclopean

109, Continuazione

{op.

1774-80

to

walls of opus reticulatum

two lower terrace walls are shown

of Cassius,'

and

rightly remarks that the

6T))

below the road, and close

S.,

being treated

latter

hieron in Civilta Cattolica,

He

as the Villa of

too vague to identify the villa with certainty.

Five hundred yards further


of the

pi.

p. 129, n. i,

of Cassius, though Viola {Risposta,

indication

known

frequently

villa is

Carciano, which belongs to this district, being taken to

from a fundus Cassanus or Cassianus (both forms occur),

derived

mentioned

name

This

Fig. 8 (see p. 46).

Cassius, the

191

Notizie su

Tivoli, 32),

it

by Cabral and Del Re the Villa


that the excavations of Domenico de Angelis were made in
and not

in that called

'

(cf Lanciani, Rendicojiti dei Lined, 1897,

Bull.

Com. 1898,

33).

discovered the group of statues of Apollo and the Muses (Helbig,

Fiikrer,

i.

nos. 2:74-281), a Minerva, a

Faun and

a nymph,^ a child

typi-

fying sleep, a recumbent Bacchus, a Faun, a Hygieia or Salus, with a


serpent, a draped female torso,

Mus. Pio-Clem.,

Rom.

ed.

and many hermae

1782, in foL,

i.

p.

(see

below).

(Visconti,

Visconti speaks of a

13.)

mosaic representing a Nile scene, which, according to Viola {Tivoli nel


Deeennio, 289), was bough't

Egyptian statues
rosone,

in

he also states that the

Pius

VI, and that various

1846

of

black marble, a fine crocodile in pietra di paragone, a

with a lizard and a frog playing in the leaves, some more

hermae, and an

altar,

AgatJio

123),

were found.

was found, not with

no. 3533, as

Kaibel,

in

were continued by order

excavations

fine

by a Russian

/.(S"./.

Daeinoni
It
is

maybe

Sacrinn

{C.I.L.

xiv.

noted that C.I.L.

3533

ibid.

3614

there stated owing to a misprint, but

with no. 3553.

The hermae found

in

the villa are given

in

Kaibel, /.C./. 1129, 1130,

Both Nibby [Analisi,

[op. cit.

i. 389) and Sebastian!


{op. cit. 230) are at fault.
Cabral and del Re
165) call this villa the Villa of Brutus ; but the contract for the excavations of De Angelis

the Villa of Cassius, and so do Nibby and Sebastiani.


This group, according to Sebastiani {loc. cit.), was bought by Lord Jennings: Bulgarini
calls him Penchins
but we really have to do with Thomas Jenkins, English consul and antiquity
dealer, who bought it for 600 scudi, and resold it to a Milord Inglese for 4,000.
calls

it

"-

'

'

The

192
1135,

1190-1192, 1194, 1195, 1208, 1220. The


1196, was found rather lower down the hill, and with it
1163,

1145,

1144,

British School at Rome.

Plato herma, ibid.

ahead, not belonging

1174,

to

non ordinario lavoro

'di

it,

(Viola, Tivoli net

'

Kaibel wrongly quotes Viola as saying that the head was


Decemiio, cit).
Most of these hermae are now in the Vatican, but
slightly damaged.

one of those of Pericles (1191)


stated where the Plato

On

the British

Museum

while

not

is

it

is.

other hand,

the

in

is

was

it

in

the

villa

further

N. (which

to the

the older writers on Tivoli call Villa of Cassius), beneath the Villa dei
Greci, that excavations were made by Cardinal Ferdinando dei Medici

and Francesco Bandino

occasion statues, columns,


op.

cit.

owner

Archbishop of Siena, on which

dei Piccolomini,

(Antonio del Re,

were found

cornices, etc.,

text of the agreement between the Cardinal and the


(dated Dec. 19, 1568) for the possession of this site, with liberty to

The

106).

excavate and take what he found, including the purchase of two columns
In 1777, columns,
of coloured marble, is given \n Bull. Com. 1898,32.
were found here
marbles
coloured
of
pavements
and
statues,
fragments of
(Cabral and del Re,

Zappi {Annali

op. cit. 163).

Memorie di

Tivoli,

una spiaggia

di

Monte Calvo

discosto

un Aquidotto da sei palmi alto,


la stradd Publica oue si ritrouaua

69-71), writing in or about 1580,

ff.

gives the following description of this villa

: La Villa
'

mezzo

ritroua in

si

miglio dalla Citta di Tiuoli (;)

et largo quattro,
in quel

di Cassio

il

Mezzo

quale passa per

tempo una

Siricata [a corruption

of Selciata] in pietre di Monte, et Tirana uerso la Citta di Tiuoli


quale Aquedotto con {sic) conduceua I'Accque Aniene principalmente
.

il

una

in

Fontana Rustica di Tartari Tiburtini, che anche hoggi si Ritrouano li


uestigii uicino ad un Teatro con una Loggia di sopra con pauimento di
Musaico secondo che

si

et bellezza, fra quali ui

uedono

Molte Colonne diuerse,

di

ne sono

Terra, con Busti e teste di statue,

Brecce verdi Bellissime

Magnanimo
Bona Rota.

et

(:)

molte scoperte cauate

di
le

Colonne sono

oue questo luogo

Reggio, secondo

Questo luogo

si

il

lo

di

Natura

Novo sopra

Mischio Africano et di

egli fu destinato per

un Cenacolo

Ritroua sottoposto a Ponente

ducento passi

qual Cenacolo godeua quattro

Amene

in

con una

piano et larga

Belle Viste

uerso leuante accosto alia strada Publica la quale seruiua a molti

luoghi Regali,

la

qual uilla

la

si

la

Parere dello ScuF*^ M'\ Michel Angelo

Piazza, Auanti a d Cenacolo longo piu di

cento

di

di diuersa

Ritroua diuisa

in

tre

Appartamenti

altri
il

Roman Campagna. II.

Classical Topography of the

come

dico

li

il

Appartamento,

Cenacolo con

la

Prima Fontana con

Teatro,

il

possedeua Anche un Piano,

secondo

il

Ritroua Basso piu di Uinti Palmi uerso Ponente, con una

si

Abbitatione con diuersi ricettacoH, et Conserue di Accque per


.

193

Estate

la

quale seruiua per un Passeggiatoro con

il

il

suo Pauimento bellissimo di Musaico grosso e godeua I'Aere di Ponente, et

anche sogetto
un

all'

Aere da parte

Regio Appartamento

altro Bellissimo e

Nicchia piu di trenta Palmi con

scatturiua in

Mezzo

della Nicchia

si

Tramezzi

sguascio accio

perche

la

di

muro

si

godesse

fatti

si

ritrouauano tre diuerse loggie con

con Grande Artificio uerso Tramontana per

Fresco

il

fatta di Tartari Tiburtini alta

il
suo Vano proportionato, I'Accqua
come hoggi si uedono li Uestigii detti

di sopra alia d^ fontana, sopra la quale


certi

et oltra di questo seguita poi

quale possiede una degna habi-

il

una fontana Rustica

tatione similmente con


la

Tramontana,

di

delli uenti

secondo che

sua uaga uista possedesse I'Aere di Ponente, et

egli

la d*

spirauano

habitatione

possiede dicidotto Appartamenti tutti d'un Ordine, e tra I'uno appartamento

e
et

I'altro ui

auanti

sono Ordini di Colonne Stuccate Toscani alte di quindici palmi,


si

ritrouaua un altra uaga Piazza, longa sessanta passi, et larga

quaranta e possiede ponente e


descriuere

confondono

perche
et

Totamente

alcuni altri

Affricani in

di

Regal Uilla Adriana.

la

I'intelletto

dell'

gli

In one or other of these


'

Villa of Cassius

tions were

made

Upon
villas,

pauimenti

li

Marmi

altri

grande Magnificenza,

villas,

and probably

posso

gli

di

di essa,

Musaico,

Belli

simili

Inst.

et grandezza.'

in the latter

without further localisation

iS^o (Bu/l

in

for the discovery of

'

non

Grandezze

riguardanti et ingegnosi spiriti Restano con

loro satisfatione considerato tanta

term

huomo

Mischi porfidi, serpentini, et

modo che

tutte le qualita Magnificenze,

(?)

(though the

ambiguous), excava-

is

831, 29), but without result except

rough mosaics.

the left-hand side of the Strada di Carciano, between the two

little

way beyond

the divergence of the

which runs even higher along the mountain-side,

new road
is

to S. Gregorio,

a small cave

hewn

in

the rock, in which are four rough sarcophagi close together (Cabral and
del Re,
^

o/>. cit.

164).^

In Stevenson's

MS.

little

way

further on, the road

notes in the Vatican library

plan of the tomb, a single rectangular chamber, about

Vat. Lat. 10552,

370 by 270

is

carried
23) there

upon an
is

a sketch

metres, cut in the rock:

immediately behind it passes the specus of an aqueduct (probably the Anio Vetus) which curves
around it in such a way as to indicate that the tomb is earlier in date than it.
He also gives a
sketch of the stone door slab of the tomb.
There follows a copy by him of a document entitled
' Notitia delle
reliquie ritrovate in una grotta del Territorio di Tivoli luogo d Carciano,' from

The

194

British School at Rome.

embankment, supported on the lower side by a wall of rough Cyclopean


work (Fig. 36).
The specus of the three great aqueducts the Anio Vetus, the
Marcia, and the Anio Novus now begin to be visible, running one
The specus of the Anio Novus, the
above the other above the road.

known

highest of the three, traverses a large piscina,

as Grotte Sconce,

divided into three chambers, which probably served as a clearing tank.

The

plan

is

little

roughly shown below.

further on, below the road,

beyond

Just

this,

the road

is

is

the villa described supra, 191.

again supported on the

W.

side

by a long

wall of Cyclopean work, preserved to a height of two or three courses only,


parallel to

and just below which runs the specus of the Anio Vetus, which

has by this time passed under the road, while the other two aqueducts
are

still

two

on the upper side of

terraces,

which

it

it.

Beyond

this

again

is

a large villa with

both supported by walls of opus incertum and Cyclopean

appears that the tomb was opened on April 28, 1693, i" the presence of Canonico Antonio
by the Reverenda Camera Apostolica. A large slab of travertine was found,

Filippi, delegated

which served as the door of the tomb, with what was thought to be a cross upon

it

but Stevenson's

sketch of the slab (which he saw on the spot in 1879) shows that it was an imitation of four panels
with a round hole to represent the keyhole.
Five large nails, each one palm (m. o'223) long, were

found in front of

it.

Behind

this

slab

was the tomb

itself,

a chamber containing four large

sarcophagi, three of them each of a single block of peperino (two of them with heavy lids of the

and one of travertine with a cover of the same stone. On the stucco coating of the
which had lost its cover, were letters which could not be
deciphered, except in the case of the travertine sarcophagus, where MAIOREO M could be clearly

same

material),

front of each of them, except of that

made

oui.

'

Classical Topography of the

Roman Campagna. II.

work, the lower wall being especially fine

195

has Cyclopean work with a

it

strong horizontal tendency for a length of 28-5 metres and a height of


metres, while on the S. side are three arcades of opus incertum, the rest

57

Dodwell gives views of

being of the two styles alternately.

Upon

126).^

the lower platform

is

Hereabouts 'a destra nel luogo detto

small, water reservoir.

it

{pp. cit. 125,

a very finely preserved, though quite


Arcinelli

gli

was found the

inscription C.I.L. xiv. 3737.


mile further on, the road cuts through the remains of a

A
place

called

where

Papale,

Grotta

Re

and del

Cabral

villa,

{pp.

at a

168)

cit.

place the Villa of Aelius Rubrius, on the authority of the inscription C.I.L.
Herciili Dojuestico

T.

Aeli Rttbri Superstitis!

This inscrip-

xiv.

3542,

tion

was carved upon the base of a statue of Hercules, larger than life-size,
feet and portions of the

'

which had perished, though the shape of the


club and the lion-skin were preserved.

The base was

existing in the house

of Lorenzo Bernini at the time of Cabral and del Re.


correctly given

probable that we have,

is

it

name

arrived at the correct

of the owner of the

If the find-spot

is

almost solitary case,

this

in

villa.

Three-quarters of a mile further on, the road cuts through a round


water-tank, near which are the remains of a

Re

Cabral and Del

{op. cit. 169),

Here, according to

villa.

hypocausts, columns, mosaic pavements,

1779 recently been found. 'Near here was found, in 1790, the
p. 69,
statue of a Triton, now in the Vatican (Visconti, Mus. Pio-Clem.

had

etc.,

in

i.

tav. 35).

Three or four^hundred yards

to the S. of the road, the

Fosso

di

Ponte

Terra was crossed by a bridge, of which two piers only remain, of concrete

They

faced with small rectangular blocks of tufa.

28

thick,

and

39

broad:

they are preserved

6 metres, and no traces of the spring of an arch

height of

about

are visible (Fig. 37).

the banks of the ravine no signs of either a specus or a road can be

On

seen

wide

but as there

for

no aqueduct deposit about, and the bridge

is

an aqueduct,

it

probably

served

does at a sharp bend,

it

Not much
1

'

'

is

mentioned

in the Bull of A.D.

Coming

too
the
as

it

Petronselli speaks of

i8th, 1740.

further along the road, Sebastiani

fundus fusci'

by some writers the

November

W.

is

connecting

S. Vittorino.

runs almost due E. and

as an aqueduct in his letter of

road

for

Strada di Carciano with the neighbourhood of

it

are 3-6 metres apart,

to

{op. cit.

945 {supra, 148,

n.),

239) notes two


and

this villa is called

Villa of Fuscus,' but without sufficient reason.

The

196

British School at Rome.

small niches which were used for columbaria, called

rock on the

left

of the road, one round, the other square, with ollae of

remained.

The

building

strange.

fine

Tesoro, cut in the

Traces of painted plaster spread over the natural rock

terracotta.

II

is

mosaic

fact that these

Half a mile further on


with a geometrical

floor

is

the Casale of Gericomio

design

and

black

in

discovered, and in one of the outbuildings

has recently been

opus reticulatum, so that an ancient

villa

Memorie di

September

Silvia,

S.

7th, 1739, says

stanze ad uso di stalle vicino


vien detto

ci

and

154),

al forno, in

Petronselli, in
ci

sono

some

Half of a

no doubt stood here.

nella vigna di Giricomio

'

white

is

marble head of Hadrian was found here by the Duca Conte


(Cassio,

still

columbaria were not enclosed within any-

Poll

di

of

letter

tre piccole

parte di opera reticolata ove mi

siano nel pavimento alcune figure d'idoli greci in musaico.'

Here the Strada


have not been

Carciano ends

di

able to trace.

It

its

further course

may have

ever had one)

(if it

turned southwards as a modern

path does, following the aqueducts (a road along the

which must

line of

have been almost a necessity),^ and have thus, after about a mile, reached
the Colle Faustiniano in the neighbourhood of the

Ponte

Antonio

S.

{supra, 133).

Petronselli in the

same

letter

speaks of a building with four aisles (a

water reservoir or the substruction of a


di S.

Le

After visiting

Cappelle.^

it,

sito oggi detto delle


il

Affliano

il

massime che

grande oggi detto

di S.

restan le sud Cappelle.

sara

per

reticolate

risolvere.
3

I'iscrittione dice

Claudia non passa nelle

la

viscere

trovato di piu in questo

stesso

It is

Map.

del quale
S.

Revma

4 stanze
una piscina

sito

longhe p\ 43 larghi palmi 18 [9-56 x 4 metres] et

the Palestrina sheet of the Staff

Monte

del

come

paving-stones may be seen in a newly-made wall along this path.


on the E. edge of the Colonna sheet of the Staff Map.
Presumably this is the villa on the Colle Marcoraino, S. E. of pt. 492 near the

Some

il

me

sub monte, e mi

Angelo ma in quello piu basso sotto


Sempre pero mi rimetto a cio che V.

Ho

as

appunto resta sub Monte

riquadrata per ogni parte di palmi 43 con aquedotto che gira

known

suo pregiatiss. foglio a riconoscere

tempio della Buona Dea per che

latter,

Cappelle nelle vicinanze del Ponte S. Ant da

confermato questo possa essere, perche

son

situated between Gericomio

he writes further as follows (November i8th,

1740): 'sono stato dopo ricevuto

stimate

villa),

Antonio, one-sixth of a mile from the

and the Ponte

W.

nella

edge of

Classical Topography of the

Roman Campagna. II.

carta [a sketch plan which he sends with his letter] e

cotesta dominante nel


di

pozo

{sic)

muro

largo palmi

della d^ piscina al di fuori

197

nella parte versa

si

vede una forma

Per andare da queste a Giriconmio nello stesso

3.

lontano dalla d^ piscina 100 passi mi dicono che ui fosse un pozzo dal

sito

ma

quale scaturiva aqua,

ora

parimente per andare a Giricomio


che dirige

must

alle

si

nell'

correspond

the

less

le

spine.

trova un pezo

Cappelle come meglio

more or

Nel sud

coperto dalla terra e spini.

aqued non potei entrarvi a misurarlo per

with

{sic)

annesso

modern

Nello stesso

sito

di strada antica

foglio.'

path

(This road

due

S.

from

Gericomio.)

Further particulars as to discoveries


in
'

made

in this district are

contained

the following passage of another letter from Petronselli (Oct. 28th, 1739)

La colonna milliare che tempo fa gli scrissi e stata trouata, ed e non colonna
pilo di marmo di sei angoli con un festone intorno sostenuto da doi

ma

parti et in

un angolo

mancante due
S.

Angelo

in parte rotto ui e la

lettere al piu e

in Vail'

presente iscrizione nel principio

questo staua un quarto di miglio lontano da

Arcese nei monti tra

S.

Gregorio e Giricomio,

^IS-MANIB

LVCRETIAESEXSEVERAE
The

inscription

is,

F-

believe, unpublished.

In a letter of Dec. 28th, 1740, Petronselli mentions a double-chambered


'

piscina limaria

'

which he attributes to the Aqua Claudia (probably near

the Colle dello Scoglio)

cf Cassio,

op. cit.

i.

154.

APPENDIX.
notes of Diego Revillas (1690- 1742), to which reference is frequently made,
were acquired by me at the sale of the library of the late Constantino Corvisieri in 1902.
He obtained them from the head of the archives of the monastery of S. Alessio, where

The MS.

Revillas resided

when

in

Rome, and

sold a portion of

The matter contained

retaining the rest himself.

them

in

to the Berlin library in 1873,*

both portions

is

not infrequently

identical.

papers are considerable portions of the MS. of a work, which, according


of drafts of a letter to a person (apparently an Englishman) whom, he
hoped, would patronize it, was to consist of four dissertations in one volume in folio,
the
(i) upon the Viae Tiburtina, Valeria, and Sublacensis, preceded by a disquisition on

my

Among-

to fragments

pt. 2, pp. 65 sqq., iii. pp. in sqq.)


mile and the Roman foot (cf. Diss. Ace. Corton.
upon the aqueducts Anio Vetus, Marcia, Claudia, Anio Novus (3) upon the territory
of Tivoli and the ancient remains contained in it, forming the text to the map published by
Revillas in 1739, Diocesis et Agri Tiburti?ii I'opographia? (4; upon the Marsi, the Lacus

Roman

i.

(2)

emissarium, etc.
di questa regione delineata parimenti con tutta I'esattezza in gran
foglio e di gik incisa in rame,^ e fino dall' anno scorso ne diedi al Sig. Tommaso Denham
una Copia accio la trasmettesse a V.S. lUma.'
In another fragment he says that the work can certainly be ready for the press about

Fucinus and
'

its

La topografia

the beginning of the year 1739 (it is possible, therefore, that the map of the territory
of Tivoli was only published after all hope of the printing of the whole work had
been abandoned), and mentions the encouragement received from Sir Smart LethieuUier
of Aldersbrooke in Essex and Sir Charles Frederick,* with whom he corresponded with
^

C.I.L.

vi. p. Ixiii.

no.

cii.

Stevenson (C^(/. Vat. 10552) gives a copy of part of a letter relating to this very map from Canina
Stando
to Coppi (dated Nov. 7th, 1855), lent him by Card. Nardoni in 1890, which runs as follows
a Tivoli mi venne dato di rinvenire nella libreria dell' Episcopato il rame della importante carta
topografica della Diocesi Tiburtina rilevata dal Revillas che non si sapeva dove esistesse e resa molto
rara, ma solo cognita per una nuova incisione fatta dal Petrowski che cancellando il nome del Revillas
-

'

Mi feci rimettere il detto rame da M. Vescovo di Tivoli e ne feci tirare 50


Either Canina considerably overrates the rarity of the map, or else the copies which not
infrequently come on the market in Rome are some of the fifty which were printed by Canina.

se la fece propria.

copie.'

{C.I.L.

obtained a copy of this


ix.

p.

347),

who

map

in

Rome

only saw a drawing of

in
it,

April,

1905.

It

ac rev. domino Josepho Baronio vigilantissimo Marsorum episcopo

by

Sintes.
*

as described by

is

and bears the date 1735

See Michaelis, Ancient Marbles in Great Britain,

36, p. 61.

'

it

Mommsen

^"^^ '^he dedication

was engraved

at

'ill.

Rome

Appendix.

199

regard to the question of the length of the ancient Roman foot. A letter from the latter
on the point (referred to in Diss. Ace. Corton. iii. 119) is in my possession/ and also the
manuscript of a longer treatise on the same subject, dedicated to these two gentlemen.
Revillas was, like them, a Fellow of the Royal Society, and contributed eight papers,

mostly on astronomical and meteorological subjects, to vols, xxxix.-xlii. of the Philosophical Transactio?is of the Royal Society.
He was also Professor of Mathematics at the
University of Rome, having l)een appointed at the beginning of the year 1725.
It may be of interest to give in full a few passages from a treatise on the Agger
of Servius Tullius, which was probably intended to form part of the work upon the Via
Tiburtina.

The

road before

it

Sed cum

first

(f.

14) deals with the course of

what he believed

to

be the original

reached the Porta Viminalis.

neque in aggere, neque in inaequali


quae hunc antiquae viae ductum aut
uti probabilem, aut saltem possibilem suaderent, vinitorem tandem, quem supra memini,de re hac percontatus, intellexi viam silicibus stratam, ac multis ruderibus coopertam anno
1740, dum excavationes quaedam fiebant, inter plures parietinas detectam fuisse propius
Diocletianas Thermas. Ad locum statim me contuli, quem non nihil reliquo vineae solo
reperi.
Viae directio, vinitore eodem referente, recta et ad rectos angulos versus aggeris
medium tendere animadvert!, ad locum scilicet qui passus circiter C. ab eo distabat,
quem a Fabretto^ designatum dixi. Ibi agger aliquantulum pariter humilior viae sulcum
quodammodo demonstrabat, qui recta similiter porrectus in eandem portam Clausam
'

altentius loca

ilia

contemplarer,

et

solo hinc et inde iacente indicia ulla perspicerem

incidisset

is

ad quam Fabrettus suam viam perduxerat.'


which he gives that the piece of pavement referred

clear from the plan

It is

to (at

D)

of the piscina of the baths of Diocletian, but the lettering is a little


Revillas seems to have been unable to find the prolongation of the road

just to the S.

confused.

outside the Porta Viminalis, the position of which he indicates correctly, for he refers

Viae porro eiusdem per banc [Viminalem


Fabretti's observations, and adds
antiquam] portam directio, ad Viminalem novam [Porta Chiusa] prope meridionale
Castrorum latus ut praediximus tendit. Quodsi hinc secus idem latus, perque occurrentes extra urbem vineas, recta linea ducatur, veteri simul atque hodiernae viae
to

'

Tiburtinae pauUo ultra S. Laurentii Basilicam* haec linea occurret


tractu,

nulla

etsi

viae

veteris

in

quo quidem

vestigia hodie appareant, subter ingestam nihilominus

latitare nullatenus dubitabit quicunque in omnibus per orbem


admirabilem quoad fieri poterat rectitudinem servatam perpendat.
Via ergo haec
haud alia esse potest quam veteris Tiburtinae pars, cui

vinetorum terram ea

Romanum

stratis viis

In this letter Sir Charles Frederick remarks

Carlisle,

ma

la difficolta ch' io trovai di

'

mandato per mezzo di My Lord


mi ha preoccupato.' Lord
of Rome, and may be the person

io vi avrei cio

fame una versione

in

Italiano

was much interested in the antiquities


whose patronage Revillas sought or thought of seeking.
^ He speaks of him a little further back (f.
9) as his informant with regard to the Servian
wall
'quum etenim ab vinitore, qui a multis iam annis vineam colebat, percontarer, num in terrae
eftbssionibus veterum murorum quandoque emersissent, absque haesitatione respondebat, muri non
lateritii, sed quadratis lapidibus exstructi ingentia frusta, multa humo cooperta non uno in loco
He refers either to the Vigna del Certosini or to
secus aggere inventa fuisse, in parte eius extima.'
Carlisle (the fourth earl)

referred to above,

one next
^

De

to

it

within the Villa Peretti (Montalto).

aquis (ed. 17S8), Diss.

From the draft


Albulas,' we may add
*

iii.

tav.

of a paragraph,

the following:

Vicolo delle Mattonellc, as Gori

calls

it

ii.
'

'

De

diversione et mensura viae Tiburtinae ab urbe ad

ubi viatrium

Porta

laevorsum occurrit vinetis inserviens' (the

Basilica di S. Lorenzo, 73).

200

Appendix.

sequut

s (?) temporibus altera recens substituta silicibus minime strata [this is wrong]
quae a Porta S. Laurentii seu nova Esquilina ad veterem viam per huiusce Martyris

Basilicam ducit.
It is

further to be noticed that Revillas adopts Fabretti's view as to the original course

of the Via Collatina that

it diverged from the Via Tiburtina at the Porta Viminalis,


which of course implies that the original Via Tiburtina is the road which in later times
left the city by the Porta Chiusa {supra, 86).
Jordan {Topographie, i. i. 355, n. 26) suggests it as a possibility' 1st dieser statt wie

spiiter eine Abzweigung der Via Tiburtina ursprunglich eine von der porta Viminalis
ausgehende selbstandige Strasse gewesen ? Lanciani, on the other hand, considers that
the road running from the Porta Viminalis to the Porta S. Lorenzo is the original Via
'

Tiburtina {Fortna Urbis,


Revillas

17, 18).

however, alone

in his view that the Via Collatina was cut by the line of the
Aurelian wall midway between the Porta Chiusa and the Porta S. Lorenzo. Of such a
line of road there is no trace, until the Vicolo dell' Osteria (see 87) is reached, i.e. well
is,

outside the Aurelian walls.

Within them the

road has never been discovered^


di Roma, 341) mentions a
'porticina' too close to the Porta S. Lorenzo to have served for an independent road.
Further on (p. 24) we get his views as to the course of the Via Praenestina
Illud equidem indubium esse debet, hodiernam Praenestinam viam, quae laevorsum
ex Porta Majore initium nunc sumit, et veteri post passus circiter
iungitur, tunc
stratam quando clausa fuit porta, quae veteri viae inserviebat, cuius vestigia cum intra,
nor

is

there any postern to

let

it

line of the

pass through.

Nibl^y

{Mura

'

tum extra hodiernos muros


This view
138, 150 n.

is

in

all

though

in vineis est hortis

recognovimus.'

^^ro\)^}a\\\\.y \ricoxxt(:\ ici.

Papers of the British School at Rome, \.


be
he

interesting to note that the road through the postern could


traced in Revillas' day, and also in Nardini's time, for in his Roma Antica (1666)

says

i),

dentro

it

mura

is

scorge fra vigne il solco della strada, per cui vi s'andava (p. 39
whereas Lanciani, Forma Urbis, 24, 25, gives no indication of it.
Bufalini's plan of Rome (1551) sheet A3 of the reproduction published in Rome in 1879
indicates what would seem to be a road running outside the city wall at right angles
to it, but this starts, not from the postern, which in the original (sheet ST') is clearly
indicated, but from the N.W. side of the next tower but one to the N.W.

= ed.

'

iv. vol.

i.

le

p. 75;

si

'

ADDENDA TO
P. 137,

1.

29.

Several

PAPERS, Vol.

instalments 01

I.,

Pp. 125-281.

monograph on the Via


now appeared {Archivio dcUa Societa Romatta

Professor Tomassetti's

Praenestina and Via Labicana have

di Storia Patria^ 1902, 61 sqq.; 1903, 165 sqq.\ 1904, 461 sqq.; 1905, 115 sqq.).
I
shall not as a rule deal with the additional points raised by him, but shall content
P. 140,

myself by giving a general reference to his articles.


1. 7.
The statement in the text is not correct. In working from Rome, it is true,
the line of the road seems to disappear just to the W. of Casale Bertone
but,
though it is blocked now by a modern wall, its cutting through the hill to the N.
of Casale Bertone is still well preserved, though at present occupied by a gigantic

manure heap
recognizable,

It

then passes across some

and enters a cutting

just

flat ground where no traces of it are


behind the powder magazine a little way to

the N.E. of the railway station called Prenestina.


Here it follows the line of the
aqueduct, which soon crosses to its southern edge (cf p. 140, n. i), and of a

boundary

line

between two properties

Cingolani's map, and

On

may

which, however,

is

not clearly traceable in

not therefore be very old.

N. side are traces of the foundations of a round tomb, and the remains of
made out a little
further to the N.
From this point the road descends still in a cutting towards the valley of the
Fosso Gottifredi. A little after it emerges on to the low ground, traces of a tomb
constructed of travertine blocks appear between the aqueduct and the railway. To
the N. of the road are the remains of a villa in opus reticiilatum and brick one of
the bricks bore the stamp C.I.L. xv. 432, belonging to the end of the 2nd century
To the E. of this point two large paving-stones may be seen lying
after Christ.
loose in the field and to the E. again, on the further bank of the stream, and still
on the N. of the road, are the remains of another villa. It must have been close to
this point that a small portion of the pavement of an ancient road was discovered
Professor Gatti
in 1886, though its exact position and direction are not recorded.
has been kind enough to inform me, however, that it crossed the railway obliquely,
and it depends on the acuteness of the angle whether or no it belonged to the Via
CoUatina, which should run almost in the same straight line with the railway.
If indeed it were not for this discovery, one would be tempted to believe that
the road might have kept to the N. of the railway, and run just to the S. of the
mediaeval (or late classical) ruins at point 26 (see map i), for there is a dip in the
field which seems to mark the line of an ancient road.
These quarries are thus referred to by Strabo (v. 3. 11, p. 238) ivnvQfv Se
P. 141, 1. 15.
(from Tibur) 6t'^ficri (the Anio) nib'iov fyKapTroTaTov irapa ra fXfraWa tov \idov tov
its

a vaulted structure, either a tomb, or part of a villa which can be

Addenda to

202

Papers, Vol.

Ti^ovprivov Koi rov eu FaBlois rov

is

Pp.

125-281.

epvdpov Xcyofxevov, ware

ttjv (K tSuv /ieraXXcoi/

nXdardiv tpyatv t^s 'Pto/xrjs (vrtvOeu


perhaps to these quarries that Vitruvius (ii. 7. i) refers as pro-

f^ayaiyrji' koi ttjv Tvop6p.(iav tvp-apr)

KaracTKeva^opevwi'. It

Kcil

I.,

reXtoa dvai,

touv

ducing a soft stone


'sunt
ahae molles, uti sunt circa urbem Rubrae Pallenses
Fidenates Albanae,' though it is not impossible that he is speaking of Saxa
Rubra or ad Rubras on the Via Flaminia (Nxbby, Anah'si, iii. 31 C.I.L. xi. p. 567).
Further investigations have made it clear that the branch spoken of as
P. 148,1. 13.
going due E. after crossing the Osa itself divides into two. One of these branches
runs in a north-easterly direction through a cutting which a modern quarry line
crosses on an embankment, passing just S.E. of the tombs mentioned on p. 146,
1.
Traces of it are, naturally, not to be found in the flat
20, and S. of point 47.
river valley, but it reappears just to the S. of the Casale della Lunghezzina, where
its cutting is clear.
Further to the E. a few of its paving-stones are to be found
scattered about
it passes just to the N. of point 40, and S. of the remains of a
villa, which, besides fragments of brick, include a portion of a rectangular or square
structure of travertine
an area paved with slabs, and enclosed by blocks of the
same stone with a plinth moulding on the inner side, which is carried round the
angles, while the outer side goes straight down.
Only one side of the area can be
measured, and that is yb metres long. It cannot be the edging of a peristyle, for
the plinth moulding is not appropriate for a step, and it is probably the interior
of some chamber possibly a tomb with walls of blocks of travertine.
:

To the S.W. and S.E. of this building are scanty traces of brick.
The further course of the road is uncertain, but there are a few
which, in

probability, belong to

all

it

in the field

paving-stones

opposite the point where the

sulphurous water from the Aquae Albulae discharges into the Anio.
It is a
curious fact that the selce extends as far as the S. bank of the river at this point
:

no doubt a lava stream from the crater of the lake of Gabii. To the N. of the
Botte deir Acqua (which supplies the Fontanile Cecapesci) are the remains of two
Roman reservoirs, one of them well preserved, divided into two chambers each 3
metres wide and 6"o5 metres long by a wall 43 cm. thick, with an opening in the
middle r27 m^tre wide
the outer walls are 60 cm. thick
of the other, more to
the N.E., only the outline is preserved.
There are traces of other buildings,
including a fragment of a column oi giallo andco.
it

is

The road continued, apparently, to the N.E., but over the flat alluvial land it
cannot be traced, though a i&^ paving-stones are to be found in the bridge at point
40, W. of the Fontanile delle Monichelle.

From this point, or a little to the N. of it, it seems to have ascended a valley to
the E.N.E., passing to the N. of point 84 on the map, and to the S. of the remains
of a villa on the top of the Colle Cesarano. A few paving-stones may be seen here,
but not in situ.
It then appears to have descended, turning at right angles,
through a cutting (the traces of which have been to a considerable extent
obliterated by a modern farm track), passing just to the S. of some ruins at point
72 (now almost entirely destroyed) marked in Bulgarini's map.
Here it joined the
present road, without, as it would seem, crossing it immediately.
It is just possible
that a branch kept along on the top of the hill near point 85, but the evidence is
insufficient.

Returning

to the crossing

the road, which runs due E.

stones

may

be seen

in

over the Osa, we

may now

follow the other branch of

passes not very far N. of the Mola

its pavinga fieldwall at the point where the lane to the Casale della

It

Addenda to

Papers, Vol.

I.,

Pp.

125-281.

203

Lunghezzina goes ofif. To the S. of it at this point are the traces of a building. It
passes not very far N. of the grotto described on pp. 177 sqq.^ leaving the remains
of a villa on the N., which lie just S. of point 61 (Segnale Muro di Cinta), and here
many loose paving-stones belonging to it are to be seen on the top of the hill.
It then descends by a clearly marked cutting into the valley to the E., passing to the
S. of some mediaeval ruins built over some rock-cut passages, which probably
served as water cisterns, andreascends gradually, with one turn to the N., resuming
its original direction near the top of the hill.
There it passes through some large

selce quarries,

now abandoned, and probably

of

Roman

date,i then descending-

ground, and cannot easily be traced


into the other branch which we followed first.

reaches the

flat

alluvial

but

it

must soon

fall

The two roads of which we have been speaking have a certain interest, inasmuch as one or other of them (generally the southern) appears in most of the maps
of the Campagna hitherto published as a prolongation of the Via Collatina, their
course being sometimes distorted in order to square with the erroneous theory that
CoUatia stood at Castellaccio.

The earliest map of the Campagna known to me an unsigned map, dated 1557,
and bearing the arms of Paul IV forms an exception, as it shows the road from
Rome to Lunghezza, and then, quite correctly, the road from Lunghezza (or near it)
to Lunghezzina and 'feriera' no doubt a house near the
sorgente d'acqua

'

ferruginosa.'

Ameti

map

and Cingolani {TopoN. of Casale Benzone


(corresponding so far with the correct course of the Via Collatina see p. 144), then
running to Castellaccio, then across the S. end of the Pantano di Guazzo (now
called Pantano di Granaraccio) to the cutting E. of Colle Fiorito, on the road to
S. Vittorino.
They probably mean it to fall into the line of the modern Via di
Poli at the bend between the 17th and i8th kilometres (cf. p. 177).
(// Lasto), Fabretti

grafia de/P

{De Aquis,

opp.

Agro Rojnano) mark a road passing

to

p. 90),

the

Nibby {Afuilisi, map) marks a still paved road running from the Osteria dell'
Osa to the sharp bend of the Via di Poli between the 17th and i8th kilometres, and
then in a straight line to the N.E. end of the Villa of Hadrian, falling, no doubt, into
the road passing by Casale Galli.
His Via Collatina, after passing Castellaccio,
runs to the Osteria

dell'

Osa.

Canina (in his map of the Campagna, repeated xnEdifizi^ v. tav. ii.) takes the
road first from Lunghezza to Casale Lunghezzina, and then across the flat ground
and the Colle Cesarano to join the road from Ponte Lucano to Le Cappannelle at
Ponte Lungo della Foce.
It is he and Nibby who come nearest to the truth.
P. 149, n. 2.
Hiilsen {Rhein. Mus. 1890, 284) is inclined to attribute the milestone bearing the number 7 (which originally served to support a bust of Annia Regilla in the
estate of Herodes Atticus known as the Triopeion) to the Via Labicana, and not to
the Praenestina, which was further away from the place where it first stood.
It
was found in the garden of the monastery of S. Eusebio on the Esquiline in 1698,
having been brought there to serve as building material.

'
Some way to the S. of the road, on the E. edge of the Fosso di S. Giuliano, is the foundation
of a rectangular tomb, and to the S. of this a villa, while the Casa Saponara stands close to another*;
on the N. edge of the modern Via di Poli is a water reservoir, with a villa to the E. of it ; and

there are traces of a fourth villa on the

Cecapesci.
.the valley,

same ridge to the N. of the road, S.E. of the Fontanile


seems probable, therefore, that a road ran N. and S. either along the ridge or along
but no traces of it appear to exist.
It

Addenda to

204
p. 159,

1.

30.

It

is

modern road

I.,

Pp.

125-281.

possible that this road was the Via yPraenestina

in

itself, for

in

the

no traces of pavement and Graham {pp. cit. 6)


cf also
1819 the road ran close under ITor de' Schiavi

at this point there are

speaks as though
Canina, Edifizi, vi.

tav. 76.

1. 14.
A statue of Juno(?) was found lying upon this pavement it is now at
Boynton (Michaelis, Anctcnt Marbles in Great Britain., p. 216, no. 1).
A sarcophagus with the battle between the Athenians and Amazons was
171, 1. 7.
found in this tenuta ^ in 1744, and given to the Capitoline Museum by Benedict
XIV (Ficoroni, mem. 88, in Fea, Misc. i. 160 Helbig, op. cit. i. no. 530). At
Prato Bagnato, though, according to Michaelis (who places it on the Rome side of
Tor de' Schiavi Ancient Marbles in Great Britain, 346), about 1760,^ La Piccola
also found the statues nos. 30, 32, and the head no. 108 of the Ince collection (the
inscription 'Rovnakoi iiroUi on the plinth of no. 30 is a forgery
Kaibel, I.G.I.
The heads nos. 102, 184, 185 are noted as having been found 'on the Via
135*).

P. 164,

P.

Papers, Vol.

Praenestina.'

Excavations 'at Lunghezza' produced several busts in the same collection


117, 120, 148 (said to have been found 'near Lacus Gabinus,' like 198, 199,
so that these may have come from a separate excavation), 163, 182, 183, 193, 198,
As the objects were apparently not acquired from La Piccola, but some of
199).
them from Volpato and Jenkins, it is impossible to be sure whether they came
from the same site as those mentioned above.
P. 177, 1. 16.
The pavement of this road may be seen to the N. of point 58 (the villas
along its course are all marked a little too far S.).
Here it is crossed by a branch
road, which ascends from the valley of the Osa and, after going on W. for a while,,
bifurcates
the W. branch probably joins the road coming N.N.W. from the 14th
kilometre of the Via Praenestina (p. 175, 1. i), while the S. branch would fall into the
road which diverges from it N.E. by N. {ibid. I. 3). On the main road to the S. of
point 58 are the remains of a tomb, and a sepulchral cippus with a portrait head,
the inscription of which has perished.
I. 21.
A kilometre E.S.E. of the 20th kilometre of this road are the remains of a

villa
vaulted substructures and a little further in the same direction is a reservoir
and about 200 yards S. of the Casale Granaraccio another. Pinza in the map
given with his article on Gabii {Bull. Com. 1903, 325, Fig. i) marks this road 'Via
Labicana
a palpable error.
28.
1.
The remains of a large villa exist on the Colle Tasso, to the N. of this

cutting
and it is here that Revillas in his map indicates Aesulae forte rudera.'
P. 180, 1. 16.
An important article by Pinza on Gabii and its remains has appeared in
Bull. Com. 1903, 321 sqq., which supplements my account in several points.
Among the numerous illustrations will be found an accurate plan of the temple
nos.

'

'

and photographs of the pottery found

in the

tomb now

in the

Museo

di

Papa

Giulio.

It is

somewhat

incorrectly described as being outside the Porta Salaria

by the

authorities^

cited.

This date seems to be correct for the discovery of the statues, but not for that of the
compare Visconti, op. var. ii. 445, with Amaduzzi, Nov. Fior. 1786, 185, 295. As tothe locality, it may be noted that Visconti places it close to the Acqua Bollicante, which is on the
Rome side of Tor de' Schiavi but in this case the tenuta must have been much larger than it is^
2

inscriptions

now.

In any case,

'

right

'

is

a mistake (copied from Amaduzzi) for

'

left.'


Addenda to
P. 185, n.

of

Papers, Vol.

Pp. 125-281.

The pavement of this road has recently been discovered


I.
Monte Falcone, in the course of agricuUural operations. Close

the ruins of a part of what

unknown

may have been

a bathing establishment

extent,'floored with large slabs of spcrone

stucco mouldings, which


while springs
reservoir
;

205

N.N.W.

to the
to

were found

it

building of

also fragments of ornamental

make it impossible to suppose


may still be noticed here.

that

it

was merely a water

A little further to the W., at the fountain marked in the map {Papers^ i.
found the right half of a brickstamp, which appears to be unpublished

map

iv.),

/lV5

'

\S VL

M
I

The person referred to

is Frederick, fourth earl of Bristol, Bishop of Derry.


which he had formed in Rome was plundered and dispersed in
1798, so that the fate of the mosaic pavement is uncertain (Michaelis, op. cit. io8).
The apse of this building has recently collapsed, so that the photograph
194,1. 12.
The mortar used in its construction was of
(Fig. 14) has an interest of its own.
very bad quality. Among the fragments of bricks (no whole bricks were to be
seen) which were used in the wall, several bore stamps three of them apparently
belong to the first century A.D.- C.I.L. xv. 2303, 2330a, and another of similar
character to the first, but which appears to be unpublished

p. 187,

1.

4.

The

P.

I.,

collection

C-GEM -RVF'Q

Gemini Rufi

C.

qiiiaestoris

Other fragments were found, which I have not been able to


fragment of an inscription of the 2nd century

identify,

also

P. 198,

1.

2.

To the N. of the W. end of the

2-50 metres wide, running 15^

W.

of

Casale di Pantano the pavement of a road


S., has recently been found, at about 4 feet

but we
in neither direction can its prolongation be traced
below ground level
were informed that the whole basin of Pantano was traversed by ancient roads,
which were frequently discovered in the course of agricultural operations.
This inscription has recently come to light again, having been used as
1. 27.
Visconti's copy of it is quite correct,
building material in the Casale at Pantano.
but he does not mention the fact that a N was cut before TRA, and then erased
;

,,

as an obvious
which he gives

The

error.

failed to see, too, the points after

inscription

is

and the

DVCTVM

On

31 in thickness, the first three lines

high),

DIVI and

the other hand, there is clearly one after QVAM.


carved upon an entablature of travertine 73 cm. in height and

in his copy.

occupying the frieze (the letters being 45


being 65 mm. high).

last the architrave (the letters

mm.

Addenda to

2o6
p. 198,

1.

Papers, Vol.

125-281.

Pr.

I.,

A further examination of the milestone, in company with Prof.

32.

Hiilsen, has-

There are certainly traces of a numeral (no doubt an

led to the following result.

X) before the III. The pramomcn at the beginning of the third line is either
L{udus) or P{iiblitis). There are no signs of any letter Ijefore CVR, the surface
being much weathered. The stone is now in the Musco delle Terme.

III

M- POPILLI
It

CAItCILI

F
F

Q-

CVR
p.

204

1.

6.

In the map added to

veteris oppidi
P. 220,

'

Fabretti, de Aqids, ed.

ii.

(opp. p. 90),

we

find 'rudera

indicated on the Colle Vigna.

first milestone of the Via Labicana was discovered in 1903 about 200
1. 3. -The
metres outside the Porta Maggiore not iJt si/u, but at no great distance from its
original position. It was erected by Vespasian in A.D. "jj {Bull. Com. 1903, 371

Rom. Mitt. 1903, 336).


1. 13.
It seems as though the tomb of the Fonteii had been previously discovered
four busts, with the relief of a man sitting and paying out
and partly excavated
money, and an inscription of a dispcnsator Volusiac Torquaiae are mentioned
{Arch. Zeit. 1847-48, p. 5*) cf. Tomassetti, Arch. Soc. Rom. Stor. Patr. 1902, -j-j.
The Vigna Lepri is on the left of the road, not on the right. Here was
27.
1.
Not. Scav. 1903, 513

P.

322

found

recently

{C.I.L.

vi.

1.

12.

sepulchral

on

inscription

slab

of

peperino,

senarii

in

36525).

At either the second or the third kilometre of the modern road {Bull.

Coin.

Not. Scav. 1903, 200, the third) a sepulchral cippus


with inscription, a terracotta sarcophagus, and remains of tombs were found in
digging for the foundations of a house.
P. 226, 1. 3. Nibby {Schcde., i. cover) notes a slab of travertine at the second osteria to
the right after Torre Pignattara, bearing the following inscription in good
1903, 299, says the

lettering

second

IN-FRONTE
P-XLV
IN

AGRO

P-LXXXIIII

1.

14.

Another copy of this inscription

is

given by Tomassetti, Arch. Soc. Rom.

Stor. Patr. 1902, 79, n. i.


The inscription C.I.L.
P. 227, 1. 29.

p. 88, n.) states,

the Via Latina

vi. 1324 was not found here, as Tomassetti {op. cit.


but between the 7th mile of the Via Labicana and the 7th mile of
nor is it a milestone {Bull. Inst. 1S65, 84).

The

two groups of remains indicated in the map at point 53 and just N. of


to the
it (to the S. of the Torre di Centocelle) belong to one very large villa
S.S.E. at point 54 there are two other mounds of ruins, about 50 yards apart.
2.
In the remains of this villa I found several fragments of the brickstamp
238,

P. 229,

1.

I.

P.

1.

C.I.L. XV. 781 (ist century A.D.).


P. 240,

1.

10.

villas

On

the

hill

known

as Passo del

Lombardo

are the remains of several

and of a very large subterranean water reservoir with quadripartite vaulting

Addenda to

arches

six

There
which

is

in

Papers, Vol.

one direction, and seven

I.,

Pp.

each of about 3 metres span.


W. the pavement of
Luciano which starts from the Via

in the other,

also a road descending through the valley to the

is,

in places, to

be seen

in the

207

125-281.

Fosso

di

Cavona.
P. 240,

At the

Dama two fragments of maiolica were found in 1901


and the discovery of considerable remains of the Roman,
villa, and of a mediaeval church built into it, is described by Grossi-Gondi in Bull.
He appears to consider the road running 30 S. of W. to be
Com. 1902, 105 sqq.
a part of that which led up to Tusculum, making it leave the Via Labicana at the
1.

34.

villa of

{Nof. Scav. 1901, 202)

Grotte
;

and not, as I do, at the 9th.


15. Another inscription found here is given in Bull. Com. 1902, 323. Near
this was probably the place known as La Selvotta, where the discovery of a villa>
with various fragments of decorative marbles and the brickstamps C.I.L. xv. 705,
loth mile,

P. 243,

1.

1st century A.D.), is noted in Not. Scav. 1901, 484.


Other discoveries made between the lothand 14th mile of the Via Labicana by
Padre Grossi-Gondi are described by him in Bull. Cotn. cit. 321 sqq.
it occurred
P. 251, n. 2. This stamp has been already published in Not. Scav. 1899, 50
on several tiles forming the floor of a drain running from the temple of Vesta
towards the house of the Vestals, and is attributed to the ist century A.D.
P. 254, 1. 26. The church of S. Hyacinthus has been discovered by Padre Grossi-Gondi
{Bull. Com. cit.).
I
may notice in this connexion that I did not mean in n. 2. to
imply that the catacomb of the SS. Quattro Coronati was anywhere in the
neighbourhood of the 14th mile. Its site is, as I quite recognize, undetermined.

1244a (end of

21.
1.
Tomassetti in a recent article, which is also of considerable importance,
and should be consulted for various points of detail (Z>z.r^. Accad. Pont. Arcli. vii.
45 sqq.) upon discoveries in the territory of Labici, remarks that Monte
Salomone, if not the site of the primitive town, was certainly an ancient fortress

P. 263,

he also mentions that the ditches now to be seen there are remains of recent
fortifications thrown up by the Spanish troops.
P. 264, 1. 17.
Specimens of early Latin pottery, with a scyphos of Proto- Corinthian type,
were found in a vineyard near Colonna belonging to Giuseppe Crescenzi, in 1902,
but details as to their discovery were not forthcoming {Not. Scav. 1902, 115).
Arch.
P. 269, 1. 3. For this building cf. Tomassetti, Diss. Ace. Pont. Arch. vii. 57 sqq.

Soc.

Rom.

Stor. Patr. 1904,

461 sqq.

ADDENDA TO

2o8
P. 20,

1.

P. 21,

1.

however Not. Scav. 1905,

Cf.

15.

PAPERS, Vol.

III.,

39.

should have been mentioned that the figure


duction of the stamp.
10.

P. 41, n.

3.

It

Cancel

from 'two others

substitute the following

'
:

and

Pp. 1-197.

in the Capitol'

to

in the text is a full-size repro-

'drunken old woman' and

also of portions of two groups belonging to a cycle

representing the labours of Hercules. A statue of Hercules came to light first of


all, belonging, as a matter of fact, to a group of Hercules and the Kerynaean
stag: this, however, was not realized, and when, shortly afterwards, a fragment
with part of the Hydra came to light, the sculptor Algardi tried to fit it on to the
Hercules, and, failing to do this, proceeded to employ the motive, and to restore the
Hercules as killing the Hydra. The statue, thus restored, is now in the Capitol
{ibid. i. no. 412), and the fragment of the Hydra stands beside it.
A statue of a
drunken old woman, found here also, is in the same museum.'
Cf. also Durm, Bankunst der Etrusker iind Romer, ed. ii. (1905), p. 286,
P. 45, 1. 15.

'Ecloge'
290.

fig.

was first substituted for Egloge,' the reading of the MSS., in the
5.
Bale edition of 1533 (see Roth's appa7-atiis criticus).
Mr. Stuart Jones proposes to read Kati/mras-, a name which, in other
P. 61, n. 2.
passages, has given the copyists some trouble (cf. the apparatus criticus to Dionys.
P. 47,

1.

'

and

32

ii.

Plut. Ro7n. 16),

the usual confusion of

TEAAHN

taken for

^eLBrji/aiovs is

(t

and which they sometimes reproduced as

and

and

r]

at.

KENIN

Kei/ivt'ray,

with

might, he thinks, have been easily mis-

being of the same value owing to itacism), whereas

not very close to the

MSS.

This reading

suits the context quite as

well {itifra, 65 sqq.).


P. 69.

I.
The fact to which Pliny alludes is rather, as Mr. Stuart Jones points out, the
choice of the Anio by Augustus as the bcrundary of Regio I. Nissen, Italischc
Landcskiindc, ii. 464, suggests that Fidenae and Nomentum (and the same applies

1.

which he does not name) are mentioned by Pliny in the lists of both
and Regio IV, because they possessed territory on both banks of the
Anio. The supposition is quite a possible one in the case of Fidenae, but it
would make the territory of the other two towns far more e.xtensive than we have
any other reason to suppose it to have been (cf. C.I.L. xiv. pp. 440, 447, 453).
12.
The peacock has a place in the symbolism of Christian art, and is spoken
1.
of by S. Augustine {Dc Civ. Dei, Ixxi. 4) as typifying immortality, owing to a belief
current in his day that its flesh never decayed.
Frohner, Collection
Cf.
to Ficulea,

Regio

P. 71,

Tyszkiewicz,
P. 72,

The

p. 68, no. 187.

church

is spoken of as
S. Maria in fundo Argisano' in a document
recording its restoration in 11 11 by Ottaviano I, Count of Palombara, to the
Benedictine monks of S. Giovanni in Argentella {infra, 177), which is now preserved in the Archivio di Stato at Rome among the archives of S. Silvestro in

28.

1.

Capite.
P. 153,

am

indebted to Signor Bonfigli for this information.

29. It is not necessary to suppose that the same excavations are described
here and i?7fra, 159,7?;/. On the other hand, it is fairly clear that those described
1.

here

11.

30 sqq. are identical with those mentioned infra, 160, 11. i sqq. certain
list of statues are probably due to error on his part.
This footnote should be cancelled.
Cf. however Bernoulli, Rom. Ikonographie, ii. i. p. 367.
The place where this bridge is situated is called Quarto Pomata {supra,
;

discrepancies in Sebastiani's
P. 181, n.
P. 188,

P. 195,

'

I.

1.

23.

I.

25.

147,. n.

i).

INDEX.
Note.
ACQUORIA, Ponte

Names

belonging

loS sqq, 149 n.\

dell',

to

the

150

sqq.

Ad Novas
38
Aejlamis

(= Vicus Novits = Qi\.&x\z. Nuova),

8,

classical period

are

i7i

italics.

Belladonna, 49
Belli, Vigna, 81 sqq.
Belli, Casino, 77,

176

Bellini, Casale, 166


tnoiis,

Bertone, Casale, 201

133 sqq., 196

= Allia),

Aeftila, 131 n., \-^ziqq., 172

Bettina, Fosso

Aelius Riibrius, Villa

S. Biagio, Colle,

of,

195

Aesiila, see

Bona Dea, Temple

Affliano,

Brancadoro, Villa, 92

Aefula
Monte, see Aefula

23 sqq., 49 n.^

76
of the, 134 sqq,

Agger oi Servius Ttillitis, 199


S. Agnese, Church of, 41 sqq., 208
S. Agnese, Vicolo di, 12, 13, 40
Aguzzano, Tenuta di, 52, 100

Braschi, Villa, 192


Brutus, Villa of (so-called), 191 sqq.

Alberoni, Vicolo degli, 12

Bulgarini, Colle, 130

S. Alexander,

Cemetery

of,

Buffalotta,
Buffalotta,

Fosso della, 23
Via della, 47, 48

63
Via,

Allia, 23 sqq.

Caecilia,

Ameriola, 183, 187


S. Andrea, Grotta di, 34
S. Angelo in Arcese, Munte, 133 sqq.
S. Angelo Romano or in Capoccia, 179, 183,

Caenina, 65 sqq., 173, 208


Caesonii, Villa of the, 128 j-^^.

185,

Angelo in Piavola,
Anio Novns, 135, 194

Anio, River,

160, 163

Cappellone,

203
Anio Vetus, 44, 135, 192, 193 n.\ 194
16, 45, 97, 126,

Antemnae, 14 sqq.
S. Anthimus, Church
S.

of,

119
Antonio, Casale (on the Via Nomentana), 65
S. Antonio, Monastery of (at Tivoli), 161 sqq.
S. Antonio, Colle (near Vitriano), 171
S.

S.

Antonio, Ponte, 133, 196

6".

Symphorosa, Church

di,

190 sqq.

Cassius, Villa of (so-called), 153, 191 Sqq.

Castel Cesi, 55
Castel Chiodato, 58, 71

Vigna

Franz,

Vigna

Vigna), 43
Castelluccio, 176

Castra Praetoria, II, 38, 86

n.'^

Catullus, Villa of (so-called), 163

Bagni

delle

of),

Carolano, Fosso, 32 sqq.


Casa Cotta, Cantoniera, 29, 31

Castelli,

71

dell',

II

114
Capreae Palus, 44
Caprine, Le, 126

Castel Giubileo, 17, 22

sqq.

Arcione, Castell', 114, 115

Arco Oscuro, Vicolo

166

Carciano, Strada

31

Antonio, Casale (near Lago della Regina),

Aquae Albulae, W]
Aquae Labanae, 28,

Ca?neria, 76, 77, 83, 183

Campo Limpido,

Capannelle, Osteria delle, 130, 137


Capobianco, 64

186

S.

7,

Acque Albule, 117

sqq.

Cavaliere, Casale del, 112

Barco, Casaccia del, 122 sqq.

Cavallari, Casale dei, 103

S. Basilio, Casale,

Cavamonte, 140

99

Battista, Casale, 169, 175, 180

Cecapesci, Fontanile, 202

Maraini,

2IO

Index.

Cecchina, Casale della, 52


Cecchina, Torraccio della, 53
Cerino, Colle, 108

Fidenae, 17 sqq., 25, 48


S. Filippo, Vicolo di, 9, 10
Fiora, 28 sqq.,

83

"j^,

Cesarano, Colle, 12% sqq.

Fiorito, Colle, 131

Cesarina, Casale della, 59


Chiusa, Porta, 86, 199, 200

Fontana, Vicolo della, 12


Forno, Osteria del, 103

Cigliano, Colle,

Fosse, Le, 126

Claudia, Aqua, 135, 196, 197

S. Francesco, 177
Franz,
Vigna (

173
Civitas Figlma, 13

Civitella, La, 187

Clivus Cucumeris, 9
Coazzo, Casale, 59
Coazzo, Ruderi del, 53, 58, 99
Coccanari, Casale, 169
Cocceio, Villa

169
CoUatiiia, Via, 200, 201 sqq.
di,

Collegio Irlandese, 190


Cot Una, Porta,
S.

7,

= Castelli, Vigna =

Maraini,

Vigna), 43
Fuscus, Villa of (so-called), 195 n.^

Gattaceca,

71

S. Genesius, Oratory

of,

93

Gennaro, Monte, 77
Gentile, Monte, 65
Gericomio, 145, 146, 196, 197
Giacchetti, Colle, 58

38

Colomba, Casale,

49 n.^

26,

Colonnella, Colle della, 176

Lago delle, 117 sqq.


Constantia, Mausoleum of, 42

S. Giovanni in Argentella, 177, 178

S. Giovanni in Camporazio, 136

Giovanni, Lago, 119

Colonnelle,

S.

Corcolle, 138 sqq.

Greci, Villa dei (=Collegio Irlandese), 190


S. Gregorio, 134

Corese, Fosso, 33 sqq.

Corniculum,

56,

Corzano, Grotte
S. Costanza,

65 n.\ 183, 186

Grotta Marozza, 28, 71

169

di,

Church

of,

42

Creta, Osteria della, 34, 36, 76


Crostarosa, Vigna, 43

Crustumerium, 23, 50, 51


Cupa, Via, 87, 88, 93, 94

Grottoline, 72

Cures, 34 sqq.
Cynthia, Villa of (so-called), 153 sqq., 208

Catacomb

DiAVOLO, Ponte

of,

del, 8,

Grolta Papale, 195


Grotta Volpe, 34
Grotte Sconce, 194
Grotte di Torri, 35, 36
Grottelle, Le, 175

Cretone, 72

S. Cyriaca,

Greppe, Casale di, 57


Grosso, Ponte, 82 sqq.

89 sqq.

Hadrian, Villa of, 142, 143


Temple of, 130
S. Hippolytus, Catacomb of, 93
Hercules,

Horace, Villa

37

of,

136, 16 1 sqq.

Diavolo, Sedia del, 45

Incastko, Monte

dell',

104

Eretum, 8, 26 sqq., 71
S. Ermo, Chapel of, 125

Inviolata, Torraccio dell', 105

Esquilina, Porta, 85 sqq.


S. Eusebio, Torre, 103

Labicana, Via, 206, 207


Leonina, Casale, 142, 189 n.
S. Lorenzo, Church of, 89 sqq., 199
S. Lorenzo, Porta, 85 sqq., 200
Lucano, Ponte, 109, no, 12.6 sqq.

S. Eutyches,

Cemetery

Fabbrica Palmieri,

of,

70

34, 70, 176

Faccenda, Casale, 174

Ltuilius Paetus, Mausoleum

Farinelli, Colli, 164, 171

Lunghezza, 113, 202


Lunghezzina, Casale

Faustiniano, Colle, 132 sqq., 196


Favale,

II,

Ficana, 55
Ficulea, 13, 59 sqq
Ficuknsis, Via,

5,

della, 202,

Lungo, Colle, 185


Lupara, Torre, 65

166

55

Madano, Monte,

of,

78, 83, .84

12

203

Index.
Madonna della Querela, 8, 38
Maecenas, Villa of (so-called), 150
Magugliano, Fosso
Magliano or
Simone,

Fosso

di

= Pratolungo,

Nofmtilmii, 68 sqq.

Norba, 79
(

= Marco

Fosso

di),

Malpasso, Ponte

di,

23

Manimolo, Ponte, 97

sqq.

Mancini, Torre, 66
Manzi, Casale, 71, 208
(

d',

63

67

= Castelli, Vigna= Franz,


Pai.amento, Fosso, 81

Vigna), 43
Marcellina, 173, 174
Marcellina Vecchia, 176

Marcia, Aqua, 86

sqq., 135,

Parioli,

di,

S. Pastore, 152, 155, 165,

Paterno, Carrara

= Magliano,

Fosso),

103, 186

Marco Simone, Laghetto

di,

104

Marcoraino (or Mercorano), Colle, 134, 196


S. Maria della Strada, 188, 189
Marmorata, La, 92
Marocco, Colle, 178
Martellona, Casale,

Via

Parioli,

55

di

dei, 9
Viale dei (=Viale della Regina), 39 sqq.
Passerano, 139, 140

194

Marcigliana Vecchia, 24, 26


Marco, S. (near Tivoli), 188

Marco Simone, Casale


Marco Simone, Fosso

sqq.

Fabbrica, 34, 70, 176


Palombara, 76 sqq.

Palmier!

Marcigliana, Casale della, 24

no, 116

Mastorta, Torre, 106, 108, 179


Mednllia, 172 n.\ 175, 183, 186
Medusa, Tomba della, 86, 87

n.^

del, 151

148

di,

169

n.'

Patinaria, Via, 47
Pazzi, Casale dei, 52

Pedeschiavo, Colle, 72
Pedicate, Le, 84

Pedum, 140
Petrucci, Casale, 122

Phaon, Villa

of,

46

Piccolomini, Vigna, 93
Pichini, Casale, 57
Pietralata,

Tenuta

di,

Pietralata, Vicolo di,

Tenuta

Pilo Rotto,

sqq.

Mercato, Ponte, 37
Molette, Osteria delle, 56, 57
Monastero, Casale, 99 n.

96
40
106

del,

Pinciana, Via, 10
Pisoni, Villa dei, 188
Pissina, Grotte della, 184, 185

Plancus, Villa of (so-called), 188, 189

Tomb

of the, 127

Montecelio, 106, 179, 181 sqq.

Plautii,

Monte Libretti, 74 sqq.


Monte Maggiore, 31
Monte Rotondo, 26 sqq.
Monte Venere, 83

Poggio Cesi, 186

Monteverde, 174 sqq.


Alontes Cortiiculani, see Corniculum

Ponte Terra, Fosso

Monticelli, see Montecelio

Praetiesltna, Via, 200, 203 sqq.

Moricone, 76, 83, 84


Moricone, Osteria di, 29, 74

Praetorian

Nardi, Vigna, 94
Nerola, Osteria,

{Aa Novas

Vicus Novus), 8, 38
Oufpearts TroTa/xos, 1 36 n."

Mantellate, Casale delle, 165

Mondo, Tempio

(or Oleole), 61,

Orviniuin, 83
Oscura, Valle, 57
Osteria, Vicolo dell', 87, 93
Osteria Nuova del Massacci

Malatiscolo, Colle, 174

Menlana, 68

Olkvano

Oro, Monte

102, 103, 186

Maraini, Vigna

211

8,

n.'-'

Poli, 137
Poll,

Via

di,

130 sqq.

Policlinico, 87
di,

147, 195

Portonaccio, Casale del, 95

Camp,

see Castra Praetoiia

Prati, Casale dei, 179,

180

Pratolungo, Fosso

di

= Magliano,

Fosso

102
37

Nocelle, Colle, 167 sqq,

.5'5'.

Primus and Felicianus, Cemetery


Catacomb of, 14

S. Prise ilia.

Nomentana, Porta, 38
Noinentana, Via, 4, 5, 38-84
Nomentano, Ponte, 45

Quarries

of travertine, 12^ sqq.

Querini, Vigna, 87

P 2

or,

70

di),

212

Index.

Querqnetulani, 138
Qitintilius Varus, Villa

Rava

154 sqq., 208

47

Regillum, 83
Kegina, Lago della, no, 117 sqq.
Regresso, 190, 191
Regtdus, Villa
S. Restitutus,

of, 97,

of,

Tiburtina, Via, \sqq., 84-197


Tiutillo, Colle, 77 sqq.

70

Rimnne, 29

Tivoli, see

Tor
Tor

Rondanini, Vigna, 87
Rosolina, La, 189
Rosso, Casale, 112

Tibur

S. Giovanni, Casale,
S.

Giovanni, Via

di,

Torre dei Sordi, Casale,

50
50

n6

Torrione, 136
Tosse, Tempio della, 148 sqq.

Rotavelle, 81 sqq.

Tre Madonne, Vicolo

Rnbelln, Villa of the, 190


Rufini, Vigna, 43

delle, 9

Sacer vtons, 46

Treponli, 74
Truglia, 163
Truglio, 126

Salaria, Porta, 11

Turrita, Colle, 172, 173

Salaria Veins, Via, 9 sqq.

Valeria,

Salaria, Via, 4, 5, 7-38


Salario, Ponte, 16

n.''

Via, 85

Vallemara, 185
Valle Oscura, 57

Sassula, 134, 173


Savini, Vigna, 94

Valvisciolo, 79
di,

Vazoletto, Fosso, 176, 178, 180

104

Veneziano, Colle, 81
Ventidius Bassus, Villa

Scaptia, 139, 140

Scarpellata, 175
Scocciasanta, 173, 174
Segnale Muro di Cinta, 202

Verano, Campo, 89

164, 165

sqq.

Vergata, Torre, 56, 102

Serena, 142
Serpentara, Torre, 17
Sette Bagni, Casale di, 23
Settecamini, Osteria dei, 103, 104,
Sinibaldi, Casale, 180, 181

Spada, Villa {=Fidenae), 17

of,

Venturi, Vigna, 89, 91

Selciata, Colle, 179

Vibii Vari, Villa of the, 143 sqq.

Vicus Novus

(=

Ad

Novas

Osteria Nuova),

8,38

in

sqq.

Spiritc Santo, Casale, 148

Stazzano, 83
S. Slefano, Colle,

Cappellone)^

Tibur, 5 sqq., 84, 109, 162, 185

Ripoli, Colle, 190

Scalzacane, Grotte

= 11

Tibiirtina, Porta, 85 sqq.

119

Cemetery

"4
Tartari, Lago dei, 106, 116
Tavernucole, Osteria delle, n4
Tesoro, Colle del, 171

Roscia, 79

Redicicoli, Torre,

Syinpkorosa, Church of

S.
of,

143 sqq.

S. Stefano (near Montecelio), iSl sqq.

Strada Vecchia di Montecelio, 104 sqq.


Strada Vecchia di Palombara, 54 sqq., 99, 187

Vigne Nuove, Via

delle,

46

Viminalis, Porta, 85 sqq., 199, 200


Vincenzo, S., Church of, 180
Virgo, Aqua, 9 n."'', 44, 96
Vitriano, 152, 155, 164, 165, 169^,7.
Vittorie, Casale delle, 54
S. Vittorino,

131

Vopjscus, Villa

Zenobia, Villa

of,

of^

164

ng, 128

PAPERS OF THE BRITISH SCHOOL AT ROME


Vol.

III.

No.

NOTES ON

ROMAN HISTORICAL SCULPTURES


BY
H.

STUART JONES,

M.A.

Formerly Director oj the British School at Rome, ajtd Fellow 'and Tutor of Trinity
College, Oxford; Member of the Gentian Imperial Archaeological Institute.

LONDON:

1905

NOTES ON ROMAN HISTORICAL SCULPTURES.


The Basreliefs

I.

the Villa Borghese, attributed to

in

THE Arch of Claudius.

I.

That the

three historical

ground

seems

to

from

by Helbig

in

in

commemoration of

title

in

Arch of Claudius

the

his guide to the

no foundation, save

its

Roman

is

and

Roman

filled

by

reliefs
^

their

question

and has been assumed

art.^

Nevertheless

work published

in 1832.

The

reliefs

it

has

Villa had been

less

when some

found their way to Paris, and now form no

inconsiderable portion of the sculptures of the Louvre

were partly

The

without

affirmed

collections,-

principal treasures during the Napoleonic period

scores of statues

the

a conjecture of Nibby, contained in his Monunie?zti

in

Villa Borghese, a

stripped of

in

conquest of

Brunn-Bruckmann's Denkmdler

in all recent discussions of the history of

scelti della

his

be the accepted belief at the present time.

are published under this


provetiaiice

immured

once belonged to a

to the left of the entrance,

triumphal arch erected by Claudius


Britain,

of which two are

the portico of the Villa Borghese, while the

north and south walls of


third rests on the

reliefs,

and their

places

important works gathered from the gardens of the

It was thus that the


employed in the decoration of the portico
up till that time they had, as it would appear, lain neglected and scarcely
Nibby, however, brought them to
noticed ^ in the gardens of the Villa.^

Villa and from the other properties of the Borghese.


reliefs in

question

came

to be

No. 403, from which PI. XX. Fig. i is taken.


No. 939-941, p. 122 f. (Ed. 2).
^ E.g. by Wickhoff, Roman Art (Eng. trans.), p. 74 ff., and Courbaud, Le basrelicf roniain h
representations historiques, p. 1 17 f. (who notices the view of Winckehnann, to be referred to later,
^

"^

only to reject

it).

Save by Winckelmann (v. infra).


^ Winckelmann speaks of them as works
die in der Villa Borghese liegen^ and Nibby (in the
passage quoted above) says, t>er litngo temio riinasero negktti nel giardino vecchioJ' They do not
*

'

'

The

2i6

British School at Rome.

high honour, reproducing the larger rehefs on Plates

and describing them under the Nos. 4 and 13 of


will
be found the passage relating to their
reciting Vacca's account of the
in

v.

of his work,

On

catalogue.

his

supposed

excavations of 1562

Morto

venduti

donati da Ginliano

papa Gregorio XV.,

altri

II.,

liii

light,

raccolti furono in

gran parte

da

per

cut OR?>^ dopo il

I594

Casa Borghese!

esso in

be seen at a glance that Nibby's statement rests upon

will

and

as follows

sua figlio, altri al Card. Ludovisi, nipote dt

Card. Farnese,

al

passarono al Card. Aldobrandini


It

da

14

Piazza Sciarra,

in

Giovanni Giorgio Cesarini, Nibby proceeds

Gio. Giorgio nel 1585, gli oggetti


e

p.

After

origin.

which fragments of the Arch of Claudius were brought to

were sold to
'

and

i.

no

external evidence whatsoever, except the identification of the Emperor's


features as those of Claudius.

His circumstantial account of the successive


qualified

by the

which appears to have escaped the attention of recent

writers,

changes of ownership, through which the

word

forse,

Roms

although the authors of the Beschreibung

passed,

reliefs

is

(writing in 1842) were well

Notwith-

aware that the identification rested on Nibby's conjecture.^


standing, the conjectural attribution soon

and since the time of

ance,

of

Roman

who

won

Assuming

it

has not been called

that the reliefs in

way

its

to general accept-

treated of the reliefs in his study

Historical Sculpture, published in

dell Istituto for 1875,^

2,

Philippi,

1872,-

and

the Annali

in

in question.

question belong to

reign of

the

we are obliged to find a place for them in the history of Roman


sculpture, midway between the frieze of the Ara Pacis Augustae and the
reliefs of the Arch of Titus.
But their style does not permit us to regard
them as intermediate between the monuments above named in any process
Claudius,

of orderly development.

Philippi,

whose publication brought the

into the foreground of interest, speaks of their


'

archaic severity of style,' and says that

'

poor workmanship

'

numerous

errors

in

reliefs
'

and

drawing and

be mentioned in the descriptions of the Villa by Manilli ( Villa Borghese


descritta
Borghese [1700]).
Visconti (1796) described only the monuments
( ^27/(3
contained in the main building.

seem

to

[1650]) and Montelatici

Urlichs (Besckr.

reliefs in Villa

Roms

Borghese

'

iii.

3, p.

sollen daher

91) in treating of the

genommen worden

clearly that the identification of the features of Claudius


'

'

Ueber die romischen Triumphalreliefs

schaften, xvi. 247


3

Pp. 42

ft".

ff. ).

'

is

Arch of Claudius merely says

sein

'

but Plainer (ibid.

p.

that the

231) explains

the sole base of the conjecture.

{Abhandliingen der

k. sacks. Gesellschaft

der Wissen-

Notes on Roman Historical Sculptures.

217

the confusion and misunderstanding shewn in the treatment of the draper}-

of the principal figure on Plate


lower

level

artistic

Titus.'

The

disjecta

prove that we have to do with a

tar

by the creator of the reliefs of


Pacis had not at that time been
Ara
membra of the
that occupied

than

and assigned

identified

Wickhoff, writing after this

to their true orign,

discovery, sees in the reliefs an effort to surpass the

obtain the pictorial effect of depth by

Ara

Pacis,

and

to

placing two rows of profiles in

relief above the figures of the foreground, but admits that the experiment, 'one of those Italian attempts to combine the pictorial and plastic
styles,' was a complete failure, ov/ing principally to the clumsiness of the

low

'

sculptor,

who

contribute

could not even have cut an eye in profile correctly,

anything

to

new departure

in style.'

still

Courbaud,

less

too,

is

constrained to speak of the artist as losing the ground already gained by


historical basrelief, of a

'

retrograde movement,' and of the

Thus no

awkwardness of a beginner.'

effort

is

'

failures

and

made to shew
Ara Pacis and

or can be

into their natural place between the


and we are thrown back on the supposition that they
represent the rude experiments of an Italian sculptor who has broken with

that the reliefs

Arch of

the

fall

Titus,

Hellenistic tradition.

shewn that Nibby's conjecture neither


possesses inherent probability nor is supported by external evidence
^

3. It can, however,

while, on the other

certainty to the

be

hand, a

reliefs,

pedigree can be assigned

which excludes the

with

possibility of their

practical

connexion

with the Arch of Claudius, and points to a widely different origin.

Nibby

starts

from the fact

that,

according to the statement of Flaminio


of Claudius, discovered under the

Vacca,^ the fragments of the Arch

Pontificate of Pius IV, were bought


transferred

to

his

gardens

were the home of one of the


the sixteenth century.^

It

near S.

by Giovanni Giorgio Cesarini, and


These gardens
Pietro in Vincoli.

finest collections of ancient

marbles made

had been formed by Giuliano Cesarini,

died in 1564, and by his son Giovanni Giorgio,

who married

in

who

Clelia Farnese,

At
natural daughter of Cardinal Alessandro Farnese, and died in 1585.
the time of Montaigne's visit to Rome, in 1580, it was still one of the
Mem.

28 {v. infra).
also Geffroy in Mdanges de
See Lanciani, Sioria degli Scavi, i. 133 ff.
165', and Adinolfi, Rovia ttel medio evo, ii. 104 ff.
*

V Ecole francaise,

x.

The

2i8

British School at Rome.


Unfortunately,

principal sights of the city.

collection/ and the engravers of the time

attention.

copy of

the will

we have no

seem

of Giovanni Giorgio Cesarini

we

Archivio di Stato at Rome,- from which

the

destined

his

collection

and division being

alienation

complete inventory of
for the testator's son,

strictly prohibited,^

its items.'*

Giuliano

1 1,

it

but

little

preserved in

is

that the testator

learn

from heir to heir by primogeniture,

pass

to

description of the

have paid

to

and proposed

The passage has almost


created Duca by Sixtus

to

make

a pathetic interest,

V, was an incorrig-

and mmtvais sujet, and, after dispersing almost the whole of


became an outlaw. A miserable remnant of its treasures was

ible spendthrift

the collection,

Aldrovandi

221) briefly mentions some statues, etc., in the palace, not the gardens, of the

(p.

Cesarini.

Archivio del Collegia dei Notari, No.

antiken Bildwerke der Villa Ludovisi,


^

transcribe the passage from the copy referred to, giving

della famiglia Sforza,

291

ii.

Ratti says that the will

f.

the acts of the notary Paccichelli.


as the sixteenth century

now

1573 (no longer 1562, as given by Schreiber, Die

p. 6").

is

it

more

fully

than Ratti, Storia

dated July 23, 1574, and

is

contained in

cannot find that any members of that family practised as early

the papers of the office, which afterwards passed through their hands, are

I have not been able to search them.


The instrument of
which a copy is preserved in the Archivio di Stato is dated Dec. 18, 1581 (with a codicil of Apr. 7,
The passage in question runs as follows
1585), and was drawn up by the notary Curzio Saccocci.
(f. 322 v.)
et perche nella eredita di jnio padre ho ritrovato il Giardino di San Pietro in Vincola

Archivio Distrettuale, and

in the

'

con il palazzo vecchio senza niobili tdensili et taravienti et havendolo

paramenti

teste

io

aobbato et ornato di molti

di marino statue colonne tavole coinmesse di varie sorte, diverse altre sorte di inartno

bronzi antichi caviei intaglii di goie pittitre quadri et molte altre cose a ornamento del palazzo che
tiitto

et

ser}-anno inventariate in tin libra, et havendo io similmente delta giardino ampliata di altri siti

nave fabriche

che io

et

dessiderando

tengo, il che

Io

nan

io

che detto luogo sia teniito et conservato con quelle sopra dette deliiie

si pub fare che

nan con

spese notabili et volendo provedere

che detto luogo con suoi edificii vechii et novi fatti et da farsi et

sempre indivisi,
parte etiam

et (fol.

minima

323

r. )

non

si

ttctte le

come

fniglio posso,

altre cose sopradette restino

possano mai per alctin tempo sino a inpinito ne in tutto ne in


prima genito per haver maggiore entrata serrH

aliena7-e, et cognoscendo, che il

till atto a conservarlo nel debito ?)iodo, ordino voglio comando et lasso che il detto primo genito solo et
insolidum succeda in detto giardino edificii antichi et novi terreni et altre cose contigue che ho
comprati sin qui et compraro sino al tempo della morte mia, marmi statue diverse cose di marmo

bronzi cainei intaglii diversi pitture paramente

et altre robbe

descritte in detto ijtvejitario quale Jinito che serrci spero

rogarh del presente testamento

altri notari

dar

che sono et serranno in detto luogo et

sotto scritto

persone a chi piii

vero inventario come di sopra non si travasse da 7ne consignato


di pai la morte
et detto

mia

se

et

di

man mia

et altre robbe di

al notaro che si

piacera, et quando detto libra o

detto notaro

altri voglio che Subito

ne faccia inventario distinta7nente di cosa per cosa di tutte

giardino palazzo

indivisi

at.

mi

le

sopradette robbe,

sopra narrati voglio che perpetuamente siano conservati

vadano da primogenito in trimogenito di tutti

i detti

miei descendenti,

etc. (provisions,

against alienation follow).


*

This inventory, which would,

research,

was

preserved, have been of the highest value for njuseographic


made, seems irretrievably lost, though it might possibly be
Archives of Casa Sforza-Cesarini.
(The houses of Sforza and Cesarini became

either never

discovered in the^

made

if

or, if

merged by the marriage of Donna Livia Cesarini (1646-1711), great-granddaughter of Giuliano II


and heiress of the house, to Duca Federico Sforza.

Notes on Roman Historical Sculptures.


sold to Cardinal Ludovisi in 1622.^

It is

219

probable that the principal part

of the collection passed to the Farnese, with

whom

Giuliano was connected

by Vacca," writing in 1594, for


the eighteen busts discovered in a vineyard behind the Baths of Diocletian
and bought by Giovanni Giorgio Cesarini for 700 scudi, ed ova il Sig.
Giuliano le ha vendute al Cardinal Farnese e sono nella sua Galleria' ^ and is
through his mother.

The

fact

attested

is

'

likewise proved for two statues, both of which have

now found

Naples as part of the Farnese


century engravers as existing

the Cesarini gardens.*

in

their

way

to

were figured by sixteenth-

collection, but

mentioned by Vacca had thus become the


property of the Farnese, we should expect to find them, if anywhere, in
Nibby, however, conjectures that they may have
the Museum at Naples.
however, the

If,

reliefs

passed from the Farnese (after the death of Cardinal Alessandroin 1594) to
the Aldobrandini, to which family the reigning pope Clement VIII (15921605) belonged, and thus (through the well-known marriage connexions
of the Aldobrandini) into the possession of the Borghese, who provided an

almost immediate successor to Clement VIII


(1605-1623).

It

was under

in

the person of Paul

his pontificate that the Villa

was

by

built

his

But the supposition of Nibby is


I
am unable to find any evidence that either the
entirely gratuitous.
Aldobrandini or the Borghese collections were enriched at the expense
of that of the Farnese, and we must regard the suggestion as highly
brother. Cardinal Scipione Borghese.

improbable
I 4.

in itself.

The probability of

Nibby's attribution

what we know of the Arch of Claudius and the


have from time to time taken place

in

is in

result

no way increased by
of excavations which

Piazza Sciarra.

Of

these

it

be

will

convenient here to give a brief summary.


1

The inventory

is

printed by Schreiber,

Mem. 104.
The find is mentioned by

Die antiken Bildwerke der

Ligorio {Taiir.

xxiii. fol. 63),

Villa Ludovisi,

who names

p.

25

f.

thirteen of the busts.

Three have with greater or less probability been identified with works now in Naples (Hiilsen,
Die Hermenbildnisse heruhmter Griechen {Rom. Mitth. 1901, p. 123 ff.], Nos. 21 (Carneades), 24
by Gallaeus as
I should be inclined to add No. 9 (Euripides), described
(Lysias), 38 (Posidonius).
belonging to the Farnese, and

(i)

De

now

in edibus nobilis

at Naples.

Antiquarum
Romani in regione

Cavalleriis,

93 (Oceani

Romae

Stattiarjim Urbis

Romae,

platee de Sciarra)

= Vaccaria, Antiquarum S'atuarum

i/ii.

PI.

effigies

Urbis

Cesarinorum) = Reinach, i. 434, 5; (ii) Vaccaria, op. cit. PI. 30


(Bacchi statua in viridario Cesarinorum) [the engraving and legend were appropriated by the
De Rossi firm in the seventeenth century] = Reinach i. 397, 6.

Romae

icones, PI.

30

(in viridario


The

220
I.

The

British School at Rome.

known

excavation

first

to

have taken place on the

recorded by Vacca,^ whose account runs as follows

\La

piazza di Sczarra)

frammenti deW

Vi fiirono trovati al tempo di Pio

che furono comprati dal Sig. Gio. Giorgio Cesarino

furono cento trentasei

Vimbasamento di

lo comprai

Vincoli.

Tutta

carretate.

l"

una facciata

ed oggi

il resto

si trovano net

frammenti

di detti

opera era di

marmi

gentili ;

saligno.

Pochi anni sono vi era sopra terra in opera

'

IV del

arco di Claiidio e molti pezzi d'istorie col ritratto di Claudio,

suo giardino a S. Pietro in

solo

site is that

Romani

del' arco, e fit levata da'

iin

pezzo d'istoria, quale era

inurata nel piano delle scale

che saliscono su la sala del Campidoglio'

necessary to observe that the relief mentioned by Vacca in the

It is

second paragraph was, as the words


forming, in

sort of reason for connecting

Lanciani.-

Sciarrae

in opera indicate,

part of the wall of a house

fact,

As he

it

donius

in

therefore no

is

it is

is

done by

identical with the relief in platea

D"* Antonini Ciocii primi

III'"''

acquired by the Conservator!

in construction,

with the Arch of Claudius, as

himself has shewn,^

in pariete

used

and there

coss.

affixa,

1573 on consideration of the payment of

100 scudi and the execution of the necessary repairs to the wall

in

order to

complete the decoration of the loviuin scalarum Palatii, together with the
three reliefs from S. Martina on which M. Aurelius

is

although Petersen
reliefs

thought

it

possible that

from an arch of that Emperor,

believing

with

Hadrian.

At

Helbig that the style


all

events,

its

it

might belong to the

am

but

*
;

series of

not able to share his view,

points

workmanship

The

represented.

head of the Emperor has been restored as that of M. Aurelius

rather

to

the

period

forbids us to attribute

it,

of

with

Lanciani, to the time of Claudius.

The same excavation brought

to light various fragments of inscriptions,

whereof one alone survives to the present day. The find included three
fragments of the main inscription of the Arch of Claudius {C.l.L. vi. 920),
known to us only from the copies made by Nicolao Fiorentino and sent
by him to Torrentius and Pighius, and three fragmentary inscriptions in

honour of various members of Claudius's family {C.l.L. vi. 921 a-c), of


which several other copies besides those of Nicolao Fiorentino are extant.
1

Met>{. 28.

Storia degli Scavi,

a
ii.

83.
*

Bull.

Comm.

1878, p. 16

f.

See Helbig, Fiihrer^, No. 562,

Rom. Mitth.

1890, 75.

p. 378.

Notes on Roman Historical Sculptures.


Manutius gives the precise year of the excavation,
piazza di Sciarra fit
iscrittioni.

We
reliefs

riti'ovato

nn arco di

Claiidio imp.

from the MS. of Cittadini that these fragments

were

bought by the Cesarini, but kept

Pesaro MS.) that they were to be seen

On

hands

where

it

us (in the

tells

disappears entirely,

of

publication

way

its

to the Villa

was seen by Bianchini and Montfaucon, and has been

Museum

Capitoline

the

one

Stefano Longhi (in Doni's time), found

Giustiniani,
in

the

their

the gardens at S. Pietro in

in

the collection

of

dispersal

in

heard of at Naples, while the third, after passing through the

is

of

the

like

some time

for

However, Ciacconius

palace near the Church of the Gesu.

another

anno 1562 con queste

learn

Vincoli.

the words nella

in

I'

221

at

least

Capitoline

the

since

1750, the

inscriptions.^

date of Guasco's

was

It

no

doubt

the

discovery of this epigraphic material as well as the identification, whether


real or

supposed, of the portrait of Claudius which

the scholars

led

1562 to assign the sculptures to an arch of that Emperor

remembered
in

also that an arch

times then
It

recent.'"^

discovered in
in

inxta plateam Sciarrae' had been destroyed

probable that the three fragments of sculpture drawn by Pierre

is

Jacques^ and seen by him


dent

1562.

Rome

in

the Piazza Sciarra belonged to the reliefs

Pierre Jacques,

it

The

first

frieze

combat between Romans and barbarians

On

head.

head of a

the second (Reinach,

seems to have been


in

(Reinach,

dy Sciarra, 1576) represents a

in piace

true,

is

572-1 577; but the fragments

been acquired by the Cesarini.

griffin's

of

they doubtless

PI.

29

is

The two heads

are

resi-

not have

is

sculptured a

an architrave and a

30; Sciara, 1577)

siptifer, decorated as usual with a lion's muzzle,

third (Reinach, PI. 63

may

with the legend

on which

below

PI.

question

is

seen the

and bearded.

Sciara) represents the laureated head of a tnbicen.

drawn on a much

larger scale than the frieze

and

it is

not improbable that they belonged to figures which once occupied large
panels.
wrong in saying {Bull. Comm. I.e.) that all the inscriptions are now in
and he falls into a still graver error when he quotes Smetius and Manutius
as stating that the relief purchased by the Conservatori vi3.s found in Piazza Sciarra {Storia degli
They refer to the inscriptions only. He proceeds to quote Vacca's words (v. supra),
Scavi, ii. 83).
1

Lanciani

the Capitoline

is

therefore

Museum

omitting the essential phrase 'in opera.'


-

See the statement of Andrea Fulvio {Antiqiiitates Urbis Romae [1527],

an additional note at the end of this paper.


^

Reinach,

V Album de Pierre Jacques,

Pis. 29, 30, 63.

iv.

p.

60) quoted in

The

222

British School at Rome.

Girolamo Ferrucci

II.

Italian translation of the Antiquitates of

in his

Andrea Fnlvio (published in 1588) speaks of having s&cn pietroni di marmo,


a pilaster of /i?/^rz>i^, and some granite columns belonging to the same arch
and discovered

Piazza Sciarra.

in

now to
Barberini came to

In 1641 the largest fragment of the inscription of the arch

III.

be seen immured

the garden wall of the Palazzo

in

The excavation

light.

is

recorded by Martinelli,^ by Giacinto Gigli

Memorie^- and by Cassiano dal Pozzo

Dal Pozzo

his

in

MS. diary now

at Naples.^

the Via del Caravita (which leads from Piazza

when

states that

in his

Sciarra towards S. Ignazio and the Pantheon) was opened up there were
diversi, attinenti forse

found pezzi di bassorilievo


fnora, non pero

a qicalche arco

and that not many months

tiitto,

cavati

was

after the inscription

Further excavations were then prosecuted by the Conservatori

found.

Urban VIII, but suspended because the Pope reserved

the instance of

himself the

lion's

share of the finds, as Gigli

Pozzo says, there came to

these, as Cassiano dal

and

for

in the course of

light aliri pezzi di basso-

trovavano per prima.

rilievo coiupagni di quelli die si

seems to have been

us

tells

at

All trace of these

lost.

IV. Cipriani, in his Relazione delle Chiaviche (XXVIII.)


finding of part of a

column on the same

describes the

This was taken to the

site.

Palazzo Barberini.
In

V.

1869, during the laying of the

occupied by the Cassa

came

to

An

light.

di

of the

p. I22f.

Risparmio, further fragments of the sculptures

225

p.

From

f.,

and also by Pellegrini

these accounts

it

Strange as

became
dead

may

and a youthful head, on the smaller

seem,

many

for

of the

Roma

years,

it is

unknown

On

the larger

a rider.

at the present time

what

architect

me

bank) informs

that

the

fragments are not

in

the

ricercala uei suo sito [Ed. 1662], loS.

Roma

antica net 1838,

Nibby,

'

Lumbroso, Cassiano dal Pozzo,

Ap.
Ap.
* Ap.
Alexander

quite

The

same

and contractor have both been


and the Marchese Cavalletti-Rondinini (managing

of these fragments.

director
1

it

the

in

in the

appears that the finds

included fragments of sculpture on two different scales.


scale were a booted leg

premises

account of these was given by Lanciani

BuUetino delF Istituto for 1869,


periodical for 1870,

foundations

Fea, Miscellanea,

VII. (1655-1667).

ii.

i.

441.
p.

52.

252:=Schreiber, Sachs. Berichte, 1885, 146.

It is

addressed to

Notes on Roman Historical Sculptures.


Risparmio, nor

of the Cassa di

possession

is

223

there any record of their

disposal.

would appear, then, that of the fragments found in the Piazza di


Sciarra at various periods there are none whose present whereabouts can be
It

traced

nor does

seem that any reproductions of them are in existence


It is worthy of note

it

with the exception of the drawings of Pierre Jacques.^

that in the case of these drawings, as in that of the finds of 1869,

it

seemed

I
should be
two scales were represented.
which
Claudius,shews
an arch
coin
of
that
on
the
suggest
disposed to
erected in commemoration of the Britannic triumph, the frieze to which

possible that sculptures on

Pierre

Jacques'

first

drawing and the rider found

may have

indicated, while the larger fragments

in

1869 belonged

is

belonged to the groups

decorating the passage-way.


I 5.

On the other hand, the pedigree of the Borghese

believe,

reliefs can, as

be determined with practical certainty.

Writers of the early sixteenth century describe the church ofS. Martina,

which occupied the

site

of the Secretarium Senatus, as containing a

of inscriptions and basreliefs immured


1509, says:

'm

qua

nndiqiie exornati sunt'

Urbis.^wxXXX&n in 15

The church was


treasures.

We

13,

not,

Albertini,^ writing in

in its walls.

matmoreis antiquae caelaturae parietes

ecclesia tabidis
;

and Andrea Fulvio


speaks of the

'

in his

Latin poem, Antiqnaria

mat-moreae species

is

shall deal later with the case of the reliefs representing the

vi crano due grandi istorie di

consiunate, 7'appresentanti

V^ nel far

Sisto

annati con

What

in 1524.

that Vacca^ gives us the following information

di S. Martina

mano.

signa triumpJii!

et

however, destined to retain the possession of these

triumph of M. Aurelius, acquired by the Conservatori


concerns us

number

inarmo

'

here

Nella chiesa

statnale,

assai

trofei in inano e alcimi togati di biiona

sua cappella nella chiesa di S. Maria Maggiore

la

ed in ricompensa donb

devioli la chiesa di S. Liica de pittori,

delta chiesa di S. Martina, ed essi per farvi

a'

niedesimi la

miglioramenti venderono dette

Htilsen suggested (Rom. Mitth. 1891, 79) that some of the drawings of Panvinius in Coa.
3439 might reproduce the fragments discovered in 1562 but I have not found any indication

J'at.

MS. and do

of such provenance in the

degree of probabiHty to
-

Cohen,

49=

PI.

not believe that any of the drawings can be traced with any

this source.

XXIX.

4.

The legend tr'P'imp' proves nothing

as to date;

unfortu-

nately the faint indications of reliefs are lost in the reproduction.


*

Fol. 27.

In 1588, see Nibby,

title S.

Martina e

S.

Fol. O.

Luca.

iii.

b.

Roma tuodema

tiel

Mg^^

1838,

i.

58.

539.

The church has

since then borne the


The

224
istorie,

The

British School at Rome.

che al presented sono in casa del sig. Cavaliere delta Porta scultore^

must have taken taken place very shortly before Vacca wrote,

sale

as Lanciani-

The

shews, the Conservator! meditated the acquisition

question

reliefs in

for,

of the

in 1592.

sculptor to

whom Vacca

refers

is

Giambattista della Porta,

formed a considerable collection of ancient marbles, which on

his

who

death

in

1597 he bequeathed to his co-heirs Gianpaoloand Tommaso della Porta. The


former of these survived, and, having no interest in antiquities, sold the
collection,

which realised only 6,000

from a MS. formerly

in the

scudi.^

In 1893, Graeven published,*

Barberini library and

now

in

the Vatican, an

inventory of this collection, and shewed (with the aid of Michaelis) that

all

the works described with sufficient detail to admit of identification can be

traced to the Borghese collections, and are

now

either in the Villa Borghese

or have been transferred thence to the Louvre, except


in the

some which remained

Palazzo Borghese until the sale which took place

in

The

1893.

vagueness of the descriptions does not permit of certainty save in a limited

number of

cases, but there are several statues

Louvre which might well be

now

in

the Villa or in the

identical with those in the inventory, over

and

above those which Graeven and Michaelis have been able to identify, and
there seems to be very

was purchased en

longa

p. 20.'

good reason

for the

adornment of

his

newly

the head of this inventory stands the following item

istoria del trionfo di


It

to believe that the'della Porta collection

by Cardinal Borghese

Now at

erected Villa.

Prima ima

bloc

Germanico con molte figure

did not escape the notice of Graeven that

reference to the reliefs from S. Martina sold


to Giambattista della Porta,

alta p. \o et

we have

here a

by the Accademia di S. Luca


the two large reliefs

who no doubt recomposed

and the smaller fragment (not noticed by Vacca) with the restorations
necessary to form a connected frieze, treating them in the same way as the
fragments of the frieze of the Ara Pacis were handled before being fixed
in

the

walls of the Villa Medici

i.e.

completing the composition with

extensive additions in plaster.


1594-

'

pubblico held Sept. 22,


ii. 92
., quoting the minutes of the Consiglio
Exposito per primum Conservato7-etn (Andreatn VelHwn] in ecclesia Satictae Martinae in foro
1592
Boario adesse diias tabiilas marmoreas sculptas et triuinphum Marci Aurelii forsan concomitantes,
quas expedit poptilo habere decretum est quod Conservatores curent illas habere cum poptdi }?iaiori
2

Storiadegli Scavt,

'

utilitate.^
*

See Baglioni, Vite

Rom. Mitth. 1893,

de' pittori, etc., pp. 74,


p.

236

ft.

152 (ist ed.).

Notes on Roman Historical Sculptures.


But Graeven has not noticed^

Nibby was regarded

no

as authoritative

225

doubt because the statement of

that

Germanico

trionfo di

this

is

clearly to be identified with the Borghese reliefs hitherto assigned to the

The

Arch of Claudius.
the

height (10 palms

= 2-23

m.) tallies with that of

and although the length

question,^

in

reliefs

greater than that

is

obtained by adding together the breadths of the three fragments, the


difference

when allowance

easily accounted for

is

made

is

for the plaster

whose existence we are obliged to assume. When the reconfrieze was removed from the della Porta collection to that of the

restorations
stituted

Borghese, these restorations were no doubt broken up and the original

marbles alone preserved.

6,

It

remains to be considered to what date the

the Borghese reliefs point.

It

stylistic affinities

was shewn above that those

of

who,

critics

believing that external evidence compelled their assignment to the reign of

Claudius, endeavoured to determine their place

Roman

historical sculpture,

stepping-stone

tracing

in

Augustae to the
therefore in

found
the

sculptures

course
of the

any case be disposed

the Julio-Claudian

portion of this frieze, as

decoration of his arch.


tinuous), of

is

series

point

in

refer

Forum

Ara Pacis
should

of

fact

they

into their

fall

of Trajan, which

victories

of that Emperor.

of

in

attic
reliefs.

Nor

The Louvre

and arm of a Dacian, and

the western side of the attic of the

in

the

are these the only

possesses

in

relief,

Roman

may

reliefs

be seen on

This beyond

of the Arch

height of fr. A is (in. 2'io ni., of fr. B cin. 2 30 ni.


Catalogue sommaire, No. 412 photogr. Giraudon, 1078 (whence Fig.

and the

The

here

the background one of

Arch of Constantine.

doubt belongs to the same monument as the

all

the passage-way, while the other two

of the Arch.

the characteristic wattled huts of which another example

'

in

considerable

reproduced,- on which are seen the head and part of the figure of a
legionary, the head

not

monuments whose provenance


to the disjecta membra of the

known, was used by Constantine

well

which two were used

this

We

period.

This was broken up into four parts (once con-

form the side-panels of the


remains of

Flavian

Dacian

probability once decorated the

a stumbling-block rather than a

of evolution from the

a group of

and period are beyond question.


great frieze representing the

the development of

in

to attribute the reliefs to the period of

But

dynasty.

when compared with

natural place

them

in

i).

226

Till-:

same may be

Bki'iish

School at Rome.

said of the relief walled into the garden front of the Villa

Medici,^ which represents a Dacian

background

appears

familiar from the

the

reliefs

swimming
constructed

bridge

the Danube, while in the

by Trajan's orders

and

of the Column.

one time formed part of the same frieze is,


The dimensions of
indeed, incapable of proof and perhaps improbable.

That the Borghese

reliefs at

Fu;.

I.

the figures and the height of the relief probably differed but
In the reliefs of the Villa Borghese, as in

them, the figures are considerably over

those with which

life-size,

drill in

It

is

to

be noted,

the representation of accessories such

as the ornamentation of the helmet,


1

little if at all.

have compared

the length of the face from

hair to chin being almost exactly 20 cm. throughout.

however, that the use of the

which

Mat7.-I)uhn, 351S.

may

plainly be seen in the

Notes on Roman Historical Sculptures.


fragment and

Louvre

Constantine,

although

is

absent

there

are

is

in

found

also

in

the

the case of the Borghese

portions of the great frieze

am

from the Arch of

reliefs

reliefs.

differences in execution even

227

For

this reason

between the various

inclined to think that the Borghese

There can, however, be no


panels belonged to a different composition.
doubt whatever that their style and spirit are the same, and it is in my
It
opinion highly probable that they once adorned the Forum of Trajan.
has been generally believed that this

Arch of Constantine, and

the

is

the provenance of the reliefs from

in the case of

our panels this

we were

probable, since the church of S. Martina, to which

them, stood

is

still

more

able to trace

the immediate neighbourhood of the Imperial Fora.

in

The group of monuments to which reference has been made, together


with the Column of Trajan and the Arch of Beneventum,^ is marked by
very definite characteristics. At no other time was there a school of

Roman

sculpture so distinctively

Forum

architect of the

the friezes

It

is

no doubt true that the

of Trajan, Apollodorus of Damascus, was a Syrian

by no means clear that the conception and execution of


and reliefs which completed the decoration of the Forum are due

But

Greek.

in spirit.

it is

to the architect

who designed

the building.

The

traditions of historical

sculpture were unquestionably formed in the workshops of the capital, and


it

was

in these that the

gradual transformation took place by reason of

which Hellenistic conventions were in course of time discarded and new


canons took their place. I am unable to follow Petersen - in thinking that

Column are Greek in character. It may be true that


symmetry and balance often seen in the composition are a debt which
Roman craftsmen owed to their Hellenic forerunners although the

the reliefs of Trajan's


the

detailed comparison of the Fall of Sarmizegetusa with the 'Wiov irkpcri^ of

Polygnotus does not, to

dependence
reliefs are

at the

thinking, lead

v.'ork

to

case of the later composition

in the

the

my

of a school which endeavours to realise

expense of unlearning many of the lessons of Greek

no more characteristic detail

in

treatment of the eye


'

We may add
p.

34

in profile,

new aims even


There

art.

which

(as all critics

the fragments from Turin published in the

is

p.

95

is

exhibited than the

have noted)

Memoric

is

rendered

del Lincei, serie

ff.

Die Marcussciule,

of

which the identity of workmanship between

the Borghese reliefs and those of the Great Frieze

VIII.

convincing proof

but in their details the

f.

v.

vol.

The

228

British School at Rome.

according to the archaic convention en face, as though the true

way had

not been shewn by the Greek sculptors.^

The most noteworthy


substitute height for

feature of the Trajanic style

depth

in

perspective.

Thi.s

the practice in accordance with which the

is

its

is

attempt to

the true significance of

artist, finally

abandoning the

indeed had ceased to be a reasonable

isocephalism of Greek art (which

convention since the introduction of pictorial methods into relief-sculpture),

endeavours to give the effect of a serried mass of troops by disposing two,


even more rows of heads

three, or

The experiment

a vertical series.

in

by Wickhoff ^ but he has


not noticed that it is characteristic not merely of the Borghese reliefs, but
also of the Great Frieze from the Arch of Constantine and the Column of
no doubt deserves the

This convention,

Trajan.^

in fact, springs

Roman

of perspective which led


justly appreciated

upon

strictures passed

by Wickhoff

it

from the bird's-eye conception

sculptors from the spatial composition

in

the case of the

Arch of

Titus, to the

map-like projections of the Arch of Septimius Severus.^

There can thus be no doubt as


belong

the juxtaposition of the various

compared them
argument on
it

may

the period to which our reliefs

to

is

in itself conclusive,

details,

be well,

monuments with which we have

and

it

is

unnecessary to base the

which afford confirmation rather than

in conclusion, to recall

the fact that

But

proof.^

Winckelmann assigned

There are several examples on the panels of the Arch of Beneventum.


Roman Art (Eng. trans.), p. 76 f.
^ See esp. Cichorius, PI. XI. and LXXVII.
It is to be noted that the Arch of Beneventum in
this respect follows more closely the classical tradition, being in fact clearly inspired by the Arch of
Titus, which it resembles in design.
We see a trace of the Trajanic convention, however, in the
^

relief of the
^

passage-way, representing the foundation of the alimentary institutions.

Bird's-eye perspective

may

of course be freely illustrated from the reliefs of Trajan's

Column,

especially in the case of palisading.


^ Thus, the form of the helmet corresponds with that worn by the Romans on the lireat Frieze.
The ornamentation is variable, as in the case of the frieze, but xheftiluien on the cheekpiece is characteristic.
The crest is worn exactly as in the reliefs of the Archway (where in some cases the wheel
and aigrettes take its place), and, as is to be noted, in some scenes of the Column, including

those already quoted in illustration of the superposition of rows of


it

(sitpra,

n. 3),

where

legionaries are repre-

So
worn by the Nero

Again, the form of the cuirass with the tiarrow scarf forms a point of resemblance.

sented.
far as

at

heads

has been supposed with some probability that praetorians rather than

is

at present

known, the only

first-century cuirass with the scarf

Constantinople (Reinach, Repertoire,

ii.

Alexander, sometimes show the

e.g.

Roman

Imperial type in Asia Minor during the

we have

scarf,

and

first

this

earlier than

Trajan (von Rohden

in

Greek bronze

statuettes, repre-

transferred to the

century (the Nero was found at Thyatira)

a considerable series of j/(Z/(Zf loricatac ixoxn

no example

that

may perhaps have been

It is true that

577, 9).

senting

is

Rome and

Bonner Stndien,

Italy,
p. 5

f. ).

and they seem

Imt

to furnish


Notes on Roman Historical Sculptures.

229

them without hesitation to their true origin.^ The passage is worth quoting
Of pubhc works of art executed under Trajan there remain, besides the
:

'

fragments of his arch, from which Constantine caused his

fine

own

to be

constructed, fragments of large works in high rehef which He in the Villa

These appear

Borghese.
the

Emperor

as the

figures

triumphal arch of

either from a second

or from another public building belonging to his

Basilica

Ulpia, which

These

mentioned.

come

to

fine

Forum, such

represented on a rare gold coin already

is

their standards in

works represent soldiers with

palms high, amongst which we can distinguish but not recognize

the commander, whose head has been broken

The

off.

bust of Trajan

is,

on one of the rounB medallions on the

however, plainly to be seen

we

standards, while on another of these fragments

see on the standard

which bears two medallions, on the lower one the figure of Nerva, and on
the upper (apparently; that of Trajan a second time.'
follow

Winckelmann

in

recognizing

roitJi

though we are
(with Nibby) Claudius and Narcissus but the
Nerva and Trajan

as those of

still

cannot, indeed,
portraits

less able to see in

them

beardless heads, in which

was doubtless

no exact portraiture

We

certainty the medallion

attempted, accord

with the fashion

of Trajan's time, to which the founder of archaeological science rightly


attributed the

The Relief-Medallions of the Arch of Constantine.

II.

monument.

I.

It

has been recognized since the seventeenth century^ that the

sculptures which adorn the

monuments of an
to Gian Pietro

of

engravings

quae Rouiac

The

earlier date.

Bellori,

from

Francois Perrier

Arch of Constantine were

who

ancient

Bellori

reliefs

title

was

'

IVerkc (Donaueschingen edition),

Winckelmann strangely speaks of

dift'erenl

is

part taken from

due, in the

first

instance,

contributed the explanatory text to the series

under the

extant.''

observation

in

vi.

published

at

Icones et segmenta
at the time a

259

{.

Paris

in

veteruui

1645

by

tabutanun

young man, and the legends

-descliichte der

A'ttiisl, xi. 3, 31.

the two standards with medallion portraits as being on

fragments, "whereas they are in reality on the same

relief.

He no

doul.t wrote

from

memory.
>

scenes

From

Nos.

the sixteenth century


I.

-IV.

which

several cases with heard-.

I'lates

35-42.

we have Giovanni

Battista Mercati's engravings of four of the

are of no archaeological value.

The

figures are freely restored, in

in

British School at Rome.

The

230
question formed

his first contribution to archaeology,

inaugurating a

him

series of works covering half a century (he died in 1696), which entitle

Bellori did not

fail

membra decorate
the

sculptures of

Trajan

to recognize

in the

Great Frieze whose disjecta

concluded that

archway, and

central

the

Roman

band of writers on

to rank highly in the small

historical sculpture.

Arch which were obviously

all

those

than the time of

earlier

Constantine belonged to Trajan's reign, including the medallions and the


Perrier's engravings were executed without a mirror,
panels of the attic.

and thus reversed the direction of the originals (according to the common
practice of engravers in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries), and the
Plates and text were freely repro-

missing portions were freely restored.

duced according to the custom of the time. Thus, in 1680, Matteo Piccioni
published ^ a set of poor engravings, including the medallions and attic
panels of the Arch of Constantine, together with the four reliefs in the

Palazzo dei Conservatori on which Marcus Aurelius

were accompanied by

Bellori's text,

Bellori's

restored.

of

publication

arcus Augustonim, published in

Veteres

work were from the hand of Pietro Sante

regards direction, and in

is
is

alteration,

correctly

to be

found

in

The engravings
who no doubt had

for

Bartoli,

reproduced the originals correctly as

some few

cases restored the missing portions of

the reliefs with greater accuracy than his predecessor.^

shews some

more

Perrier's

but

him,

plates before

II.

reliefs

1690.^

his
this

Perrier's

No.

in

the

They

represented.

and mark no advance on

work, except that the figure of Silvanus


final

is

and the

figure of

Silvanus

is

Bellori's text also

for the first

time

correctly identified, having been previously interpreted as Hercules.


2.

Bellori's theory, that the reliefs in question

were

all

to be assigned

to the period of Trajan, remained practically unchallenged until the latter


that the

part of the nineteenth century,

when Prof Petersen demonstrated

panels of the attic belonged to

the time of Marcus Aurelius and originally

represented that Emperor.'*

Petersen devoted an article in the Romisc/ie

Mittheihiugen for 1889^ to the medallions, which were reproduced


^

in

the

With the enterprising firm of de Rossi (the name often appears in the Latin form de Rubds),
for more than a century the chief art-publishers of Rome and appropriated the work o

who were

most of the well-known engravers of the


2
*

which

E.g. the nimbus omitted by Perrier


it

Silvanus
^

later sixteenth century.

Plates 32-39.
is correctly given in three out of the four instances in
occurs (not, however, in No. IV.), and the attendant in the act of crowning the statue of
is

rightly restored.

See below,

p. 251,

with note.

P. 314

ff.

Notes on Roman Historical Sculptures.

231

Antike Denkmdler} with notes on technical details also from the pen of

Like

Petersen.

Emperor

all

whose

in

admitted that

it

was

considered that the

and could see

predecessors,

his

honour

Emperor

little

the

difficult to

he

held

were

reliefs

recognize

him

of Nos. VI. and

Trajan was the

that

executed, but

originally

He

extant figures.

in the

VHI. was

certainly not Trajan,

likeness to Trajan in the Imperial figure of No. VII.

Indeed, he recognized Trajan in one instance only,

viz.,

He

No. V.

further

admitted that none of the companions of the Emperor could be identified


with personages represented

on the

of Trajan's

reliefs

Thus

Column.

from the iconographic standpoint Petersen's results were negative and unsatisfying

how

the value of his study lay in the fact that he shewed clearly

the original grouping of the reliefs in pairs had been obscured by the

rearrangement to which Constantine's workmen had subjected them, and


suggested a possible restoration of the original arrangement

assumption that the original function of the

reliefs

had been

on the

to decorate

an arch.
3.

The

discussed

iconography and date of the

by Arndt

have recently been

reliefs

accompanies their publication,

the text which

in

based on Anderson's photographs (from which our plates are taken),

Arndt proposes

Bruckmann's Denkmdler.^

He

ten years of the reign of Hadrian.


bility in the figure

under the archway

rider of the boar-hunt (No. V.).

and became known

Now

resemblance to Hadrian

in

latter

I.,*

and with certainty

and

in

Emperor.

in

A.D., so that

Arndt

reliefs.

who

A.D.,

we thus

also sees a strong

occupies

the figure to the

honour of Trajan, perhaps

in the

no

Antinous was born about

Apollo (No. VI.), and suggests that the

up by Hadrian

set

No.

the bearded figure

position in the lion-hunt (No. VII.)


sacrifice to

to assign the reliefs to the last

recognizes Antinous with proba-

Hadrian about 128 or 129

to

a terminus pjst qiiem for the

obtain

in

in

reliefs

in

central

left in

the

may have been

the temple of the

In this case, however, the presence of Antinous would

anachronism
and Arndt is therefore disposed to
Emperor represented was originally Hadrian. He states
head of the Emperor is in no instance preserved, having been either

constitute a glaring

think that the


that the

replaced or worked over, as


'

'

I. PI. 42 f.
Nos. 555, 559, 560, 565.

in

the case of the scenes of sacrifice on the


Rom. Mitth.

Shewn

This figure was

in

1889, Pis.

vii, viii,

in point of fact bearded.

The

232

British School at Rome.

north face of the arch (Nos. VI. and VIII.).

by the

to be confirmed negatively

This conclusion he believes

fact that the subsidiary figures

cannot be

any of the comites of Trajan represented on the Column or


on the Arch of Beneventum, as well as positively by the style and
identified with

execution of the

The presence

reliefs.

of bearded figures and the plastic

rendering of the pupil he rightly admits to be inconclusive, but lays great


stress

on the 'restless' treatment of the

especially in the rendering of foliage.

hair,

He

and the

free use of the drill

recognizes, however, that the

countenances of the Emperor's companions are not always such as we


should expect

the time of Hadrian, and goes so far as to say that the

in

face of the personage to the right in the scene of the lion-hunt (No. VII.)
is

'

that of a Flavian in Hadrianic execution.'

Arndt's

study

is,

of course,

based

on

Anderson and the notes made by Petersen


executed

photographs

the

by

taken

when they were

at the time

but as the scaffolding erected on that occasion was necessarily

placed at some

little

distance from the reliefs for the purpose of focussing

the camera, a minute study of the details was impossible


further examination

justly observed, a

examination

resolved

to

undertake

and, as Arndt

Such an

was urgently needed.


order at

in

least

to

the

settle

question as to the restorations which the medallions had undergone in


later antiquity,

and

in

the hope that a final decision as to their date might

be rendered possible; and by the kind permission of


Director of the Ufficio Tecnico per
able, with the aid of a

been possible.

Petersen, Mr. T. Ashby, jun., and

4.

Mr. A.

was accompanied by
B.

J.

originally represented

case that the original head


it is

true that

is

in

was

Prof.

Wace, whose valuable

the south face

and

it

It is

(as stated

not the

by Arndt)

on the north face of the Arch the Imperial heads


in the

case of the medallions on

seems probable that no restoration took place

II.,

in antiquity.

indeed, not only the head but the upper portion of the

body of the Emperor


the original head

was Hadrian.

no instance preserved

have either been replaced or worked over,

I.

an examination was decisive against the theory of

Arndt that the Emperor

In Nos.

Angelis,

desire to acknowledge.

The result of

for while

Comm. de

Conservazione dei Monument!,

mechanical ladder, to make a closer study of the

originals than has hitherto

assistance

la

is

is

irretrievably lost

preserved, although

but

its

in

No. HI. (the bear-hunt)

features are

damaged beyond

Notes on Roman Historical Sculi'tukes.


recognition, while in No.

IV.

(the

.sacrifice

features have suffered too severely to permit of

any

and

it

is

beyond doubt

have been represented here.

beardless.

although the

certainty in the identi-

Emperor, the lower part of the face

fication of the

preserved

Artemi.s),

to

233

least

at

fairly well

is

Hadrian therefore cannot

was, moreover, entirely unable to see an}-

marked degree of resemblance


figures whom Arndt proposes to

Antinous

to

in

youthful

either of the

identify with Hadrian's favourite

whom

Similarly, the bearded figure in

are in fact types, not portraits.

they

Arndt sees a pronounced likeness to Hadrian (if not a portrait of that


Emperor) is that of an attendant and not of an Imperial personage at all,
and is by no means like Hadrian.
5.

of the

On the

Arch

other hand, our examination of the

led to positive results

has been said above that in

It

which
all

raise a curious

is

and

in

by Constantine's order from one monument

Emperor

the background of the relief at the time

new

destination,

and

it

is

Emperor

This

to another.

In the

first

when the

place

sculptures received their

clearly necessary to seek the reason

medallions only were thus distinguished.


features of the

problem.

each case encircled with a nimbus carved in

in

is

difficult

ancient times, but were simply

not the case with the reliefs on the northern front.

the head of the

on the N. face

probability the reliefs of the S. face

underwent no restoration or alteration


transferred

reliefs

are in

why

these

In the second place, the original

no case preserved.

But we are

in

presence

of the remarkable fact that not one, but two portrait-types are found, and

In the two hunting-scenes, Nos. V. and VII.,

that these occur alternately.

we have
in

a portrait of Constantine himself,

who

is

most clearly recognizable

the case of the boar-hunt (No. V.), where the features have sustained

The treatment of the hair and eyes is


Emperor and period, and the identification may be
considered certain.^
Nor can it be doubted that the head of the Emperor
It is, however,
in the lion scene (No. VII.) is that of the same individual.

comparatively

little

damage.

characteristic of the

noteworthy that both heads

at first sight

been broken off and replaced.

It

wear the appearance of having

would, of course, have been natural for

the restorer commissioned to introduce the portrait of Constantine in these


reliefs to

'

vii.

On

saw

off the original

head

in

order to

fit

the

new on

to a

smooth

the portraits of Constantine see Petersen, Atti delP Accadeinia Poutificia, Serie II., vol.

pp. 159

ff.

The

234

Instead of

surface.

and the new ones

we

the original heads have been roughly broken off

this,

with great care to the breakage, insomuch that

fitted

are almost obliged to

of the surface.

British School at Rome.

It

assume that the

may seem

worked from a

artist

plaster cast

indeed scarcely credible that a method of

procedure at once so clumsy and so laborious should have been chosen but
the facts leave no room for doubt on the point, especially as the newly;

made

portraits of Constantine

do not

of the neck, although they do

now

behind the head

head

at

its

fit

so in

closely to the breakage at the back

front.

We

find that in

each case

existing (which stands free) remains of the original

junction with the background are traceable.

In the case of the

boar-hunt these can easily be seen from below, since the head of Constantine

is

bent forward at a considerably more acute angle than was that of

the Emperor

originally

represented; but they can also be detected by a

close examination in the scene of the lion-hunt,

where the original head

was not so much turned to the left as is that of Constantine. It is difficult


to suggest any reason for the method followed by the restorer, unless it be
that the heads had been broken off, whether by accident or design, at some
time previous to their transference to the Arch of Constantine.

6.

earlier

The

substitution of the portrait of Constantine for that of an

Emperor on

same, however,

is

this arch

is,

of course, no matter for surprise.

not the case with the unquestionable fact that

has hair and beard treated

in a style

first

which

is

The

the two

Emperor represented

scenes of sacrifice to Apollo and Hercules the


neither Constantine nor any ruler of the

in

is

or second centuries A.D., but


certainly not earlier than the

time of Severus Alexander and might well be considerably

later.

Further-

method pursued by the restorer in these cases is totally different


from that employed by the artist who replaced the original heads in the
hunting scenes by the portrait of Constantine. Here the heads are the
original heads very carefully worked over with the chisel, so closely indeed
more, the

that at

head

first

and

sight the glaring contrast in style between

surroundings, seen

its

inexplicable.

at

close

the third century

quarters,

minute examination revealed the

seemed

fact that in

almost
the case

of the sacrifice to Apollo (No. VI.) a line of breakage runs through the

neck and back of the head.

The

[natural inference

would be that the

Imperial portrait had, as in the case of Constantine, been substituted for


that previously existing

but this

is

not the case.

The breakage

has not,

Notes on Roman Hist(jrical Sculptures.


made

as in the other instances, been designedly


restorer

were

of the head

so,

it

would not run upwards, as

it

and moreover the

for the

235

purposes of the

does, through the back

it

fact of its accidental character

those of Apollo and of the beardless companion of the

damage, probably from a

monument

the

to

which

it

Evidently this

on again.

likewise been broken and set


special

fall in

relief

Emperor

relief

have

had suffered
from

the course of transportation

Arch of Constantine.

originally belonged, to the

In the case of the sacrifice to Hercules

think, possible to estimate

it is, I

of working over the original

the depth of surface lost in the process


features, for

clearly

is

confirmed when we observe that two other heads on the same

between the inner edge of the toga drawn over the Emperor's

head and the surface of the hair a smooth edge of 2-3 millimetres

may

depth

now necessary
Now, the
here represented.
7.

in

be observed.

It is

to consider the identification of the

Emperor

Imperial portraits of the third century do

not lend themselves readily to identification, as the study of Bernoulli's


RomiscJie IkonograpJiie

examples, such as

is

There

sufficient to shew.

to-go no further

are,

Above

reveal an

all,

true,

some

fine

the Pupienus and Philippus of the

may

Braccio Nuovo,^ as to which reasonable certainty

been attained.

it is

be said to have

the easily recognizable portraits of Gallienus

amazing outburst of

artistic talent

employed

in portrait-sculpture

under the reign of that Emperor, and enable us to assign to the same
period a

but

number of

has hitherto

it

certaint)^ or

effective

been

works

in

Roman and

other collections

impossible to identify with any approach

Emperor

even probability the portrait of any

Gallienus and earlier than Constantine.


period that our heads belong.

The

Yet

it is

to

than

later

in all likelihood to this

The

features indeed are well marked.

closely-cut hair recedes from the temples.

The brow has deep

horizontal

furrows in the upper portion, and oblique as well as vertical furrows at the
junction of the forehead and nose, where there

Deep

lines are traceable at the corners of the

bony structure
furrow.
1

The

is

is

mouth

marked
and the

indentation.
chin,

whose

sharply marked off from that of the jaws, has a central

indication of the hair

and beard by means of a number of

Nos. 54, 124.

E.g. Braccio Nuovo, 63


Magazzino Archeologico.

Museo

Capilolino, Salone, 38

two unpublished examples

in

the

'

TlIK ])RITISI[ StII(X)L AT

236

on a smooth surface

short, shar[; strokes of the chisel

methods

the

by portrait-sculptors

initiated

Alexander, and no doubt led Arndt


blance to Gordian

(the

treatment are again found

by the

'

frontality

the heads

are

portraiture

is

(for

example)

But

?).-

time

Severus

of

a resem-

to suggest

must be remembered that

it

and

'

and the

later date

gaze which

fixity of

viewed en face

at

is,

distance.

8.

Emperor

find,

do

Strictly

are,

say from 265-295


not,

new

but

won in
we should

A. I).

however, believe that a convincing identification of the

possible on iconographic grounds alone, chiefly because the

is

iconographic value.

little

identity of the person represented.

the death of

Maximianus

in

It is

think, be small

and

well

known

doubt as

to the

that immediately after

310 A.D. Constantine proclaimed himself the

grandson of the deified Claudius Gothicus, who was


as having been the father of Constantius Chlorus.

upon the

artistically

But when we consider the context and

surroundings of the figures there can,

to enlarge

when

frontal

principle^ was

venture to think, precisely what

coin-types of the period in question are of small merit


possess

'

of course the rule under Constantine and his successors

moment, and our heads

expect to

think, clearly indicated

plainly to be observed

is

short

not to be supposed that the victory of the

is

it

younger

at first si^ht recalls

the

in

temporary change of fashion under Gallienus the same methods of

after a

RoM K.

officially

It is

represented

not necessary here

significance of this bold step, which

political

was

intended to secure the prestige of legitimacy for the dynasty which the
far-seeing Constantine
to the

tion

power of

which the

to

was already determined

to

found as a counterpoise

Licinius, nor to trace the history of the singular transformaofficial

legend was forced to submit when Christian

sentiment took offence at the illegitimacy of the origin ascribed by


Constantius Chlorus.*
its first

appearance

would seem,

and

I-,

in the

Loi.

lit.

This

is

'

Whose significance has

be sufficient to say that from the

it

moment

seventh Panegyric of Eumenius,'' delivered, as

at Trier in the

summer

to

of
it

of 310, probably only a few weeks after

not consistent with his dating (tin. 230 A. D. ).


Ijeen explained by Riegl, Die spiitroinische

A'tiiistiiidiistrie, pp.

109

ff.

Streiia Heibigiana, pp.


*

in

It will

See Dessau

in

250 ff.
Hermes, xxiv. 341

Neue Jahrbiichcr f.
109
''

f.,

klass. Philologie,

487.

avita cognalio (

2).

f.

Klebs

in Historische Zeitsclirift,

xxv. 227

and Seeck

1890, 623, and Geschichte des Untergangs der aittikeu IVelt,

Notes on Roman Historical Sculptures.

237

the death of Maximianus,^ the story obtained a remarkable vogue.


repeated

ad nauseam by

the compilers of the Historia

(if it

author of the

life

statue of Claudius
statue

is

is

supposed ancestor.

his

The

Historia Augusta mentions a golden


is

it

probable that this

really identical with that which, according to the biographer of

was

Claudius,^

Capitolinus
I

in the

up by Constantine,* and

set

is

the

were needed) to shew that Constantine

gave a prominent place to representations of


of Elagabalus

is

Nor

subject of constant allusion in the literature of the fourth century.-^

the literary evidence wanting

It

Augusta- and

set

am tempted

to

Rome

up by the people of

an honour

before the temple of Jupiter

never before conferred upon a

doubt whether

in fact the erection

Roman

Emperor.^

of this statue really

dates from the time of Claudius, and was not rather, by a pious fraud,

antedated by the Court historians.


the

first

It is also

worthy of note that

of the passages cited in note 3 infra, mentions


eVt

a6fjT0'i

Tftif

euKovoiv

en, from which

opcofiev^jv

Julian, in

d(peXeiav t?}?

Tr]v

we may

infer that

amongst those of the reigning dynasty.


who seems to have been careful to replace the head

portraits of Claudius figured


If,

then, Constantine

own on the panels of the attic {v. infra) permitted the


third-century Emperor to appear beside his own on the reliefs of

of M. Aurelius by his

head of a

1
Schanz, Rihnische Litteraturgeschichte, iii. 130; Seeck, Gesdiichte des Unter^an(^s der
aniiken Welt, P, 487.
'
Tyr. 31. 6; Claud, passim; Aurel. 44. 4,
Elag. 2. 4, 35. 2; Gall. 7. i, 14. 3
Two facts are noteworthy in connection with these allusions (a) in the only passage where the
relationship of Claudius to the house of Constantine is definitely explained [Claud. 13. 2),
;

XXX

Constantius

is

represented as the son of Claudia, niece of Claudius through his brother Crispus, and
i.e. as the great-nephew of Claudius.
This circumstantial account is, however,

a certain Eutropius,

with the primary version of the story, which is not only found in the Panegyric of
Eumenius, but is implied in numerous inscriptions [C.I.L. xi. 9 = Dessau 699; Bull. Conim. 1881,
C.I.L. ii. 4742 and .Suppl. 6o29 = Dessau 725
C.I.L. ii. 4844 = Dessau 730 ;
p. i97 = Dessau 702
C.I.L. iii. 3705 = Dessau 732 [from Sirmium date 354-5 A.D.]), according to which Constantius was
It must therefore t)e regarded as a modification of the official legend due to
the son of Claudius.
But {b) in several of these passages the so-called Trebellius Pollio speaks of
Christian influence.
Caesar,' from which fact Peter {Die Scriptores Historiae Aiigustae, p. 36) and
Constantius as
Mommsen {Hermes, xxv. 230) infer that Pollio wrote under Diocletian (Constantius became
In that case he could not allude to a story first put forward in 310, much
Augustus May I, 305).
and there is no reason to suspect interpolation in Claud. 13. 2.
less to a later modification of it
Thus Mommsen's view is untenable.
3 Eusebius, proVjably on account of the objections entertained by the Christians to the story,
in conflict

'

alludes to

it

only distantly

QaaiKiKox) avfKadfu al/xaros.

Vita Const,

i.

Julian [Orat.

i.

50
6 D,

Hist.
ii.

51 C

Eccl.
;

x.

Caes.

8,

4)

by the use of

313D) gives no

tlie

phrase

explicit account of

the relationship.
'

2, 4.

3, 4.

In the Epitome (34, 3) and Cacsares (34, 3) of Aurelius Victor the honour
reward for the devotio of Claudius.
*

is

represented as a

TitK J^RiTisii Sciioor. AT RoMi-:

238

the northern front of the arch,


there can,

think, be

no room

all

for

Nor do

be Claudius Gothicus.

of which are distinguished by the nimbus^

doubt that the Emperor represented must


consider the evidence of the coin-portraits

Fig.

2.

otherwise than favourable to this identification.


indeed, of great iconographic value
^

Bernoulli, Roinische Ikonographie,

kdpfc aiif ivjitischen Miiiizcii,

I'l.

I\\ 96.

iii.

2,

but

in

These

three

portraits are not,

marked

Miinztafel VI, Nos. 4, 5

characteristics,

Imhoof-Blumer, Portrat-

Notes on Roman Historical Sculptures.


the furrowed brow, the receding hair on the temples,

239

and the indentation

the junction of nose and forehead, they agree with the head on the

which, as
to

we must remember, was not

some extent

limited

by the

9.

Gothicus,

monument which had

whose

portrait

artist,

who was

3-

We have thus to deal with the

from a

executed by the

features already in existence.

Fk-..

relief

freely

at

reliefs,

may,

fact that

Constantine borrowed the

already been appropriated by Claudius

for

aught we know, have at one time

School at Rome.

TiiK l^RiTisH

240

appeared on the medallions on which he caused his own to be substituted.


It

was only natural

having embraced Christianity as his

that,

he

religion,

should choose the hunting scenes for this purpose rather than those in

which acts of pagan


But we

are, as

sacrifice

were represented.

believe, in a position to

determine the monument from

In order to do so, we must take a


work on the Ara Pads Augustae,^ Petersen (following
a conjecture of Hiilsen^) assigned to that monument two reliefs here

which the medallions were taken.


In his

further step.

reproduced,^ which are walled into the garden front of the Villa Medici,

and represent processions passing in front of two temples, identifiable as


those of the Magna Mater on the Palatine and of Mars Ultor in the
of Augustus by the subjects shewn

Forum

Petersen noted that in the

had been worked over

to the right of the temple facade

precisely similar to those of the

two medallions

view^ that the same Emperor was intended


I

heartily endorse, although

examination of the
connexion with the

But

its full

which

This conclusion
it

by a

close

at a considerable

is

becomes apparent

significance only

in

facts stated above.

There

monument

than the dedication of the

altar,

temple of Mars Ultor was dedicated

Mater was

may

both cases.

Villa Medici reliefs, as the recent excavations have proved, did not

the sculptured friezes of that

These

manner

in

and further expressed the

have been unable to confirm

belong to the Ara Pacis Augustae.

later

in

relief in the Villa Medici,

height from the ground.

The

pedimental decoration.

in their

of these the head of the figure immediately

first

by Augustus

rebuilt

is

no room

and what

is

them amongst
more, they must be
for

which took place


in

2 B.C.,^

after a fire

in

B.C.

for the

and that of the Magna

which took place

in

a.d.**

dates, however, merely furnish the terminus post quevi ; the reliefs

well be, and, as

believe, are, of a considerably later period.

It will

be observed that the temples did not occupy the centre of the large
compositions to which the slabs must at one time have belonged, but were
to the left of the point in

that point

must

which the

in the case of the

interest of the scene culminated.

Magna Mater

relief

depression of the Palatine, where the remains of the domiis Flavin

'
*
5

- Rom. Mitth. 1S99, 104.


photographs kindly supplied to me by I'rof. Petersen.
Ara Pacis Augustae, p. 73, note.

Pp. 10, 58

ft".

Figs. 2, 3, from

Veil.

ii.

100.

'i

Mon. Anc.

iv.

Now,

have been the central

8; Val. Max.

i.

8,

11.

now

Notes on Roman Historical Sculpturks.


stand, while in the other case the temple of

Forum of Augustus, would be


the Forum Transitorium, also
conjecture

to

that

the

Mars

followed in the relief

241

Ultor, standing in the


b)'

a representation of

work of a Flavian emperor.

the

balance

of

the

composition

It is

maintained by the introduction of the temple of Apollo Palatinus


case,

first

and the

teuipliim

Pads

in

the second.

I'lC.

to

me

frieze

b\'

It

survive in a relief

now

in

in

the

has even been suggested

4.

Mr. A.J. H. W'ace that the central portion of the

may

easy

may have been

Magna Mater

the Uffizi at Florence,^ here reproduced.

iii. 29
Xmchmg, Floreiitiiier Fiihrer, 147. The relief came from Rome with
Mr. Wace suggests that it may possil)!)- be identical with that
from the Ara I'acis, etc.
described by Flaminio N'acca [Mem. 37) as tin sacrijiiio con il vitello et aliiini leviti \\\\\c\\ was disIn that case it might well have come from the Gen:i
covered at or near the Quattro Fontane.
'

the

Flavia
to

Fig. 4, Diitschke,

slalis

(\.

infra,

the Flavian

\).

perind

Mr. Wace has examined the original, and believes it to belong


243 ).
he also states that the proportions admit of our assigning the relief 1<J
;

The

242

This represents a

British School at Rome.


to

sacrifice,

the

of which

right

are

two piUti

seen

The

upholding a laureated shield, in front of an architectural background.


building to the

with

left,

of gabled projections, might be identi-

.series

its

the domtis Augustana, while to the right

with

fied

by a high

peristyle reached

flight of steps in

is

seen a Corinthian

which we might recognise the

Between the two is a palm-tree,


by Suetonius ^ of the palm which grew in front
of Augustus' house, and was removed by him m compluviurn deorum
colonnade of the temple of Apollo,

which

recalls the story told

Penathun.
10.

It

natural

is

to

inquire

should have appropriated to his

and

why

in particular

his

own

what reason

for

own use a monument of

the Flavian period,

have been introduced

portrait should

which represents the temple of the Magna Mater.

relief

Gothicus

Claudius

in the

The answer

is

furnished by the narrative of his accession, given in the fourth chapter

of his biography in the Historia Augusta, v/hich runs as follows


nuntiatuni

viiii.

kl.

cogi senatus

iniperatorem factum, neque

sumptis

posset,

'
:

Cum

esset

Aprilis ipso in sacrario Matris sa)iguiuis die Claiidium

itiim

togis

est

ad

suggested, not only the temple of the

sacrorum

Apollinis

Magna

celebrandorum

templum!

If,

as

causa

have

Mater, but also that of Apollo

Palatinus was represented on the frieze to which the Villa Medici relief
belongs,
to his

will

it

own

be seen at once that Claudius had good reason to convert

use.

But more than

monument

to

from

Historia

the

this,

which the

my

in

is

it

reliefs

belief

possible

Titi,
this,

Augusta, where,

in

a passage

determine
is

again drawn

which alludes

(c. 3, 6),

the

to his

the biographer

memor, gentes Flavias quae -< Vespasiani^ et


Domitiani fuerant, propagavit! The meaning of

ilk velut futurorum

'

nolo

autem

dicere

the only reference

activity,

to

belonged, and the evidence

supposed connexion with the house of Constantine


writes

it

made

is

clear

made by
by a

the biographer of Claudius to his building

parallel

in

the

Vita xxx Tyrannorum (which

also belongs to the series ascribed to Trebellius Pollio).

In

c.

33,

we hear

which represent the temples of Magna Mater and Mars Ultor, since
and the relief is of course incomplete at the top. Petersen estimates
the original height of the Villa Medici reliefs at i '55, in accordance with that of the frieze of the
Ara Pacis it might, however, have been somewhat less. The height of the standing figures would
seem to be about the same. Fig. 4 is from photo. Brogi 4085.
the

same

series as those

the height

is

now

'

Aiig. 92.

i'23 m.

Notes on Roman Historical Sculptures.

243

Censorinus inhabited donius piilchern'jna adiuncta gentibus Flaviis,

that

quae quondam Titi principis fuisse

We

perJiibetiir.

Flaviae bore the same signification as gens Flavia,

thus learn that gentes


the tevipluni gentis

viz.,

Flaviae erected by Domitian on the Quirinal, on the site of the house

belonging to Vespasian ad

malum Pimicum,

which he had been born.^

in

Claudius, then, amplified and presumably restored this building, and

was doubtless on

Medici

in the Villa

He

and

so

is

true, called

is, it is

named

was

possible that Claudius attempted

doubtless

propagated

by the Court

it

of the

historians

legend as to the origin

official

monument of the Flavian house may have had its weight


when he set himself to base a claim to legitimacy on his

great

with Constantine
descent, for he

and

his family also bore the Flavian

Spello inscription

erection of a

the Life of Aurelian

In any case, however, the fact that Claudius had set his

of the dynasty."

mark on the

(c. 7, 8),

not confirmed by the inscriptions,

is

order to support the

in

to trace

no evidence of the

is

Flavins Claudius by his biographer

nomenclature

fiction

Constantinian period

the

is

spurious letter inserted in

in

17, 2), but, as this

(c.

It

relief.

it

he caused his portrait to be introduced

from the Flavian Emperors, but there

his descent
fact.

this occasion that

that

Constantine and

We

sons

his

at Hispellum,

temphun gentis Flaviae

name.

learn from

permitted

the

and Aurelius Victor

records the fact that a priesthood of the gens Flavia was created in Africa.
It

seems, therefore, legitimate to suggest (as a working hypothesis) that

the medallions of the Arch of Constantine, like the Villa Medici

some monument of

either from the gens Flavia itself or from

dynasty appropriated by Claudius

Gothicus.

It

relief,

came

the Flavian

has been convincingly

demonstrated by Petersen that the original correspondence between the four


pairs of medallions has been obscured by their redistribution,^ but no
reason could be assigned for this dislocation.
the principle of the

It

new arrangement.

medallions

unrestored

was situated

represented

On

now

are

able to trace

the south face of the arch the

Emperors

the

close to the Quattro Fontane,

We

as has

Flavia

gens

of the

been convincingly demonstrated by

Museum, xlix. 399 ff.).


same way the name Valerius (which was borrowed by Constantine from

Hiilsen (Rheinisches

- In the
assigned to Claudius in the acclainatio given by his biographer

p.

(c.

18, 3)

Diocletian)

see Klebs in P.I.R.

is
i.,

199.
^

C.I.L.

= Dessau,

xi.

6623.

5625

= Dessau, 705;

There were

Caes. 40, 28.

op. lit., p. 230, n. 5.

2.

pontifex gentis Flaviae at Hispellum,

2\%o pontifices Flaviales at

Rome

{C.I.L.

vi.

1690

C.I.L.

f. ).

x.

5283

The

244
antiqita^

British School at Rome.

we may use such an

if

the gens Flavia

7iova,

expression, while on the northern front

distinguished by the solar nimbus, which the identi-

Emperor with Sol invictus had caused to become the symbol


new autocracy, is represented by its reputed founder the Flavins
Claudius of the Court historians and by its greatest representative, already

fication of the

of the

master of
II.

Rome

and the West, and soon to be sole

may

It

be argued that this hypothesis

iconography and style of the


the objections which

There

I.

may

reliefs,

and

(i)

ruler of the Empire.^

inconsistent with the

is

therefore necessary to meet

it is

be raised on these grounds.

are certain technical details in the working- of the

which are generally held to indicate a date not

These are

Trajan.

'

'

reliefs

than the reign of

earlier

The plastic rendering of the iris and pupil of the eye


The treatment of the hair, which Arndt has described
;

(2)

and shews abundant signs of the use of the


(3)

The

use of the drill

drill

working drapery,

in

Now it is important to observe

as 'restless,'

trees,

and architecture.

that archaeologists have

formed their con-

ception of Flavian style from an examination of the reliefs of the Arch of


Titus, which dates from A.D. 81 or 82,

monuments

the

110-117.

A.I).

which a

referred to

There

is in

transformation

inadequately

represented

my

in

fact

took

existing

place

whose

monuments.

unnecessary here to argue this point at length, since


in

Mr. Wace's paper.

go

far to

of our

shew that there

reliefs to

'

It

have survived

In the

very

are

fortunately

fully dealt with

in

the assignment

absence of monumental

the scene of the Imperial cortege (No.

to bear the portrait of Constantine.

all

it is

is

the closing years of Domitian's reign, which were a time

may be asked why

necessary that

the course of

stages
It

no inherent improbability

of busy constructive activity.-

and not selected

in

only say that the facts which he adduces

will
is

style from that of

of which date from

all

an interval of thirty years,

of style

by

and of Trajanic

previous paper,

the Flavian Emperors

even

It

is

I.)

was removed from

possible that

reliefs,

its

fellow,

Constantine thought

it

including Domitian, whose portrait would of cimrse

in the private mausoleum of his family


should be represented on the southern front,
and that no other medallion remained with Domitian's portrait, either Claudius or Constantine
having replaced it by their own features.
- The earliest allusions to the Gens Flavia
are to be found in the Fourth IJook of the Silvae of
Statius and the Ninth of Martial, i.e. in 95 A.D.
The temple of Minerva in the Forum Transitorium,
unfinished at Domitian's death, was dedicated by Nerva after Sept. i8, 97 (C.I.L. vi. 31213), and
the Janus (^)uadrifrons, which it contained, by Trajan (Mart. x. 28
The construction was in
51).
;

Notes on Roman Historical Sculptures.

245

archaeologists have formed their conception of Flavian technique mainly

But the conventions

from a consideration of portrait-busts and statues.


of portrait-sculpture (and

conventions which are

is

it

question) are

in

same as those of historical relief To take a case in


now well known that in monumental sculpture the plastic

not necessarily the


point,

is

it

indication of the pupil

Ara

such

display

form on the

in a tentative

of the

reliefs

no portrait-busts of the Julio-Claudian

Augustae, although

Pacis

dynasty

found

is

The

tieatment.

method by which the

precise

was given varied greatly until the Antonine period, when a


But there are several portrait-busts,
fixed convention was adopted.
undoubtedly of the Flavian epoch, which shew the plastic treatment of
indication

And

the eye}

such examples are found

if

same

natural to expect the

One

in the

(No. 350
the

No. 10

member

same person

The

drill.

the

and

'

it

is

is

remarkable

it

is

life,

to be noted

recalls the toupets

These,

Flavian house.
the

Sala dei busti of the Vatican

in

list),

is

at a later period of

of his family, and

manner which

in a

It

Mr. Wace's

connexion with

also important in

is

for its likeness to

Marcus Antonius of the Braccio Nuovo.^

so-called

represent the

in

is

it

case of historical- reliefs.'^

of the busts just mentioned

the rendering of the hair.

portrait-sculpture,

in

worn by

it

If

does not

it

certainly reproduces

that the hair

worked

is

the Imperial ladies of the

hardly necessary to urge, involve a free use of

Marcus Antonius

'

of the Braccio

Nuovo

perhaps

the

finest

Flavian portrait, whose unbroken bust furnishes conclusive evidence

of

date

its

may

has

been adequately

criticised

by Mr. Crowfoot, whose words

here quote with reference to the rendering of the hair


of

hair, in spite

its

complexity and longitudinal

drilling, there

'

In the

no trace

is

of the restlessness or of the careful dryness which so often spoils the effect
of Antonine sculpture.'

The medallions

of the Arch of Constantine are

of course not to be compared for delicacy of treatment with the portrait


yet,

if

'

restlessness

Antonius than

'

there be,

it

is

rather to

be seen

in

in the reliefs.

iv. 3, 9 f.), but the use of the expression Palladium forum


was begun much earlier for i. 2 does not necessarily belong even
when a second edition of i.-vii. was issued (Schanz, Rbinische Litterattirgeschichtc, ii.

progress in 95 (Stat. Silv.


is

no proof that

it

may have been

Marcus

the

prefixed to the final edition of Martial's poems.

The Forum

is

in Mart.

to

i.

p. 329), but
not otherwise

mentioned in i.-ix. (up to 95 A. D. ).


^ See the list,
See a.\so/./I.S. 1900, pp. 33 f.
pp. 290, 291, Nos. 2, 6, 9, 10, 12, 16, 22.
* Mr. Wace informs me that this treatment is found on the Ufiizi relief (Fig.
4) in two cases.
3 No.
97 A /.U.S. 1900, PI. IV.
;

the lime

The
in

British School at Romk.

The

246
use of the

sculpture

drill in

Mr. Wace's paper that

of the Flavian epoch

it

and

a question of degree.

all

hard to find

but

here,

it

is

lays stress on

Arndt

true, parallels are, as

it

its

happens,

are clearly traceable in the laurel

fact drill-holes

in

shewn

probability none of the reliefs which he

publishes are quite so late as these medallions.

use in the rendering of foliage

It is

by the monumental sculptors

freely used

was
in

is

branch borne by the figure which heads the Imperial cortege on the Arch
of Titus.

So
is

far,

then, as the

argument from technical

no decisive proof that the

On

reign.

the other hand,

an age finds
conventions.

its

Style

expression.

And

not

in
is

concerned, there

is

than the close of Domitian's

reliefs are later


it is

detail

such detail alone that the


in

truth

more than mere

spirit

the style and spirit of the medallions stand

in

monumental sculptures of that

We

intensely realistic.

which, for

all

that

it

dominated thereby.

see in

owes

The

which the previous paper was

period, with
is

intensely

them

the

The

sharpest contrast to those of the latter years of the reign of Trajan.

concerned, breathe a spirit which

of

technical

Roman,

intensely serious, and

the efflorescence of true Italian art,

to Hellenistic influence

and

tradition,

they are conceived, and the directness with which they

is

manner

subjects of representation, the

no longer
in

which

are rendered, reflect

the spirit of a time of great achievements fully realised and imperishably

enshrined in the creations of a truly Imperial


the

Arch of Beneventum,

for

example, there

is

Into the sculptures of

art.

crowded, as von Domaszewski

monument

has shewn, a wealth of meaning which makes the


of

all

that Trajan achieved for Italy and the Empire.

composition, however, there

is

loss

as well as gain.

New

some

to

overcrowding

cases to conspicuous failure.

of free space

summary

experiments

perspective, such as are attempted in the reliefs of Trajan's


in

In technique and

In composition there

in

Column, lead
is

a tendency

balance and symmetry are obscured, and the impression

is lost.

In details the

work

is

hard and dry, and even at

its

best shews care rather than facility.

The medallions belong

to a very different school.

Decorative as they

are, they are yet of considerable technical merit, and display remarkable
facility

and even bravura

Artemis, for example,


artistic

in

execution.

when seen

The

figures

at close quarters,

of Apollo

reveal a

and

degree of

talent not often reached in sculpture of an ornamental character,

destined to be subordinate, to an architectural design and to be viewed at a

Notes on Roman Historical Sculptures.

The compositions do not as a whole deserve the


who brands them as lifeless, smooth,

considerable distance.

hard words applied to them by Arndt,

'

grouped together

and regards the figures as


whole rather than inwardly connected by a

and

'

artificial;

tive

247

common

in a representa-

action.'

seems

It

to me, on the contrary, that the artist has attained no small measure of
From the nature of his
success in solving a somewhat difficult problem.

was not easy to avoid monotony and repetition of motives, yet


Amongst the four scenes of sacrifice
this is exactly what he has achieved.
we have two in which the image occupies a central position (Apollo and
ArtemisJ but while in the latter case there is strict symmetry between

subject

it

the figures on either side, in the former the balance of the composition
In

shews greater freedom.

the other two scenes

it

is

the figure of the

Emperor, not of the divinity, which forms the centre of the composition,
while the direction of the movement and the nature of the background are
varied.

So, too, in the case of the hunting-scenes,the actual pursuit

senting which repetition could not well be avoided

in the

is

in repre-

only shewn twice, with

of riders and the position of the

contrast in the lines of the triangle

Emperor

other scenes, a strictly symmetrical composition in the

instance of the lion-hunt^ contrasts with a freely balanced group with


All
background of which the Emperor forms the centre.
triumphs
who
an
artist
reveals
and
resource,
of
this shews great fertility
The panels of the arch at Beneventum, even
in the concealment of art.
architectural

this nicety

finest, lack

the

of

balance, just

as they

fall

of the

short

spaciousness and freedom of the medallions.

But with

all

their brilliance in execution, the tondi are lacking in the seri-

ousness of Trajanic sculpture.

Rossini'^

recalled the fact that a coin of Trajan

Forum Trajani

to the

and Arndt (independently) have

represents the arch at the entrance

as decorated with medallion-sculptures.

But what

could be more incongruous with the ensemble of the sculptures of that

Forum as we know them from

the

Column and

the Great Frieze

than

these hunting scenes, which are devoid of historical and political signifi-

cance

It is far

busts, either (as

house.

more probable that the

is

most

clipei

of the arch contained large

likely) of divinities or of

Since the time of Bellori

it

members of the Imperial

has been customary to quote

in

illus-

This however is not a central composition, but has two culminating points in the figures of
Emperor and his comes, so that the rise and fall of the interest may be represented by the line M.
'

the

Archi

trion/ali, p. II.

Cohen, 167;

PI.

XXIX. No.

5.

Thk

248

British School at Ro.mk.


Pliny the

tration of the medallions a passage from the Paufgyn'ciis of

Younger

(c.

81),

who

Quae

thus addresses Trajan:

oiiui rcinissio tibi nisi

Instrave saltus, exaitere aibilibiis /eras, siiperare iiiunefisa uiontium iuga et

graduin inferre

Jiorreiitibns scopulis

atqiie inter

haec pia niente adire

niillnis ninnii, ini/liiis I'estigio adiutuiii

liicos et oceiirsare

nuniinibus ?'

It

is

no

doubt true that the medallions might well serve to illustrate the Panegyricus, if

such an illustration were consonant with the

But

is

this

And

precisely the reverse of the fact.^

that Domitian's favourite recreation was


his villa at

Suetonius

Albano.

him:

/eras saepe in Albano secessn conficienteni spectavcre

quarundani capita Jigentem

industria ita

We may

efficerei!

of whom

recall the

Juvenal writes

(iv.

of the time.

not be forgotten

slaying of wild

the

19) writes of

(c.

spirit

will

it

'

beasts at

Centenas varii generis

pleriqiie,

atqne etiavi ex

at dnobus ictibiis quasi cornua

famous story of Acilius Glabrio the Younger,

99)

profnit ergo nihil viiscro qnod couiininus nrsos


figebat Nuniidas Albana nndns fiarena

uenator

while Dio

(Ixvii.

Domitian's

commemorati

.n

us

tells

14)

that

That such

presence.

when consul he

exploits

should

killed

be held

lion

in

worthy of

rather than the conquest of provinces or acts of Imperial

clemency or bounty,

is

characteristic

of the

time and

personality

of

Domitian.II.
,^

2-4,

The iconography
where

it

of the medallions has already been discussed in

was shewn that the

identification of certain figures with

Hadrian and Antinous could not be maintained, while no personages of


It is, however, possible to draw
the time of Trajan could be recognized.
certain

more

positive inferences from the facts.

It

was said above that

in

the one case where the features of the original Imperial portrait are partly
1

Arndt

calls attention to the fact that

Hadrian hunted boars (Dio,

Ixix.

lo),

Vita Hadr. 20. 13, Kaibel, Epigr. Graeca, 811), and Hons (Ath. xv. 677 E, Vita
his passion for the chase
that, if the

is

medalHons are

bears (Dio,

Hadr.

26. 3),

I.e.

and

And it cannot be denied


perpetuated by coin-types (Cohen, 502 f.).
than the Flavian period, they are far more in keeping with the spirit

later

of Hadrian's time than with that of Trajan's rule.

In 1887 a sanctuary of
perhaps not without significance.
site of the Gens Flavia {Notizie degli Scavi,
1887, p. 109; Bull. Comm. 1887, p. 102; Kheiii. Mus. 1894, p. 400), and one of the three
dedications there found belongs to Flavius Sabinus, whose house, as is well known, adjoined the
2

The

representation of Silvanus

is

Silvanus was discovered at no great distance from the

Gens Flavia [Rhein. Mus.

I.e.).

Cp. C.I.L.

vi.

644, Silvanus Flavioyuin.

Notes on Roman Historical Sculptures.

249

preserved, their present condition does not admit of certain identification.


is,

It

however, important to observe that the lower part of the face

decidedly

full,

a feature which

rather than of Trajan

particularly the Trajan of later years, as

way

of his Arch,

person

(also imperfectly preserved)


I

on the

relief in the

e.g.

passage-

see no improbability in the supposition that the

represented in both

is

shewn

Indeed, after examining closely both this head

on the arch of Beneventum.

and that of Titus

is

is

characteristic of the Flavian emperors

With

reliefs.

same

regard to the other figures,

it is

important to distinguish the aristocratic comites of the Emperor (uhose

from the attendants, amongst

portraits are carefully rendered)

whom

are to

be included the figures which have been supposed to resemble Hadrian

and Antinous.
their position

Their subordinate character

and

Emperor

stands immediately behind the


of Nos.

I.

and VII.

;^ in

the

is

first

in

thus a bearded figure

No. VI. and

in the

background

of these latter cases he holds a lance

which marks him out as a representative of the specn/atores praetoriaiiiwhich, as

corps

by the
represented by a
privileges

will

be remembered, was apparently accorded special

first

Emperor

figure

The same body

of the Flavian house.^

wearing short whiskers and carrying the lance

Beard and whiskers,

No. VIII.

by

indicated clearly enough

the several scenes

functions in

it

maybe

noted, are

worn by the

is

in

lictors

and other attendants of the Emperors from the Flavian period onwards,*
though the habit was not adopted by persons of rank until Hadrian set

Emperor and his comites


always shod differently from the attendants. Wherever the feet
sufficiently well preserved to admit of certainty, we observe that
the fashion.

It is

principal figures

also to be noted that the

wear

peculiar calcei

whose uppers consist


'

'

in

two

are
are

the

flaps of

leather laced together in front, forming a light shoe better adapted for the

chase than the calceus senatoriiis worn with State dress, except
of No.

II.,

where the Emperor wears the

hand, either wear calcei of a different

other

Emperor and

his

companions

The

caliga.

or (in several cases)

in

the case

attendants, on the

type from those of the

go barefoot.

In externals, then, the artist has given clear indication of the distinctions of rank
'

between the several

figures.

But more than

this,

the facial

Petersen sees a resemblance between this figure and the bust in the Museo Capitolino,
This latter is, however, a modern work ; it is intended as a portrait of Hadrian.

Gallcria 32.
-

See below,

From

E.g. on the Arch of Titus.

p. 263 (and note).


Vespasian's time they are separately mentioned in the Diploinala.

See Mr. Wace's remarks, infra,

p. 27S.

TiiK British

!5o

School at Romk

type of the aristocratic members of the Emperor's

been studied from the


period,

whose

life,

is

very marked.

It

who have

suite,
is

clearly

that of the Flavian

portraits are so easily recognizable in

Roman and

other

in more than one case there is a vcr)- strong likeness to the


Emperors of the Flavian dynasty. It is somewhat difficult to determine
The most
with certainty how many individuals are here represented.

museums, and

striking portrait

is

that of the figure facing the

lion-hunt), with exceptionally

Fk;.

to identify

him with

which rides

in front

heavy e}ebrows.

Emperor
I

in

I-k;.

5.

on these

an)- other figure

Emperor

of the

in

No.

reliefs,

III. (Fig. 5)

clearly identical with the person represented

No. VII. (the

do not think

it

possible

6.

unless

it

but he

is,

be that
I

think,

on one of the larger fragments

Wace (PL XXX. Fig. i).^ A second


who leads a horse in No. VI. and faces

from the Lateran, published by Mr.


individual

is

Emperor

the
^

But

(>/

the beardless figure


in

No. VIII.

with the so-called

'

Bernoulli, J^omische Ikonograpliie,

while a third

whose resemblance to Vespasian

Domilius Ahenobaibus of the IMuseo Chiaramonti (No. 561;


i.
PI. IX.), with which the head has l)een compared by I'etersen.
'

Notes on Roman Historical Sculptures.


is

striking

rides behind the Emperor

in

No. V., and

some of these

portraits represent

presence would be natural

of the medallions

It

may

well be that

of the Flavian house, whose

the Ge/is Flavia were the original destination

if

any case

in

members

perhaps also to be

is

recognized to the spectator's left in No. IV. (Fig. 6)}

251

it is,

think, impossible that such a gallery

of Flavian portraiture can belong to a time appreciably later than the

death of Domitian.

III. The
I.

'

Aurelian

Panels of the Arch of Constantine.

'

The eight sculptured panels which decorate the

of Constantine on

whose

reliefs

northern and southern faces

its

by

attributed to Trajan

Bellori

and by

Petersen, at a meeting of the

until

were, like

all

who

the writers

German

of the

Emperor has

Constantine

but

it

So

were executed.

Arch,

followed him,

Institute held on

demonstrated that they belonged to a different period.

1890,2

the other

clearly earlier than the building of the

was

origin

Arch

attic of the

March

14,

The head

in

each of the eight cases been restored to represent

is

not certain at what date the present restorations

far as

can be judged from photographs, the heads would

belong to the period of Clement XII., who caused the sculptures


The engravers of the seventeenth
of the Arch to be restored in 1731.
^
but, as they give a
as beardless
Emperor
the
likewise represent
century

seem

to

restored rendering of

all

the reliefs of the

theory as to the Emperor

From

represented, their

the sixteenth century

certain of the scenes.

for

Arch and embodied


evidence

is

their

own

inconclusive.

we have the engravings of Battista Franco*


The artist indifferently draws the Emperor as

and as he places a bearded figure immediately in


front of the Emperor in the scene which takes place in the Castra

bearded and beardless

Praetoria,

and likewise gives the boy-hostage a beard, we cannot attach

any importance to his reproductions. On the other hand, a sixteenthcentury drawing formerly in the Hamilton Laing collection and now in
^

Figs. 5

The

and 6 are from photographs taken by Mr. A. J. B. Wace.


first appears in Petersen's article on the tondi, Rom. Mitth. 1889, 317.

true dating

paper on the reHefs


*

Pis.

Perrier,

is

hones

published Rotn. Mitth. 1890, 73


et

segmetita,

Pis.

XXVII. -XXXIV.

XXIV.-XXXI.
'

His-

ff.

Bartsch, Le Peintre-gravetir, xvi. 135, Nos. 48-53,

Bellori,

Veteres arcus

Augustorum,

'

The

252

British School at Rome.

the possession of the Royal Scottish Academy,^ which represents the S.


face of the Arch, shews the figure of the Emperor headless, and it therefore

seems highly probable that Constantine caused

his

own

features to be

substituted for those of the original sculptures, but that the Constantinian

heads, being insecurely fixed, were lost at a comparatively early date and

by Clement XII.

restored

The

of the

style

points out, leaves no doubt

Petersen

as

reliefs,

whatever that they belong to the time of M. Aurelius and to the same
series as the three reliefs in the Palazzo dei Conservatori removed
thither from the church of S. Martina in

1525.'-

Petersen, indeed, con-

siders that the fourth relief in the Palazzo dei Conservatori,

which

220) was brought thither from the Piazza

was mentioned above, p.


may belong to the same
seems to point to an
extremely
^

2.

series

from the

but. apart

subject

date, the

earlier

difficult to place in the series

We have thus to deal with

now under

(as

Sciarra,

fact that its style

would be

represented

consideration.

eleven panels representing the wars

waged by M. Aurelius on the Danube frontier and his ultimate triumph


and it is natural to suppose that as they now decorate a triumphal arch
In that case they must once have
they were so employed originally.
been even in number, and not less than twelve. More than this we

cannot say with certainty

may

but an examination of the subjects

lead

us to a probable conjecture.

existence of one such triumphal arch of M. Aurelius

The
the

copied

inscription

{C.I.L. vi. 1014),

Antonini

fil.

by the Anonymus Einsiedlensis

whose text runs

divi Veri

Parth.

as follows:

Max.

'

fratri, divi

S.P.O.R.

'

is

proved by
Capitolio

in

Imp. Caes. divi

Hadriani nep., divi Traian

Nervae abnep. M. Aurelio Antonino Aug. Germ.


maxim, tribunic. pot. xxx, imp. viii, cos. iii, p.p., quod

Parth. [projnep., divi

pontif

Sarm.,

omnes omnium ante

se

maximorum imperatorum

bellicosissimis gentibus deletis aut subactis

The
1

(Plate

It

date of this inscription


is

XX.

contained

in

vol.

xi.

is

176,

glorias

supergressus,

.'
.

and there can therefore be no doubt

24 of the Hamilton Laing drawings and is reproduced


by Mr. Inglis, taken by the kind permission of the President

fol.

Fig. 2) from a photograph

and P'ellows of the Royal Scottish Academy.


^
Lanciani, Storia degli Scavi, i. 221 f.
See Rodocanachi, Le Capitole roviain, 143^
Rodocanachi gives the date as 1524. I am unable to reconcile the discrepancy between these
L., Cred. i.
R. gives Cred. i. 15, f. 139
authors as to the document recording the transaction.
;

35>

c.

177.


Notes on Roman Historical Sculptures.

253

it was erected
in commemoration
of the triumph celebrated byMarcus over the Germans and Sarmatians towards the close of that year.^
It is moreover probable that its site was in the immediate neighbour-

that

hood of the church of


reliefs in

existence of an arch in this region

The

(i.)

we saw, the three


The evidence for the

Martina, from whence, as

S.

the Palazzo dei Conservatori were taken.

lists

is

as follows

of arais trmmpJiales contained in the Mirabilia and

its

various recensions which follows the line of the Via Lata ends with the

arms panis

aiirei in Capitolio

Anonymus

Magliabecchianus, while the thirteenth and fourteenth century

same monument

recensions speak of the


(ii.)

is

In a

document which purports

From

SS. Apostoli are traced.


as follows

as arcus aicreus in Capitolio).

to be a bull of

probably scarcely earlier than 1200

boundary runs

A.D.,

viam

secus

Jiortum

argentariorum

qni

III.,^

'

but which

the church of S. Maria in Via Lata the

inde recto itinere producitiir per

dicitur

mirabilis,

used because the arch

is

John

the limits of the parish of the

monte Tarpeio tisque ad arcinn argcntarioriun

stib

document and the

(so the twelfth-century

in

et

inde

Here

etc!

iticr

viam qnae est


ad laeviun per

the

term

arcus

question spanned the Clivus

Argentarius (roughly corresponding with the modern Via di Marforio).

The

hortiis mirabilis

(see Lanciani,

occupied part of the

Forma Urbis Romae

There seems no reason

doubt that

to

the inscription copied by the

Anonymus

was the source of the

preserved

in

any case be necessary

to

nor would

it

in

their provenance

reliefs

but

it

of Marcus Aurelius in
that

the Arctis de

triumphal arch

doubting
^

of

this in a

Von Rohden

(in

is

doubtful

Rome.

Marcus

if

this arch,

which

of Augustus

is

described, like

the church of S. Martina hard by,

go further

afield in the search for

another arch was erected

Mr. Frothingham

but

Forum

Einsiedlensis, as being in Capitolio,

mentioned

Tosectis

of the

site

22).

in

'^

in

honour

has recently suggested

mediaeval authorities was a

have ventured to give reasons

for

note appended to this paper.


Pauly-Wissovva, Reakncyclopddie,

place Nov. 27, on which date

Commodus

received the

i.

2302) thinks that the triumph took


of Imperator, and that Commodus

title

triumphed alone on Dec. 23 but it is repeatedly stated (as he admits) that father and son triumphed
jointly, and the fact that the inscription quoted above is dated in the 30th tribunicia potestas of
Marcus furnishes no proof whatever of the fact that the actual triumph had taken place by Dec. 10.
- Jordan,
Topographic der Stadt Koni, ii. 669 f.
Urlichs, Codex Topographiciis Urbis Romae,
;

pp.

199
^

f.

Aiiier. Jotirn.

Arch. 1904, pp. 26 (Xo. 261), 34.

The

254
2-

British School at Ro>n:.

would seem, then, that our reHefs belonged to a monument


176 A.D. to commemorate the double triumph of Marcus over

It

erected in

Germans and Sarmatians ^ which took place in the


They therefore challenge comparison with
year.'

the
the

closing

months of

the reliefs of the

Antonine Column, which, as is generally believed, formed a memorial of


But here we are met by an initial difficulty. In spite
the same triumph.
of all that has been done for the interpretation of the reliefs of the column

by the fine publication which we owe to the initiative of the German


Emperor, they present to us problems which are still unsolved. Von
Domaszewski, indeed, has endeavoured by a brilliant series of divinations
but
to trace the history of Marcus' campaigns as depicted on the column
;

his assumption that the two halves of

the

series

correspond with the

Belhnn Germaniciim (171- 172) and the Bellmn Sarmaticiun (174-175) is


combated by Mommsen, who believes the column to have been erected
after the

death of the Emperor, and to represent

in

the

first series

of reliefs

the campaigns previous to the triumph of 176, and in the second those

which intervened between that triumph and the death of Marcus. In that
case the analogy of the Column of Trajan, where the central Victory
symbolizes the
is

first

Dacian triumph,

to the serious objection

open

father in the later war,

The

truth

is

year

74,

for

is
it

inscriptions,^

is

have held

'

is

(in

Xiphilinus' epitome) in the

brought into connexion with the seventh salutatio

and also

is

(as

fixed to that year

by the evidence of coins ^

appears from the order of the narrative)


is

said

by

his

biographer

shortly before the revolt of Avidius Cassius' (in 175),

the other hand, the place which the scene occupies on the column
1

164

We

his

Now

represented on the column.^

dated by Cassius Dio

with the consulship of Pertinax, which office he


to

but the theory

nowhere represented.

imperatoria of Marcus, which

and

Commodus, who accompanied

we are met by a serious dilemma. It is beyond


natural phenomenon known to Christian tradition as the

Miracle of the Thundering Legion

occurrence

be exactly followed

that

is

dispute that the

this

will

that

have coins with the legend

DE GERM.

(Cohen, 154, 161) and

is

DE SARM.

On

in the
(Cohen,

f.).

On

the date see p. 253, note

i.

Scene xvi.
Imp. VII. is found on some coins of 174 (Cohen, 311 ft'.), l)ut not e.g. on \\\it Advent us
Augusti coins struck early in the year.
' The title is not found e.g.
on C.I.L. xi. 371 (Ariminum), but \s e.g. on C.I.L. viii. 17869
*

-*

(Lambaesis).

Notes on Roman Historical Sculptures.


campaigns represented, which according

first of the

belongs to the year 171 and the


at

sight compelled

first

belliLin

either

to

von Domaszewski

to

We

Germanicuni.

255

seem therefore

(with von Domaszewski) the

reject

testimony of Dio as to the date of the occurrence, and to place


or (with

Mommsen)

column

to treat the narrative of the

it

in 171,

as beginning in

174 and as interrupted by the triumph of 176.


I

do

not, however, feel sure that

it

possible to reconstruct from the

is

scenes of the Antonine column a continuous narrative of military operations such as the studies of Cichorius and Petersen have enabled us to
trace

in

whether

the
it

of Trajan's column.

reliefs

was possible

whose objective

to

territory,

be doubted, indeed,

frame so definite a plan of campaign as that

both of Trajan's wars) was necessarily the occupation

(in

Marcus' aim was not to add to the Empire a

of the Dacian capital.


definite

may

It

any

or indeed

territory,

but to break up and render

powerless for aggression a widely-spread coalition of tribes and to secure


the barrier of the

Danube from such

and security of Italy


of the

tum

Roman

his

broke

He

in 166.

in

field

commander

169^ as sole

armies, Verus having died in January, and,

making Carnun-

base of operations during a period of three years,^ gradually

up the combination

We

detail.

inroads as had threatened the peace

took the

of

German peoples and

defeated them in

cannot even be sure of the order in which the excerpts

various writers from Cassius

by

Dio should be placed but it seems highly


first attacked,^ and terms granted to them
;

probable that the Quadi were

on

their submission in order to detach

who

neighbours on the west,

them from the Marcomanni,

their

could thus be dealt with by themselves and

were moreover separated from the Sarmatian lazyges by a neutral zone.

The biographer

of Marcus speaks of a victory

in ipso transitu Daniivii,

salutatio

much

imperatoria,

to be

won over

Marcomanni

the

which was doubtless the occasion of the sixth

recorded on coins of 171 *;

but

done before the situation could be deemed

there remained
secure,

and the

legend Gerwania subacta on the coins of 172, 173, and 174^ alludes to the
toilsome process which the
1

Emperor

felt

obliged to superintend in person.

Coins of 169 have the X'igitn^ project io Aiigusti (Cohen, 500).


Eutrop. viii. 13, cum apiid Carnuntiim iugi trietmio persevcrarei,

bellitni

Marcoinauniciim

ionfecit.
^

The

subscriptio of the Jirst

Tpavova, that of the second


*

Cohen, 260, 267

ff.,

is rb.

book

ot

the Meditations of

Marcus

is

-rb.

iu KovdSois -rrphs

sV 'Ka)vo{ivT<p.

276, 279.

Cohen, 214, 215

f.

217-226.

t^

School at Rome.

TiiK British

256

He assumed
ferred

the

title

Germanicus

in 172,^

and on Oct.

of that year con-

15

on Commodus, now eleven years of age.

it

The

the bellum Sarmaticum.

the bellum Geriiianiaim has succeeded

To

In 174 the scene changes.

chief

enemy

whose position

are the lazyges,

between the Danube and the Theiss was flanked on both sides by the
In this war the Emperor's headprovinces of Pannonia and Dacia.
where the famous trial of
Sirmium,
at
quarters appear to have been

Herodes Atticus took


rendered especially

made

the treaty
Iazyges.3

in

took

seventh sahttatio imperatoria was

and Marcus assumed the


Cassius prevented the
his

title

and

place

leading to the

the victory

won, according to Dio's dating

175 a victory over the lazyges

and caused

174 was

by the treachery of the Ouadi, who violated


the earlier war and made common cause with the
this second conflict with the Ouadi that the
in

miraculous thunderstorm

In

year

the

in

difficult

was

It

But the situation

place.-

{v.

supra).

was greeted with an eighth sahitatio,^


But the rebellion of Avidius

Sarmaticus.^

Emperor from reaping

triumph to be deferred

the

fruits

full

until his return

of his victory,

Rome

to

in 176.

capital
It has been a matter of dispute whether he had visited the
but on this point, as we
since his departure for the seat of war in 169
;

shall see presently, the

Now,

if

is

reliefs

seems

decisive.

Dio's testimony with regard to the miraculous thunderstorm

be accepted,

column

evidence of our

quite clear that the order of events represented on the

it is

ideal,

not historical

for the

occurrence belongs to the period of

Sarmaticum and not to that of the bellum Germaniciun. But the


artists of the column clearly distinguish two barbarian types, of which one
German and the other doubtless Sarmatian, and, as Petersen has
is

the bellnin

demonstrated, the former prevails (though not to the complete exclusion


of the other) in the scenes of the first half, while the latter predominates
in those

of the second.

believe therefore that

we have no attempt

to

campaigns on the Danube, but rather a


and operations grouped according to the people

trace a continuous narrative of the


selection of typical scenes

involved

in

war.

the

It

should

be observed

that

the

occurrence of

the well-known scenes of the lustratio exercitus and allocutio

1450

Commodus
(tr.

received the

pot. xxvi., but

Philostr. Soph.

Cohen, 353-355.

ii.

Imp.
I,

p.

title

Oct. 15, 172

v.), viii.

67 K.

4209 (arch

Vita Comnt. ir, 13), and


at

it is

Verecunda).
"

Die, Ixxi.

C.I.L.

13.

viii.

2276.

cannot be

found on C.I.L.

iii.

Notes on Roman Historical Sculptures.


used (as

of Trajan's Column)

in the case

There

of each campaign.
the series

and that which

ing a victory at

no

is

commencement

the

second half of

lustratio exercitus in the

shewn

is

passage

the

to define

of a

in

257

scene xxx, immediately follozv-

river

(perhaps

that

which the

in

Marcomanni were defeated), most certainly does 7iot inaugurate a new


cannot, then, follow von Domaszewski in his ingenious
campaign.
I
attempt to define time and place of the several operations represented,
principle of typical selection

and believe that the

shew

in a

more

direct form

must

be admitted.

thus represented because the Quadi were the

Ouadi hold the

first

our panels

T^e thunderstorm was


enemy engaged, and the

place in the series.^

was necessary to discuss the

It

which

reliefs

of the Antonine

Column

in

order

no certain canon of interpretation for our panels,


except in so far as they clearly distinguish the belliim Gernianiann from
the belliim Sarniatiaun, a distinction confirmed by the fact of the double
to

shew that they

afford

triumph and the assumption of both the corresponding


Emperor.^

Now, the same

has noted on the column

differentiation of barbarous types

which Petersen

no

difficulty in recognizing the true

has described.

and

in

skull

is

flat

camp

Sarmatian type, whose

arch

traits

is

the

Petersen

the moustache and beard

cheeks free and display the prominent cheek-bone

prominent

the

there

and sloping, the hair wild and tangled,

one case brushed back from the forehead

leave the
ciliar

The

On

clearly recurs in the panels of the arch.

one hand, in the scene which shews two prisoners brought into
is

by the

titles

mouth wide open.

This

the super-

last characteristic

heightens the effect of violence and passion produced by the motions and
gesticulations of the figures

the motion specially noted by Petersen,

throwing back of the head and upward gaze,

the

figure nearest the


'

This

is

is

here found in

viz.,

the

Emperor.

not the place to discuss the source and vahie of the ajjocryphal letter of Marcus

relating the story of the miraculous thunderstorm (recently treated by Geffcken,

Neue Jahrbiicher

das klassische Alterthiim, 1899, 264 ff.)


but it may be observed that it shews some signs of
accurate knowledge, e.g. of the legions engaged {not including xii. Fulminata), and also of the
fi'tr

which the occurrence took place iv KotIpui MS., corrected to iv KoTivois for the
who, as V. Domaszewski shews, are to be placed on the upper course of the Gran, were
precisely tv rfi /xedopia KovaSooy nal Sapjuorwi/ (restored for the corrupt forms of the MS.) and came
in

district

KoTLvot,

into contact with the Imperial troops (Dio, 71, 12).


-

Von Domaszewski adds

Marcussaule,

106''),

all clearly refer to


*

the

iesUmony of

'm?,CYipUon^

{A/'ei/e I/t'/dt-//)ergt'rya/ird/i(/ier, v.

but those which he quotes as mentioning belhiin Gcniiaiiicii/n

the wars after 176, in which

Die Marciissimk, 46

Commodus was

ct

iigf.

SannatictDn

also engaged.

f.

British School at Rome.

The

258
It

equally clear that in the other two panels where barbarians are

is

represented

we

are to see the

the case of the relief in the

kneel before the

Emperor

whiskers short but

full,

German

type.

This

is

especially clear in

Palazzo dei Conservatori, when two barbarians


the

in

The high round

field.

skull, the

beard and

absence of

the regularity of the features, and

violence in expression or motion, leave no doubt as to the nationality


In the case of the panel from the arch we can draw a close
represented.

on the column

parallel with a scene

for the gesture of the father

submission with his son, or perhaps brings

makes

him

who

a hostage,

as

is

in scene xvii, which represents wholesale surrenders as taking

repeated

place immediately after the miraculous thunderstorm.

concerned are naturally of German

Here

also the tribes

nationality.

therefore led to suppose that the reliefs of the arch fell into two
with the belliim Germanicum and bellum Sarmatictim
corresponding
series
But it is clear that no inference can be drawn as to the
respectively.

We are

original order of the reliefs from that


position.

We

Germanicum we

which they occupy

however, that while in the case

find,

in their

the

of

present

bellum

have two panels, one of which represents the submission

field, while on the other are seen hostages brought


panel is devoted to the bellum Sarmaticum, and
one
into the camp, only
We may
that shews prisoners brought before the Emperor's tribunal.

enemy

of the

therefore

in

fairly

the

assume that a panel

is

missing which represented

the

This will raise


success of the Emperor against the Sarmatians in the field.
the number of panels to twelve, and it may be that this was the original
In that case, as

total.

entry of Marcus into

it

will

Rome

be shewn that the two scenes representing the

balance those on which his triumph

while the allocutio in castris has


lustratio

exercitus

and

allocutio

its

is

depicted,

counterpart in the congiarium, the

to the

field

army must be

distributed

between the two wars, unless we assume that the subjects were duplicated,
as

is

quite possible,

making the

total

number of panels

fourteen.

possible arrangement of the fourteen panels will be suggested below.

We
for

call

must now turn our attention to the panels which most urgently
explanation, viz., the two which represent the adventus Augusti in

As we have seen, at least four of the series (including three in the Palazzo dei Conservatori)
were not employed by Constantine in the decoration of his arch. Monaci {Bitll. Coinm. 1900,
from the order of
25 ff.) is not therefore justified in treating the series as complete and in arguing
'

the arch as original.

Notes on Roman Historical Sculptures.


Here the reliefs furnish
and topographical information.

us, as

successive stages.
historical

There

is

ADVENTUS

XXIX., No.

a coin of the year 174 (PI.

AUG., but, as

must belong

it is

Von Rohden

believe, with definite

which bears the legend

previous to the seventh saliitatio iniperatoi'ia,

to the earlier part of the year.

Rome

an actual return of the Emperor to


question.

6)

259

The evidence

of the coin as to

has, however, been

called in

Pauly-Wissowa's Realencyclopddie

in

2299)

(i.

expresses a doubt as to the fact of such a return having taken place, and
suggests that the coin proves merely that the hope and expectations of the

Emperor's

arrival in

Rome

He

existed.

calls attention to the

occurrence of

the legend Fort(una) Red(ux) on coins of 170 (Cohen, 205), which furnishes

no proof that Marcus returned to Italy

in that year.^

But there

difference between the issue of coins with the latter legend,

is

a great

which commonly

emperor, and that of a carefully

took place during the absence of an

dated type with Adventus Augusti, which was of rare occurrence and always

And above

denoted an actual entry of the princeps into Rome.^


representation on the coin coincides in

all,

the

so remarkable a manner with those

of the arch that no doubt can be possible as to their reference to the same
event, which,

it

is

hardly necessary to add, must clearly in the latter case

The

be one which actually took place.

coin shews a cortege consisting of

the Emperor, preceded by an aqiiilifer (representing the legions) and a


signifer of the guard,

and followed by Victory holding a wreath over

his

head, in the act of approaching a quadrifrontal arch or Janus surmounted

by a quadriga of elephants. Above the


building with windows, perhaps

2,

porticns,-a.\\di

with a flight of steps, before which

Now, the

cortege

we

see the upper storey of a

behind

it

a tetrastyle temple

an altar on which a

is

essential features of the scene

viz.,

fire

is

burning.

the quadrifrontal arch with

quadriga of elephants (through which we are to assume the cortege to pass)

and the tetrastyle temple


is

reclining figure,

roads
^

M.

recur

absent, but in the fourth

is

whose

personified.

left

It

is,

arm
I

in the panels of the arch.

panel
rests

we

see in front of the

on a wheel,

in

whom

The porticus
Emperor a

one of the great

believe, possible to identify

both arch and

The legend of the obverse is


3).
auventvs avg. imi'. vi. cos. hi.
temple to F'ortuna Redux at Ascoli in 172 (C.I.L. ix.

bronze medallion in the Cabinet des Medailles (Cohen,

ANTONiNVS

.\VG. TR. P. XXVIII, of the reverse

We may

add that the dedication of a


embodiment of a hope not destined to immediate fulfilment.
^ Parallel cases are those of Hadrian (Cohen, 91 f. [118 a.d.]) and Commodus (Cohen,
not 175, as Cohen states], and 3 [180 A.D.]).
[Adveii/its Caesaris, 176 A.D.
-

5177)

is

likewise the

S 2

i,

The

26o

School at Romk.

liRiTisii

Monaci believes that the entry of the Emperor took place by the
Via Appia, that the temple is that of Mars Extramuranus, and the arch
(in the first scene) that which is mentioned in mediaeval descriptions of

temple.

Rome, for is portam Appia ui ad tcmplmn Mart is ; while the arch in the
second scene is to be distinguished therefrom, and identified with the arch
of Lucius Verus

in

First Region.

the

In that case, however, the final

Marcus from the East by way of Brundisium ^ would be represented, whereas the two scenes clearly shew the termination of the bdlnm
return of

Germanicum and balance the triumphs depicted in the reliefs of the


In 174 the Emperor returned from the Danube
Palazzo dei Conservatori.
by the Via Flaminia, which must be the road represented in the second
This being the case, I feel no hesitation in identifying arch and
panel.
temple as those of Domitian and Fortuna Redux respectively.
The proximity of these monuments is attested by an epigram of Martial
(viii.

65), written in
'

which runs as follows

A.D.,

93

Hie ubi Fortunae Reducis fulgentia late


templa nitent, felix area nuper erat
hie stetit Arctoi

formonsus pulvere

belli

purpureum fundens Caesar ab ore iubar


comas et Candida cultu
Roma salutavit voce manuque ducem.
Grande loci meritum testantur et altera dona

hie lauru redimita

Stat sacer et domitis gentibus arcus ovat

hie

gemini currus numerant elephanta frequentem,


sufficit

Haec

est

immensis aureus ipse

digna

tuis,

10

iugis.

Germanice, porta triumphis

hos aditus urbem Martis habere decet.'

From

vv. ii, 12

TriiiDiphalis,

it

has been inferred that Domitian rebuilt the Porta

which was

in

the neighbourhood of the Circus Flaminius, but

means necessarily bear this sense.


On the other hand, the list oi arms triiimphales given in the mediaeval
descriptions contains one which spanned the Via Lata in the neighbourhood of S. Marco, and is not associated with the name of any emperor.

the words of Martial do not by any

This

is

the

recensions.

arciis

From

vianiis

carneae

of

the

Mirabilia

the thirteenth century onwards the


'

Vita

Mani,

27, 3.

and

name

its
is

various

explained

Notes on Roman Historical Sculptures.

261

by reference

to a legend connected with the persecution of Diocletian,

this led the

Anonymus Magliabecchianus

Arcus Diocletiani, whose


but of S. Maria

was

site

Via Lata.^

in

in the

to identify

wrongly with the

neighbourhood, not of

may

It

it

and

S.

Marco,

reasonably be conjectured that

the legend arose from the misinterpretation of the hand which so often

crowns the legionary sigmun.

Probably the part of the signum immehand was broken and the hand itself thus isolated.
The arcus uiamis carneac is also mentioned in the Ordo Benedicti'^ where

diately below the

the course of the procession from the Vatican to the Lateran

terms

in the following

Maraim

ante S.

The Vicus
S.

Marco,'*

Via Lata

'
:

in or

described

ascendit sub arcii nianus carneae.'

corresponds roughly with the modern Via di

Pallacinae

and the arch clearly stood

Now, the

is

ascendit per Pineain inxta Pallacinam et prosiliens

at the junction of this street with the

about the present Piazza di Venezia.

coins of Domitian represent various triumphal arches erected

by that Emperor,-* and

in

every case these

surmounted by quadrigae of elephants

One

x\3.mQjauusJ'

of these coins

is

the

dated 95

are of quadrifrontal

A.D.,

and

may

well reproduce

commemoration of the double triumph of 93

the arch erected in

the Suevi and Sarmatae, and

we add

if

to

form,

type known by the special

evidence

its

the

A. I),

over

testimony

of Martial that the arch erected in the neighbourhood of the temple of

Fortuna Redux was surmounted


obtain a conception exactly

Aurelian

by quadrigae of elephants, we shall


by the arch represented on the two

fulfilled

panels.''

Moreover, the temple represented to the

on the panel No.

end of

'

See note

Mabillon, AIns. Hal.

at

may be

III.,

left,

both on the coin No. 6 and

identified with that of P"ortuna

Redux,

built (as

this paper.
ii.

143

Jordan, Topographic,

Mgr. Duchesne has recently conjectured

ii.

664

ff.

Lanciani,

Mon. Live

i.

549

ft".

de PEcole fraufaise, xxiv. 485) that Benedict,


of St. Peter's, author of the Ordo Romanics, was also the compiler of the JMirabilia and wrote

Canon

under Innocent
in lioth

II.

(i1/tVa^^j-

therefore not surprising; to find the arch mentioned under the .same

It is

name

documents.

U.R.

'

Lanciani, F.

Cohen, 530 (cos

large bronzes.

PI.

21.

=85 a.d.), 531 (cosxvii. =95 a.d.), 672 (cos xv =90-91 a.d.).
XXIX. Figs. 1-3. The specimen given of the last (PI. XXIX. Fig. 3)
xi.

x\11

are

has the

reverse type incuse, in jjlace of the usual obverse.


''

It

speaks of
''

is
'

noteworthy that Suetonius,

(Dom. 13).
of the same arch

ianos arcusque

That two sides

elephants

recalling the

number

of arches erected by Domitian,

are represented on the successive panels

In accordance with the abbreviation practised by the

position of the wreath.


(/uadrii^ai' nf

in

'

is

shewn.

is

clear from the

artist,

only one of the

School at Rome.

Tin: I^kitisii

262

may

be inferred from the epigram of Martial referred to above)

neighbourhood of the arch which we have just


temple

one of Fortuna may,

is

representation of the pediment

on

That

identified.

think,

clearly

panel

III.,

in

the
this

be inferred from the

where Fortuna holding

patera and cornucopiae stands with wheel and cornucopiae on either side
of her.

It

in

nowise detracts from the probability of

that the temple

here tetrastyle, whereas

is

it

this identification

represented on coins as

is

hexastyle/ for the example of panel VII., where the temple of Jupiter

shew that the


sculptor considered himself justified in adopting an abbreviated method of
Moreover, in the relief Fortuna Redux
reproducing the temple-front.

Capitolinus

is

is

represented

as

tetrastyle,

is

sufficient

to

seen in person (with caduceus and cornucopiae) greeting the returning

Fmperor.
Finally, the coin (though not the reliefs)

shews between the temple


This

and arch what appears to be the upper storey of a porticus.


well be identical with that

the Vicus

of Jan.

6,

Benedict

and

Pallacinae,

known

to

may

have existed on the northern side of

referred to in the account of the great flood

856

A.D.,

preserved

1 11,"^

who

tells

in

the Liber Pontificalis by the biographer of

us that the flood

'

ascendit per platens ct vicos usque

regammans ingressus est per porticum qui est


Remains of the porticus in question
positus ante ecdesiam Sancti Marci'
came to light in 1705, when the inscription C.LL. vi. 1099 was discovered.

ad clknuii

As

argentarii ; exinde

Hiilsen

has

recently

shevvn,^

this

considerable building activity under

Rome was
who may

part of

Domitian,

the scene of

perhaps have

caused the porticus to be erected.

We may
as

therefore regard the entry of

amply confirmed by the

reliefs

Marcus

of the arch

into
;

and

Rome
it

early in 174

receives further

confirmation from the true interpretation of the scene X. in which an allocutio takes place with

interpreted

by Monaci

an architectural background.

'

It is
[

as an allocutio addressed

one of the permanent camps on the Danube.

one of the conventions of the


(Cohen, 3

scene has been

as an oratio priiicipis delivered in palatio before his

departure from Rome, and by von Domaszewski


to the praetorians in

The

artist to confine the

But

it is

use of the architectural

found on coins of Trebonianus Gallus (Cohen, 78), Trebonianus Gallus and Volusianus
= Gruber, Roman Medallions, PI. 46, 3], 78), and Volusianus (Cohen, 83).

Lib. Pont. ed. Duchesne,

Rom. Mitth. 1903,

Religion

cles

17

ii.

145.

ff..

roinischen Heeres, 6

f.

Notes on Roman Historical Sculi'TUREs.


background

to events

which take place

are represented, the tribunal

The event here

Rome

where scenes

held to be a sufficient indication.

is

Nor can we allow von Domaszewski's

Rome.

figure in a fringed saguni standing

He

correct.

nationality

we

believes that

recommended

same

position

immediately beneath the tribunal to be

are to see here a friendly prince of barbarian

to the troops

is

return

first

interpretation of the

by the Emperor.

the coin-types on which such allocutiones are represented


that the

in castris

depicted balances the congiariuni which followed the

triumph of the Emperor, and therefore took place after the

final

to

in

263

regularly occupied

by a

figure

comparison of

shews, however,

whom we

may,

body of

believe, identify as the trecenarius or centurion of that picked

who were always in immediate attendThey are represented, as I believe, on the

speculatores, the elite of the guard,

ance on the Emperor's person.

Antonine column- surrounding the tribunal ^.nd wearing a costume

Von Domaszewski may

with that of the figure on our panel.

(though

this

is

identical

also be right

not so certain) in identifying Mars as their special divinity.

His image appears amongst those carried by the signiferi together with
(common to the guard at large) and Hercules (associated

those of Victoria

with the equites singulares).


If then

we

are in presence of an allocutio addressed to the guard

\\\

Rome, the scene must be the Castra Praetoria, and the building which
forms the background the principia, which occupied the centre of the area.

This has never been thoroughly excavated, but remains of the building seem
to
is

have come to

light

both

the sixteenth century and in

in

overwhelmingly probable that such an

ning of the year 174, and that


the time of Hadrian onwards

it
it

Now

1827.'^

it

allocutio took place at the begin-

Erom

was an event of some importance.


was customary

for the

Emperor

to dismiss

the time-expired praetorians in every other year on or about Jan. 7th,* and
(COH.
The trecenarius is thus represented on several coins of Hadrian Cohen, 236
VRAETOR. ), 554, 560, 563, 565, 588 [allocutiones addressed to the armies of Moesia, Dacia, Spain,
Most instructive of all
Noricum, and Syria respectively), and Caracalla Cohen, i (adlocutio).
'

ft'.

a coin of Trajan (Cohen, 329) representing the submission of I'arthamosiris,


Emperor, while the trecenarius stands between them.

is

Scene

Ixii.

PI.

70

f.

The

lance

18, descendentein speculator iinpulsu

was the

special

weapon of

the speculatores

turbae lancea prope vulneravit

Claud.

35,

who
cf.

faces the

Suet. Galb.

neque convivia

^ Lanciani, F. U.R. Ii.


cum lanceis circunistarent.
Augustus primum imperium orbis terrarum auspicatus est,' C.I.L. xii. 4333
(Ara Narbonensis), cp. C.I.L. \.'^ p. 383. See Eph. Epi^r. iv. 317 ff. (Bormann). The allocutio
was not necessarily delivered on this day, e.g. in C.I.L. ix. 2995 = Dipl. xlvii. we have a case
dated May 6 in some year previous to the death of Verus.

inire ausus est nisi ut speculatores

'

Quo

die imp.

The

264

British School at Ro.mk.

owing to the grave danger of the


In 168,
situation, no dismissal of praetorians seems to have taken place.
however, at the ceremony which took place in castris {i.e. in Rome) on
Jan. 6th, Marcus delivered a speech in which he conferred privileges in the
and

In 166

to deliver an allocntio.

170,

matter of inheritance on time-expired praetorians.^

Emperor to Rome
as

relief

with which we are dealing furnishes,

we have

the alloaitio which

we may

Geruianicum, so

which was distributed


have an allusion to

followed the bellmn

identified

interpret the congiaviian (panel No. XI.) as that

after the final

Dio

this in

triumph of the Emperor

Ixxi. 32

= Petr.

Patr. Exc.

in

We

176.

who

Vat. 121),

the story that the plebs interrupted the Emperor's coniio with shouts

tells
'

therefore quite

is

believe, direct evidence of the fact.

Just as

of

and the

in 174,

It

ceremony took place on the return of the

natural to suppose that such a

octo^ in allusion to the years of

rewarded by
has

174, but

of continuous warfare had

Danube

in

169.

in
It

background

the

in

story

need not be unduly pressed, as eight years


fact elapsed since the departure of
is

is

Marcus

impossible to determine with certainty the

building in which the distribution takes place


that

The

been used as an argument against the historical character of the

in fact

Advcntus AugHSti o{
for the

Marcus' absence from Rome, and were

the distribution of eight aurei to each individual.

shewn the

Rostowzew

Porticus

Minucia

thinks
'

it

clear

with several

he supports his contention by reference to a tessera with the


on the reverse.^ I am unable, however, to see that a
Minucia
legend

offices

'

number of
at

Commodus
before May

i.e.

Ulpia, and
in

No

the

it

the

is

19, 175,*

and presided

in

relief,
is

distributed a congiarinm while

that

praetexta,

made

in

equally probable that the Basilica Ulpia

least

known

any way distinguished

offices are in

and consider

represented

still

person

it

is

wearing the toga


in

the I^asilica

quite likely that the distribution in the following year

same

it

was

place.

serious difficulty

presented by the two panels (VI., VII.)

is

in

the

Palazzo dei Conservator! representing the triumphal car of Marcus at the


entrance to the Capitol and the sacrifice before the temple of Jupiter
'

fragment of the oratio

Hollweg), 195- Pauly-Wissowa,


*
*

iv.

is

Marci

is

preserved in the Fraginenta I'aticana (ed. Bethmann-

879.

Piombi Altieri,
Commodus left Rome on
Clarrucci,

roitgianitm

(iivi

doubtless that

iii.

I.

The
19 for Germany, and assumed the ioga viri/is on July 7.
commemorated by coins of 175 with Lil\eralitas) /. (Cohen, 291-294).

May

Notes on Roman Historical Sculptures.

265

Capitolinus. Until these have been carefully cleaned and minutely


their details

lelism

especially as

regards restoration

For our present purpose

cussed.

it is

cannot

examined

be adequately dis-

observe that the paral-

sufficient to

between these panels and those which represent the AdvenUis Angusti

of 174 is unmistakable.
In the first scene the floating Victory appears in
both cases and the Emperor approaches an arch in the first case, as was

shewn, that of Domitian,

in the

the Clivus Capitolinus at

its

Redux on

second doubtless an arch which spanned

highest point

while

the temple of Fortuna

the one panel corresponds with a tetrastyle building perhaps to be

identified with the

scene there

temple of Jupiter Custos on the other.

In the second

only a general correspondence between the group of eqnites

is

singulares with their

t'^-.tv/A?,

the sacrificial group

in

the other hand there

is

together with the personified Via Flaminia, and

the panel of the Palazzo dei Conservatori

but on

an exact parallelism between the left-hand group,

comprising the figures of the Emperor, his elderly companion, the ideal
bearded figure who, to judge by analogy, must represent the Senate, and

who may perhaps be

another bearded figure of the same ideal type,

representative of the ordo eqiiester.

have hitherto refrained from assigning a name to the figure

who

is

in

in immediate attendance on the Emperor's person.


It is
assumed by Petersen, von Domaszewski, and others that the artist intended

every scene found

to represent Claudius Pompeianus, the

the husband

of Lucilla in

169.

It

Emperor's son-in-law, who became

is,

however, far from

that

certain

Pompeianus accompanied the Emperor throughout the bellum Gennankuvi


et SaruiaticuJii.

and had

was,

it

command

of a vexillatio and

and the numerous

Emperor,^^

Parthian war and these events

very outset.

But

true, legatits

is

Pannoniae superioris

to bear the brunt of the fighting before

in

167,^

Marcus himself took the

Moreover, he recognized the merit of Pertinax, promoted him to

field.-

the

He

it

in

is

Finally, he

made him

offices

make

it

held

secure

the favour of the

in

by Pertinax

between the

unlikely that they took place at the

was with the Emperor

at the

the last degree improbable that Marcus,

time of his

death.'^

who hastened on

the

marriage of Pompeianus with Lucilla before setting out for the seat of war

'

C.I.L.
Dio,

iii.

Dipl. xlvi.

Ixxi. 3,

who

is

surely anticipating events in coupling the

name

of Pertinax with that

Pompeianus.
3

Vita Pert.

2, 4.

]'ita Pert. I.e.

llerodian.

i.

6, 4.

The

266

British School at

was accompanied on the march by

in 169,

newly-married son-in-law.

his

Rome

clearly destined to remain in

Pompeianus was

Moreover,

representative.

R()>n-:.

as the

173 Pompeianus was consul ordinariiis, and

in

though doubtless he might have remained absent from

commenced on Jan. i with


Rome. I do not, therefore,
but rather that we are to see

whom that

believe that
in

Pompeianus

as consul

whom various anecdotes are told by Cassius


whose lack of early education often made
it

here represented,

\\\&praefectus praetorio,

viz.,

Marcus, of

at the court of

Bassaeus was

Dio.^

2l

parvenu

itself painfully evident.

his cursus honorum, preserved in the inscription set

Marcus and Commodus,^

is

the Emperor's constant attendant the only

position properly belonged,

case M. Bassaeus Rufus, a well-known figure

in this

Rome

would have been impossible for the consul whose duties


functions which necessitated his presence in

snffectns, this

person to

Emperor's

up

in

his

From

honour by

way upwards from

appears that he worked his

the centurionate through provincial procuratorships to the great prefectures

promotion from the praefectura Aegypti to the praefcctura praetorii

his

took place after Aug. 29, 168, as

and on the death of Macrinius

The

which

distinctions

above shews that he received the highest

to

referred

inscription

military

is shewn by papyri recently discovered,-^


Vindex in 172 he became sole prefect.

it

was

in

the

Emperor's power to bestow,

together with the consularia ornanienta, and was honoured with a statua

Forum

arinata in the

Antoninus

know
trial

Pius,

of Trajan, a statua civili

and a statua

loricata in the

that he

was

in

in

coin-types than the representation of

bearded figure of our

Ixxi. 5

(iii.

C.I.L.

vi.

B.G.U. 902

The number
Vit.

Soph.

that Claudius

fact

Pompeianus was advanced

in

See Festschrift fiir Otto Hirschfeld, pp. 123


of statues exceeds that of those granted to Vitrasius Polho,

f.

tit".

marriage of the Emperor,

praefectus praetorio

256, Boissevain).

p.

"

\\\q.

the place occupied by the

in

1599.

''

We.

on the occasion of adlocutiones, congiaria, or

reliefs,''

The

other ceremonies.

Ultor.'*

standing immediately behind the Emperor,

'

the temple of

at

of Herodes Atticus given

commoner

in

Sirmium in 175, from the account of the


by Philostratus ^ nor can it be doubted
Nothing is
constant attendance on the Emperor's person.

was with Marcus

that he

aniictii

temple of Mars

who was

II, p.

ii.

also highly distinguished in these

68 K.

few examples from Cohen

will suffice

(ialba,

ff.

Trajan, 324-329

Marcus,
565, 910, 930; Antoninus Pius, 149, 489 f., 501, 531
Connnodus, 293 fF. Caracalla, i, 127 Sejitimius Sevcrus, 300.
;

a connexion by
campaigns {C.I.L. vi. 1540).

f.,

75, 409,

Hadrian, 236

427

\'erus,

ft'.,

f.

Notes on Roman Historical Sculptures.


years

no conclusive argument

forms

favour

in

of

the

267
identification

makes it more than


the features of the
while
age,
middle
than
more
likely that he too was of
Emperor's companion exactly suit the rough soldier of humble origin and
proposed by Petersen

the length of Bassaeus' career

do not in my opinion betoken the Eastern origin of Claudius Pompeianus.^


The two companions of Trajan constantly represented on his column
have been identified with Claudius Livianus, praefectus praetorio, and
Licinius Sura, Trajan's chief staff-officer

represented,

it

can

but where one

alone

officer

the pmefectus praetorio

hardly be doubted that

is
is

intended.

This leads

from our

me

to

reliefs are,

mention a further point


I

believe,

belong to the frontier


war.

It runs as follows

the field force was composed.

how

us

Its

in

the other troops invariably fight under vexilla

The army

therefore no accident that

Emperor

therefore
all

entirety at the seat of

its

On

the other hand,

of vexillationes

known

It is

to us as comites of the

an

are praefecti praetorio and praepositi vexillationibus, even


episUilis Latinisf

all

eagles and manipular signa

consisted

the officers

'

Only the guard, which did not

army, was assembled

signa are therefore always in evidence.

never appear.

has based

on the Antonine column only


The column shews

fact that

praetorian signa are represented.

historical deductions

Von Domaszewski

admissible.

an ingenious argument on the

which

in

commands

while the normal

for

general

official

ab

officers,

the legati pro praetore and legatilegionis, are entirely wanting.'

Von

Pertinax,

Domaszewski's statements are indeed open


example, seems to have been legatiis legionis priniae on the occasion of the
miraculous rain. But the whole argument falls to the ground at once when
to criticisms of detail.

for

we observe

that an eagle

and a manipular signiun are represented beside the

praetorian signiun and vexilla on panel No. VIII., while a praetorian signiun
is

flanked by two manipular signa on No.

here to

discuss

the

somewhat

It

II.

difficult

therefore unnecessary

is

question

whether

the

signa

represented on the column are always those of the guards, further than to

observe that the presence of the Imperial imago

No.

is

the only certain

test,

as

shews that under Marcus coronae as well as plialcrae were among the

II.

graiidaevits, Vila Marci, 20, 6.

^
*

genere Antiochensi, Vita Marci, I.e.


The reference is of course to Tarrutenius Paternus.

Nciie Heidelberger Jahrhilcher,

v. (1895), p.

121

cf.

Die

Marcitssatile, p. 107.

268

'J'liK

School at Rome.

J^RiTisii

constituents of manipular sigiia

and

am

not sure that in scene

second sigmiin does not consist of covonae and phalerae


4.

to

two

It

order

the

certaint}'

in

still

extant beloni^

with the bellinn Gennaniaun

corresponding

and although

and

bclliun

no longer possible to determine with

is

it

the

only.

has thus been shewn that the eleven panels

series,

Sariiiatu'iiin

ix.^

which they were originally

placed,

it

may be

regarded as certain that each series adorned one front of the arch from

which they were removed.


reliefs

also natural to suppose that eight of the

It is

now do

decorated the Attic of the Arch, as they

that of the arch of

Now,

Constantine, two being placed on either side of the inscription.


to be noted that the

Emperor

where the enemy appear, as well as


I

in

existence

thus disposed

is

those of the Advcntits and triumph.

therefore suggest that these panels, together with that,

we were

it

faces to the spectators right in all the scenes

now

lost,

whose

obliged to assume to complete the Sarmatic series, were

Germ.

III

IJnscr.

IJ_|

Adv.

Oerni. II

IV

Adv.

II

and on the other front

:V|

Jostj

Inscr.

VI

VII
|
j

Sarni.

Sarm.

There remain four other


allocutid)

reliefs,

might belong to either

series,

between the sides

may have

like the other

may

Triumph

each

lustratio

either

two scenes,

These

war.

latter
;

have also been distributed


their direction

is

different

been duplicated, appearing on both fronts on the

may

and

sides of the attic

'CiXQ

of the arch beside the spandrils (or above the side bays

Their directions

II

while of the others {allociitw in

should be disposed to place conjecturally on

while the lustratio and allonitio

or they

two of which (the

and congiarmm) one follows

castris praetoj'iis
reliefs

Triumph

II

then have been convergent.

if

pillars

such existed).

This must, however,

remain a matter of guesswork.^


'

'-

Brogi.

Die Marciissaulf, I'l. i6a [praetorians to the Emperor's r., leyionaries to his 1.].
Plates XXIII. -XXX'III. are from photographs by Anderson.
Fig. 4 is from a negative by
Casts of the coins reproduced in PI. XXIX. 1-4, 6 were kindly furnished by M. de Foville

of the BibHotheque Natinnale.

Notes on R(jman Historical Sculptures.

269

Additional Note,
The annexed

assumed

table shews the various forms

the successive

in

recensions of the Mirabilia by that portion of the hst of arciLs triumphales

which follows the

line of the

The

Via Flaminia and Via Lata.

text

is

given after Urlichs, Codex TopograpJiicus Urbis Roinae.

Graphia aurea
URBIS RoMAE.

Desckiptio plenaria

Tonus

URBIS.

xn.)

(Cent,

I.

(Cent. XIII.)

Sanctum Lau-

De mirabilibus

Anoxvmus

URBIS Romae.

Magliabecchianus.

(Cent.

XIV.)

(Cent.

arcus
triumphalis
Octaviani ad Sane-

est arcus triumphalis

triumphat.
arcus
Octaviani iuxta S.
Laurenliuni in Lu-

Octaviani.

cina.

Lucina.

iuxta

renlium

I.

Lucina

in

tum Laurentium

in

I.
'

XV.)

arcus tropholi triumphalis .... qui est


iuxta sanctum Lau-

rentium in Lucina,
etc.

2.

prope

Antonini

arcus

Anto-

arcus

arcus
marmoreus
triumphalis qui dicitur de Tosectis.

columpnam

prope

nini.

modo

eius,

ubi

turris

de Tosectis.

est

litterae aliquales

et

de

suo epitaphio
sunt in eo, sed sine
constructione.

3.

deinde est arcus ad

3.

deinde

prope

est

3.

^Nlarcum
qui vocatur manus
carnea.

ad

arcus

Sanctum

arcus
Diocletiani
triumphalis, ubi dici-

Marcum

arcus qui nunc vocatur ad manus carnea

Sanctum

manus

qui vocatur
carnea.

tur

ad Scum. Marcum.
Tempore quo Dio-

Carrili

prope

Sanctum Marcum.
[legend follows]

cletianus. etc.
[legend follows]

4.

in Capitolio
panis aurei.

arcus

4.

arcus aureus in Capi-

4.

tello.

in Capitolio est arcus


panis aurei.

'

4.

arcus

....

panis

aurei

in Capitolino

monte.

'

The

first

of the four arches here enumerated

Portogallo, destroyed in 1662,


is

that from which, as

attic of the
is

fixed

to

shew

is

conjectured (see above,

Arch of Constantine were removed.

by the mention of
(p.

261),

is

S.

is

the so-called Arco di

which need not here concern

Marco.

It is

p. 252),

The

us.

The

last

the panels of the

position of the third

the arch which, as

have

tried

represented on the coin of Domitian and the panels

Thk

2/0
Nos.

III.,

Arms

IV.

It is

British School at Rome.

obvious that the

Anonymus Magliabecchianus

calls

it

manns

Diocletiani solely because the mediaeval legend explained the

carnea by reference to an event connected with Diocletian's persecution


of the Church.

somewhat more

question arises with regard to the second

difficult

of the arches mentioned.

In considering

it, it

is

necessary to take into

account

{a)
p. 239),

De

passage of Poggio,

which runs as follows

Duo

'

varietate Fortiinae (ap.

Urlichs, op.

cit.

sunt insuper (arcus) Via Flaminia, titulo in altero penitus

deleto, in altero corrupto

superextant,

alterius

antiquae caelaturae

et

nomen (perpaucae enim litterae


tabulae quaedam e marmore,

quas saepe miror insaniam demolientium effugisse) penitus obsolevit.'

The statement

{b)

of

Andrea

Fulvio, Antiqiiitates Urbis

Romae

(1527)

60

iv. p.

Fuerunt

'

et alii arcus sive fornices

quorum duo

aetate

mea

diruti

unus iuxta plateam Sciarrae, via quaeducit ad porticum Antonini


cuius adhuc extant ornamenta quaedam marmorea, alter iuxta S.

sunt,
Pii,

Mariam

in

in

renovatione proximi

eius

nuper vidimus cum

Via Lata, ab Innocentio octavo

templi dirutus, cuius

ornamenta marmorea

trophaeis barbaricis

baud dubie posteriorum esse imperatorum ex

ornatu apparet.'

Taking

these documents in conjunction,

all

following conclusions

The two

{a)

we

are,

think, led to the

arches which Poggio mentions as existing in his time on

the line of the Via Flaminia must be identical with those whose destruction
Innocent VIII (in 1491,
is recorded as taking place, in the one case under
see Infessura [ed. Tommasini], p. 268), in the other in

1662.

(The arch

mentioned by Fulvio, iuxta plateam Sciarrae,' will be one of the arches of


the Aqua Virgo between the Piazza Sciarra and S. Ignazio.)
'

{b)

arch destroyed by Innocent VIII

The

rio-htly,

Curiosnm

in

and probably
by the Notitia and

generally,

the Vllth region (Via Lata) and ascribed to Diocletian

chronologist of A.D. 354


{c)

is

identified with the arcus novus mentioned

The

so-called

b)'

the

in the Mirabilia,

but

(Mommsen, Chronica Minora,

Arco di Portogallo

the arch near S. Maria in Via Lata

is

is

mentioned

omitted.

It

i.

144).

was indeed supposed by

Notes on Roman Historical Sculptures.

271

Anotiymus Magliabecchianus, who was almost contemporary with


Poggio, to be identical with the arcus qui dicitiir de Tosectis, and he

the

added the statement (confirmed by Poggio) that a few letters of


But he was mistaken in supposing that
still be read.
this was the arch ubi modo est Uirris de Tosectis, for S. Maria in Via Lata
cannot be described ^.sprope coluinnam {Antonini), nor, as it appears, was the

therefore
its

inscription could

The members

residence of the Tosetti in that neighbourhood.

family are always described as de regionc Cohivinae

and

Sig.

Tomassetti (whose authority

in

mediaeval documents/

such a question

in

of this

of the highest)

is

states that their palace appears to have stood at the S.W. corner of the

Piazza Colonna at the beginning of the Via de' Bergamaschi.

In that case

monumental archway at the S.W.


which surrounded the column of M. Aurelius, spanning

the arcus de Tosectis must have been a

corner of the /^r///i-

the street which led thence in the direction of the Pantheon, and
least doubtful if

it

at

is

which Hiilsen {Bull. Coniin. 1895,


the arcus Diocletiani deserves a

p.

46, note i) believes to

more minute

Hulsen argues from the

hitherto received.

Medici (Matz-Duhn, 3525)


have come from

in Villa

should be noted that the relief

It

it

should be described as a triumphal arch.

investigation than

fact that the inscription

it

has

VOTIS x

ET XX which may be read on the shield represented in the relief appears to


be identical with that mentioned by Marliani ( Topographia [ed. 1 534], p. 36)
prope aedem S. Mariae in Via Lata nunc inulta eruuntur marmora, in quibus
1

'

tropliaea triumpJialesque

qualem
case,

and

esse in arcu Constantini

but

it is

which
due

imagines vidi cum hac inscriptione

it

difficult to

may

teste

dictum

est

must be remembered that the


say

how much

be a mere fragment.

of it

Mr.

is

supra!
relief as

This

is

votis

very probably the

we now see

it is

?i

pasticcio,

contemporary with the inscription,

Wace

suggests that the Pallada con

oi the Delia Valle inventory (Michaelis, Jahrbuch, 1891,

No. 69), which cannot otherwise be accounted


been incorporated

in

the relief

et xx,

for satisfactorily,-

p.

231,

may have

Certainly none of the figures belong to the

period of Diocletian in style, while the fragments of the airus Diocletiani


were, according to Fulvio, unmistakably of late date.
^

my

fF.
311-313, which the Rev. H. M. Bannister kindly consulled on
Via Lata is not in the regioiie of Colonna.
Michaelis' proposal to identify it with a relief in the Louvre (Clarac-Reinach, 90, i) has

E.g. Cod. Ottob. 2553,

behalf.
-

S.

Maria

nothing to recommend

in

ii.

PAPERS OF THE BRITISH SCHOOL AT ROME


Vol. hi.

No.

FRAGMENTS OF

ROMAN HISTORICAL RELIEFS


IN

THE

LATERAN AND VATICAN MUSEUMS


HY
A.

J.

B.

WAGE,

Fclhmi of Pembroke

M.A.

College, Canibridi^e

LOxMDON:

1905

FRAGMENTS OF ROMAN HISTORICAL RELIEFS


LATERAN AND VATICAN MUSEUMS.
The

by Wickhoff^ upon Roman Art have been

expressed

views

THE

IN

monuments whose Roman origin was


has approved the shadow theory and explained it in

widely accepted, as far as concerns

undoubted.

own

his

Riegl

Petersen

peculiar art dialect.

such effect as practically to destroy

main principle

VVickhoft"'s

'

'

in

those of the Flavian period.

alone has combated

all

and with

which

belief in this theory,

Roman

the appreciation of

it

is

especially

reliefs,

Since the relief fragments to be discussed

paper are attributed to the Flavian period,

this

it

in

necessary to state

is

Wickhoff's views, and their refutation.

Wickhoff remarks^ that the

artist of the Ai'a

Pacts who, he considers,

broke with Greek tradition and made a new departure


'allowed the figures
cast their

in

high

relief

shadows on a back row of

relief

in

style,

of the front row [of the procession] to


figures,

which were worked so

flat

on

the ground that they could no longer cast any shadows, but stood like
silhouettes against the sky.'
fell

'

When the shadows of the

on them and they themselves cast no shadow, the

that their

shadow
frieze

row of figures
was created

illusion

on the earth behind them, and thus the background

fell

This theory he works out

vanished behind them.'

Telephus

front

Pergamum, whose high

from

relief

contrast to the

in

would cast heavy

shadows, and which therefore, he concludes, must have stood under a

On

colonnade.
'

would

ally chapters

express

my

refer
II.

the other hand he considers the reliefs of the arch of Titus,

throughout

and

III.

this

hearty thanks to Mr. Stuart Jones

kind help and encouragement.


Ara Pads Augustae, p. 157,
"^

Op.

paper to the following works

cit.

Wickhoff,

Roman

Riegl, Spcitrbmische Kiinstiiidusti-ie, chapter II.


:

it is

hard to say

how much

this

Art, especi-

desire

also

to

paper owes to his

2.

pp. 74, 78.

School at

TiiK Hritisii

2/6

Ro.mk.

which as regards shadows shew the same treatment as the


stand

the open air unroofed.

in

to

on an entire misconception and an incomplete understancHng of the

rests

The Telephus frieze according to the latest research stood in


The reliefs of the arch of Titus are covered by a vault, and

monuments.
the open

air.

as they face one another the effect of the sunlight on

No

Am Pads,

Petersen briefly shews that this theory-

them

one who has seen the arch of Titus can have

grotesque shadows the figures

is

never equal.

failed to

notice the

high relief cast over the background and

in

over one another, when the sunlight penetrates below the vault from the
east in

and from the west

the morning,

Pads was

a square building

east sides of

So here

it.

Again, the Aj-a

at evening.

the processional frieze was on the west and

also

it

was physically impossible

on both sides to have been equal

any length of

for

for the

time.

shadows

Under

these

circumstances the shadow theory must be definitely abandoned.


Similarly Petersen shews the incorrectness of Wickhofif's theory that
the arch of Titus reliefs

whose

relief,' in

frieze of the

manner

One

worked

contrast to the

'

the stone style out of blocks,

in

upper and lower edges,

clay model

Ara Pads was worked

'

limits the

style of the Ai^a

out of blocks

in

Pads.

exactly the same

as the reliefs of the arch of Titus.

by Wickhoff

characteristic attributed

illusionism.

It

peculiar feature in
all

are

original surface, preserved at the

depth of the

The

'

is

to Flavian art remains true

no small achievement to point out a marked and

monuments

that have long been well known.

And

of

Wickhoff's book no part better repays a close study than the suggestive

chapters in which he examines the illusionism of Flavian

becomes necessary

for us to

examine

detail* the

in

art.

But

it

extant monuments of

the Flavian and Trajanic period, since the theories that previously held
the field have been found wanting.

Amongst Roman
art are the

arch,
71,

historical reliefs the only extant

two triumphal

reliefs in

which was decreed to Titus by the Senate

was not complete

Between

of Domitian.
period there
reliefs

at his death,

is

this arch

specimens of Flavian

the archway of the arch of Titus.


after his

and was finished early


and the

This

Jewish triumph

in

in the principate

historical reliefs of the Trajanic

a considerable space of time, to which as yet no historical

have been assigned.

The space

is

indeed considerable, since the

extant monuments of the Trajanic period date rather from the end than

from the beginning of his principate.

The

battle scenes

on the arch of

Fragments of Roman Historical Reliefs.


Constantine, which probably

came from Trajan's forum, cannot be

than 112, and the arch of Beneventum was finished in the

Trajan

if

not in the

first

Forum

frieze of the

277

last

Therefore, with the exception of the

of Hadrian.

Transitoriiim and the plutei in the forum, which are

probably early Trajanic (and these are not exactly great historical
there are

no

historical reliefs to illustrate the progress of that art

death of Titus to the


it

is

remembered

earlier

year of

last

that

This

years of Trajan.

Domitian was very active

is

the

reliefs),

from the

more strange when

in building.

He

not only

rebuilt the parts devastated by the fire of Titus, but under him the
Temples of Vespasian and Titus, and of the Gens Flavin, and the
Porticus Divoruiii were erected and the Forum Transitorium was begun.

had a passion

Besides, Suetonius especially remarks that he

triumphal

arches.

It

is

considering

strange,

Domitian, that no fragments of any of his

the

many

for erecting

building activity of

buildings have survived.

Dio Cassius indeed says that his arches were destroyed after his death.
But Mr. Stuart Jones has shewn that one of his arches w^as not destroyed.^
of Marcus Aurelius, since it is shewn on the
It existed at the time
and it was probably the
Aurelian panels on the arch of Constantine
same arch as that known in the middle ages as the arms manus carneae.
Under these circumstances it would be quite reasonable to expect to find
in Roman museums fragments of reliefs belonging to the period of
Domitian. Such fragments I believe I have found, and by means of
them, after proving their Flavian style, I hope to be able to illustrate the
above-mentioned gap in our knowledge of the development of Roman
;

historical reliefs.

In the

first

some of the

place

stylistic

it

will

be necessary to examine somewhat closely

and technical

details of the arch of Titus

and that

at

Beneventum, with the object of pointing out the difterences between them.
In the arch of Titus-

which the

relief is

the ankles of the figures.

on the spectator

is

it is

to be first

worked join

The

remarked that the blocks out of

vertically

and

The

space composition which Wickhoff observes

by the open ground above the


V.

above

that of two views of two different parts of a procession

seen in an ideal or imaginary frame.

also horizontally just

general impression produced by the reliefs

page 261.

qualities
in

However,

figures.

Wickhoff,

of

'

Respiration

'

and

these reliefs are produced


as Riegl has pointed out,

op. cit. Figs. 29, 30.

The British School at Rome.

278
this

open ground

from necessity.

and the

is

///////

free will, but

obliged to represent Titus in the triumphal car

temple above the heads of the procession as they


This obviously necessitated an open ground above the

spoils of the

actually appeared.
figures

own

introduced by the artist not of his

He was

on the one

by

borne

relief

it is

On

camilli.

well occupied, apart from the spoils,

the other relief

is

it

by the

occupied, apart from

the figure of Titus crowned by Victoria, only by the fasces of the lictors

but this comparative emptiness of the rest of the ground only serves to
attract

more

To

attention to the figure of the triumphing Emperor.

however.

to details,

that one lictor, the

the triumphal car scene

In
first

on the

left,

wears a

full,

several of the lictors, too, have short whiskers.

is

it

to

turn

be observed

rather close-cut beard

Their heads are

all

on the

same scale (i2-'i4m. high). The bar above the eyes is well marked on all.
The modelling of their faces is somewhat exaggerated in the heads in low
relief: but they are all fresh, clear-cut, and lifelike; there is no unnatural
hardness or dryness in the rendering.
The naturalism of these heads
can be compared to the best Flavian portraits. The composition itself
is well balanced and not crowded.
The only fault to be noticed consists
this has been
in the relative positions of the horses and the triumphal car
The horses
rightly commented on by Wickhofif as a fault of perspective.
:

appear obliquely, one overlapping the other, as though viewed from their
left front.

flank.

four

In direct contrast to them, the car appears behind on their right

In justice to the artist,

horses

and

the

car

must be admitted that the subject of the

it

exceedingly

is

procession as actually seen the

difficult

to

In the

handle.

horses should appear directly behind one

another, and the car should be in the front line and on the

same plane

as

This would have been an ugly composition, and therefore,

the horses.

we must recognize at once the fault of the artist and the difficulty
The
of his subject, we must also praise the excellence of the composition.
monotony of the procession is well broken by the two lictors, who turn
round and look backwards by the attitude of Roma, who looks back at
the Emperor she guides, and of the three figures in the front line, that turn
while

towards the spectator.


very noticeable.

In the drapery

drill is freely used.

in

In the actual

The

drill is

workmanship the use of the

and the

used

in

the decoration

man

of the car

is

reins of the horses the running

also used in the wreaths of the lictors

the olive-branch held by the booted

been

drill

in front

and

the

of

Roma

wings

and

of

it

and
has

Victoria.

Fragments of Roman Historical Reliefs.


Occasional traces of

279

are to be seen in the hair of the bearded man,

it

and

on some of the other heads.


In the scene of the spoils of the temple the
is

By

again well broken.

one of the

and turns round

figures halts

monotony of the procession

the table of shewbread, as noticed by Wickhoff,

golden candlestick a figure

toga

in

to look

introduced, wearing a curious

is

arrangement of straps round the upper part of his body


important

official,

since his

Just behind the

back.

presence reduces the

he must be some

number of

porters at the

hind part of the ferciihnii of the candlestick to three instead of the usual

And

four.

The

the last figure of

finally,

is

practically facing the spectator.

and heads of the porters are more damaged than those of the
In
on the other scene, but shew the same general treatment.

faces

lictors

making the heads of the


raniilli

is

caniilli,

heads,

we have

the

appear above those

in

in front,

The

Trajanic period.
in

and

that they are

Beneventum)

appear above the

rest of the

what later became a convention in Roman


making the heads of the figures that stand behind

heads one above the other

appears

carry the tituli

trace of

first

This consists

reliefs.

who

from their long hair and effeminate appearance (similar

clear

camilli occur on the arch of

it

all

and so

first

drill is

on.

became

This practice of placing rows of


fully developed, as

used as freely

in

it

scene as

this

seems,
in

in

the

the other

the drapery, in the wreaths, in the hair especially of the

and of the arched


continued on the
imagines
was
Wickhoff
This arched gateway

central cainillus, in the ornamentation of the candlestick

gateway.

ground

in paint

this

is

impossible, since the titulus stands in the way.

Riegl rightly points out that

it is

the ancient artist's conventional

rendering a perspective effect that a modern

artist

way

would do by

of

fore-

Also, had the artist placed the arch at right angles to the

shortening.
procession, as

it

would actually appear, the

result

would have been hideous.

Finally, as regards the general style of both scenes,

the variations from high relief to

medium and low

it

may

relief

be remarked that

and

vice versa are

Also the clear cutting and somewhat exaggerated


excellently combined.
modelling of individual features of the figures in very low relief makes
them appear as though almost in medium relief Most noticeable is the
modelling of the eye.

In shape

it

is

usually long and narrow, but in the

which are unfortunately the only ones well preserved, it


somewhat shorter, and rather deep at the corners. This throws

low-relief heads,
is,

as a rule,

out the eyeball, and

assists, in

conjunction with the modelling of the face

TnK

28o
mentioned,

just

British School at Rome.

making the head stand out

in

as though in

much

higher

relief.

Turning now
which

above, earlier than

are, as said

years later than the arch of Titus,


style

in

and execution.

In

find at

means correspond
one scene,

Above we

it

there

treatment

In

is

its

Again, the

The

two and sometimes

the beginning

forest of legs

of this

we

noticed

which do not by any


instead of showing

frieze,

figures, especially

hard, dry

far

is

is

style.

'

faces and other

characteristic of

clear naturalism of the Flavian school

a hard,

rather

feeling for

less

continuous

'

their

This

rendering.

The fresh,
place we have

and there

see

the beginning of Wickhoff's

Trajanic portraits also.

has gone.

thirt)'

up into groups and incidents which cannot be


is

modelling of the

In the actual
parts,

below a

to the heads above.

broken

is

contemporaneous

nude

and

about

and dramatic.^

wild, tumultuous,

is

three rows of heads one over the other

on the arch of Titus

to say,

is

once considerable differences

Dacian battle scenes on the arch of

crowded close together.

are

lo A.D., that

we

the

Constantine the composition


figures

none of

to the historical reliefs of the Trajanic period,

wooden sharpness of

The handling

texture.

is

not so sympathetic and individual, but depends rather on a fixed type.

The continuous
are

all

style

is

employed on Trajan's column

also

represented by groups.

rows of heads one above the other.the

drill is

and

folds

very noticeable.
fringes.

It

is

to

It is

In

clearly to be seen in the drapery, in

use

Its

also plain for rendering

is

on armour, boots, helmets and the

much undercut by

the

drill,

be entirely drill-worked.

of Titus, but

it is

we

the scenes

used for working the thicker parts of the

especially on the Dacians.


tion

we observe in many cases three


both these monuments the use of

Further,

so

much

We

Lastly,

like.

so that in

some

cases

have noted the use of the

ornamenta-

foliage

all

it

drill

its

hair,

may

very

is

be said

on the arch

not by any means so great as in these Trajanic

reliefs.

same elements of execution and composition


repeated and developed in the latest Trajanic monument, the arch at
Heneventum.^ The crowded composition, the group treatment, and the free
use of the drill are obvious in the two scenes on either side of the archway.
Further,

find all the

In the reliefs on the piers of both faces of the arch

'

-'

Wickhoff,
V.

op. lit., Fig.

op. lit.. Figs.

attica the

group

A.

Cichoi-ius, Trajansciiik, Plates

Wickhoff,

and of the

35-40.

XI, XVII,

XVHI, XXXIII, LXI, LXII, LXXVII.


F'ragments of Roman Historical Reliefs.
composition

is

even more striking.

It

has become,

in

281

almost a panel

fact,

we see fully developed under Hadrian and the Antonine


The grouping of the Emperor with ideal personifications
can be exactly paralleled by some of the Aurelian panels on the arch
of Constantine (Pis. XXIV, XXVI), and by a panel probably of the time
The free use of the
of Antoninus Pius in the Palazzo dei Conservator!.
treatment, such as

emperors.

drill

again

is

The

obvious.

crowded arrangement of

close,

figures

is

unmistakable.

There are some cases of one row of heads appearing above another,
It may be that this is due to the fact that the
but they are not frequent.

was obliged by exigencies of space

artist

However,

if

we examine

to

make

the panels less

tall.

the Hadrianic panels in the Palazzo dei Conser-

and the Antonine and Aurelian panels already referred to, it will
be seen that there is never more than one row of heads. Therefore we
must assume that this convention of two or more rows of heads reached its
height under Trajan, was dying out at the end of his principate, and

vatori

'

successors, probably because, though

became extinct under

his

the group treatment,

did not suit the panel treatment.

find

it

specimens of
difference of

historical

Domitian or

reliefs

it is

is

made

clear as
It is

now

much from

I.

i.

p.

reliefs

this

in

the artistic as

propose to

period.

Roman

from the

illustrate in part the

These fragments are as

Museo Chiaramonti, 152; Amelung,

Vatican,
409,

pi.

Height, "63

43.

relief

length, "98.

Cat. d. Vat.

This

is

Museums,

a fragment of a

representing part of a procession proceeding to the right.

shews the bodies and lower part of the faces of two male figures

relief to the

of

always shewn

triumphal
It

is

necessary to describe and discuss the

fragments already mentioned, by which

development of such

2i

we

often rendered en face.

hope, the gap in our knowledge of the development of


reliefs

chronological standpoint.

follows

Since then

while on the arch of Titus the eye

on the Trajanic

in profile,

Thus,

either to

it

all is that,

suited

we must therefore assign all


The last and greatest
Trajan.

beginning on the arch of Titus

it

it

right

both hold with their

ferculuiii resting

of the fercu/nm itself


1

left

on small cushions on their


is

visible

Helbig-, 562.

behind

low

hands the horizontal pole


left

shoulders.

the left-hand figure.


-^

in

Helbig-, 564, 565.

The body
With

their

The British School at Rome.

282

hand they hold staves with pecuh'ar crescent-shaped handles exactly


by the porters of ih^ fercu/a on the arch of Titus

right

similar to those carried

The
in

left-hand figure wears a short, curly beard.

low

relief are

high reliefj'but

Before these two figures

obvious traces of two similar figures

now broken away.

existence of these two others

is

front of

in

Apart from the broken

them

in

surface, the

proved by the other horizontal pole of the

clearly traceable from the left to the right,

where its
end coincides with a broken support, against which, no doubt, rested the
left hand of the foremost porter.
All remains of the drapery of the

ferculuvi

line

its

two broken

is

figures exactly

agree with

This

this.

would

then,

relief,

correspond to the four porters carrying the front end of the ferculum, on

which

indeed striking.

is

drapery are

drill-cut

the pole

the

is

of the fcrculum.
possible to

come from
1

A.D.

in

same

in

The

believe

In both reliefs the deep folds of the

both the rendering of the hands clasped round

both also there

the

same

the two

In that case

the arch of Vespasian and Titus.

by the senate

in

is

so strong that

Chiaramonti fragment

subject.

it

least

till

This arch was dedicated

honour of the Jewish triumph, and stood

served us

2.

102

\}i\&

forma

Anonymus

existed at

Einsiedlensis has pre-

inscription.^

its

Vatican, Cortile del Belvedere, 88

Braun,

It

in

at the

appears from

It

nrbis to have had three archways.

the thirteenth century, and the

is

of another

part

is

it

would possibly have

end of the Circus Maximus towards the Celian.


fragment of

body

a blank space below the

is

likeness between

that

representation of the

The resemblance

the table of shewbread, of the arch of Titus.

is

between the two

308, No. 53

p.

Helbig-, 163

Beschreihing d. Stadt Rom.

ii.

Pistolesi,
2, p.

155.

iv.

pi.

Height

of original, 95 length, no; relief height, 16; height of faces, "13 (Fig. i).
The relief has been much restored as follows a vertical strip on the right,
;

including two lictors and the second horse


all

in

downwards

the feet and legs from the knees

high

relief

on the

left,

nose and mouth of the

its

staff

helmet are

the heads of the two

the noses of the two horses on the

lictor

above them

small fragments on the drapery of

and

the whole lower part, including

Roma

the greater part of the vexillum,

original.
Richler, Topogr.

d.

men

and the

the head, breast, forearms, and

But her back hair and the lower part of the

'

left,

Stadt Rom.

p.

177.

crest of the

283

Fragments of Roman Historical Reliefs.


This
figures

shews part of a triumphal procession, since all the


First on the left we have a male figure clad
wreaths.

relief clearly

wear

laurel

an ordinary sleeve tunic turned half round to the right; he is clearly


Above him appears a male
looking back at the procession behind him.

in

figure in profile to the left carrying a hasta

Yw,.

Next

relief.

in

high

very low
left.

is

a lictor's

relief are

head

in

low

two horses ridden

is

Roma

clad

in

in

high

I.

relief; also to the left, following


b}'

him,

two men whose heads appear

relief just in front of the vcxillum.

Next

both these figures are

in

All these are in profile to the

a cJiiton with a diplois, both girt in together

TiiK British

284

below the breasts

just

over

School at Rome.

she wears a cloak fastened on her right

it

She advances to the left, but looks back to the right at the
in her left hand she holds
Emperor, whose triumph she is guiding
lictors' heads in medium or
three
more
are
a vexilhivi.
Following her
very low relief, all facing to the left. Then comes the head and neck of a
shoulder.

by the

horse, which, to judge

(piadriga carrying the victorious Emperor.

Two
the

of the horses of the

collar, is clearly the first

The

points, however, are clear.

relief

Here the relief breaks off.


extended no further either to

or above the heads of the figures, because on both these sides

left

there are clear traces of an edge curving sharply outwards.

extended further to the

And assuming

right.

that the other three horses

and the car occupied the same amount of space as


the arch of Titus, this relief must in
a

composition as large as

that.

however,

It,

in the similar

scene of

original state have formed part of

its

Therefore

it

in all

probability decorated

one side of the archway of a similar monument.


In composition

we have

In both
in

both there

both the

is

lictors

resemblance to the arch of Titus

its

Roma

guiding the triumphal car of the Emperor

The

figures are

in

two rows one above the other instead of all


this, however, I have already remarked
Also as regards the heads

of the lictors the principle of isocephaly

And

since there

hair in

its

car.

One

foreheads

is

in

observed.
figures, the

is

rendered

in

the

less

but

in addition in the

the modelling of

feeling for

style, then,

it

Belvedere fragment

is

as

Belvedere fragment there

texture.

the

The

drill

is

freely

the drapery, on the horses' heads, and in the lictors' wreaths.

general

The

notice.

same manner

faces, the
more exaggeration
less free and natural, and rather harder and more dry.
in

is

and

Similarly also the modelling of the bar on the

very marked

words, there

other

same printhe representation of the Emperor in the

curling strands

on the arch of Titus.

is

in the

of the riders

two other technical points deserve

or

long, stiffly

is

no open space above the

is

must have been observed

triumphal

is

riders.

the beginning of

scene of the arch of Titus.

ciple

more crowded

The heads are


being on the same

together owing to the introduction of the two

level

in

In the Belvedere relief there are

occupy the background.

however several important developments.


arranged

very striking.

is

head of the procession a figure that looks back

at the

would not be unreasonable

somewhat

later

to

rendering
In

other

used for

From

its

assume that the

than the arch of Titus.

It

is

also

Fragments of Roman Historical Reliefs.

285

we have

For, though

considerably earlier than the arch of Beneventum.

here the two rows of heads and a crowded composition

two ridden horses are not seen

to this, the hind quarters of the

owing

for instance,

still

it

shews the processional rather than the group composition so typical of


Trajanic art as in the arch of Beneventum and the battle frieze on the

However,

arch of Constantine.

rendering of the faces the Belvedere

in the

fragment shews some of the characteristic rendering of Trajanic

The

eyes are purely Flavian

profile.

When

shorter and

the

head

they are long and narrow

is

eye

very low relief the

in

deeper cut at the corners to

make

portraits.

shape, and in

in

is

somewhat

the eyeball project

little.

3.

Fragments

A. [PL
Height, -39

XXX,
;

in the

Fig.

Lateran Museum.

Museum number,

I.]

length, '33

thickness,

515

Benndorf-Schoene, 266.

-23.

shews a beardless male head rather over life-size (height of face


Behind the head on the left
profile, in high relief to the right.

20),

It

in

profiled border,

and also the edge on that side

that the relief

ended

On

there.

is

smooth

is

these facts prove

the three other sides there are merely

(-ii m.), so much so that the head is


the cheeks fat and
neck is thick
The
practically in three-quarter
The mouth is firm, but droops a little at
broad, but carefully modelled.
The chin is strong and hard,
the corners, and the lips are thin and tight.
and oblong but the throat is loose and fat. The nose is decidedly aquiline.
The eyes are set deep beneath a heavy, overhanging brow. The

rough breakages.

The

relief is

high

profile.

forehead

is

high and furrowed.

In shape the eyes are long and ellipsoid,

the lids and inner corners being very carefully rendered.

whisker before each

ear.

The

hair

is

long and wavy, and

strands curving forwards over the brow

and where they stand high

all

style.

All

is

real

and

lifelike.

wide

drill.

The

face wears an

and indicates a vigorous man, rather

The execution

rendered with

the delicate modulations of the surface

most

in rather

the lines of the face

curve downwards slightly against the background.

and natural

a short

the ends are placed irregularly,

xAnother technical point deserves mention, that

inclined, however, to self-indulgence.

is

forehead were undercut by the

off the

expression of intense determination

There

is

perfect in

a fine feeling for texture


;

and as a

portrait the

its

free

and
head

for
is

The

286

XXX,

B. [PI.

Height,

"31

male head

Fig.

in

high

Museum number,

2.]

length, '41

British School at Rome.

Benndorf-Schoene, 258.

The head

profile to the right.

in

relief ('iS)

502

This fragment shews a bearded

thickness, 225.

about

is

The edge on the left is smooth, but on the


The chin and cheeks are covered by a
whiskers,
and
upper lip by a small moustache. The
beard
and
the
short
cheeks are high and narrow the mouth is rather long, and the lips slightly
parted. The chin is rather pointed, but firm. The nose is aquiline, but well
shaped. The eyes are ellipsoid and have rather projecting lids the pupil
The eyebrows are plastically rendered
is rendered by a shallow semicircle.
life-size

(height of face '205).

other three sides roughly broken.

and the brow overhangs the eyes against the nose, but over their outer
corners curves upwards from them, the space between them and the eyelids
being

filled

The

hair,

and

in

by a heavy

which

long,

is

roll

The forehead

of flesh.

high and recedes a

is

rather thin just over the forehead,

sweeping curls that

object which hangs over the

left

fringe of a cloak such as those

four ridges appearing high

drapery, must belong to

lie

flat

and

shoulder

is

worn by the

probable that they are fasces

in

The

disorder.

in

inexplicable unless
speciilatores

up on the same shoulder,

the next person

somewhat

is

in

front

that case this

and

if

head

and though

it

it

eye and the

left

corner of the

is little

there are slight traces of the

head and

are

drill.

worked very

it

noticed.

mouth and the other


out

is

it

/ictor

character
that of a

in

Lastly,

it

higher

relief.

As

in

A, the

lines of the face

curve downwards slightly against the background, which in

inwards against the face to throw

seems more

official.

Here again one or two technical points must be


left

There

the

The

in close attend-

has a certain air of distinction,

functionary rather than of an important

is

it

lictors.

they are folds of

but

proxiums, such as appears bearded and with a fringed cloak

in the

rope-like

person would be a

ance on the Emperor on the arch of Beneventum.

little.

coarse,

its

Also

turn slopes
in the hair

remains to note that both this

carefully right to the actual point of contact

with the background.

As

rightly remarked by Benndorf and Schoene, both these heads are of


same marble, and correspond exactly in size, style, and execution.
They are both parts of one and the same relief, which in all probability
belonged to a triumphal arch or some similar monument. To these two
fragments I would add four others also in the Lateran, which shew some of
the heads of a procession of lictors.
These, though not of the same size.

the

Fragments of Roman Historical Reliefs.

287
the

same

558; Benndorf-Schoene,

292</.

inferior in

execution, are nevertheless worked

style and marble.

them

XXX,

Fig.

and somewhat

C.

[PI.

Height, '19

length,

brief description of

"2

Museum number,

3.]
1

height of face,

relief height, "13;

in

follows.

12.

The thickness

of the block cannot be ascertained, since this fragment has broken edges

round except on top where there

smooth surface

to join

The cheeks

left.

The

are lean, dry, and wrinkled.

furrowed, and there are crowsfeet at the corners of the eyes

The mouth

brows are rendered.


long and

narrow, the upper

hair

is in tight,

claw-shaped locks, roughly blocked out.

D.

XXX,

[PI.

Length, -30

Fig.

The

Museum number,

z].]

height, '32

relief height, -lo

"12.

there

a dowel hole at the

is

left

The eyes
The

Benndorf-Schoene,

545.

thickness of block, -16

surfaces at the top, the back,

of faces,

the eye-

being especially prominent.

are

lid

in

forehead

small and pinched together.

is

all

on to another

This fragment shews part of a bald, beardless male head

block above.
profile to the
is

is

and on the

end of the upper

left

surface.

are

292(^.

height

smooth

These

facts

obviously prove that the block to which this fragment belonged joined on to

Also the two heads are cut

others on which the relief was continued.

fragment we see on the right a beardless male head


on the

left

half a similar head en face

another head
strongly

high relief

in

marked upper

lids.

but somewhat more loosely.

knob of
with the

that

broken

is

hair behind
drill.

It

it

left

in

each head a bar above the eyes.

was probably female,

and the traces of

its

to

judge by the

having been worked

Roma or Vicof the Roma on

looked to the right, and probably was a

way

toria leading the

between and below these was

is

off in front

on the

this

the right,

The eyes are narrow and ellipsoid, with


The hair is rendered as in the last fragment,
The eyebrows are not rendered but the

foreheads are furrowed, and there

The head

in profile to

off flat

On

with the edge and so clearly continued on the next block above.

for the

Emperor.

If,

the arch of Titus, she looked back at him,

whole procession was moving to the

left.

as in the case

we can

at

once decide that the

This seems to shew that here we

have traces of two rows of heads one above the other.


E.

[PI.

XXX,

Fig.

5.]

Museum number,

549

Benndorf-Schoene,

292*:.

Length '31; height, "245; relief height, "085; thickness, 13; height of
faces, '12.
The edges on top, at the back, and on the right are smooth, and
at the right-hand

end of the top surface

is

a dowel hole.

So

as regards

TiiK British

288

block also the relief extended

this

School at Romk.
The

the right and above.

itself further to

heads too are cut off above as in D. This fragment shews two beardless
male heads. That on the right is in three-quarter profile to the right. The

neck and part of the shoulders are also preserved the man carries V\\<t fasces
on his shoulder, and so is a lictor. His chin is prominent and dimpled his
mouth is small and pouts. The forehead is wrinkled with a marked bar.
:

The

left

eye

and oval

is flat,

long and narrow

shape, and deep

in

set,

the right eye projects and

whereas the other

This

shallow.

is

small

is

is

clearly a trick of the relief technique to make the eye on which the light
Similarly
against the ground.
fell appear the same as that in the shadow

the
the sinking above the collar-bone is rather deeply cut to disguise
also
is
the
left
on
head
The
ground.
flattening of the shoulder against the

on
that of a lictor, since the figure to which it belongs also carries fasces
slightly
to
turned
is
but
en
practically
face,
is
head
The
the left shoulder.
the

left.

There are short whiskers on the cheeks

and the forehead

is

furrowed and has a marked bar. The left eye is rather long and narrow
and deep set against the nose the right eye is short and ellipsoid, and the
brow curves down heavily over its outer corner. This peculiar treatment
;

same purpose

of the eyes was clearly done for the


in

the

In

head.

other

both

the

hair

is

as already

rendered

as

on

remarked
other

the

fragments.

F. (Fig.

Museum number, 544

2).

45; height, -23; thickness, -195

Benndorf-Schoene,

relief height, -09

Length,

292^-.

height of face,

-12.

The

is cut off
surface at the back and the top edge are smooth, and the head
broken.
roughly
are
edges
The other
flat above, so the relief continued.

On

the right

and on the
left

we

left

shoulder.

see the neck

and shoulders of a

lictor

turned to the

left,

the head and shoulders of another carrying \\\q fasces on his


In the hair, which is rendered as in the other fragments, are

faint traces of colour.

The

face has been

worked over

in

modern

times, in

made
an attempt to clean the fragment, and
that
observe
on its style. In the neck of the lictor on the right we may
sinews of
the artist has exaggerated the recesses between the bones and
therefore no remarks can be

the neck to deepen the shadows and

make what

is

really

low

relief

appear

to be in high relief.

shew a very close relationship to the work of


That there was an open space above the heads of the

In style these fragments


the arch of Titus.

Fragments ok Roman Historual Relikfs.


fii^ures

here also

is

proved by the existence of another block above.

horizontal junction of the slabs above the heads of the figures

compared

to the arch of Titus

The treatment

289

is

The
to be

where the slabs join just above the ankles.

of the drapery and the use of the drill are similar in both.

heads of the Lateran fragments we find a very elaborate


treatment of the eye, which is not present in the existing low-relief heads
of the arch of Titus, but which probably was paralleled by the now
In the high-relief

destroyed high-relief heads of that monument.

Fic.

There can be
remains of

monument.

relief

The

little

doubt,

think, that these six

decoration of a triumphal arch or


lictors {D,

escorting the Emperor.

It

fragments are the

some

similar historical

E, F) certainly formed part of the procession


cannot, however, have been a triumph, or the

would have been wreathed with laurel as on the arch of Titus.


Also, although the Roma {D) seems to be turned to the right, yet the
majority of the lictors (we have six out of twelve) are turned to the right,
and for that reason it seems more probable that the procession was moving

lictors

The

290
to the right.

No two

British School at Rome.

of the fragments

unknown, so that

totally

is

it

fit

and

together,

provenance

their

The

have portions of two processions from the same monument.


of the bald-headed

The two

clear.

man {C)

is

we

quite possible that in these fragments

relation

is by no means
by the carefulness of the work,

to the rest of the procession

large heads {A, B), to judge

have belonged to a group immediately surrounding the Emperor.


They probably from their size did not belong to a procession, but to a
large group such as is seen on the arch of Domitian, on his coins, and on

seem

to

The bearded man

the arch of Trajan at Beneventum.


speculator or lictor proxinuis

and

duty would require

his

unbearded man {A^

one of the amici

is

his

low rank would explain

He

the arch of Constantine.

to

hunt
the

why he

bearded,

is

The

probably

person of distinction,

is the same courtier who


some of the round medallions on

Apparently also he

caesaris.

appears as the Emperor's companion

lion

probably a

is

on the Emperor.

his close attendance

without doubt some

{B)

and perhaps too

is

in the

in

clearly recognizable in the scene of the

bear hunt

also he bears

Emperor's companion present at the

Heracles, but cannot be identified with

him

(Pis.

some resemblance
to

sacrifices

Apollo and

XXI-XXH). He does not

however appear on the arch of Trajan at Beneventum. He cannot therefore


have been one of the coniites of Trajan during the latter part of his reign.

Another point

to

remark

is

that on the medallions he seems to be older

than on the Lateran fragment.

It will

be clear that

by comparison with undoubted Flavian


that period,

we should have

out

this portrait

shewn

portraits be

could

to be also of

further evidence for the Flavian date

propose

Crowfoot has collected several Flavian portraits and

for these fragments.

pointed

if

the characteristics of their style.^

list

of

them

will

be

convenient.

Florence;

Uffizi, 319.

Amelung,

(2) Florence;

Uffizi, 321.

Amelung,

(i)

/^w/^r^r, 144.
^/. ^/V.

149

eyes rendered

close-

cut beard.
(3)

Rome;

(4)

Unpublished;

dei

Pal.

Conservatori,

monument

of

C.

Helius.

Julius

Helbig2, 605.

found

in

1887

in

the

Vico

now ?
(5)

Copenhagen

Jacobsen collection, 493.


^

J.H.S. 1900,

p. 31, Pis. I., II., III.

Trionfale

where


Fragments of Roman Historical Reliefs.
Vatican

(6)

Braccio Nuovo, 97a

To

Lateran, ^jy.

these

would add the following additional portraits

Vatican, Sala dei Busti, 360

(9)

eyes rendered.

Female portrait from Haterii monument.^


Male portrait from Haterii monument.-

(7) Lateran, 675.


(8)

291

eyes rendered.

(10) Vatican, Sala dei Busti, 350

eyes rendered.

(11) Vatican, Mus. Chiaramonti, 35.

eyes rendered.

(12)

54

(13)

.'

60.

(14)

"

253; Titus.

(15)

,,

560; close-cut beard.

(16)

722

Braccio Nuovo, 26

(17)

(18)

(19)

'.

"

69.
129.

Flavius Eucarpus.

(20) Capitol, Sala delle Colombe,

(21)

108.

(22)

,.

Sala degli Imperatori, 6

eyes rendered.

Titus.

eyes rendered.

(23) Rome, Magazzino Archeologico (fourth room,


(24)

Rome, Museo

These are not

all

Terme, Court, B

delle

in corner)

Helbig-, 1085

Titus.

Vespasian.

Rome, but merely the

the extant Flavian portraits in

best specimens.
In

these portraits

all

we can

clearly see the characteristics of Flavian

The

portraiture according to Crowfoot's analysis.

unpretentious

He

seizes

and represents a

they give a

is

is

single,

momentary expression of

characteristic.

by

portrait

characteristic expression

There

is

simple and

the artist tries to give the illusion of a living, natural man.

but an expression that


busts

style

is

This

illusionist

is

his subject,

the peculiarity of Flavian

methods.

caught and represented

in

momentary

a living atmosphere.

no laboured detailed modelling which produces an exact

facial

in the Capitol, Sala delle Colombe 95, the


J.H.S. 1901, p. 221, PI. XV, and the silver bust
from Boscoreale (from a phiale) in the British Museum, inscribed Antonia, wife of Drusus, mother
of Germanicus, and assigned by Heron de Villefosse to the Neronian period, Moji. Piot. v. p. 46,
1

Cf.

for hairdress

the unbroken

Flavian group at Chatsworth,

Flavian bust

Furtwiingler,

F"igs. 8, 9.
-

Benndorf-Schoene, 343, 345

Helbig", 694, 695.


The

292

British School at Rome.

likeness but gives no breath of

to

life

its

Flavian portraits are

creations.

natural and instantaneous, as opposed to artificial studio work.

This

style,

determined by an examination of the portraits mentioned, we can


It is a living
at once recognize in the head on the Lateran fragment A.
man rendered by a momentary expression which characterizes him

which

is

perfectly, as

wonderful
the

in

have

It

hard to decide which

is

expression, or the marvellous

atmosphere.

And

skill

it

them

their

relief

is

fragments connected

are also Flavian.

Being thus

now endeavour

satisfied as to the Flavian date of these fragments,

to arrange

ment of Roman

We

that gave

so there can be no possible doubt that this

Flavian portrait, and therefore that the other

with

most

is

the trained eye that knew when to catch

these Flavian artists,

momentary

living

tried to shew.

can

reliefs

sum up

them chronologically and

illustrate the

we must
develop-

from them.

the above discussed stylistic differences between the

arch of Titus and the Trajanic sculptures briefly as follows

Trajanic Reliefs.

Arc/i of Tihis.
(i)

Processional treatment.

(i)

(2)

One row

(2)

(occasionally two

Group treatment.
At least two rows of heads.

rows) of heads.
(3)

(4)

(5)

Drill used in moderation.

(3) Drill

Open composition.
Eye in profile.

(4)
(5)

(6) Fresh, individual naturalism.

The fragments must

(6)

therefore be

used very

freely.

Crowded composition.
Eye en face.
Hard, wooden treatment.

arranged to

illustrate as nearly as

possible the gradual transition from the Flavian to the Trajanic technique.

The Chiaramonti fragment which was conjectured


Vespasian and Titus must be placed
of Titus, 79-81

A.D., since

It

first.

to belong to the arch of

would date from the reign

the arch was completed and dedicated in his last

Next must come the reliefs of the arch of Titus, which was
dedicated after his death, as shewn by the inscription DIVO TITO, probabl}-

year.

in

the

first

or second year of

so closely allied in

contemporary.

Domitian.

The Lateran fragments

are

style to the arch of Titus that they might even be

They cannot be

at least

many

years later; and

it

would


Fragments of Roman Historical Reliefs.
probably be safe to conclude that they are not

Domitian celebrated
shews us a

this

campaign

(PI.

XXIX,

But since the

i).

Lastly comes the Belvedere

doubt belonged to a triumphal arch.


an arch

On

monument

probably belonged to another

reliefs

about that time.

set

up

to

when

coin dated 85 A.u.^

lictors arc

wreathed the fragments cannot represent a triumphal procession.


the

A.D.,

Janus crowned by two quadrigae, which probably

triun:iphal

commemorated

than 83

later

over the Chatti.

his victories

293

commemorate

coins dated 90-91 (PI.

relief,

up by Domitian

set

which almost without

would suggest that

not

Therefore

it

belonged to

the Chattic and Dacian triumph of 89 A.D.-

XXIX,

3)

we

see a triumplial Janus decorated

with quadrigae on top, and at the sides with statues, and round and oblong
But, since the relief was probably as long as the reliefs of the arch

reliefs.^

of Titus,

it

cannot have belonged to a Janus, but to an ordinary arch.

Where this arch


so many arches.
cussed

stood

We

it

is

impossible to conjecture, since Domitian set up

thus obtain the following dates for the reliefs dis-

Chiaramonti fragment.

A.D. 79-81.

8i-82(?).

After

They

also

Arch of

Titus.

83.

Lateran fragments.

89.

Belvedere fragment.

thus illustrate the changes of style indicated.

of Titus and the Lateran fragment?

mere indications of a second row of heads


proposed

is

correct, the

Also

in

it

arranged

but,

if

the conjecture above

Lateran fragments give us also the

of the group treatment of the scenes.

crowded composition, but

still

earliest

example

The Belvedere fragment shews

not so crowded as

in

some Trajanic

reliefs.

the heads are placed one above the other, but are not definitely
in

rows as

in

the Trajanic

reliefs.

think

it

is

assume so much from these fragments although they are so


they are Flavian

have no doubt

disclose the stylistic peculiarities

'

In the arch

we have open composition and only

allowable to
small.

That

and since they on close examination

and differences already described, they

Cohen'-, 530.

and the other dates of Domitian's reign v. Gsell, Essat siir Ic ngne de Doinitieii,
This relief might also have come from a monument celebrating the
end of the Suevic-Sarmatian war in 93 A.D.
i\ supra, p. 261, cf. a coin dated 95, Cohen', 531
^

For

this

pp. 184, 198, 226-228, etc.

(PI.

XXIX,
*

2).

Cohen', 672.

The

294

British School at Rome.

attempting to trace the development of


If we add to these the medallions from the arch of ConstanFlavian art.
tine and their kindred reliefs which, as Mr. Stuart-Jones conjectures,
probably belonged to the Templum Gentis Flaviae} we have a well-defined

may

be legitimately used

and progressive

in

series of Flavian historical reliefs.

V.

pp. 22() scqq.

Pis.

XXI-XXII.

PAPERS OF THE BRITISH SCHOOL AT ROME


Vol.

III.

No. 4

SOME

DRAWINGS FROM THE ANTIQUE


ATTRIBUTED TO PISANELLO
BY
G. F.

HILL, M.A.

LONDON:

1905

SOME DRAWINGS FROM THE ANTIQUE ATTRIBUTED


TO PISANELLO.
A

ascribed to Pisanello, both in the

CERTAIN number of the drawings

Recueil Vallardi in the Louvre and elsewhere, are copies, more or less

of antique originals.^

among
on

fol.

the authenticity of

others, as to

justified in

free,

The doubts whith have been expressed, by Courajod


some of

these drawings are fully

Thus we

the case of those which reproduce ancient coins.

have,

12. no. 2266 v of the Recueil Vallardi, a coin with the head of

Augustus wearing

PATER,

crown,

radiate

DIVVS AVGVSTVS

inscribed

and a head of young Heracles

in a lion's skin,

Similar in style and on paper

from a tetradrachm of Alexander the Great.

with the same watermark (a triple mount) are four coins


of Augustus

(?)

a lion's skin

doubtless taken

a radiate head of Augustus

a laureate head

a head of young Heracles in

These have no serious

and a bearded head of Heracles.

claim to be called the work of Pisanello, and the heads of Severina (Fig.

and Aurelian

(fol.

97 no. 2591, 98 no. 2592

Equally

lettering of the former, however, belongs to the time of Pisanello.

coarse in style, and unworthy of the


2593, Fig.

As

2).

copied from a

artist, is

the treatment of

relief,

the

a head of Hadrian

tie

i)

The

are equally doubtful.

99 no.
shows,
it is
wreath
of the
(fol.

probably on a coin which was somewhat worn

for

the drawing does not show the short curly hair on the forehead characteristic

of the Emperor.

collection'^ a

signed

Finally,

we have on

PISANVS HOC OPVS,

and

perhaps genuine.

is

only extant instance of a copy of a coin


nificant that
^

it is

not treated

in

have discussed these drawings

present paper the

made by

a medallic manner.
briefly in

my volume

Pisanello

This

is

The

sheet

is

If so,

it is

the

and

it is

sig-

one of the

on Pisanello, pp. 20

ff.

facts
In

the

views there expressed are modified in the sense that some of the drawings

previously accepted as I'isanello's


-

a sheet in the His de la Salle

head of Faustina the Elder under a gothic arch.

now

regard as works of a pupil.

Both de Tauzia, Notice des Dessins de

la Coll.

His de

la Salle, no. 8i.

The

298

British School at

Ro.ml:.

which disprove the attempt to show that the first master of the modern
medal was inspired by ancient coins.
But if the drawings from ancient coins assigned to him must, with one
possible exception, be discredited, there remains an interesting series of

SEVERIIC^E-TlVGyS

Fig.

From

I.

Hi:.\i)

studies from the antique, mostly

merit and attraction.


it

is

oi-

Skvkrina.

the Recueil Vallardi (Louvre).

made

in

Rome, which have considerable

In the case of those illustrated here,

not possible to attribute them to Pisanello

visited

risanello
it

was

in

Rome, working

again for any length of time

at St.

John Lateran,

is doul>lfiil.

in

it

is

true that

himself; but they at any

1431 and 1432.

Whether he ever


Some Drawincs krom thk Antique.
rate belong to his school

and

to his time.

igg

Thus, as documents for the

history of the originals from which they are copied, their value

lessened

by any doubt

Fig.

From

copy

is

not

as to their exact attribution.

2.

Head ok Hadrian.

the Recueil Yallardi (Louvre)

pass over those of which the originals have been identified, such as the
at

Milan of one of the Dioscuri of the Ouirinal.

an exquisite drawing, of undoubted authenticity, which

Nor can
is

illustrate

preserved

in

the

The British School at Rome.

300

University Galleries at Oxford, and will eventually appear in Mr. Sidney

studies

the recto are costume

on the verso, two pen-and-ink sketches of Bacchanals, probablj' from

One

a sarcophagus.
a

On

Oxford drawings.

Colvin's publication of the

tympanum

of them moves to the right, looking back, and playing

held before her

the other, also to the right, has her head

thrown up and her hands raised above


These, though slight, are

in

some ways

playing the same instrument.^

it,

quite the best of Pisanello's studies

of the kind.

On

the verso of the Berlin sheet 1359- (PI.

XXXI.,

Fig. i)

of a recumbent river-god holding a decorated cornucopiae.

is

the figure

The treatment

of the cornucopiae and the attitude in general prove that this

nothing

is

than the well-known Tiber (Fig. 3) which forms a pendant to the Nile
on the Piazza of the Capitol, although I can find no recognition in print

else

of this somewhat obvious


evidently

not

fact.

connected with

Under the
it,

is

suggested by an Eros torturing a butterfly


figure of a putto leaning

arm of the

right

figure,

a sketch of a small boy

on a knotted

and

staff

on the same sheet

probably from

but

possibl}'
is

an Eros or

Hypnos with inverted torch.


The Tiber, as is well known, was once a Tigris,^ and had under its
right arm a tiger, instead of the present wolf and twins.
Originally with
the Nile on Monte Cavallo, it was transferred to the Capitol between
and somewhat later, probably between 1565 and 1568,
513 and 1527
the attribute was altered.
The Heemskerck drawing (1533-1536) pub1

lished

that
it

by Michaelis shows that the

its

It will

merely to the selection of the

in fairly

good condition, so

be noticed that

in

in

making

artist.

his treatment of the

head of the river-god the

has not been restrained by any desire to reproduce the character of

Compare

v\ilh ihe

former such figures as are found

the dal Pozzo drawings in the British


latter, dal
"^

was

omission on our drawing was not due to any difficulty

out, but

artist

tiger

d.

in Clarac,

(Dept. of Or. and

ii.

PI.

Rom.

CXXVH,

no. 421, or in

Ant.),

57

fol.

with the

But the correspondences are not exact.


preuss. Kimslsannnl. ii. p. xxxxv.
This and the other Berlin drawing to be men-

Pozzo,

Jakrb.

Museum

fol.

58.

Museum,
M. Hind {UArte 1905, pp. 210 f ). Apart from general resemblances
of style, compare the right hand of the Tiber-statue with those of the standing figure {UArte
and the hands of the figures in
1905, p. 211) and of the St. Anthony (Hill, Ftsanello, PI. 43)
the boar-hunt (PI. XXXI., Fig. 2) with that of the figure holding an eagle {VArte 1905, p. 210).
* See Michaelis, Rom. Mitth. 1891,
cp. Lanciani, Ruins
1898, pp. 254 f.
pp. 26, 33, 61
and Excavations, p. 296.
tioned presently are probably from the same hand as the two drawings in the British
recently published by Mr. A.

Some
the antique

same

UKA\viN(is

attitude towards the


PI.

XXXI.,

model

Fig.

XXXII.).

no. 2397. v, PI.

As

'

is

The

betrayed by two other drawings, one at

the other in the Recueil Vallardi


latter

(fol.

194,

contains three figures, which have

mythological subject

'

or

'

allegory after the

a matter of fact the three figures are borrowed from three

Fu;.

works of

composition

2),

The

usually been described as a

different

^oi

subject and pose alone seem to have interested him.

]kTlin (1358,

antique.'

from the Antique.

may

art

;. Thk Tibkr-Statue ok the CArnoL.

whether they were meant

be doubted.

On

the right

is

to

be regarded as a

a Hercules grasping a club

in an impossibly ineffective way, which suggests that the original has been
misunderstood. And in fact it is taken from an Orestes on a sarcophagus,

possibly that which until recently was in the Palazzo Giustiniani, and of
'

Probably from the same hand as the two Berlin <lrawings.


The

302

which Raphael made

British School at Rome.

The reproduction

Husillos near Palencia.^


latter will

make

sarcophagus now

use, or else the

On

this clear.

Fig.

From

is

This

is

5).-

middle of the sixteenth century

The

another century or more.

(PI.

XXXI.,

the

in

have

Fig. 2) has been

Campo Santo

between the two


points out
the

that

Venus from the Adonis sarcophagus


known to have been at Rome in the

our drawing takes

third

There

at Pisa.^

the

original

figure

is

The

is

are,

to

Berlin drawing

however, important differences

whom

submitted

much more probably

true,

divergences

doubts,

The group
'

There

are,

in
is
it

out of the two mutilated huntsmen behind the boar

he has made a single


opposite direction

5).

my

be found

to

same Adonis sarcophagus as supplied the Venus.

reproduced for comparison from the PigJiianus (Fig.


is

history back

its

also evidently from the

described as a copy from a sarcophagus

and Prof Robert,

(After Robert.)

identify the original.

to

failed

is

Orp:stes.

4.

the sheet

arm of Orestes

free to restore the figure as Hercules.

the Sarcophagus at Husillos.

The middle figure in


now at Mantua (Fig.

antique, but

here given (Fig. 4) from the

the original the right

broken away, so that the copyist was

the Cathedral at

in

figure,

but

the Pighiantis, which

still
is

and he has turned the attacking dog

without the

restorations,

C. Robert, Sarkophap-eliefs, vol.

'^

Robert, vol.

iii.

in the

the agreement, especially with the drawing of

no. 20, PI. V,

ii.

is

nos. 156, 157, PI.


'

so great, that the


LV.

Lasinio, PI. 109.


SoMK Drawings irom thl
identity appears to

me

to

be assured.'

Anti()ue.

303

The drawing, having been

assigned

to Pisanello himself, has

been regarded as additional evidence of his con-

nexion with

that connexion

ment

Pisa.

that he

I^ut

worked and died

Fig.

'

Lives,'

is

omitted

iti

there,

back to the

first

In

in

the

the second, and the other

drawing were by Pisanello,


at Pisa.

ver}' doubtful.
first

Vasari's stateedition of the

5.
Adonis Sarcophagus at Mantca.
From the Pighianus. (After Robert.)

direction will not bear examination.^

worked

is

made

it

Now we

see that even

would be no evidence

any case the history of

this

half of the fifteenth centurv.

llill,

Pisanello, p. 5.

evidence

in

in
if

the

same

the Berlin

favour of his having

sarcophagus also

is

taken

PAPERS OF THE BRITISH SCHOOL AT ROME


Vol.

III.

xNo.

A PORTRAIT OF PYTHAGORAS
HV

KATHARINE

A.

LONDON:

McDOWALL

1905

A PORTRAIT OF PYTHAGORAS.
The

numerous

fairly

have come down to


inscriptions

Homer and

ideal portraits of

the Sages which

and the yet more numerous headless herms whose


to the frequency of such works in antiquity,
witness
bear
us,

may

naturally suggest that others

more famous

rulers

exist in our

museums

representing the

and philosophers of the sixth century, among

the most interesting and important

is

From

Pythagoras.

whom

the Renaissance

onwards, archaeologists have been on the alert to discover a portrait with

some claim

to represent him,

and no

than seven identifications have

less

None, however, has found anything

been at various times proposed.^

like

universal acceptance, in spite of the fact that the numismatic evidence


fuller

and more trustworthy than

usual.

series of

Samian

coins

is

show

the philosopher either seated or standing before a celestial globe set on a

He

pillar.-

nature
are,

is

richly

is difficult

draped and

is

bearded, while a band, whose exact

to determine, usually runs round his head.

The

figures

however, merely generalized and conventional like those of other poets

and sages on the coin types


torniate

evidence

must be reserved
is

important for

figured

by

Bernoulli.

The

Paris

con-

for fuller treatment, as a discussion of the literary


its

right understanding.

Pythagoras was, by writers who exceeded the canonical number of


Seven, reckoned

among

the Sages

thus

Hermippus places him sixteenth

of seventeen arranged in chronological order,^ and

in a list

Hippobotus

makes him the last of twelve, beginning, significantly, from Orpheus.'


The ancients seem to have seen in him almost the last man worthy of
being reckoned among them of old time, the sages and lawgivers of their
Even before his birth, Apollo proclaimed from Delphi that he
tradition.
'

For

Bern.

Ap.

list

see Bernoulli, Gr. Ikoiiographie,

op. cit.

Munztaf.

ii.

Figs.

Diog. Laert. Vit. Phil.

i.

i,

i.

p.

275.

21-2; B.M. Cat. Ionia,


42.

1*1.

XXX\II.

14.

Ibid.

The

3o8

man tmv

should be a

Laertius says

ircoiroTe

he

rrjv

again

prediction,

we

read,

ofio)^

co?

t<9

Bac/j.coi>

Sj;

His

ajadoq

did

life

ttj
Xd/xoi,^ and
rumour spread that

heal.'^

His mind was deeply tinged with Oriental thought


widely, in Egypt, Babylonia, Arabia, India even,^

he had travelled
and was versed in the
;

and philosophic systems of Egypt and Chaldaea, from which he

many

adopted

and observances,

tenets

lustration, silence, abstinence

ceremonial

purity

ceremonial sprinkling and

e.g:

from certain kinds of food, and (probably)

The

the entire doctrine of Metempsychosis.*'


ajveia''

not belie the

iTrtSrjficov

to the cities, the

Pythagoras was come, not to teach but to

religious

and Diogenes

ao(f)ia hiolcrovTa,^

tov Uvdayopov koX TifMCOv iv rols

ov TrapeXLirevr'

went about

as he

'

KciWei Kal

cre/xvoTrpeTreLav

S/XXot? SiiKvcov avrov


divine

British School at Rome.

which, once

object of

defiled, could

life

was

to be

only be regained

by elaborate purification. Such defilement came by contact with death in


any shape, by unchastity, by touching certain kinds of food beans, flesh,
cuttlefish, eggs and creatures raised from eggs.^
His raiment was pure
woven
from
wool,
and
though
white and
later legends declare that he wore
only linen, as flax grows by the bounty of Heaven, whereas wool is taken

from animals,'^ Herodotus speaks of the woollen garments of the Pythagoreans,^"

and Diogenes expressly

use of linen had not penetrated to those parts.'

would wear

period, Pythagoras

by

his great disciple

Aelian,^'^

Like

^^

all

the

lonians of the

and the custom was kept up


the next century ^- and by the later

in

at least.^^

Oriental dress

is

him by

attributed to

but a Greek philosopher would hardly have worn the dua^vpiSe'i

The

here mentioned.

coins

show

of a band or kerchief

distinct traces

round the head, and a statue with such a decoration


^

lamblichus,

Iambi, op.

Isocr. Bitsiris,

Philostr.

'

his hair long,

Empedocles

Pythagorean communities

wore wool because

states that he

dt:

cit.

Pyth.

vit.
ii.

ii.

5.

10.

28; Strabo,

xiv.

i.

might, taken

in

de Is. et Os.

10;

Vit. 36.

Ael.

V.H.

16; Diog. Laert. ViL

iv.

viii.

17.

13;

Plut.

Vit. Apoll. viii. 15, etc.

"

See Hdt.

"^

Diog. Laert. Vit.

It is clear that

ii.

122,

2.
33*.

the question of Pythagorean ood was a disputed one

Aristoxenus [ap. Aul.


maintained that Pythagoras used no vegetable more frequently than beans, and the
same authority declared {ap. Diog. Laert. Vit. Pyth. 20) that things which had life might be eaten
by Pythagoreans, provided that they refrained from the plough-ox and the ram.
;

Gell. iv. II, I)

^^

Philostr.

Vit. Apoll.

Diog. Laert.

" V.H.

xii.

32.

Vit.

i.

'O

32, et saepe.

Emped.

73.

1^

ii.

Athenaeus,

81.
iv.

163,;

Vit.

19.

Philostr. Vit. .Apoll.

i.

32, 2.

Portrait of Pythagoras.

connection with his Oriental travels, easily give

rise

309
the idea that he

to

adopted a purely Eastern dress.

As

early as Herodotus even,

myths had gathered round his name,


here, however, any discussion would be

is full of them
and the testimony of popular superstition is not needed in the
face of the witness of antiquity from Xenophanes to Plato and Aristotle,

and Aristotle

irrelevant,

to omit

names.

all lesser

any writing was a subject of dispute among


Galen,i Plutarch,- and Josephus^ deny it, but Diogenes
the ancients.
Laertius quotes a decisive passage from Heracleitus,* giving the names of

Whether Pythagoras

left

He

three treatises, iraihevriKov,^ itoXltlkov, ^vctlkov.^

also gives the

on the authority of Heracleides,* which

line of a lepo^ Xoyo'i,

the Pythagorean system of silence, at least den trovato

ciWa

'fl veoi,

Many

ae^ecrde

gives

us

Pythagoras himself

a cock as a punishment for silence in

others in

the

X\vday6pa<i

\x\v

fifth

ao(^o<; avrjp

etrj,

is

War by command

in

of

In the

a\X'

koX tijv yvcofxrju 6ea7riaio<;.

Rome

x^pollo,'^

probability existed, and

forced to

is

life.

widely different:^

statues of Pythagoras are recorded, one in

all

and

system,^

accused of avarice and cheating, and

is

Pseudo-Mantis, on the other hand, the tone

Samnite

rdSe iravra.

fxed' ^av^ir]<;

comic view of the Pythagorean

body of

inhabit the

Two

is,

of his reputed sayings are also in metre.

Lucian

TXew?

first

considering

it \s

the other

set

up during the

Constantinople,^" but

prima facie highly probable

that

century, which saw the creation of the Anacreon, the Epimenides,

the Seven, and other ideal portraits of similar character, also witnessed the

honour of a man whose influence was

erection of statues in

From some such

greatest minds.

appear to be derived

and

this,

Paris

the one important piece of

evidence hitherto brought forward,

On

the

statue

felt

by

its

contorniate would

must now be dealt with

monumental

(Fig.

i).

the obverse of this, one of the most interesting of contorniate

'

De plac.

Hipp.

C. Apion.

i.

et.

Plat. 459.

600

Cf. Plato, Resp. x.

"

Suidas, s.v. Pythagoras, mentions

"

xlv. (Sonimiiin seu Gallus) 4.

3
'"

Plut.

I'^it.

163.

Num.

viii.

Christodor. Etphrasis,

De
Vit.

Virt. Alex.

i.

4, 328.

Pyth. 6 seqq.

B.

them

also, doubtless
**

12: not noticed by Bernoulli.

120

seijq.

from the same source.

xxxii. 4.

Plin.

N.H.

xxxiv. 26.

TiiK Hritisii

3IO
types,

Sc:ii()()L

at

Ro.mi:.

a bust of Helios, radiate and holding a sceptre

is

nYOAFOPAC,

the inscription

and a

on the reverse

figure of the philosopher seated

high-backed throne, supporting his head on

his left hand.

The drapery

and majestic, the gesture dignified and appropriate, the whole

full

toto caelo

on a

The head

from the conventional figures on the Samian coins.

of peculiar shape, deep from back to front, strongly curved behind and

on

top.

neck

is

side,^

thick,

classical,'

'

is

flat

encircled with, but not covered by, a sort of kerchief knotted

It is

on the right

is

differing

The

and throwing a distinct shadow on the forehead.

the

eye recessed and set

the nostrils well marked, the

from the nose, the

far

mouth shaded by

profile

moustache

which mingles with the close-cut pointed beard, recalling Martial's epigram.
Sic quasi Pythagorae loqueris successor

Praependet sane nee

The

coutorniate

is

tibi

for

(ix. 47.)

on various grounds interesting.

place, rare for the obverse type to bear


still

et /lercs,

barba minor,

any

It

is,

in

the

first

relation to the reverse, rarer

type to be the head of a divinity, but the connexion of

that,

Pythagoras with Apollo- Helios lay at the bottom of the popular concep-

him

tion of

as a divinely appointed leader of

even as light

'

Sahatier

In

kerchief

is

men, as the son of Light,-

itself.-"'

(MM.

not indicated.

Cuiiloi-nial,s,

pi.

xv.

i)

and

Vi.sconli

(Iionogr.

Gr.

pi.

xvi.

3)

this

In the latter the engraver has mistaken for hair the projecting line

across the brow.


-

'

Didot.

'

Fig. i is taken from a cast in the British Museum.


Poeia tjuidatn SaDiius^ ap. lamblichus, Vit. Pyth. 5.

He was

early identified with the

Hyperborean Apollo

[Cf. the later writers cited in this paper.)

(Aristotle,

Fra^m.

vol. iv. p. Og', ed.

A Portrait of
It

l^vTHACiORAs.

highly probable that the figure

is

instances of such copies occur on a

accuracy of

a copy of an actual statue

number of

agreement with the

close

detail, in

is

character, of excellent

in

literary evidence, implies

workmanship, though

original, as the sculptor has

Greek

suggests,'^ a

and the

contorniates,^

acquaintance with, and faithfulness to, an actual original.


Among the unidentified philosopher-heads in the Capitol

unique

311

is

one

not,

(Fig. 2)

as

Arndt

misunderstood the arrange-

Fi<

ment of the hair. It represents a man in middle life, wearing a kerchief


bound turban-wise about his head and knotted over the right ear, casting a

The skull is square in form, broad between


on top. The neck is unusually thick, and the

strong shadow on the forehead.


the temples and very

'

hope

to

(leal

flat

lcni;lh

;il

wiih these txpes in a luithconiinL; number of the Numismatic

Chronicle.
-

Sala

(lei

Filosofi

So

illustrated

Mus.

Capit.

i.

88,

'

Archylas of

Tarentuni

Cp. Bernoulli, Gricchische Ikoiwgraphie


ihe photograph here reproduced to the kindness of Mr. Stuart Jones.

Hruckmann, Gr.
^

Text

u. riuii. Porlrats,

to Gr.

It.

rbiii.

Portriits

15 1-2.

52-2.

ii,

p.

"

17

ArnctI

owe

The

312

upon

set well forward

head

British School at Rome.

The eyebrows

it.

clear-cut, the upper thin, the lower

prominent

and the

are straight

The

and drooping.

full

lids

eyeballs are so

seen from the front, almost to form an angle with the outer

as,

corners of the eyes

and

it

is

this

peculiar treatment which gives that

expression of remoteness, of mystic earnestness, which distinguishes the

head from

all others.^

The nose

is,

The mouth

unfortunately, modern.

is

small and curved, the upper lip thin, the lower straighter and very thick.

The drooping ends


is,

like

of the moustache mingle with the pointed beard, which

them, composed of fine wavy locks, adding

The

of the profile.

much

to the straightness

the copyist, and he has

hair has evidently puzzled

scheme, only marking the mas.ses by a series of

worked out no

definite

irregular lines.

In the original the locks clearly were turned back from

the face and plaited round the head, while the hair growing behind the
ears

was similarly treated

instead of these plaits

hair beneath the kerchief, and a mass of

lines,

we have here

mainly

The same treatment

below, ending abruptly above the neck.

the space on top of the head above the kerchief, where


inappropriate.

It is

clear that in the original the hair

is

applied to
entirely

is

it

was

a roll of

to this roll,

parallel

laid

in

plaits

round the head, but, the fashion being unknown to him, the copyist has

worked unintelligently though with sufficient


reconstruct the original from his rendering of

faithfulness to enable us to
it.-'

comparison with the contorniate leads to the conclusion that both

represent not the

spondence

in

to describe

The

same man merely but the same work.

every detail

one head

in

is

too minute to be accidental.

It

corre-

impossible

is

terms that do not equally apply to the other, and

the literary evidence, though insufficient in itself to form a basis for any
identification,

strongly confirms the attribution,^* which

made

is

certain

from the inscription on the contorniate.

The

date of the original was,

by Dr. Arndt, who assigns


centuries.
>

If

we

it

earlier than

probably,
to

the

turn

of the

that proposed

fifth

and

accept Furtwangler's date, 445-440, for the

[Plaster has been used lo restore the eyeballs,

and

it

is

fourth

x^nacreon

not therefore advisable to lay too

H. S. J.J
on their present form.
- The head has been compared with a l^ronze portrait-head in the Naples
Museum (No. 5607)
(Comparetti and de Petra, La Villa Ercolanese, PI.
from the villa of the Pisones at Herculaneum.
Vni, 2 ; Mtts. Hal. iii, PI. V ; Gr. it. ro/ii. Port nits 1 53-4 but this, as I hope to shew elsewhere,

much

stress

represents a different individual.


3

The treatment

of the eyes recalls the phrase of Christodorus {Ecphr.

Pythagoras, Ovpavhv axpavroiaiv

ifjierpee jxovvov o7ranra?s.

I.e.)

where he says of

A Portrait
Borghese

'

and

in

is

it

every

of Pythagoras.

way probable we must

equally early for the Pythagoras, which


in

313

is distinctly less

allow a date at least

advanced and

plastic

the treatment of hair and mouth.

The

was certainly bronze, as a

original

and the contorniate

(for the technique)

absolutely certain, and

careful

(for the

examination of the head

drapery and details) makes

probably be assigned to the early Pheidian

may

period, when Athens had recovered from the Persian Wars and was
peopling her city with noble forms of gods and men.''
It is interesting to find Dr. Arndt writing thus of the head and the prob-

Durfen wir annehmen, dass der Turban als Attribut auch


solchen Leuten verleihen wurde, die nicht dauernd in einem der genannten Lander (i.e. Chaldaea and Egypt) wohnten, wie Solon, Pythagoras, die-

lem of the turban

'

selben nur fur kurzere Zeit aufsuchten

worthy presentment of a statue and

The

?
'

its

contorniate, with

makes

inscription,

its

trust-

possible to

it

decide the matter, and to identify this portrait as a fifth-century ideal of the

man who
it

could create the doctrine of the Music of the Spheres,^ of

was said that he was the son of Light

Mr/ \eyetv avev

Note.

itself,*

whose

rule of

whom

life

was

(po)T6<;.^

There

is

a further point of importance in regard to the date

of the original statue from which the contorniate and bust are derived.

The

cathedra on which he

Roman

neither

professor,*^

seated

is
is

it

is

not the typical cathedra of the

the familiar armchair type of

the third

century, on which Poseidippus and his companion-poet are seated in the

famous Vatican
1

/]/. w.
Of the

statues.^

On

the other hand, this form occurs on

many

p. 93.

sculptor

it

is

Cresilas is out of the


impossible to speak with any degree of certainty.
and those of this head, which,

question, from the difference between the heavy eyelids of the Pericles

Colotes, qui {fecit) philosophos, is possible, but we


a strong likeness between this head and the bearded Dionysos
The spirit of the two is identical, and there are
in the Mas. Chiaramonti (No. 44), {M. W. p. 95).
mannerisms in both which, despite the later date of the Dionysos, can hardly be assigned to

seen in profile, disappear under the brow.

know nothing

different hands.

I owe

to

There

of his work.

is

incline to think

Mr. Stuart Jones

''

Arist. de Caelo,

'

''

See for example Daremberg

ii.

the

this interesting

Pythagoras an early work by the master of the Dionysos.


and suggestive comparison.

9.

Poeta quidam Saniiiis,' ap. lamblichus, Vit. Pyth.

'''

lir.

zxvA Sa^lio, p. 971, Fig.

'

5.

lamblich.

111. 84.

1225.

Bruckm. Denkm. Nos. 494, 495.

The British School at Rome.

314
fifth-century vases

and

stelae,-

and there can be

Httle

doubt that the date

of this form of cathedra offers a further confirmation of the period and


character of the original.
1

E.g. Gerh. Gr. Vasenbildei; Nos. 305, 306.


xxi.
Conze, Attische Grabreliefs, Tafelband i.
;

xxiii.

125

century examples are numerous and include the stele of Hegeso.

xxvi.

xxvii. 62, 63.

Fourth-

P.B.S.R.

Fii'.

I.

Fig.

View

2.

S.

from Castel Giuini.EO: Villa Spada

in

111.,

the Dista.\ce

Via Salaria at TwEXTV-ForRrn Mile, looki.nc W.S.W.

(/>.

Plate

(/.

32).

22].

I.

P.B.S.R.

T''g-

3-

"\'n.i,A

Platform known

Fig.

4.

I'oN'i'io

as (jRottk di Toi.m<i,

iiKL DiAVot.o.

W.N.W.

\'iA .Sai.akia

(/>.

3S!.

III.,

Plate

Anci.ic (/.

36).

II.

P.B.S.R.

III.,

Plate

III

:;H

P.B.S.R.

Fig.

Fig.

8.

7.

III.,

Cistern on Sixth Terrace, Colle Tiutillo, Palomkara

(/.

Detail of Sixth Terrace Wale on Colle Tiutillo, Palomhara

Plate

78).

(/.

7S).

IV.

P.B.S.R.

Fig.

9.

Detail ok Third Terrace Wall,

Fig.

10.

Coi.i.e

III.,

Tiutillo, Palombara

Via Tiuurtixa at Bagni

(/.

120)

Plate V.

(/.

78).

P.B.S.R.

III.,

Plate VI.

-ss.'sa^ts5

4it.

f
Fig.

II.

.\(jrKm(i Al

Fig.

12.

'I

UK TkAVEKTINK

t^UAKKIE.S

NEAR BA(iNI

PONTE LUCANO, VlA TllSUKTINA

(/.

126).

(/

I23)

P.B.S.R.

Fig.

13.

Fig.

Rici.iEF m'li.r

16.

Wall

ok

into a Chai'ei. near Corcoli.e

(/.

III.,

138)

Lower Platform, Villa of QuiNTiLias


Varus

(/.

156;.

Plate VII

P.B.S.R.

Fig.

14.

ViADUcr OVER Fosso

Fig.

15.

ni

Ponte Terra

I'ONIK PKII.' Ac<,)UOKIA

(/>.

151)

(/.

III.,

147).

Plate VII

P.B.S.R.

Fig.

Fig.

18.

17.

Nymphaeum at

Ancient Road on

S.

W.

S.

Si.oi'Es

Antonio

ok

(/.

111.,

Plate

161]

Monte Stektaro

(/>.

164).

IX.

P.B.S.R.

Fig.

19.

Supporting

Walt,

of

Ancient Road on S.W.

Monte Stekpako

l''ig.

20.

Sui'poRriNo

Wall

ok

\"ili,\

(/>.

III.,

Slopk^

Plate X.

01

J64).

I'lah'okm ai Colle Nocelle

(/.

I0^^).

P.B.S.R.

Fig.

Fig.

21.

23.

Tank

in

Platform ok Villa at Casale Vitriano

LowKR Platform ok Villa on

Coi.lk dkl

Tksoro

III.,

Plate

(/.

169).

(/.

17:

XI.

P.B.S.R.

Fitr.

2.2.

Fit;.

26.

Lower I'latfokm of Villa on

Drain

in

Wall

Colli-:

Vitiuano

III.,

(/.

Plate

170)

of Villa Platform, Colle Cigliano

(A

173)-

XII

P.B.S.R.,

Fig.

24.

Cycloi'ean

Fig. 25.

III.

Plate XIII.

Wall under Wall ok Mediaeval Castle,


CoLLE Turrita (/. 172).

Caves on Colle Cigliano

(/.

173).

P.B.S.R.,

Fig.

iMg.

27.

28.

Lowest Platform at Monteverde

(/.

Uri'EKMOST Pj.ATFORNr AT MONTEVEKDE

III.

175)

(/.

175).

Plate XIV.

P.B.S.R.,

Fig.

^\-

30-

29.

^'Il-LA

Wall under Castle at Montecelio

Platform at Valle\l\ra, m-ar

S.

(/.

III.

Plate

li

Ancki.o

(/.

1S5).

XV.

P.B.S.R.

Fig.

Fig.

31.

32.

Supporting Wall ok Villa Platform N. of

\'iLLA I'LAIIORM Al'

TUKN
(A

I'V-SIX

189)-

I'll

Kl LO.M

I',

IKK

S.

(>K

III.,

Angelo

MoDKKN

Plate

(/.

XVI.

187).

lIlGllKOAl)

P.B.S.R.

^'g-

Fig.

35-

34.

TiiRRACK

Wall

III.,

ok Villa hllow Villa dei CSreci

Upper Terrace Wall of

^'lLLA

near Regresso

(/.

(/>.

Plate XVII.

190).

191]

P.B.S.R.

Ml.,

Plate

XVIII.

>setM^%,iii^*i.< Zi

I'ly-

35-

LowKR Terrace Wall of Villa near Regresso

P'ig.

36.

Supporting Wall of Road

{/.

194).

(/. 191).

P.B.S.R.

Fig.

37.

Bridgk at Quarto Pomata

(/.

195)

III.,

Plate

XIX.

P.B.S.R.,

Fisi.

l-'iil.

I.

3-

III.

PI.

XX.

p. B. S. R.III.

l-il..---

.*^^iajs^'-

iV

PI.

XXI

P.B.

as

,i,

.W^ -~

VI

VII

VIII

S.

R.TII.

PL XXIT

p. B. S. R. III.

f m^m
'

'

^t^.'i'Uisiiamm

i.j'-f

"^'"rr i
'

Mil'

'-^

<

'

'I(,,'.. .^.,,,^--

PI.

BBi

-."-

^^,

XXIII

P.B.

S.

R.III. PI.

XXIV

P.B. S.R.III. PI.

XXV

p.

B.S.R.III. PI.

XXVI

p. B. S.R.III.

PI.

XXVII

p. B. S.

RUT.

PI.

XXVIII

P.B.S.R.,

III.

PI.

XXIX.

P.B.S.R.,

Fie

Fie-

I.

Fis.

F'S- 4-

T,.

^\-

5-

2.

III.

PI.

XXX.

PBS. R.IIT.

f
X
f

PI.

XXXI

P.B. S.R.

III.

X.

PI.

.^^,

XX

T^

K T^ -^ OF

V0t^u

i^Ai^kM^^iiM^, ^m^

iSr CENTER LrBRARY


33125^0800 1048

You might also like