Purchasing Power Parity
One of the most enduring exchange rate theories is based on the foreign exchange rate's role in
balancing international trade. This theory is known as the purchasing power parity (PPP) theory.
The PPP theory is the oldest exchange rate theory, and one economist who has done some of the
best research on this theory, Lawrence Officer, claims that it was already well developed in the
1500s by scholars at the University of Salamanca in Spain. The PPP theory draws on the law of
one price, which says that arbitrage will lead to prices of the same products becoming equal
everywhere. You no doubt recall the concept of arbitrage from the discussion of the foreign
exchange markets. The PPP theory assumes that arbitrage in goods and services will lead to an
equalization of prices across countries, provided of course that there is free trade. But because
different currencies circulate in different countries, goods arbitrage cannot equalize prices
denominated in different currencies; it can, however, ensure that the exchange rate between the
two currencies reflects the differences in nominal prices expressed for each good in each
currency.
The law of one price suggests that if the price of a widget at home in the domestic currency is p,
and the price abroad in the foreign currency is p*, then the exchange rate will serve to equalize
the two prices:
(3)
p = ep*.
Or,
(4)
e = p/p*.
For example, if a widget in the U. S. costs $1.00 and that identical same widget costs Fr5.00 in
France, then the exchange rate must be e = .20 for the real price to be the same in both countries.
If the exchange rate is greater than .20, say.25, then widgets will flow from the U.S. to France
because U.S, widgets will only end up costing Fr4.00 in France. This arbitrage in widgets will
increase the demand for U.S. dollars and the supply of French francs, and the exchange rate will
tend to appreciate, or a will decline.
The PPP theory actually assumes the overall price levels in each country are reflected in
the exchange rate. Some individual products will tend to be cheaper in one country than in
another; indeed, the principle of comparative advantage tells us that the relative prices of goods
will differ from country to country. But for trade to balance, average price levels must
approximately be reflected in the exchange rate. Specifically, if P is the overall price index at
home, such as the well-known wholesale price index, and P* is the general price index overseas,
then the PPP theory says that
(5)
or,
P = eP*.
(6)
e = P/P*.
If the exchange rate did not reflect the relative price levels, arbitrage would cause large amounts
of goods to flow in one direction, which would cause the exchange rate to change up to the point
where trade flows were again balanced.
The PPP theory suggests that if there is inflation in one country while average prices
remain constant in another, then the exchange rate between the two countries' currencies should
reflect the changing relative price levels. The high inflation country's currency should depreciate
(its a should rise) and the constant-price country's currency should appreciate. The PPP theory
has been thoroughly tested using actual data on exchange rates and price levels across many
different countries and over different time periods. The evidence is mixed:1
! In the short run, there is virtually no correlation between price movements and exchange rate
movements.
! In the long run, real exchange rates do reflect purchasing power parity.
! The adjustment of exchange rates toward their purchasing power parities is very slow,
however.
That is, relative inflation rates are not helpful in explaining how an exchange rate will move
during the next week or month. But, relative inflation rates very nicely explain exchange rate
movements over longer periods such as 5 or 10 years. And over the course of a century, price
levels explain most of the variation in exchange rates. For example, James R. Lothian and Mark
P. Taylor found that over the past 200 years purchasing power parity very closely explains the
long-run exchange rates between the U.S. dollar, French franc, and British pound.2 And in his
well-known book on PPP, Lawrence Officer finds that relative price levels explain nearly all the
variation in exchange rates from the time of the gold standard in the late nineteenth century
through the floating exchange rates of the 1970s.3 More recently, Alan Taylor has used more
sophisticated time-series statistical methods and confirms earlier studies and finds that PPP held
over four different exchange rate systems beginning with the gold standard in 1870 and ending
with floating rates in 1996.4
Recent research is neatly summarized in Kenneth Rogoff (1995), "The Purchasing
Power Parity Puzzle," Journal of Economic Literature, Vol. 34(2), pp. 647-668.
2
James R. Lothian and Mark P. Taylor (1996), "Real Exchange Rate Behavior: The
Recent Float from the Perspective of the Past Two Centuries," Journal of Political Economy,
Vol. 104(3), pp. 488-509.
3
Lawrence H. Officer (1982), Purchasing Power Parity and Exchange Rates: Theory,
Evidence and Relevance, Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
4
Alan M. Taylor (2000), "A Century of Purchasing-Power Parity," NBER Working Paper
No 8012 November
