Electric Vehicles and Power Electronics
August 16, 2001
Presentation at
Universidad Technica Federico Santa Maria
Valparaiso, Chili
Jih-Sheng (Jason) Lai
Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University
Center for Power Electronics Systems
668 Whittemore Hall
Blacksburg, VA 24060
TEL: 540-231-4741
FAX: 540-231-6390
EMAIL:
[email protected]JSL
Outline of Presentation
Part A: Background and Introduction
What are Electric Vehicles?
Why Electric Vehicles?
Partnership for Next Generation Vehicles
Part B: Overview of EV/HEVs on the Market
GM EV1
Ford Ranger
Honda EVPlus, Insight
Toyota Prius
Ford P2000
Part C: Power Electronic Technologies in EV/HEV
Energy Sources
Traction Motors/Inverters
Auxiliary Motors/Inverters
Bi-directional Chargers
Basic Structure of a Fuel Cell Vehicle
JSL
Part A: Background and Introduction
What are Electric Vehicles?
Why Electric Vehicles?
Partnership for a New Generation of Vehicles
Specification of Supercar
EV/HEV Configurations
JSL
EV/HEV Definitions
An Electric Vehicle is
A vehicle fueled with mains electricity. An EV usually requires a
battery pack as energy storage.
A Hybrid Vehicle is
A chemically fueled vehicle equipped with at least one bidirectional energy reservoir. The fueled hybrid power unit
(HPU) is usually a heat engine, but may be a fuel cell. Energy
storage and delivery is usually electric.
JSL
Driving Forces for EV/HEV
! Simplicity (1910)
! Energy Security (1970)
! Environmental Concerns (1990)
! Customer Expectations (2000)
JSL
US Customer Expectations for EV/HEVs
!
!
!
!
!
Range:
Safety:
Performance:
Cost:
Features:
Minimum 160 km/charge
Same as ICE Vehicles
Same as ICE Vehicles
No more than ICE vehicles
No less than ICE vehicles
JSL
Partnership for a New Generation of Vehicles
Technology Areas
Hybrid/electric vehicle drive trains
Direct-injection engines
Fuel cells
Lightweight materials
LONG-TERM GOAL Development of a Supercar
Gas mileage: 3X average of Concorde/Taurus/Lumina, or 80 mpg
Load: Six passengers + 200 pounds of luggage
Range: Similar to todays models
At least 80 percent recyclable
JSL
Specifications of Baseline Vehicle and Supercar
Baseline
Curb Weight
3200 lbs
Drag coeff.
0.32
Friction:
0.005
Engine:
Internal Combustion
Fuel Efficiency: 26.6 mpg
Recycleability: 75%
Range (HWY): 380 miles
Accel (0-62 mi): 12 seconds
Luggage:
168 ft3
Load:
6 passengers + 200 lb
Life:
100,000 miles
Supercar
40% less
0.20
0.008
flywheel, battery, ultracapacitor
80 mpg (3X)
80%
same or better
same or better
same or better
same or better
same or better
JSL
PNGV Time Table
JSL
Where are the Energy Goes in a Conventional Car?
For Metro-Highway Driving Cycle
Rolling
5%
Accessories
2%
Fuel
Aerodynamics
6%
Engine
Driveline
100%
Engine
77%
Driveline
6%
Braking
4%
JSL
Electric/Hybrid Electric Vehicle Configurations
Fuel
tank
Fuel
tank
ICE
Xmission
Xmission
Diff.
Wheels
Battery
Pure ICE
Drive
JSL
ICE
ICE
Diff.
Generator
Wheels
Electric
Motor
Fuel
Battery
tank
Electric
Motor
Diff.
Wheels
Electric
Motor
Diff.
Wheels
Battery
Parallel Hybrid
Series Hybrid
Hybrid Drives
Pure Electric
Drive
ICE: Internal Combustion Engine
Xmission: Transmission
Diff.: Differential gear
How Does a Hybrid Electric Vehicle Work?
(a) Shaft driven by both ICE and
electric motor
(b) Shaft driven by electric motor
and battery is charged
JSL
Part B: Overview of EVs on the Market
GM EV1
Ford Ecostar, Ranger
Honda EVPlus, Insight
Toyata Prius
Ford P2000
JSL
General Motor EV1
Price: $33,995 MSRP
Lease: $424 - $574 / mo
36-month lease
$0.20/mile over
30,000 miles
http://www.gmev.com/index.htm
Power:
Top speed:
Drag coeff.:
Acceleration:
Range:
JSL
Charging:
Braking:
137 hp
80 miles per hour
0.19
0 to 60 miles, less than 9 seconds
55 to 95 miles with 26 lead-acid battery pack
75 to 130 miles with Nickel-Metal Hydride (NiMH) battery pack
220 V, 6.6 kW non-contact inductive charging, 6 hours
front disk, rear drum, and regenerative
GM Inductive Charge Coupler
JSL
Ford Ranger and US Post Office Electric Vehicles
Battery:
Fourth generation sealed lead acid
39x8 volt modules; 312 volt system
Capacity rating @ FUDS:
23 kWh (18 kWh at 80% discharge)
On-board Charger:
On-board, 240 V/30 A
Performance:
0-50 mph acceleration:
Rated top speed (governed) :
Customer range @ 72F:
Range - FUDS cycle @ 72F:
13 seconds
75 mph
50 miles
58 miles without A/C or heater operation
JSL
Ford Ranger Schematic
90 hp, 3-phase AC
induction
JSL
Honda EVPlus
New Technology Features
Standard Features
JSL
Nickel-metal hydride batteries
Permanent-magnet motor
Single-speed, direct-drive transmission
Regenerative braking
On-board charger 110- or 220-volt
Heating and air conditioning
High-intensity headlights
EPA City: 100 miles; Highway: 84 miles (Use 80% battery capacity)
Meets all federal motor vehicle safety standards
Dual airbags and 3-point seat belts
Anti-lock braking system (ABS)
Power windows, door locks and mirrors
AM/FM/CD audio system
Remote keyless entry and security system
Cargo area with "fold-flat" rear seats
Walk-in feature for rear seat access
Honda Insight Hybrid Electric Vehicle
Integrated Motor Assist:
EPA mileage ratings:
Driving range:
Drag coefficient:
Electric motor:
Battery:
Inverter:
1.0-liter, 3-cylinder gasoline engine + electric motor
61 mpg city/70 mpg highway
600 - 700 miles
0.25
36 ft-lb, 10-kW DC-brushless motor, 2.3 wide,
sits between the engine and transmission,
mounted directly to the engine's crankshaft
A 144-volt nickel metal-hydride battery pack
An advanced electronic Power Control Unit (PCU),
adopted from Honda EV PLUS
JSL
Drivetrain of Honda Insight
JSL
10
Toyota Prius - A Hybrid Vehicle
Engine:
1.5-liter, DOHC, 16-valve, EFI 4-cylinder with Variable
Valve Timing with intelligence (VVT-i)
Maximum Engine Output: 58 hp at 4,000 rpm
Maximum Speed:
100 mph (engine and motor combined)
Motor Type:
permanent magnet, 30 kW/40 hp at 9402,000 rpm
Battery Type:
sealed nickel-metal hydride with 40 modules
Combined Horsepower:
58 hp engine + 40 hp motor + 3 hp batteries = 101 hp
Fuel Efficiency:
66 mpg (Japanese 1015 city drive mode)
Maximum Range:
850 miles (combined city/highway)
Regeneration Braking:
Front disc/rear drum brakes with ABS
JSL
Prius Hybrid Drivetrain
JSL
11
Power Flow in Prius
Engine Flow
Starting from rest/low speeds
Full-throttle acceleration
Normal driving
Deceleration/braking
Generator
Inverter
Batteries
Engine
Motor
Electrical power path
Reduction Gear
Motive power path
JSL
Emission Comparison of Prius and Corolla
Curb
Weight
Nonmethane
Organic gases
(NMOG), g/km
Carbon
Mononxide
g/km
Nitrogen
oxide
g/km
Fuel
Economy
Accel
From
0-60
mi/h
TE
Km/L
Sec.
Carbon
dioxide
g/km
Vehicle
(kg)
Car
TE
Car
TE
Car
TE
Car
Prius
1237
0.002
0.033
0.025
0.062
0.001
0.063
112 155
20.8
12.7
Corolla
1143
0.025
0.068
0.808
0.864
0.124
0.205
157 217
14.7
10.3
Note:
Car values are vehicle exhaust (tailpipe) emissions
TE values are total emissions-Car plus upstream, including fuel
cycle emission
Source: IEEE Spectrum, March 2001, Pages 47 50.
JSL
12
Ford P2000 Low Storage Requirement (LSR) Car
Features:
Low Storage Requirement (LSR)
Direct Injection Aluminum Through-bolt Assembly (DIATA) engine
Integrated Starter/Alternator
Engine shut-down during braking and at rest
Very fast engine restart
Improve engine dynamics and shift fell
Modified shift strategy for reduced emissions
Weight and cost penalties low relative to full hybrid
enables limited re-generative braking
JSL
Comparison of P2000 LSR and Hybrid Vehicles
Series
5 + passenger, AlIntensive, Sedan
Parallel
5 passenger, Lightweight prototype
P2000
5 passenger, Lightweight prototype
HPU
55 kW, TurboAlternator
55 kW, 1.2 L, CIDI
55 kW, 1.2L, CIDI
Transmission
none
Auto 5-speed
Auto 5-speed
Traction Motor
75 kW, EV transaxle
18/30 kW motor on
4x4 transfer case
8 kW
starter/alternator
Battery
Weight
180 kW x 6 kWh
1401 kg
48 kW x 2 kWh
1258 kg
15 kW x 0.4 kWh
1000 kg
Platform
Fuel Economy Metal
(v. Taurus) City: 1.8x
Ceramic
2.9x
2.4x
2.5x
Highway
1.9x
1.9x
1.4x
2.2x
JSL
13
Ford P2000
Hydrogen Fuel Cell Car
Traction
Inverter
Motor
Fuel
Cell
Hydrogen
Tank
Transxle
Turbo
Compressor
Chemical Energy
Electrical Energy
Mechanical Energy
JSL
Daimler-Chrysler NECAR IV
A Fuel Cell Electric Vehicle with Built-in Reformer
Fuel:
Emission:
Top Speed:
Range:
Methanol
zero
90 mph
280 miles
JSL
14
Part C: Power Electronic Technologies in
EV/HEV
Energy Sources and Storages
! Batteries
! Fuel Cells
Traction Motors
Soft-Switching Inverters
Bi-Directional Chargers
JSL
Energy Sources and Storages
Lead Acid Batteries
Nickel Metal-Hydride (NiMH) Batteries
Lithium Batteries
Fuel Cells
JSL
15
Lead Acid Batteries
Flood type:
First design in 1880s
With flat pasted plate immersed in a dilute sulfuric acid
electrolyte
Valve Regulated Lead Acid (VRLA) type:
Original development in 1960s with sealed lead acid
batteries
The gases produced during operation are recombined
to minimize water losses
Typical gas recombination efficiency is 95%
Gas recombination cell can be made with Absorptive
Glass Mat separator or Gel Electrolyte
Electric Vehicles use deep charge/discharge type
VRLA batteries
JSL
Source: www.hawker.invensys.com
VRLA Battery Charging Voltage and Current
for a Typical Tubular Gel Product
Typical
State of Charge
100%
70%
50%
20%
*
Voltage
2.13 V
2.09 V
2.06 V
2.02 V
Measuring open ckt voltage after
battery rested >24 hr.
Charging Voltage
at diff temp.
0C
2.35 V
10C
2.28 V
20C
2.23 V
30C
2.20 V
35 C
21.7 V
Charging Current
JSL
Typically 10% of the 10-hour capacity, C10
In general, not exceed 30% of C10
For fast charge, keep 2.35 V per cell with 10% of C10 as the current
limit
Source: www.hawker.invensys.com
16
Nickel Metal-Hydride (NiMH) Batteries
Negative Electrode:
rare earth/nickel alloys LaNi5 (AB5 alloys)
titanium and zirconium (AB2 alloys)
Positive Electrode: Sintered-type positive electrodes are economical
and rugged while exhibiting excellent high-rate performance, long
cycle life, and good capacity
Electrolyte: Alkaline, a dilute solution of potassium hydroxide
Energy Density: Improved energy density (up to 40 percent greater
than Nickel Cadmium cells)
GM EV1 Test Range: 55 to 95 miles with 26 lead-acid battery pack
75 to 130 miles with Nickel-Metal Hydride (NiMH) battery pack
JSL
Comparison of Nickel-Metal Hydride to Nickel
Cadmium Batteries
Nominal Voltage
Same (1.25V)
Discharge Capacity
NiMH up to 40% greater than NiCd
Discharge Profile
Equivalent
Discharge Cutoff Voltages
Equivalent
High Rate Discharge Capability
Effectively the same rates
High Temp (>35oC) Discharge Capability
NiMH slightly better than NiCd cells
Operating Temperature Limits
Self-Discharge Rate
Similar, NiMH slightly better at cold temp
Similar to NiCd
Cycle Life
Similar to NiCd
Mechanical Fit
Equivalent
Selection of Sizes/Shapes/Capacities
Equivalent
Environmental Issues
Reduced with NiMH because of elimination
of cadmium toxicity concerns. Collection
of spent NiMH batteries is not mandated
JSL
17
Lithium/Thionyl Chloride Batteries
Negative Electrode: mixture of carbon, Teflon, fiberglass, alcohol, and water
Positive Electrode: Lithium
Electrolyte: Thionyl Chloride
Lithium batteries have been widely used in
computers and communications and will be
competing with NiMH batteries for EV
applications
JSL
Fuel Cell Vehicle - Future Trend
A fuel cell produces electricity by combining hydrogen and oxygen in
an electrochemical reaction. Fuel cells require no combustion, unlike a
conventional gasoline- or diesel-powered engine. The only emission
from hydrogen fuel cells is water vapor.
Fuel Cell Electric Vehicles (FCEVs) are similar to a battery-powered
EV except that fuel cells replace batteries. As with batteries, fuel cell
emit no carbon dioxide, although carbon dioxide and other emissions
may be created in vehicle manufacturing and fuel production.
JSL
18
Fuel Cell Vehicle Configurations with Different
Sources
Methanol
reformer
Hydrogen storage
Fuel Cell Stack
Fuel cell stack
Bi-directional
dc-dc
converter
Inverter
Fuel cell stack
Bi-directional
dc-dc
converter
Battery
Bi-directional
dc-dc
converter
Battery
Inverter
Gasoline
storage
Battery
Inverter
Motor
/Gen
Motor
/Gen
Motor
/Gen
JSL
Partial
oxidation
ref.
Methanol
storage
Gear
Gear
Gear
(a) With hydrogen
(b) With Methanol
(c) With Gasoline
Basic Hydrogen-Oxygen Fuel Cell
-
Electrical loads
2e-
2e-
Oxidant
2H+
H2
2H+
Fuel (H2)
1/2
O2
(Air O2)
Water
H2O
Electrolyte
Electrode (-)
JSL
(H2O)
Electrode (+)
Ion Exchange Membrane
(IEM)
19
Proton Exchange Membrane (PEM) Fuel Cell
-
Electrical loads
6eCO2
Methanol
Fuel
CH3CH
CO2
+
6H+
Vaporizer
Methanol
Reformer
CO2
Oxidization
Catalyst
Water
H2O
+
6e-
H+
H+
H+
H+
H+
H+
H+
H+
H+
H+
Water
3H2O
(H2O, N2, O2)
6H+
+
3/2 O2
Oxidant
(Air O2)
Electrode (+)
Electrode (-)
Proton Exchange Membrane
(PEM)
JSL
Fuel Cell Output Voltage and Current
Characteristic
400
Stack Voltage(V)
350
300
250
200
150
100
50
0
0
100
200
300
Stack Current(A)
JSL
20
Fuel Cell Output Power and Current
Characteristic
90
Net Power (kW)
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0
100
200
300
Stack Current (A)
JSL
20 kW Future Car Stack
JSL
21
Traction Motors/Inverters
Motor Design Consideration
1. Using Federal Urban Driving Schedule to Find Most
Critical Speed and Torque Region
2. Optimize Motor Design in Proper Torque-Speed
Regions
Motor Types
Inverter Partitioning for Integrated Inverter-Motor
Soft-Switching Inverter Considerations
Bi-directional Chargers for Fuel Cell Vehicles
1. A 20-kW Non-isolated Bi-directional Converter
2. A 5-kW Isolated Bi-directional Converter
JSL
Motor Design Consideration 1
Using Federal Urban Driving Schedule to Find Most Critical
Speed and Torque Regions
Speed (mph)
FUDS CYCLE
60
40
20
0
0
500
1000
1500
Current (amp)
Battery Current
(Pos=Discharge)
Time
(sec)
150
100
50
0
-50
-100
0
JSL
500
1000
1500
Time (seconds)
22
Motor Design Consideration 2
Optimize Motor Design in Proper Torque-Speed Regions Resulting
High-Speed (20,000 rpm) Design that Cuts Size and Weight by 30%
Torque-Speed Envelope
120
100
Torque (lbft,hp)
80
Torque
Power
Efficiency
60
40
20
0
0
10
JSL
15
20
25
Speed (x1000 rpm )
Motor Types
Induction Motor
Permanent Magnet Motor
Switched Reluctance Motor
Other Combinations
JSL
23
Inverter Partitioning for Integrated Inverter-Motor
ADVANCED AC MOTOR
AND CASING
GEAR
ASSEMBLY
CONTROLLER
MOUNTING
BLOCK
MOTOR LINE
COOLANT
INVERTER
GEAR
LUBRICANT
POWER
MODULE
INSULATOR
COOLANT/LUB
RICANT
INTPUT
TRACTION
JSL
COLD PLATE
OPTICALDRIVE
SIGNAL
OPTICAL STATUS
SIGNAL
POWER INPUT
Inverter Design and Partioning
Battery
Fuel Cell
Unit
Power Flow Control
IGBT Modules
Hall Sensors
ia ib
Gate Driver with
Protection
DSP
Circuit
Induction
Motor
Optical
Encoder
va vb
Sensor
Conditioning
Interface
Circuit
JSL
24
Using Optical Fiber to Link Integrated Power
Stage and Control Interface
Optical fiber link
Gate
Driver
Gate
Driver
Gate
Driver
Interface
Board
IGBT Based Inverter
Power Stage
Motor
DSP
Sensing
Board
JSL
Compact Gate Driver with Optical Fiber Link
+15V
6
Optical Fiber
4
MC33153
Fault
8
+15V
Ron
5
PWM
IGBT
Module
Roff
-5V
2
-5V
JSL
25
Soft-Switching Inverter Considerations
Zero-Voltage-Transition Auxiliary Resonant Commutated Pole
(ARCP) Inverter for AC Motor Drives
Zero-Current Transition (ZCT) Inverter
Advantages:
Allow high switching frequencies
Low switching losses
Low EMI
JSL
Turn-on Loss Reduction with Soft-Switching
Vce(100v/div)
Vce(100v/div)
Is(10A/div)
Is(10A/div)
Hard-switching
Soft-switching
Current, Iswitch
Voltage, Vswitch
Power, Pswitch
JSL
26
Turn-off Loss Reduction with Soft-Switching
Is(10A/div)
Is(10A/div)
Vce(100v/div)
Vce(100v/div)
Hard-switching
Soft-switching
Voltage, Vswitch
Current, Iswitch
Power, Pswitch
JSL
A Zero-Voltage-Transition Inverter for AC Motors
Auxiliary Resonant Commutated Pole (ARCP)
Csp
S1
C1
S3
C3
S5
C5
Lra
Vs
Lrb
Sa
Sb
Csn
auxiliary circuits
S4
C4
S6
ac
motor
Lrc
Sc
C6
S2
C2
JSL
27
Basic Operating Principle of ZVT SoftSwitching
C1
S1
ILr
Lr
ILoad
C1
S1
ILr
ILr
Ix
Lr
ILoad
ILoad
0
C2
S2
From t1 to t2
C1
Lr
IS1
0
From t2 to t2
S1
ILr
C2
S2
ILoad
IS2
C1
S1
Lr
ILr
IC2
0
IC1
ILoad
0
C2
S2
Sr
C2
S2
t1
t 2
From t2 to t3
t2 t3 t4
t 3
From t3 to t4
JSL
ARCP ZVT Inverter Test Results
A
CX1
B
C
SX1
SX2
Vdc
LX1
CX2
DS2
D
2 s/div
D1 C S
ia
M1
S2
ia
D2 C S
Auxiliary Circuit
Inverter efficiency [%]
A : vg(S2) (20 V/div)
B : ia (200 A/div)
C : iax (200 A/div)
D : vS2 (200 V/div)
S1
DS1
97
96
95
94
without diodes
with diodes
93
92
91
50.2 80.9 5.0 20.7 50.5 101.4 5.9 12.2 41.6 10.1 14.8 31.9 13.3 20.4 Torque [N-m]
1920
3770
5635
7560
9460
Speed [rpm]
JSL
28
Zero Current Transition Inverter
Sr1
Sr3
Sr5
S1
S3
S5
Lr Cr
Vs
Cs
AC
Motor
Sr4
Sr6
Sr2
S4
S6
S2
JSL
Basic Operation of ZCT Soft Turn-on
S1
ILr
Lr
Cr
S1
ILoad
current + VCr
direction
S2
in this
period
ILr Lr
From t1 to t2
S1
From t2 to t3
0 S1
0
VCr
ILr
VCE1
IS1
ILoad
S1
ILoad
S2
ILoad
current
direction
S2
in this
period
From t0 to t1
ILr Lr
Cr
0 Sr
ILr Lr
ILoad
S2
t0
t1 t2 t3 t4
From t3 to t4
JSL
29
Test Results of 30-kW Soft-Switching Inverters
ARCP ZVT
Ix (200 A/div)
Iload (200A/div)
Vce (200 V/div)
5ms/div
5
/d i
Vce (250 V/div)
ZCT
Ix (200 A/div)
ILoad (200A/div)
5ms/div
JSL
Basic Operation of ZCT Soft Turn-off
S1
ILr Lr
Cr
S1
ILoad
ILr Lr
Cr
0 Sr
ILoad
0 S1
+V
Cr
Initial
VCr is S2
negative
S2
From t5 to t6
From t6 to t7
S1
ILr Lr
ILr
VCE1
IS1
Vdc
ILoad
S1
ILoad
S2
VCr
ILr Lr
ILoad
S2
t5 t6 t7 t8 t9
From t7 to t8
t10
From t8 to t10
JSL
30
Soft-Switching Inverter Assembled in EV1
Chassis
Development...
Testing...
On the Road...
JSL
Bi-directional Charger for Fuel Cell Powered
Electric Vehicles
Other
Loads
Energy
Storage Cap.
Inverter
Battery
for Startup
CMEU
Controller
Bi-directional
Power Flow
dc-dc Converter
Fuel Cell
Voltage Clamp
High Voltage Bus (>300V)
+
Motor
Compressor
Motor
Expanding
Unit
JSL
31
Why Bi-directional DC-DC Converter is Needed?
1. Need to have high voltage to start up the CMEU controller.
2. Need to stabilize the bus voltage during transient
conditions.
3. Need battery to charge the dc bus bus for the initial startup
power (Boost operation)
3. Need to keep battery charged (Buck operation)
JSL
Circuit Topology Considerations for the
Bi-directional DC-DC Converter
1.
2.
3.
4.
Single-directional vs. bi-directional
Isolated vs. non-isolated
Multiple-leg Interleaved vs. single-leg
Voltage source vs. current source for either primary or
secondary side
5. Low side battery with 12 V, 42 V, or 180 V vs. high side
fuel cell at about 300 V
JSL
32
Non-Isolated Buck Converter
d
Q1
Vg
vgs
g
D1
C v
vgs Gate on
Gate off
Inductor
charged
Inductor
discharged
Capacitor
charged
Capacitor
discharged
Average output voltage:
V = DVg
where D is the duty ratio.
Because D < 1, V is always less
than Vg " buck converting
iL
DTs
JSL
DTs
Non-Isolated Boost Converter
L
iL
+ vL
Vg
iD
Q1
iQ
D1
iC
vgs
vgs Gate on
Inductor
charged
Gate off
Inductor
discharged
iL
v
JSL
Capacitor
discharged
DTs
Capacitor
charged
+
R
Average output voltage:
V=
1
1
Vg = Vg
D'
1 D
where D is the duty ratio, and
D = 1 D. Because D < 1, V
is always greater than Vg "
boost converting
DTs
33
Non-Isolated Single-Directional Boost Converter
Non-Interleaved vs. Interleaved
Load
L1
+
VFC
Vbatt
Sd
L2
S2u
i1
i2
VFC
S1d
Vbatt
(a) Non-Interleaved
Load
S1u
Su
S2d
(b) Interleaved
JSL
A Non-Isolated Bi-Directional DC-DC Converter
with Interleaved Control
Power module
S2u
S3u
VFC
Ld3
Vbatt
S2d
Load
Ld2
S3d
JSL
34
Ripple Current Cancellation Effect in a 20 kW
Interleaved Boost Converter
IL1 IL2
33 A/div
IL1 + IL2
33 A/div
50 s/div
JSL
Efficiency (%)
Efficiency Test Results of a 20 kW Interleaved
Boost Converter
98
96
94
92
90
88
86
Predicted
experimental
At Vin = 200 V, Vo = 300 V
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
Output Power (W)
DCM operated converter has parasitic ringing losses at the light load
condition, and the efficiency is suffered.
JSL
35
Isolated Buck Converter
L
Q1
Q3
1:n
+ Cf
Vg
b
Q4
Q2
+
v
Suitable for high voltage input and low voltage output
Zero-voltage switching can be achieved with phase-shift modulation
JSL
Isolated Boost Converter
L
Q1
+ Cf
Vg
1:n
C
Q2
Q3
b
Q4
+
v
Suitable for low voltage input and high voltage output
The main problem is high voltage stress on the switching devices
JSL
36
Low-Voltage Side Half-Bridge Current-Fed
Isolated Bi-directional Converter
S5
L1
S8
L2
Llk
1:n
Vb
Co
S1
S7
S2
Rc
!
!
!
JSL
S6
Cc
Low switch counts
Simple transformer winding structure
Low transformer current
Start-up problem
Low choke ripple frequency (fs)
Duty cycle limitation
Passive clamp is easy to implement but lossy
Low-Voltage Side Full-Bridge Current-Fed
Isolated Bi-directional Converter
L
S1
S4
S5
S8
Sc
Llk
1:n
Vb
Co
Cc
JSL
!
!
!
!
S3
S2
S7
S6
Simple voltage clamp circuit implementation
Simple transformer winding structure and lower turns ratio
Low transformer current
High choke ripple frequency (2fs)
Start-up problem
High switches count
37
Complete Bi-directional dc-dc Charger with
Clamping and Start-up Circuits
Start-up circuit
Df
If
Lkf
L
p
+
IL
S5
Tr
Vpn A
Cin
Lk
Vo
C
Is
Ic
1:n
S7
Co
-Ip
Vb
S8
S4
S1
Sc
1:n
S6
S2
Cc _ S3
n
Active Clamp circuit
JSL
Prototype of a Liquid Cooled Bi-directional
DC-DC Converter to be Installed in a Fuel
Cell Vehicle
JSL
38
Start-up Mode Operation
IL
125 A/d
Is
20 A/d
Start Up Process:
t0-t1
t1-t2
100 A/d
ILref
t2-t3
100 V/d
Vo
t0
t1
Start-up
Transition
command from start-up
initiation to regular
boost
t2
t3-
Start up mode, open loop
controlled
Boost mode, open loop
controlled
Boost mode, inner current
loop regulated
Boost mode, outer voltage
loop regulated
t3
Load
Vo
engaged at regulated
Vo=255 V
Vb = 12 V, IL = 161 A, Vo = 280 V,
Pd = 1.83 kW in steady state
Average current
loop regulated
JSL
Switch Voltage and Current Waveforms in
Boost (Discharging) Mode Operation
S3
Is
10 A/d
Vpn
10 V/d
Vb = 8 V, IL = 228 A, Vo = 288 V, Pd = 1.55 kW
JSL
39
Comparison of Measured Efficiency Profile for
Efficie ncy Discharging (Boost) Mode Operation
0.94
10 V
0.92
8V
Full-Bridge
Test conditions:
0.9
Start-up, battery discharging
0.88
10 V
0.86
8V
L-Type
Battery voltage: Vb = 8 and 10 V
High side voltage: Vo = 288 V
Switching freq.: fs = 20 kHz
0.84
0.82
400
1.
2.
3.
4.
JSL
600
800
1,000 1,200 1,400 1,600
Po
Higher battery voltage, higher overall efficiency.
Full bridge is more efficient than the L-type half-bridge converter in overall
operating range.
Efficiency at light-load exceeds 90% with full-bridge version.
L-type converter is lossy due to passive clamp circuit.
Switch Voltage and Current Waveforms in
Buck (Charging) Mode Operation
Vcd
250 V/d
Is
20 A/d
Vpn
50 V/d
Vb = 15 V, IL = 335 A, Vo = 425 V, Pcp = 5 kW
JSL
40
Comparison of Measured Efficiency Profile for
Charging (Buck) Mode Operation
Efficie ncy
0.95
0.925
Full-Bridge
0.9
0.875
0.85
0.825
0.8
0.775
0.75
0.725
0.7
1.
2.
JSL
Test conditions:
L-Type
Regenerative Mode
Battery voltage: Vb=15 V
High voltage bus: Vo=425 V
1,000
2,000
3,000
Pch (W)
4,000
5,000
L-type half-bridge efficiency reaches only 90%
Full bridge converter is more efficient with peak efficiency 95% because
more devices in parallel on low-voltage side
active clamp circuit provides lossless snubbing
soft-switching with zero-voltage zero-current operations
Summary and Discussions
Development of EV/HEV is very vital in recent years
HEV has hit the market since 1999
Fuel cell is becoming the choice of energy source for future
EVs
Power electronics is the main driver of EV/HEV
Key power electronics technologies are traction motor/inverter
drives and bi-directional chargers
Power electronics engineers are in great demand
JSL
41