Review of Literature: Chapter-2
Review of Literature: Chapter-2
REVIEW OF LITERATURE
In this section, an effort is made to review some of the studies conducted so far
with respect to the loan provided by the banks towards the various sections of the
society.
Okoria (1986) identified some factors that have effect on loan repayment. These
are nature and time of disbursement, profitability of loan receiving enterprise and the
number of supervision visits by credit officers after disbursement.
Binswanger and Khandker (1992) found that the output and employment effect
of expanded rural finance has been much smaller in the farming sector than in the
nonfarm sector. The effect on crop output is not large, despite the fact that credit to
agriculture has strongly increased fertilizer use and private investment in machines and
livestock. High impact on inputs and modest impact on output clearly mean that the
additional capital investment has been more important in substituting for agricultural
labor than in increasing crop output.
Badru (1997) made clear through his study that there is a need for governments
in developing countries to resolve the problems of poverty and agricultural decline in
rural areas. The means of achieving this is through the revitalization of the agricultural
sector.
Puhazhendi and Jayaraman (1999) studied about the financial sector reforms,
sustainability, viability and operational efficiency of Rural Financial Institutions
(RFIs). The major problems plaguing the efficiency of rural credit delivery system
were the mounting over dues and Non-Performing Assets (NPAs) of RFIs. The overdue
problem of different entities of rural credit delivery structure was reported to be an allpervasive phenomenon that cuts across these different agencies
community. He, therefore, suggested that efforts are required to address and rectify
these issues.
Burgess et al. (2005) who studied spatial and chronological variation in a bank
branch-expansion program that in India from 1977 to 1990. They observed that the
expansion of banks in rural areas significantly reduced poverty.
Mohan (2006) examined the overall growth of agriculture and the role of
institutional credit. Agreeing that the overall supply of credit to agriculture as a
percentage of total disbursal of credit is going down, he argued that this should not be
a cause for worry as the share of formal credit as a part of the agricultural GDP is
growing. This establishes that while credit is increasing, it has not really made an
impact on value of output figures which points out the limitations of credit.
Golait (2007) has found that despite the significant strides achieved in terms of
spread, network and outreach of rural financial institutions, the quantum of flow of
financial resources to agriculture continues is inadequate.
Gulab and Reddy (2007) studied the indebtedness of farmers in Andhra Pradesh. It was
reported that 70 percent of the farmer households were dependent on informal sources
(mainly money lenders) for their credit needs.
Barah and Sirohi (2011) has studied on agrarian distress and revealed that
indebtedness is one of the factors linked with farmers suicides on account of crop
failure and related issues. This situation brings out the fact that the existing institutional
arrangement for credit delivery is not adequate and suitable to address the agrarian
distress in the country.
Kale (2011) found that low productivity, low annual income, existence of
income liability gap, indebtedness and availing of non-institutional credit were proved
as important causes of suicide in Maharashtra.
Puhazhendhi (2011) argued that the need for increased institutional credit for
agriculture, the Government of India initiated a series of policy measures since
independence of the country. As a result the institutional credit structure in the country
has shown a significant growth both in volume and complexity over the past few
decades. At present there is an extensive banking infrastructure comprising 33,411
rural and semi urban branches of commercial banks, 14501 branches of Regional Rural
Banks, around 12000 branches of District Central Cooperative Banks and nearly 1,
00,000 cooperative credit societies at the village level which translates into at least one
credit outlet for about 5000 rural people or 1000 households. This is remarkable and
extensive network.