0% found this document useful (0 votes)
330 views3 pages

Tutorial 7 (Test Solutions)

This document contains the solutions to test problems regarding functional analysis concepts such as: - The definition of the adjoint operator of a bounded linear operator between normed spaces. - Showing that an operator T from c0 to c0 is bounded with norm 1, and finding its adjoint operator T* from l1 to l1. - Conditions for when a norm k·kT defined using an operator T is equivalent to the original norm, and showing k·kT is a Banach norm if T is closed. - Proving that a natural map T from F** to X** is an isometry, where F is a closed subspace of a normed space X, and conditions for when F is

Uploaded by

Fabian Molina
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
330 views3 pages

Tutorial 7 (Test Solutions)

This document contains the solutions to test problems regarding functional analysis concepts such as: - The definition of the adjoint operator of a bounded linear operator between normed spaces. - Showing that an operator T from c0 to c0 is bounded with norm 1, and finding its adjoint operator T* from l1 to l1. - Conditions for when a norm k·kT defined using an operator T is equivalent to the original norm, and showing k·kT is a Banach norm if T is closed. - Proving that a natural map T from F** to X** is an isometry, where F is a closed subspace of a normed space X, and conditions for when F is

Uploaded by

Fabian Molina
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 3

MATH 4010 (2014-15)

Functional Analysis

CUHK

Suggested Solutions to Test


Yu Mei

1. Let c0 be the null sequence space, that is c0 := {(xn )


n=1 : xn R; lim xn = 0} and is endowed with
n+

sup-norm. Define an operator T : c0 c0 by


T (x) = (x2 , x3 , )
for x = (x1 , x2 , x3 , ) c0 .
(a) State the definition of adjoint operator of a bounded linear operator between two normed spaces.
(b) Show that T is bounded and find its norm.
(c) Recall that c0 = `1 . Find the adjoint operator T : `1 `1 of T .
Proof.
(a) Let T be a bounded linear operator between two normed space X and Y . Then the adjoint operator
T : Y X of T is defined by
(T f )(x) = f (T x), f X , x X,
where X and Y are the dual spaces of X and Y , respectively.
(b) Let x = (xn )
n=1 c0 . Then, it follows from the definition of T that
kT (x)k = sup |xn | sup |xn | = kxk ,
n2

n1

where k k denotes the sup-norm in c0 . So, T is bounded and kT k 1.


On the other hand, we choose x
= (0, 1, 0, 0, ) with only x2 = 1, others 0. Then k
xk = 1 and
kT x
k
kT xk
Tx
= (1, 0, 0, ) which yields that kT x
k = 1. So, kT k := sup kxk kxk = 1.
kxk 6=0

Therefore, T is bounded with norm to be 1.

(c) For any = (n )


n=1 c0 = ` and x = (xn )n=1 , it follows from (a) that

(T )(x) = (T x) =

n xn+1 , since T x = (x2 , x3 , ).

n=1
1
1
Set = (n )
n=1 := (0, 1 , 2 , ), it is obvious that ` , since ` . Then

(T )(x) =

n xn = (x).

n=1

1
By the arbitrary of x, we have proved that, for any = (n )
n=1 c0 = ` ,

T = ,
where = (0, 1 , 2 , ).

Email address: [email protected]. (Any questions are welcome!)

MATH 4010 (2014-15)

Functional Analysis

CUHK

2. Let X and Y be Banach spaces. Let T : X Y be a linear operator. For each element x X, define a
norm k kT on X by
kxkT := kxk + kT xk
for x X.
(a) Show that the norm k kT is equivalent to the original norm on X if and only if T is bounded.
(b) State the definition of a closed operator.
(c) Show that if T is a closed operator defined as above, then k kT is also a Banach norm on X.
Proof.
(a) Note that it is easy to check that k kT is indeed a norm on X.
Assume that k kT is equivalent to the original one k k, i.e. there exist two positive constants a, b > 0
such that akxk kxkT bkxk, x X. Then,
kxkT := kxk + kT xk bkxk (b + 1)kxk,
which yields that kT xk bkxk, x X. So, T is bounded.
On the other hand, assume T is bounded, i.e. kT xk kT kkxk. It follows that
kxk (kxkT :=)kxk + kT xk (1 + kT k)kxk.
So, k kT is equivalent to k k.
(b) Let T be a bounded linear operator between two normed spaces X and Y . Then T is a closed operator
if its graph G(T ) := {(x, y)|x X, y = T x} is closed in the normed space X Y endowed with norm
k(x, y)k = kxk + kyk, x X, y Y.
(c) Let T be a closed operator. Let {xn }
n=1 be any Cauchy sequence in the normed space (X, k kT ), i.e.
> 0, N () N+ , s.t. kxn xm kT = kxn xm k + kT xn T xm k < , n, m > N (). (?)
Then,

lim kxn xk, for some x X, and

n+
{T xn }
n=1 are

lim kT xn yk = 0, for some y Y , since {xn } and

n+

Cauchy sequences of Banach space (X, k k) and (Y, k k) respectively. Since T is a closed
operator, (xn , T xn ) (x, y) G(T ) as n +,i.e. y = T x. Let m + in (?), we have
kxn xkT = kxn xk + kT xn T xk
Therefore, xn converge to x in (X, k kT ), which implies (X, k kT ) is a Banach space.
3. Let X be normed space and F be its a closed subspace. Define a natural map T : F X by
T (a)() := a(|F )
for a F and X , where |F denotes the restriction of on F .
(a) Show that T is an isometry.
(b) State the definition of a reflexive space.
(c) Show that if X is reflexive, then so is F.
Proof.
2

MATH 4010 (2014-15)

Functional Analysis

CUHK

(a) Let X with kk 1, since ||F (x)| = |(x)| kkkxk, x F , then |F F and k|F k kk 1.
Thus, T is well-defined and it is obvious that T is linear. Moreover, for any a F , X ,
|T (a)()| = |a(|F )| kakk|F k kakkk,
which yields that T is bounded and kT k 1.
Now, it remains to prove kT k 1. Indeed, for any f F , it follows from Hahn-Banach Theorem that,
there exist a f X such that f |F = f and kf k = kf k, since F is a subspace of X. Then,
|a(f )| = |a(f |F )| = |T (a)(f )|

|T (a)()| = kT ak.

sup
X ,kk1

which yields that kak kT ak.


(b) Let X be a Banach space. Then X is reflexive, if X = X in the sense of isometry.
(c) We assume F $ X w.l.o.g., otherwise, F = X is reflexive. To prove F reflexive, it suffices to show that
for any a F , there exists a x F such that a(f ) = f (x), f F .
Since X is reflexive, there exists a x X such that, for any a F and X ,
T (a)() := a(|F ) = (x).
We claim that x F . Indeed, if not, then x X F and := inf kx yk > 0, since F is closed. Thus,
yF

by Hahn-Banach Theorem, there exist a X such that kk = 1, (y) = 0 ,y F , and (x) = which
implies that
0 = a(|F )(=: T (a)()) = (x) = ,
but this is a contradiction!
Therefore, a(|F ) = F (x). Note that the Hahn-Banach Theorem yields that for any f F , there exist
a X such that f = |F . So, F is reflexive.

You might also like