An Old Sumrë Reference Grammar
An Old Sumrë Reference Grammar
Contents
1 Introduction
.
.
.
.
.
3
3
3
3
3
5
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
3 Nouns
3.1 Suffix hierarchy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3.2 Noun gender . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3.3 Noun case . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3.3.1 Common nouns . . . . . . . . . . .
3.3.2 -Geo nouns . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3.3.3 -B nouns . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3.3.4 -O nouns . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3.4 Definiteness . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3.5 Noun formation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3.6 Noun enforcement . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3.7 Similies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3.8 The conjunction and with nouns . . . . .
3.9 Comparative and Superlative constructions
3.9.1 Comparative . . . . . . . . . . . .
3.9.2 Superlative . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3.10 Locative nouns . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
7
7
7
7
8
9
9
9
9
13
14
14
15
15
15
16
16
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
17
17
18
19
19
20
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
21
21
21
22
22
23
23
23
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Contents
6 Verbs
6.1 Suffix hierarchy . . . . . . .
6.2 Conjunction and with verbs
6.2.1 Common verbs . . .
6.2.2 -Eas verbs . . . . . .
6.2.3 -Two verbs . . . . .
6.3 Subjunctive . . . . . . . . . .
6.4 Passive . . . . . . . . . . . .
6.5 Evidentiality . . . . . . . . .
6.6 Negation . . . . . . . . . . .
6.7 Imperative . . . . . . . . . .
6.8 Verb formation . . . . . . . .
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
25
25
25
25
26
27
28
28
29
29
29
29
31
33
1 Introduction
In the modern year of this world 1300AM, on the snowy mountainous continent called Malomanan
(meaning land of deer) there are 11 languages spoken amongst the people with a diversity of sound
and form. These languages can be sorted into the following branches:
In the Moichic branch is Moicha and Foriab
In the Lelic branch is Lelic
In the Lemric branch is Lemre
In the A-Sumric branch is Shfre and Somi
In the West M-Sumric branch is Pwr and Terch
In the East M-Sumric branch is Eamyr
In the Nmmezsic branch is made and Iriaid.
All of these languages descend from a common ancestor, Old Sumr. Back in the good old days
when that was spoken in Malomanan the Sumric peoples were one people who named themselves
the Sumn with one tongue. They lived by hunting wild deer and followed the herds along their
migrations giving them a nomadic lifestyle. As such Old Sumr is abound with words deriving from
the roots sum travel and loman deer. The constant moving around meant no regional varieties
could develop. But that changed when a giant wolf spirit called lam Yron evil wolf came and
gorged on the deer population, it ate so much that there was hardly any left for the Sumn to hunt,
causing a famine. But all was saved when another spirit called Mwtar Ra buzzard of language
came and fought lam Yron. After 12 epic battles the evil wolf was defeated. But the deer
population took a long time to recover, in fact it never did recover to its previous numbers. This
caused many Sumn to leave the nomadic life and settle in small villages. The first to do this settled
on a nearby island called Mlelwe lamnan and lived by fishing, they were known as the Lamn
(settled people). Over time the speech grew apart from those on the mainland becoming Lemre
(settled language) but the Antagan Empire invaded that island and imposed their own language
in the natives causing the extinction of Lemre, the Island was renamed by the empire to Lem Pars
(Lem Island in the Tynes tongue.) Lemre has since been revived due to nationalist sentiment
against the Antagan Empire which outlawed the language. it was recorded by Antagan scholars
before its death, the record they created founded the base of Lemres revival many generations
later During this time the mainland language also changed into Middle Sumri.
A century or so later more Sumn left the nomad life and settled on the Southeastern coast.
They developed a very basic form of agriculture (as much as the harsh land would allow) but also
fished the seas and hunted in the nearby forests, over time these settlements grew into small towns
and began trading when the Antagan Empire discovered them, causing the settlements to grow
further, attracting even more trading from other nations. The language of these people became
Moicha. However the most southern of these settlements found themselves in a vast temperate
grassland with fertile soil and large stone deposits which the people, who now call themselves
the Forana (people of the plain) used to build stone houses with, the more powerful leaders built
large stone towers for defensive purposes and as status symbols. Although horses were introduced
to Malomanan from the Henda continent, the Forana imported them and became fine horsemen
1 Introduction
themselves and lead raids against the Moicha on horseback. There is great tension and bloodshed
between the Moicha and Forana due to the Moichas growing greed of land and insistence that
the Forana are no more than rebellious Moicha on horseback. This tension caused the Forana to
raid the Moicha border, these raids would then escalate into Malomanans first full scale war. The
language of the Forana is related to Moicha and is called Foriab.
Sometime after that more of the Sumn abandoned the nomad life and settled on a small group
of islands to the south west, over time the speech grew apart from Middle Sumri and became
Malelweri (island language) but as the population on the islands grew they people expanded their
settlements around the South West coast. By this time the languages changed once more to become
Maifri. Some of these people continued further up the western coast into a more mountainous and
forested area called Pwrlw, their language became Pwr. Those who remained on the South West
coast and islands now speak Terch in the Terchl territory, a sister language to Pwr. Some of
the people that never moved to the islands moved northwards into the Mna mountains where
they encountered a species of giant eagle that had want of human flesh. Instead of fleeing the nw
inhabitants of the Mna mountains fought fire with fire and raided the nests of the giant eagles
and raised the hatchlings in human captivity. By doing this they bred tame giant eagles that would
protect humans from their wild cousins but they could also be rode on like a horse of the sky. After
some time the population grew higher than the mountains could support so a large number of
people saddles their eagles and embarked on a great migration eastward in the skies. They fled so
far east until they met the wide ocean beyond them and an empty land beneath them. They settled
on the far eastern island Vm which had never known human or eagle before. Their language
changed by leaps and bounds over time to become Eamyr.
During the seventh battle between lam Yron and Mwtar Ra, which took place in the centre
of the continent by the eastern mountain range, Mwtar Ra being the language spirit screeched a
booming call in the divine tongue to the skies to herald an epic rain storm. The heavy rain caused
the surrounding land to become a quagmire of wet and quick mud which trapped lam Yron
and allowed Mwtar Ra to attack from the air (for it had the form of a buzzard, hence its name
mwtar ra which means buzzard) though through trickery the wolf spirit escaped, leaving a
great depression in the ground where it had been stuck which quickly filled with water to become
a great lake. The battle itself and the now marshy land had trapped a band of Sumn and separated
them from the rest of nomads. These people learned to take advantage of the marshy habitat by
living off the new life the marshy wetlands would bring. They became the Lericnat , a quaint and
isolated people and in time their speech became Lelic.
Now back to the remaining nomads, now speaking Late Middle Sumri. The deer populations
still not back to their past numbers was putting more pressure on the remaining nomads. So yet
again a great number of them left the nomad life, they left Malomanan altogether. They set out on
boats and headed south, praying that the winds would blow them somewhere plentiful. And those
prayers were answered. They came upon a tropical archipelago bustling with natural resources.
The islands were already inhabited by natives who spoke an isolating tongue called Gl Ng, they
called the islands Trez Gal meaning three warriors referring to the 3 main islands. But no conflict
happened. None. Everyone was welcomed with open arms and it wasnt long before the two people
interbred in race and language, the Sumric tongue was the dominant language but it took on the
voiced sounds of Gl Ng and became Zvri, after more time and more mingling with natives
the language simplified greatly, dropping all cases and much of the tenses and became Shfre.
In the Shfre language Trez Gl became Trgal. There the people became great seafarers and
sailors known around the world for their nautical prowess. Back home to Malomanan, the very
few nomads left now speak Somi, which in itself changes greatly in terms of sounds but simplified
by dropping all cases, though this process started way back in Late Middle Sumri.
a, a
2.1.2 Consonants
Labial
Plosive
Nasal
Fricative
Labiodental
Alveolar
t
n
f
Palatal
Velar
h
j
L.approximant
Trill
Approximant
Glottal
Homosyllabic consonant clusters are relatively rare in Old Sumr, having only three which are rn,
rm and lm, but even these have a short schwa inserted between the two consonants:
ern [rn ]/big
-rm [er m] hearsay suffix
ralm [ral m]/long
hetero-syllabic consonants on the other hand are perfectly legal and do often occur.
2.1.3 Orthography
The Latin orthography of Old Sumr is the one used in modern transcriptions on the language and
was devised by modern scholars. The orthography is very shallow with a 1:1 phonemic representation. Diacritics that mark phonemic vowels are the circumflex and diaeresis to differentiate <,
, , > /a, , e, o/ from <a, u, e, o> /a, u, , /. The acute accent is used to mark high pitch on a
syllable with the underdot <, , , > being high pitch allographs of <, , , >.
Letter
IPA
b
c
d
e
f
g
h
i
l
m
n
ow
p
r
s
t
u
v
w
y
a
a
b
k
d
e
f
g
h
i
l
m
n
o
o
p
r
s
t
u
v
w
j
3 Nouns
3.1 Suffix hierarchy
Being a highly inflecting language, nouns very often do take on several suffixes so there is a specific order in which these suffixes attach to the noun which is as follows. The brackets denote a
suffix may or may not be included, depending on context:
noun + (case) + (number) + (possessive) + (conjunction)
yron yron wolf
yron + a yarna wolfs
yron + a + ca yaronca and wolfs
3 Nouns
Dative: marks the indirect object
Superessive: on the surface of something
Subessive: under something
Illative: movement into something
Perlative: movement through or along
Allative: movement to something
Comitative: in company of something, with
Apudessive: beside something
Delative: movement down from the surface, from
Supressive: above something
Paressive: beside something
Prolative: through something, by way of
Inessive: inside something
There are a group of irregular nouns called S-plurals that descend from Proto-Sumric inanimate
nouns. So named due to their tendency for the nominative plural to end in -s. Due to irregularity
of the S-plurals in the nominative, accusative, genitive and dative plurals each form is listed in the
dictionary.
nominative
accusative
genitive
dative
superessive
subessive
illative
perlative
allative
comitative
apudessive
delative
supressive
paressive
prolative
inessive
buzzard.sg
buzzard.pl
deer.sg
deer.pl
-
-
-a
-
-rol
-un
yb
-sel
-at
-es
eran
-ym
-c
-esn
-bin
-b
-
-m
-an
-m
-rol
-un
-yb
-sel
-at
-es
-eran
-ym
-c
-esn
-bin
-b
-
-
-a
-
-rola
-na
-yb
-sela
-ta
-sa
-rana
-yma
-ca
-sn
-bina
-ba
-
-ma
-ana
-ma
-rol
n
-yb
-sel
-t
-s
-ran
-ym
-c
-sn
-bin
-b
3.4 Definiteness
When a deer noun inflects and the suffix begins in a vowel then the finall vowel of the stem in
deleted: nca + - = c.
nominative
accusative
genitive
dative
animate.sg
animate.pl
inanimate.sg
inanimate.pl
-geo
-ge
-geo
-ge
-ge
-ge
-gea
-ge
-geo
-geoh
-ge
-geod
-geor
-geohr
-geoher
-geods
3.3.3 -B nouns
-B nouns are animate nouns that have been derived from adjectives with suffix -ab.
V= ends in a vowel
C= ends in a consonant
Case
Sg.C
Sg.V
Pl.C
Pl.V
nominative
accusative
genitive
dative
-ab
-b
-ba
-b
-b
-w
-wa
-w
-b
-b
-bah
-beh
-w
-b
-wah
-weh
The alternation of /b/ to /w/ in some of the endings is due to this affix coming from the ProtoSumric ending - //. Old Sumr sound changes turned // into /b/ when after a consonant but
into /w/ when between to vowels.
3.3.4 -O nouns
-O nouns are inanimate nouns derived from adjectives with the suffix -o.
Case
Sg
Pl
nominative
accusative
genitive
dative
-o
-h
-ha
-h
-on
-oh
-oah
-h
3.4 Definiteness
Each of the modern Sumric languages has its own way of marking definiteness (except Lemre) yet
each language derived its own way of marking definiteness independently, such that Lelic e and
Foriab c are completely unrelated. Even more peculiar is that no modern Sumric language derives
3 Nouns
its definiteness from Old Sumr, in fact Old Sumrs way of marking definiteness is incredibly
different from any of its daughters.
Old Sumr marked definiteness by shifting the high pitch to the final syllable of the stem and by
using a seemingly irregular vowel mutation system in which the vowel in the first syllable mutates.
There isnt an easy pattern to which the vowels change but the definite form has to be memorised
along with its indefinite form, although a pattern can be found if you have knowledge of ProtoSumric and the sound changes that occurred between Proto-Sumric and Old Sumr. An example
of the irregularity is that the vowel can mutate into either or e, the vowel u can mutate into
o, , a or . This vowel mutation can be traced backed to Late-Proto-Sumro-Naukl which innovated a way to mark definiteness by shifting stress from the first syllable to the final syllable of
a stem. This same system was used in Proto-Sumric, however the shifting stress affected sound
changes between Proto-Sumro-Naukl and Proto-Sumric as certain vowel changes only happened
when stressed or unstressed. Since the definite and indefinite form had different stress the sound
changes gave them different vowels. For example /a, / became /o/ when stressed (giving the indefinite forms /o/) but when unstressed they became //, also when unstressed //became //(giving
the definite forms // and //). In Proto-Sumric only polysyllabic words were affected by the vowel
mutation as in monosyllabic words the stress remained on the first syllable and therefore evaded
the sound changes above. This alternation became grammatical and spread to any polysyllabic
nouns by analogy even when their vowels werent initially affected by the stress related changes.
The vowel mutation in Early Proto-Sumric had the following pattern (each mutation is designated
as a class which is numbered):
indefinitedefinite
o
u
A very simple and regular system. Until the speakers (unaware of the stress related conditioning
which created this mutation) reanalysed this mutation as lowering vowels and they applied this
reanalysed rule to any vowel in the first syllable of a polysyllabic word by lowering it one height
or by lowering it to the height of the closest pre-existing low vowel. Giving the newer pattern of:
indefinitedefinite
o
u
, a (as /a/ was the only pre-existing vowel lower than + )
ie
y
e,
a
aa (No change: as /a/ cant be lowered further)
10
3.4 Definiteness
This new pattern was larger but still regular and very predictable. It was when Proto-Sumric
diverged into Old Sumr that the irregularity happened. Each of these vowels went through Old
Sumrs sound changes separately which destroyed the simple lowering pattern and due to some of
the changes being conditioned by environment the same unmutated vowel in Old Sumr can have
several mutated forms as the same unmutated vowel was originally several different vowels in Old
Sumr. Old Sumr also changed the rule to include monosyllabic nouns as well as polysyllabic
nouns. Old Sumr innovated a large amount of new compound nouns formed from verbs and
adjectives which were not present in Proto-Sumric and so never went through the same changes
in regards to deifniteness. These new compound nouns take the definite form by mapping the
compound onto a class depending on its first vowel regardless of its etymology. For example the
Old Sumr compound doclaferca milk is a Class 3 noun as its first vowel is // which is the same
as other Class 3 nouns despite doclaferca stemming from the Proto-Sumric *dk to drink which
has // as its first vowel, typically stemming from // would place nouns with // in Class 6 but as
the word doclaferca didnt exist when the Class system was created it was placed by analogy in
Class 3. Thanks to these sound changes a nouns definite class can no longer be predicted by its
sounds but rather each nouns definite class has to be memorised. I will write below each possible
mutation and the changes that caused it:
mutation class
first vowel:
mutates into:
1
1
2
2
3
3
3A
4
5
6
e
u
u
o
o,
u
,
e
o
a when after <l> or <y>
a
prefixes a- or
i
a
i, a,
no change
11
3 Nouns
5. dna, dnab din, dinb time, tent
6. stal astl hand
Reasons for the class groupings:
Class-1: The new unmutated form of // emerged due to a sound change which turned /o/ into
// when between consonants. The schwa was completely lost in Old Sumr and where is wasnt
dropped it became //.
Class-2: The new mutated form of /a/ emerged due to a sound change which turned // into /a/
when after /j/ (which would later sporadically change into/l/ in some words).
Class-3: The new mutated form of /a:/ was due to a sound change which elided /s/ when between
a vowel and a consonant and if that vowel was /a/ it got lengthened into /a:/. Due to the original
environment being lost it cant be told if a Class-3 noun takes mutates into /a/ or /a:/, rather each
instance must be memorised.
Class-3A: The reason that Class-3A uses prefixes instead of vowel muation stems from the fact
that the prefixes a-/- were once mutated vowels of Class-3 in Proto-Sumric. Proto-Sumric Class 3
nouns that had // as their first vowel took the mutated form of /a/. However Old Sumrs sound
changes got rid of // entirely and turned it into // but mostly deleted it entirely, especially when
word initial. So word initial // was lost yet its mutated form /a/ was unaffected by such sound
changes and survived. But since the mutated /a/ in this condition now had no unmutated form it
was reanalysed as a prefix. The - /a:/ prefix was due to a sound change which elided /s/ when
between a vowel and a consonant and if that vowel was /a/ it got lengthened into /a:/. During Late
Old Sumr when the definite marking system began to collapse, speakers would use the prefix aon any noun when they were unsure how a noun changed form (Which is the source of the Early
Lemre definte prefix a- which was used on all nouns).
Class-4: No exceptions to explain here are as both the unmutated and mutated vowels changed
into another vowel each.
Class-5: Nouns which have /i/ in their first syllable only belong to Class 5 if the /i/ descends
from Proto-Sumric /e/. Nouns which have /o/ in their first syllable only belong to Class 5 if the /o/
descends from Proto-Sumric //.
Class-6: Nouns whose first vowel is // only belong to Class-6 when the vowel in Proto-Sumric
was //.
Class-7: Class-7 nouns do not change at all. Nouns with /a/ as their first vowel and some nouns
with /i/ as their vowel belong to this class. This is due to the Proto-Sumric pattern of lowering
vowels to mutate them, and as /a/ is the lowest vowel it couldnt be lowered any further. Another
change which turned Class-4 mutated /e/ into /i/ made nouns which had /i/ in their first syllable
indistinguishable in their definite and indefinite forms so these nouns were reanalysed as belonging to Class 7.
12
13
3 Nouns
3.7 Similies
Where in English a simile is formed by using like or as e.g you are noble like a hero or you are
as noble as a hero. Old Sumr handles this by putting the descriptor (in this case it is hero) in the
comitative case:
mnar pyles mor
this literally translates as you are noble with hero
dvar nanssa mnr dv
The crow is as black as the night sky
grar yacsa
you fight like an antlerless male deer (antlerless male deers are held to be weak or less worthy
in Sumric culture)
yams brigrsn asilsa ymss
the fire burned as bright as the sun, (The fire brightly burned with sun)
mlmaral dvarosa emnr erad mab
the spear is as high as a crow
These comitative-similies are treated like adverbs in Old Sumr so they always follow the subject
14
3.9.1 Comparative
The comparative is formed by placing the object being compared to in the paressive case to give a
sense of beside.
subject + be + adjective + object-paressive case
Where in English one would simply add the suffix -er to an adjective or place more before the adjective, Old Sumr uses the sentence structure above to form a comparative sentence. For example:
Dna ron mnr ern Tarca ronsn
don-GEN dog be-3rd-BUZZ big taroc-GEN dog-PAR
Dons dog is big Tarocs dog-beside/Johns dog is big Tarocs dog beside
When using the comparative in a subordinate clause (dog that is bigger) the following sentence
structure is used:
subject + verb + object + to be-demonstrative clitic + adjective + object-paressive case
For example:
dac rn emnrsd ern Tarca ronen
want-1st-SG dog-ACC be-3rd=DEM big taroc-GEN dog-PARI want a dog is-that big Tarocs dog
beside/ I want a dog that is bigger than Tarocs dog
15
3 Nouns
3.9.2 Superlative
A superlative sentence is formed in much the same way as the comparative except that instead
of placing the object being compared to in the paressive case (as there are none in superative
constructions) you take the word nn all and place it in the paressive case.
Dna ron mnr ern nnsn
don-GEN dog be-3rd-BUZZ big all-PAR
Dons dog is big all-beside/Dons dog is biggest
In a subordinate claus the superlative works the same as the comparative also:
dac rn emnrsd ern nnson
want-1st-SG dog-ACC be-3rd-BUZZ=DEM big all-PAR
I want a dog is-that big all-beside/I want a dog that is biggest
16
nom
acc
gen
dat
super
sub
ill
per
all
comi
apud
del
supr
par
pro
iness
1st.sg
2nd.sg
3rd.buzz
3rd.deer
m
m
ma/mam
m
marla
mna
mayba
masla
mta
msa
marna
mayma
mca
masna
mabna
maba
tar
tr
tra/tram
tr
trol
tarun
tryb
trsel
trat
tres
tarran
trym
trc
tarsn
trbin
trb
lmr
lemru
lemra/lemra
lemr
lemrol
lemrun
lemryb
lemrsel
lemrat
lemres
lemrran
lemrym
lemrc
lemrsn
lembin
lemrb
lm
lm
lma/lma
lem
lemrla
lemna
lemryba
lemrsla
lemta
lemsa
lemrna
lemyma
lemca
lemrsna
lembna
lemba
17
nom
acc
gen
dat
super
sub
ill
per
all
comi
apud
del
supr
par
pro
iness
1st.pl.inc
1st.pl.exc
2nd.pl
3rd.pl
mtr
mtrman
mtran/mtarna
mtrm
mtarl
mtarn
mtarb
mtarsl
mtart
mtars
mtarern
mtarym
mtarc
mtaresn
mtarbn
mtarb
mlm
mlmm
mlman/mlemna
mlmm
mlemrl
mlemn
mlemyb
mlemsl
mlemt
mlems
mlemern
mlemym
mlemc
mlemesn
mlembn
mlemb
tr
trm
tran/tarna
trm
tarl
tarne
taryb
tarsl
tart
tars
tarern
tarym
taryc
taresn
tarbn
tarb
lm
lmm
lman/lemna
lmm
lemrl
lemn
lemyb
lemsl
lemt
lems
lemern
lemym
lemc
lemesn
lembn
lemb
The possessive pronouns have two forms which agree to the gender of the possessed object. The
possessive pronoun on the left is Buzzard gender and the one on the right is Deer gender. When the
possessed noun is animate or inanimate which possessive pronoun gets used depends on whether
the case ending of the noun end in a vowel or not:
ma estalgo my glove compared to mam estalgor my gloves.
Note that in Old Sumr there is no inanimate or genderless pronoun, only the Buzzard or Deer
pronouns can be used for the 3rd person. If the gender of an object if unknown then the Buzzard
pronouns are used as a substitute. Also while noun gender doesnt align with biological gender,
males are referred to by Buzzard pronouns and females by the Deer pronouns. This is because
Buzzards are hunters and Deers are the hunted, which is a reference to courtship between men
and women.
4.2 Determiners
Demonstrative, interrogative and existential pronouns in Old Sumr dont agree with noun case or
number and are distinguished by animacy rather than gender. For example the animate singular
pronoun is sn that which refers to things that are alive but sd that refers to objects that arent
alive.
sn mwtar cr sd ty that buzzard is eating that bread
sd tya c sn mwatr that bread is eating that buzzard
notice how when the nouns inflect for case, the demonstrative pronouns dont
18
4.2 Determiners
can (which)
Animate
c (who)
Inanimate
cad (what)
Location
cor (where)
Time
cin (when)
Reason
cl (why, how)
Examples:
c crs ma ty? who ate my bread? (as the subject and time is unknown, the 3rd person
Buzzard gender near past ending is used to conjugate the verb by default)
cad crs ma ty? what ate my bread?
amwtar crs ma ty cor? where did the buzzard eat my bread? (literally: the buzzard
ate my bread where?). Here where goes at the end due to a rule in Foriab that says Locative
Phrases (or words denoting where an action happened) go at the end of the sentence.
amwtar crs ma ty cin? where did the buzzard eat my bread? (literally: the buzzard
ate my bread when?). Here when goes at the end due to a rule in Foriab that says Time
Phrases, or words denoting when an action happened, go at the end of the sentence.)
cl mwtar crs ma ty? how/why did the buzzard eat my bread? Old Sumr doesnt
distinguish between how or why)
Adjective
Animate
Inanimate
Location
Time
Reason
Proximal
Distal
s (this)
s (this)
s (this)
sr (here)
da (now)
scl (because
son (that)
sn (that)
sd (that)
sn (there)
dut (then)
socl (that way, therefore)
19
Negative
Universal
Elective
Adjective
ld (some)
mu (no)
wae (every)
gol (any)
Animate
lna (someone)
waena (everyone)
golna (anyone)
Inanimate
lal (something)
mual (nothing)
waeal (everything)
golal (anything)
Location
lm (somewhere)
mucor (nowhere)
waecor (everywhere)
golcor (anywhere)
Time
ldna (sometime)
mucin (never)
waed (always)
goldna (anytime)
Reason
lcl (somehow)
mucl (noway)
waecl (everyway)
golcl (anyway)
20
21
Singular
Plural
nominative
accusative
genitive
dative
-os
-os
-osa
-os
-os
-osh
-osah
-oseh
22
5.2 Adverb
Sg.C
Sg.V
Pl.C
Pl.V
nominative
accusative
genitive
dative
-bo
-boh
-boha
-boh
-wo
-woh
-woha
-woh
-boh
-boh
-boah
-beh
-woh
-woh
-woah
-weh
5.2 Adverb
Old Sumr adverbs are a very open class system where adjective are turned into adverbs by adding
a suffix. Which suffix is used depends on the number ad gender of the subject as the adverb always
agrees with the subject of the verb. Adverbs always follow the subject.
buzzard
deer
animate
inanimate
singular
plural
-sn
-sna
-snos
-snbo
-sn
-sn
-snos
-snboh
Examples:
amwtar crs ty berdsn the buzzard quickly ate the bread
23
24
6 Verbs
6.1 Suffix hierarchy
Being a highly inflecting language, a verbs very often do take on several suffixes so there is a specific
order in which these suffixes attach to the verb which is as follows, the brackets denote a suffix
which isnt essential and can be left out, though they often are included depending on context.
verb + tense + (subjunctive) + (negation) + (evidentiality) + (imperative)
Example:
smen smen to travel
smen + arut sumrut will travel
smen + arut + pos sumartpos you may travel
smen + arut + pos + rm sumarutposrm I heard that you may travel
smen + arut + pos + mu + rm sumarutposmrm I heard you might not travel
smen + ye smye travel!
Suffix
1st.sg
2nd.sg
3rd.sg.buzz/anim
3rd.sg.deer.inan
1st.pl.inc
1st.pl.exc
2nd.pl
3rd.pl
-
-ar
-r
-
-ul
-al
-i
-en
25
6 Verbs
Simple past tenses
Person
Last night
Yesterday
Near past
Far past
1st.sg
2nd.sg
3rd.sg.buzz/anim
3rd.sg.deer.inan
1st.pl.inc
1st.pl.exc
2nd.pl
3rd.pl
-b
-arab
-rb
-b
-alub
-alab
-ib
-eneb
-m
-aram
-rm
-m
-ulum
-ulem
-im
-enem
-s
-aras
-rs
-s
-uls
-alens
-is
-ens
-c
-arc
-rc
-c
-ulc
-alc
-ic
-enc
Immediate future
Near future
Far future
1st.sg
2nd.sg
3rd.sg.buzz.anim
3rd.sg.deer.inan
1st.pl.inc
1st.pl.exc
2nd.pl
3rd.pl
-nu
-arnu
-rnu
-ru
-ulna
-alenu
-inu
-enu
-ut
-arut
-rut
-nut
-ulut
-alenut
-inut
-enut
-ye
-arye
-rye
-ye
-ulye
-alee
-iye
-ee
26
Person
Suffix
1st.sg
2nd.sg
3rd.sg.buzz.anim
3rd.deer.inan
1st.pl.inc
1st.pl/exc
2nd.pl
3rd.pl
-e
-easur
-easr
-easro
-easul
-easil
-easi
-easor
Last night
Yesterday
Near past
Far past
1st.sg
2nd.sg
3rd.sg.buzz.anim
3rd.deer.inan
1st.pl.inc
1st.pl/exc
2nd.pl
3rd.pl
-ep
-easunb
-easnb
-easrob
-easub
-easulb
-easip
-easomp
-epam
-easum
-easm
-easram
-easum
-easulm
-easipam
-easompan
-epes
-easurs
-easrs
-easros
-easus
-easuls
easipes
-easompes
-epec
-easunac
-easnac
-easroc
-easuc
-easulc
easipec
-easompec
Immediate future
Near future
Far future
1st.sg
2nd.sg
3rd.sg.buzz.anim
3rd.deer.inan
1st.pl.inc
1st.pl/exc
2nd.pl
3rd.pl
-epru
-easuru
-easurud
-easroru
-easuru
-easulru
-easipru
-easompru
-epud
-easurud
-easrud
-easrud
-easud
-asulud
-easiwud
-easmpud
-epy
-easury
-easry
-asroy
-easu
-easul
-easipy
-easompy
Suffix
1st.sg
2nd.sg
3rd.sg.buzz.anim
3rd.deer.inan
1st.pl.inc
1st.pl/exc
2nd.pl
3rd.pl
-twb
-twur
-twor
-tworo
-twu
-twuya
-twib
-twr
27
6 Verbs
Simple past -two
Person
Last night
Yesterday
Near past
Far past
1st.sg
2nd.sg
3rd.sg.buzz.anim
3rd.deer.inan
1st.pl.inc
1st.pl/exc
2nd.pl
3rd.pl
-twr
-twurb
-tworb
-tworob
-twub
-twuyab
-twip
-twrp
-twobam
-twurm
-tworm
-tworom
-twum
-twuyam
-twibam
-twrpam
-tworpes
-twus
-twors
-tworos
-twus
-twuyas
-twirpes
-twrpes
-twospec
-twurc
-tworc
-tworoc
-twuc
-twuyac
-twipec
-twrpec
Immediate future
Near future
Far future
1st.sg
2nd.sg
3rd.sg.buzz.anim
3rd.deer.inan
1st.pl.inc
1st.pl/exc
2nd.pl
3rd.pl
-twobru
-twuru
-tworu
-twororu
-twuru
-twuyaru
-twipru
-twpru
-tworbut
-twurut
-tworut
-tworhut
-twuyut
-twuhut
-twiwut
-twrput
-tworby
-twury
-twory
-tworoy
-twuy
-twuyay
-twiry
-twrpy
6.3 Subjunctive
The subjunctive is formed with the enclitic -pos which attaches itself after person agreement:
sumpos were I be travelling
sumspos were I have travelled
sumtpos I may travel/were I to travel
6.4 Passive
The passive is formed with the enclitic -ti which attaches itself after person agreement and after
the subjunctive if it is used:
lasts lustrtti the fruit will be plucked
lasts lustrutpsti were the fuit be plucked
28
6.5 Evidentiality
6.5 Evidentiality
Old Sumr marks verbs with evidentially. Which means that it specifies if the speaker knows for
certain what they are saying is true, or that they heard it from heresy, or that it is possible that it
might be true. And that it could have happened/will happen by looking at evidence. This is done
by attaching a clitic on to the verb.
Evidentiality
suffix
-tc
-rm
-il
-ici
amwatr acrmtc tra ty the buzzard definitely ate your bread yesterday
amwatr acrmrm tra ty I heard the buzzard ate your bread yesterday
amwatr acrmil tara ty the buzzard possibly ate your bread yesterday
amwatr acrmci tra ty the buzzard ate your bread yesterday (deduced from evidence, such as leftover crumbs)
6.6 Negation
Negation in Old Sumr is achieved by placing the suffix -mu onto a verb:
amwatr acrsmu tra ty the buzzard didnt eat your bread
lamn cwonrsmuci sr the deer didnt graze here
6.7 Imperative
The imperative suffix -ye turns a verb into a demand. When a verb is imperative it can only take on
the suffixes -ye and -mu meaning that it cant inflect for person or tense so in imperative phrases
the subject is always included (whereas English leaves it out), with locative and time phrases being
optional and taking their respective second last and last places of the sentence:
tar cye tra ty! eat your bread!
tar acmye tra ty! dont eat your bread!
tar cye tra ty amwatr acrtpos lm dnuc! eat your bread before the buzzard eats
it! (you eat your bread buzzard may eat it before)
29
loman
dwamnis
rct
rstal
fen
yron
slen
dercesal
frdwir
dercdwir
grr
arbtdwir
mrnis
fren
antlered animal
naturaly sees at night
natures antler
sorrow man
natures coat
grey one
to see. From Proto-Sumric *far to squint
31
33