0% found this document useful (0 votes)
158 views30 pages

Laplace Transform Practice Problems

1) The document provides examples of evaluating Laplace transforms and taking inverse Laplace transforms of various functions. It also solves initial value problems using Laplace transforms. 2) Key steps include factorizing denominators, using partial fractions, and applying the inverse Laplace transform properties to arrive at solutions to the initial value problems in terms of standard functions like e^t, sin(t), and cos(t). 3) Solving initial value problems using Laplace transforms involves taking the Laplace transform of the differential equation and initial conditions, isolating the transform of the unknown function, and then taking the inverse Laplace transform to find the solution in the time domain.

Uploaded by

Anthony Alvarez
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
158 views30 pages

Laplace Transform Practice Problems

1) The document provides examples of evaluating Laplace transforms and taking inverse Laplace transforms of various functions. It also solves initial value problems using Laplace transforms. 2) Key steps include factorizing denominators, using partial fractions, and applying the inverse Laplace transform properties to arrive at solutions to the initial value problems in terms of standard functions like e^t, sin(t), and cos(t). 3) Solving initial value problems using Laplace transforms involves taking the Laplace transform of the differential equation and initial conditions, isolating the transform of the unknown function, and then taking the inverse Laplace transform to find the solution in the time domain.

Uploaded by

Anthony Alvarez
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Practice Problems 10, Laplace Transforms

Evaluate the following Laplace transforms.

1.

L(e5t) =

2.

L(t2e2t)

s (5)
s + 5
(t2) =

2
(t e

) =

(s 2)3
L(sin(t)e4t)

3.

1
Since L(sin(t)) =

s2 + 1

1
Since

(sin(t)e ) =
(s + 4)2 + 1

(s7) (s 7)2 + 52
following Inverse Laplace transforms.
.

5.

s2 + 3s + 2
has a denominator that can be factored into linear terms:
1

s2 + 3s + 2
.

(s + 1)(s + 2)

1
by partial fractions =

s + 1

s + 2

so

s2 + 3s + 2
1

s + 1
s + 2
=e

t e2t

s + 5

6.

(s + 2)3
This expression is almost in the form
s

but it needs to be reorganized.

In

ed to cancel out the s in the numerator.


s + 5
(s + 2)3

add 2, substract 2 from numerator

(s+2)2+5
=

(s + 2)3
s + 2

+
(s + 2)3
separate (s+2) term out
###
cancel, then put in form for table
(s + 2)3
###
=

(s + 2)2
. 1.

+3
2
2
(s + 2)3
x
shifted version of L(t2)
.

so L1

(s + 2)2
=te

2t + 3 t2e2t

2
2 (s + 2)3
.

7.

s2 + 2s + 5
This expression cannot be factored into linear terms so we complete the

squared to get a shifted sine or cosine form.


.

s2 + 2s + 5
1

(s2 + 2s+11 + 5
.

(s + 1)2 + 4
This is not quite the cosine form:

we need an (s + 1) factor on the top, because every s must

be in (s + 1) form to use the rule L1 (F (s a)) = f (t)eat.


.
.

(s+1)1

(s + 1)2 + 4
1

(s + 1)2 + 4
s+1

(s + 1)2 + 4
1

(s + 1)2 + 4
Now we just need a 2 in the numerator of the second term to get a shifted sine transform.
s+1

s+1

.
.

(s + 1)2 + 4
1

(s + 1)2 + 4
1

(s + 1)2 + 4
1

(s + 1)2 + 4

s+1

= cos(2t)et

sin(2t)et

2
1

8.

s2 6s + 13
Like the last problem, this denominator cannot be factored into linear
terms, so we complete the square to get a shifted sine or cosine form.
for the relevant comments along the way:
s+1

s+1

the solution approach is identical.

s2 6s + 13
1

(s2 6s+9)9 + 13
s+1

((s 3)2 + 4
.

= L
= L

(s+3)+3+1

1
1

(s 3)2 + 4
.

s3

.
+

. 2 .

(s 3)2 + 4
2

(s 3)2 + 4

= cos(2t)e3t + 2 sin(2t)e3t
Solve the following initial value problems using Laplace transforms.
9.
.

xtt + 3xt + 2x = 0,

x(0) = 0, xt(0) = 2

s2X(s) s 0(2). +3 [sX(s) 0] +2X(s) = 0

L(xrr)

x
L(xr)

Group X(s) terms on left:


2

See the example above

(s2 + 3s + 2)X(s) = 2

s2 + 3s + 2
We now try to put the RHS into a form matching the table entries.

Since the denominator

can be factored into linear terms, we do that and then use partial fractions to separate the factors.

X(s) =
(s + 1)(s + 2)
=
Solving for A and B gives
=
so, taking inverse Laplace of both sides,
A
+
s + 1
2
s+2
B
s + 2
2
s + 1
.
1

(X(s))=1
s + 2
x(t) = 2e2t 2et

s + 1
Check:

this satisfies x(0) = 0, and (differentiating) that xt(0) = 4 + 2 = 2.

Both functions, e2t and et, also satisfy the original DE, so this solution satisfies both the equat
10.

xt + 2x = 4, x(0) = 0
Taking Laplace of both sides,

[sX(s) 0] +2X(s) =
s

L(x )
r

(s) =

) =

s(s + 2)
We now try to put the RHS into a form matching the table entries.

Since the denominator

can be factored into linear terms, we do that and then use partial fractions to separate the
factors.

X(s) =
s(s + 2)
=
Solving for A and B gives
=
A

B
+

s
2

s + 2
2

s+2

so, taking inverse Laplace of both sides,


.
1

(X(s))=1
s+2

x(t) = 2e2t 2

+ 4y = 1, y(0) = 0, yt(0) = 0
king Laplace of both sides,

s2Y (s) s00. +4Y (s) = 1

L(yrr)

)Y (s) =

s
1
Y (s) =
s(s2 + 4)
We now try to put the RHS into a form matching the table entries.

Since the denominator

can be factored into s and s2 + 4, we do that and then use partial fractions to separate the factors.
Y (s) =
1
s(s2 + 4)
=
Solving for A, B and C gives

Bs + C

s2 + 4

1/4
=
s
(1/4)s + 0
s2 + 4
11
=

4 s

4 s2 + 4
so, taking inverse Laplace of both sides,
.

L1 (Y (s)) = L1

4 s
1

11

4 s2 + 4

y(t) =
4 4
cos(2t)
ytt 2yt = 4,

12.
.

y(0) = 0, yt(0) = 0

s2Y (s) s00. 2 [sY (s) 0] =

L(yrr)

L(y )
r

(s) =

=
s(s2 2s)
s2(s 2)
so, taking inverse Laplace of both sides,
A
=

B
+

s2

1
=

C
+

2
+

s2

s 2
1

s 2

Solving for A, B and C gives


2
1

(Y (s)) =
s

2
1

s 2

y(t) = 1 + 2t e2t
Note:

if we were to have solved this problem using the yc and yp approach, we would have

a case where yc = c1 (constant solution), so our assumed form for yp would have needed a t multiplie
xt 3x = 39 sin(2t),

13.

x(0) = 2 Taking Laplace of both sides,

[sX(s) 2] 3X(s) =
s
x
L(xr)

39
s2 + 4
39
Group X(s) terms on left:

(s 3)X(s) = 2 +

s2 + 4

39
Looking just at the more complicated right-hand term,
X(s) =
39
=
+
s 3
A
+
(s 3)(s2 + 4)
Bs + C
(s 3)(s2 + 4)
Solving for A, B and C gives
=
s 3
3

+
s 3
s2 + 4
3s 9
s2 + 4
Combining with the other term gives
.

X(s) =

s 3

###
.

+
s 3
s

3s 9

s2 + 4
2
=
s 3
3 s2 + 4
2 s2 + 4
so x(t) = 5e3t 3 cos(2t)

sin(2t)

xtt + 6xt + 34x = 34, x(0) = 2, xt(0) = 3


Taking Laplace of both sides,

14.

s2X(s) s2(3). +6 [sX(s) 0] +34X(s) =

34

L(x )
rr

L(xr)

+ 3

34

s
2s + 3
X(s) =
s2 + 6s + 34
34
s(s2 + 6s + 34)

Focusing on the complicated right-hand term,


34

Bs + C
s(s2 + 6s + 34)

Solving for A and B gives


+
s
=

s2 + 6s + 34
1

s + 6
s

so, taking inverse Laplace of both sides,


.
1

(X(s))=1
s + 2
x(t) = 2e2t 2et

s + 1

s2 + 6s + 34

se every s must

transform.

example above

separate the factors.

satisfies both the equation and the initial conditions given.

separate the

separate the factors.

we would have

ave needed a t multiplier to avoid the overlap.

Using Laplace transforms avoids the need for this special- case

r this special- case logic when you are building the solution.

You might also like