Annual Progress Report Format: Nes' Institute of Management Studies, Chiplun
Annual Progress Report Format: Nes' Institute of Management Studies, Chiplun
1.
2.
3.
Teaching:
Exam:
___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________--____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
1.
Subjects
Taught
[Semester]
Total
No. of
lecture
s
Resul
t
Workin
g
Project
(s)
guided
(Nos.)
Paper
settin
g
(Nos.)
Evaluatio
n
(Name of
subjects)
Creation of
Teaching
Material
(Name of subject
and form)
No. of Hours/week:
* Weekly/fortnightly/Monthly
_________________________________________________________________________________________________
Note:
Attach relevant documents in support of the information provided as an annexure (number annexure appropriately). The
term of reference mentioned is primarily for engineering institution; other Institutions shall use appropriate terminology, if
required.
Part A-continued
4. Paper Publication Conference:[Mention
2 Nos. ]
Conferences organized by
_________________________________________________________________________________________________
Note:
Attach relevant documents in support of the information provided as an annexure (number annexure appropriately). The
term of reference mentioned is primarily for engineering institution; other Institutions shall use appropriate terminology, if
required.
Part A-continued
3
Projects
(Grants received- Amount)
If Yes,
Amount
Guest Lecture
delivered
(In other
Institute)
Name of
the Funding Agency
12. Best Practices, Use of ICT, IPR related& Content beyond Syllabus:
Best Practices in
T/L process
Use of ICT
Efforts taken
related to IPR
Content
Beyond
Syllabus
NBA
University
including
Officer In
charge,
Exam
Sanstha
Institution
Any other
(specify)
_________________________________________________________________________________________________
Note:
Attach relevant documents in support of the information provided as an annexure (number annexure appropriately). The
term of reference mentioned is primarily for engineering institution; other Institutions shall use appropriate terminology, if
required.
Part - B
(99-95%)
(94-90%) 3
(89-81%)
(100-96%)
1
(69-65%)
(95 90%) 4
(89-80%) 3
(79-75 %) 2
(100-96%)
(74-70%)
(95-90%) 4
(89-85%) 3
(84-80%) 2
(79-
(95-90%) 4
(95-90%) 4
(89-80%) 3
(79 - 70%)
(79-75%) 2
(79 - 70%)
(89 - 80%)
(89 - 85%)
(69-60%) 2
(69-60%) 2
(79-70%)
(84-80%)
PG Programmes:
First Year Subjects
_________________________________________________________________________________________________
Note:
Attach relevant documents in support of the information provided as an annexure (number annexure appropriately). The
term of reference mentioned is primarily for engineering institution; other Institutions shall use appropriate terminology, if
required.
6
(100-96%)
(69 -60%) 1
(59 -55%)
(95-90%) 4
(95-90%) 4
(89 - 80%)
(89 - 85%)
(79-70%)
(84-80%) 2
[Percentage of marks to be rounded off to higher integer. For ex...Faculty teaching 2 nd Year &
final year subjects: If the result of final year is 70% and result of 2nd year subject is 60% then
the marks obtained on these parameters have to be averaged i.e. 1+3/2=2]
Max
Marks:
30
Marks
Scored:
Max)
2. Student Interaction:(1 hour/subject/week as included in time table
Marks
Scored:
Part - B
Marks:
05
Based on the HODs observations done on fortnightly basis, the marks will be: [Tick
appropriately]
a. Log Maintained Properly; on continuous basis: 5 marks
b. Log maintained properly sometimes: 3 marks
c. Log not Maintained properly: 0 mark
Max
Marks
3. Faculty Interaction, Mentoring & Guidance (1 hour/week): [Tick
appropriately]
Marks:
05
Max
Marks:
20
Scored:
Marks
Scored:
Note: HoD has to notify category wise list in the beginning of the session.
a. 20 marks/paper in category A
b. 10 marks/paper in category B
c. 5 marks/paper in category C
Max
Marks
Marks:
Scored:
_________________________________________________________________________________________________
10
Note:
Attach relevant documents in support of the information provided as an annexure (number annexure appropriately). The
term of reference mentioned is primarily for engineering institution; other Institutions shall use appropriate terminology, if
required.
Conferences organized by Category A: Institutes of National Importance (IITs, IIMs, IISC Bangalore, NITs)
Category B: Deemed Universities, NBA/NAAC Accredited Institutions, Professional societies
and other Govt.
Institutions
Category C: Private Institutions
a. 10 marks/paper in category A
b. 05 marks/paper in category B
c. 03 marks/paper in category C
Part - B
[
Max
Marks
Marks:
Scored:
10
Development/Guiding
project
10 Marks
8 Marks
5 Marks
Max
Marks:
10
Marks
Scored:
Max
Marks:
05
Marks
Scored:
a.
b.
c.
d.
Marks:
Convener/Main In charge
5 Marks 05
In charge/Coordinator of any Committee- 4 Marks
Member of any committee
3 Marks
Max
Marks:
30
Scored:
Marks
Scored:
_________________________________________________________________________________________________
Note:
Attach relevant documents in support of the information provided as an annexure (number annexure appropriately). The
term of reference mentioned is primarily for engineering institution; other Institutions shall use appropriate terminology, if
required.
Max
a.
b.
c.
d.
e.
Project
Project
Project
Project
Project
worth
worth
worth
worth
worth
10
3+Lacs2+Lacs1+ Lac
50 K+
25 K+
10 Marks
5 Marks
3 Marks
2 Marks
1 Mark
12.
Marks
Scored:
YES: 4 Marks
Max
Marks:
04
Marks
Scored:
Part - B
YES: 5 Marks
Marks
Scored:
10
Max
Marks:
05
Marks
Scored:
Two expert lectures taken beyond scheduled lectures (to be added in teaching
plan)
3
2 One expert lecture taken beyond scheduled lectures (to be added in teaching plan)
1
Syllabus
Part -B
_________________________________________________________________________________________________
Note:
Attach relevant documents in support of the information provided as an annexure (number annexure appropriately). The
term of reference mentioned is primarily for engineering institution; other Institutions shall use appropriate terminology, if
required.
2.
3.
4. Initiative taken to implement new ideas for qualitative improvement at deptt. Level:
4
5.
6.
Communication Skills:
4
3
Ability to work with colleagues:
4
3
1
2
1
1
PART C
APPRAISAL SUMMARY C.1 UGC + MR
B.1
APPRAISAL PARAMETERS
MAXIMUM
MARKS
MARKS
SCORED
Quantitative Appraisal:
_________________________________________________________________________________________________
Note:
Attach relevant documents in support of the information provided as an annexure (number annexure appropriately). The
term of reference mentioned is primarily for engineering institution; other Institutions shall use appropriate terminology, if
required.
1.
30
2.
Student Interaction
05
3.
4.
Paper Publications-Journals
20
5.
Paper Publications-Conferences
10
6.
10
7.
STTP/SDP Attended
10
8.
Seminar/Workshop attended
05
9.
STTP/SDP/Workshop/Seminar/Conference organized
05
10.
Sponsored Research
30
11.
10
12.
04
13.
05
14.
10
15.
05
Total
B.2
164
Subjective Appraisal:
36
Total Score
05
Honorary consultancy
Paper
publication/Projects/Consultancy
in
Thrust
areas[Dept.]
Monograms, Books, Chapters
Patent Awarded
Faculty In charge for students Summer Industrial
Training
Ph.D. Qualification
Ph.D. pursuing
200
/200
05
05
05
15
05
10
05
/200
_________________________________________________________________________________________________
Note:
Attach relevant documents in support of the information provided as an annexure (number annexure appropriately). The
term of reference mentioned is primarily for engineering institution; other Institutions shall use appropriate terminology, if
required.
Overall Grading
Outstanding
90%
180
Excellent
80%
160
Very Good
70% 140
Satisfactory
60%
120
Average
55%
110
Below Average
< 55%
<110
Concurrence of the Principal: Do you agree with the assessment of the assessing
officer: YES / NO
_________________________________________________________________________________________________
Note:
Attach relevant documents in support of the information provided as an annexure (number annexure appropriately). The
term of reference mentioned is primarily for engineering institution; other Institutions shall use appropriate terminology, if
required.
PART C
APPRAISAL SUMMARY C.2 Other Category
B.1
APPRAISAL PARAMETERS
MAXIMUM
MARKS
MARKS
SCORED
Quantitative Appraisal:
1.
30
2.
Student Interaction
05
3.
4.
Paper Publications-Journals
20
5.
Paper Publications-Conferences
10
6.
7.
Seminar/Workshop attended
05
8.
STTP/SDP/Workshop/Seminar/Conference organized
05
9.
04
10.
11.
10
12.
05
10
Total
B.
2
05
05
114
Subjective Appraisal:
36
Total Score
Over & Above weightage [Documentary evidence
to be attached]
Honorary consultancy
Paper
publication/Projects/Consultancy
in
Thrust
areas[Dept.]
Monograms, Books, Chapters
Patent Awarded
Faculty In charge for students Summer Industrial
Training
Ph.D. pursuing
150
/150
05
05
05
15
05
05
_________________________________________________________________________________________________
Note:
Attach relevant documents in support of the information provided as an annexure (number annexure appropriately). The
term of reference mentioned is primarily for engineering institution; other Institutions shall use appropriate terminology, if
required.
/150
Overall Grading
Outstanding
90%
135
Excellent
80%
120
Very Good
70% 105
Satisfactory
60%
90
Average
55%
82.5
Below Average
< 55%
<82.5
Concurrence of the Principal: Do you agree with the assessment of the assessing
officer: YES / NO
_________________________________________________________________________________________________
Note:
Attach relevant documents in support of the information provided as an annexure (number annexure appropriately). The
term of reference mentioned is primarily for engineering institution; other Institutions shall use appropriate terminology, if
required.
_________________________________________________________________________________________________
Note:
Attach relevant documents in support of the information provided as an annexure (number annexure appropriately). The
term of reference mentioned is primarily for engineering institution; other Institutions shall use appropriate terminology, if
required.