0% found this document useful (0 votes)
44 views15 pages

Annual Progress Report Format: Nes' Institute of Management Studies, Chiplun

The document provides the format for the annual progress report for faculty members at NES Institute of Management Studies in Chiplun. The report format includes 3 parts: Part A for information filled by the faculty member, Part B for appraisal by the coordinator, and Part C for the appraisal summary. Part A requires faculty to provide details of their work over the academic year, including subjects taught, publications, conferences/workshops attended and conducted, research, consultancy projects, additional institutional responsibilities, and best teaching practices. Part B outlines the quantitative appraisal process conducted by the coordinator, awarding marks for teaching performance, student and faculty interaction, publications, conferences, and other metrics. Part C indicates

Uploaded by

Anagha Pranjape
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
44 views15 pages

Annual Progress Report Format: Nes' Institute of Management Studies, Chiplun

The document provides the format for the annual progress report for faculty members at NES Institute of Management Studies in Chiplun. The report format includes 3 parts: Part A for information filled by the faculty member, Part B for appraisal by the coordinator, and Part C for the appraisal summary. Part A requires faculty to provide details of their work over the academic year, including subjects taught, publications, conferences/workshops attended and conducted, research, consultancy projects, additional institutional responsibilities, and best teaching practices. Part B outlines the quantitative appraisal process conducted by the coordinator, awarding marks for teaching performance, student and faculty interaction, publications, conferences, and other metrics. Part C indicates

Uploaded by

Anagha Pranjape
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 15

NES

INSTITUTE OF MANAGEMENT STUDIES, CHIPLUN

Annual Progress Report Format


(For Faculty Members)

1.

Part - A: Information to be filled by the faculty


member

2.

Part - B [ B.1& B.2]: Appraisal by the


Coordinator

3.

Part - C: Appraisal Summary


C.1: UGC Approved & Management Regular[MR] Faculty
members
C.2: Other category faculty members

Academic Year: 2016-17


Part A
Appraisal period:
No. of Weeks:
Working:

[Month Year to Month Year]

Teaching:

Exam:

To be filled by the faculty reported upon


Report
On..Department.
..
Date of JoiningDesignation.........Scale of Pay and
Basic .
Academic Qualifications :( Include membership of professional institutions. Underline
qualifications obtained during the period of the report)

___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________--____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

1.

Details of work done:

Subjects
Taught
[Semester]

Total
No. of
lecture
s

Resul
t

Workin
g
Project
(s)
guided
(Nos.)

Paper
settin
g
(Nos.)

Evaluatio
n
(Name of
subjects)

Creation of
Teaching
Material
(Name of subject
and form)

2. Interaction with Student & Faculty:


a: Interaction with Student:
Whether the log is maintained: Y/N
Time table slot details:
b. Interaction with Faculty:
*Frequency of Meeting: W/F/M
No. of Meeting held/attended:

No. of Hours/week:

* Weekly/fortnightly/Monthly

_________________________________________________________________________________________________
Note:
Attach relevant documents in support of the information provided as an annexure (number annexure appropriately). The
term of reference mentioned is primarily for engineering institution; other Institutions shall use appropriate terminology, if
required.

3. Paper Publication Journals:[Mention Nos.]


Category A: Refereed Journals

Category B: Journals with good impact factor


Category C: New Journals, Launched Recently
Note: As per the list notified by the HoD.

Part A-continued
4. Paper Publication Conference:[Mention
2 Nos. ]
Conferences organized by

Category A: Institutes of National Importance (IITs, IIMs, IISc Bangalore, NITs)


Category B: Deemed Universities, NBA/NAAC Accredited Institutions,
Professional societies and other Govt. Institutions
Category C: Private Institutions

5. STTP/SDP Attended: Minimum One Week: [Mention Nos.]


[Applicable to UGC + MR Faculty members]

6. Workshop/Seminar/Conference Attended:[Mention Nos.]


Workshop:
Seminar:
Conference:

7.Details of Interaction held with outside World:


8. STTP/SDP/Workshop/Seminar/Conference conducted: [Mention Nos.]
Category A: Convener/Main In charge
Category B: In charge/Coordinator of any Committee
Category C: Member of any Committee

9. Sponsored Research: [Mention Nos.]


[Applicable to UGC + MR Faculty members]

Category A: In-house Proposal Submitted


Category B: In-house proposal Awarded
Category C: Proposal Submitted to MGI R & D Cell
For submission to external agency
Category D: Proposal Awarded by External Agency

10. Consultancy/Internal Revenue Generation [IRG]: [Mention Nos.]


[Applicable to UGC + MR Faculty members]

_________________________________________________________________________________________________
Note:
Attach relevant documents in support of the information provided as an annexure (number annexure appropriately). The
term of reference mentioned is primarily for engineering institution; other Institutions shall use appropriate terminology, if
required.

Category A: Project worth 3 Lacs


Category B: Project worth 2 Lacs
Category C: Project worth 1 Lacs
Category D: Project worth 25K

Part A-continued
3

11. Portfolio handled, Project [Grant Received], Guest Lecture:


Portfolios handled
(At
dept./Institute/Universi
ty level with
designation

Projects
(Grants received- Amount)

If Yes,
Amount

Guest Lecture
delivered
(In other
Institute)

Name of
the Funding Agency

12. Best Practices, Use of ICT, IPR related& Content beyond Syllabus:
Best Practices in
T/L process

Use of ICT

Efforts taken
related to IPR

Content
Beyond
Syllabus

13. Additional Work done related to (Give details):


AICTE

NBA

University
including
Officer In
charge,
Exam

Sanstha

Institution

Any other
(specify)

# Have you taken compensation for above said work


_________________________________________________________________________________________________
Note:
Attach relevant documents in support of the information provided as an annexure (number annexure appropriately). The
term of reference mentioned is primarily for engineering institution; other Institutions shall use appropriate terminology, if
required.

It is certified that the information provided is correct.


(Signature & Name of the
Faculty member)

_________________________________________________________________________________________________
Note:
Attach relevant documents in support of the information provided as an annexure (number annexure appropriately). The
term of reference mentioned is primarily for engineering institution; other Institutions shall use appropriate terminology, if
required.

Part - B

Appraisal by the Coordinator


[Please tick appropriate markings. Mark for points only those which you have verified and/or
have first-hand knowledge]

B.1: Quantitative Appraisal:


1. Teaching & Learning:
1. Average % Engagement of lectures [Excluding NS + Holiday]: Max. 6 Marks
6
(100 % & above)
(80-75%) 1
(74-70%)

(99-95%)

(94-90%) 3

(89-81%)

2. Average. % attendance of students in Class: Max. 6 Marks


6
(74-70%)

(100-96%)
1
(69-65%)

(95 90%) 4

(89-80%) 3

(79-75 %) 2

3. Average Syllabus Completion: Max. 6 Marks


6
75%) 1

(100-96%)
(74-70%)

(95-90%) 4

(89-85%) 3

(84-80%) 2

(79-

4. Average Feedback: Max. 6 Marks


6
(100-96%)
(74-70%) 1
(69 - 60%)

(95-90%) 4

5. Average Result of Subject(s) taught-Theory: Max.6 Marks


UG Programmes:
First Year Subjects
6
(100-90%)
5
(89-80%) 4
(59 -55%) 1
(54 -50%)
Second Year Subjects
6
(100-90%)
5
(89-80%)
4
(59 -55%) 1
(54 -50%)
Third Year Subjects
6
(100-96%)
5
(95-90%) 4
2
(69 -60%) 1
(59 -55%)
Final Year Subjects
6
(100-96%)
(79 -75%) 1
(74 -70%)

(95-90%) 4

(89-80%) 3

(79 - 70%)

(79-75%) 2

(79 - 70%)

(89 - 80%)

(89 - 85%)

(69-60%) 2

(69-60%) 2

(79-70%)

(84-80%)

PG Programmes:
First Year Subjects
_________________________________________________________________________________________________
Note:
Attach relevant documents in support of the information provided as an annexure (number annexure appropriately). The
term of reference mentioned is primarily for engineering institution; other Institutions shall use appropriate terminology, if
required.

6
(100-96%)
(69 -60%) 1
(59 -55%)

Final Year Subjects


6
(100-96%)
(79 -75%) 1
(74 -70%)

(95-90%) 4

(95-90%) 4

(89 - 80%)

(89 - 85%)

(79-70%)

(84-80%) 2

[Percentage of marks to be rounded off to higher integer. For ex...Faculty teaching 2 nd Year &
final year subjects: If the result of final year is 70% and result of 2nd year subject is 60% then
the marks obtained on these parameters have to be averaged i.e. 1+3/2=2]
Max
Marks:
30

Marks
Scored:

Max)
2. Student Interaction:(1 hour/subject/week as included in time table

Marks
Scored:

Part - B
Marks:
05

Based on the HODs observations done on fortnightly basis, the marks will be: [Tick
appropriately]
a. Log Maintained Properly; on continuous basis: 5 marks
b. Log maintained properly sometimes: 3 marks
c. Log not Maintained properly: 0 mark
Max
Marks
3. Faculty Interaction, Mentoring & Guidance (1 hour/week): [Tick
appropriately]

Number of meetings held= Number of Teaching weeks ( n )


a. 100 % Meetings Attended - 5 Marks
b. 80% Meetings Attended - 4 Marks
c. 70% Meetings Attended - 3 Marks
d. 60% Meetings Attended - 2 Marks
e. Less than 50% Meetings Attended- 1 Mark

4.Paper Publications-Journals:[Tick appropriately]


Category A: Refereed Journals like IEEE, ASME etc.
Category B: Journals with good impact factor
Category C: New Journals, Launched Recently

Marks:
05

Max
Marks:
20

Scored:

Marks
Scored:

Note: HoD has to notify category wise list in the beginning of the session.
a. 20 marks/paper in category A
b. 10 marks/paper in category B
c. 5 marks/paper in category C
Max
Marks
Marks:
Scored:
_________________________________________________________________________________________________
10

5.Paper Publications-Conferences:[Tick appropriately]

Note:
Attach relevant documents in support of the information provided as an annexure (number annexure appropriately). The
term of reference mentioned is primarily for engineering institution; other Institutions shall use appropriate terminology, if
required.

Conferences organized by Category A: Institutes of National Importance (IITs, IIMs, IISC Bangalore, NITs)
Category B: Deemed Universities, NBA/NAAC Accredited Institutions, Professional societies
and other Govt.
Institutions
Category C: Private Institutions
a. 10 marks/paper in category A
b. 05 marks/paper in category B
c. 03 marks/paper in category C

Part - B
[

6. Interaction with outside World as per NBA guidelines:

Max
Marks
Marks:
Scored:
10
Development/Guiding
project

Joint paper/Joint Research Project/Joint Consultancy/Curriculum


With Co-guide from the Industry/Co-guide of project from other dept/Institution/Other relevant
Interaction [please specify].
a.
b.
c.

Any three Interactions:


Any Two Interactions:
Any One Interaction:

10 Marks
8 Marks
5 Marks

7. STTP/SDP Attended: Category A: Min. 1 week:[10 marks]


[Applicable to UGC + MR Faculty members]

Max
Marks:
10

Marks
Scored:

Max
Marks:
05

Marks
Scored:

8. Seminar/Workshop attended: [Tick appropriately]


YES: 5 Marks

9. STTP/SDP/Workshop/Seminar/Conference organized:[Tick appropriately]


Max
Marks
a.
b.
c.

10. Sponsored Research:[Tick appropriately]


[Applicable to UGC + MR Faculty members]

a.
b.
c.
d.

Marks:

Convener/Main In charge
5 Marks 05
In charge/Coordinator of any Committee- 4 Marks
Member of any committee
3 Marks

In-house Proposal Submitted 5 Marks


In-house proposal Awarded 10 Marks
Proposal Submitted to MGI R & D Cell 10 Marks
For submission to external agency
Proposal Awarded by External Agency20 Marks

Max
Marks:
30

Scored:

Marks
Scored:

_________________________________________________________________________________________________
Note:
Attach relevant documents in support of the information provided as an annexure (number annexure appropriately). The
term of reference mentioned is primarily for engineering institution; other Institutions shall use appropriate terminology, if
required.

Max

11. Consultancy/Internal Revenue Generation (IRG): [Tick appropriately]


Marks:
[Applicable to UGC + MR Faculty members]

a.
b.
c.
d.
e.

Project
Project
Project
Project
Project

worth
worth
worth
worth
worth

10

3+Lacs2+Lacs1+ Lac
50 K+
25 K+

10 Marks
5 Marks
3 Marks
2 Marks
1 Mark

[Calculations: Category x No. of projects x marks]

Guest lecture delivered (in other institutes):

12.

Marks
Scored:

YES: 4 Marks

Max
Marks:
04

Marks
Scored:

Part - B

13. Portfolios handled (at the dept/Institute/university level):


Max
Marks:
05

YES: 5 Marks

Marks
Scored:

14. Efforts taken/Initiatives related to Intellectual Property Max


Rights asMarks
per
Scored:
Marks:
NBA:

Guidelines: Initiated: 10 Marks


15. Content beyond Syllabus:
5
4

One new experiment added beyond syllabus

10

Max
Marks:
05

Marks
Scored:

Two expert lectures taken beyond scheduled lectures (to be added in teaching
plan)
3

Additional measurement added in existing setup

2 One expert lecture taken beyond scheduled lectures (to be added in teaching plan)
1
Syllabus

Models/Charts/Simulations etc. prepared to demonstrate concepts beyond

Part -B

_________________________________________________________________________________________________
Note:
Attach relevant documents in support of the information provided as an annexure (number annexure appropriately). The
term of reference mentioned is primarily for engineering institution; other Institutions shall use appropriate terminology, if
required.

B.2: Subjective Appraisal:


Grades: 4 Very good, 3 Good, 2 Average, 1 Below Average
1.

2.

3.

Understanding &timely Completion of the responsibility given:


4
3
2
1
Organizing ability:
4
3
2
1
Ability to deal with subordinates& gets the best out of the subordinates :
4
3
2
1

4. Initiative taken to implement new ideas for qualitative improvement at deptt. Level:
4
5.

6.

Communication Skills:
4
3
Ability to work with colleagues:
4
3

1
2

1
1

Can be fully depended upon to fulfill the commitments:


4
3
2
1
8. Use of Best Practices:
4
3
2
1
9. Use of ICT:
Max
Marks
4
3
2
1
Marks:
Scored:
__________________________________________________________________________________________
36
_
7.

PART C
APPRAISAL SUMMARY C.1 UGC + MR

Name & Dept. of the faculty member:


S.N.

B.1

APPRAISAL PARAMETERS

MAXIMUM
MARKS

MARKS
SCORED

Quantitative Appraisal:

_________________________________________________________________________________________________
Note:
Attach relevant documents in support of the information provided as an annexure (number annexure appropriately). The
term of reference mentioned is primarily for engineering institution; other Institutions shall use appropriate terminology, if
required.

1.

Teaching & Learning

30

2.

Student Interaction

05

3.

Faculty Interaction, Mentoring & Guidance

4.

Paper Publications-Journals

20

5.

Paper Publications-Conferences

10

6.

Interaction with Outside World

10

7.

STTP/SDP Attended

10

8.

Seminar/Workshop attended

05

9.

STTP/SDP/Workshop/Seminar/Conference organized

05

10.

Sponsored Research

30

11.

Consultancy/Internal Revenue Generation (IRG)

10

12.

Guest lecturer delivered (in other institutes)

04

13.

Portfolios handled (at the deptt/Institute/university level) with


designation

05

14.

Efforts taken/Initiatives related to Intellectual Property Rights

10

15.

Content beyond Syllabus

05

Total
B.2

164

Subjective Appraisal:

36
Total Score

Over & Above weightage [Documentary evidence


to be attached]

05

Honorary consultancy
Paper
publication/Projects/Consultancy
in
Thrust
areas[Dept.]
Monograms, Books, Chapters
Patent Awarded
Faculty In charge for students Summer Industrial
Training
Ph.D. Qualification
Ph.D. pursuing

Total Marks Scored

200

/200

05
05
05
15
05
10
05

/200

_________________________________________________________________________________________________
Note:
Attach relevant documents in support of the information provided as an annexure (number annexure appropriately). The
term of reference mentioned is primarily for engineering institution; other Institutions shall use appropriate terminology, if
required.

Name & Dept. of the faculty member:

Overall Grading

Marks [out of 200]

Outstanding

90%

180

Excellent

80%

160

Very Good

70% 140

Satisfactory

60%

120

Average

55%

110

Below Average

< 55%

<110

<Signature & Name of the Assessing


Officer>

Concurrence of the Principal: Do you agree with the assessment of the assessing
officer: YES / NO

If no, reasons thereof.

<Signature of the Principal/Director>


[Seal]

_________________________________________________________________________________________________
Note:
Attach relevant documents in support of the information provided as an annexure (number annexure appropriately). The
term of reference mentioned is primarily for engineering institution; other Institutions shall use appropriate terminology, if
required.

PART C
APPRAISAL SUMMARY C.2 Other Category

Name & Dept. of the faculty member:


S.N.

B.1

APPRAISAL PARAMETERS

MAXIMUM
MARKS

MARKS
SCORED

Quantitative Appraisal:
1.

Teaching & Learning

30

2.

Student Interaction

05

3.

Faculty Interaction, Mentoring & Guidance

4.

Paper Publications-Journals

20

5.

Paper Publications-Conferences

10

6.

Interaction with Outside World

7.

Seminar/Workshop attended

05

8.

STTP/SDP/Workshop/Seminar/Conference organized

05

9.

Guest Lecture delivered

04

10.

Portfolios handled (at the deptt/Institute/university level) with


designation

11.

Efforts taken/Initiatives related to Intellectual Property Rights

10

12.

Content beyond Syllabus

05

10

Total
B.
2

05

05

114

Subjective Appraisal:
36
Total Score
Over & Above weightage [Documentary evidence
to be attached]

Honorary consultancy
Paper
publication/Projects/Consultancy
in
Thrust
areas[Dept.]
Monograms, Books, Chapters
Patent Awarded
Faculty In charge for students Summer Industrial
Training
Ph.D. pursuing

150

/150

05
05
05
15
05
05

_________________________________________________________________________________________________
Note:
Attach relevant documents in support of the information provided as an annexure (number annexure appropriately). The
term of reference mentioned is primarily for engineering institution; other Institutions shall use appropriate terminology, if
required.

Total Marks Scored

/150

Name & Dept. of the faculty member:

Overall Grading

Marks [out of 150 ]

Outstanding

90%

135

Excellent

80%

120

Very Good

70% 105

Satisfactory

60%

90

Average

55%

82.5

Below Average

< 55%

<82.5

<Signature & Name of the Assessing


Officer>

Concurrence of the Principal: Do you agree with the assessment of the assessing
officer: YES / NO

If no, reasons thereof.

<Signature of the Principal/Director>


[Seal]

_________________________________________________________________________________________________
Note:
Attach relevant documents in support of the information provided as an annexure (number annexure appropriately). The
term of reference mentioned is primarily for engineering institution; other Institutions shall use appropriate terminology, if
required.

_________________________________________________________________________________________________
Note:
Attach relevant documents in support of the information provided as an annexure (number annexure appropriately). The
term of reference mentioned is primarily for engineering institution; other Institutions shall use appropriate terminology, if
required.

You might also like