Brad Kempo B.A. LL.B.
Barrister & Solicitor [Alberta, Inactive]
914 950 Drake Avenue
Vancouver, British Columbia,
Canada V6Z 2B9
Ph. 604.609.0520
[email protected]Your File #: OTP-CR-274/10
October 6, 2010
International Criminal Court
Information and Evidence Unit
Office of the Prosecutor
2500 CM The Hague
The Netherlands
Attention: M.P. Dillon, Head of Information & Evidence Unit
Dear Sir/Madam:
Re: Submission Pursuant to Article 15(1) Complaint
In this final submission* I describe two circumstances that add more to the
category of guilty conscience evidence already delivered in previous
correspondence. Both relate to how those perpetuating the non-transparent
constituent of Canadian governance and advancing the R&D, deployment and
proliferation of stealth cognition technologies (SCT) sought to punish and
disincentive me for seeking justice and bona fide reform and accountability.
In Canadian law the following constitutes guilty conscience evidence:
* Except for whats to be posted in the New Supplementals section of the coalition website
2
R. v. White [Supreme Court of Canada] [1998] 2 S.C.R. 72
Major J.
Under certain circumstances, the conduct of an accused after a crime has
been committed may provide circumstantial evidence of the accuseds
culpability for that crime. [] As Weiler J.A. noted in R. v. Peavoy (1997),
117 C.C.C. (3d) 226 (Ont. C.A.), at p. 238:
Evidence of after-the-fact conduct is commonly admitted to show
that an accused person has acted in a manner which, based on
human experience and logic, is consistent with the conduct of a
guilty person and inconsistent with the conduct of an innocent
person.
[C]onsciousness of guilt evidence ... is introduced to show that the
accused was aware of having committed the crime in question and acted
for the purpose of evading detection and prosecution.
Source: http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/1998/1998scr2-72/1998scr2-72.html
Where those who violate the criminal law flee the scene, hide from authorities,
destroy or fabricate evidence, threaten witnesses or tamper with juries, leaders of
non-democratic systems of government in the face of reform and accountability
initiatives are widely known to imprison, effect committal in psych wards, torture,
kill and threaten to kill or maim political dissidents.
The year 2004 was eventful both domestically and internationally. On February
19th I sought political asylum in the United States to escape the intensification of
criminality and SCT-related human rights abuses after the transfer of Liberal
government leadership from Prime Minister Chrtien to Prime Minister Martin
(both lawyers) and mitigate threats against my safety. Upon my return I
resumed prosecuting the Federal Court lawsuit and commenced the research.
3
Unannounced to me in 2003 and not known until May and July of 04 was what
were in the geo-political pipeline that would more substantially create the
diplomatic back-channel. The first major initiative was the release of the
exceptionally coercive film Dogville (http://dogville.synthasite.com and
http://dogville-revisited.yolasite.com).
The second was the re-release of the 1962 movie The Manchurian Candidate in
late July, which is about the use of mind control for nefarious political purposes
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Manchurian_Candidate_(2004_film). This re-injected
the issue of Canadas SCT program into the geo-political discourse after
originally being introduced in early January 04 by way of the critically acclaimed
weekly American television drama series about the White House called The
West Wing (info: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_West_Wing and diplomacy:
http://westwing.synthasite.com). The very first entry in the chapter documenting
the shows diplomacy begins with:
The January 7, 2004, episode of The West Wing was entitled The Stormy
Present. It was an episode producers dedicated to what the Canadian elite and
Chinese had done to the Canadian lawyer for almost twenty-years. It lay at the
core of not only his pain, suffering and massive economic losses, but also
diplomatically articulated a geo-political nightmare that threatened the stability of
the free world. Where there had been a nuclear stalemate that saved democracy
from an encroaching Soviet paradigm of governance, the new cognitive
disruption and manipulation technologies of the late 20th century would empower
the last remaining communist elephant, which could surreptitiously begin to
undermine Western political, military and economic strength.
In the first relevant scene, C.J. Craig, then White House Press Secretary, has
just completed a press briefing when she is approached by a reporter.
Reporter: C.J., a source in the Pentagon says the militarys funding mind
control experiments.
4
These two undertakings cumulatively with my asylum application, lawsuit and
research angered Canadas political and corporate leadership; causing it to show
me and original members of the coalition there was going to be no cessation of
what was then a decade and a half of SCT experimentation. In late summer it
effected two initiatives to send us this message.
The first was to fabricate evidence of welfare fraud. I had been on the dole since
being forced out of my law practice 11 years earlier. My social worker called
me into her office in late July to advise she was in receipt of a complaint and
proof Id been traveling to Europe, which to her demonstrated I had funds that
werent being declared. My entitlement was immediately terminated. This
allegation was obviously manufactured since Id been languishing in abject
poverty since the early 1990s to advance the SCT R&D program.
The second occurred on the second Friday in August. Early evening I got a
knock on my apartment door. I was confronted by two uniformed Vancouver
Police officers who confirmed my name and my professional status. One of them
was holding a very thick wad of documents. I was advised they were instructed
to take me into custody for stalking a local television personality and the proof
was said to be e-mails I sent her seeking her amorous attention. Immediately I
concluded they were fabricated. Also of serious concern was the fact they
werent ordered to deliver me to the police station lock-up where Id have access
to a Justice of the Peace for the purpose of posting bond and release. I was told
5
they were to escort me to a psychiatric ward and have me involuntarily
incarcerated pursuant to provincial mental health legislation. This is an
environment in which there is no release. Additionally, such a committal
instantly destroys ones professional and academic credibility.
I went into professional defence mode to convince the two officers I was being
framed. I showed them the 168-page Amended Statement of Claim
(http://coalition.synthasite.com/st-cl.php), arguing I was embroiled in litigation with
the federal government involving serious issues of corruption, criminality and
human rights violations and conducting research. I also indicated that I didnt
even watch local television because my interests were exclusively international
and only watched American TV. And I pressed them on how computer forensics
would have proven my innocence.
Its a fair inference that when the two officers entered my home they had already
a general impression of what theyd find that would further justify committal.
However, upon stepping into my apartment they saw an upscale, very tidy
residence and someone who acted calmly and intelligently in the face of the
allegation. They left forty minutes later. Undeniably my asylum application,
lawsuit, research and the two films had struck a nerve.
These two experiences also helped inform my research especially the latter
one for the use of psych wards for political purposes was what the Soviets had
6
done and Chinese were still doing during this time; and thus for this practice to
occur in Canada was revelatory of a totalitarian paradigm of governance:
China: End Political Abuse of Psychiatry
Human Rights Watch
August 13, 2002
New York [] In a 298-page report, "Dangerous Minds: Political
Psychiatry in China Today and its Origins in the Mao Era," Human Rights
Watch and the Geneva Initiative on Psychiatry, a Netherlands-based
international foundation, compare the treatment of dissidents in mental
asylums to similar abuses in the former Soviet Union.
These two events were also considered evidence that the countrys political
leadership and the Chinese were seeking with unlawful means to halt that which
jeopardized and would expose more of the SCT program.
It was around this time I discovered the CSIS-RCMP Sidewinder Report. I began
what became a five-month investigation into what appeared to be a non-
transparent relationship between China and Canada. With the Government of
China (PRC) emerging out of its self-imposed isolation at the end of the Cold
War (late 1980s) and yet by the time the Report was authored had so
substantially penetrated the Canadian marketplace, it was logical that (i) these
economic interests were present back to the 1970s and 1980s and (ii) entered
the country at a time when everything communist was antithetical to western
values and beliefs. Therefore there must have been very high-level political and
corporate antecedents. The hypothesis was borne out by the evidence. After
almost a half year of research it was concluded an authoritarian paradigm of
governance was operating behind a faade of democracy and the Chinese
7
communists were welcomed with open arms in the 1970s because of (i) an
ideological affinity with Canadas political and corporate leaders and (ii) a shared
hatred from what the Americans and NATO Alliance were battling the Soviet
Union over the global spread of democracy, rule of law, transparency,
accountability, human rights and free markets. Canadas leaders didnt believe in
any of these. To them it was all about maintaining consolidated power, hoarding
ever-increasing amounts of wealth and in the 1990s the PRCs global ambitions.
By early December 04 I concluded PRC joint governance of the country had
been a reality since the late 1970s and its political and economic interests were
being surreptitiously protected by Canadas leaders and the courts. So I
decided to begin circulating my research findings to various people in
government and administration of justice. A result of (i) being a multi-decade
SCT experimentation victim (ii) prosecuting the lawsuit (iii) having triggered an
international incident with my political asylum application and (iv) international
diplomacy, everything I was doing viz. the research project was being monitored
with an electron microscope by those who had everything to gain by keeping
unlawful and unconstitutional policies and practices secret as had been
successfully the case for thirty years.
These chronologically arranged digital photos of Fax Cover Sheets comprise a
significant sampling of who was contacted in December 04 and January 05.
Note the number of pages identified as sent in the bottom right corner.
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
* On Enbridge and China see http://rcc-newsitem3-25-10.yolasite.com
25
26
In addition to these disseminations I aggressively sought out some of the
wealthiest, most influential individuals in the province. Three of them were
Directors of the citys world fair, Expo 86 (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Expo_86).
One of the three my father knew back to the early 1970s. So when I discovered
the real reason for a decade and a half of professional and entrepreneurial failure
and being an SCT victim I called him on it. After a heated telephone discussion I
received this voicemail message on January 20th:
Brad, its Uncle Herb, and Uncle Herb doesnt like to get that type
of phone call. You should understand that; that you never should
go down that route with me and I would like to hear from you as to
what you think this is going to do. And lets avoid all these
problems that you are starting to create before they go any further.
I think it would be in your best interests to give me a call. The
best place is probably to call me at home during the afternoon or
in the evening. If I dont hear from you shortly Ill have to take
some action. Call me.
Who is Uncle Herb? The multi-millionaires bio is posted at:
http://www.orderofbc.gov.bc.ca/members/obc-2008/2008-herb-capozzi
Additionally, I began showing up at the office of another director, multi-billionaire
Jimmy Pattison. In 2005 Forbes Magazine ranked him as the 107th wealthiest in
the world. And that same year a Canadian business magazine pegged him at
number five in this country. In late January 05 the security apparatus arranged
for him to walk into my path in the lobby when I was going to deliver more of the
research being faxed around the country. Supplementals on him are posted at
27
(i) http://chinadabidencashinreaction.synthasite.com
(ii) http://fiefdom-king-pattison.yolasite.com
(iii) http://dogville-pattison-chinadacomplicity.yolasite.com
(iv) http://chinadamalfeasance2.yolasite.com
And the third of the three directors, the founder and head of national investment
house Canaccord Capital Corp.s Peter Brown, instructed his lawyers to meet
with me after speaking to him, where I followed up on what had been faxed over.
Early evening on the first Friday of February 05 I got a knock on the door. Some
eight to ten Vancouver police officers entered my apartment and this time
effected the involuntary incarceration. I was escorted to St. Pauls psychiatric
ward where I was examined by an ethnic Chinese physician who spent no more
than 4-5 minutes asking me questions before signing the committal papers.
There was a computer in the ward so I kept a detailed record of my
circumstances. Dr. Johnathan Fung states on the incarceration form:
1. In my opinion, this person: has a disorder of the mind that requires treatment
and which seriously impairs the persons ability to react appropriately to
his/her environment or to associate with others (section 1 of the Mental
Health Act); and
2. In my opinion, this person:
(a) requires treatment in or through a designated facility; and
(b) requires care, supervision and control in or through a designated
facility to prevent his/her substantial mental or physical deterioration
or for the protection of the person or for the protection of others; and
(c) cannot suitably be admitted as a voluntary patient.
28
[]
Patient presents as very psychotic with elaborate delusions of persecution by
numerous government officials. No insight. Needs hospitaliza-tion for
assessment and treatment.
Dr. Campbell, thereafter assigned for a brief time to my case, writes in her report:
This patient is acutely psychotic with no insight. He has intense paranoid
beliefs re: RCMP, CSIS.
Upon committal I was immediately prescribed powerful anti-psychotic drugs.
Then a week later the medication regime changed. What had been administered
in a staggered fashion throughout the morning, afternoon and evening were
given to me all at once. This had a profoundly debilitating effect on my ability to
walk, talk, eat, sleep and think properly. I documented everything that happened,
including how my body reacted to this change in medication procedure: internal
bleeding. During each bowel movement the toilet bowl filled with blood.
The statute regulating my predicament required there be a review of my
committal in three weeks. So I called in a lawyer friend of mine, Milan Uzelac,
and we presented a defence to further incarceration. However, the hearing was
rigged with handpicked panel members and I was recommitted.
When the malfeasant parties decided Id been taught a lesson, I was released.
Because my mother believed the medical libel she made her ongoing financial
support conditional on staying enrolled in counselling as required by the psych
ward physician. The doctors I was handed off to continued to prescribe powerful
29
medications which perpetuated the vegetable state I was in. Not until July was I
able to persuade my mother the drugs were no longer needed. By then I had
been so saturated with anti-psychotics it took a couple more months to flush
them out of my system. In total I lost seven months of my life to this
unlawfulness and guilty conscience evidence.
The diplomacy revved up when I fully recovered (http://signposts.synthasite.com,
item v) and in January 2006 newly elected Prime Minister Harper didnt capitulate
to what the original members of the coalition demanded. The archive
demonstrates how diplomatically coercive the communiqus were in early 06
and being generated by an increasingly large number of public and private sector
parties in the United States and throughout the world.
A third knock on the door came in June 2007. Even knowing I was acting as an
agent for the coalition the countrys leadership figured it could use me as a
diplomatic punching bag. This time the attempt at psych ward incarceration was
triggered by what is documented in Coalition Three Times Accuse the China-
Canada Military Alliance of Planning a Nuclear Bomb Detonation on American
Soil (http://chinadanukethreat.synthasite.com). The difference however was that the
admitting physician was Caucasian and as part of his evaluation reviewed the
records kept of my February 05 committal. He stated there was nothing in the
medical documentation that warranted incarceration or administration of
30
medication; that there was no final diagnosis of mental illness in the file. I was
released and in possession of more guilty conscience evidence.
The malfeasant parties knew who they were dealing with a lawyer and whose
mother was a federal judge for thirteen years and an uncle a senator for twenty-
four. Being treated this way, what kind of protections do Canadians without that
professional status and family pedigree have from egregious abuses of political
power? Additionally, the evidence is undeniable that this State behavior is to be
proliferated by the PRC and Canadas elite as they expand their global sphere of
control and influence. With the legal profession constituting an accountability
mechanism in democracies and emerging democracies, lawyers are vulnerable
and must be protected from this kind of unlawfulness to ensure governments
corrupted by Chinas political and economic influences are accountable.
As U.S. President Obama acknowledged the fifth anniversary of my political
asylum application (http://obamacanadavisit.synthasite.com) so too did coalition
partners the fifth anniversary of the August 2004 committal attempt:
http://coalitiondiplomacy8-21-09.yolasite.com.
The second set of circumstances that demonstrate the true nature of the
Canadian State and protecting SCT R&D, deployment and proliferation involves
an extension of the edification of government on three levels and the
31
administration of justice (Bench, Bar, law enforcement, attorneys general) that
began in August 2007 and concluded in July 2009.
During the third week of November 09 I began a new initiative that targeted the
private sector. I began calling the largest, wealthiest companies in the country,
but not to edify because they were part of the problem. Rather to deliver formal
notice on behalf of my clients that a failure to capitulate to their demands
attracted serious consequences. I documented these contacts at:
(i) http://power-corporation.yolasite.com
(ii) http://coalitiondiplomacy11-24-09.yolasite.com
(iii) http://triangle-of-power-wealth2.yolasite.com
(v) http://edifying-investment-firms.yolasite.com
(vi) http://edifying-investment-firms2.yolasite.com
The malfeasant parties reacted to this undertaking in various ways. One
wouldnt be discovered for some eight months. It was observed when ICC
culpability assessments against owners and executives of the countrys largest
corporations were being authored: The Triangle of Power and Wealth Confesses
Again to the R&D, Deployment and Proliferation of Stealth Cognition
Technologies (http://chinada-sct-confession.yolasite.com).
Here are a few of the 36 pages of notes I kept:
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
This late November 09 launched undertaking was detested by Canadas political
and corporate leaders and their Chinese partners and they again lashed out. On
December 3rd the Law Society of Alberta of which I am a member was instructed
to commence disciplinary proceedings and put me on notice that upon conviction
I would be disbarred.
At the time the head of the Conduct (aka disciplinary) Committee was ethnic
Chinese Douglas R. Mah QC:
The QC designation is widely known in Canada not to be only awarded for
meritorious service but also and more often for political reasons. Some four
months after the disciplinary charges were laid he was elected next president of
39
the Law Society. Contextualizing his ethnicity in terms of previous presidents of
both the Law Society of Alberta and British Columbia is described in the Reform
Coalition of Canadas chapter The Evidence Speaks for Itself: Part
II (http://evidence-speaks2.yolasite.com).
Its an easy and logical inference that his role as Chairman of the committee was
to prepare him for the top job so he would be observed by the PRC and its
military and intelligence personnel as being at the pinnacle of one critical
institution of the administration of justice, the legal profession, while another
ethnic Chinese, Lt. Governor Norman Kwong, is observed to be at the top of the
political heap (http://ltgov-alberta-resignation.yolasite.com). These appointments
were motivated by the same reason as Prime Minister Chrtiens 1999 choice for
Governor General of Canada and Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces:
Chinese-born Adrienne Clarkson aka Wu Bingzhi. Kwong and Mah helped the
Chinese get their claws more deeply in the largest oil deposit in the world second
only to Saudi Arabia (http://www.energy.alberta.ca/OurBusiness/oilsands.asp).
On September 29th, 2010 the hearing was held and the panel of three
handpicked Benchers, two of them QCs, found me guilty on all counts the
charge being that I was not allowed to use the designation Barrister & Solicitor,
Inactive when contacting recipients of my treatise research. Complainants
include a Liberal senator, the executive assistant to the Canadian ambassador to
40
China, the president of the Canadian Bankers Association and several law
societies.
Just before I commenced the edification initiative in August 07 I reviewed the
Alberta Legal Profession Act and Law Society Rules to discover there was
nothing regulating the use of that designation. The statute only said that I could
not hold myself out as an active member of the Bar and the Rules were silent.
Thus, the use of the term inactive. Consequently, I have been convicted for
that which there is no law or regulation. I argued this in my written submission:
Democracies require that punishment be accorded where there is a
violation of an existing rule; only in tyrannies, dictatorships and
communist states do individuals experience punishment for infractions of
unknown or unknowable laws and rules.
What the Law Society is doing now is a continuation of what it was involved in
twenty years ago when helping to facilitate SCT experimentation. Those
circumstances were pled in the Federal Court lawsuit (para. 65) and never
challenged for credibility: East of the Rock and West of the Hard Place in the
Last Democratic Fiefdom (http://albertalawsocietycomplicity.synthasite.com). The
causes of action also included the tort of abuse of disciplinary process and libel.
In How the Law Societies of Alberta and British Columbia Conspired With China
and the Last Democratic Fiefdom (http://lawsociety-alberta-bc-
complicity.synthasite.com) I describe how the two law societies conspired to keep
me out of the practice of law to advance the SCT program.
41
A compilation of all these matters and more is in One Institutionalized Way to
Protect Political Power Consolidation Gains and Chinese Militarization, Satisfy
Schadenfreude Addictions and Effect Surreptitious Assassination Without
Culpability: Procuring Year-After-Year Crushing Embarrassment and Humiliation
(http://crushingembarrassment.synthasite.com).
The eight count disciplinary citation is posted at http://lawsociety.yolasite.com. My
evidence and written submission to the panel and how the coalition reacted to
the conviction are posted at http://lawsociety4.yolasite.com. The panels reasons
for conviction and its sentencing disposition will be posted in the New
Supplementals section of the coalition website when rendered.
My two decades of SCT legal profession related circumstances resonate most
intensely within the American public sector constituent of the coalition because of
whos at the helm of the Government of the United States: Obama, Obama,
Biden & Clinton: Four Lawyers Inhabit the White House and What That Means
for the Reform and Demilitarization of Canada's Administration of Justice
(http://obamaobamabidenclinton.synthasite.com).
Best regards,
Brad Kempo, Barrister & Solicitor
