Balancing of CHILLED water distribution systems:
ENERGY efficiency case study
How PICVs can deliver a more sustainable solution
for a greener world
Prepared by Luca Baroli
Agenda
Introduction of technology
Fundamentals of technology
Feasibility, payback and lifecycle cost analysis
Prepared
Prepared by
by Luca
Luca Baroli
Baroli
Agenda
Introduction of technology
Fundamentals of technology
Feasibility, payback and lifecycle cost analysis
Prepared
Prepared by
by Luca
Luca Baroli
Baroli
PICV
Pressure Independent and Control Valve
PIBCV
Pressure Independent Balancing Control Valve
Prepared by Luca Baroli
Application fields:
Heating and cooling of buildings and other facilities, by means of water-
based heat exchanger, where flow and temperature control of air and
water is required.
Examples:
Fan Coil Units FCU
Air Handling Units AHU
Chilled beams CB
Air curtains
Heating/cooling interface units
Heat exchangers
Prepared by Luca Baroli
What is a PICV?
Prepared by Luca Baroli
What is a PICV?
(Pressure Independent Control Valve)
- A combined flow limiter and control valve for heat emitters (FCU, AHU, CB )
- Automatic flow limiter
- Pre-settable maximum flow rate
- Two ports control valve
Because of integrated DPCV, control valve has best authority: at partial load, the
system has no influence on temperature regulation as it will have with normal
control valves.
Q = Kv
Prepared
Prepared by
by Luca
Luca Baroli
Baroli
Typical Pressure Independent and Control Valve
Prepared by Luca Baroli
How a PICV works
The Pressure Independent Control Valve (PICV) has
three internal functional groups:
Temperature control
Flow rate limitation
Pressure regulator
Flow rate limitation and temperature control can be combined in some valves
Prepared by Luca Baroli
Differential Pressure (P) Regulator
The P regulator is
the heart of the
pressure independent
control valve
Its primary function is
to keep a constant
differential pressure
between P2 and P3,
regardless of the
instantaneous
pressure difference
between P1 and P3
Prepared by Luca Baroli
Differential Pressure Regulator
P1 and P3 are
transmitted to
opposing sides of the
diaphragm
Pressure P2-P3 is the
equilibrium point of
the regulator
If P1 >P2-P3 shutter P2
A closes on seat B
A
If P1 <P2-P3 shutter P1 P3
A opens away from
B
seat B
Prepared by Luca Baroli
Flow Rate Limitation
Flow rate is determined by
formula
Q = Pv Kv
If P (P2-P3) is constant
flow rate is only dependent on
area of passage (Kv)
Area of passage is changed
linearly in relation to the hand
wheel setting
Prepared by Luca Baroli
Temperature Control
Globe valve acts against seat Pvalve
Authority (n) is defined as the n=
pressure drop across the ( P2 P3 )
valve divided by pressure
drop across system, in this
special case we know that
the pressure drop across the
valve is held constant (P2-
P3) and is almost the same
as the total pressure drop
across the valve
Hence authority is very close
to 1
Flow rate is dependent on
stem position (controlled by
actuator)
Prepared by Luca Baroli
3 way control
FCU valves
Authority calculation
FCU
Complex pipeline
Need for commissioning
High capital cost
FCU
High running cost
FCU
Chiller
Pump
Prepared by Luca Baroli
Differential pressure transducer
DPCV 2 way control
FCU valves
Authority calculation
FCU Need for commissioning
High capital cost (DPCV)
FCU
FCU
Chiller
VFD-Pump
Prepared by Luca Baroli
Pressure Differential Sensor
FCU
Pressure Independent
Control Valve
FCU
P
FCU
Authority calculation
Complex pipeline
FCU
Need for commissioning
High running cost
Chiller
VFD-Pump
Prepared by Luca Baroli
Agenda
Introduction of technology
Fundamentals of technology
Feasibility, payback and lifecycle cost analysis
Prepared
Prepared by
by Luca
Luca Baroli
Baroli
What is a PICV?
Dynamic curve
2 Main key features
Control curve
Prepared by Luca Baroli
Pressure Differential Sensor
FCU
Pressure Independent
Control Valve
FCU
P
FCU
Authority calculation
Complex pipeline
FCU
Need for commissioning
High running cost
Chiller
VFD-Pump
Prepared by Luca Baroli
Axial PICV
Fluid dynamic curve L
800
700
560 l/h
590 l/h
600
500
rate
520 l/h
Portata l/h
400
Flow
300
200
100
0
0 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000 12000
P
Prepared
Prepared by
by Luca
Luca Baroli
Baroli
What Control Characteristic is Preferred?
100
90
Thermal Output (%)
80
70
60
50
40
Power Output 30
20
10
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Control Signal (%)
Prepared by Luca Baroli
Coil Characteristics
100
90 0.05
80 0.15
0.25
70 0.4
Energy (%)
0.6
60 0.8
1
50 Application a-Value
40 Pre Heating 0.25 to 0.4
Coil
30
Heating Coil 0.15 to 0.4
20
Cooling Coil 0.25 to 0.5
10 Radiators 0.5 to 0.65
Converters 0.5 3.0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Flow (%)
Prepared by Luca Baroli
Valve Characteristic
100
90
Characteristic of
Flow, Thermal Output (%)
80
Coil
70
60
50
Characteristic of
40
Control Valve
Power Output 30
20
10
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Flow, Signal (%)
Prepared by Luca Baroli
Valve Characteristic
IEC 60534 1 2 3 4
ANSI/ISA-75.01.01-2007
Prepared by Luca Baroli
Valve Characteristic
Source
Prepared by Luca Baroli
Select Equal Percentage
Characteristic
Prepared by Luca Baroli
Select Equal Percentage
Characteristic
Prepared by Luca Baroli
Control curve
Prepared
Prepared by
by Luca
Luca Baroli
Baroli
Flow rate verification
FO-PICV vs VO-PICV
Prepared by Luca Baroli
Current verification method
Fixed Orifice
Pressure Independent and Control Valve
FO-PICV use of Venturi fittings allow better
measurement performances
Varible Orifice (offered by some players)
Pressure Independent and Control Valve
VO-PICV measure Kv across control valve
10 min error
Prepared by Luca Baroli
VO-PICV
Prepared by Luca Baroli
FO-PICV Example
Prepared by Luca Baroli
Advantage: better accuracy
Prepared by Luca Baroli
FO-PICV
P3 P4
FLOW = P3 P4 K vs
Kvs = constant
Agenda
Introduction of technology
Fundamentals of technology
Feasibility, payback and lifecycle cost analysis
Prepared
Prepared by
by Luca
Luca Baroli
Baroli
Agenda
ASSESSMENT OF ALTERNATIVE VALVE SOLUTIONS
FOR HEATING AND CHILLED WATER SYSTEMS
Prepared
Prepared by
by Luca
Luca Baroli
Baroli
Agenda
Introduction
Summary background
The writer
Valve terminology
Case study system layouts
Findings
Discussion
Pump energy consumption
Control performance
Conclusions
Prepared by Luca Baroli
The Author
Chris Parsloe
BSc (Hons) CEng MCIBSE
on behalf of
Pettinaroli S.p.A.
Prepared by Luca Baroli
This report was compiled by Chris Parsloe of Parsloe Consulting Ltd.
Chris is an independent consultant with 30 years of experience in
building services. He is author of the following industry design guides
which are relevant to the issues discussed in this report:
CIBSE KS 7: Variable Flow Pipework Systems
CIBSE KS 9: Commissioning of Variable Flow Pipework Systems
CIBSE Commissioning Code W 2010: Water distribution Systems
BSRIA BG 2/2010: Commissioning Water Systems
Prepared by Luca Baroli
This report provides an assessment of three
pipework systems with different valve
solutions for the control of heating or cooling
outputs from terminal devices. The aim of
the comparison is to establish which valve
solution provides the best performance in
terms of pump energy consumption, and
controllability.
Prepared by Luca Baroli
The 4PV system
(4 port valve system)
The DPCV system
(differential pressure control valve system)
The PICV system
(pressure independent control valve system)
Prepared by Luca Baroli
Prepared by Luca Baroli
4PV system
- Constant volume
- Manual balancing
Prepared by Luca Baroli
Prepared by Luca Baroli
Prepared by Luca Baroli
Prepared by Luca Baroli
DPCV system
- Variable volume
- Manual balancing
- DPCV on risers
Prepared by Luca Baroli
Prepared by Luca Baroli
Prepared by Luca Baroli
Prepared by Luca Baroli
Prepared by Luca Baroli
PICV system
- Variable volume
- Automatic balancing
Prepared by Luca Baroli
Prepared by Luca Baroli
Prepared by Luca Baroli
Prepared by Luca Baroli
System parameters Values
Levels 5
Terminal devices units per level 40
Total number of terminal devices 200
Spacing between branches and sub-branches 3m
Height between floor slabs 3m
Heating/cooling output per terminal device 2kW
Design delta T for terminal devices 6C
Pressure loss across terminal devices 5000Pa
Distance between pump and most remote terminal device 140m
Flow rate per terminal device 0.08kg/s
Total design flow rate through system 15.9kg/s
Limiting pressure loss per metre used for pipe sizing 250Pa/m
Prepared by Luca Baroli
Pump speed control:
For the 4PV system, it is assumed that there is no variation in pump
speed pump flow and pressure remain approximately constant at all
times.
For the DPCV system it is assumed that pump speed will be varied so
as to maintain a constant differential pressure across the pipework
adjacent to the most remote DPCV.
For the PICV system, it is assumed that pump speed will be varied to
maintain a constant differential pressure across the pipework at a
point two thirds of the way (in terms of pressure loss) along the index
circuit (this being the circuit feeding to the most remote terminal unit).
Prepared by Luca Baroli
4PV system
Component/feature Pressure loss (kPa)
Index terminal device 5.0
Index terminal 4PV 8.2
Note: 4 port valve sized to achieve authority
relative to terminal loss of 5kPa
Index terminal DRV/OP 2.4
Pipeline DRV/OPs 2.7
Strainers 2.8
NRV 5.2
Pipework and fittings 76.6 (271Pa/m)
Total 103.3
Authority of 4PV = 0,62
Kv of 4PV = 1
Prepared by Luca Baroli
DPCV system
Component/feature Pressure loss (kPa)
Index terminal device 5.0
Index terminal 2PV 20.7
Note: 2 port valve sized to achieve authority
relative to DPCV controlled pressure of 36.7kPa
Index terminal DRV/OP 2.4
DPCV 30.0
Note: DPCV loss necessary to enable DPCV to
operate with authority.
Pipeline OPs 6.3
Strainers 2.8
NRV 5.2
Pipework and fittings 77.4 (274 Pa/m)
Total 141.8
Authority of 2PV = 0,56
Kv of 2PV = 0,64
Prepared by Luca Baroli
PICV system
Component/feature Pressure loss (kPa)
Index terminal device 5.0
Index terminal PICV 25.0
Note: PICV loss necessary to enable PICV to
operate within its range.
Index terminal OP 2.4
Pipeline OPs 2.7
Strainers 2.8
NRV 5.2
Pipework and fittings 80.5 (285Pa/m)
Total 123.6
Prepared by Luca Baroli
Maximum, minimum and 50% load operating points for example systems
Max load Min load 50% load
System (see Note 1) (see Note 2) (see Note 3)
4PV system 103.3kPa @ 15.9l/s 103.3kPa @ 15.9l/s 103.3kPa @ 15.9l/s
DPCV system 141.8kPa @ 16.6l/s 63.8kPa @ 0.7l/s 83.3kPa @ 8.3l/s
PICV system 123.6kPa @ 16.6l/s 42.3kPa @ 0.7l/s 63.2kPa @ 8.3l/s
Notes:
Note 1: Maximum load pressure losses are as summated in Tables 2, 3 and 4. Maximum load flow rates
for DPCV and PICV systems include a 5% allowance for system by-passes to prevent pumps operating
against a closed head.
Note 2: Minimum load pressure losses are those that will be achieved when all control valves are closed
i.e. zero flow through fan coils. For the 4PV system the value is assumed approximately constant. For
the DPCV and PICV systems pump pressure will reduce to that controlled constant at the remote sensor.
Note 3: The pressure loss at 50% load (i.e. 50% flow) has been calculated on the basis that at 50% flow,
the pump pressure will reduce to a value 25% of the difference between the maximum and minimum
differential pressures (since, due to the square law relationship between pressure and flow, a 50%
reduction in flow will result in a 75% reduction in pressure loss).
Prepared by Luca Baroli
Prepared by Luca Baroli
30%
Prepared by Luca Baroli
System controllability: 4PV
Control of the return temperature to the heating
or cooling source is poor. Under part load
conditions, a 4PV will divert flow through its
internal by-pass causing low delta T syndrome.
Prepared by Luca Baroli
System controllability: DPCV
The consequence of poorly located DPCVs is
that 2PVs will not operate with sufficient
authority for effective modulating control of
heating or cooling output. This will result in
uneven temperatures within the building and
may also contribute to low delta T syndrome.
Prepared by Luca Baroli
System controllability: PICV
In a PICV system, each branch has its own differential pressure
regulator that is integral to the PICV. This means that even though
the differential pressures across terminal branches may vary, flow
control conditions are maintained approximately constant by the
action of the PICV. Because the control valve only closes against the
differential pressure maintained constant by the differential pressure
regulator, the control valve authority is maintained at a high level
regardless of variations in differential pressure across the terminal
branch. This means that modulating control of terminal device flow
rates should remain effective under all operating conditions, and the
risk of low delta T syndrome should be avoided.
Prepared by Luca Baroli
Conclusions
The findings of this report show that there are
clear and demonstrable pump energy savings
achievable by the design of variable flow DPCV
or PICV systems compared to constant flow 4PV
systems.
The largest savings are achievable by PICV
systems which can save 70% of pump energy
relative to a constant flow system, and 30%
relative to a DPCV system.
Prepared by Luca Baroli
Further readings
Prepared by Luca Baroli
Prepared by Luca Baroli
Prepared by Luca Baroli
The Definitive Guide to Pressure
Independent Control Valves
By Marflow Hydronics & Parsloe
Consulting Ltd
Prepared by Luca Baroli
Prepared by Luca Baroli
Contact
Luca Baroli Pettinaroli SpA
[email protected]
Local dealer
Dutco Tennant LLC
[email protected] Prepared by Luca Baroli
Thank You!
Prepared by Luca Baroli
