D.

SWETHA
211416631140

CORRELATION USING EXCEL

EX NO:
DATE:

To determine the coefficient of correlation using Excel.

INPUT DATA:
EXPERIE PERFORMA
NCE NCE
16 23
12 22
18 24
4 17
3 19
10 20
5 18
12 21

OUTPUT:
EXPERIE PERFORMA
NCE NCE
EXPERIENC
E 1
PERFORMA 0.951017
NCE 482 1
D.SWETHA
211416631140

CORRELATION USING SPSS

EX NO:
DATE:

To determine the Karl Pearsons coefficient of correlation using SPSS.

INPUT DATA:

VARIABLE VIEW:

DATA VIEW:
D.SWETHA
211416631140

OUTPUT:

Correlations

X Y

X Pearson Correlation 1 .040

Sig. (2-tailed) .912

N 10 10

Y Pearson Correlation .040 1

Sig. (2-tailed) .912

N 10 10
D.SWETHA
211416631140

REGRESSION USING EXCEL

EX NO:
DATE:

To determine the coefficient of regression using Excel.

INPUT DATA:

X Y
45 25
48 30
50 35
55 30
65 40
70 50
75 45
72 55
80 60
85 65

OUTPUT:

SUMMARY OUTPUT

Regression
Statistics
0.94977
Multiple R 999
0.90208
R Square 204
Adjusted R 0.88984
Square 229
Standard 4.56488
Error 403
Observations 10

ANOVA
Significa
df SS MS F nce F
Regression 1 1535.794 1535.7 73.701 2.6186E-
D.SWETHA
211416631140

67 95 05 05
166.7053 20.838
Residual 8 3 17
Total 9 1702.5

Standard Lower Upper Lower

Coefficients Error t Stat P-value 95% 95% 95.0%
- - -
Intercep 7.0687135 2.2501 0.0545 32.20603 0.39493 32.20603
t -15.905551 67 3 56 37 18 4
0.1072828 8.5849 2.62E- 0.673621 1.16841 0.673621
X 0.92101629 95 31 05 494 11 49

RESIDUALOUT
PUT

Predicte
Observation dY Residuals
25.54018
1 23 -0.54018227
28.30323
2 12 1.696768848
30.14526
3 37 4.854736261
34.75034 -
4 52 4.750345209
43.96050 -
5 81 3.960508147
48.56558
6 96 1.434410384
53.17067 -
7 11 8.170671085
50.40762
8 22 4.592377796
57.77575
9 26 2.224247445
62.38083
10 4 2.619165976
D.SWETHA
211416631140

CONCLUSION:

REGRESSION USING SPSS

EX NO:
DATE:

To determine the coefficient of regression using SPSS.

INPUT DATA:

VARIABLE DATA:

DATA VIEW:
D.SWETHA
211416631140

OUTPUT:

Variables Entered/Removedb

Variables Variables
Model Entered Removed Method

1 Xa . Enter

a. All requested variables entered.

b. Dependent Variable: Y

Model Summary

Change Statistics

Adjusted R Std. Error of the R Square

Model R R Square Square Estimate Change F Change df1 df2 Sig. F Chan

1 .373a .139 -.148 16.940 .139 .485 1 3 .

a. Predictors: (Constant), X

ANOVAb

Model Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig.

1 Regression 139.130 1 139.130 .485 .536a

Residual 860.870 3 286.957

Total 1000.000 4

a. Predictors: (Constant), X
D.SWETHA
211416631140

ANOVAb

Model Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig.

1 Regression 139.130 1 139.130 .485 .536a

Residual 860.870 3 286.957

Total 1000.000 4

b. Dependent Variable: Y

Coefficientsa

Standardized
Unstandardized Coefficients Coefficients

Model B Std. Error Beta t Sig.

1 (Constant) 89.565 16.792 5.334 .013

X .348 .500 .373 .696 .536

a. Dependent Variable: Y

CONCLUSION:

CHI-SQUARE USING SPSS

EX NO:
DATE:

To test if education depends on gender using chi-square using spss.

INPUT DATA:
D.SWETHA
211416631140

H 0 : Education is independent of gender.

VARIABLE VIEW:

DATA VIEW:

OUTPUT:

Case Processing Summary

Cases

Valid Missing Total

N Percent N Percent N Percent

SEX * EDUCATION 100 100.0% 0 .0% 100 100.0%

D.SWETHA
211416631140

SEX * EDUCATION Crosstabulation

EDUCATION Total

MIDDLE
SCHOOL HIGH SCHOOL COLLEGE

SEX MALE Count 10 15 25 50

Expected Count 17.5 12.5 20.0 50.0

FEMALE Count 25 10 15 50

Expected Count 17.5 12.5 20.0 50.0

Total Count 35 25 40 100

Expected Count 35.0 25.0 40.0 100.0

Chi-Square Tests

Asymp. Sig. (2-

Value df sided)

Pearson Chi-Square 9.929a 2 .007

Likelihood Ratio 10.175 2 .006

Linear-by-Linear Association 8.278 1 .004

N of Valid Cases 100

a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum

expected count is 12.50.

CONCLUSION:
The value of p(0.007)<0.05, thus reject the null hypothesis. Education is dependent of
gender.
D.SWETHA
211416631140

CHI-SQUARE USING SPSS

EX NO:
DATE:

To test the null hypothesis at a significance value 0.10 using chi-square using spss.

INPUT DATA:
H 0 : Economy is independent of sales.

H 1 : Economy is dependent on sales.

VARIABLE VIEW:

DATA VIEW:
D.SWETHA
211416631140

OUTPUT:

Case Processing Summary

Cases

Valid Missing Total

N Percent N Percent N Percent

ECONOMY * SALES 200 100.0% 0 .0% 200 100.0%

ECONOMY * SALES Crosstabulation

SALES Total

HIGH MEDIUM LOW

ECONOMY PEAK Count 20 7 3 30

Expected Count 15.0 9.0 6.0 30.0

TROUGH Count 30 40 30 100

Expected Count 50.0 30.0 20.0 100.0

RAISING Count 20 8 2 30

Expected Count 15.0 9.0 6.0 30.0

FALLING Count 30 5 5 40

Expected Count 20.0 12.0 8.0 40.0

Total Count 100 60 40 200

Expected Count 100.0 60.0 40.0 200.0

D.SWETHA
211416631140

Chi-Square Tests

Asymp. Sig. (2-

Value df sided)

Pearson Chi-Square 34.597a 6 .000

Likelihood Ratio 36.624 6 .000

Linear-by-Linear Association 6.325 1 .012

N of Valid Cases 200

a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum

expected count is 6.00.

CONCLUSION:
D.SWETHA
211416631140

The value of p(0.000)<0.05. Thus reject the null hypothesis. Economy is dependent on sales.

FORECASTING
EX NO:
DATE:

To estimate sales when the purchases equal 100.

INPUT DATA:

PURCHASE SALE
S S
62 112
72 124
98 131
76 117
81 132
56 96
76 120
92 136
88 97
49 85

OUTPUT:

EQUATI FORECA
100 ON ST TREND
134.56 134.56
134.566 473 47

y = 0.7826x + 56.306
R = 0.51
D.SWETHA
211416631140

FORECASTING
EX NO:
DATE:

To test the forecast using Excel.

1) Obtain the regression equation of sales on score.
2) If a salesman has a score of 65, what is the sale?
3) If a salesman has sales of 75, what is the sale?

INPUT DATA:

TEST WEEKLY
SCORE SALES
50 30
60 60
50 40
60 50
80 60
50 30
80 70
40 50
70 60

OUTPUT:
FORECA TREN
EQUATION ST D
53.7
65 53.75 53.75 5
y = 0.75x + 5
R = 0.5625

FORECA TREN
EQUATION ST D
75 78.75 78.75 78.7
D.SWETHA
211416631140

5
y = 0.75x + 22.5
R = 0.5625

MANN-WHITNEY USING SPSS

EX NO:
DATE:

To determine if there is a significant difference in the sales of the two branches.

INPUT DATA:
H 0 : There is no significant difference in the sales of two branches.

H 1 : There is a significant difference in the sales of two branches.

VARIABLE VIEW:
D.SWETHA
211416631140

DATA VIEW:
D.SWETHA
211416631140

OUTPUT:

Descriptive Statistics

N Mean Std. Deviation Minimum Maximum

COUNT 24 285.58 40.687 200 350

BRANCH 24 1.50 .511 1 2

D.SWETHA
211416631140

Ranks

BRANCH N Mean Rank Sum of Ranks

COUNT BRANCH A 12 12.38 148.50

BRANCH B 12 12.62 151.50

Total 24

Test Statisticsb

COUNT

Mann-Whitney U 70.500

Wilcoxon W 148.500

Z -.087

Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed) .931

Exact Sig. [2*(1-tailed Sig.)] .932a

a. Not corrected for ties.

b. Grouping Variable: BRANCH

CONCLUSION:
Thus the value of p(0.931) >0.05, we accept null hypothesis. There is no significant
difference in the sales of two branch.