Evolutionary Theories
Evolutionary theories are based on the assumption that societies gradually
change from simple beginnings into even more complex forms. Early
sociologists beginning with Auguste Comte believed that human societies
evolve in a unilinear way- that is in one line of development. According to
them social change meant progress toward something better.
They saw change as positive and beneficial. To them the evolutionary
process implied that societies would necessarily reach new and higher levels
of civilization.L.H Morgan believed that there were three basic stages in the
process: savagery, barbarism and civilization.Auguste Comte's ideas relating
to the three stages in the development of human thought and also of society
namely-the theological, the metaphysical and the positive in a way represent
the three basic stages of social change. This evolutionary view of social
change was highly influenced by Charles Darwin's theory of Organic
Evolution.
Those who were fascinated by this theory applied it to the human society
and argued that societies must have evolved from the simple and primitive
to that of too complex and advanced such as the western society. Herbert
Spencer a British sociologist carried this analogy to its extremity. He argued
that society itself is an organism. He even applied Darwin's principle of the
survival of the fittest to human societies. He said that society has been
gradually progressing towards a better state. He argued that it has evolved
from military society to the industrial society. He claimed that western races,
classes or societies had survived and evolved because they were better
adapted to face the conditions of life. This view known as social Darwinism
got widespread popularity in the late 19th century. It survived even during
the first phase of the 20th century. Emile Durkheim identified the cause of
societal evolution as a society's increasing moral density.Durkheim viewed
societies as changing in the direction of greater differentiation,
interdependence and formal control under the pressure of increasing moral
density. He advocated that societies have evolved from a relatively
undifferentiated social structure with minimum of division of labor and with a
kind of solidarity called mechanical solidarity to a more differentiated social
structure with maximum division of labor giving rise to a kind of solidarity
called organic solidarity.
Functionalist or Dynamic theories:
In the middle decades of the 20th century a number of American sociologists
shifted their attention from social dynamics to social static or from social
change to social stability.Talcott Parsons stressed the importance of cultural
patterns in controlling the stability of a society. According to him society has
the ability to absorb disruptive forces while maintaining overall stability.
Change is not as something that disturbs the social equilibrium but as
something that alters the state of equilibrium so that a qualitatively new
equilibrium results. He has stated that changes may arise from two sources.
They may come from outside the society through contact with other
societies. They may also come from inside the society through adjustment
that must be made to resolve strains within the system. Parsons speaks of
two processes that are at work in social change. In simple societies
institutions are undifferentiated that is a single institution serves many
functions. The family performs reproductive, educational, socializing,
economic, recreational and other functions. A process of differentiation takes
place when the society becomes more and more complex. Different
institutions such as school, factory may take over some of the functions of a
family. The new institutions must be linked together in a proper way by the
process of integration. New norms must be established in order to govern
the relationship between the school and the home. Further bridging
institutions such as law courts must resolve conflicts between other
components in the system.