This document provides a short history of various Unix-like operating systems such as BSD, Linux, FreeBSD, NetBSD and OpenBSD. It summarizes their key features and differences in licensing. It also describes the development process, funding, and community behind FreeBSD.
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0 ratings0% found this document useful (0 votes)
52 views
Short History
This document provides a short history of various Unix-like operating systems such as BSD, Linux, FreeBSD, NetBSD and OpenBSD. It summarizes their key features and differences in licensing. It also describes the development process, funding, and community behind FreeBSD.
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 21
Short history
Based on: http://www.levenez.com/unix/
1978 BSD (Barkeley software distribution) Based on unix system developed by Bell. 1991 386BSD BSD port to Intel (Based on 4.3BSD). 1991 Linux based on Minix. 1993 FreeBSD and NetBSD Based on 386BSD. 1995 - OpenBSD splits from NetBSD. 2001 Apples Darwin, based on FreeBSD. Latest releases: 5.3, 4.11. The most popular of the *BSDs. Historically aimed for maximum. performance on X86. Now supports most of the popular hardware platforms. Biggest installations: Yahoo servers, ftp.cdrom.com, www.netcraft.com. Of course it runs NetBSD Last version: NetBSD 2.0. Aims for supporting as many architectures possible. Portable design. 40 supported architectures. www.openbsd.org Current version: OpenBSD 3.6. Try to be the #1 most secure operating system. Secure by default. Based on Canada is not restricted by US export laws. developer.apple.com/darwin/projects/darwin/ The operating system behind Apples MAC OS X. Based on FreeBSD. Apples cool GUI, on top of a reliable Open source unix. Runs on PowerPC based Macintosh. Version for X86 is also available. Licensing Issues Linux GPL Must publish your source code if your code is based on a GPLd software. *BSD - BSD license. Do what ever you want, just give us credit. Poul Henning Kamp - Beerware license Do what ever you want, just buy me beer when we meet. FreeBSD The people behind FreeBSD Core Team The board of directors. FreeBSD Committers The programmers. Release Engineering Teams Documentation engineering team Port management team. Donations Team. FreeBSD The people behind cont Technical Review Board. Security officer. Security Team. Bugmeisters and GNATS admins. Core team secretary. Funding Donations raised by the FreeBSD foundation (can be of money or hardware). Very well organized site with donation want list, and list of received donations. Dontations raised by individuals. Selling CDs and merchandise. FreeBSD Base System Linux is a kernel. FreeBSD is a whole system (much like a linux distribution). The base system is developed under one administrative control. All needed applications are integrated into FreeBSD. FreeBSD Ports Collection of utility and application software that has been ported to FreeBSD. All ports are found in one central CVS. Upgrade downgrade mechanism (much like apt-get and rpm). Today - 12326 ports. Release Engineering Current version up to date code. Real hackers run current on their laptop. Stable version stable code. Release version code of a formal release based on the stable at that time. Very organized release process. Getting FreeBSD http://www.freebsd.org/where.html Purchase a 4 CD set. Download ISO files. Download sources via CVS and compiling. Installing using install floppies and a network connection. FreeBSD CVS cvsup keeping up to date with a chosen branch. anoncvs getting small pieces of code on demand. CTM getting patches by mail. Web interface looking at a certain file, and checking diffs between versions. Reporting Bugs Very organized problem report (pr) submission mechanism. Web searchable list of all reported problem reports. Bugmeisters responsible for perliminery classification of the bugs, and handing them over to the developers. Trying to put the bug fixing in top priority. FreeBSD documentation http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859- 1/books/faq/index.html http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859- 1/books/handbook/ http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859- 1/books/developers-handbook/ http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859- 1/books/handbook/eresources.html#ERESOURCE S-MAIL www.google.com/bsd Kame Project http://www.kame.net/ Joint effort of 6 Japanies companies. Aims to provide IPv6 and IPsec (for IPv4 and IPv6) for all BSD variants. Provides much more than it aimed for. Integrated into the formal releases. One floppy version of FreeBSD. Based on old 3.0 version. Need at least 386SX with 8M RAM. 4 available versions Dialup, Router, Networking and Dial-in server. A custom version of FreeBSD on a floppy can also be built. Linux compatibility mode Full binary compatibility for linux as long as the application doesnt overly use i386 specific calls. Linux_base port contains Linux libraries. /compat/linux dir contains Linux config files. http://www.linuxinfor.com/english/FreeBSD/linux emu-advanced.html No performance degradation. Whos Better? Testing Performance Results of MySQL test I found on http://software.newsforge.com/article.pl?sid=04/1 2/27/1243207&from=rss With small files that can be cached easily, on one CPU, NetBSD seemed best, before Linux, and way before the others. When switching to 2 CPUs Linux took the lead. On bigger files, Linux was best, before FreeBSD. NetBSD was way behind. Testing performance (cont) http://bulk.fefe.de/scalability/ Tests system calls like socket, bind, fork, connect and mmap. Tests also HTTP request latency. Does not test network traffic load. Conclusions are that Linux 2.6 is best, FreeBSD 5.1 and Linux 2.4 (except for mmap and fork) do very good. Others fall behind.