Scribd
Upload
30 views3 pages

Assignment3 Id 018

1) An ANOVA test was conducted to analyze the differences in educational levels and previous work experiences among clerical employees, custodial employees, and managers. 2) For both educational levels and previous work experiences, the significance values were 0, so the null hypothesis that the means are equal was rejected. 3) Multiple comparison tests found that custodial employees had significantly more years of education and more previous work experience than both clerical employees and managers.

Uploaded by

Rubayet
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
30 views3 pages

Assignment3 Id 018

1) An ANOVA test was conducted to analyze the differences in educational levels and previous work experiences among clerical employees, custodial employees, and managers. 2) For both educational levels and previous work experiences, the significance values were 0, so the null hypothesis that the means are equal was rejected. 3) Multiple comparison tests found that custodial employees had significantly more years of education and more previous work experience than both clerical employees and managers.

Uploaded by

Rubayet
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 3

ASSIGNMENT 3

SUBMITTED BY:
Rubayet Khair Rushdi (ZR 1703018)
ANOVA

Educational Level (years)

Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig.

Between Groups 1622.989 2 811.495 165.212 .000

Within Groups 2313.477 471 4.912

Total 3936.466 473

Multiple Comparisons

Educational Level (years)


LSD

(I) (J) 95% Confidence Interval


Employment Employment Mean Difference
Category Category (I-J) Std. Error Sig. Lower Bound Upper Bound

Clerical Custodial 2.683* .442 .000 1.81 3.55

Manager -4.382* .268 .000 -4.91 -3.85

Custodial Clerical -2.683* .442 .000 -3.55 -1.81

Manager -7.065* .490 .000 -8.03 -6.10

Manager Clerical 4.382* .268 .000 3.85 4.91

Custodial 7.065* .490 .000 6.10 8.03

*. The mean difference is significant at the 0.05 level.

Let µ1 = mean education level of the total population of clerical employees.


Let µ2 = mean education level of the total population of custodial employees.
Let µ3 = mean education level of the total population of managers.

H0: µ1 = µ2 = µ3

HA: At least one of the means is different.

For α = 1%,
We reject the null hypothesis because the significance level (p-value) tends to zero.

There isn’t any similarity of the education level among clerical employees, custodial
employees and managers.
ANOVA

Previous Experience (months)

Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig.

Between Groups 1174906.874 2 587453.437 69.192 .000

Within Groups 3998899.936 471 8490.233

Total 5173806.810 473

Multiple Comparisons

Previous Experience (months)


LSD

(I) (J) 95% Confidence Interval


Employment Employment Mean Difference
Category Category (I-J) Std. Error Sig. Lower Bound Upper Bound

Clerical Custodial -213.073* 18.380 .000 -249.19 -176.95

Manager 7.420 11.156 .506 -14.50 29.34

Custodial Clerical 213.073* 18.380 .000 176.95 249.19

Manager 220.492* 20.384 .000 180.44 260.55

Manager Clerical -7.420 11.156 .506 -29.34 14.50

Custodial -220.492* 20.384 .000 -260.55 -180.44

*. The mean difference is significant at the 0.05 level.

Let µ1 = mean previous work experiences of the total population of clerical employees.
Let µ2 = mean previous work experiences of the total population of custodial employees.
Let µ3 = mean previous work experiences of the total population of managers.

H0: µ1 = µ2 = µ3
HA: At least one of the means is different.
For α = 1%,
We reject the null hypothesis because the significance level (p-value) tends to zero.
Custodial employees have more previous work experiences than both the clerical
employees and managers.

You might also like