FIN3103 Exam
FIN3103 Exam
of the
Banks in the economy, especially, the central banks role, the debt and equity markets. Think about
what should central banks do in a country where the economy is stagnating, price level stagnating
(review what Japan is doing for example) and compare/contrast with a central bank in an economy
where the price levels are rising, debts increasing, and the banks are full of nonperforming assets.
What should or can central banks do?
Review central banks / bank regulations and bank risk management
Fiscal policy – Government use (1) Tax rates and (2) Government spending to control inflation
For example, stimulating a stagnant economy by increasing spending or lowering taxes runs the risk
of causing inflation to rise.
This is because an increase in the amount of money in the economy, followed by an increase in
consumer demand, can result in a decrease in the value of money - meaning that it would take more
money to buy something that has not changed in value.
Let's say that an economy has slowed down. Unemployment levels are up, consumer spending is
down and businesses are not making substantial profits. A government thus decides to fuel the
economy's engine by decreasing taxation, which gives consumers more spending money, while
increasing government spending in the form of buying services from the market (such as building
roads or schools). By paying for such services, the government creates jobs and wages that are in
turn pumped into the economy. Pumping money into the economy by decreasing taxation and
increasing government spending is also known as "pump priming." In the meantime, overall
unemployment levels will fall.
With more money in the economy and fewer taxes to pay, consumer demand for goods and services
increases. This, in turn, rekindles businesses and turns the cycle around from stagnant to active.
If, however, there are no reins on this process, the increase in economic productivity can cross over a
very fine line and lead to too much money in the market. This excess in supply decreases the value of
money while pushing up prices (because of the increase in demand for consumer products). Hence,
inflation exceeds the reasonable level.
For this reason, fine tuning the economy through fiscal policy alone can be a difficult, if not
improbable, means to reach economic goals. If not closely monitored, the line between a productive
economy and one that is infected by inflation can be easily blurred.
Monetary Policy
In UK and US, monetary policy is the most important tool for maintaining low inflation.
Government sets a low positive interest rate and the Monetary Policy Committee (MPC) of England
uses interest rates to try and achieve this target.
MPC predicts future inflation by looking at economic statistics.
Increased interest rates reduce the growth of aggregate demand of the country
Slower growth leads to lower inflation.
High interest rates reduce consumer spending
Increase the cost of borrowing, discouraging borrowing and spending
Makes it more attractive to save
Reduce the disposable income of those with loans and mortgages
Higher interest rates increase the value of the exchange rate and leads to lower exports and more
imports
Cost-push inflation
Inflation believed to be temporary
Rising oil prices, rising tax rates, impact of devaluation
Economy in recession, reducing aggregate demand by increasing interest rates can worsen
recession
If the FOMC raises its target for the federal funds rates
Sell government securities, collecting payments from the banks selling them
Withdraw money from the banks’ reserve accounts
Smaller money supply
Increase the federal funds rates and the interest rates
Discourage spending encourage saving
Discount Rate
Discount rate set by Federal Reserve
The rate at which banks borrow from the central bank
If the bank wants to stimulate economy, lower interest rates by offering commercial banks lower
rates
Reserve Requirements
All depository institutions must set a % of their deposits as reserves to be held as cash
Altering reserve requirements is a monetary policy that is rarely used
Supports monetary policy by creating a relatively predictable demand for loans in the federal funds
market
Banks sometimes borrow in the market just to meet reserve requirements
Bank regulations
Uniform Financial Institutions Rating System (UFIRS) assigns a composite rating
CAMELS based on SIX essential components
(1) Capital adequacy
(2) Asset Quality
(3) Management
(4) Earnings
(5) Liquidity
(6) Sensitivity to market risk
Rating from 1-5
1. Best – Institution sound in all aspects
2. Fundamentally sound, but modest weakness which can be easily corrected during normal business
3. Financial, operational or compliance weaknesses are present
4. Immoderate volume of financial weakness
5. Immediate or near term failure is likely
Basel III
Increase in minimum capital requirements at individual banks
Improvement of quality of capital and risk coverage at individual banks
Internationally harmonised leverage ratios at all individual banks
Improvements to supervisory processes at national level
Counter cyclical buffers of increasing buffers in good times
7) Liquidity risk – whenever a FI’s liability holders demand immediate cash for financial claims or
when there is an unexpected demand in new loans. FIs must be able to meet borrower’s demands.
When their supply is restricted or unavailable,
Banks have to liquidate less liquid items at a loss to finance their lending
Solvency problem and cause a bank run
Effective liquidity risk management ensures a bank’s ability to meet cash flow obligations, which are
uncertain as they are affected by external events and agent’s behaviour.
(1) Price levels rising (2) Debts rising (3) Banks full of non-performing assets
Looking at recent events: How would you rate, ECB, the Federal Reserve, Bank of
England and the Bank of Japan. Which Central bank, in your opinion is doing its best?
And why? Consider the three key roles of central banks: (1) dealing with monetary
policy, (2) financial system stability and (3) currency management.
1) Bank of England
In terms of which central banks are doing best, I would rank it in this order (Best first)
BOE, the Fed, European Central Bank (ECB) and then BOJ.
Bank of England - why I think it's doing well is because its fiscal stimuluses work. Given that Brexit was a fairly
significant event, we can see that the BOE reacted quickly to this negative event in two ways:
1. In terms of monetary policy - it made the decision to cut its benchmark interest rate, an accommodative move
that was meant to combat an expected decline in the UK economy from this event.
2. It provided immediate fiscal stimulus with bond buybacks. Buy back securities, inject commercial banks
with money, downward pressure on interest rates, increase consumer spending.
The results? The UK economy has been recovering well post Brexit and GDP growth has been
sustained at 0.7% QoQ, while consumer prices have been expanding rapidly.
In terms of currency management, it is difficult for the BoE to control the sterling given that many factors are at
large - from market sentiment to algorithmic trading machines (last year's flash crash comes to mind). However,
they have been taking fiscal measures to boost the UK economy at large, such as its bond buying programme.
Given that rates are also very accommodative at 0.25%, Britain is definitely poised for growth as its
currency makes it attractive for foreign investors to come in at this period of time. This could in
turn offset the ~20% GBP devaluation that happened last year post-Brexit.
This was aptly controlled by the BOE where they launched a 170b pound stimulus package, coupled with
interest cuts, encouraging consumer and institutional expenditures. The decrease in interest cuts encouraged
companies to increase investments, allowing Britons to remain upbeat about their career prospects. Though
inflation has been inching higher - to 1.8% in January, unemployment has continued to fall, to
stand at an 11 year low of 4.8%. (BBCNews, 2017) Therefore, boosting consumer spirits whilst keeping
consumer confidence level stable, and higher than 12 months previously. (The Telegraph, 2017)
2) USA – Federal Reserve System (FED)
In my opinion Feds is performing the best. As many of my classmates has correctly pointed out, US has been
recovering from the 2008 global financial crisis and was able to maintain moderate growth along
with low inflation rates. I will like to move on to explain why US was able to outperform ECB and BOJ even
though all 3 countries used quantitative easing as means to stimulate the economy. Quantitative Easing is
the buying of government securities in order to lower interest rates and increase money supply. QE
is adopted when short term interest rates are at or approaching zero and thus the central banks
tries to affect long term interest rates in order to flatten the yield curve. I believe the main reason why
QE worked for the US is because they managed to implement their fiscal policy in tandem with their
monetary policy. When Japan and Europe increased the money supply in the economy, interest rates
decreased. However, that did not help to stimulate the economy. This was because the money remained in
the bank reserves as banks were conservative with their lending and demand for credit was low
due to the negative economic conditions. Without increased lending and investing, economic
activity continued to remain low and therefore they failed to experience any growth. What the US did
differently was that they made use of their fiscal policy to move the money supply from the bank reserves, into
the economy. The government went on to borrow money from the banks and increased their government
expenditure. This expansionary fiscal policy helped increase growth rates and reduce unemployment in the US.
I think the BoJ faces an uphill challenge in boosting the Japanese economy - it has tried to initiate many forms of
stimulus - monetary/fiscal with negative rates and lots of helicopter money; but the slump continues despite this
because of the structural problems that its economy faces.
I agree with the points posted by the others and the general consensus of the ranking of BOE, Fed, ECB and
BOJ. As many have already expounded on the successes of BOE and failures of BOJ, in this post, I would like to
talk about how ECB has failed.
3) European Central Bank
As mentioned, ECB has been rather slow and inflexible in terms of managing crisis. However, as we try to
ascertain why this is so, we first take a look at what ECB defines their primary objective to be:
“The primary objective of the ECB’s monetary policy is to maintain price stability. The ECB aims at inflation rates
of below, but close to, 2% over the medium term.”
This can be contrasted with other central bank’s goals, for example, BOE’s:
“The Bank’s monetary policy objective is to deliver price stability – low inflation – and, subject to that, to support
the Government’s economic objectives including those for growth and employment.”
From this, we can see that ECB has placed a lot of focus on simply maintaining low inflation rates,
without much emphasis on other aspects of the economy such as growth and employment. This has
result in certain odd policy decisions, for example, increasing interest rates in 2011 even though the
European economy was entering a double dip recession, just to keep inflation low. While this has
indeed helped them keep their inflation close to their target of 2%, it did nothing to help with the falling
growth rates. If the ECB had been willing to tolerate slight cost-push inflation in the short run, they may have
been able to mitigate the fall in growth and reduced unemployment.
Another point would be their inertia in dealing with crisis. In the European Debt crisis, the ECB waited 2 years
before deciding to undergo whatever measures necessary to save the Euro. This led to unnecessary interest rate
burden for governments and Eurozone economies facing pressure to instigate harsh austerity measures that
reduced demand and economic growth. Hence, while ECB’s policies can in fact be effective (as compared to
BOJ’s), the problem lies with poor policy decision in inertia in implementing policies.
4) Bank of Japan
I agree with most of my classmates' ranking of the central banks - BoE first, followed by the Fed, ECB, and lastly
BoJ. With a general consensus of the inability of BoJ to deliver results being the main reason why BoJ is
consistently ranked last by many of us, I would like to provide for a discussion on why BoJ is not getting
anywhere with its monetary policies, and give BoJ credit where its due.
Japan has been battling deflation for 20 years, and even with Prime Minister Shinzo Abe and Central Bank
Governor Haruhiko Kuroda pledging to do "whatever it takes", Japan's economy is still lagging. BoJ is limited in
what policies it can implement and how effective it can be. Expansionary monetary policies worked for a while
but as deflation sets back in again, this shows that the effect of this monetary policy has faded. I believe that the
core issue lies with Japan's ageing population. According to an article by the World Economic Forum, "By 2020
the country will be losing around 600,000 people a year. Getting growth from an ageing, shrinking society is
difficult." The last line speaks for itself.
Another substantial issue that Japan faces, and is out of BoJ's control, would be Japan's enormous national debt,
where Japan’s gross government debt is 226% of GDP. However, without fiscal stimulus from the government to
go hand-in-hand with BoJ's expansionary monetary stimulus to keep the battle against deflation going, BoJ's
effectiveness is once again limited.
Nonetheless, in spite of these issues that are out of BoJ's control, BoJ must continue to fulfill its responsibility as
a central bank in ensuring the stability of prices and the financial system in a whole. BoJ's unwavering stance in
keeping monetary policies aggressive, leaving low interest rates unchanged might be ineffective in keeping
deflation in check and perhaps, BoJ could switch it up and surprise the market in a move to raise interest rates.
Let’s think about the exam now: March 18, we will cover everything covered so far, so for example be
prepared to do mortgage valuation and calculate the impact of interest rate changes on the mortgage
value (price), bond value (price), and understand the interest rate change implications (interest rate
risk) on the balance sheet of the banks. Think about the questions: How can banks manage the
interest rate risk, what rates are banks’ lending in Europe, US, Singapore. For example in Singapore
with the exception of HDB loans, most loans are adjustable rate mortgages (ARMs) or hybrid-ARMS,
so the banks try to pass on the exchange rate risk. But they price their mortgages based on SIBOR,
SOR, Deposit mortgage rate (or so called Fixed Deposit Home Rate at DBS), or Board rates. Why are
there so many different rates, which are relevant, how can banks, versus borrowers hedge their
risk...?
Real interest rate is the interest rate that would exist if there were no inflation.
T-Bills
Debt obligation with maturity of less than one year
When the yield curve changes shape, the outlook of the economy changes.
Upward sloping = long term yields are higher than short term yields.
Hybrid ARMs
Fixed for the initial period.
After initial period the rate is adjustable.
How Banks and Borrowers can Hedge their Interest Rate Risks
1) Forwards – determinant of gain/loss is an interest rate. One party pays a fixed interest rate and
receives a floating interest rate equal to a reference date.
2) Futures – provides the counterparties with less risk than a forward contract, namely a lessening of
default and liquidity risk due to the inclusion of an intermediary.
3) Swap – Interest rate swap involves an agreement between counterparties to exchange sets of
future cash flows. One party pays a fixed interest rate and receives a floating rate, with the other
party paying a floating rate and receiving a fixed rate.
4) Options – option contract where the underlying asset is a debt obligation. Protects parties involved
in a floating rate loan, such as ARMs.
Cap = call option on an interest rate. Borrower uses this to protect against rising interest rates. If
the actual interest rate exceeds the strike rate.
Floor = put. A lender uses this to protect against falling rates on a loan.
SIBOR is generally determined by the demand and supply of funds in the Singapore interbank
market.
SIBOR tends to be more stable than the SOR
SOR is determined by external factors such as the USD interest and exchange rates.
SOR tends to fluctuate more.
Consumers who take up SOR packages are consumers with
HIGHER RISK profiles and wish to take advantage of the SOR’s ability to drop to levels way below the
SIBOR
And can confidently tide over the period where the SOR is way above the SIBOR
While they are affected by different factors, they trend in the same general direction.
Let’s think about the exam now: March 18, we will cover everything covered so far, debt markets
instruments. Firms can secure new funds through various channels and various assets. The market
liquidity and the risk sharing are important consideration for investors in deciding whether to invest
with a specific firm or project or not. Bond investors are keenly aware of the low market liquidity and
this liquidity risk is priced in the bonds in most cases. While corporations normally carry high credit risk
(or higher than the government in their home country) there are sometimes cases when investors
(perhaps behave swayed by sentiment) and invest in companies (for example Apple) and demanding
very low returns, much lower than the returns on government bonds. So companies may be able to
exploit market sentiment and raise funds cheaply either in the debt market or in the Equity market.
What do you think about the recent IPO of SnapInc. Do you think that there is perhaps a tech bubble
in the equity market?
Bond investors must be aware of the low market liquidity and liquidity risk is priced in bonds in most
cases.
Cases where companies like Apple have raised debt with very low returns, less than government bonds,
which is evidence that they can exploit market sentiment and raise funds cheaply.
Governance:
SnapIncs shares being sold to public are Class A shares which have NO voting rights
Investors will have no say in the company
Founders retain 89% of the voting rights
Could turn institutional investors away
Network:
Although userbase has been growing rapidly in past few years
Growth of users may not significantly add revenue to Snap
Lack of Profit:
Snap cannot justify their high valuation with growth.
Though revenue has been increasing rapidly, the growth in users has slowed.
Expenses are also increasing rapidly, and could outpace revenue growth for a long time.
Rising Competition:
Whatsapp, Instagram, Facebook pulling out their own “My Story” functions on their applications. Pose
a rising threat to the exclusivity of Snap.
Exploiting positive market sentiment – IPO market was recently very dry and investors are looking
for something new
Lock-up period:
Snap recently amended their filing, requesting for a 1 year lock up period instead of the 150 day period
initially asked for, which may indicate a lack of confidence for the stock price once the lock up period
ends. The lock up periods are intended to guard the company shares against a short selling onslaught
that can destroy its valuation if investors predict that share prices will drop. Selling by insiders are
viewed by the investing public as a lack of faith in the company’s prospects
To draw a parallel, the first day after Facebook’s lock-up period, Facebook shares dropped by 50%
from its listing price. This is further evidence of a tech bubble.
Tech Bubble:
Eight of the 10 biggest technology IPOs fell by between 25% and 71% in their first 12 months on the
public market, according to a Reuters analysis of market performance. On Feb 13, Snap announced
changes to its lock-up expiration rule to allow employees to sell shares after 150 days (versus 180
days, which was initially listed in its IPO Prospectus). Employees holding standard stock awards are
now able to sell shares after 150 days, the same holding period as co-founders and investors. There
will be two enormous lockup expirations for Snapchat in the coming months, which may offer better
buying opportunities as insider and employee sales hit the tape.
Twitter currently trades at half its value since IPO. The issue for Twitter was monetization, active user
growth and user engagement. Snapchat will likely face these same problems, as its 18-24 user base
matures with time. The likelihood of sustained value creation is low.
Recent Performance:
Since opening at $24.48 on March 2, the share price is currently 19.22 as of yesterday.
3) Review the various financial assets and instruments we learnt about (short term debt assets: short
term loans, commercial papers, long term (or capital market) debt assets, equity....)
You can organize the debt market and the equity market under private and public assets (instead of
maturity):
3A: Private debt assets: informal lending, loans
3B: Private debt assets : bonds, commercial papers, MBS, notes,
3C: Private equity: (equity through private placement, generally used during the start-up phase of the
company)
3D: Public Equity : preferred share, common share..
Typically issued by big companies while small companies get their credit from a bank loan
Bond equivalent yield. Pf is the face value, t is the term length in days.
During US financial crisis in 2008, total CP outstanding dropped by 370B, while asset backed CP
accounted for 267B of this decline.
Asset backed CP, 1/3 of it was backed by US real estate assets, which was particularly vulnerable.
2A) Public Debt – Banker’s acceptance – deposit to a bank, bank borrow money from a person who is
due payment at expiration date (liability for bank)
Call option – gives the issuer (bank) the right to buy back the debt
Put option – gives the buyer the right to sell back the debt
Convertible – gives bondholder right to change the bond to a specified number of shares
For all bonds, a given INCREASE in i/r will cause a SMALLER price change than a decrease in i/r
of the SAME magnitude.
3) Private Equity
Private placement - A private placement is the sale of securities to a relatively small number of select
investors as a way of raising capital. Investors involved in private placements are usually large
banks, mutual funds, insurance companies and pension funds. A private placement is different from a
public issue, in which securities are made available for sale on the open market to any type of
investor.
Leveraged buyouts
A leveraged buyout (LBO) is the acquisition of another company using a significant amount of
borrowed money to meet the cost of acquisition. The assets of the company being acquired are often
used as collateral for the loans, along with the assets of the acquiring company. The purpose of
leveraged buyouts is to allow companies to make large acquisitions without having to commit a lot of
capital.
As the debt usually has a lower cost of capital than the cost of capital, the returns on
equity increasing with increasing debt. The debt acts as a lever to increase returns.
BREAKING DOWN 'Leveraged Buyout - LBO'
In an LBO, there is usually a ratio of 90% debt to 10% equity. Because of this high debt/equity ratio,
the bonds issued in the buyout are usually are not investment grade and are referred to as junk
bonds. Further, many people regard LBOs as an especially ruthless, predatory tactic. This is because
it isn't usually sanctioned by the target company. Further, it's seen as ironic in that a company's
success, in terms of assets on the balance sheet, can be used against it as collateral by a hostile
company.
Reasons for LBOs
LBOs are conducted for three main reasons. The first is to take a public company private; the second
is to spin-off a portion of an existing business by selling it; and the third is to transfer private
property, as is the case with a change in small business ownership. However, it is usually a
requirement that the acquired company or entity, in each scenario, is profitable and growing.
Venture capital
Mezzanine capital
Mezzanine financing is a hybrid of debt and equity financing that gives the lender the rights to
convert to an ownership or equity interest in the company in case of default, after venture
capital companies and other senior lenders are paid.
Distressed investments
3) Public equity
IPO
IPO Firm Commitment (for high quality companies):
Underwriter GUARANTEES the sales
Shares that are not sold are bought by the underwriter
For high quality companies
SEO
Subscription rights – shareholders receive subscription rights. One to one or one to two. For every
share they own, they can subscribe to one new share or two new shares at a preset price
Pre-emptive rights – 10k shares in 500k a share company. 2% ownership. When new shares are
traded, the company has to give the owner a chance to buy new shares to maintain 2% ownership.
Ordinary shares
Ownership right
Residual cash flow
Preferred shares
Hybrid asset, mix of bond and equity
No voting rights
Higher priority to claim than ordinary
Cumulative or non-cumulative
Depository receipts
Broker buys shares in home country and deposits shares in bank, bank issues DRs
Traded in foreign exchanges
Dividends paid in local currencies
Exposed to political and forex risk
Price of ADRs closely tracks stock in home market
Mutual funds
Collective investment vehicle
Open end – issue NEW shares to investors
Closed end – fixed number of shares
Unit Trusts
Passive
Buy and hold
Lower transaction costs
Holds a fixed portfolio
ETFs
Open-ended investment funds which track indices
Provide access to a wide range of asset classes
REITS
Raise capital to purchase real estate assets
Generate income for unit holders of the fund
Allows individual investors to indirectly invest in property and share the benefits and risks
Distribute income at regular intervals
Less volatile than equities
Less correlation with other financial assets
More dividends than ordinary stocks
1) Central Bank
2) Bank regulations / bank risk management
3) Mortgage valuations
4) Bond valuations
5) In general, financial asset valuation
-Understanding that financial asset value is the present value of future CFs, where the discount
rate captures market conditions, an opportunity costs political uncertainty etc. (different types
of stocks, different types of bonds, different types of loans)
6) Debt market / equity market / stock market
Private Public assets Private Public assets
Loans Bonds Private placements on Public placement, IPO,
equity market SEO etc
Informal Commercial papers
In both markets companies aim to minimise cost of raising funds via debt or equity instruments while
investors are aiming to maximise return / yield.