INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FO

Name of Employee: ABEGAAIL B. LALOG Name of Rater EDERLINDA B. TIQUIO

Position: Teacher - I Position PRINCIPAL - II
Review Period: AUGUST - OCTOBER 2016 Date of Review October 1, 2016
Bureau/Center : PANGAO ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
Service/ Division:

TO BE FILLED UP DURING PLANNING

Weight per PERFORMANCE INDICATORS

MFO's KRA's OBJECTIVES TIMELINE
KRA (Quality, Efficiency, Timelines)
Basic Education Teaching-Learning AUGUST-OCTOBER 2016 40% Daily lesson log were completed and develped with adequate appropriate and updated
Process instructional materials (Q)
Services
10% 5- All Daily Lesson Logs/ Plans had complete parts.
4- Had 4 of the 5 parts of the Daily Lesson Logs/ Plans
3- Had 3 of the 5 parts of the Daily Lesson Logs/ Plans
2- Had 2 of the 5 parts of the Daily Lesson Logs/ Plans
1- Had 1 of the 5 parts of the Daily Lesson Logs/ Plans
Daily Lesson Plan were executed as planned with all the instructional materials properly
used ( E )

5- Instructional materials were appropriate, adequate and

updated for the Daily Lesson Plansactivities
1. Prepared Daily lesson 4- Instructional materials were adequate and updated for
Logs/Plans activities including
the Daily Lesson Plans activities
appropriate, adequate and
updated instructional 3 - Instructional materials were adequate but not updated
materials for the Daily Plans activities
2 - With instructional materials but inadequate for the Daily
Plans activities
1 - No instructional materials presented
Daily Lesson Plans were completed everyday and all objectives are attained (T)

5 - Attained 91-100% of the learning competencies everyday

4- Attained 81-90% of the learning competencies 90% of the time
3- Attained 75-80% of the learning competencies 80% of the time
2- Attained 74% and below of the learning competencies 80%
of the time
1 -Attained 74% and below of the learning process 90% of the time
2. Facilitated learning in
classroom through functional 20% Has used individual learning activities for the pupils handled for every rating period
daily lesson logs/plans and with evidences (Q)
innovative teaching strategies 5 - Used 91-100% Individual Learning activities/cooperative
Page 1 of 21
 daily lesson logs/plans and
innovative teaching strategies
Learning for the pupils
4-Used 81-90% individual Learning activities/Cooperative
Learning for the pupils
3-Used 71-80% Individual Learning activities/Cooperative Learning
2- Used 61-70% Individual Learning activities/Cooperative Learning
1- Used less than 60% Individual Learning activities/
Learning for the pupils

Pupils actively participated in the different activities provided by the teacher (E)

5-Teaching strategies/methodologies produced 91-100%

class interaction
4-Teaching strategies/methodologies produced 81-90% class
interaction
3- Teaching strategies/methodologies produced 71-80% class
interaction

2- Teaching strategies/methodologies produced 61-70% class

interaction

1-Teaching strategies/methodologies produced less than 60%

class interaction

Learning activities are suited to the ability of the pupils and are achieved in the alloted
time frame (T)

5-Had prepared and used 91-100% of updated and adequate

visual aids suited to the ability of the pupils every day
4- Had prepared and used 91-100% of updated and adequate
visual aids suited to the ability of the pupils 4 days of the week
3- Had prepared and used 91-100% of updated and adequate
visual aids suited to the ability of the pupils 3 days of the week
2- Had prepared and used 91-100% of updated and adequate
visual aids suited to the ability of the pupils 2 days of the week
1- Had prepared and used 91-100% of updated and adequate
visual aids suited to the ability of the pupils at least once a week
3. Initiated discipline of pupils 10%
including classroom rules and Discipline inside the classroom such as rules and guidelines are observed (Q)
guidelines in accomplishing 5- Pupils were given 90.01% above guidance as per class rules
individual/group task
and regulations in any activities they will undertake
4- Pupils were given 80.01- 90% above guidance as per class rules
rules and regulations in any activities they will undertake
3- Pupils were given 70.01- 80% above guidance as per class rules
rules and regulations in any activities they will undertake
2- Pupils were given 60.01- 70% above guidance as per class rules
rules and regulations in any activities they will undertake
1- Pupils were given 60 and below guidance as per class rules

Page 2 of 21
 rules and regulations in any activities they will undertake
Pupils were able to manifest positive attitude in following classroom guidelines and
rules in accomplishing individual group task ( E )
5- 91-100% of the pupils were able to manifest positive attitude
towards classroom guidelines and rules
4- 81-90% of the pupils were able to manifest positive attitude
towards classroom guidelines and rules
3 - 71-80% of the pupils were able to manifest positive attitude
towards classroom guidelines and rules
2- 61-70% of the pupils were able to manifest positive attitude
towards classroom guidelines and rules
1 - 60% and below of the pupils were able to manifest positive
attitude towards classroom guidelines and rules

Pupils were able to perform/finish the assigned individual/group task assigned (T)
5- All activities/ individual or group tasks were accomplished.
4- 85 % of the activities/ individual or group tasks were
accomplished.
3- 75 % of the activities/ individual or group tasks were
accomplished.
2- 65 % of the activities/ individual or group tasks were
accomplished.
1- 55 % of the activities/ individual or group tasks were
accomplished.
Pupils/Students 1. Develop and utilize AUGUST-OCTOBER 2016 10% Assessment tools using KAR and other non traditional form of assessment were
Outcome assessment tools using KAR developed and utilized based on the pupils' ability (Q)
5- Conducted 91-100% asesment of the pupils needs, abilities and learning
and other non traditional
form of assessment styles
4- Conducted 81-90% assessment of the pupils need, abilities
and learning styles
3- Conducted 71-80% assessment of pupils needs, abilities and
learning styles
2- Conducted 61-70% assessment of pupils needs, abilities and
learning styles
1- Conducted less than 60% assessment of the pupils needs,
abilities and learning styles
Pupils were able to understand and perform well in the different
assessment activitie ( E )
5- All kinds of test were 91-100% administered and analyzed
4- All kinds of test were 81-90% administered and analyzed
3- All kinds of test were 71-80% administered and analyzed
2 - All kinds of test were 61-70% administered and analyzed
1- 60% and less of the test were administered and analyzed

Page 3 of 21
 Evaluation on written and performance tasks tests were conducted and completed on
prescribed time (T)
5- 100% of the rating s in all subject areas were entered in the Class Progress
Report and reported to parents on time
4- 100% of the ratings in all subject areas were entered in the Class Progress
Report and reported to parents two weeks after the prescribed time
3- 100% of the ratings in all subject areas were entered in the Class Progress
Report and reported to parents four days after the prescribed time
2- 100% of the ratings in all subject areas were entered in the Class Progress
Report and reported to parents one week after the prescribed time
1- 100% of the ratings in all subject areas were entered in the Class Progress
Report was not reported to the parents
2. Evaluate pupils progress 10% 100% of the pupils attained 75% of achievement per subjet area (Q)
with 75% level of 5- 91-100% of the class attained the level of achievement
achievement attained every 4- 81-90% of the class attained the level of achievement
grading period per subject
area 3- 71-80% of the class attained the level of achievement
2- 61-70% of the class attained the level of achievement
1- Less than 60% of the class attained the level of achievement

100% of the pupils were evaluated and result-analyzed ( E )

5- 100% of the pupils were evaluated and 91-100% of the results were analyzed
4- 100% of the pupils were evaluated and 81-90% of the results were analyzed
3- 100% of the pupils were evaluated and 71-80% of the results were analyzed
2- 100% of the pupils were evaluated and 61-70% of the results were analyzed
1- 100% of the pupils were evaluated and less than 60% of the results
were analyzed
Assessment and analysis of test results were completed and submitted on the alloted
time (T)
5- Assessment and analysis of test results were submitted on the alloted time
4- Assessment and analysis were submitted 2 days after the alloted time
3- Assessment and analysis were submitted 4 days after the alloted time
2- Assessment and analysis were submitted one week after the alloted time
1- Assessment and analysis were not submitted at all
3. Conduct 10% Remediation and enrichment program were planned and developed to address the
remediation/enrichment needs of the children (Q)
program to improve the class 5- Remediation and enrichment program were planned and developed in all the 5
performance indicators major learning areas

4- Remediation and enrichment program were planned and developed in all the 4
major learning areas
3- Remediation and enrichment program were planned and developed in all the 3
major learning areas
2- Remediation and enrichment program were planned and developed in all the 2
major learning areas

Page 4 of 21
 1- Remediation and enrichment program were planned and developed in all the 1
major learning areas
Remedial and enrichment program were conducted and periodically evaluated to find
the result ( E )
5- Remediation and enrichment program were coducted to 91-100% of the pupils who need it

4- Remediation and enrichment program were coducted to 81-90% of the pupils who need it

3- Remediation and enrichment program were coducted to 71-80% of the pupils who need it

2- Remediation and enrichment program were coducted to 61-70% of the pupils who need it

1- Remediation and enrichment program were coducted to less than 60%of the pupils who need it

Remediation and enrichment program were conducted every grading period based on
the need of the children ( T )
5- Remediation and enrichment were conducted 20 times per grading period
4- Remediation and enrichment were conducted 15 times per grading period
3- Remediation and enrichment were conducted 10 times per grading period
2- Remediation and enrichment were conducted 7 times per grading period
1- Remediation and enrichment were conducted 5 times per grading period

Community Involvement 1. Conducted regular/periodic AUGUST-OCTOBER 2016 15% Meeting were done periodically to update the parents of their child's development and
Homeroom PTA weakness per subject area (Q)
meetings/conferences 5% 5- Meeting were conducted five times in a school year
4- Meeting were conducted four times in a school year
3- Meeting were conducted three times in a school year
2- Meeting were conducted two times in a school year
1- Meeting was conducted once in a school year

Set/planned agreement during meetings and accomplished the set agreement ( E )

5- Set and planned agreements were 91-100%accomplished

4- Set and planned agreements were 81-90% accomplished
3- Set and planned agreements were 71-80% accomplished
2- Set and planned agreements were 61-70% accomplished
1- Less than 60% of the set and planned agreements were accomplished
Conducted PTA meetings/conferences after examination period and report cards were
presented to the parents (T)
5- Report cards were presented to 91-100% of the parents every rating period
4- Report cards were presented to 81-90% of the parents
3- Report cards were presented to 71-80% of the parents
1- Report cards were presented to less than 60% of the parents
5% Home visitations were done to inform the parents of their child's status in class and if
the child misbehaved (Q)
2. Visit parents of
pupils/students needing 5- Had visited five homes in a year
academic and with behavioral Page 5 of 21
problems monitoring follow
 2. Visit parents of
pupils/students needing
academic and with behavioral 4- Had visited four homes in a year
problems monitoring follow 3- Had visited three homes in a year
up 2- Had visited two homes in a year
1- Had visited one home in a year
Accomplished set visit to parents and resulted to productive result ( E )

5- 91-100% of the children visited at home manifested productive results

4- 81-90% of children visited at home manifested productive results
3- 71-80% of children visited at home manifested productive results
2- 61-70% of children visited at home manifested productive results
1- Less than 60% of the children visited manifested productive results

Home visitations were done everytime it is needed to address immediately each child's
problem (T)
5- The five children and any children with immediate need for home visitation were
addressed
4- The four children and any children with immediate need for home visitation were
addressed

3- The three children and any children with immediate need for home visitation were
addressed

2- The two children and any children with immediate need for home visitation were
addressed

1- One child and any child with immediate need for home visitation were addressed
3. Undertaken/initiate 5%
Projects/activities initiated by parents were accomplished with documentation and
projects/activities sponsored completion report (Q)
by the parents and other 5- Projects initiated by the parents were 100% accomplished
community stakeholders
4- Projects initiated by the parents were 90% accomplished
3- Projects initiated by the parents were 80% accomplished
2- Projects initiated by the parents were 70% accomplished
1- Projects initiated by the parents were 60% or less accomplished
Spearheaded classroom related projects wherein parents solicited for the project
accomplishment ( E )
5- Projects were 100% solicited and accomplished purely by the parents
4- Projects were 90% solicited and accomplished purely by the parents
3- Projects were 80% solicited and accomplished purely by the parents
2- Projects were 70% solicited and accomplished purely by the parents
1- Projects were 60% or less solicited and accomplished purely by the parents

Projects/activities initiated by parents were accomplished at the time set and agreed by
them (T)
5- Projects initiated by the parents were accomplished on time
4- Projects were accomplished one weeks after the time set and agreed on
3- Projects were accomplished two weeks after the time set and agreed on
2- Projects were accomplished three weeks after the time set and agreed on
1- Projects were accomplished a month after the time set and agreed on
Professional Growth 1. Enhance skills through AUGUST-OCTOBER 2016 10%
Attended in professional development trainings initiated by the division, district, and
and Development participation to teacher school (Q)
related trainings/workshops/ 5% 5- Attended five or more professional development trainings
seminars
4- Attended four professional development trainings

Page 6 of 21
 seminars
3- Attended three professional development trainings
2- Attended two professional development trainings
1- Attended one or no professional development trainings
Accomplished tasks given in the trainings produce outputs that will help improve the
quality of teaching ( E )
5- Accomplished 91-100% of the tasks given in the training
4- Accomplished 81-90% of the tasks given in the training
3- Accomplished 71-80% of the tasks given in the training
2- Accomplished 61-70% of the tasks given in the training
1- Accomplished less than 60% of the tasks given in the training

Actively participated and completed the tasks given within the alloted time frame (T)
5- Actively participated and completed the tasks given on time
4- Actively participate and completed the tasks two days after the alloted time

3- Actively participate and completed the tasks four days after the alloted time

2- Actively participate and completed the tasks six days after the alloted time
1- Participated and completed the tasks eight days after the alloted time
2. Participated/Attended 5% Participated/Attended the activities launched by the Division/District and School as per
Division/District and school year round plan of activities (Q)
activities 5- Highly supported the activities launched by DepEd in the Region, Division, District,
and the school

4- Highly supported the activities launched by DepEd in the Division, District and the
school

3- Highly supported activities launched by DepEd in the District and school

2- Highly supported activities launched by DepEd in the school
1- Slightly supported activities launched by DepEd
Actively participated/attended activities launched by the Division/District and School
with complete attendance ( E )
5- Participated/attended activities but missed one
4- Participated/attended activities but missed two
3- Participated/attended activities but missed three
2- Participated/attended activities but missed four
1- Participated/attended activities but missed five
Engaged actively within the duration of Division/District and school activities
( T)
5- Actively participated in the activities always on time and finished the duration of the
activities
4- Moderately active in the activities on time and finished the duration of the activities

3- Participated on time and finished the duration of the activities

2- Participated on time but did not finished the duration of the activities
1- Participated but late and did not finished the duration of the activities
3. Plus Factor 5%
AUGUST-OCTOBER 2016

GSP TROOP LEADER

Page 7 of 21
 GSP TROOP LEADER

ABEGAIL B. LALOG BRENDA E. MAGSINO

Ratee / Teacher I Rater / Master Teacher I

Page 8 of 21
VIEW FORM

TO BE FILLED UP DURING EVALUATION

ACTUAL
RESULTS SCORE*
Q E T RATING

4 4

0.367
3 3

4 4

Page 9 of 21
4 4

0.733

4 4

3 3

3 3

Page 10 of 21
 0.367
5 5

3 3

3 3

0.300

3 3

Page 11 of 21
 3 3

3 3

0.300

3 3

3 3

4 4

Page 12 of 21
 0.333

3 3

3 3

4 4

4 4 0.217

5 5

Page 13 of 21
4 4

4 4

0.200

4 4

4 4

4 4
0.217

5 5

4 4

Page 14 of 21
 4 4 0.200

4 4

4 4

0.183

3 3

4 4

5 5 0.250

Page 15 of 21
 5 0.250

OVER ALL RATING FOR ACCOMPLISHMENTS 3.667

EDERLINDA B. TIQUIO
Approving Authority / Principal II

Page 16 of 21
 INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM
SUMMARY OF RATING

Name of Employee: ABEGAIL B. LALOG Name of Rater: EDERLINDA B. TIQUIO

Position: Teacher I Position Principal II
Review Period: AUGUST-OCTOBER 2016 Date of Review Oct-16
RE
LIPA CITY
Service/Division:

KRA's Weight per KRA OBJECTIVES Weight per Objectives Rating Score
Teaching and Learning Process 40 Objective 1 10% 4 0.367
Objective 2 20% 4 0.733
Objective 3 10% 4 0.367
Pupils / Students Outcomes 30 Objective 1 10% 3 0.300
Objective 2 10% 3 0.300
Objective 3 10% 3 0.333
Community Involvement 15 Objective 1 5% 4 0.217
Objective 2 5% 4 0.200
Objective 3 5% 4 0.217
Professional Growth and 10 Objective 1 5% 4 0.200
Development Objective 2 5% 4 0.183
Plus Factor 5 GSP TROOP LEADER 5% 5 0.250

FINAL RATING 3.667

ADJECTIVAL RATING Very Satisfactory

ABEGAIL B. LALOG BRENDA E. MAGSINO EDERLINDA B. TIQUIO

Ratee/ Teacher I Rater/ Master Teacher I Approving Authority/ Principal II
 PART III: SUMMARY OF RATINGS FOR DISCUSSION
Final Performance Results Rating Adjectival Rating

Accomplishments of KRAs and Objectives 3.143 Satisfactory

Employee-Superior Agreement

The signatures below confirm that the employee and his/her superior have agreed to the contents of the performance as captured in this form.

Name of Employee: Name of Superior:

Signature: Signature:

Date: Date:

PART IV: DEVELOPMENT PLANS

Action Plan (Recommended
Strengths Development Needs Timeline Resources Needed
Developmental Intervention)
1. Participated/Attended 1. Attain the 75% level of achievement 1. Use innovative strategies using 1. Standardize Periodical Test,
Division/District and school activities per subject area. multi-media and manipulative computer, LED TV and
such as Teachers’ Day Celebration, objects in teaching. cellphone.
Independence Day, Team Building and
Others June 2016 to
December 2016

2. Conducted regular/periodic 2. Pursue Post-Graduate Studies 2. Enroll/earn units in Post- 2. Money

Homeroom PTA meetings/conferences Graduate.
following the Reduced Class Friday
Program
June 2016 to
December 2016

MICHELLE T. RUECA LORNA B MARASIGAN FRANCIA C. SILVA, Ed. D.

Ratee/ Teacher I Rater/ Principal II Approval Authority/ District Supervisor
DEPED RPMS form - For Teacher
Resources Needed
ardize Periodical Test,
er, LED TV and
ne.

ey

VA, Ed. D.
strict Supervisor
D RPMS form - For Teacher