Scribd
Upload
79 views1 page

Legaspi Vs CSC

The petitioner requested information from the Civil Service Commission (CSC) about the civil service eligibility of two individuals employed by the Health Department of Cebu City. The CSC denied the request. The petitioner filed a writ of mandamus to compel the CSC to disclose the information. The CSC argued the petitioner did not have standing to file the case. The court held that when a case involves a public right, like the right to information on matters of public concern, any citizen has standing being part of the general public that possesses that right. Therefore, the petitioner had legal standing to bring the suit as a concerned citizen.

Uploaded by

FeBrluado
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
79 views1 page

Legaspi Vs CSC

The petitioner requested information from the Civil Service Commission (CSC) about the civil service eligibility of two individuals employed by the Health Department of Cebu City. The CSC denied the request. The petitioner filed a writ of mandamus to compel the CSC to disclose the information. The CSC argued the petitioner did not have standing to file the case. The court held that when a case involves a public right, like the right to information on matters of public concern, any citizen has standing being part of the general public that possesses that right. Therefore, the petitioner had legal standing to bring the suit as a concerned citizen.

Uploaded by

FeBrluado
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 1

Legaspi vs. CSC G.R. No.

L-72119, May 29, 1987

Facts: The respondent CSC had denied petitioner Valentin Legaspi’s request for information on the civil
service eligibilities of Julian Sibonghanoy and Mariano Agas who were employed as sanitarians in the
Health Department of Cebu City. Sibonghanoy and Agas had allegedly represented themselves as civil
service eligibles who passed the civil service examinations for sanitarians.

Claiming that his right to be informed of the eligibilities of Sibonghanoy and Agas is guaranteed by the
Constitution, and that he has no other plain, speedy and adequate remedy to acquire the information,
petitioner prays for the issuance of the extraordinary writ of mandamus to compel the respondent CSC to
disclose said information.

The respondent CSC takes issue on the personality of the petitioner to bring the suit. It is asserted that
the petition is bereft of any allegation of Legaspi’s actual interest in the civil service eligibilities of
Sibonghanoy and Agas.

Issue: Whether or not the petitioner has legal standing to bring the suit

Held: The petitioner has firmly anchored his case upon the right of the people to information on matters
of public concern, which, by its very nature, is a public right. It has been held in the case of Tanada vs.
Tuvera, 136 SCRA 27, that when the question is one of public right and the object of the mandamus is to
procure the enforcement of a public duty, the people are regarded as the real party in interest, and the
person at whose instigation the proceedings are instituted need not show that he has any legal or special
interest in the result, it being sufficient to show that he is a citizen and as such interested in the
execution of the laws.

It becomes apparent that when a mandamus proceeding involves the assertion of a public right, the
requirement of personal interest is satisfied by the mere fact that the petitioner is a citizen, and
therefore, part of the general public which possesses the right.

The petitioner, being a citizen who as such, is clothed with personality to seek redress for the alleged
obstruction of the exercise of the public right.

You might also like