INDIA RANKINGS 2018

NATIONAL INSTITUTIONAL RANKING FRAMEWORK

Methodology for Ranking of Academic Institutions in India

(RANKING METRICS FOR ENGINEERING)

Ministry of Human Resource Development

 Summary of Ranking Parameters and Weightages- 2018

(Engineering)

Sr. Parameter Marks Weightage

No.
1 Teaching, Learning & Resources 100 0.30
2 Research and Professional Practice 100 0.30
3 Graduation Outcomes 100 0.20
4 Outreach and Inclusivity 100 0.10
5 Perception 100 0.10
S.No. Parameters Marks
1. Teaching, Learning & Resources (TLR) 100
Ranking weight: 0.30
A. Student Strength including Doctoral Students(SS): 20 marks
B. Faculty-student ratio with emphasis on permanent faculty (FSR):
30 marks
C. Combined metric for Faculty with PhD (or equivalent) and
Experience (FQE): 20 marks
D. Financial Resources and their Utilisation (FRU): 30 marks

2. Research and Professional Practice (RP) 100

Ranking weight: 0.30
A. Combined metric for Publications (PU): 35 marks
B. Combined metric for Quality of Publications (QP): 40 marks
C. IPR and Patents: Published and Granted (IPR): 15 marks
D. Footprint of Projects and Professional Practice (FPPP): 10 marks

3. Graduation Outcomes (GO) 100

Ranking weight: 0.20
A. Combined metric for Placement and Higher Studies (GPH): 40
marks
B. Metric for University Examinations (GUE): 15 marks
C. Median Salary (GMS): 25 marks
D. Metric for Number of Ph.D. Students Graduated (GPHD): 20
marks
4. Outreach and Inclusivity (OI) 100
Ranking weight: 0.10
A. Percentage of Students from other States/Countries (Region
Diversity RD): 30 marks
B. Percentage of Women (Women Diversity WD): 30 marks
C. Economically and Socially Challenged Students (ESCS): 20
marks
D. Facilities for Physically Challenged Students (PCS): 20 marks
5. Perception (PR) 100
Ranking weight: 0.10
A. Peer Perception: Employers & Academic Peer (PR): 100 marks
1. Teaching, Learning & Resources (TLR): 100 marks
• Ranking weight: 0.30

• Overall Assessment Metric:

TLR = SS (20) + FSR (30) + FQE (20) + FRU (30)

• Component metrics based on :

A. Student Strength including Ph.D. Students: SS

B. Faculty-Student Ratio with emphasis on permanent faculty: FSR
C. Combined metric for Faculty with PhD (or equivalent) and Experience:
FQE
D. Financial Resources and Their Utilisation: FRU
A. Student Strength including Ph.D. students (SS): 20 Marks

• SS = f(NT, NE) × 15 + f(NP) × 5

• The functions f(NT ,NE) and f(Np) are functions to be determined by NIRF.
• NT: Total sanctioned approved intake in the institution considering all UG and PG
programs of the institution.
• NE: Total number of students enrolled in the institution considering all UG and PG
Programs of the institution.
• Np = Total number of students enrolled for the doctoral program till previous
academic year.

• Primary Data: To be provided in a prescribed Format.

B. Faculty-Student Ratio with emphasis on permanent faculty (FSR): 30 marks

• FSR = 30 × [15 × (F/N)]

• N =NT+ Np
• F: Full time regular faculty in the institution in the previous year.
• Regular appointment means Faculty on Full time basis. Faculty on contract basis/ad-
hoc basis will be considered if the concerned faculty has taught in both the semesters
of academic year 2016-2017.
• Faculty members with Ph.D. and M.E./M.Tech. will be considered and counted here.
Faculty member with a Bachelor’s degree will not be counted.

• Expected ratio is 1:15 to score maximum marks.

• For F/N < 1: 50, FSR will be set to zero.

• Primary Data: Faculty List to be provided in the Prescribed Format.

C. Combined Metric for Faculty with PhD (or equivalent) and Experience (FQE): 20
marks

• FQ = 10 × (FRA/95) , FRA ≤ 95%;

• FQ = 10, FRA> 95%.

• Here FRA is the percentage of Faculty with Ph.D. (or equivalent qualification) with
respect to the total no. of faculty required or actual faculty whichever is higher, in the
previous year.

F1=Fraction with Experience up to 8 years;

F2= Fraction with Experience between 8+ to 15 years;

F3=Fraction with Experience > 15 years.

• FE = 3min(3F1, 1) + 3 min(3F2, 1) + 4 min(3F3, 1)

Rationale: Full marks for a ratio of 1:1:1

• FQE = FQ + FE

• Primary Data: Faculty List in the Prescribed Format.

D: Financial Resources and their Utilisation (FRU): 30 Marks

• FRU = 7.5×f(BC) + 22.5×f(BO)

• BC: Average Annual Capital Expenditure per student for previous three years
pertaining to engineering discipline only. (Excluding expenditure on construction
of new buildings)

• BO: Operational(or Recurring) Expenditure per student for previous three years
pertaining to engineering discipline only. (Excluding maintenance of hostels and
allied services)

• Primary Data: Figures in prescribed format for each.

2.Research and Professional Practice (RP): 100 marks
• Ranking weight: 0.30

• Overall Assessment Metric:

RP = PU(35) + QP(40) + IPR(15) + FPPP(10)

• The component metrics explained on following pages.

A. Combined Metric for Publications: PU

B. Combined Metric for Quality of Publications: QP
C. IPR and Patents: Patents Published and Granted: IPR
D. Footprint of Projects and Professional Practice: FPPP
A.Combined metric for Publications (PU): 35 marks

• PU = 35 × f(P/FRQ)
• P is weighted number of publications as acertained from suitable third party sources.
• FRQ is the maximun of nominal number of faculty members as calculated on the basis
of a required FSR of 1:15 or the available faculty in the institution.

• Sources: Third party sources.

B.Combined metric for Quality of Publications (QP): 40 Marks

• QP = 20 × f (CC/P) + 20× f (TOP25P/P)

• Here CC is Total Citation Count over previous three years.

• P is as computed for PU.
• TOP25P: Number of citations in top 25 percentile averaged over the previous three
years.

• Primary Data: Third Party Sources.

C. IPR and Patents: Patents Published and Granted (IPR): 15 marks

• IPR = IPG + IPP

IPG = 10× f (PG)

• PG is the number of patents granted over the previous three years.

IPP = 5 × f (PP)

• PP: No. of patents published over the previous three years.

• Primary Data: Third Party Sources.

D. Footprint of Projects and Professional Practice (FPPP): 10 marks

• FPPP = FPR + FPC

• FPR = 7.5 × f (RF)

• RF is average annual research funding earnings (amount actually received in rupees)

per faculty at institute level in previous three years.

• FPC = 2.5 × f (CF)

• CF is average annual consultancy amount (amount actually received in rupees) per

faculty at institute level in previous three years.
3. Graduation Outcome (GO):100 marks

• Ranking weight: 0.20

• Overall Assessment Metric:

• GO = GPH(40) + GUE(15) + GMS(25) + GPHD(20)

• The component metrics are explained on the following pages:

A. Combined metric for Placement and Higher Studies: GPH

B. Metric for University Examinations: GUE
C. Median Salary: GMS
D. Metric for Number of Ph.D. Students Graduated: GPHD
A. Combined Metric for Placement and Higher Studies (GPH): 40 marks

• GPH = 40 × (Np/100 +Nhs/100)

• Np = Percentage of graduating students (in UG/ PG programs) placed in the previous

three years.
• Nhs = Percentage of graduating students (in UG/ PG programs) who have been
selected for higher studies in the previous three years.

• Primary Data: To be provided in prescribed format.

B. Metric for University Examinations (GUE): 15 Marks

• GUE = 15 × min [(Ng/80), 1]

• Ng is the percentage of Students (as a fraction of the approved intake), averaged over
previous three years, passing the respective university examinations in stipulated
time for the program in which enrolled.

• Primary Data: To be provided in the prescribed format.

C. Median Salary(GMS): 25 Marks

• GMS = 25 × f (MS)

• MS = Median salary of graduates (in UG/PG program) in the previous three years
from an institution.

• Primary Data: To be provided in the prescribed format.

D. Metric for Number of Ph.D Students Graduated (GPHD): 20 Marks

• GPHD = 20 × f(Nphd)

• Nphd = Average number of Ph.D students graduated (awarded Ph.D) over the previous
three years.

• Primary Data: Number of graduating Ph.D. Students as reflected in the approved

Annual Report/Convocation Report to be provided in the prescribed format.
4. Outreach and Inclusivity (OI): 100 marks
• Ranking weight: 0.10

• Overall Assessment Metric: OI = RD(30) + WD(30) +ESCS(20) + PCS(20)

• The component metrics are explained on following pages:

A. Percentage of Students from other States/ Countries (Region Diversity): RD

B. Percentage of Women (Women Diversity): WD
C. Economically and Socially Challenged Students: ESCS
D. Facilities for Physically Challenged Students: PCS
A. Percentage of Students from other States/ Countries (Region Diversity RD): 30
marks

• RD = 25 × fraction of total students enrolled from other states + 5 × fraction of

students enrolled from other countries

• Primary Data: To be provided in the prescribed format.

B. Percentage of Women (Women Diversity WD): 30 marks

• WD = 15 × (NWS/50) + 15 × (NWF/20)

• NWS are the percentage of Women students.

• NWF are the percentage of Women Faculty including the women members in senior
administrative positions, such as Heads of Departments, Deans or Institute Heads.

• Expectation: 50% women students and 20% women faculty.

• Primary Data: To be provided in the prescribed format.

C.Economically and Socially Challenged Students (ESCS) : 20 marks

• ESCS = 20 × f(Nesc)

• Nesc is the percentage of UG students being provided financial aid by the institution,
government and private bodies to pursue their degree programs.
• Primary Data: To be provided by the institution in the prescribed format.
D. Facilities for Physically Challenged Students (PCS): 20 marks

• PCS = 20 marks, if the Institute provides full facilities for physically challenged
students, as outlined.

Else, in proportion to facilities.

• Basis: Verifiable Responses to Questions.

• Primary Data: To be provided in a prescribed format.

5. Perception (PR) – 100 marks
• Ranking weight: 0.1

• Overall Assessment Metric: PR = 100

• Component metrics are explained in the following pages:

A. Peer Perception: Employers & Academic Peers (PR): 100 marks

A. Peer Perception: Employers & Academic Peer (PR) : 100 marks

• This is to be done through a survey conducted over a large category of Employers,

Professionals from Reputed Organizations and a large category of academics to
ascertain their preference for graduates of different institutions.

• Comprehensive list will be prepared taking into account various sectors, regions, etc.

• Lists to be updated periodically.