75% found this document useful (4 votes)
357 views21 pages

On Bottom Stability

This document provides pipeline and environmental data to calculate on-bottom stability according to DNV RP E305. It includes properties of the steel pipe, coatings, material properties, water depth, currents, waves. Calculations are shown for submerged weight, buoyancy, vertical stability, water particle velocity, hydrodynamic coefficients, and hydrodynamic forces on the pipeline at angles from 0 to 180 degrees. The purpose is to check that the pipeline meets standards for on-bottom stability under the given environmental conditions.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
75% found this document useful (4 votes)
357 views21 pages

On Bottom Stability

This document provides pipeline and environmental data to calculate on-bottom stability according to DNV RP E305. It includes properties of the steel pipe, coatings, material properties, water depth, currents, waves. Calculations are shown for submerged weight, buoyancy, vertical stability, water particle velocity, hydrodynamic coefficients, and hydrodynamic forces on the pipeline at angles from 0 to 180 degrees. The purpose is to check that the pipeline meets standards for on-bottom stability under the given environmental conditions.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 21

ON-BOTTOM STABILITY

STANDARD: DNV RP E305

Pipeline Properties
Outer Steel Pipe Diameter Ds ≔ 273.05

Steel Density ρs ≔ 7700 ――


3

Corrosion Allowance CA ≔ 0

Material Properties
Young's Modulus E ≔ 210 ⋅ 10 3
Poisson's Ratio ν ≔ 0.3
Material Specification API 5L X-52
Manufacturing process Pipe ≔ “SMLS”
SMYS X-52 PSL 2 SMYS ≔ 360
SMTS X-52 PSL 2 SMTS ≔ 460

Coating Data
Corrosion Coating Thickness tcc ≔ 0.96

Corrosion Coating Desnity ρcc ≔ 1300 ――


3

Concrete Coating Density ρc ≔ 3040 ――


3
Environmental Data
Seawater Density ρsw ≔ 1025.2 ――
3

Astronomical Tide HAT ≔ 3.11


LAT ≔ 0

Water Depth d ≔ 92.7

Significant Wave Height Hs.1 ≔ 4.7


Hs.100 ≔ 6.4

Spectral Peak Period Tp.1 ≔ 10.5


Tp.100 ≔ 11.5

Current (Near-bed) Velocity Ur.1 ≔ 0.37 ―

Ur.100 ≔ 0.47 ―

Storm Surge ss1 ≔ 0.54


ss100 ≔ 0.84

Water Depth Reference dref1 ≔ d + HAT + ss1 = 96.35


dref100 ≔ d + HAT + ss100 = 96.65

External Pressure Pe.1 ≔ ρsw ⋅ ⋅ dref1 = ⎛⎝9.687 ⋅ 10 5 ⎞⎠


Pe.100 ≔ ρsw ⋅ ⋅ dref100 = ⎛⎝9.717 ⋅ 10 5 ⎞⎠

2
Kinematic Viscocity v ≔ 1.6 ⋅ 10 -5 ――
On Bottom Stability Calculation

Installation Condition
condition ≔ “installation”

Pipeline Design Parameters:


Concrete Coating Thickness tc ≔ 0
Steel Pipe Thickness ts ≔ 29
Outer pipe diameter incl. Corrosion Coating Dcc ≔ Ds + 2 ⋅ tcc = 0.275
Total Outer Diameter D ≔ Ds + 2 ⋅ tcc + 2 ⋅ tc = 0.275
Internal Diameter Di ≔ Ds - 2 ⋅ ts = 0.215

-Vertical Stability-
Submerged Weight Calculation:
Content Density
ρcont ≔ if condition = “installation” | = 0 ――
3
‖ |
‖ 0 ―― |
‖‖ 3 |
|
else if condition = “hydrotest”|
‖ |
‖ 1025.2 ―― |
3
‖‖ |
else if condition = “operating”|
‖ |
‖ 68.60 ―― |
3
‖‖ |

Submerged Weight ⎛⎝Ws⎞⎠ = Steel Weight + Corrosion Coating Weight +


Concrete Coating Weight +Content Density - Buoyancy

Ws ≔ ―⋅ ⎛⎝⎛⎝Ds 2 - Di 2 ⎞⎠ ⋅ ρs + ⎛⎝Dcc 2 - Ds 2 ⎞⎠ ⋅ ρcc + ⎛⎝D 2 - Dcc 2 ⎞⎠ ρc + ⎛⎝Di 2 ⋅ ρcont⎞⎠ - D 2 ⋅ ρsw⎞⎠ ⋅


4
Ws = ⎛⎝1.092 ⋅ 10 3 ⎞⎠ ―
2

Buoyancy Calculation:
B ≔ ―⋅ D 2 ⋅ ρsw ⋅ = 597.021 ―
2
4
Vertical Stability Check:

Ws + B Ws + B |
――― = 2.83 SG ≔ if ――― ≥ 1.1| = “OK”
B B |
‖ “OK” |
‖ |
else |
‖ “NOT OK”
‖ |

-Lateral Stability-
Water Particle Velocity Calculation:
dref ≔ if condition = “operating”| = 96.35
‖d |
‖ ref100 |
else |
‖d |
‖ ref1 |

Tp ≔ if condition = “operating”| = 10.5


‖T |
‖ p.100 |
else |
‖T |
‖ p.1 |

Hs ≔ if condition = “operating”| = 4.7


‖H |
‖ s.100 |
else |
‖H |
‖ s.1 |
‾‾‾‾
dref
Parameters Tn ≔ ―― = 3.134

Tn
― = 0.299
Tp

Tp
ϕ ≔ ――= 4.843 ――
1
‾‾‾
Hs ―
2

|
|
γ ≔ if ϕ ≤ 3.6 ―― | = 3.3
‾‾ |
‖5 |
‖ |
|
else if ϕ ≥ 5 ―― |
‾‾ |
‖1 |
‖ |
else |
‖ 3.3
‖ |

Significant Water Wave Velocity


0.06 ⋅ Hs
(From graph Fig. 2.1, DnV RP E305) Us ≔ ―――= 0.09 ―
Tn

Zero-Up-Crossing Period
(From graph Fig. 2.2, DnV RP E305) Tu ≔ 1.15 ⋅ Tp = 12.075

Reduction Factor due to Spreading


and Directionality
(assumed to be no reduction) R ≔ 1.0

Water Particle Velocity Us ≔ Us ⋅ R = 0.09 ―

Current Velocity Calculation:


Ur ≔ if condition = “operating”| = 0.37 ―
‖U |
‖ r.100 |
else |
‖U |
‖ r.1 |

Grain size for seabed material d50 ≔ 0.0625


(from Table A.1, DNV RP E305,
for Silt/Very Soft Clay)

Roughness Zo ≔ 5.21 ⋅ 10 -6

Height above seabed where


the curent measured Zr ≔ 3

D
Parameters ―= 5.278 ⋅ 10 4
Zo
Zr
―= 5.758 ⋅ 10 5
Zo

Ratio beween average velocity and


reference steady velocity
UD 1 ⎛⎛ Zo ⎞ ⎛ D ⎞ ⎞
(Eq. A.3, DnV RP E305) ―― = ――――⎜⎜1 + ―⎟ ln ⎜―+ 1⎟ - 1⎟
Ur ⎛ Zr ⎞ ⎝⎝ D ⎠ ⎝ Zo ⎠ ⎠
ln ⎜―+ 1⎟
⎝ Zo ⎠

Average Current Velocity on Pipe


1 ⎛⎛ Zo ⎞ ⎛ D ⎞ ⎞
UD ≔ ―――― ⎜⎜1 + ―⎟ ln ⎜―+ 1⎟ - 1⎟ ⋅ Ur
⎛ Zr ⎞ ⎝⎝ D ⎠ ⎝ Zo ⎠ ⎠
ln ⎜―+ 1⎟
⎝ Zo ⎠
UD = 0.275 ―

Hydrodynamic Coefficient Calculation:

Us
Wave Particle Acceleration As ≔ 2 ⋅ ⋅ ― = 0.047 ―
2
Tu
UD
Current to wave velocity M ≔ ―― = 3.062
Us

Tu
KC number K ≔ Us ⋅ ― = 3.951
D
⎛⎝UD + Us⎞⎠ ⋅ D
Reynold's Number Re ≔ ―――― = 6.28 ⋅ 10 3
v
CD ≔ if Re < 3 ⋅ 10 5 ∧ M ≥ 0.8 = 1.2
‖ 1.2

else
‖ 0.7

CL ≔ 0.9 Based on DnV RP E305


CM ≔ 3.29 Based on DnV RP E305

Friction Coefficient of Very Soft Clay (Based on Soal Tubes)


μs ≔ 0.2

K = 3.951 M = 3.062 and from Carpenter Number (Figure 5.12 DnV RP E305)

We can get Calibration Factor FW ≔ 1.5


Calculation of Hydrodynamic Forces
i ≔ 0 , ―― ‥
180
⎡ 0⎤
⎢ 1⎥
⎢ ⎥
⎢ 2⎥
⎢ 3⎥
⎢ 4⎥
⎢ 5⎥
⎢ ⎥
θi ≔ i = ⎢ 6⎥
⎢ 7⎥
⎢ 8⎥
⎢ 9⎥
⎢ 10 ⎥
⎢ ⎥
⎢ 11 ⎥
⎣ ⋮⎦

Lift Force
⎡ 1.727 ⎤
⎢ 1.727 ⎥
⎢ ⎥
⎢ 1.727 ⎥
⎢ 1.726 ⎥
⎢ 1.725 ⎥
⎢ 1.724 ⎥
1 ρsw 2
⎢ ⎥
FL ≔ ― ⋅ ――⋅ D ⋅ CL ⋅ ⎛⎝Us ⋅ cos ⎛⎝θi⎞⎠ + UD⎞⎠ = ⎢ 1.723 ⎥ ―
2
⎢ 1.721 ⎥
⎢ 1.719 ⎥
⎢ 1.717 ⎥
⎢ 1.714 ⎥
⎢ ⎥
⎢ 1.712 ⎥
⎣⋮ ⎦
Drag Force

⎡ 2.303 ⎤
⎢ 2.303 ⎥
⎢ ⎥
⎢ 2.302 ⎥
⎢ 2.301 ⎥
⎢ 2.3 ⎥
⎢ 2.299 ⎥
1 ρsw 2
⎢ ⎥
FD ≔ ― ⋅ ――⋅ D ⋅ CD ⋅ ⎛⎝Us ⋅ cos ⎛⎝θi⎞⎠ + UD⎞⎠ = ⎢ 2.297 ⎥ ―
2
⎢ 2.295 ⎥
⎢ 2.292 ⎥
⎢ 2.289 ⎥
⎢ 2.286 ⎥
⎢ ⎥
⎢ 2.282 ⎥
⎣⋮ ⎦

Inertia Force
⎡0 ⎤
⎢ 0.017 ⎥
⎢ ⎥
⎢ 0.033 ⎥
⎢ 0.05 ⎥
⎢ 0.067 ⎥
⎢ 0.083 ⎥
D 2 ρsw ⎢ ⎥
FI ≔ ⋅ ―― ⋅ ―― ⋅ CM ⋅ As ⋅ sin ⎛⎝θi⎞⎠ = 0.1
4 ⎢ ⎥―
⎢ 0.117 ⎥
⎢ 0.133 ⎥
⎢ 0.15 ⎥
⎢ 0.166 ⎥
⎢ ⎥
⎢ 0.182 ⎥
⎣⋮ ⎦

⎡ 19.863 ⎤
⎢ 19.987 ⎥
⎢ ⎥
⎢ 20.108 ⎥
⎢ 20.225 ⎥
⎢ 20.34 ⎥
⎢ 20.451 ⎥
⎛ FD + FI + μs ⋅ FL ⎞ ⎢ ⎥
Required Submerged Weight Ws' ≔ ⎜―――――⎟ ⋅ FW = ⎢ 20.559 ⎥ ―
⎝ μs ⎠ ⎢ 20.665 ⎥
⎢ 20.766 ⎥
⎢ 20.865 ⎥
⎢ 20.96 ⎥
⎢ ⎥
⎢ 21.052 ⎥
⎣ ⋮ ⎦
On Bottom Stability Iteration

Wreq ≔ max ⎛⎝Ws'⎞⎠ ⋅ = 218.286 ―


2

Ws = ⎛⎝1.092 ⋅ 10 3 ⎞⎠ ―
2

check ≔ if Ws ≤ Wreq = “OK”


‖ “Need More Concrete Thickness”

else
‖ “OK”

Safety Factor for submerged weight


Ws
SFW ≔ ――= 5.005
Wreq
Hydrotest Condition
condition ≔ “hydrotest”

Pipeline Design Parameters:


Concrete Coating Thickness tc ≔ 0
Steel Pipe Thickness ts ≔ 29
Outer pipe diameter incl. Corrosion Coating Dcc ≔ Ds + 2 ⋅ tcc = 0.275
Total Outer Diameter D ≔ Ds + 2 ⋅ tcc + 2 ⋅ tc = 0.275
Internal Diameter Di ≔ Ds - 2 ⋅ ts = 0.215

-Vertical Stability-
Submerged Weight Calculation:
Content Density
ρcont ≔ if condition = “installation” | = ⎛⎝1.025 ⋅ 10 3 ⎞⎠ ――
3
‖ |
‖ 0 ―― |
‖‖ 3 |
|
else if condition = “hydrotest”|
‖ |
‖ 1025.2 ―― |
3
‖‖ |
else if condition = “operating”|
‖ |
‖ 68.60 ―― |
3
‖‖ |

Submerged Weight = Steel Weight + Corrosion Coating Weight +


Concrete Coating Weight +Content Density - Buoyancy
Ws ≔ ―⋅ ⎛⎝⎛⎝Ds 2 - Di 2 ⎞⎠ ⋅ ρs + ⎛⎝Dcc 2 - Ds 2 ⎞⎠ ⋅ ρcc + ⎛⎝D 2 - Dcc 2 ⎞⎠ ρc + ⎛⎝Di 2 ⋅ ρcont⎞⎠ - D 2 ⋅ ρsw⎞⎠ ⋅
4
Ws = ⎛⎝1.458 ⋅ 10 3 ⎞⎠ ―
2

Buoyancy Calculation:
B ≔ ―⋅ D 2 ⋅ ρsw ⋅ = 597.021 ―
2
4

Vertical Stability Check:


Ws + B | Ws + B
SG ≔ if ――― ≥ 1.1| = “OK” ――― = 3.442
B | B
‖ “OK” |
‖ |
else |
‖ “NOT OK”
‖ |
-Lateral Stability-
Water Particle Velocity Calculation:
dref ≔ if condition = “operating”| = 96.35
‖d |
‖ ref100 |
else |
‖d |
‖ ref1 |

Tp ≔ if condition = “operating”| = 10.5


‖T |
‖ p.100 |
else |
‖T |
‖ p.1 |

Hs ≔ if condition = “operating”| = 4.7


‖H |
‖ s.100 |
else |
‖H |
‖ s.1 |
‾‾‾‾
dref
Parameters Tn ≔ ―― = 3.134

Tn
― = 0.299
Tp

Tp
ϕ ≔ ――= 4.843 ――
1
‾‾‾
Hs ―
2

|
γ ≔ if ϕ ≤ 3.6 ―― | = 3.3
‾‾ |
‖5 |
‖ |
|
else if ϕ ≥ 5 ―― |
‾‾ |
‖1 |
‖ |
else |
‖ 3.3
‖ |

Significant Water Wave Velocity


0.06 ⋅ Hs
(From graph Fig. 2.1, DnV RP E305) Us ≔ ―――= 0.09 ―
Tn
Zero-Up-Crossing Period
(From graph Fig. 2.2, DnV RP E305) Tu ≔ 1.15 ⋅ Tp = 12.075

Reduction Factor due to Spreading


and Directionality
(assumed to be no reduction) R ≔ 1.0

Water Particle Velocity Us ≔ Us ⋅ R = 0.09 ―

Current Velocity Calculation:


Ur ≔ if condition = “operating” = 0.37 ―
‖U
‖ r.100
else
‖U
‖ r.1

Grain size for seabed material d50 ≔ 0.0625


(from Table A.1, DNV RP E305,
for Silt/Very Soft Clay)

Roughness Zo ≔ 5.21 ⋅ 10 -6

Height above seabed where


the curent measured Zr ≔ 3

D
Parameters ―= 5.278 ⋅ 10 4
Zo
Zr 5
―= 5.758 ⋅ 10
Zo
Ratio beween average velocity and
reference steady velocity
UD 1 ⎛⎛ Zo ⎞ ⎛ D ⎞ ⎞
(Eq. A.3, DnV RP E305) ―― = ――――⎜⎜1 + ―⎟ ln ⎜―+ 1⎟ - 1⎟
Ur ⎛ Zr ⎞ ⎝⎝ D ⎠ ⎝ Zo ⎠ ⎠
ln ⎜―+ 1⎟
⎝ Zo ⎠
Average Current Velocity on Pipe
1 ⎛⎛ Zo ⎞ ⎛ D ⎞ ⎞
UD ≔ ―――― ⎜⎜1 + ―⎟ ln ⎜―+ 1⎟ - 1⎟ ⋅ Ur
⎛ Zr ⎞ ⎝⎝ D ⎠ ⎝ Zo ⎠ ⎠
ln ⎜―+ 1⎟
⎝ Zo ⎠
UD = 0.275 ―
Hydrodynamic Coefficient Calculation:

Us
Wave Particle Acceleration As ≔ 2 ⋅ ⋅ ― = 0.047 ―
2
Tu
UD
Current to wave velocity M ≔ ―― = 3.062
Us

Tu
KC number K ≔ Us ⋅ ― = 3.951
D
⎛⎝UD + Us⎞⎠ ⋅ D
Reynold's Number Re ≔ ―――― = 6.28 ⋅ 10 3
v
CD ≔ if Re < 3 ⋅ 10 5 ∧ M ≥ 0.8 = 1.2
‖ 1.2

else
‖ 0.7

CL ≔ 0.9 Based on DnV RP E305


CM ≔ 3.29 Based on DnV RP E305

Friction Coefficient of Very Soft Clay (Based on Soal Tubes)


μs ≔ 0.2

K = 3.951 M = 3.062 and from Carpenter Number (Figure 5.12 DnV RP E305)

We can get Calibration Factor FW ≔ 1.5

Calculation of Hydrodynamic Forces


i ≔ 0 , ―― ‥
180
⎡ 0⎤
⎢ 1⎥
⎢ ⎥
⎢ 2⎥
⎢ 3⎥
⎢ 4⎥
⎢ 5⎥
⎢ ⎥
θi ≔ i = ⎢ 6⎥
⎢ 7⎥
⎢ 8⎥
⎢ 9⎥
⎢ 10 ⎥
⎢ ⎥
⎢ 11 ⎥
⎣ ⋮⎦
Lift Force
⎡ 1.727 ⎤
⎢ 1.727 ⎥
⎢ ⎥
⎢ 1.727 ⎥
⎢ 1.726 ⎥
⎢ 1.725 ⎥
⎢ 1.724 ⎥
1 ρsw 2
⎢ ⎥
FL ≔ ― ⋅ ――⋅ D ⋅ CL ⋅ ⎛⎝Us ⋅ cos ⎛⎝θi⎞⎠ + UD⎞⎠ = ⎢ 1.723 ⎥ ―
2
⎢ 1.721 ⎥
⎢ 1.719 ⎥
⎢ 1.717 ⎥
⎢ 1.714 ⎥
⎢ ⎥
⎢ 1.712 ⎥
⎣⋮ ⎦

Drag Force

⎡ 2.303 ⎤
⎢ 2.303 ⎥
⎢ ⎥
⎢ 2.302 ⎥
⎢ 2.301 ⎥
⎢ 2.3 ⎥
⎢ 2.299 ⎥
1 ρsw 2
⎢ ⎥
FD ≔ ― ⋅ ――⋅ D ⋅ CD ⋅ ⎛⎝Us ⋅ cos ⎛⎝θi⎞⎠ + UD⎞⎠ = 2.297 ―
2 ⎢ ⎥
⎢ 2.295 ⎥
⎢ 2.292 ⎥
⎢ 2.289 ⎥
⎢ 2.286 ⎥
⎢ ⎥
⎢ 2.282 ⎥
⎣⋮ ⎦

Inertia Force
⎡0 ⎤
⎢ 0.017 ⎥
⎢ ⎥
⎢ 0.033 ⎥
⎢ 0.05 ⎥
⎢ 0.067 ⎥
⎢ 0.083 ⎥
D 2 ρsw ⎢ ⎥
FI ≔ ⋅ ―― ⋅ ―― ⋅ CM ⋅ As ⋅ sin ⎛⎝θi⎞⎠ = ⎢ 0.1 ⎥ ―
4
⎢ 0.117 ⎥
⎢ 0.133 ⎥
⎢ 0.15 ⎥
⎢ 0.166 ⎥
⎢ ⎥
⎢ 0.182 ⎥
⎣⋮ ⎦
⎡ 19.863 ⎤
⎢ 19.987 ⎥
⎢ ⎥
⎢ 20.108 ⎥
⎢ 20.225 ⎥
⎢ 20.34 ⎥
⎢ 20.451 ⎥
⎛ FD + FI + μs ⋅ FL ⎞ ⎢ ⎥
Required Submerged Weight Ws' ≔ ⎜―――――⎟ ⋅ FW = ⎢ 20.559 ⎥ ―
⎝ μs ⎠ ⎢ 20.665 ⎥
⎢ 20.766 ⎥
⎢ 20.865 ⎥
⎢ 20.96 ⎥
⎢ ⎥
⎢ 21.052 ⎥
⎣ ⋮ ⎦

Wreq ≔ max ⎛⎝Ws'⎞⎠ ⋅ = 218.286 ―


2

Ws = ⎛⎝1.458 ⋅ 10 3 ⎞⎠ ―
2

check ≔ if Ws ≤ Wreq = “OK”


‖ “Need More Concrete Thickness”

else
‖ “OK”

Safety Factor for submerged weight


Ws
SFW ≔ ――= 6.678
Wreq
Operating Condition
condition ≔ “operating”

Pipeline Design Parameters:


Concrete Coating Thickness tc ≔ 0
Steel Pipe Thickness ts ≔ 29
Outer pipe diameter incl. Corrosion Coating Dcc ≔ Ds + 2 ⋅ tcc = 0.275
Total Outer Diameter D ≔ Ds + 2 ⋅ tcc + 2 ⋅ tc = 0.275
Internal Diameter Di ≔ Ds - 2 ⋅ ts = 0.215

-Vertical Stability-
Submerged Weight Calculation:
Content Density
ρcont ≔ if condition = “installation” | = 68.6 ――
3
‖ |
‖ 0 ―― |
‖‖ 3 |
|
else if condition = “hydrotest”|
‖ |
‖ 1025.2 ―― |
3
‖‖ |
else if condition = “operating”|
‖ |
‖ 68.60 ―― |
3
‖‖ |

Submerged Weight = Steel Weight + Corrosion Coating Weight +


Concrete Coating Weight +Content Density - Buoyancy
Ws ≔ ―⋅ ⎛⎝⎛⎝Ds 2 - Di 2 ⎞⎠ ⋅ ρs + ⎛⎝Dcc 2 - Ds 2 ⎞⎠ ⋅ ρcc + ⎛⎝D 2 - Dcc 2 ⎞⎠ ρc + ⎛⎝Di 2 ⋅ ρcont⎞⎠ - D 2 ⋅ ρsw⎞⎠ ⋅
4
Ws = ⎛⎝1.117 ⋅ 10 3 ⎞⎠ ―
2

Buoyancy Calculation:
B ≔ ―⋅ D 2 ⋅ ρsw ⋅ = 597.021 ―
2
4

Vertical Stability Check:


Ws + B | Ws + B
SG ≔ if ――― ≥ 1.1| = “OK” ――― = 2.871
B | B
‖ “OK” |
‖ |
else |
‖ “NOT OK”
‖ |
-Lateral Stability-
Water Particle Velocity Calculation:
dref ≔ if condition = “operating”| = 96.65
‖d |
‖ ref100 |
else |
‖d |
‖ ref1 |

Tp ≔ if condition = “operating”| = 11.5


‖T |
‖ p.100 |
else |
‖T |
‖ p.1 |

Hs ≔ if condition = “operating”| = 6.4


‖H |
‖ s.100 |
else |
‖H |
‖ s.1 |
‾‾‾‾
dref
Parameters Tn ≔ ―― = 3.139

Tn
― = 0.273
Tp

Tp
ϕ ≔ ――= 4.546 ――
1
‾‾‾
Hs ―
2

|
γ ≔ if ϕ ≤ 3.6 ―― | = 3.3
‾‾ |
‖5 |
‖ |
|
else if ϕ ≥ 5 ―― |
‾‾ |
‖1 |
‖ |
else |
‖ 3.3
‖ |

Significant Water Wave Velocity


0.08 ⋅ Hs
(From graph Fig. 2.1, DnV RP E305) Us ≔ ―――= 0.163 ―
Tn
Zero-Up-Crossing Period
(From graph Fig. 2.2, DnV RP E305) Tu ≔ 1.15 ⋅ Tp = 13.225

Reduction Factor due to Spreading


and Directionality
(assumed to be no reduction) R ≔ 1.0

Water Particle Velocity Us ≔ Us ⋅ R = 0.163 ―

Current Velocity Calculation:


Ur ≔ if condition = “operating” = 0.47 ―
‖U
‖ r.100
else
‖U
‖ r.1

Grain size for seabed material d50 ≔ 0.0625


(from Table A.1, DNV RP E305,
for Silt/Very Soft Clay)

Roughness Zo ≔ 5.21 ⋅ 10 -6

Height above seabed where


the curent measured Zr ≔ 3

D
Parameters ―= 5.278 ⋅ 10 4
Zo
Zr 5
―= 5.758 ⋅ 10
Zo
Ratio beween average velocity and
reference steady velocity
UD 1 ⎛⎛ Zo ⎞ ⎛ D ⎞ ⎞
(Eq. A.3, DnV RP E305) ―― = ――――⎜⎜1 + ―⎟ ln ⎜―+ 1⎟ - 1⎟
Ur ⎛ Zr ⎞ ⎝⎝ D ⎠ ⎝ Zo ⎠ ⎠
ln ⎜―+ 1⎟
⎝ Zo ⎠

Average Current Velocity on Pipe


1 ⎛⎛ Zo ⎞ ⎛ D ⎞ ⎞
UD ≔ ―――― ⎜⎜1 + ―⎟ ln ⎜―+ 1⎟ - 1⎟ ⋅ Ur
⎛ Zr ⎞ ⎝⎝ D ⎠ ⎝ Zo ⎠ ⎠
ln ⎜―+ 1⎟
⎝ Zo ⎠
UD = 0.35 ―
Hydrodynamic Coefficient Calculation:

Us
Wave Particle Acceleration As ≔ 2 ⋅ ⋅ ― = 0.077 ―
2
Tu
UD
Current to wave velocity M ≔ ―― = 2.145
Us

Tu
KC number K ≔ Us ⋅ ― = 7.844
D

⎛⎝UD + Us⎞⎠ ⋅ D
Reynold's Number Re ≔ ―――― = 8.816 ⋅ 10 3
v
CD ≔ if Re < 3 ⋅ 10 5 ∧ M ≥ 0.8 = 1.2
‖ 1.2

else
‖ 0.7

CL ≔ 0.9 Based on DnV RP E305


CM ≔ 3.29 Based on DnV RP E305

Friction Coefficient of Very Soft Clay (Based on Soal Tubes)


μs ≔ 0.2

K = 7.844 M = 2.145 and from Carpenter Number (Figure 5.12 DnV RP E305)

We can get Calibration Factor FW ≔ 1.5

Calculation of Hydrodynamic Forces


i ≔ 0 , ―― ‥
180
⎡ 0⎤
⎢ 1⎥
⎢ ⎥
⎢ 2⎥
⎢ 3⎥
⎢ 4⎥
⎢ 5⎥
⎢ ⎥
θi ≔ i = ⎢ 6⎥
⎢ 7⎥
⎢ 8⎥
⎢ 9⎥
⎢ 10 ⎥
⎢ ⎥
⎢ 11 ⎥
⎣ ⋮⎦
Lift Force
⎡ 3.404 ⎤
⎢ 3.404 ⎥
⎢ ⎥
⎢ 3.403 ⎥
⎢ 3.401 ⎥
⎢ 3.399 ⎥
⎢ 3.396 ⎥
1 ρsw 2
⎢ ⎥
FL ≔ ― ⋅ ――⋅ D ⋅ CL ⋅ ⎛⎝Us ⋅ cos ⎛⎝θi⎞⎠ + UD⎞⎠ = ⎢ 3.392 ⎥ ―
2
⎢ 3.388 ⎥
⎢ 3.383 ⎥
⎢ 3.377 ⎥
⎢ 3.371 ⎥
⎢ ⎥
⎢ 3.364 ⎥
⎣⋮ ⎦

Drag Force

⎡ 4.539 ⎤
⎢ 4.538 ⎥
⎢ ⎥
⎢ 4.537 ⎥
⎢ 4.535 ⎥
⎢ 4.532 ⎥
⎢ 4.528 ⎥
1 ρsw 2
⎢ ⎥
FD ≔ ― ⋅ ――⋅ D ⋅ CD ⋅ ⎛⎝Us ⋅ cos ⎛⎝θi⎞⎠ + UD⎞⎠ = 4.523 ―
2 ⎢ ⎥
⎢ 4.517 ⎥
⎢ 4.511 ⎥
⎢ 4.503 ⎥
⎢ 4.495 ⎥
⎢ ⎥
⎢ 4.486 ⎥
⎣⋮ ⎦

Inertia Force
⎡0 ⎤
⎢ 0.028 ⎥
⎢ ⎥
⎢ 0.055 ⎥
⎢ 0.083 ⎥
⎢ 0.11 ⎥
⎢ 0.138 ⎥
D 2 ρsw ⎢ ⎥
FI ≔ ⋅ ―― ⋅ ―― ⋅ CM ⋅ As ⋅ sin ⎛⎝θi⎞⎠ = ⎢ 0.165 ⎥ ―
4
⎢ 0.193 ⎥
⎢ 0.22 ⎥
⎢ 0.248 ⎥
⎢ 0.275 ⎥
⎢ ⎥
⎢ 0.302 ⎥
⎣⋮ ⎦
⎡ 39.146 ⎤
⎢ 39.35 ⎥
⎢ ⎥
⎢ 39.545 ⎥
⎢ 39.733 ⎥
⎢ 39.914 ⎥
⎢ 40.086 ⎥
⎛ FD + FI + μs ⋅ FL ⎞ ⎢ ⎥
Required Submerged Weight Ws' ≔ ⎜―――――⎟ ⋅ FW = ⎢ 40.251 ⎥ ―
⎝ μs ⎠ ⎢ 40.407 ⎥
⎢ 40.556 ⎥
⎢ 40.697 ⎥
⎢ 40.83 ⎥
⎢ ⎥
⎢ 40.955 ⎥
⎣ ⋮ ⎦

Wreq ≔ max ⎛⎝Ws'⎞⎠ ⋅ = 410.611 ―


2

Ws = ⎛⎝1.117 ⋅ 10 3 ⎞⎠ ―
2

check ≔ if Ws ≤ Wreq = “OK”


‖ “Need More Concrete Thickness”

else
‖ “OK”

Safety Factor for submerged weight


Ws
SFW ≔ ――= 2.72
Wreq

You might also like