2.12 Mass Flowmeters-Miscellaneous: R. Siev K. O. Plache B. G. Lipták J. E. Jamison
2.12 Mass Flowmeters-Miscellaneous: R. Siev K. O. Plache B. G. Lipták J. E. Jamison
FT
R. SIEV (1969) K. O. PLACHE (1982) B. G. LIPTÁK (1995)
Mass
J. E. JAMISON (2003) Flow Sheet Symbol
Types A. Flow computers using inputs from volumetric flow sensors and densitometers, or
pressure/temperature transmitters
B. Doppler ultrasonic or magnetic flowmeter and radiation-type densitometer com-
binations
C. Angular momentum and other similar principles
D. Linear hydraulic Wheatstone-type
Design Pressures and Magmeter/radiation units available up to 255 PSIG (17.5 bars) and 300°F (150°C)
Temperatures
Errors (Inaccuracy) Varies with the designs, generally approximately ±1% of full scale
Costs A. Flow computers without the sensors can cost approximately $600 minimum; $700
to $4000 normally, depending on options, features, remote communications capa-
bilities, and so on
B. A 6-in. (150-mm) magmeter/radiation combination costs about $13,000
C. Costs vary substantially with size and materials of construction
D. Price starts at about $2000 minimum; normally $7000 to $13,000, depending on
model, options, and range required
A knowledge of mass flow rates is necessary in combustion weighing systems, solids flowmeters, and the more frequently
fuel control, reactor recipe formulations, and many other appli- used liquid/gas mass flowmeters (such as Coriolis and thermal
cations, including the mining and dredging, food, pulp and types) are discussed in Sections 2.11 and 2.13. In this section,
paper, pharmaceuticals, and chemical industries. The various some of the other mass flow detection methods are covered.
237
© 2003 by Béla Lipták
238 Flow Measurement
RADIATION-TYPE MASS FLOWMETERS as a single, obstructionless mass flow sensor. Its features and
materials of construction are similar to those of a magnetic
One of the earliest methods of mass flow determination was or ultrasonic flowmeter except that it is bulkier and more
to install two separate sensors—one to measure the volumet- expensive because it incorporates a radiation-type densitom-
ric flow and the other to detect the density of the flowing eter. If the flow sensor is a magnetic flowmeter, the unit is
stream—and then to use the two transmitter signals as inputs also limited to use on process fluids having at least 3.0 µS/cm
into a mass flow computing module. This approach was fea- conductivity.
sible, but it required coordination between the products of
different suppliers and corrections for such process variables
as temperature, pressure, viscosity, particle size, and velocity
ANGULAR MOMENTUM-TYPE MASS FLOWMETERS
profile changes. The introduction of density/mass flow sys-
tems has made it easier to use this technique. The key work-
The principle of angular momentum can best be described
ing component in these combinational designs is the multi-
by referring to Newton’s second law of angular motion and
ple-input transmitter (Figure 2.12a), which, in addition to a
the definition of angular momentum, using the following
radiation-type density input, accepts a flow measurement sig-
notation:
nal from any volumetric flowmeter. Based on these two
inputs, the microprocessor-based transmitter generates an
H = angular momentum (lbf-ft-sec)
output signal that relates to mass flow. 2
I = moment of inertia (lbf-ft )
A further improvement occurred in the design of these
ω = angular velocity (rad/sec)
density/mass flow systems in which the density and volu-
α = angular acceleration (rad/sec )
2
metric flow sensors were combined in a single package
(Figure 2.12b). These units are composed of a either a Dop- Υ = torque (ft-lbf)
pler ultrasonic flowmeter or a magnetic flowmeter and a r = radius of gyration (ft)
gamma-radiation-based densitometer, all in a single unit includ- m = mass (slugs)
ing a microcomputer. These mass flow units do not require t = time (sec)
compensation for changes in process variables and are installed
Newton’s second law of angular motion states that
Indicator/ Y = Iα 2.12(1)
Radiation Transmitter
Type Density
Sensor and defines that
2
I = mr 2.12(3)
FIG. 2.12a
Combination mass flow system. Equation 2.12(1) becomes
Y = mr α
2
Field 2.12(4)
Coil
Process and Equation 2.12(2) becomes
Fluid Pipe
Electrode Electrode
H = mr ω
2
2.12(5)
Because
Gamma
Detector ω
Source α= 2.12(6)
t
Magnetic
Field Field Coil
Equation 2.12(4) becomes
FIG. 2.12b
Mass flowmeter combining a magnetic flowmeter and a radiation- m 2
Υ = rω 2.12(7)
type densitometer in a single unit. t
m
Solving for mass flow rate, , (lbm/sec), we get Constant Torque-Hysteresis Clutch
t
Another angular-momentum type mass flowmeter eliminates
m Υ the necessity of making a torque measurement after imparting
= 2.12(8)
t r 2ω a constant torque to the fluid stream. The relationship between
mass flow and torque is
Also, dividing both sides of Equation 2.12(5) by t,
m Y
= 2 2.12(10)
H m 2 t rω
= rω 2.12(9)
t t
Therefore, if Υ is held at a constant value, and since r is a
2
Pickup 1 Pickup 2
Fluid
Path
Restraining
Spring
Housing
Turbine 1 Turbine 2
FIG. 2.12c
Impeller-turbine mass flowmeter. (Illustration reproduced by per- FIG. 2.12d
mission of the General Electric Co.) Twin-turbine mass flowmeter.
Boiler producing
20000 lb per hour
at 160 psia and 480°F
FIG. 2.12h
Plant steam balance example.
(300 mm) and above. Also, the flow computer approach sees Bibliography
many practical applications in many industries.
Accurate mass flow detection frequently can increase the Albertz, T., Mass Flow Measurements in Dust, Krupp-Koppers, Essen,
efficiency of processes or allow for optimization, which Germany, April 1980.
ASME Research Committee on Fluid Meters, Fluid Meters, Their Theory
results in energy or fuel conservation in combustion systems. and Application, 5th ed., 1959.
Babb, M., New mass flowmeter design claims improved reliability, Control
Eng., May 1990.
Reference Bugher, G., Coriolis flowmeters, Meas. Control, September 1990.
Close, D. L., Cryogenic Mass Flowmeter, ISA Symposium, Pittsburgh, PA,
1. Plache, K. O., Coriolis/gyroscopic flow meter, Mech. Eng., 36, 1979. Paper No. 1–6–34, May 1971.
Eibl, C., Is mass flow measurement increasing too rapidly? Meas. Control, Schietinger, M., Mass flow vs. volumetric flow, Meas. Control, September
September 1990. 1990.
Flowmeter measures mass of fluid motion, Chemical Processing, November Sheriff, D., Mass flow control, Meas. Control, September 1990.
1982. Snell, C. C., Relative Volume Fraction Measurement of Gas/Liquid or
Hall, J., Coriolis mass flowmeter reduces pressure loss, Instrum. Control Solid/Liquid Flow with a Rotating Field Conductance Gauge, ISA
Syst., October 1989. Symposium, 1979.
Harrie, P. M., Mass flow and density, Meas. Control, April 1991. Spitzer, D. W., Industrial Flow Measurement, 2nd ed., ISA, Research
Hayward, A. J., Choose the flowmeter right for the job, Process. J., 1980. Triangle Park, NC, 1990.
Laskaris, E. K., The measurement of flow, Automation, 1980. Spitzer, D. W., What affects flowmeter performance, InTech, February 1993.
Li, Y. T. and Lee, S. Y., Fast-response true-mass-rate flowmeter, Trans. Waterbury, R., Vortex-mass meters tap information, Control, July 2000.
ASME, 75, 835–841, 1953. Watson, G. A., Flowmeter types and their usage, Chartered Mech. Eng. J.,
Lomas, D. J., Selecting the right flowmeter, Instrum. Technol., 1977. 1978.
Mass flowmeters, Meas. Control, September 1991. Zapolin, R.E., New Ways to Meet User Needs for SCADA Mass Flow
Miller, R. W., Flow Measurement Engineering Handbook, 3rd ed., McGraw- Monitoring, 1990 ISA Conference, Paper #90–0633, New Orleans,
Hill, New York, 1996. 1990.