Lesson Plan in Practical Research 2
Date: 7-10-2019 Yr. Section: 12-St. Peregrine
I. OBJECTIVES
Content Standard: The learner demonstrates understanding of
1. The criteria in selecting, citing, and synthesizing related literature;
2. The ethical standards in writing related literature;
3. The formulation of conceptual framework
4. The research hypotheses (if appropriate)
5. The definition of terms as used in the study
Performance Standard: The learner is able to
1. select, cite, and synthesize judiciously related literature and use sources according
to ethical standards.
2. Formulate clearly conceptual framework, research hypotheses (if appropriate),a nd
define terms used in study
3. Present objectively written review of related literature and conceptual framework.
Learning Competencies: The learner
Selects relevant literature
Specific Objectives:
The learner
defines the review of related literature
determines the different purposes of reviewing related literature
II. SUBJECT MATTER
A. Content: Learning from Others and Reviewing the Literature
B. Resources: Baraceros, E. L. (2016). Practical Research 2. Quezon City: Rex Bookstore, Inc.
Faltado, R. E., Bombita, M. B., Boholano, H. B., & Pogoy, A. M. (2016). Practical Research 2
(Quantitative Research for SHS). Manila: Lorimar Publishing, Inc.
PDF from https://libguides.scu.edu/c.php?g=175682&p=1157719
https://uq.edu.au/student-services/pdf/learning/lit-reviews-for-rx-students-v7.pdf
C. Materials: laptop, projector if available
III. LESSON PROPER
A. Activity: In a piece of paper, ask the learners to copy the following and using the research topic they are
interested in fill the two columns.
Key words to search for Method or way of searching
B. Analysis: 1. What keywords are you going to use in looking for literature relevant for your research?
2. Where will you look for these keywords?
3. How are you going to identify if these sources are relevant to your topic or not?
4. What do you do if you are reviewing related literature?
C. Abstraction: Discuss the definition of “Review of Related Literature” and the different purposes in writing a
literature review.
D. Application: What misconceptions about writing the review of related literature could you identify?
IV. EVALUATION: Fill in the blanks with the correct answers to complete the text.
Review of related literature happens in two ways: (1) _________ and systematic review.
Systematic review is for (2) _______; traditional for qualitative research. A review of statistical
results makes you use (3) ______ kind of systematic review. All test results are applicable to (4)
________ except those coming from (5) ______ studies. (6) ______ review through meta-
analysis are given by (7) ______ studies not by (8) ________ that are characterized by
dissimilar research aspects. Whatever studies the statistical results come from, these should be
(9) _____-based results; meaning they are based on facts. Not giving importance to proofs or
evidence, you resort to presenting literature review results being (10) ________.
V. ASSIGNMENT:
ML: ID: