Scribd
Upload
446 views4 pages

Midterm

This document provides instructions for a midterm quiz on usability evaluation methods. It includes a 15 point multiple choice section testing definitions of different evaluation techniques, as well as short answer and long answer questions about applying specific techniques. The quiz can be completed using notes and resources.

Uploaded by

Swarup Banerjee
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
446 views4 pages

Midterm

This document provides instructions for a midterm quiz on usability evaluation methods. It includes a 15 point multiple choice section testing definitions of different evaluation techniques, as well as short answer and long answer questions about applying specific techniques. The quiz can be completed using notes and resources.

Uploaded by

Swarup Banerjee
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 4

Name:________________________

HCI 460: Usability Evaluation Methods


Midterm Quiz
Autumn 2008
Due Thursday October 23 for the live section
Due Sunday October 26 for the online section

This is a take-home quiz. You may turn in a hardcopy or submit a softcopy through the
COL web site.

For Part I, initially answer questions without the benefit of the book or notes. Then
correct answers using provided solutions and explain any discrepancies. For the first part,
you will not be penalized for having any initially incorrect questions provided that they
are corrected with explanations. Even correct answers should benefit from additional
comments and explanations. Your score will be partially based on the quality of your
comments. Use a different font or color when correcting answers or adding comments so
that they are easily distinguished from the initial answers. Finally, use the provided
answers to obtain an estimated score for Part I (your calculated score for Part I is for your
own assessment and will not be used for scoring the quiz).

Part II can be completed with notes and the book. No correct answers will be provided
for this part.

Part I -- 15 points

Multiple choice (1 point each). Circle the best answer.

1. Post-test questionnaires (conducted after a usability test) are particularly useful for
measuring
a) safety.
b) efficiency.
c) learnability.
d) user satisfaction.

2. A pluralistic walkthrough
a) is usually conducted at the end of the development process.
b) is often conducted with low-fidelity designs.
c) requires having several alternate designs.
d) requires a fully functional prototype.

3. Providing accelerators (e.g. keyboard shortcuts) mostly addresses


a) utility.
b) efficiency.
c) learnability.
d) attitude (or likeability).
4. A method that does not require human participants serving as test users is the
a) usability test.
b) pluralistic walkthrough.
c) Rubin’s comparison test.
d) heuristic evaluation.

5. The cognitive walkthrough mainly evaluates a product's


a) utility.
b) efficiency.
c) learnability.
d) likeability..

Short answer questions.

6. Provide one reason why Rick Spencer thinks discussing possible solutions while
conducting a cognitive walkthrough is not an effective use of time. (2 points)

7. Present two reasons why scripting the test monitor’s greeting and instructions is a
good idea. (2 points)

8. Present one advantage to using a pluralistic walkthrough instead of a cognitive


walkthrough. (2 points)

2
9. Your team of usability experts wants to quickly identify potential usability problems
throughout a Web site. Unfortunately, you have no time to recruit and use human
participants. Which evaluation method do you use? Why? (2 points)

10. Describe one circumstance when the actions for the cognitive walkthrough should
be constructed and analyzed at the micro-level (e.g. mouse-clicks and keystrokes). (2
points)

3
Part II – 15 points (5 points each question)

These questions pertain to the Chicago Reader Restaurant Finder, which can be accessed
with the following URL:
http://www.chicagoreader.com/cgi-bin/rrr/form.cgi?/
To answer these questions, you may use notes, texts and other resources as you find them
useful. Correct answers will not be provided for this part.

When answers questions, you may assume the following about the users and the context
of use:

Users:
 Can successfully identify and use standard web controls including text fields,
buttons, checkboxes and drop-down menus.
 Use web-based online stores to purchase items at least 5 times within the last year.
 Have used forms to find content in a web application.
 Do not have previous experience with the Chicago Reader Restaurant Finder.

Context of use: users would like to find a restaurant for personal dining based on a
variety of factors including recommendations, cuisine, price and location.

1. Using analysis based upon a heuristic evaluation or a cognitive walkthrough, identify


a potential usability problem. Explain the problem in terms of your analysis. (1 – 2
paragraphs)

2. Develop a research question that could be addressed by asking users to complete a


task in a usability test.

3. Consider a task that would address your research question. Write the task instructions
that could be given to a test user to see how he or she completes the task.

You might also like