0% found this document useful (0 votes)
63 views25 pages

Fabrice EMERIAULT: Eotechnical Arthquake Ngineering

This document discusses the seismic behavior of foundations. It covers shallow foundations and their potential failure modes of sliding, loss of bearing capacity, and rotational failure during earthquakes. It also discusses deep foundations and their seismic behavior, including kinematic interaction due to free field ground movements and inertial interaction due to structural inertia forces. Deep foundations require analysis of lateral deflection, shear forces at soil layer interfaces, vertical cyclic loads, and effects of liquefaction.

Uploaded by

Torpir
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
63 views25 pages

Fabrice EMERIAULT: Eotechnical Arthquake Ngineering

This document discusses the seismic behavior of foundations. It covers shallow foundations and their potential failure modes of sliding, loss of bearing capacity, and rotational failure during earthquakes. It also discusses deep foundations and their seismic behavior, including kinematic interaction due to free field ground movements and inertial interaction due to structural inertia forces. Deep foundations require analysis of lateral deflection, shear forces at soil layer interfaces, vertical cyclic loads, and effects of liquefaction.

Uploaded by

Torpir
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 25

GEOTECHNICAL EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING

2010 - 2011

Fabrice EMERIAULT
GENERAL OUTLINE
 Introduction
 Elements of engineering seismology

 Cyclic and dynamic behaviour of soils

 Liquefaction of soils

 Seismic behaviour of retaining walls

 Seismic slope stability and design of earth dams

 Seismic behaviour of foundations

 Seismic behaviour of buried structures


SEISMIC BEHAVIOUR OF
FOUNDATIONS
SEISMIC BEHAVIOUR OF FOUNDATIONS
 Introduction
 Shallow foundations

 Deep foundations
INTRODUCTION
INTRODUCTION
 During earthquakes, forces applied to foundations include:
 Static loading: gravity
 Transient dynamic inertial forces

 Behaviour of the foundations must be analysed under these


loadings
 Effect on bearing capacity
 Effect on settlements or permanent horizontal displacements
 Effect on bending moments and shear forces in deep foundations
SHALLOW FOUNDATIONS
SHALLOW FOUNDATIONS
 During earthquakes, forces applied to the foundation
include:
 Static loading: gravity + other dead loads
 Transient dynamic inertial forces
 Horizontal
 Vertical

 Possible failure mechanisms

 Sliding  Loss of bearing capacity

 Rotational failure
SLIDING
 Worst condition: Fv minimum and Fh maximum

 Simplified approach:
 Similar to that of the sliding block but
 With β = 0
 And δ (soil-structure friction angle) instead of φ: τmax = σn tan δ

 Possible estimation of the horizontal displacement by the


Newmark method
LOSS OF BEARING CAPACITY
 Pseudo-static approach
 Inclination of the resultant load
 Inertia effects in the soil mass
 Perfect plasticity and limit analysis

 Several approaches in the literature:


 Sarma (1990)
 Richards & Elms (1991)
 Pecker & Salencon (1991)
 Gharamani & Berrill (1995)
 Gharamani & Berrill (1995)

Bearing capacity q = ½ γ Β Νγ + q Nq + c Nc

Coefficients depend on φ and on the horizontal seismic factor kc


 Gharamani & Berrill (1995)

Bearing capacity q = ½ γ Β Νγ + q Nq + c Nc

Coefficients depend on φ and on the horizontal seismic factor kc


RAFT FOUNDATIONS
 Sliding: the rafts can resist to sliding
because of peripheric « beche »

 Loss of bearing capacity: unusual (except in case of


liquefaction)
 Rotational failure: observed during Mexico EQ (1985)

 Complete analysis: Dynamic soil-structure interaction


 Based on Winkler’s approach:
 Non linear spring
 Viscous damping
 Plasticty can included
GENERAL DISPOSITIONS
 Homogeneous foundation system with rigid connections
between footings

Homogeneous foundation Different foundation


system systems
 Horizontal foundation system in an homogeneous soil
DEEP FOUNDATIONS
DEEP FOUNDATIONS Lateral pile
deflection

 Kinematic interaction:
 Free field ground movements
induce horizontal deflection of the
deep foundation Free field
ground
movements

 Inertial interaction
 Inertia forces in the structure
induce horizontal forces and M M
moment on the pile head.
 Rocking of the structure can induce T
vertical cyclic loads
(traction/compression)
 Kinematic interaction:
 Analysis with the subgrade reaction metgod with the
appropriate p-y curves (non linear elasto plastic springs)

Y
Lateral pile deflection y(z)

d4y
EI 4 + K f . y ( z ) = K f . g ( z ) + p0 ( z )
dz

Free field ground


movements g(z)

P
Pl=pl.B
Kfc
Pf=pf.B
2Kfc
y

Accidental loads of very short duration 18

Z
 Kinematic interaction:
 Possible large shear forces at the interface between soil layers
with strong contrast of stiffness
 It is preferable to use small diameter piles: more flexibility

Flexible Rigid deep


pile foundation
 Inertial interaction:
 Horizontal deflection (in addition to the kinematic interaction
effects)
 Case of end-bearing piles: reduced embedment depth in the
bearing soil stratum to keep an effect of articulation

Reduced embedment: Large embedment:


Effect of articulation Cantilever effect
 Particular case of liquefiable soil layer

22
 Inertial interaction:
 Vertical cyclic loads
 Analyse the possible pull-out induced by vertical upwards
loads
 Case of end-bearing piles: avoid the punching through the
bearing stratum
 Inertial interaction:
 Vertical cyclic loads
 Analyse the possible pull-out induced by
vertical upwards loads

Quc cyclic ultimate load

Qus static ultimate load


Qave average permanent load

With Nf the number of cycles that


will be applied to the pile and Qave / Qus

Determine Qc/Qus and then Quc = Qave + Qc


 Additional vertical loads:
 Induced by the liquefaction of a soil
layer
 Avoid the negative skin friction by a
coating (for example with bitumen) of
the pile on the length of the pile above
the liquefiable soil layer

You might also like