Clinical Assessment of The Child With Intestinal Failure
Clinical Assessment of The Child With Intestinal Failure
From the Section of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, University of Colorado Denver School of
Medicine and The Children’s Hospital, Aurora, Colorado.
KEYWORDS The management of the child with intestinal failure is complex, and it is developing into a multispe-
Short bowel cialty field of its own led by expert teams of both transplant and nontransplant surgeons, gastroenter-
syndrome; ologists, and dieticians. Patients are at risk for medical, surgical, and nutritional complications that
Parenteral nutrition should be anticipated so that they can be prevented or managed appropriately. Catheter associated
associated liver infections and intestinal failure associated liver diseases are important complications that impact the
disease; likelihood of bowel adaptation and long-term survival. The clinical assessment of a pediatric intestinal
Citrulline; failure patient should include evaluation of the child within the context of recognized prognostic
Micronutrient factors.
deficiency; © 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Catheter associated
infection
Intestinal failure (IF) is the end result of any disease state Identification of the underlying disease
that causes chronic dependence on total parenteral nutrition and anatomy
(TPN) to maintain adequate growth, hydration, or micronu-
trient balance. In pediatric patients, the primary etiology of The initial assessment of the infant or child with IF should
IF is short bowel syndrome (SBS) resulting from surgical include identification of the patient’s underlying disease and
resection of the small bowel. The goals in the management anatomy. Table 1 summarizes the etiologies of IF, which
of an IF patient are to provide adequate nutrition for the include SBS, motility disorders, and congenital enteropa-
child to grow and develop normally and to promote bowel thies that lead to chronic malabsorption. SBS is the most
adaptation while monitoring and treating the complications frequent cause of IF in children.1 In a rare setting of an
of the underlying disease and parenteral nutrition (PN). The infant with prolonged TPN requirement and no clear under-
clinical assessment of a pediatric patient with IF must take lying diagnosis, a thorough evaluation for other etiologies
into account an understanding of the patient’s underlying (congenital enteropathy and primary motility disorder)
disease, anthropometric and biochemical evaluation of nu- should be completed. For the neonate with intractable diar-
tritional status, and recognition of the important complica- rhea, evaluation should include endoscopy with careful re-
tions of IF and TPN that limit survival and stratify prognosis view of small intestinal and ultrastructural histopathology.
in the pediatric patient. The assessment of the infant or child with presumed bowel
dysmotility leading to IF requires a complex, coordinated
evaluation that may include specialized motility evalua-
tions.
The significance of identifying the underlying diagnosis
Address reprint requests and correspondence: Jason S. Soden, MD,
Section of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, The Chil-
is relevant in the concept of “irreversible” or “permanent”
dren’s Hospital, 13123 E. 16th Avenue, B290, Aurora, CO 80045. IF. Certain etiologies of IF, including primary enterocyte
E-mail address: Soden.jason@tchden.org. disorders, severe dysmotility states, and potentially long
1055-8586/$ -see front matter © 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1053/j.sempedsurg.2009.11.002
Soden Assessment of a Child With Intestinal Failure 11
persistent IF, despite attempts at bowel rehabilitation, espe- No discussion regarding the clinical assessment of pedi-
cially those patients with progressive complications or lim- atric IF is complete without mention of the importance of
itations to parenteral therapy. These complications include PN-associated liver disease, referred to in this article as
either recurrent, severe episodes of catheter-associated in- IF-associated liver disease (IFALD). Across the retrospec-
fection (CAI) or limitation of central venous access because tive studies in pediatric IF, the most consistent negative
of venous occlusions and thromboses. Thus, in the clinical prognostic indicator for overall survival is the presence of
assessment of the pediatric patient with IF, it is important to IFALD. IFALD is seen in 40%-60% of pediatric IF patients,
try and stratify each individual patient within the realm of and up to 16.6% may progress to end-state liver disease.26,27
factors that may predict either favorable or poor outcomes. In multiple studies, IFALD is an established predictor of
Because there is a markedly heterogeneous population of patient mortality or PN dependence.21,22,28,29 IFALD is a
pediatric patients with IF as a common end road, the task of multifactorial disease, likely resulting from several factors
predicting outcomes is difficult. Published data are largely unique to the pediatric patient on long-term PN, including
from single center, retrospective studies that are carried out the presence of infection/sepsis, bowel stasis, anatomic fac-
over a number of years with a diverse population of IF tors that affect enterohepatic bile acid circulation, suscepti-
patients, primarily SBS Definitions of SBS and IF have bility of the neonatal liver to cholestatic injury, and factors
varied in published series, and this has led to variability in relevant to the TPN itself that include macronutrient com-
key reported outcomes, such as patient mortality.17 Further- position, contamination/toxicity, and micronutrient excess-
more, as novel therapies are pioneered and used by individ- es/deficiencies.30 Because of the multifactorial etiopatho-
ual centers (including parenteral lipid modification for liver genesis of IFALD, there are no identified single-patient
disease and surgical lengthening procedures), individual factors that would uniformly predict occurrence or severity
patient factors that were, in previous years, more static (for of the disease. Age may be an important predicting factor
instance, residual small bowel length and presence of per- for liver disease, in that neonatal patients are more likely to
sistent cholestasis), may be considered more dynamic vari- develop aggressive, cholestatic liver disease in contrast to
ables in the current era. the histologic steatosis seen in adults.30,31 Sepsis is also an
With these limitations of the available, retrospective data important cofactor for the development of IFALD, and
in mind, the clinical assessment of the patient with IF should retrospective studies have illustrated that the timing (early
be performed with consideration of the factors that predict onset) and frequency of CAI in SBS predict both the oc-
successful or poor outcomes. Table 2 highlights some of the currence and severity of IFALD.27,32 Andorsky et al18 have
key positive and negative prognostic factors in pediatric demonstrated the advancement of enteral nutrition (or dis-
SBS and IF that have been identified by recent retrospective continuation of TPN) to be an important factor in predicting
studies.7,15,18-22 Regarding the SBS patient’s postsurgical the reversal of biochemical cholestasis. Thus, the clinical
anatomy, the residual length of the small intestine, presence assessment of the child with IF requires establishment of
of ileocecal valve or colon, and establishment of intestinal risk factors for IFALD development, and when indicated,
continuity have all been demonstrated relatively consistent defining the presence and severity of liver disease.
to help predict the ability to wean PN.3,23,24 In separate
retrospective analyses, residual bowel length of ⬎15-40 cm
or ⬎10% of actual small bowel length at the time of resec-
tion have been associated with a high prediction of success- From retrospective data to the clinical
ful adaptation.19,21,22 The percentage of daily kilocalories assessment of the patient with IF
provided enterally at 6, 12, or 24 weeks may provide pre-
The management of the pediatric patient with IF entails a
dictive information about the ability to wean of TPN.18,25
balance between promotion of growth/bowel adaptation
Other patient factors, including the underlying disease (gas-
versus recognition and treatment of the complications of
troschisis), prematurity, or other systemic complications
IF/SBS and TPN therapy. Table 3 summarizes the compli-
may affect patient prognosis.
cations seen in IF patients. In general, the most severe
complications are those related to the necessity to provide
TPN. Complications of the underlying disease, especially in
Table 2 Predictors of outcomes in pediatric SBS and IF
SBS, are dependent on the child’s anatomy, enteral intake,
Positive factors Negative factors and other factors. The assessment of the IF patient requires
Residual bowel length ⬎ Residual bowel length ⬍ 15-20
a generalized understanding of these complications so that
35-40 cm cm or ⬍ 10% age-expected problems can be identified and managed aggressively.
normal
Presence of ICV or colon Prematurity/neonates
Older infants/children Presence of persistent liver
disease Assessment of nutritional and fluid status
Presence of bacterial overgrowth
Underlying disease: gastroschisis Clinically, the first task in assessment is to ascertain the
child’s nutritional status. Accurate measurements of weight,
Soden Assessment of a Child With Intestinal Failure 13
ing summary of clinical deficiency syndromes and recom- gical bowel length and anatomy in the SBS patient has been
mended laboratory evaluations. previously emphasized, and the physical and radiographic
In patients who receive parenteral lipid therapy, serum examinations may help to assess bowel dilation, motility,
triglyceride levels should be routinely followed up. Surveil- and length. In the setting of SBS or primary motility disor-
lance for essential fatty acid deficiency is advised for pa- ders, abdominal radiographs may demonstrate dilated loops
tients who are either on omega-3 fatty acid-based lipid of a small bowel. Air fluid levels may be demonstrated in
solutions or with significant fat malabsorption that have areas of mechanical obstruction, or in chronic intestinal
been weaned off parenteral lipids,. Essential fatty acid de- pseudo-obstruction. Other objective evaluations of bowel
ficiency may present clinically in an infant with sparse hair, motility including manometry and transit studies may pro-
poor weight gain, poor wound healing, and thrombocytope- vide insight into pathophysiology or bowel function in sus-
nia, and laboratory evaluation confirms an elevated ratio of pected primary motility disorders with IF.47 Patients with
eicosatrienoic acid: arachidonic acid (triene: tetraene).46 SBS may have disordered motility due to the disruption in
normal neuroendocrine patterns in the postsurgical bowel.
When indicated, contrast radiology may be used as a clinical
Assessment of bowel length and function tool to assess dilation, motility, and length. Nightingale et
al48 reported a high correlation between radiographic and
Along with the nutritional evaluation of the IF patient, the surgical measurements of small bowel length in 18 adult
clinical assessment should involve an estimation of the SBS patients. Recently, Rossi et al49 reported their experi-
child’s residual bowel function. The relevance of postsur- ence in estimation of small bowel length on radiological
Soden Assessment of a Child With Intestinal Failure 15
films with a hand-held opisometer, and they were able to serves as an indicator of bowel adaptation, in which enteral
correlate objective evidence of bowel growth by this advancement and parenteral weaning are generally propor-
method with bowel adaptation and ability to wean off PN in tional. Since 100% enteral adaptation is the ultimate goal in
8 pediatric patients. IF management, one must carefully assess the patient’s
Apart from estimation of bowel length and motility, enteral access. Frequently, the patient with IF requires con-
estimation of bowel dilation by GI contrast series may play tinuous feeding, generally via a gastrostomy tube, to opti-
a role in predicting the important pathophysiologic conse- mize both absorption and adaptation. Alternative enteral
quences of bacterial overgrowth. Stagnant, dilated loops of access routes, including gastrojejunal tubes or direct jejunal
bowel, especially in the setting of a patient with an entero- feeding tubes are considered in the setting of gastric or
colonic anastomosis, may precipitate small intestinal bacte- proximal bowel dysmotility and feeding intolerance. A sec-
rial overgrowth. Figure 1 demonstrates pathologic small ondary goal in clinical management is for pediatric IF pa-
bowel dilation in a patient with SBS and IF. Objective tients to achieve both oral and enteral autonomy, without
assessment for small intestinal bacterial overgrowth in- dependence on supplemental enteral support. Oral aversion
cludes hydrogen breath testing or quantitative culture from
and feeding difficulties are relatively common in the pedi-
small intestinal fluid, although the clinical utility of these
atric IF population, namely due to chronic dependence on
evaluations in the management of pediatric IF and SBS
nutritional support since the neonatal period. Thus, the clin-
remains controversial. Furthermore, in the present era,
ical assessment should include evaluation of enteral caloric
where nontransplant surgical intervention may be consid-
intake as an indicator of adaptation and bowel function, and
ered to relieve intestinal dysmotility and promote intestinal
lengthening and adaptation, demonstration of adequate should also be focused on appreciation of enteral access and
bowel dilation on GI contrast series may at least provide a oral feeding skills and progress.
road map of the therapeutic possibility of these surgical Recently, serum or plasma citrulline levels have been
“steps.” identified as a potential biomarker of functional enterocyte
A direct correlate to bowel function is the assessment of mass. Citrulline is a nonessential amino acid produced pri-
a child’s enteral progress. Sondheimer et al25 reviewed their marily in the enterocyte by the metabolism of glutathione
experience in 27 infants with SBS and IF and found that the and praline. Several studies have correlated circulating cit-
percentage of daily calories provided enterally at 12 weeks rulline level with functional small bowel enterocyte mass
adjusted age significantly correlated with the duration of and absorptive capacity.50-59 Table 5 highlights recent stud-
TPN dependence. Therefore, progress in enteral nutrition ies involving citrulline levels in pediatric patients with SBS.
Data available from the clinical utility of this assay are
promising, and warrant further investigation.
Other complications in the pediatric IF patient ical outcomes, including liver disease. Referral to a center
with nutritional, medical, and surgical expertise in the mul-
Key features of the clinical evaluation of the IF patient have tispecialty care of these complex patients is advised. More
been addressed thus far, including assessment of nutritional studies into novel and potentially noninvasive diagnostic
status, residual bowel function, enteral tolerance and access, tools are warranted, and prospective, multicenter studies are
infection rate, catheter access, and liver disease. Long-term needed to better assess relevant outcomes and therapies.
follow-up of the patient requires an ongoing assessment of
these key areas, in addition to awareness of other compli-
cations that may occur.
Metabolic bone disease has been reported in pediatric References
and adult patients with IF.45,72 The etiology of bone demi-
neralization is most likely multifactorial, related to malab- 1. De Marco G, Barabino A, Gambarara M, et al. Network approach to
sorption of minerals (calcium, phosphorus) and vitamin D. the child with primary intestinal failure. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr
2006;43:S61-7 (suppl 1).
In a series of 18 patients with SBS who had been weaned off 2. Goulet O, Fusaro F, Lacaille F, et al. Permanent intestinal failure.
parenteral support, subjects were found to have decreased Indian Pediatr 2008;45:753-63.
bone mineral content measured by dual-energy x-ray ab- 3. Goulet O, Ruemmele F, Lacaille F, et al. Irreversible intestinal failure.
sorptiometry compared to controls. However, these differ- J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2004;38:250-69.
ences were not significant when adjusted for differences in 4. Wessel JJ, Kocoshis SA. Nutritional management of infants with short
bowel syndrome. Semin Perinatol 2007;31:104-11.
weight and height between the subjects and control group.72 5. Weaver LT, Austin S, Cole TJ. Small intestinal length: a factor
More studies into this area will optimally help define pa- essential for gut adaptation. Gut 1991;32:1321-3.
rameters for surveillance bone densitometry imaging in the 6. Touloukian RJ, Smith GJ. Normal intestinal length in preterm infants.
IF population. J Pediatr Surg 1983;18:720-3.
Luminal bacterial fermentation of malabsorbed carbohy- 7. Goday PS. Short bowel syndrome: how short is too short? Clin Peri-
natol 2009;36:101-10.
drates in SBS may lead to production and accumulation of 8. Spencer AU, Neaga A, West B, et al. Pediatric short bowel syndrome:
D-lactate, which causes the clinical syndrome of D-lactic redefining predictors of success. Ann Surg 2005;242:403-9; discussion
acidosis.73 The child with D-lactic acidosis presents with 409-12.
the onset of neurologic symptoms, including altered mental 9. Vanderhoof JA, Langnas AN. Short-bowel syndrome in children and
status accompanied by an anion gap positive metabolic adults. Gastroenterology 1997;113:1767-78.
10. Goulet O, Colomb-Jung V, Joly F. Role of the colon in short bowel
acidosis. Diagnosis is confirmed by confirming elevated syndrome and intestinal transplantation. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr
D-lactate levels in plasma or urine. 2009;48:S66-71 (suppl 2).
Fat malabsorption in the setting of a patient with an 11. Kaufman SS, Loseke CA, Lupo JV, et al. Influence of bacterial over-
intact colon (and increased colonic oxalate absorption) may growth and intestinal inflammation on duration of parenteral nutrition in
lead to renal stones. Specifically, ongoing fat malabsorption children with short bowel syndrome. J Pediatr 1997;131:356-61.
12. Cole CR, Ziegler TR. Small bowel bacterial overgrowth: a negative
binds luminal calcium, leaving luminal oxalate unbound factor in gut adaptation in pediatric SBS. Curr Gastroenterol Rep
and free to accumulate in the kidneys. The resultant calcium 2007;9:456-62.
oxalate precipitation may lead to nephrolithiasis. Although 13. Phillips JD, Raval MV, Redden C, et al. Gastroschisis, atresia, dys-
an uncommon problem in infants and younger children with motility: surgical treatment strategies for a distinct clinical entity.
IF, adults with SBS and intact colon have up to a 25% J Pediatr Surg 2008;43:2208-12.
14. Payne NR, Pfleghaar K, Assel B, et al. Predicting the outcome of
chance of developing symptomatic kidney stones.35 newborns with gastroschisis. J Pediatr Surg 2009;44:918-23.
Luminal injury from malabsorption of carbohydrates and 15. Duro D, Kamin D, Duggan C. Overview of pediatric short bowel
bile acids, potentially coupled with SBBO, may lead to a syndrome. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2008;47:S33-6 (suppl 1).
spectrum of mucosal injury in SBS and IF patients. Nonin- 16. Ruiz P, Kato T, Tzakis A. Current status of transplantation of the small
fectious colitis was reported in 81% of infants in Denver intestine. Transplantation 2007;83:1-6.
17. Wales PW, de Silva N, Kim JH, et al. Neonatal short bowel syndrome:
with SBS between 1985 and 1988, and is clinically charac- a cohort study. J Pediatr Surg 2005;40:755-62.
terized as bloody, watery, malabsorptive diarrhea.74 In ad- 18. Andorsky DJ, Lund DP, Lillehei CW, et al. Nutritional and other
dition, anastomotic ulcers have been reported in pediatric postoperative management of neonates with short bowel syndrome
patients as a long-term complication following enteroco- correlates with clinical outcomes. J Pediatr 2001;139:27-33.
lonic resection, and may present with frank gastrointestinal 19. Goulet O, Baglin-Gobet S, Talbotec C, et al. Outcome and long-term
growth after extensive small bowel resection in the neonatal period: a
hemorrhage or occult blood loss.44,75 survey of 87 children. Eur J Pediatr Surg 2005;15:95-101.
20. Mian SI, Dutta S, Le B, et al. Factors affecting survival to intestinal
transplantation in the very young pediatric patient. Transplantation
2008;85:1287-9.
21. Quiros-Tejeira RE, Ament ME, Reyen L, et al. Long-term parenteral
Summary nutritional support and intestinal adaptation in children with short
bowel syndrome: a 25-year experience. J Pediatr 2004;145:157-63.
The clinical assessment of the pediatric IF patient should 22. Spencer AU, Kovacevich D, McKinney-Barnett M, et al. Pediatric
include attention to bowel anatomy and function, nutritional short-bowel syndrome: the cost of comprehensive care. Am J Clin
status, and the important complications that influence clin- Nutr 2008;88:1552-9.
18 Seminars in Pediatric Surgery, Vol 19, No 1, February 2010
23. Mayr JM, Schober PH, Weissensteiner U, et al. Morbidity and mor- 46. Friedman Z, Shochat SJ, Maisels MJ, et al. Correction of essential fatty
tality of the short-bowel syndrome. Eur J Pediatr Surg 1999;9:231-5. acid deficiency in newborn infants by cutaneous application of sun-
24. Gupte GL, Beath SV, Kelly DA, et al. Current issues in the manage- flower-seed oil. Pediatrics 1976;58:650-4.
ment of intestinal failure. Arch Dis Child 2006;91:259-64. 47. Connor FL, Di Lorenzo C. Chronic intestinal pseudo-obstruction:
25. Sondheimer JM, Cadnapaphornchai M, Sontag M, et al. Predicting the assessment and management. Gastroenterology 2006;130:S29-36.
duration of dependence on parenteral nutrition after neonatal intestinal 48. Nightingale JM, Bartram CI, Lennard-Jones JE. Length of residual
resection. J Pediatr 1998;132:80-4. small bowel after partial resection: correlation between radiographic
26. Kelly DA. Intestinal failure-associated liver disease: what do we know and surgical measurements. Gastrointest Radiol 1991;16:305-6.
today? Gastroenterology 2006;130:S70-7. 49. Rossi L, Kadamba P, Hugosson C, et al. Pediatric short bowel syn-
27. Sondheimer JM, Asturias E, Cadnapaphornchai M. Infection and cho- drome: adaptation after massive small bowel resection. J Pediatr Gas-
lestasis in neonates with intestinal resection and long-term parenteral troenterol Nutr 2007;45:213-21.
nutrition. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 1998;27:131-7. 50. Santarpia L, Catanzano F, Ruoppolo M, et al. Citrulline blood levels as
28. Weber TR, Keller MS. Adverse effects of liver dysfunction and portal indicators of residual intestinal absorption in patients with short bowel
hypertension on intestinal adaptation in short bowel syndrome in syndrome. Ann Nutr Metab 2008;53:137-42.
children. Am J Surg 2002;184:582-6; discussion 586. 51. Crenn P, Coudray-Lucas C, Thuillier F, et al. Postabsorptive plasma
29. Coran AG, Spivak D, Teitelbaum DH. An analysis of the morbidity citrulline concentration is a marker of absorptive enterocyte mass and
and mortality of short-bowel syndrome in the pediatric age group. Eur intestinal failure in humans. Gastroenterology 2000;119:1496-505.
J Pediatr Surg 1999;9:228-30. 52. Crenn P, De Truchis P, Neveux N, et al. Plasma citrulline is a
30. Carter BA, Shulman RJ. Mechanisms of disease: update on the mo- biomarker of enterocyte mass and an indicator of parenteral nutrition
lecular etiology and fundamentals of parenteral nutrition associated in HIV-infected patients. Am J Clin Nutr 2009;90:587-94.
cholestasis. Nat Clin Pract Gastroenterol Hepatol 2007;4:277-87. 53. Crenn P, Messing B, Cynober L. Citrulline as a biomarker of intestinal
31. Kelly DA. Liver complications of pediatric parenteral nutrition— failure due to enterocyte mass reduction. Clin Nutr 2008;27:328-39.
epidemiology. Nutrition 1998;14:153-7. 54. Crenn P, Vahedi K, Lavergne-Slove A, et al. Plasma citrulline: a
32. Hermans D, Talbotec C, Lacaille F, et al. Early central catheter marker of enterocyte mass in villous atrophy-associated small bowel
infections may contribute to hepatic fibrosis in children receiving disease. Gastroenterology 2003;124:1210-9.
long-term parenteral nutrition. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2007;44: 55. Fitzgibbons S, Ching YA, Valim C, et al. Relationship between serum
459-63. citrulline levels and progression to parenteral nutrition independence
in children with short bowel syndrome. J Pediatr Surg 2009;44:928-32.
33. Sokol RJ, Stall C. Anthropometric evaluation of children with chronic
56. Bailly-Botuha C, Colomb V, Thioulouse E, et al. Plasma citrulline
liver disease. Am J Clin Nutr 1990;52:203-8.
concentration reflects enterocyte mass in children with short bowel
34. Wu J, Tang Q, Feng Y, et al. Nutrition assessment in children with
syndrome. Pediatr Res 2009;65:559-63.
short bowel syndrome weaned off parenteral nutrition: a long-term
57. Celik Y, Celik F. Serum citrulline levels in infants with short bowel
follow-up study. J Pediatr Surg 2007;42:1372-6.
syndrome. J Pediatr 2006;148:848; author reply 848-9.
35. Nightingale J, Woodward JM. Guidelines for management of patients
58. Rhoads JM, Plunkett E, Galanko J, et al. Serum citrulline levels
with a short bowel. Gut 2006;55:iv1-12 (suppl 4).
correlate with enteral tolerance and bowel length in infants with short
36. Koletzko B, Goulet O, Hunt J, et al. Guidelines on paediatric paren-
bowel syndrome. J Pediatr 2005;146:542-7.
teral nutrition of the European Society of Paediatric Gastroenterology,
59. Jianfeng G, Weiming Z, Ning L, et al. Serum citrulline is a simple
Hepatology and Nutrition (ESPGHAN) and the European Society for
quantitative marker for small intestinal enterocytes mass and absorp-
Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism (ESPEN), supported by the Euro-
tion function in short bowel patients. J Surg Res 2005;127:177-82.
pean Society of Paediatric Research (ESPR). J Pediatr Gastroenterol
60. Colomb V, Dabbas-Tyan M, Taupin P, et al. Long-term outcome of
Nutr 2005;41:S1-87 (suppl 2).
children receiving home parenteral nutrition: a 20-year single-center ex-
37. Dahlstrom KA, Ament ME, Medhin MG, et al. Serum trace elements
perience in 302 patients. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2007;44:347-53.
in children receiving long-term parenteral nutrition. J Pediatr 1986; 61. Diamanti A, Basso MS, Castro M, et al. Prevalence of life-threatening
109:625-30. complications in pediatric patients affected by intestinal failure. Trans-
38. Papageorgiou T, Zacharoulis D, Xenos D, et al. Determination of trace plant Proc 2007;39:1632-3.
elements (Cu, Zn, Mn, Pb) and magnesium by atomical absorption in 62. Hodge D, Puntis JW. Diagnosis, prevention, and management of
patients receiving total parenteral nutrition. Nutrition 2002;18:32-4. catheter related bloodstream infection during long term parenteral
39. Lowe NM, Fekete K, Decsi T. Methods of assessment of zinc status in nutrition. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2002;87:F21-4.
humans: a systematic review. Am J Clin Nutr 2009;89:2040S-51S. 63. Kurkchubasche AG, Smith SD, Rowe MI. Catheter sepsis in short-
40. Hooper L, Ashton K, Harvey LJ, et al. Assessing potential biomarkers bowel syndrome. Arch Surg 1992;127:21-4; discussion 24-5.
of micronutrient status by using a systematic review methodology: 64. Terra RM, Plopper C, Waitzberg DL, et al. Remaining small bowel
methods. Am J Clin Nutr 2009;89:1953S-9S. length: association with catheter sepsis in patients receiving home total
41. Harvey LJ, Ashton K, Hooper L, et al. Methods of assessment of parenteral nutrition: evidence of bacterial translocation. World J Surg
copper status in humans: a systematic review. Am J Clin Nutr 2009; 2000;24:1537-41.
89:2009S-24S. 65. Piedra PA, Dryja DM, LaScolea LJ Jr. Incidence of catheter-associated
42. Ashton K, Hooper L, Harvey LJ, et al. Methods of assessment of gram-negative bacteremia in children with short bowel syndrome.
selenium status in humans: a systematic review. Am J Clin Nutr J Clin Microbiol 1989;27:1317-19.
2009;89:2025S-39S. 66. Moukarzel AA, Haddad I, Ament ME, et al. 230 patient years of
43. Ristic-Medic D, Piskackova Z, Hooper L, et al. Methods of assessment experience with home long-term parenteral nutrition in childhood:
of iodine status in humans: a systematic review. Am J Clin Nutr natural history and life of central venous catheters. J Pediatr Surg
2009;89:2052S-69S. 1994;29:1323-7.
44. Duro D, Jaksic T, Duggan C. Multiple micronutrient deficiencies in a 67. Rodrigues AF, van Mourik ID, Sharif K, et al. Management of end-
child with short bowel syndrome and normal somatic growth. J Pediatr stage central venous access in children referred for possible small
Gastroenterol Nutr 2008;46:461-4. bowel transplantation. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2006;42:427-33.
45. Leonberg BL, Chuang E, Eicher P, et al. Long-term growth and 68. Zambrano E, El-Hennawy M, Ehrenkranz RA, et al. Total parenteral
development in children after home parenteral nutrition. J Pediatr nutrition induced liver pathology: an autopsy series of 24 newborn
1998;132:461-6. cases. Pediatr Dev Pathol 2004;7:425-32.
Soden Assessment of a Child With Intestinal Failure 19
69. Duro D, Duggan C, Valim C, et al. Novel intravenous (13)C-methio- children with short bowel syndrome after discontinuation of parental
nine breath test as a measure of liver function in children with short nutrition. J Pediatr 1998;132:516-9.
bowel syndrome. J Pediatr Surg 2009;44:236-40; discussion 240. 73. Petersen C. D-lactic acidosis. Nutr Clin Pract 2005;20:634-45.
70. Guha IN, Rosenberg WM. Noninvasive assessment of liver fibrosis: 74. Taylor SF, Sondheimer JM, Sokol RJ, et al. Noninfectious colitis
serum markers, imaging, and other modalities. Clin Liver Dis 2008; associated with short gut syndrome in infants. J Pediatr 1991;119:
12:883-900, x. 24-8.
71. Manning DS, Afdhal NH. Diagnosis and quantitation of fibrosis. 75. Sondheimer JM, Sokol RJ, Narkewicz MR, et al. Anastomotic ulcer-
Gastroenterology 2008;134:1670-81. ation: a late complication of ileocolonic anastomosis. J Pediatr 1995;
72. Dellert SF, Farrell MK, Specker BL, et al. Bone mineral content in 127:225-30.