Bake Furnace
Bake Furnace
Abstract
ALUMAR has three open top ring type anode bake fumaces, one
Consorcio de Aluminio do Maranhao (ALUMAR) is one of the of them being shut down at the time. Fumace I consists of 76 and
largest aluminium smelters of Latin America producing 440'000 fumace 2 of 68 sections, both with 8 pits to sized for 2 layers of 5
tons ofprimary metal. The plan to increase the line current to 228 anodes [2]. On both fumaces 3 fires have been in operation.
kA in all pots and to increase the anode cycle time from 26 to 28 Figure I shows the typical configuration of the firing equipment
days required a fundamental optimization ofthe baking process. prior to the optirnization work.
R&D Carbon was chosen as a technical partner to optimize the The reduction of the anode cycle time in the pots caused an
fumace operation with the goal to increase the production immediate increase in anode demand. In order to produce
capacity and to further improve the baked anode quality to the sufficient anodes for the new demand, the bake fumace had to
required level. reduce the fire cycle from 22 to 19.5 h. The new fire cycle was
very short and caused operational problems in terms of process
This paper describes the measures taken, namely the changeover control, emissions and quality distribution of the anodes. To
from three to four fires and the systematic optimization of the minimize the deterioration of the properties, ALUMAR has
baking parameters. The positive effect of these measures is adjusted the final baking temperature from 1225 to 1250°C and
demonstrated with improved production and quality figures. increased the soaking time from 90 to 96 h.
The combination described above has led to very thin butts which
started to create operational problems in the potroom. The anode
cycle time was then reduced frorn 28 to 26 days.
Process Optimization
Changes Required to Achleve Targets
Implementation ofNew Fire
The increase of the line current and increase of the anode cycle
time in the pots are two contradicting developments, as norrnally The original arrangement of the firing equipment in furnace I
the cycle time would be lowered to compensate the greater anode required 21 sections per fire (as shown in figure I) and 3 to 4
consumption. In order to nevertheless achieve the ambitious sections were reserved for maintenance. In order to add a fourth
targets, combined measures were required in different areas of the fire, the configuration was reduced to 17 sections per fire which
anode production: allowed to keep 4 sections for maintenance after every second
fire. The reduction of 4 sections per fire required fundamentaI
Increase ofthe baked anode weight: changes in the baking philosophy. The new configuration is
As the anode length and width could not be changed, an shown in figure 2.
increase of the anode heigbt and density are the only
two measures to raise the anode weight. The maximum The reduction of 8 to 6 cooling sections was realized by
anode height can be increased by minimizing the readjusting the cooling arrangement which increased the cooling
variation of the anode height. The anode density can be efficiency and moved the zero-point to the desired location.
improved with a process optimization in the paste plant
[3] and in the bake fumace. The newly gained capacity ofthe fourth fire was partially utilized
Reduction of the net anode consumption: to increase the fire cycle from 19.5 to 24 h. This allowed to reduce
The minimum acceptable butts weight at ALUMAR is the baking zone from 5 to 4 burner bridges, by keeping the firing
240 kg. As the maximum anode height is limited, it is time constant at 96 h.
mandatory to reduce the net consumption, in order to
respect the critica] butts weight. The net consumption The section gained from the baking zone was used to increase the
can be reduced by optimizing the key anode properties pre-hearing zone from 2 to 3 sections.
that influence the buming behaviour, namely the CO2
and air reactivity, thermal conductivity and air An additional section was made available by optimizing the
permeability [4]. With the exception of the air refractory maintenance time.
permeability, these properties are rnainly influenced by
the baking process. Optimization of the final baking In order to adjust the baking curve and firing settings to the new
temperature and minimization of the variations in the situation, a systematic optimization was executed instead of a trial
pits are hence targets. and error approach. The methodology of the optimization is
outlined hereafter.
LOADING PRE-HEATlNG COOUNG ZONE
Methodology to Assess and Optimize the Oistribution of the baked under weil controlled condinons in a laboratory furnace to a
Thermal Treatment in the Bake Furnace final temperature of 1050, 1150 and 1250°C respectively with a
soaking time of 20 h, see figure 4. Three sample cores of 50 mm
The optimum baking temperature is a characteristic parameter that
diameter were driLled from each pilot electrode for subsequent
depends on numerous variables such as anode raw material
testing for key properties.
properties, characteristics of the green anode, design and
condition of the bake fumace, capability of the firing system and
limitations of emissions. The determination of the optimum
baking temperature is hence not straightforward and very
individual depending on the plant conditions. The final baking
temperature is not a criteria for the anode performance in the pots,
but rather the combination ofthe relevant anode properties. For an
optimization of the bake furnace operating parameters it is hence
essential to know the actual distribution of anode properties.
Oensity In Xylene [kg/dm') AIr Reactlvlty Oust ["10) Final Baking Temperature
2120 ~--~~--~----~----~ 8.0 The optimization measures resulted in a substantial reduction of
the maximum temperature difference within the pit from 215 to
2.105 t--"""'-I::---+--h~---1 6.0 112°C. Pit regions with temperatures lower than 1080°C could be
eliminated completely (see figure 7).
2.090 t---t-----''"'!oo.;;;;;''''--t-----1
4.0
2060
2.0
0.0
Before
Optimization ra ;--
a
r-
a
1050 1100 1150 1200 1250
Flnal Baklng Temperature [OC]
1250·C a a a
'--
-
- '----
Figure 5. Influence ofthe final baking temperature on anode
properties
1200·C a ~
f1~ë
1150·C I
Results I'"-.
-
a 11"" b,..
a ~
Baking Curve 1100·C
The implementation ofthe fourth fire and subsequent optimization
of the entire baking process resulted in a great increase of the tota!
1050·C
ra -
a ~
hearing time from 135 to 168 h, as shown in figure 6. This
allowed to reduce the final flue gas temperature from 1250 to
1225°C. Fuel consumption savings could be observed after this
reduction.
1000·C
'--
a -
a a
'--
r-- -
950·C a a
Temperature rC)
1400.-----~---- __--_,----_,r--r----_.
l<pc re
1200
After
Optimization ~ c
a
-
1000
800 ~--+-,~>-__;;I~_---i--+- -Old Curve
Figure 7. Final baking temperature distribution of anodes in the
600 ~ -New Curve pits before and after the optirnization
400 ~ t .. The elimination ofhot spots of up to 1250°C is beneficia! for the
200 +- ~f---+--t---
life of the refractory material, as weil as to avoid desulfurization
O+--r--~~~--T-~--r-~~~ effects that are deleterious for the anode quality and off-gas
o ~ ~ ~ ~ 1001~1~1W1~200 emissions.
Time(h)
Anode Ouality
Figure 6. Target baking curve before and after the optimization
Table I shows the anode properties before and after the bake
Heat-up Rate fumace optimization work.
With an unchanged green density level, the baked density has The baked anode weight could be increased by 10 kg as a result of
improved as a result of minimized desulfurization occurring less sulfur and nitrogen losses during baking.
previously during baking. The slower heat-up rate and the lower
pit temperature difference resulted in a better consistency of the
specific electrical resistance and flexural strength. The air Butts Recycling and Carbon Consumption
reactivity residue was also improved as the micro-porosity
A significant improvement of the net anode consumption was
resulting frorn the desulfurization has been minimized.
observed in the potroom and therefore the butts weight increased
remarkably, as shown in Table 11.
Before
Optimization
The increase ofthe butts recycling by 10 % rel. was beneficial for
the anode weight as weil as for the air permeability. With the
70.0% better air permeability and reactivity levels an improvement ofthe
net anode consumption of JO kgC/tA1 could be achieved. As 30 kg
of carbon is consumed per day and anode, the bake furnace
67.5% optimization was a major step towards the goal of increasing the
anode cycle time back to 28 days.
65.0%
After
0
Optimization ~ -
Figure 8. Distribution of the air reactivity residue before and after
the optimization
References
I. Markus W. Meier, Rayrnond C. Perruchoud, Wemer K.
Fischer, "Production and Performance of Slotted
Anodes", Light Metals 2007
2. Paulo Miotto, Marcos Aurelio Silva, Ciro Kato, Roberlito
Silva, "New Method to Start Up Fires in Baking
Fumaces", Light Metals 2005, 683 - 688
3. Raja J. Akhtar, Markus W. Meier et al, "Dynamic Process
Optimization in Paste Plant", Light Metals 2006, 571 -
575
4. Wemer K. Fischer, Felix Keiler and Raymond
Perruchoud, "Interdependence Between Anode Net
Consumption and Pot Design, Pot Operating Parameters
and Anode Properties", Light Metals 1991,681 - 686
5. L.P. Lossius, I. Holden and H. Linga, "The Equivalent
Temperature Method for Measuring the Baking Level of
Anodes", Light Metals 2006, 609 - 608
6. M. Meier, T. Mueller, "Influence of Anode Quality on
Aluminium Production Cost", 3rd Rodding Conference,
lceland, 2005