ANA Selecting An Org Structure For Marketing
ANA Selecting An Org Structure For Marketing
ORG STRUCTURE
FOR MARKETING
HOW-TO GUIDE
Selecting an Org Structure for Marketing
HOW-TO GUIDE
Does your marketing department have a solid infrastructure? Do all of your company’s marketing
professionals understand their role/function in the organization? Is the chain of command easily
understood or only loosely communicated to marketing staff?
Organizational (org) structures provide a framework within a company that ensures all employees
are aware of their role and how they fit into the ecosystem of the business. Org structures present
themselves on a spectrum anywhere from a traditional, top-down approach to more collaborative,
flexible approaches.
Org structures vary by company size, industry, and business needs. Ideally, each company will
create its structure based on their specific requirements, and continue to update the org structure
as changes occur, both internally and externally.
As marketing departments become more complex, with new technologies and initiatives appearing
all the time, it is important that Marketing builds and maintains an org structure that will enhance
their current and future plans.
This How-To Guide was designed to help you understand what the common org charts look like,
the pros and cons of each structure, and how to select the best org structure for your company.
The five figures reviewed in this section do not show the entirety of each structure; however, they
do provide a glance at how each structure is arranged.
FIGURE 1
Centralized Org Structure
CMO
Director, Event
Marketing
FIGURE 2
Marketing Services Org Structure
CEO
FIGURE 4
Decentralized Org Structure
CEO
VP, Marketing Strat. and VP, Marketing Strat. and VP, Marketing Strat. and
Programs - BU A Programs - BU B Programs - BU C
Event Marketing
Manager
Creative Services
Manager
Org.
Description Pros Cons
Structure
Provides an easily
Is the top-down
deciphered chain Can create
approach traditionally
of command; challenges with
used by mid-sized to
Enables highly communication
large organizations.
Figure 1 Centralized specialized job and adjustments
It relies on a singular,
functions; Allows to market changes
centralized marketing
for continued if all departments
department that reports
growth as a are silo'ed.
directly to the CMO/CEO.
company expands.
Provides a
Is similar to the Trad-
"command center"
itional model; however,
for Marketing
the origanization is Can cause serious
strategy that is
structured by Business communication
filtered down
Unit (BU). Business Units loss and transfer
to each BU,
can be based on product of knowledge;
which maintains
division, market segment, Can provide
some level of
Center of or geographic location. In each BU with too
Figure 3 consistency
Excellence this model, the corpora- much autonomy
across the
tion (as a whole) main- and a chance
entire company;
tains the strategy portion to stray from
Empowers each
of Marketing, but the the company's
BU to market its
individual BU manages overarching
product or its
and monitors the unique strategic goals.
segment on their
programs and budget of
own with their
Marketing.
unique knowledge.
Allows each BU
to utilize their Creates a great
knowledge of the deal of autonomy
Each Business Unit
specific division, for each BU; Can
(BU) is responsible for
market segment, cause an overlap
Marketing in its entirety.
Figure 4 Decentralized or location to in work if similar
Marketing strategy and
drive collateral job roles are
programs are run by
and marketing implemented to
each BU.
programs that each BU to do
increase sales similar programs.
opps and closes.
Is a more organic
organizational structure.
It still provides a loose
chain of command with
the executive/leader at
the center; however, the Allows a free flow Employees may
ideology is that the exec/ of knowledge and have a hard time
leader will "radiate" their ideas throughout deciphering
vision and knowledge the organization; their place in the
Figure 5 Circular
throughout the Encourages organization;
department. There are constant immediate chain of
bands for each job level communication command can be
that indicate different and collaboration. difficult to maintain.
levels of knowledge
transfer and functionality.
This model is typically
seen in SMBs or start-up
companies.
Consider the following items when implementing an org structure or restructuring your company:
Chain of Command
The chain of command indicates exactly how an organization is structured from the top of the
organization (i.e. CEO) all the way down to the bottom. A chain of command can be long (i.e. CEO
to SVP to Director to Manager to Specialist) or short (i.e. CEO to Manager). It can also be rigid (see
Figure 1) or loose (see Figure 5).
SMB: The majority of small to mid-sized businesses will most likely see a short chain of command
since there will be less employees than the standard Enterprise. SMBs should consider the
benefits of both rigid and loose chains of command. A loose structure provides more flexibility
with communication, reporting, and adding new roles. A more rigid structure will provide a
solid backbone if your company is gearing up for rapid growth.
Enterprise: Large corporations will typically have long chains of command as there tend to be
more responsibilities that need to be covered. The majority of Enterprises will prefer a more
rigid structure as well to ensure all employees are aware of their direct reports.
Centralization
In order to determine how centralized your org structure needs to be, you will first need to under-
stand where the decision-making power lies. A centralized org structure (Figure 1) indicates a main
source of decision-making power, while a decentralized org structure (Figure 4) suggests that the
decision-making power is spread out through different parts of the organization.
Figures 2 and 3 show a combination of the two, with parts of Marketing being shared between
a “command center” and other parts of the organization. Both SMBs and Enterprises may fall
anywhere on the spectrum based on the number of business units required, the number of depart-
ments needed, and/or the specialization/formalization of job roles.
Single Product/Market/Location: Organizations that do not handle more than one of these
should not concern themselves with this characteristic unless new products, markets, or
geographic locations emerge.
Multiple Products/Markets/Locations: Companies that handle more than one of these should
consider Figure 2, Figure 3, and Figure 4 from the previous section. Each of these structures
have their merits, and help multi-faceted organizations divide up responsibilities and know-
ledge in order to properly serve all customers.
As your company grows, encounters internal changes, and/or sees developments in the market-
place, you will need to re-evaluate your org structure to supplement business needs. An organ-
ization’s marketing infrastructure can help or hinder business development, sales success, and
customer engagement.
Bottom Line
Organizational structures are a critical asset of any company. They promote an understanding of job
role/function, a guide for how information should disseminated through the company and a frame-
work for responsibility and reporting.
Marketing departments are no exception to the need for an org structure. In fact, as more tech-
nologies and programs are introduced into the marketing space, it is imperative that Marketing
considers how their functions are arranged and managed. CEOs, CMOs and marketing leaders
should review the specific requirements of their businesses in order to properly structure the
marketing function for productivity and growth.
Share Your
4 Organizational
Plans
Review Org
Plan the Adaptations
1 Charts In
or Rebuild of Your
Figures 1 To 5
Infrastructure
Share Your
4 Organizational
Plans
Review Org
Use the Modern Marketing
1 Charts In
Department Structure Here
Figures 1 To 5
Review Org
Set Responsibilities
1 Charts In
with Clear Plans and
Figures 1 To 5
Communication
Arrange Or
2 Rebuild?
Share your organizational
plans with key executives
and begin to disseminate
roles, functions, and
responsibilities through your
new channels of leadership
Build Your New
3 Org Chart
and communication.
Share Your
4 Organizational
Plans
Our analysts identify best practices from fast-growing companies and build
Playbooks & Toolkits, Guides & Reports, Training Courses, and Project
Templates to help you optimize your processes, add structure to your depart-
ment, and get your team punching above their weight class.
Manage your work visually with our easy-to-use platform, built for small
marketing teams by design. See what your team is working on at a glance
so you can spend less time managing projects and more time knocking
stuff off your list.
Through strategic partnerships with the AMA, ANA, and AIPMM, our
1,000+ time-saving tools & resources have become the industry standard.
Don’t start from scratch!
LEARN MORE