Chapter 1
INTRODUCTION
Background of the study
Mathematics achievement of students within the United State (US) has
recently been under scrutiny. Student proficiency in mathematics is a concern
among educators and educational stakeholders in the US based on scores from
mathematics assessments (TIMSS, 2007). Students in the US continue to
perform lower than students in many other industrialized nations on
assessments of mathematics achievement (i.e., NMAP, 2008). Statistics from
international assessments and reports suggest students from the US lack the
skills to compete in an international arena, especially in fields requiring
proficiency in mathematics (TIMSS, 2007;NMAP, 2008). Arguably, in order to
advance in mathematics ranking at an international level, researchers,
politicians, and educators must first address mathematics performance of
students at state and local levels.
Meanwhile in the Philippines despite the many changes to the
curriculum, the goals of mathematics education at the basic education level
remain more or less the same: “to provide opportunities for individuals to
develop skills and attitudes needed for effective participation in everyday living
and prepare them for further education and the world of work so that they make
worthwhile contributions to the society at large” (Pascua, 1993). Mathematics,
as we see it, has the following roles in Philippine Education: facilitating
participation in productive life activities, providing a way of making sense of the
world, serving as a means of communication and operating as a gateway to
national progress.
In 2001, with the passing of the No Child Left Behind (NCLB) act schools
were forced to incorporate data driven models of instruction to all students
based on their individual needs and show student growth as measured by state
assessments (Lembke, Hampton, and Beyers, 2012). Shortly after NCLB, the
Individuals with Disabilities Act of 2004 connected and described how NCLB
applied to students with special needs.
School Background
A part of the vision of the Department of Education is to continuously
improve itself to better serve its stakeholders. From traditional way to more
effective teaching strategies and approach, and every possible means were
used by the institution just to improve the performance of the students.
However, despite the dream of the Filipinos to enhance the curriculum; the
students still fail to achieve the competencies in the curriculum guide.
At the District and school level, an alarming decline of the MPS in
Mathematics in the National Achievement Test were reported annually,
although the pupils that were tested for the NAT were grade 7 students it cannot
be denied that considerable percentage of these pupils were from San Isidro
Elementary School. A low mean percentage score in NAT exam indicates that
students have low performance and retention level in Mathematics. One factor
that may affect the performance of the students is on how the teacher provides
meaningful representations and situations to the students. According to Cooper
(2012) in teaching and learning with CPA approach there is manipulative
aspects which are said to be a source of benefits and pitfalls at the same time,
the benefits of learning with the use of manipulative objects will enhance the
students' dispositions and attitudes towards learning in the classroom. The trap
when students prefer to regard the use of manipulative objects as play events
to fill the spare time than to provide an opportunity to improve their
understanding of mathematics.
Equally important with literacy, numerical literacy is an essential life skill
that a functional individual must obtain. However, double the amount of struggle
was observe in obtaining numerical literacy, as it both requires reading and
analytical skills. Proficiency in mathematics has grown as a concern among
educators, parents, policy makers, and researchers. The need for improved
student performance in mathematics, coupled with the substantial
body of evidence to support the use of CRA to teach mathematical
concepts, and the exceptional needs of struggling learners at risk of
mathematics failure would suggest that more studies regarding the use of CRA
instruction in mathematics for struggling learners, especially students who have
struggles in learning math would be available.
However, few studies specifically target this instructional strategy as a
means to support learning of prerequisite skills to algebra, such as fractions,
for middle school students with deficits in mathematics. The small number of
articles located suggests a need for quality research to be conducted in this
area.
Empirical research documenting results of interventions aimed at
improving student performance in mathematics is essential to improve the
quality of instruction that students receive, which ultimately impacts student
achievement. Individual research initiatives are important components that
build a collective body of evidence of how to best instruct students. The study
derives from the awareness of need for student proficiency in mathematics,
while considering the learning challenges experienced by students who
struggle with mathematics and are at risk for mathematics failure.
The result of most recent numerical literacy test done at San Isidro
Elementary School showed that 42% or 175 of the 426 Grade 4 pupils gained
scores of below mastery level, while 39 The need for improved student
performance in mathematics is very critical.
A diagnostic test was given to the Grade four pupils of San Isidro
Elementary, the purpose the test was to measure level the numerical literacy
and skills in number concept. The result showed that 42% or 175 of the 426
Grade 4 gained scores below mastery level, 39% or 169 of the 426 pupils
gained the scores nearing mastery level and only 19% or 81 of the 426 grade
four pupils manage to obtain the scores at the mastery level. Mathematics is
seen as “an essential tool for intelligent participation in a technological society”
(FAPE, 1988). As the level of mathematics needed in the workplace continues
to increase, its study is indispensable in order to develop a “scientifically and
technologically literate citizenry” (UP NISMED, 2001).
Thus, a call for a tailored fit intervention program is very critical. The
need to evaluate the effectiveness of the prevailing math intervention program
is a must. The need for improved student performance in mathematics, coupled
with the substantial body of evidence to support the use of CPA to teach
mathematical concepts, and the exceptional needs of struggling learners at risk
of mathematics failure would suggest that more studies regarding the use of
CPA instruction in mathematics for struggling learners, especially students who
are at risk of failing the math subject would be accessible.
To solve the lack of ability in mathematics representative of the student,
NCTM (2000) suggested to student to be given opportunity to use several
mathematics representatives to solve problems with physical model, social and
mathematics phenomena. One of the learning and teaching process which has
characteristics that student has opportunity to use representation to solve the
mathematical problem is CPA teaching and learning approach. The CPA
approach consist of three steps specifically: 1) learning by physical
manipulation of concrete objects, 2) learning by representation of pictorial of
concrete manipulation, and 3) solve the problem by mean an abstract notation
(Witzell, 2005). Concrete components including manipulative objects such as
cake, measurement tools, or the other object can be used during learning and
teaching process. Pictorial representation is ability to create, read and graph or
picture interpretation. The utilization of abstract notation is referring on symbolic
representation such as number (numeral) or letters that written or interpreted
when solve the problem (Sousa, 2007). Sequence of learning activities carried
out inthe CPA is very important. Activities with concrete material should take
precedence to give the impression that mathematical operations can be used
to solve real-world problems. Pictorial representation shows a visual
representation of the manipulation of concrete help visualize mathematical
operations in problem solving. This is important for the teacher to explain how
the sample image relates to concrete objects. Then, a formal working with
symbols are used to show how symbols providea shorter way and efficient to
represent numerical operations. In the end, students need to achieve the
highest level of abstract that is proficient in use of symbols with a lot of
mathematical abilities they control.
What is Concrete-Pictorial-Abstract approach?
The theories of instruction proposed by Bruner in his 1966 book Toward
a Theory of Instruction have undoubtedly bequeathed a rich legacy to
generations of educators in the domain of learning and instruction. Amongst
his voluminous contributions, one of the most well-known conception is that of
“enactive-iconic-symbolic” modes of representation. This conception forms the
foundation for a spectrum of instructional practices related to mathematics
education, all bearing a conspicuous tripartite semblance to the Bruner’s model.
One such adaptation of Bruner’s model is the Concrete-Representation
Abstract (CRA) sequence. The CRA sequence has been shown to be
particularly effective with students who have difficulties with mathematics
(Jordan, Miller, & Mercer, 1998; Sousa, 2008).
The ‘Concrete’ segment of CRA, in particular, has been the theoretical basis
for the use of manipulatives in learning mathematics (Reisman, 1982; Ross &
Kurtz, 1993). The CRA approach has also been employed to aid students with
learning disabilities to learn mathematics; CRA has been reported to be
effective in remediating deficits in basic mathematics computation (Morin &
Miller, 1998), in the teaching of place value (Peterson, Mercer, & O’Shea,
1998), fractions (Butler, Miller, Crehan, Babbit, & Pierce, 2003) and algebra
(Maccinni & Ruhl, 2000; Witzel, Mercer, & Miller, 2003). With regards to
mathematics students (first and third graders), Fuchs, Fuchs, and Hollenback
(2007) also advocate the use of the CRA sequence to teach place value,
geometry, and fractions.
In the practice of mathematics instruction in Singapore, Bruner’s
enactive iconic-symbolic conception is at the heart of the Concrete-Pictorial-
Abstract (CPA) approach. Since its inception in the early 1980’s, the CPA
approach has remained a key instructional strategy advocated by the
Singapore Ministry of Education. This is attested by its regular mention in official
curricular documents, including the latest syllabus for implementation in 2013.
How to Practice CPA Approach
Children (and adults!) can find math difficult because it is abstract. The CPA
approach builds on children’s existing knowledge by introducing abstract
concepts in a concrete and tangible way. It involves moving from concrete
materials, to pictorial representations, to abstract symbols and problems. The
CPA framework is so established in Singapore math teaching that the Ministry
of Education will not approve any teaching materials that do not use the
approach.
Concrete step of CPA
Concrete is the “doing” stage. During this stage, students use concrete objects
to model problems. Unlike traditional math teaching methods where teachers
demonstrate how to solve a problem, the CPA approach brings concepts to life
by allowing children to experience and handle physical (concrete) objects. With
the CPA framework, every abstract concept is first introduced using physical,
interactive concrete materials.
For example, if a problem involves adding pieces of fruit, children can first
handle actual fruit. From there, they can progress to handling abstract counters
or cubes which represent the fruit.
Pictorial step of CPA
Pictorial is the “seeing” stage. Here, visual representations of concrete objects
are used to model problems. This stage encourages children to make a mental
connection between the physical object they just handled and the abstract
pictures, diagrams or models that represent the objects from the problem.
Building or drawing a model makes it easier for children to grasp difficult
abstract concepts (for example, fractions). Simply put, it helps students
visualize abstract problems and make them more accessible.
Abstract step of CPA
Abstract is the “symbolic” stage, where children use abstract symbols to model
problems. Students will not progress to this stage until they have demonstrated
that they have a solid understanding of the concrete and pictorial stages of the
problem. The abstract stage involves the teacher introducing abstract concepts
(for example, mathematical symbols). Children are introduced to the concept at
a symbolic level, using only numbers, notation, and mathematical symbols (for
example, +, –, x, /) to indicate addition, multiplication or division.
Making CPA work for you
Although we’ve presented CPA as three distinct stages, a skilled teacher will
go back and forth between each stage to reinforce concepts.
The CPA Primary Series approach encourages teachers to vary the apparatus
that children use in class. For example, students might one day use counters,
another day they might use a ten frame. Likewise, children are encouraged to
represent the day’s math problem in a variety of ways. For example, drawing
an array, a number bond diagram or a bar model.
By systematically varying the apparatus and methods used to solve a problem,
children can craft powerful mental connections between the concrete, pictorial,
and abstract phases.
Related Literature
The book of Corpus and Salandanan (2013) stated that
researchers found out that the most effective approaches resulting in 75
percent and 90 percent retention rate are learning by doing and learning by
teaching others, respectively. This means that students want to be part of their
learning and need to be given a meaningful learning experience on the topic
given to them.
According to Cooper (2012) in teaching and learning with CPA approach
there is manipulative aspects which are said to be a source of benefits and
pitfalls at the same time, the benefits of learning with the use of manipulative
objects will enhance the students' dispositions and attitudes towards learning
in the classroom. The trap when students prefer to regard the use of
manipulative objects as play events to fill the spare time than to provide an
opportunity to improve their understanding of mathematics.
Cooper (2012) describes three stages of learning sequences using CPA
approach, namely: the initial phase involves students physically interact with
the manipulation of concrete objects. The second stage involves working with
a concrete representation of the model, which is usually a pictorial like circles,
dots, counting, or geometric figures. The third stage is abstract stage that
symbolically modeled using the concept of numbers, variables, and other
mathematical symbols.
Flores (2010), describe CPA approach as namely: First, manipulative
objects are used to introduce the conceptual understanding. Second is concrete
level that the learning processes described as follows: The instructor
demonstrates the process/mathematical skills with manipulative objects, the
instructor then guides students to participate in the use of manipulative objects,
giving directions and clues, and the students in dependently using object
manipulation to demonstrate the skills/processes.
Cooper (2012) describes three stages of learning sequences using CPA
approach, namely: the initial phase involves students physically interact with
the manipulation of concrete objects. The second stage involves working with
a concrete representation of the model, which is usually a pictorial like circles,
dots, counting, or geometric figures. The third stage is abstract stage that
symbolically modeled using the concept of numbers, variables, and other
mathematical symbols.
Stages of learning by using CPA approach are also described by Flores
(2010), namely: First, manipulative objects are used to introduce the conceptual
understanding. Second is concrete level that the learning process sis described
as follows: The instructor demonstrates the process/mathematical skills with
manipulative objects, the teacher then guides students to participate in the use
of manipulative objects, giving directions and clues, and the students in
dependently using object manipulation to demonstrate the skills/processes.
Instructional the representational level follows the same steps, but manipulative
objects replaced with a picture and/or painting. After the representational
phase, most of the interventions involving the CPA order give students
strategies that help them to remember the steps in the process of mathematics.
It serves as a transition from the use of drawings or paintings with the use of
only the numbers are abstract phase. During the final phase, the students use
the numbers in solving mathematical tasks, and instruction focuses on fluency.
Lembke et al., 2012; Moors et al., 2010; Elliot, 2008 stated that Schools
need a solid core mathematics program including differentiated instruction,
groupings, and peer tutoring to truly teach to each individual child’s needs.
When the quality core instruction is not sufficient to meet the needs of all
students, smaller groups and more individualized instruction are needed to
remediate.
Significance of the Study
Mathematics is accepted as the partner of Science in improving one’s
knowledge. It plays a great role in any field of knowledge for it solves the
numeric problems that may help in acquiring new set of inventions. It is known
to be the back bone of science. Even the amazing works of engineers,
architects, technologies and in all other fields of knowledge are greatly
associated with the concept of Mathematics. A good foundation in Mathematics
will lead to a greater performance of the students in their advance Mathematics.
Teachers in elementary and secondary schools should ensure strong
foundation in Math to provide more chances of the student to acquire another
set of knowledge for the tertiary level easily, because if the student was not able
to master the basic skills in Math, it will lead to a greater chance of having a low
performance in the tertiary level. Basic skills should be developed and mastered
by the student in early years in school. Otherwise, a negative attitude and
performance will occur.
Most grade level pupils like Mathematics and Science in elementary
grades but they dislike both subjects more in junior and senior high school.
They also stated that of all subjects, Mathematics is the least liked subject. With
the various problems that Mathematics education is facing nowadays,
especially with the performance and attitude of the students towards the
subject, an approach commonly used in Singapore (Yoong, 1999), named
Concrete-Pictorial-Abstract (CPA) approach is the way of teaching that the
researcher explored. The researcher checked how it affects the performance
and attitude of a student towards Mathematics.
Conceptual Framework
Developing the CPA strategy over a unit of lessons allows the gradual
transition between stages to take place more seamlessly. Moreover, given the
diversity among learners, the duration of 4-6 lessons provide the temporal
latitude for different students to transit to the next predominant mode of
representation at points they feel they are ready to. In contrast, ‘forcing’ the
entire CPA progression within, say, a single lesson would not allow each mode
to be developed to a point in which the sense-making takes root and where
intermodal links can be meaningfully established, thus heightening the sense
of failure of the CPA innovation; on the other hand, stretching the CPA
development over a much longer time period beyond a “unit” would render it
unrealistic from the point of view of keeping to the time allocations of the
teaching schedule.
Beginning with unit design is also advantageous from the standpoint of
teacher development. Where feasible, teachers can be involved in the design
process. As such, they do not see themselves as mere ‘end-user’ of the CPA-
base design; rather, through active participation in the crafting of the unit
sequence and instructional materials, they are not only given an opportunity to
develop a more refined interpretation of CPA; they are also able to contribute
to concretizing its use in actual classroom instruction.
There would be two set of groups for study. the experimental group and
controlled group in this study. The experimental group will receive the CPA
approach as a math intervention program, while the controlled group will be
having the conventional math intervention program, both groups will undergo
pre and post examination. The result of the compared pretest and posttest
score will determine the effectiveness of the CPA approach as an intervention
program for math.
Input Process output
Test Scores before Administer pre-test Difference between
the use of the CPA examination the Test Scores of
Approach as a Use the CPA Approach Grade 3 Pupils In
Math
intervention as a Math Mathematics before
Program intervention Program and after the use of
Test Scores after Administer post-test CPA Approach as a
the use of the CPA examination Math intervention
Approach as a
Math Test for the difference Program
intervention between the pretest
Effectiveness of the
Program and post-test scores
CPA Approach as a
Math intervention
Program
FEEDBACK
Statement of the Problem
The main purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of concrete-
pictorial-abstract approach in San Isidro Elementary School and on how it
affects the attitude of the students. Specifically, it aimed to answer the following
questions:
1. What are the attitude of the students when exposed to CPA approach and to
those exposed to non-CPA approach before and after the intervention in terms
of:
a. attitudes toward success in Math;
b. Math anxiety;
c. motivation;
d. usefulness of Math; and
e. confidence in learning Math?
2. What is the level of performance in Mathematics of the students once
exposed to CPA approach and those exposed to non-CPA approach in terms
of:
a. pre-test scores:
b. post-test scores; and
c. retention-test scores?
3. Is there significant difference on students’ attitude as exposed to CPA
approach and those exposed to non-CPA approach?
4. Is there significant difference between the performance of the students
exposed to CPA approach and those exposed to non-CPA approach in terms
of post-test scores
Hypothesis
1. There is no significant difference in the attitude of the students when exposed
to CPA approach and to those exposed to non-CPA approach before and after
the intervention in terms of:
a. attitudes toward success in Math;
b. Math anxiety;
c. motivation;
d. usefulness of Math; and
e. confidence in learning Math?
2. There is no significant difference in the level of performance in Mathematics
of the students once exposed to CPA approach and those exposed to non-CPA
approach in terms of:
a. pre-test scores:
b. post-test scores; and
c. retention-test scores?
3. Is there significant difference on students’ attitude as exposed to CPA
approach and those exposed to non-CPA approach?
4. Is there no significant difference between the performance of the students
exposed to CPA approach and those exposed to non-CPA approach in terms
of post-test scores
Significance of the Study
The benefits of this research are as follows:
1. Theoretically, this study will provide a reference enforce ability and reliability
study of mathematics by CPA approach to the achievement of a mathematical
representation of the pupil's ability.
2. In practice, this research will provide direct benefits to the faculty in
developing the skills to teach mathematics to the pupil of San Isidro Elementary
teacher School. Another direct impact can be felt after the students learn
mathematics with the implementation of the CPA approach, namely increasing
the ability of the student mathematical representation.