Imaging Alzheimer PDF
Imaging Alzheimer PDF
Radiology
315
aiding in detection of subtle changes not
readily apparent on routine images ob-
tained at a single time point. Likewise,
functional imaging modalities that dem-
onstrate physiologic changes in the brain,
Radiology
21  APP mutations 50 Production of total amyloid- peptides stages represent the presymptomatic
or of amyloid- 42 peptides phase of the disease. Further progression
19 Apolipoprotein ⑀4 ⱖ60 Density of amyloid- plaques and leads to stages III and IV, which are char-
polymorphism vascular deposits acterized by severe involvement of the
14 PS-1 mutations 40s and 50s Production of amyloid- 42 peptides
1 PS-2 mutations 50s Production of amyloid- 42 peptides entorhinal region, amygdala, and hip-
pocampal formation. This involvement
Note.—Adapted, with permission, from reference 5. leads to interruption of the limbic loop,
which is responsible for data transfer
back and forth between the neocortex
and the hippocampal formation. In addi-
somy 21 (Down syndrome) and in those severity of dementia (7), whereas the to- tion, there is also involvement of many
who carry susceptibility genes for AD tal density of neurofibrillary tangles does subcortical nuclei with diffuse projec-
have shown that amyloid  protein accu- (8,9). Indeed, some elderly individuals tions to the cortex, among them the cho-
mulation in the cortex is an early invari- without dementia have as much plaque linergic system of the basal forebrain, in-
ant event in AD pathology, sometimes deposition as have those with severe de- cluding the nucleus basalis of Meynert.
occurring decades before symptoms be- mentia. However, the neuritic variety of Patients with disease at these stages may
come apparent (5). Given this evidence, plaque associated with dystrophic axons present with symptoms of mild cognitive
current thinking suggests that AD may and dendrites and reactive glial cells ap- impairment (MCI) or prodromal AD, al-
represent not a single disease entity but pears to be a more specific feature of AD though symptoms may be masked by a
rather a syndrome resulting from differ- than is the neurofibrillary tangle. Fur- high cognitive-reserve capacity. In stage
ent genetic determinants that lead to a thermore, results of a number of in vitro V, there is extension to all major regions
common phenotype with amyloid depo- and in vivo studies have shown amyloid of the cerebral cortex, from association
sition and neuronal degeneration in spe-  protein to be directly toxic to neurons, areas into primary areas. In stage VI, even
cific brain regions (6). leading to phosphorylation of tau pro- the primary sensory areas are severely in-
tein, the principal component of neuro- volved, although the motor area contin-
fibrillary tangles (10). ues to be relatively spared. Stages V and
Neurofibrillary Tangles
VI are generally characterized by severe
Neurofibrillary tangles consist of intra- dementia.
Pathologic Progression
neuronal bundles of paired helical fila-
ments composed of an abnormal micro- The insidious onset and gradual pro-
tubule-associated protein known as tau. gression of symptoms in patients with PATHOLOGIC DIAGNOSIS
Virtually all brains of AD patients con- AD are thought to parallel the progres-
tain neurofibrillary tangles. Unlike the sion of AD-related brain destruction from AD is characterized pathologically by re-
gene for amyloid precursor protein, how- entorhinal cortex to hippocampus to ductions in the number of large cortical
ever, there is no evidence of defects in neocortex (11). In typical cases, there ini- neurons in temporal and frontal cortex
the gene encoding for tau in patients tially is isolated impairment of learning and by the appearance of senile (amy-
with familial forms of AD. In fact, neuro- and short-term memory, without alter- loid) plaques and neurofibrillary tangles
fibrillary tangles, consisting of similar ation in other domains of cognition or (4). In living subjects, only a provisional
forms of modified tau protein, are de- consciousness. This is followed by changes diagnosis of possible or probable AD may
tected in other etiologically distinct dis- in long-term memory, personality, orien- be made, by using clinical, laboratory,
eases such as subacute sclerosing panen- tation, and executive function. After cog- and imaging evidence. Definitive diagno-
cephalitis, Hallervorden-Spatz disease, nitive losses, there are behavioral problems sis of AD is made by means of pathologic
Parkinson dementia complex, and de- (eg, hallucinations, delusions). Finally, there examination of tissue derived from au-
mentia pugilistica. Despite the lack of a is deterioration of language, visuospatial topsy or brain biopsy. For this reason,
direct etiologic connection, the results of skills, and, eventually, motor function, criteria have been created to standardize
numerous studies have demonstrated el- which leads to loss of activities of daily the pathologic diagnosis.
evated levels of tau protein in the cere- living. In the past, the two most extensively
brospinal fluid of patients with AD, com- Three stages in the gradual evolution used pathologic criteria have been the
pared with those levels in age-matched of plaque deposition have been described National Institute on Aging consensus
control subjects. (11). Stage A is characterized by deposi- criteria (1) and the Consortium to Estab-
At present, the molecular and etiologic tion in the basal temporal neocortex, or lish a Registry for Alzheimer’s Disease, or
relationship between plaques and tangles entorhinal cortex. There then is exten- CERAD, criteria (12). The National Insti-
is not fully understood. The bulk of cur- sion through the hippocampal formation tute on Aging criteria are based on sub-
rent data suggests that these two lesions in stage B, eventually leading to deposits ject age and clinical history, taking into
might be formed independently of each in virtually all cortical areas, including account the number of senile plaques per
other. In fact, the distribution and den- the highly myelinated primary areas of high-power microscopy field and the
sity of both diffuse and neuritic senile the neocortex in stage C. presence of neurofibrillary tangles in spe-
plaques have not been consistently There are reported to be six stages in cific regions of the neocortex, hippocam-
shown to correlate with the presence or the evolution of neurofibrillary tangles pus, and subcortical gray matter. The
Volume 226 䡠 Number 2 Neuroimaging and Early Diagnosis of Alzheimer Disease 䡠 317
CERAD criteria use only the presence and
density of neuritic senile plaques in the
neocortex for establishment of the diag-
nosis of AD. The density is classified as
“sparse,” “moderate,” or “severe” and is
then combined with the age of the sub-
Radiology
CLINICAL DIAGNOSIS
Volume 226 䡠 Number 2 Neuroimaging and Early Diagnosis of Alzheimer Disease 䡠 319
that of AD or the dementia associated
with Parkinson disease. Patients typically
present with one of three symptom com-
plexes: detailed visual hallucinations,
Parkinson-like symptoms, or alterations
in alertness and attention (3). Pathologi-
Radiology
Volume 226 䡠 Number 2 Neuroimaging and Early Diagnosis of Alzheimer Disease 䡠 321
termine impairment, and how to deal with
fluctuations in performance.
Genetic Testing
Genetic testing can be performed by
Radiology
ROLE OF STRUCTURAL
NEUROIMAGING
Conventional CT and MR Imaging
Conventional CT and MR imaging are
used routinely in the work-up of patients Figure 8. Coronal T2-weighted fast spin-echo MR images (repetition time msec/echo time msec,
2,700/80) in (a, b) a patient with AD and (c, d) an age-matched control subject. (a, b) The patient
with dementia; however, because of their
with AD has severe bilateral hippocampal atrophy (arrows). Compare this with (c, d) normal
low sensitivity and specificity for the di- hippocampus (arrows) in the control subject. Note that b is a close-up of a, and d is a close-up of
agnosis of AD, they are primarily used as c. (Images courtesy of Daniel P. Barboriak, MD, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC.)
an adjunct to help assess the degree of
atrophy and rule out other causes of de-
mentia such as normal-pressure hydro-
cephalus, vascular dementia, or intracra- aqueductal, cerebellar, or dorsal thalamic images in patients with AD (42,43). Early
nial mass. Currently, there is no reason to changes (eg, alcohol-related dementia) investigators used CT to assess cortical,
support CT over MR in the evaluation of (40). At centers where fast spin-echo cerebellar, and hippocampal atrophy on
patients with dementia, except in cases rather than conventional spin-echo im- transverse images; however, the addition
where MR is contraindicated or not aging is used, T2*-weighted or gradient- of the coronal imaging plane with MR
readily available or affordable. echo imaging may be needed to help assess provided better qualitative assessments
Standard MR pulse sequences at most the degree of iron deposition (eg, parkin- of the hippocampal region (Fig 8). Stud-
centers consist of nonenhanced trans- sonian disorders) (41). T1-weighted and ies in which T1-weighted MR imaging
verse spin-echo T1-weighted imaging to T2-weighted sequences may also be used to was used in evaluation of the anterior
help assess the presence and degree of help assess for the presence of ventricular hippocampus have been particularly use-
generalized (eg, AD) or focal (eg, cerebellar dilatation or intracranial mass. Thin-sec- ful. Data from a study (44) with 222 sub-
degenerative diseases, Pick disease, AD) at- tion (ⱕ3-mm-thick) coronal T1-weighted jects (controls and patients with various
rophy (38,39). Transverse dual-echo long- images obtained in a plane orthogonal to forms of dementia) in which a visual rat-
repetition-time imaging, including proton- the long axis of the hippocampus are use- ing scale was used to assess temporal lobe
density and/or fluid-attenuated inversion- ful for assessment of the degree of medial atrophy suggest that sensitivities and
recovery and T2-weighted imaging, is also temporal lobe and hippocampal atrophy. specificities in the area of 85% may be
used in the assessment for periventricular AD.—Medial temporal lobe atrophy, obtained for patients with AD.
and subcortical white matter hyperintensi- particularly of the amygdala, hippocam- Normal-pressure hydrocephalus.—Normal-
ties; cortical or deep gray matter lacunar pus, and parahippocampal gyrus, can be pressure hydrocephalus, an idiopathic
infarcts (vascular dementia); and peri- seen with higher frequency on structural form of communicating hydrocephalus,
is characterized by holoventricular en- Despite the existence of consistent im- Quantitative Imaging of Atrophy
largement out of proportion to sulcal en- aging findings, it should be noted that
largement. These findings are in contrast the diagnosis of normal-pressure hydro- Quantitative measures of generalized
to the findings of generalized atrophy, cephalus is made primarily on the basis cerebral atrophy were developed for both
where the degree of sulcal and ventricu- of clinical findings. Without a prior sus- CT and MR imaging in an attempt to
lar prominence are concordant. Radionu- pected clinical diagnosis, it is unlikely identify pathologic atrophy in early de-
clide cisternography, demonstrating ac- the diagnosis will be made on the basis of mentia, as distinguished from the atro-
tivity within the ventricular system at 24 imaging results alone. phy of “normal” aging. Such approaches
hours, has been used to help diagnose Vascular dementia.—Vascular dementia, included linear and volumetric CT mea-
normal-pressure hydrocephalus and de- or multiinfarct dementia, is often charac- surements of ventricles and subarach-
termine which patients are more likely to terized by multiple areas of high signal in- noid spaces and MR imaging measure-
respond to shunting (45). MR imaging tensity on T2-weighted, proton-density, or ments of cerebrospinal fluid and gray and
can also be useful in this regard. MR im- fluid-attenuated inversion-recovery MR white matter volumes (54 –56). Unfortu-
ages may show the presence of high sig- images. The high signal intensity may be nately, age-related atrophy in individuals
nal intensity in the periventricular and in white matter, basal ganglia, and/or thal- without dementia also occurs, causing
subcortical white matter on T2-weighted, amus. Focal infarcts or lacunae in strategic substantial overlap between the two
proton-density, or fluid-attenuated in- locations can also be associated with vas- groups and limiting the diagnostic utility
version-recovery images; this high signal cular dementia. Clinical onset of cognitive of such measurements. Subsequent work
intensity has been thought to represent deficits is characterized by a stepwise de- focused on the medial temporal lobes,
transependymal edema. These abnormali- cline, as opposed to the more continuous given that the pathologic substrate of AD
ties may, however, represent small-vessel decline in AD. Periods of abrupt decline is known to affect the hippocampus and
ischemic changes, reflecting the relation- may be followed by stable periods. Patients anatomically related areas such as the en-
ship between normal-pressure hydroceph- typically have cerebrovascular risk factors, torhinal cortex at the earliest stages of
alus and decreased blood flow in the including male sex, smoking, hyperten- the disease. Authors of early studies with
periventricular white matter (46). The pres- sion, and/or diabetes. Clinical characteris- CT who focused on this region applied a
ence of a prominent flow void in the cere- tics such as abrupt onset of symptoms of linear approach to measure medial tem-
bral aqueduct has been shown to correlate memory impairment, emotional lability, poral lobe atrophy (57,58) and a stereo-
well with a positive response to shunting somatic complaints, and focal neurologic logical approach to measure hippocam-
(47). More recently, a number of groups deficits, along with a history of stroke or pal volume (59). However, because of the
have demonstrated increased aqueductal transient ischemic attacks, often guide the small size and uneven shape of the hip-
cerebrospinal fluid flow, as measured with clinician in making a diagnosis of vascular pocampus, as well as considerations of
quantitative cine phase-contrast MR imag- dementia. section thickness, the transverse CT ap-
ing, as a good predictor of response to Modern diagnostic criteria emphasize proach turned out not to be well suited
shunting (48,49). the importance of imaging to support a for volumetric assessment.
Volume 226 䡠 Number 2 Neuroimaging and Early Diagnosis of Alzheimer Disease 䡠 323
Quantitative hippocampal volume anal-
ysis with MR imaging turned out to be
better than that with CT, given the supe-
rior soft-tissue contrast capabilities of MR,
the lack of beam-hardening artifacts, and
Radiology
SPECT Imaging
Radiology
Volume 226 䡠 Number 2 Neuroimaging and Early Diagnosis of Alzheimer Disease 䡠 325
patients with frontotemporal dementia
and 90% of patients with AD were cor-
rectly classified. In another study (75) with
16 patients with frontotemporal dementia,
71 patients with other forms of dementia,
Radiology
Volume 226 䡠 Number 2 Neuroimaging and Early Diagnosis of Alzheimer Disease 䡠 327
Radiology
Figure 14. Transgenic mouse model of AD (tg2576). (a) Section from entorhinal cortex demonstrates in vivo labeling of amyloid plaques.
Fluorescent labeling of plaques is seen after intravenous injection of (trans,trans)-1-bromo-2,5-bis-(3-hydroxycarbonyl-4-hydroxy)styrylbenzene, or
BSB, an amyloid  binding agent that crosses the blood-brain barrier. (Original magnification, ⫻400.) (b) The same section was also immunostained
with amyloid –specific antiserum 2332, as demonstrated in this light microscopy image. (Original magnification, ⫻400.) (c) Digital overlay of a
and b reveals high specificity of BSB plaque labeling. (Original magnification, ⫻400.) (Adapted and reprinted, with permission, from reference 100.)
disease-related functional failure in these MR Perfusion Imaging those of cerebral SPECT, with sensitivities
regions. In a number of other studies, in the 87%–95% range for patients with
Dynamic susceptibility-contrast MR
additional areas of activation outside mild or moderate AD and specificities of
perfusion imaging, a method that uses
those seen in control subjects have been 88%–95% in control subjects (104,107).
rapid T2*-weighted imaging of the brain
demonstrated during performance of the To our knowledge, studies have yet to be
during intravenous injection of a bolus of
same task, indicating compensatory re- performed in patients with various forms
paramagnetic contrast material, is an-
cruitment of additional brain regions and of dementia, patients with MCI, and pre-
functional reallocation of brain resources other functional technique that has been symptomatic patients at genetic risk for
(95–97). used to study patients with dementia. future development of AD.
The majority of PET studies in the mem- This technique enables measurement of
ory impairment population have used FDG several hemodynamic parameters, in-
cluding relative cerebral blood volume, Functional MR Imaging
as a radiolabeled tracer. Most recently, a
new radiolabeled tracer, known as 2-(1- flow, and transit time (101,102). Unlike Functional MR imaging has proved to
{6-[(2-[18F]fluoroethyl)(methyl)amino]- PET perfusion imaging, MR perfusion im- be a powerful research technique to aid
2naphthyl}ethylidene)malononitrile, or aging takes less time to perform (about 1 in identifying regions of brain activated
[18F]FDDNP, has been developed. This minute), involves no radiation exposure, by particular stimuli and tasks. With this
tracer is reported (98) to target the amy- and is readily available on any MR unit technique, regional brain activity is mea-
loid  senile plaques and neurofibrillary capable of echo-planar imaging. sured on the basis of local changes in
tangles in AD. An initial study in an 82- Because this technique is relatively deoxyhemoglobin concentration in re-
year-old woman with pathologically new, only a few studies have been per- sponse to various stimuli and tasks (109).
proved AD showed longer tracer reten- formed in patients with dementia. Nev- In brief, rapid T2*-sensitive imaging, usu-
tion times in the hippocampus, which ertheless, it has been shown that MR per- ally gradient-echo echo-planar imaging,
corresponded to pathologically con- fusion measurements of cerebral blood is performed during presentation of a
firmed areas of plaque and tangle depo- volume closely parallel changes in cere- stimulus or performance of a specific task
sition seen at postmortem examination bral metabolic rate of glucose consump- and during rest periods. A voxel-by-voxel
(98). In a subsequent study with the same tion as determined with PET in patients statistical comparison is then performed
tracer (99), nine patients with AD and with dementia and may be a lower cost with images obtained during the stimu-
seven control subjects demonstrated alternative to PET (103). Harris et al lus/task periods versus those obtained
greater accumulation and slower clear- (104,105) originally reported a 17% aver- during the rest periods, creating a statis-
ance of the probe in brain areas worst age reduction in temporoparietal cerebral tical-activation map that can be “thresh-
affected by plaque and tangle deposition. blood volume, with 88.5% accuracy for olded” and presented as a color overlay
Retention time of the tracer in brain re- correct categorization of 13 patients with on anatomic T1-weighted images. Be-
gions known to be affected by AD is cor- AD and 13 control subjects. Maas et al cause functional MR imaging does not
related with lower memory performance (106) examined 16 patients with proba- use ionizing radiation, it can be applied
scores and is significantly greater in pa- ble AD and 16 control subjects and found repeatedly in the same patients without
tients with AD than in control subjects the technique to be 81% sensitive and risk. Although not currently used in the
(Fig 13). Additional ligands are in the 88% specific. More recently, the sensitiv- routine work-up of patients with mem-
preclinical development phase (100) (Fig ity and specificity of MR perfusion imag- ory disorders, the technique offers con-
14). ing have been shown to be superior to siderable potential in early identification
Supports compensatory-recruitment
Supports compensatory-recruitment
Supports compensatory-recruitment
studies of normal memory. This will be
compensatory-recruitment
tients with memory impairment.
recruitment hypothesis
Functional MR imaging activation pat-
Radiology
Comments
monitor performance
subject responses terns during various memory tasks have
been studied in healthy volunteers. Two
hippocampus
main groups of structures involved in
hypothesis
hypothesis
hypothesis
working memory and secondary memory
include the prefrontal cortex and the me-
dial temporal lobe. Hence, these regions
have been the focus of prior functional
MR imaging studies of normal memory.
In prior functional MR imaging studies
In comparison with controls, AD group and
Greater extent and intensity of activation in
in AD group
regions
group
semantic or phonologic
Auditory, word pair with
decision
naming
with mild AD
mild AD
with AD
subjects
Volume 226 䡠 Number 2 Neuroimaging and Early Diagnosis of Alzheimer Disease 䡠 329
presence of substantial neuronal loss, as
may be seen when clinical manifesta-
tions of memory loss are present, de-
creases in activation may result (117).
Such decreases may be seen only in tasks
that make sufficiently high demands to
Radiology
Diffusion-weighted MR Imaging
Diffusion-weighted MR imaging is a
technique that is sensitive to the micro-
scopic motion of water molecules in tis-
sue. Its primary applications have been in
the evaluation of acute cerebral ischemia.
The technique has also been applied to
the study of patients with AD (150 –152).
Most recently, Kantarci et al (153) stud-
ied various brain regions including the
medial temporal lobes in a group of 19
patients with MCI, 21 with AD, and 55
Figure 16. Multivoxel MR spectroscopic imaging in (a) a 62-year-old healthy volunteer and age-matched control subjects. They used
(b) an 80-year-old patient with AD. Sample spectra are shown from right temporal lobe (bottom an index of mean diffusibility: the appar-
left), left insula (top right) and left thalamus (bottom right). Note the increase in myo-inositol ent diffusion coefficient. Confirming and
(Ino) and choline (Cho) levels and the decrease in NAA level (short arrows in b) in the right expanding on the results of previous
temporal lobe of the patient with AD, compared with those levels in the healthy volunteer,
work, Kantarci et al demonstrated statis-
suggesting the presence of gliosis, increased membrane turnover, and neuronal loss in AD.
(P)Cre ⫽ creatine and phosphocreatine. (Images courtesy of H. Cecil Charles, PhD, Duke Univer- tically significant differences in mean dif-
sity Medical Center, Durham, NC.) fusibility between the AD group and the
control group in a number of brain re-
gions, most notably the hippocampus,
and in temporal, cingulate, and parietal
forms of dementia, with a sensitivity of and only an adjunct to clinical evalua- white matter. Although statistically sig-
82% and a specificity of 64%. However, tion at this time. nificant differences were found only for
lack of specificity in distinguishing AD With regard to patients at risk for AD, the hippocampus, values in the MCI
from other forms of dementia causes MR the results of one study (140) have shown group were between those in the AD
spectroscopy to remain a research tool NAA and myo-inositol metabolite levels group and the control group for all re-
Volume 226 䡠 Number 2 Neuroimaging and Early Diagnosis of Alzheimer Disease 䡠 331
gions studied. The authors postulated determine the utility of other neuroim- Acknowledgments: The authors thank Haris
that pathologic destruction of cell mem- aging modalities in the work-up of the Sair, BS, and Sarah Hart, BS, for their assistance
in preparing tables and figures, and Christine
branes, with subsequent loss of myelin patient with dementia (157). Hulette, MD, for consultation on neuropatho-
and axonal processes due to wallerian de- PET is currently used primarily as an logic criteria.
generation, lessens the restriction of adjunct to clinical diagnosis, especially in
Radiology
water diffusion in the hippocampus and differentiating AD from vascular demen- References
afferent white matter tracts. Such patho- tia and other focal dementias such as 1. Khachaturian ZS. Diagnosis of Alzhei-
logic changes are manifested by an in- frontal lobe dementia. Given the grow- mer’s disease. Arch Neurol 1985; 42:1097–
creased apparent diffusion coefficient in ing evidence, PET will likely come to the 1105.
these regions. The value of diffusion- 2. Carr DB, Goate A, Phil D, Morris JC.
forefront both as a diagnostic tool and as
Current concepts in the pathogenesis of
weighted MR imaging as a diagnostic tool a prognostic tool. This will be especially Alzheimer’s disease. Am J Med 1997;
is still in question, however. Kantarci et true if amyloid imaging becomes stan- 103(suppl 3A):3S–10S.
al found that at a fixed specificity of 80%, dardized and widely available. Reim- 3. Small GW, Rabins PV, Barry PP, et al.
the sensitivity was only 57% for distin- Diagnosis and treatment of Alzheimer
bursement issues remain a problem with
disease and related disorders: consensus
guishing patients with AD from control PET, and it is hoped scientific advances statement of the American Association
subjects by using the hippocampal appar- will be recognized by third-party payers. for Geriatric Psychiatry, the Alzheimer’s
ent diffusion coefficient. For determination of preclinical or early- Association, and the American Geriatrics
Diffusion tensor MR imaging is a Society. JAMA 1997; 278:1363–1371.
stage disease, imaging will play an in- 4. Jellinger K. Morphology of Alzheimer
more advanced application of diffusion- creasingly greater role in the future, espe- disease and related disorders. In: Maurer
weighted imaging; diffusion tensor imag- cially as new agents to delay the onset of K, Riederer P, Beckmann H, eds. Alzhei-
ing enables measurement of the direc- dementia become available. As clinical mer disease: epidemiology, neuropa-
tionality or asymmetry of microscopic thology and clinics. New York, NY:
trial results confirm the efficacy of new Springer-Verlag, 1990; 61–77.
water movement in tissue (154). Such therapeutic agents and as combination 5. Selkoe DJ. Alzheimer’s disease: geno-
asymmetric diffusion, known as anisot- therapies are used, earlier and more accu- types, phenotypes, and treatments. Sci-
ropy, is seen in normal white matter, ow- rate diagnoses will become more crucial. ence 1997; 275:630 –631.
ing to the integrity of white matter tracts 6. Selkoe DJ. The pathophysiology of Alz-
The at-risk patient with MCI may also be heimer’s disease. In: Scinto LFM, Daffner
that preferentially allows diffusion of wa-
considered for treatment options that KR, eds. The early diagnosis of Alzhei-
ter parallel, rather than perpendicular, to
might alter the rate of progression to de- mer’s disease. Totowa, NJ: Humana,
the tracts. Primary applications of this 2000; 83–104.
mentia. No specific neuroimaging proto-
technique are in the evaluation of cere- 7. Greenberg SM, Rebeck GW, Vonsattel JP,
col is recommended in this group at Gomez-Isla T, Hyman BT. Apolipopro-
bral white matter tracts (155). Recently,
present (159), although more sensitive tein E epsilon 4 and cerebral hemor-
the technique has been applied in hu-
functional imaging techniques, as well as rhage associated with amyloid angiopa-
man studies of AD (156). So far, results thy. Ann Neurol 1995; 38:254 –259.
subtraction MR imaging, seem to be log-
demonstrate a statistically significant re- 8. Bierer LM, Hof PR, Purohit DP, et al.
ical candidates. FDG PET has demon- Neocortical neurofibrillary tangles corre-
duction in white matter integrity through-
strated the highest prognostic utility for late with dementia severity in Alzhei-
out the brain, with relative sparing of the
providing a diagnosis of AD 2–3 years mer’s disease. Arch Neurol 1995; 52:81–
motor tracts, reflecting the known patho- 88.
before the full dementia-related symp-
logic and clinical findings in AD. 9. Arriagada PV, Growdon JH, Hedley-
toms manifest (160). The role of SPECT in Whyte ET, Hyman BT. Neurofibrillary
this regard remains less promising. Fur- tangles but not senile plaques parallel
ther longitudinal studies must be devel- duration and severity of Alzheimer’s dis-
PREDICTION AND EARLY ease. Neurology 1992; 42:631–639.
DIAGNOSIS: THE FUTURE oped to examine the predictive power of
10. Geula C. Pathological diagnosis of Alz-
these functional techniques in order to heimer’s disease. In: Scinto LFM, Daffner
For differential diagnosis in the patient determine which patients will ultimately KR, eds. The early diagnosis of Alzhei-
develop AD. Most likely, the answer will mer’s disease. Totowa, NJ: Humana,
with dementia, during the middle or late 2000; 65–82.
stages of the disease the current clinical be a battery of tests that combine func-
11. Braak H, Braak E, Neuropathological
criteria have a high sensitivity and spec- tional and structural imaging with clini- stages of Alzheimer’s disease. In: de Leon
ificity for determination of AD. Thus, the cal, genetic, and other laboratory data MJ, ed. An atlas of Alzheimer’s disease.
(161). New York, NY: Parthenon, 1999; 57–74.
future role of imaging in patients with
The major goals in treating AD cur- 12. Mirra SS, Heyman A, McKeel DW, et al.
dementia at these stages will likely re- Standardization of the neuropathologic
main to help exclude other causes of de- rently are to recognize the disease early in assessment of Alzheimer’s disease. Neu-
mentia. The American Academy of Neu- order to initiate appropriate therapy and rology 1991; 41:479 –486.
rology Quality Standards Subcommittee delay functional and cognitive losses. In 13. Hyman BT, Trojanowski JQ. Consensus
recommendations for the postmortem
recently published evidence-based practice addition, as powerful antiamyloid thera-
diagnosis of Alzheimer disease from the
parameters for the diagnosis, manage- pies are developed, there will be a need to National Institute on Aging and the Re-
ment, and early detection of dementia monitor brain changes and treatment ef- agan Institute Working Group on diag-
(157–159). Current imaging recommen- ficacy at the earliest stages of the disease, nostic criteria for the neuropathological
assessment of Alzheimer disease. J Neu-
dations for the initial evaluation of pa- perhaps even in prodromal patients. It is
ropathol Exp Neurol 1997; 56:1095–
tients with dementia include nonen- hoped that the widespread availability of 1097.
hanced CT or MR imaging; however, newer MR and PET markers will supple- 14. Consensus recommendations for the
because of insufficient data on validity, ment the strengths of the currently avail- postmortem diagnosis of Alzheimer’s
disease: the National Institute on Aging,
no other imaging procedure is recom- able structural and functional imaging
and Reagan Institute Working Group on
mended in these guidelines. The subcom- techniques in helping to achieve these Diagnostic Criteria for the Neuropatho-
mittee recommended further research to goals. logical Assessment of Alzheimer’s Dis-
Comparison of pathological diagnostic nesia and dementia. Annu Rev Psychol 21:1586 –1590.
criteria for Alzheimer disease. Alzheimer 1995; 46:493–523. 47. Bradley WG Jr, Kortman KE, Burgoyne
Dis Assoc Disord 1998; 12:182–189. 31. Petersen RC, Smith GE, Waring SC, B. Flowing cerebrospinal fluid in normal
17. Newell KL, Hyman BT, Growdon JH, Ivnik RJ, Tangalos EG, Kokmen E. Mild and hydrocephalic states: appearance on
Hedley-Whyte ET. Application of the cognitive impairment: clinical charac- MR images. Radiology 1986; 159:611–
National Institute on Aging (NIA)-Rea- terization and outcome. Arch Neurol 616.
gan Institute criteria for the neuropatho- 1999; 56:303–308. 48. Bradley WG Jr, Scalzo D, Queralt J, Nitz
logical diagnosis of Alzheimer disease. 32. Peterson RC. Disorders of memory. In: WN, Atkinson DJ, Wong P. Normal-
J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 1999; 58:1147– Samuels MA, Feske S, eds. Office practice pressure hydrocephalus: evaluation with
1155. of neurology. New York, NY: Churchill cerebrospinal fluid flow measurements
18. Cummings JL, Vinters HV, Cole GM, Livingstone, 1996; 728 –736. at MR imaging. Radiology 1996; 198:523–
Khachaturian ZS. Alzheimer’s disease: 33. Morris JC, Storandt M, McKeel DW Jr, et 529.
etiologies, pathophysiology, cognitive al. Cerebral amyloid deposition and dif- 49. Egeler-Peerdeman SM, Barkhof F, Wal-
reserve, and treatment opportunities. fuse plaques in “normal” aging: evi- chenbach R, Valk J. Cine phase-contrast
Neurology 1998; 51(suppl 1):S2–S17, dence for presymptomatic and very MR imaging in normal pressure hydro-
discussion S65–S67. mild Alzheimer’s disease. Neurology cephalus patients: relation to surgical
19. Larson EB, Edwards JK, O’Meara E, 1996; 46:707–719. outcome. Acta Neurochir Suppl 1998;
Nochlin D, Sumi SM. Neuropathologic 34. Petersen RC. Mild cognitive impair- 71: 340 –342.
diagnostic outcomes from a cohort of ment: transition between aging and Alz- 50. DeCarli C, Murphy DG, Tranh M, et al.
outpatients with suspected dementia. J heimer’s disease. Neurologia 2000; 15: The effect of white matter hyperinten-
Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 1996; 93–101. sity volume on brain structure, cogni-
51(suppl 6):M313–M318. 35. Berg L, Hughes CP, Coben LA, Danziger tive performance, and cerebral metabo-
20. Rasmusson DX, Brandt J, Steele C, He- WL, Martin RL, Knesevich J. Mild senile lism of glucose in 51 healthy adults.
dreen JC, Troncoso JC, Folstein MF. Ac- dementia of Alzheimer type: research di- Neurology 1995; 45:2077–2084.
curacy of clinical diagnosis of Alzheimer agnostic criteria, recruitment, and de- 51. Mirsen TR, Lee DH, Wong CJ, et al. Clin-
disease and clinical features of patients scription of a study population. J Neurol ical correlates of white-matter changes
with non-Alzheimer disease neuropa- Neurosurg Psychiatry 1982; 45:962–968. on magnetic resonance imaging scans of
thology. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord 36. Corder EH, Saunders AM, Strittmatter the brain. Arch Neurol 1991; 48:1015–
1996; 10:180 –188. WJ, et al. Gene dose of apolipoprotein E 1021.
21. McKhann G, Drachman D, Folstein M, type 4 allele and the risk of Alzheimer’s 52. Wahlund LO, Basun H, Almkvist O,
Katzman R, Price D, Stadlan EM. Clinical disease in late onset families. Science Andersson-Lundman G, Julin P, Saaf J.
diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease: report 1993; 261:921–923. White matter hyperintensities in de-
of the NINCDS-ADRDA Work Group un- 37. Mayeux R, Saunders AM, Shea S, et al. mentia: does it matter? Magn Reson Im-
der the auspices of Department of Utility of the apolipoprotein E genotype aging 1994; 12:387–394.
Health and Human Services Task Force in the diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease: 53. Breteler MM, van Swieten JC, Bots ML,
on Alzheimer’s Disease. Neurology Alzheimer’s Disease Centers Consortium et al. Cerebral white matter lesions, vas-
1984; 34:939 –944. on Apolipoprotein E and Alzheimer’s cular risk factors, and cognitive function
22. Diagnostic and statistical manual of Disease. N Engl J Med 1998; 338:506 – in a population-based study: the Rotter-
mental disorders. 4th ed. Washington, 511. dam Study. Neurology 1994; 44:1246 –
DC: American Psychiatric Association, 38. Huang YP, Tuason MY, Wu T, Plaitakis 1252.
1994. A. MRI and CT features of cerebellar de- 54. de Leon MJ, George AE, Reisberg B, et al.
23. Winblad B, Wimo A. Assessing the soci- generation. J Formos Med Assoc 1993; Alzheimer’s disease: longitudinal CT
etal impact of acetylcholinesterase in- 92:494 –508. studies of ventricular change. AJR Am J
hibitor therapies. Alzheimer Dis Assoc 39. Duara R, Barker W, Luis CA. Frontotem- Roentgenol 1989; 152:1257–1262.
Disord 1999; 13(suppl 2):S9 –S19. poral dementia and Alzheimer’s disease: 55. DeCarli C, Kaye JA, Horwitz B, Rapoport
24. Roman GC, Tatemichi TK, Erkinjuntti T, differential diagnosis. Dement Geriatr SI. Critical analysis of the use of com-
et al. Vascular dementia: diagnostic cri- Cogn Disord 1999; 10:37–42. puter-assisted transverse axial tomogra-
teria for research studies: report of the 40. Charness ME. Brain lesions in alcohol- phy to study human brain in aging and
NINDS-AIREN International Workshop. ics. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 1993; 17:2–11. dementia of the Alzheimer type. Neurol-
Neurology 1993; 43:250 –260. 41. Drayer BP. Imaging of the aging brain. ogy 1990; 40:872–883.
25. Adams RD, Victor M, Ropper A. Adams II. Pathologic conditions. Radiology 56. Rusinek H, de Leon MJ, George AE, et al.
& Victor’s principles of neurology. 6th 1988; 166:797–806. Alzheimer disease: measuring loss of ce-
ed. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill, 1996; 42. Seab JP, Jagust WJ, Wong ST, Roos MS, rebral gray matter with MR imaging. Ra-
121. Reed BR, Budinger TF. Quantitative diology 1991; 178:109 –114.
26. Caruso R, Cervoni L, Vitale AM, Salvati NMR measurements of hippocampal at- 57. Doraiswamy PM, McDonald WM,
M. Idiopathic normal-pressure hydro- rophy in Alzheimer’s disease. Magn Re- Patterson L, et al. Interuncal distance as
cephalus in adults: result of shunting son Med 1988; 8:200 –208. a measure of hippocampal atrophy: nor-
correlated with clinical findings in 18 43. Kesslak JP, Nalcioglu O, Cotman CW. mative data on axial MR imaging. AJNR
patients and review of the literature. Quantification of magnetic resonance Am J Neuroradiol 1993; 14:141–143.
Neurosurg Rev 1997; 20:104 –107. scans for hippocampal and parahip- 58. Early B, Escalona PR, Boyko OB, et al.
27. Black PM, Ojemann RG, Tzouras A. CSF pocampal atrophy in Alzheimer’s dis- Interuncal distance measurements in
shunts for dementia, incontinence, and ease. Neurology 1991; 41:51–54. healthy volunteers and in patients with
gait disturbance. Clin Neurosurg 1985; 44. O’Brien JT, Desmond P, Ames D, Alzheimer disease. AJNR Am J Neurora-
32:632–651. Schweitzer I, Chiu E, Tress B. Temporal diol 1993; 14:907–910.
28. McKeith IG, Galasko D, Kosaka K, et al. lobe magnetic resonance imaging can 59. de Leon MJ, George AE, Stylopoulos LA,
Consensus guidelines for the clinical differentiate Alzheimer’s disease from Smith G, Miller DC. Early marker for
and pathologic diagnosis of dementia normal aging, depression, vascular de- Alzheimer’s disease: the atrophic hip-
with Lewy bodies (DLB): report of the mentia and other causes of cognitive im- pocampus. Lancet 1989; 2:672–673.
consortium on DLB international work- pairment. Psychol Med 1997; 27:1267– 60. Jack CR. Structural imaging approaches
shop. Neurology 1996; 47:1113–1124. 1275. to Alzheimer’s disease. In: Daffner S, ed.
29. Snowdon DA, Kemper SJ, Mortimer JA, 45. Hughes CP, Siegel BA, Coxe WS, et al. Early diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease.
Greiner LH, Wekstein DR, Markesbery Adult idiopathic communicating hydro- Totowa, NJ: Humana, 2000.
Volume 226 䡠 Number 2 Neuroimaging and Early Diagnosis of Alzheimer Disease 䡠 333
61. Jack CR Jr, Bentley MD, Twomey CK, ease and subcortical white matter de- 91. Pietrini P, Alexander GE, Furey ML, et al.
Zinsmeister AR. MR imaging–based vol- mentia by an anterior-to-posterior rCBF- Cerebral metabolic response to passive
ume measurements of the hippocampal SPET ratio. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord audiovisual stimulation in patients with
formation and anterior temporal lobe: 2000; 11:275–285. Alzheimer’s disease and healthy volun-
validation studies. Radiology 1990; 176: 76. Talbot PR, Lloyd JJ, Snowden JS, Neary teers assessed by PET. J Nucl Med 2000;
205–209. D, Testa HJ. A clinical role for 99mTc- 41:575–583.
62. Jack CR Jr, Petersen RC, Xu YC, et al. HMPAO SPECT in the investigation of 92. Rapoport SI. Functional brain imaging
Radiology
Medial temporal atrophy on MRI in nor- dementia? J Neurol Neurosurg Psychia- in the resting state and during activation
mal aging and very mild Alzheimer’s dis- try 1998; 64:306 –313. in Alzheimer’s disease: implications for
ease. Neurology 1997; 49:786 –794. 77. Ishii K, Yamaji S, Kitagaki H, Imamura T, disease mechanisms involving oxidative
63. Jack CR Jr, Petersen RC, Xu YC, et al. Hirono N, Mori E. Regional cerebral phosphorylation. Ann N Y Acad Sci
Rate of medial temporal lobe atrophy in blood flow difference between dementia 1999; 893:138 –153.
typical aging and Alzheimer’s disease. with Lewy bodies and AD. Neurology 93. Riddle W, O’Carroll RE, Dougall N, et al.
Neurology 1998; 51:993–999. 1999; 53:413–416. A single photon emission computerised
64. Jack CR Jr, Petersen RC, Xu Y, et al. Rates 78. Lobotesis K, Fenwick JD, Phipps A, et al. tomography study of regional brain
of hippocampal atrophy correlate with Occipital hypoperfusion on SPECT in function underlying verbal memory in
change in clinical status in aging and dementia with Lewy bodies but not AD. patients with Alzheimer-type dementia.
AD. Neurology 2000; 55:484 –489. Neurology 2001; 56:643–649. Br J Psychiatry 1993; 163:166 –172.
65. Killiany RJ, Gomez-Isla T, Moss M, et al. 79. McMahon PM, Araki SS, Neumann PJ, 94. Kessler J, Herholz K, Grond M, Heiss
Use of structural magnetic resonance Harris GJ, Gazelle GS. Cost-effectiveness WD. Impaired metabolic activation in
imaging to predict who will get Alzhei- of functional imaging tests in the diag- Alzheimer’s disease: a PET study during
mer’s disease. Ann Neurol 2000; 47:430 – nosis of Alzheimer disease. Radiology continuous visual recognition. Neuro-
439. 2000; 217:58 –68. psychologia 1991; 29:229 –243.
66. Jack CR Jr, Petersen RC, Xu YC, et al. 80. McKelvey R, Bergman H, Stern J, Rush C, 95. Backman L, Andersson JL, Nyberg L,
Prediction of AD with MRI-based hip- Zahirney G, Chertkow H. Lack of prog- Winblad B, Nordberg A, Almkvist O.
pocampal volume in mild cognitive im- nostic significance of SPECT abnormali- Brain regions associated with episodic
pairment. Neurology 1999; 52:1397– ties in non-demented elderly subjects retrieval in normal aging and Alzhei-
1403. with memory loss. Can J Neurol Sci mer’s disease. Neurology 1999; 52:1861–
67. Fox NC, Crum WR, Scahill RI, Stevens 1999; 26:23–28. 1870.
JM, Janssen JC, Rossor MN. Imaging of 81. Johnson KA, Jones K, Holman BL, et al. 96. Woodard JL, Grafton ST, Votaw JR,
onset and progression of Alzheimer’s Preclinical prediction of Alzheimer’s dis- Green RC, Dobraski ME, Hoffman JM.
disease with voxel-compression map- ease using SPECT. Neurology 1998; 50: Compensatory recruitment of neural re-
ping of serial magnetic resonance im- 1563–1571. sources during overt rehearsal of word
ages. Lancet 2001; 358:201–205. 82. Johnson KA, Lopera F, Jones K, et al. lists in Alzheimer’s disease. Neuropsy-
68. Fox NC, Cousens S, Scahill R, Harvey RJ, Presenilin-1-associated abnormalities in chology 1998; 12:491–504.
Rossor MN. Using serial registered brain regional cerebral perfusion. Neurology 97. Becker JT, Mintun MA, Aleva K, Wise-
magnetic resonance imaging to measure 2001; 56:1545–1551. man MB, Nichols T, DeKosky ST. Com-
disease progression in Alzheimer dis- 83. Devanand DP, Jacobs DM, Tang MX, et pensatory reallocation of brain resources
ease: power calculations and estimates al. The course of psychopathologic fea- supporting verbal episodic memory in
of sample size to detect treatment ef- tures in mild to moderate Alzheimer dis- Alzheimer’s disease. Neurology 1996;
fects. Arch Neurol 2000; 57:339 –344. ease. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1997; 54:257– 46: 692–700.
69. Kelemen A, Szekely G, Gerig G. Elastic 263. 98. Agdeppa ED, Kepe V, Shoghi-Jadid K, et
model-based segmentation of 3-D neu- 84. Salmon E, Sadzot B, Maquet P, et al. al. In vivo and in vitro labeling of
roradiological data sets. IEEE Trans Med Differential diagnosis of Alzheimer’s dis- plaques and tangles in the brain of an
Imaging 1999; 18:828 –839. ease with PET. J Nucl Med 1994; 35:391– Alzheimer’s disease patient: a case study
70. Pickut BA, Dierckx RA, Dobbeleir A, et 398. (abstr). J Nucl Med 2001; 42(suppl 1):
al. Validation of the cerebellum as a ref- 85. Okamura N, Arai H, Higuchi M, et al. 65P.
erence region for SPECT quantification [18F]FDG-PET study in dementia with 99. Shoghi-Jadid K, Small GW, Agdeppa ED,
in patients suffering from dementia of Lewy bodies and Alzheimer’s disease. et al. Localization of neurofibrillary tan-
the Alzheimer type. Psychiatry Res 1999; Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psy- gles and beta-amyloid plaques in the
90:103–112. chiatry 2001; 25:447–456. brains of living patients with Alzheimer
71. Rodriguez G, Vitali P, Calvini P, et al. 86. Minoshima S, Giordani B, Berent S, Frey disease. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry 2002;
Hippocampal perfusion in mild Alzhei- KA, Foster NL, Kuhl DE. Metabolic re- 10:24 –35.
mer’s disease. Psychiatry Res 2000; 100: duction in the posterior cingulate cortex 100. Skovronsky DM, Zhang B, Kung MP,
65–74. in very early Alzheimer’s disease. Ann Kung HF, Trojanowski JQ, Lee VM. In
72. Jobst KA, Barnetson LP, Shepstone BJ. Neurol 1997; 42:85–94. vivo detection of amyloid plaques in a
Accurate prediction of histologically 87. Kennedy AM, Frackowiak RS, Newman mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease.
confirmed Alzheimer’s disease and the SK, et al. Deficits in cerebral glucose me- Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2000; 97:7609 –
differential diagnosis of dementia: the tabolism demonstrated by positron 7614.
use of NINCDS-ADRDA and DSM-III-R emission tomography in individuals at 101. Rosen BR, Belliveau JW, Chien D. Perfu-
criteria, SPECT, x-ray CT, and Apo E4 in risk of familial Alzheimer’s disease. Neu- sion imaging by nuclear magnetic reso-
medial temporal lobe dementias: Oxford rosci Lett 1995; 186:17–20. nance. Magn Reson Q 1989; 5:263–281.
Project to Investigate Memory and Ag- 88. Small GW, Mazziotta JC, Collins MT, et 102. Rempp KA, Brix G, Wenz F, Becker CR,
ing. Int Psychogeriatr 1998; 10:271–302. al. Apolipoprotein E type 4 allele and Guckel F, Lorenz WJ. Quantification of
73. Jagust W, Thisted R, Devous MD Sr, et al. cerebral glucose metabolism in relatives regional cerebral blood flow and volume
SPECT perfusion imaging in the diagno- at risk for familial Alzheimer disease. with dynamic susceptibility contrast-en-
sis of Alzheimer’s disease: a clinical- JAMA 1995; 273:942–947. hanced MR imaging. Radiology 1994;
pathologic study. Neurology 2001; 56: 89. Drzezga A, Lautenschlage YU, Meno- 193: 637–641.
950 –956. shima S, et al. Glucose metabolic change 103. Gonzalez RG, Fischman AJ, Guimaraes
74. Charpentier P, Lavenu I, Defebvre L, et associated with conversion from mild AR, et al. Functional MR in the evalua-
al. Alzheimer’s disease and frontotem- cognitive impairment to Alzheimer’s tion of dementia: correlation of abnor-
poral dementia are differentiated by disease: a follow-up PET study (abstr). mal dynamic cerebral blood volume
discriminant analysis applied to Tc J Nucl Med 2001; 42(suppl 1):60P. measurements with changes in cerebral
HmPAO SPECT data. J Neurol Neurosurg 90. Silverman DH, Small GW, Chang CY, et metabolism on positron emission to-
Psychiatry 2000; 69:661–663. al. Positron emission tomography in mography with fludeoxyglucose F18.
75. Sjogren M, Gustafson L, Wikkelso C, evaluation of dementia: regional brain AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1995; 16:1763–
Wallin A. Frontotemporal dementia can metabolism and long-term outcome. 1770.
be distinguished from Alzheimer’s dis- JAMA 2001; 286:2120 –2127. 104. Harris GJ, Lewis RF, Satlin A, et al. Dy-
namic susceptibility contrast MRI of re- probable Alzheimer’s disease and in cog- 135. Frederick BB, Satlin A, Yurgelun-Todd
gional cerebral blood volume in Alzhei- nitively able elderly volunteers. AJNR DA, Renshaw PF. In vivo proton mag-
mer’s disease. Am J Psychiatry 1996; Am J Neuroradiol 2000; 21:524 –531. netic resonance spectroscopy of Alzhei-
153: 721–724. 121. Saykin AJ, Flashman LA, Frutiger SA, et mer’s disease in the parietal and tempo-
106. Maas LC, Harris GJ, Satlin A, English al. Neuroanatomic substrates of seman- ral lobes. Biol Psychiatry 1997; 42:147–
CD, Lewis RF, Renshaw PF. Regional ce- tic memory impairment in Alzheimer’s 150.
rebral blood volume measured by dy- disease: patterns of functional MRI acti- 136. MacKay S, Ezekiel F, Di Sclafani V, et al.
namic susceptibility contrast MR imag- vation. J Int Neuropsychol Soc 1999; 5: Alzheimer disease and subcortical isch-
ing in Alzheimer’s disease: a principal 377–392. emic vascular dementia: evaluation by
components analysis. J Magn Reson Im- 122. Corkin S, Kennedy AM, Bucci J, et al. combining MR imaging segmentation
aging 1997; 7:215–219. Relation between recognition perfor- and H-1 MR spectroscopic imaging. Ra-
107. Bozzao A, Floris R, Baviera ME, Apruzz- mance and fMRI data in Alzheimer’s dis- diology 1996; 198:537–545.
ese A, Simonetti G. Diffusion and perfu- ease and older normal subjects. Soc 137. Constans JM, Meyerhoff DJ, Gerson J, et
sion MR imaging in cases of Alzheimer’s Neuro 1997; 23:193–195. al. H-1 MR spectroscopic imaging of
disease: correlations with cortical atro- 123. Smith CD, Andersen AH, Kryscio RJ, et white matter signal hyperintensities:
phy and lesion load. AJNR Am J Neuro- al. Altered brain activation in cogni- Alzheimer disease and ischemic vascular
radiol 2001; 22:1030 –1036. tively intact individuals at high risk for dementia. Radiology 1995; 197:517–
108. Ogawa S, Lee TM, Kay AR, Tank DW. Alzheimer’s disease. Neurology 1999; 523.
Brain magnetic resonance imaging with 53: 1391–1396. 138. Ernst T, Chang L, Melchor R, Mehringer
contrast dependent on blood oxygen- 124. Small GW, Ercoli LM, Silverman DH, et CM. Frontotemporal dementia and
ation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1990; al. Cerebral metabolic and cognitive de- early Alzheimer disease: differentiation
87:9868 –9872. cline in persons at genetic risk for Alz- with frontal lobe H-1 MR spectroscopy.
109. Courtney SM, Ungerleider LG, Keil K, heimer’s disease. Proc Natl Acad Sci Radiology 1997; 203:829 –836.
Haxby JV. Transient and sustained activ- U S A 2000; 97:6037–6042. 139. Shonk TK, Moats RA, Gifford P, et al.
ity in a distributed neural system for 125. Doraiswamy PM, Chen JG, Charles HC. Probable Alzheimer disease: diagnosis
human working memory. Nature 1997; Brain magnetic resonance spectroscopy: with proton MR spectroscopy. Radiol-
386:608 –611. role in assessing outcomes in Alzhei- ogy 1995; 195:65–72.
110. Ojemann JG, Buckner RL, Corbetta M, mer’s disease. CNS Drugs 2000; 14:457– 140. Parnetti L, Lowenthal DT, Presciutti O,
et al. H-MRS, MRI-based hippocampal
Raichle ME. Imaging studies of memory 472.
volumetry and Tc-HMPAO-SPECT in
and attention. Neurosurg Clin N Am 126. Chen JG, Charles HC, Barboriak DP, Do-
normal aging, age-associated memory
1997; 8:307–309. raiswamy PM. Magnetic resonance spec-
impairment, and probable Alzheimer’s
111. Gabrieli JD, Poldrack RA, Desmond JE. troscopy in Alzheimer’s disease: focus
disease. J Am Geriatr Soc 1996; 44:133–
The role of left prefrontal cortex in lan- on N-acetylaspartate. Acta Neurol Scand
138.
guage and memory. Proc Natl Acad Sci Suppl 2000; 176:20 –26.
141. Moats RA, Ernst T, Shonk TK, Ross BD.
U S A 1998; 95:906 –913. 127. Lazeyras F, Charles HC, Tupler LA, Erick-
Abnormal cerebral metabolite concen-
112. Wagner AD, Desmond JE, Glover GH, son R, Boyko OB, Krishnan KR. Meta-
trations in patients with probable Alz-
Gabrieli JD. Prefrontal cortex and recog- bolic brain mapping in Alzheimer’s dis-
heimer disease. Magn Reson Med 1994;
nition memory: functional-MRI evi- ease using proton magnetic resonance
32:110 –115.
dence for context-dependent retrieval spectroscopy. Psychiatry Res 1998; 82: 142. Parnetti L, Tarducci R, Presciutti O, et al.
processes. Brain 1998; 121:1985–2002. 95–106. Proton magnetic resonance spectros-
113. Gabrieli JD, Poldrack RA, Desmond JE. 128. Klunk WE, Panchalingam K, Moossy J, copy can differentiate Alzheimer’s dis-
The role of left prefrontal cortex in lan- McClure RJ, Pettegrew JW. –acetyl-L-as- ease from normal aging. Mech Ageing
guage and memory. Proc Natl Acad Sci partate and other amino acid metabo- Dev 1997; 97:9 –14.
U S A 1998; 95:906 –913. lites in Alzheimer’s disease brain: a pre- 143. Kreis R, Ross BD, Farrow NA, Ackerman
114. Buckner RL, Kelley WM, Petersen SE. liminary proton nuclear magnetic Z. Metabolic disorders of the brain in
Frontal cortex contributes to human resonance study. Neurology 1992; 42: chronic hepatic encephalopathy de-
memory formation. Nat Neurosci 1999; 1578 –1585. tected with 1H MR spectroscopy. Radi-
2:311–314. 129. Klunk WE, Panchalingam K, McClure ology 1992; 182:19 –27.
115. Cohen NJ, Ryan J, Hunt C, Romine L, RJ, Stanley JA, Pettegrew JW. Metabolic 144. Haussinger D, Laubenberger J, vom
Wszalek T, Nash C. Hippocampal system alterations in postmortem Alzheimer’s Dahl S, et al. Proton magnetic resonance
and declarative (relational) memory: sum- disease brain are exaggerated by Apo-E4. spectroscopy studies on human brain
marizing the data from functional neuro- Neurobiol Aging 1998; 19:511–515. myo-inositol in hypoosmolarity and he-
imaging studies. Hippocampus 1999; 9: 130. Kwo-On-Yuen PF, Newmark RD, patic encephalopathy. Gastroenterology
83–98. Budinger TF, Kaye JA, Ball MJ, Jagust WJ. 1994; 107:1475–1480.
116. Puce A, Allison T, Gore JC, McCarthy G. Brain N-acetyl-L-aspartic acid in Alzhei- 145. Kreis R, Ross BD. Cerebral metabolic dis-
Face-sensitive regions in human extra- mer’s disease: a proton magnetic reso- turbances in patients with subacute and
striate cortex studied by functional MRI. nance spectroscopy study. Brain Res chronic diabetes mellitus: detection
J Neurophysiol 1995; 74:1192–1199. 1994; 667:167–174. with proton MR spectroscopy. Radiol-
117. Bookheimer SY, Strojwas MH, Cohen 131. Mohanakrishnan P, Fowler AH, Vonsat- ogy 1992; 184:123–130.
MS, et al. Patterns of brain activation in tel JP, et al. An in vitro 1H nuclear mag- 146. Kruse B, Hanefeld F, Christen HJ, et al.
people at risk for Alzheimer’s disease. netic resonance study of the temporopa- Alterations of brain metabolites in meta-
N Engl J Med 2000; 343:450 –456. rietal cortex of Alzheimer brains. Exp chromatic leukodystrophy as detected
118. Small SA, Nava AS, Perera GM, Delapaz Brain Res 1995; 102:503–510. by localized proton magnetic resonance
R, Stern Y. Evaluating the function of 132. Jessen F, Block W, Traber F, et al. Proton spectroscopy in-vivo. J Neurol 1993;
hippocampal subregions with high-res- MR spectroscopy detects a relative de- 241: 68 –74.
olution MRI in Alzheimer’s disease and crease of N-acetylaspartate in the medial 147. Doraiswamy PM, Charles HC, Krishnan
aging. Microsc Res Tech 2000; 51:101– temporal lobe of patients with AD. Neu- KR. Prediction of cognitive decline in
108. rology 2000; 55:684 –688. early Alzheimer’s disease (letter). Lancet
119. Johnson SC, Saykin AJ, Baxter LC, et al. 133. Longo R, Giorgini A, Magnaldi S, Pasca- 1998; 352:1678.
The relationship between fMRI activa- zio L, Ricci C. Alzheimer’s disease histo- 148. Satlin A, Bodick N, Offen WW, Renshaw
tion and cerebral atrophy: comparison logically proven studied by MRI and PF. Brain proton magnetic resonance
Volume 226 䡠 Number 2 Neuroimaging and Early Diagnosis of Alzheimer Disease 䡠 335
spectroscopy (H-MRS) in Alzheimer’s diffusion in cerebral white matter in Alz- Neurology. Neurology 2001; 56:1143–
disease: changes after treatment with heimer’s disease. Gerontology 1997; 43: 1153.
xanomeline, an M1 selective cholinergic 343–351. 158. Doody RS, Stevens JC, Beck C, et al.
agonist. Am J Psychiatry 1997; 154:1459 – 153. Kantarci K, Jack CR, Xu YC, et al. Mild Practice parameter: management of de-
1461. cognitive impairment and Alzheimer mentia (an evidence-based review)—re-
149. Waldman AD, McConnell JR, Rai GS, disease: regional diffusivity of water. Ra- port of the Quality Standards Subcom-
Radiology
Chaudry M, Grant DS, Martin PA. Auto- diology 2001; 219:101–107. mittee of the American Academy of
mated proton MRS of the brain at 1.0 T: 154. Pierpaoli C, Jezzard P, Basser PJ, Barnett Neurology. Neurology 2001; 56:1154 –
reproducibility and clinical utility in A, Di Chiro G. Diffusion tensor MR im- 1166.
Alzheimer’s disease. Presented at the aging of the human brain. Radiology 159. Petersen RC, Stevens JC, Ganguli M,
Sixth Meeting of the International Soci- 1996; 201:637–648. Tangalos EG, Cummings JL, DeKosky
ety for Magnetic Resonance in Medi- 155. Melhem ER, Mori S, Mukundan G, Kraut ST. Practice parameter: early detection
cine, Sydney, Australia, April 18 –24, MA, Pomper MG, van Zijl PC. Diffusion of dementia: mild cognitive impairment
1998. tensor MR imaging of the brain and (an evidence-based review)—report of
150. Sandson TA, Felician O, Edelman RR, white matter tractography. AJR Am J the Quality Standards Subcommittee of
Warach S. Diffusion-weighted magnetic Roentgenol 2002; 178:3–16. the American Academy of Neurology.
resonance imaging in Alzheimer’s dis- 156. Rose SE, Chen F, Chalk JB, et al. Loss of Neurology 2001; 56:1133–1142.
ease. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord 1999; connectivity in Alzheimer’s disease: an 160. Silverman PHS, Chang CY, Cummings
10:166 –171. evaluation of white matter tract integ- JL, et al. Prognostic value of regional
151. Hanyu H, Sakurai H, Iwamoto T, rity with colour coded MR diffusion ten- brain metabolism in evaluation of de-
Takasaki M, Shindo H, Abe K. Diffusion- sor imaging. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychi- mentia (abstr). J Nucl Med 1999;
weighted MR imaging of the hippocam- atry 2000; 69:528 –530. 40(suppl 1):71P.
pus and temporal white matter in Alz- 157. Knopman DS, DeKosky ST, Cummings 161. George AE, Cha S. What role does func-
heimer’s disease. J Neurol Sci 1998; 156: JL, et al. Practice parameter: diagnosis of tional MR imaging play in the diagnosis
195–200. dementia (an evidence-based review)— or prediction of future-onset Alzhei-
152. Hanyu H, Shindo H, Kakizaki D, Abe K, report of the Quality Standards Subcom- mer’s disease? AJNR Am J Neuroradiol
Iwamoto T, Takasaki M. Increased water mittee of the American Academy of 2001; 22:1017–1018.