Transmission Design
Transmission Design
By
FERDINAND O. MAZON
October 2018
PSU VISION
Sustainable Development.”
PSU MISSION
God, I thank you for making this report possible and I also thank my parents for
supporting me in my studies.
the possibility to complete this report. A special gratitude I give to our adviser, Mr.
you for the opportunity to engage in design and for the knowledge I gained that will be
crucial role of my friends in making this report, they helped me and provided the
A. System Interconnection……………………………………………………....1
C. Substation Load………………………………………………………………3
I. Subdivision 1…………………………………………………………………..44-46
II. Subdivision 2………………………………………………………………….47-49
III. Subdivision 3…………………………………………………………………50-52
I. OG Substation…………………………………………………………………. 53-57
II LGD Substation…………………………………………………...................... 58-62
Drawings………………………………………………………………….....114-117
1
A. System Interconnection
IZANAMI HPP
IZANAGI NPP AMATERASU HPP
OG S/S
2
C. Substation Loads
Assuming a power factor of 0.8 lagging, the load to be transmitted is 14.956 MVA and
the length of the line is 129.62 km. The line is modeled as a medium-length
transmission line.
L kW 129.62 14,956(0.8)
kV = 5.5√ + = 5.5 √ + = 77.91 kV
1.6 100 1.6 100
From the table of standard voltages, we select 115 kV as the line voltages. For 115 kV
systems, the conductor to be used is 266.8 MCM ACSR (Partridge).
Solve for the sending-end current, assuming 0.8 lagging power factor,
Ss 14.956 × 106
Is = = = 75.08∠ − 36.87° A
√3 Es √3 (115 × 103 )
From the ACSR table, look for the resistance of the conductor.
R = 0.255 Ω/km
Solve for the geometric mean distance (GMD) assuming a triangular configuration
with spacing of 9.3 m, 9.3 m , and 8.8 m between conductors.
3
GMD = √7.6 × 7.6 × 6.6 = 7.25 m
8
From the ACSR table look for the radius (r) and geometric mean radius (GMR) of the
conductors.
d
r= = 16.30 mm/2 = 8.15 mm = 0.815 cm
2
GMD 7.25
L = 0.2 ln ( ) = 0.2 ln ( ) = 1.4 mH /km
GMR 0.66142 × 10−2
Solving for the capacitance, capacitive reactance, and shunt admittance of the line,
0.0556 0.0556
C= = = 8.188 nF/km
GMD 7.25
ln ( r ) ln ( )
0.815 × 10−2
1 1
Xc = = = 323.96 kΩ ∙ km
2πfC 2π(60)(8.188 × 10−9 )
1 1
y = j( ) = j( ) = 3.09 μS/km
XC 323.96 × 103
ZY (33.05 + j68.7Ω)(j0.4mS )
A=D=1+ = 1+
2 2
ZY −3
(33.05 + j68.7)(j0.4 × 10−3 )
𝐶 = Y (1 + ) = (j0.4 × 10 ) (1 + )
4 4
C = j3.973 × 10−4 S
115 × 103
= (0.99∠0.38°) ( ) − (76.24 ∠64.31°)(75.08∠ − 36.87°)
√3
IR = −CESN + DIS
115×103
= −(j3.973 × 10−4 ) ( ) + (0.99∠0.38°)(75.08∠ − 36.87°)
√3
IR = 92.5 ∠ − 49.75° A
= 0.7 lagging
PR 11.79
𝜂= × 100% = × 100% = 100%
PS 14.596(0.8)
11
Assuming a power factor of 0.8 lagging, the load to be transmitted is 30 MW and the
length of the line is 171.3 km. The line is modeled as a medium-length transmission
line.
L kW 171.3 30000(0.8)
kV = 5.5√ + = 5.5 √ + = 102.463 kV
1.6 100 1.6 100
From the table of standard voltages, we select 115 kV as the line voltages. For
115 kV systems, the conductor to be used is 266.8 MCM ACSR (Partridge).
Solve for the sending-end current, assuming 0.8 lagging power factor,
Ss 30 × 106
Is = = = 150.61∠ − 36.87°
√3 Es √3 (115 × 103 )
From the ACSR table, look for the resistance of the conductor.
R = 0.255 Ω/km
Solve for the geometric mean distance (GMD) assuming a triangular configuration
with spacing of 9.3 m, 9.3 m , and 8.8 m between conductors.
3
GMD = √7.6 × 7.6 × 6.6 = 7.25 m
From the ACSR table look for the radius (r) and geometric mean radius (GMR) of the
conductors.
d
r= = 16.30 mm/2 = 8.15 mm = 0.815 cm
2
12
𝐺𝑀𝐷 7.25
𝐿 = 0.2 ln ( ) = 0.2 ln ( ) = 1.4 𝑚𝐻 /𝑘𝑚
𝐺𝑀𝑅 0.66142 × 10−2
Solving for the capacitance, capacitive reactance, and shunt admittance of the line,
0.0556 0.0556
C= = = 8.188 nF/km
GMD 7.25
ln ( r ) ln ( )
0.815 × 10−2
1 1
Xc = = = 323.96 kΩ ∙ km
2πfC 2π(60)(8.188 × 10−9 )
1 1
y = j( ) = j( ) = 3.09 μS/km
XC 323.96 × 103
ZY (43.68 + j90.79Ω)(j0.53 mS )
A=D=1+ = 1+
2 2
C = j5.24 × 10−4 S
115 × 103
= (0.976∠0.68° ) ( ) − (100.75 ∠64.31°)(150.61∠ − 36.87°)
√3
IR = −CESN + DIS
−4
115 × 103
= −(j5.24 × 10 S) ( ) + (0.976∠0.68°)(150.61∠ − 36.87°)
√3
14
IR = 169.875 ∠ − 45.70° A
= 0.779 lagging
PR 20.53
𝜂= × 100% = × 100% = 85.54%
PS 30(0.8)
15
Assuming a power factor of 0.8 lagging, the load to be transmitted is 8.755 MVA and
the length of the line is 34.028 km. The line is modeled as a short-length transmission
line.
L kW 34.028 8755(0.8)
kV = 5.5√ + = 5.5 √ + = 52.56 kV
1.6 100 1.6 100
From the table of standard voltages, we select 69 kV as the line voltages. For 69 kV
systems, the conductor to be used is #4/0 ACSR (Penguin).
Solve for the sending-end current, assuming 0.8 lagging power factor,
Ss 8.755 × 106
Is = = = 73.26∠ − 36.87° A
√3 Es √3 (69 × 103 )
From the ACSR table, look for the resistance of the conductor.
R = 0.390 Ω/km
Solve for the geometric mean distance (GMD) assuming a triangular configuration
with spacing of 4.3 m, 4.3 m , and 4 m between conductors.
3
GMD = √4.3 × 4.3 × 4 = 4.2 m
From the ACSR table look for the radius (r) and geometric mean radius (GMR) of the
conductors.
d
r= = 14.31 mm/2 = 7.155 mm = 0.7155 cm
2
GMD 4.2
L = 0.2 ln ( ) = 0.2 ln ( ) = 1.325 mH /km
GMR 0.5572 × 10−2
Ω
Z = (0.390 + j0.499 ) × 34.028 km = 13.27 + j16.98Ω
km
= 21.55∠51.99°
IR = IS = 73.26∠ − 36.87° A
PR 6.822
𝜂= × 100% = × 100% = 97.4%
PS 8.755(0.8)
18
Assuming a power factor of 0.8 lagging, the load to be transmitted is 9 MVA and the
length of the line is 34.112 km. The line is modeled as a short-length transmission
line.
L kW 34.112 9000(0.8)
kV = 5.5√ + = 5.5 √ + = 53.13 kV
1.6 100 1.6 100
From the table of standard voltages, we select 69 kV as the line voltages. For
69 kV systems, the conductor to be used is #4/0 ACSR (Penguin).
Solve for the sending-end current, assuming 0.8 lagging power factor,
Ss 9 × 106
Is = = = 75.31∠ − 36.87° A
√3 Es √3 (69 × 103 )
From the ACSR table, look for the resistance of the conductor.
R = 0.390 Ω/km
Solve for the geometric mean distance (GMD) assuming a triangular configuration
with spacing of 4.3 m, 4.3 m , and 4 m between conductors.
3
GMD = √4.3 × 4.3 × 4 = 4.2 m
From the ACSR table look for the radius (r) and geometric mean radius (GMR) of the
conductors.
d
r= = 14.31 mm/2 = 7.155 mm = 0.7155 cm
2
19
GMD 4.2
L = 0.2 ln ( ) = 0.2 ln ( ) = 1.325 mH /km
GMR 0.5572 × 10−2
= 21.61∠51.99°
69 × 103
=( ) − (75.31∠ − 36.87°)(21.61∠51.99°)
√3
IR = IS = 75.31∠ − 36.87° A
20
= 0.806 lagging
Solving for the voltage regulator,
Es − ER 69 − 66.28
%VR = × 100% = × 100% = 4.104%
ER 66.28
PR 6.97
𝜂= × 100% = × 100% = 96.805%
PS 9(0.8)
21
Assuming a power factor of 0.8 lagging, the load to be transmitted is 41.561 MVA
and the length of the line is 40.734 km. The line is modeled as a short-length
transmission line.
L kW 40.734 41561(0.8)
kV = 5.5√ + = 5.5 √ + = 104.06 kV
1.6 100 1.6 100
From the table of standard voltages, we select 115 kV as the line voltages. For
115 kV systems, the conductor to be used is 266.8 MCM ACSR (Partridge).
Solve for the sending-end current, assuming 0.8 lagging power factor,
Ss 41.561 × 106
Is = = = 208.65∠ − 36.87° A
√3 Es √3 (115 × 103 )
From the ACSR table, look for the resistance of the conductor.
R = 0.255 Ω/km
Solve for the geometric mean distance (GMD) assuming a triangular configuration
with spacing of 7.6 m, 7.6 m, and 6.6 m between conductors.
3
GMD = √7.6 × 7.6 × 6.6 = 7.25 m
From the ACSR table look for the radius (r) and geometric mean radius (GMR) of the
conductors.
d
r= = 16.30 mm/2 = 8.15 mm = 0.815cm
2
GMD 7.25
L = 0.2 ln ( ) = 0.2 ln ( ) = 1.408mH /km
GMR 0.635 × 10−2
= 23.995∠64.35°
115×103
=( ) − (208.65∠ − 36.87° )(23.995∠64.35°)
√3
IR = IS = 208.65∠ − 36.87° A
= 0.822 lagging
PR 31.9
𝜂= × 100% = 41.561(0.8) × 100% = 95.943%
PS
24
Assuming a power factor of 0.8 lagging, the load to be transmitted is 30.91 MVA and
the length of the line is 57.791 km. The line is modeled as a short-length transmission
line.
L kW 57.791 30910(0.8)
kV = 5.5√ + = 5.5 √ + = 92.59 kV
1.6 100 1.6 100
From the table of standard voltages, we select 115 kV as the line voltages. For
115 kV systems, the conductor to be used is 266.8 MCM ACSR (Partridge).
Solve for the sending-end current, assuming 0.8 lagging power factor,
Ss 30.91 × 106
Is = = = 155.18∠ − 36.87° A
√3 Es √3 (115 × 103 )
From the ACSR table, look for the resistance of the conductor.
R = 0.255 Ω/km
Solve for the geometric mean distance (GMD) assuming a triangular configuration
with spacing of 7.6 m, 7.6 m, and 6.6 m between conductors.
3
GMD = √7.6 × 7.6 × 6.6 = 7.25 m
From the ACSR table look for the radius (r) and geometric mean radius (GMR) of the
conductors.
d
r= = 16.30 mm/2 = 8.15 mm = 0.815cm
2
GMD 7.25
L = 0.2 ln ( ) = 0.2 ln ( ) = 1.408mH /km
GMR 0.635 × 10−2
= 34.042∠64.35°
115 × 103
=( ) − (155.18∠ − 36.87° )(34.042∠64.35°)
√3
IR = IS = 155.18∠ − 36.87°A
= 0.817 lagging
26
PR 23.94
𝜂= × 100% = × 100% = 96.813%
PS 30.91 (0.8)
27
For distribution line calculation, consider the distribution system of Liquid Substation.
For the neutral conductor, the conductor used is #2 ACSR (Swanate). From the ACSR
table, the diameter of #2ACSR (Swanate) is 6.54 mm. Computing for GMRN,
𝑝𝑓 = 𝑐𝑜𝑠𝜃 = 0.8
𝜃 = 𝑐𝑜𝑠 −1 (0.8) = 36.87°
Assume voltage increase of 5% at the substation.
𝐸𝑆 = 7620 𝑥 1.05 = 8001∠0° 𝑉
𝐸𝑆 − 𝐸𝑅 8001 − 5492.98
% 𝑉𝑅 = 𝑥 100% = 𝑥100% = 45.66%
𝐸𝑅 5492.98
Consider Phase B
pf = cos = 0.8
=cos-1(0.8) = 36.87°
Consider Phase C
pf = cos = 0.8
=cos-1(0.8) = 36.87°
For the neutral conductor, the conductor used is #4 ACSR (Swanate). From the ACSR
table, the diameter of #4 ACSR (Swanate) is 6.54 mm. Computing for GMRN,
𝑝𝑓 = 𝑐𝑜𝑠𝜃 = 0.8
𝜃 = 𝑐𝑜𝑠 −1 (0.8) = 36.87°
Assume voltage increase of 5% at the substation.
𝐸𝑆 = 7620 𝑥 1.05 = 8001∠0° 𝑉
𝐸𝑆 − 𝐸𝑅 8001 − 2789.99
% 𝑉𝑅 = 𝑥 100% = 𝑥100% = 186.77%
𝐸𝑅 2789.99
35
Consider Phase B
pf = cos = 0.8
=cos-1(0.8) = 36.87°
Consider Phase C
pf = cos = 0.8
=cos-1(0.8) = 36.87°
𝐸𝑆 − 𝐸𝑅 8001 − 3800.98∠
% 𝑉𝑅 = 𝑥 100% = 𝑥100% = 110.5%
𝐸𝑅 3800.98∠
APPENDICES
A. Tables
I. Subdivision 1.
II. Subdivision 2.
III. Subdivision 3.
OG SUBSTATION CAPACITY
Capacity Line
Name of Establishment Location KVA L1 L2 L3
RESIDENTIAL
Good Subdivision (#1) Buluan 1033.426 342.440 363.195 327.791
Bad Subdivision (#2) Buluan 1058.836 323.744 387.548 347.544
New
Veronica Subdivision (#3) Busuanga 1033.426 342.440 363.195 327.791
New
Alay Ko Subdivision (#1) Busuanga 1033.426 342.440 363.195 327.791
Tanggo Subdivision (#2) San Rafael 1058.836 323.744 387.548 347.544
COMMERCIAL
Gold Motel Buluan 1051.630 250.550 350.550 450.530
WP Resto Bar Buluan 954.100 370.770 250.000 333.330
Aluminum Gas Station Buluan 500.000 250.000 150.000 100.000
New
SF Motel Busuanga 851.220 250.000 250.550 350.670
New
Kinalimutan Mall Busuanga 3000.000 1000.000 1000.000 1000.000
Nevermore Motel San Rafael 1051.630 250.550 350.550 450.530
INDUSTRIAL
Para Sa Masa Port Buluan 1456.760 550.540 555.550 350.670
New
Port Port Busuanga 1351.770 650.660 250.230 450.880
Total KVA 15435.060 5247.878 5022.111 5165.071
Line Current 688.698 659.070 677.831
Total MVA 15.435
I. OG Substation.
54
55
56
57
58
Capacity Line
RESIDENTIAL
Rasta Day Subdivision Old
(#2) Busuanga 1058.836 323.744 387.548 347.544
Old
Antok Subdivision (#2) Busuanga 1058.836 323.744 387.548 347.544
COMMERCIAL
Old
Infinity Mall Busuanga 1134.410 333.330 350.550 450.530
Capacity Line
RESIDENTIAL
COMMERCIAL
INDUSTRIAL
IV LIQUID Substation.
V. NEWBIE Substation.
X. FNATIC Substation
Designer’s Profile
FERDINAND O. MAZON
Barangay Tiniguiban, Kaakbayan, Puerto Princesa
City, Palawan
Mobile Number: 09096550760
Email Address: [email protected]
PERSONAL DATA
Gender : Male
Civil Status : Single
Citizenship : Filipino
Height : 5’7”
Mass : 50 kg
Religion : Catholic
Language : Filipino, English
Father’s Name : Rexel Thomas N. Mazon
Mother’s Name : Rhodora O. Mazon
Drawings
114
115
116
117