0 ratings0% found this document useful (0 votes) 231 views10 pagesIso 2768 1 PDF
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content,
claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
ISO
INTERNATIONAL STANDARD 3269
Second edition
1988-12-15
INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION FOR STANDARDIZATION
ORGANISATION INTERNATIONALE DE NORMALISATION
MEKAYHAPORHIAR OPFANMSALMR NO CTARAAPTAGALHA
Fasteners — Acceptance inspection
iéments de ration — Contre de réception
Referees number
bY 50 3269: 1988180 3269 : 1988 (E)
Foreword
180 Itho Intemational Organization for Standardizotion) isa worldwide federation of
rational standerds bodies (ISO member bodies}. The work of praparing International
Standards is normally cartied out through ISO technical committees, Each member
bbody interested in a subject tor which a technical corerittae has been established has
the tight to be represented on that committee. International organizations, govern
‘ental and non-governmental, in lisison with ISO, algo take part in the work. ISO
Zlaborates closely with the intemational Electrotechnical Commission (HEC) on all
matters of electrotechnics! standardization.
Draft International Standards adopted by the technical committees ate circulated 10
‘he member bodies for approval before their acceptance as International Standards by
thg ISO Council. They are approved in accardancs wh ISO procedures requiring at
least 75 % approval by the member bodies voting,
Ingernationah Standart (SO 3260 was propared by Technical Committee ISO/TC 2,
Fasteners.
‘Tie second edition cancels and replaces the fist edition {ISO 3269 : 1984), of which it
‘canstitutas a technical revision. in particule,
‘a the terms “defect” and “defective” have been replaced by "nonconformity”
‘and “nongontotming unit”;
b)_ AQLvalues for dimensional and mechenical characteristics for plain washers
and pins have been specified.
-
_sers should note that all International Standards undesgo revision fom time to time
‘and that any reference made herein to any other International Standard implies its
latest edition, unless otherwise stated.
© International Organization for Standardization, 1988 #
Printed in SwitzerondsINTERNATIONAL STANDARD
1SO 3269 : 1988(E)
Fasteners — Acceptance inspection
1 Scope and field of application
4.1. This international Standard specifies the procadura to be
‘ollowed by the purchaser at his acceptance inspection in order
to decide whether a lot of fasteners may be accepted or ro-
jected. when no other acceptance procedure hes been agreed
with the suppiier at the time of ordering the fasteners. Addi-
ora specific acceptability requirements may be included
within 3 specific product standard (tor example, prevaiing
torque type nuts). The procedure is also to be apeilad when
conformance 0 specification is disputed.
1.2. applies to bolt, screws, studs, nuts, pins, washors and
other related fasteners not intended for high-volume machine
assembly, for spetial purpose applications or for specialy
‘engineered applications requiring greater in-process controls
{and lot taceabily. Procedures for these products shall be
‘aureed between supplier and user prior to confirmation of the
order.
1.3. Ieapplis to fully manufactured products anly and nelthor
|mplies nor includes any particular in-orocess contol procedure
or inspection during production.
1. Accessories, services and partially fabricated parts {for
‘example, washers, mits, plating, heat treatment, blanks, etc.)
‘may be purchased by the supplier from other suppiers for use
in production of fastoners. However, the supper of the fully
manufactured product shall be solely responsible forthe quality
‘af tho final product.
Any plating of other process carried out by the user after
teceiat of the fasteners shal validate the requirernents ofthis
‘international Standard.
1.5 The annex gives notes for guidance and the rationale
bbohind this International Seandard,
2 References
180 898-1, Mechanical propertias af fasteners ~ Port 1: Balt,
serews and studs.
'S0 898-2, Mechanical properties of fasteners — Part 2: Nuts
with specified proof load valves.
Win preparation.
'S0 988-6, Mechanical properties of fasteners — Part 6: Nuts
With specified proof load values — Fine pitch thread.
180 2869, Sampling procedures and tables for inspection by
atinbutes,
'80 3608, Corrasian-resisiant stainless steel fasteners —
Specitications.
150 3594, Statistics, vocabulary and symbols,
1S0 4768-1, Tolerances for fasteners — Part 1: Bolts, screws
‘and puts with thread diameters > 1,8 and < 150 mm and
product grades A, B and C,
180 4759.3, Tolerances for fasteners — Part 3: Washers for
‘metric bohts, screws and nuts with tread dlamerers from | up
{0 and including 180 nmr — Product grades A and C.
180 5157-1, Fasteners — Surface discontinuities — Part 1
Bolts, screws and studs for genersl requirements.
180 6157-2, Fasteners — Surface alscontinulties — Part 2:
‘Nuts with thread sizes MS to M39.)
1S0 6157.3, Fastaners — Surface alscontinuities — Part 3:
Bolts, serewss and studs for special requirements.
3° General requirements
3.1. Although every fastener should meet all rnquiroments of
its standard specification, in mass production this is not avay
‘possible. Depending on the intendad function ard utilization, it
Ig neither necessary nor economic alvays to separate fasteners
‘which meet all requirements from those which do not,
3.2. For production quality control, the manufacturer may use
any inspection procedure, hut due care shall be taken during ail,
production stages that the fastoners will satisty the respective
standords.
“The designation of an AOL shal net imply that zhe supplier has
‘the right fo supply knowingly any defective unit of product.= 180 3269 : 1988 (E)
2.3 The user may test the fasteners dallvered for function and
‘tization, as he judges necessary or economically justifiable,
provided thatthe supplier's risks not more than 6 % for aimen-
sional and 12 % for mechanical requicermants (see table 2),
unless prior agreement has been reached.
3.4 It's important that, during acceptance inspection, stress
's lsd on the fitness of the product to perform is inter
‘turction, Objections shall only be raised ifthe nonconformities
Imair the intended tunctior ad ar utilization of the fasteners.
The user shall give the supplier the opportunity of vetting,
oncontormities discovered,
Ha the time of inspection the subsequent function is uncertain,
{for example, stock parts, any deviation from the specified
‘olerances shall be regarded as impairing the function and/or
utlization.
775 A rejected lot of fasteners may not be presented for re-
‘ection unless the nonconformity has been rected or the
lot sorted ‘eee 5.5).
NOTE — teach rectification could impair te imendod fureton ard
aati, requres the conser ofthe usr
3.8 Gauges and messuring instruments used for inspection
‘may not dotermine any fastener t9 be unscceptable if infact the
fastener dimensions ard properties are within specification
tits,
IF disputes arise, direct measurements should be made for
‘ecsion.
3.7 Also when the lot satisfies the acceptance conditions of
this International Standard, it is possible to reject single
‘astanars which do not meet the agreed techrical require
mers.
‘The folowing definitions apply for the purposes of this Inter
rations Standard; they are based on ISO 3534.
4.1. acceptance inspection: All the procedures such as
‘sempling, gauging, measuring, comparing and testing
‘necessary 10 decide whether a lot of fasteners should be
accepted.
42 supplier: Manufacturer of me fasteners, or @ dealer or
representative who supplies the fasteners.
4.3 purchaser: Receiver oF his tepresentative who receives
the fasteners: this is not necessarily the final usar of the
estenass.
4.4 inspection tot: Definita quantity of fasteners of a single
‘ype, tolerance grade, property class and size, manufactured
Lundee conditions which are presumed uniform and submitted
by a supplier for inspection at one time.
4.5 lot size iN): Number of fasteners contained in alot
4.6 sample: One or more fasteners drawn from a lot, taken
at random so that all fasteners have an equal chance of selec-
tion.
7 sample size (n}: Number of fasteners in the sample
{8 characteristic: Dimensional element, mechanical prop-
‘erty of other recognisable feature of @ product for which limits
ate spacified, far axampie, head height, body diameter, tensile
strength or hardness,
4.9 major characteristic: Characteristic which, if noncon
forming, i key to ragut ina falure orto reduce materially the
‘of the fastener for its intendad purpose,
4.10 minor characteristic: Characwistic that is neither
Ficely to reduce materially the usability of the fastener for it in
‘ended purpose, nor @ departure from established specifict-
‘ions having itl bearing on the effective use or operation of
the fastener.
4M. nonconformity: Oepacture of a quality characteristic
‘hat results in a product not meeting a specitied rempirernent.
12. nonconforming unit: Fastener with one or mora nor:
conforms.
4.13 acceptance number (Act: Maximum number of non=
conforming units in any given sampla that stil alias accep
‘ance of the lot.
4.14 sampting plan: Plan according to which a sample is
taken in order 19 ebtain information and te reach 8 decision a”
the aeceptarce of the lot.
4.16 acceptable quality level (AQUI: Quaity love! whch in
sampling plan corresponds to a specified relatively high
probability of acceptance,
4.18 _limiving quatty (LQ): Quality level which ina sampling
plan corresponds to a specified and relatively tow probability ot
sccentancs.
{Oye Is the percentage of noncanforming urits in the
characteristic of the submitted product which has a one-in-ten
chance of being accepted hy the sampling plan; it is often
‘known 36 the consumer's tsk
4.17 supplier’ risk: Degree of probabiity mat 3 fot does
not satisty the agteed technical requirements, the quality lave!
lof which eoes correspond to the respoctive AQL. value, when a
sampling plan is used.
4.18 probability of acceptance (P,): Probability that 2 lot
which contains a certain number of nonconforming units can
rot be rejected a5 a whole on the basis of a sampling pian.& Acceptance inspection procedure for
dimensional and mechanical property
characteristics of fasteners
5:1. Find the description of the fastener to be inspected for
dimensions! characteristics in tables 1a) to Ic), note the
appropriate characteristic to be inspected and the associated
‘AOL value, For mechanical property characteristics, note the
characteristic to be inspected and the associated AQL value
fom tables 2a) to 3c)
5.2 Choose the appropriate ratio LOyg/AQL in accordance
with 3.3 for examples, see table 2.
Notes
1 Multiplying this cao by dw AGL vale gives ths Lig. The Lie
sll comaspand tothe function andor utzon ofthe fastener. For
‘ore important functions and/or uillzatons ofthe fastener, We LGha
‘Value may be smal ut tis recuires greater sample sizes and higher
inspectan cosis. lt may be possible to reduce the proportion of
fastoners inspect fram known saurces with continuous production
‘comateBy choosing 8 greater ratio LO AL, it me lots napectod xo
‘ar have shown good quatiy. Conversa, it may be necessary to im
crac the proportion ingpected ifthe lot cannot be presumed to be
‘riform otis not from one manufacturer. The ratio LOyy/ ACL used
‘shall be within the sole judgement of the purchaser
2. The sampling plans in sabe 2 ae darormined bythe chow of ACL
and of customer's tek (LOI. Once theeo two parameters have been
chosen, he same size, accaptance number, and suppl’ rik tofow
automaticaly. The lot sze/sampe size lationship in table 1 of
SO 2858, which isintended vo apply ony in the case of production of
‘continuous seas of las, i not appropiate. Table 2.can howtre’ 9¢
sppied to such a case, Sut alee apelcable co isclate# ts by suitable
choice of LO In cave of spute between gurchaser and supper. 3
Samping plan shat be chosen accovcing to which he supple’ tk
not higher than that lid oven in 3.3
5.3 Knowing the AOL and the chosen ratio LOy9/AQL. find
the sample size and the acceptance number, for example from
rable 2
5.4 Select the sample in accordance with 4.6, For each
characteristic, cary out the inspection, note the cumber of
nonconforming units and acoegt the lot f the number of nor
‘conforrning units is equal te or lower then the acceptance
‘umber.
1SO 3269 : 1988 (E)
5.5 In the event of rejection, suitable disposal ofthe lot shall
be agreed upon by purchaser and supplier (see 3.6)
5.6 The samples for the tensile test [see tables 3al to Sci]
shoud where possible ba those used forthe hardness tec, with
tha lowest and/or highest hardness figures. (The tensile test,
being destructive, requires fewer samples. than the non-
destructive ardnoss test.)
The proof load testis regried as a destructive test.
Examples:
1 Inspection of threads for hexagon bolts, grade A of a
supplier well known for his steady quality; therefore ratio
LO;g/AQL of 6,2 is applicabie:
AQL 1 — Sample
19 80 — Acceptance number Ae 2.
2. Inspection of the driving media for hexagon socket head
Screws of an unknown supplier: therefora the ratio LOjg/AQL
has to bo lowered t0 3,7
AQL 1 — Sample
Be 10.
ize 500 — Acceptance number
3 Inspection of the mechanical property: stress under aroot
load tor nuts:
AQL 15 — Sample size 8 ~ Acceptance number Ac 0.
5.7 Nondestructive (visual) tests for detecting surace
discontinurties cannot siways give results of the type and
dimension of the discontinuity: this car be verified by destruc:
‘ive tests only. Therefore greater samite sizes are necessary for
the non-destructive test for surface ciscominuites to ‘densify
those fasteners which consequently shal be subject to destruc
tive testing,
If during visual inspection, any fastener is found with quench
‘tacks in any locstion, or folds at or below the bearing surface,
except “clover leat" folds in non-circular fasteners, the iot shall
be rejected.
If on the desvuctive test any fastener is found with seams,
bursts, shear bursts, forging cracks, surface discontinuities on
the thread, tool marks, voids or damages, which excaed the
‘Mlowable limits specified for the applicable type of ciscom
tinuity, the fot shall be rejected.180 3269 : 1988 (E)
Table 1a) ~ Dimensional characteristics for threaded factanare
Pee
ils
ulblecaly u
soles iar ae
horctra ae] g | ay: r F
a t 2 #
falalejalp
ge =
ge] i 5
Pla
ia
wa across fe Tsp. pw ae] ae
Lith actos comers 1 yey 1 Ss
4. Cha ot en socket 7 ws
- 4D enstes ne ; te tis
een pain Sn ee
aes ta
} [emesoe i he be
This bas Tas [as
4 z
ala fasta la le
1) Chavactrstics shall bo individually asonee.
21 The prediact grates seer tw the dassiiention of
10 «750-1.
3). Product Sropery cash for nuts: ge 150 86-2,
the produot with regard to fit and tolerances. ‘See
48) For feaqures aft in the hot forged condi use an AQL of 2.5. Hot-forged preducts sal bo prasad for
“napestion sapere
‘Table Wb} — Dimensions) characteristics tor plain washers.
‘Applicable dimensional
Grade S
co
18
Outiae diameter 18 25
[Pics characteris, i ots 25 é
1) Characteities shal be incividuniyastenees.
2) The ptoduer grades refer to the cassiation of
180 47503.)
‘the srosuct with cogard to fit and tolrances. (Soe1SO 3269 : 1988 (E)
Table 1c} — Dimensional characteristics for pins
Product rue
Aoiicabe imensiont Posies [Ta Gas
orectonnaca ES one me
mat
iis aie 7 7
Malor or re i
chavocteritics ‘Surface roughness 1 1 1
Teer 7
ee, | Alone 2s 28 as
1) Cheracusitcs shail be indiidvaly assess,
Tabla 2 — Examples of sampling plans t
e
Acceptance a rio
rumor 068 1 15 « Le
Bmp ‘at
’ 2 ~ ] is 6 3 188 2
to @ | = |= 2 78 3
[2 |» | ® 62 5
2 zo |= | 2 a2 <
3 a5 | x0 | % aa 2
7 eo [ais [a0 » 37 a
0 0] ate 7s 3 2
a 0 0 28 z
zr a5 22 7
1} Alliguras in ths able have bean taken trom ISO 2868, LO AOL ratios are mean valves.
2) the lot sie is less than the equiod sample size, 109 % igpection shal be carved out180 3269 : 1988 (E)
‘Table 3a) — Mechanical characteristics for threaded fasteners
Applicable Carbon or alloy steel ‘Stainiess steot
ee [ea Setapara| to cao
Sa], | me [eee | eo sop
See 150 838, 60 2505 [bons screws} NM | serewa | chvead form Nate
Ssgag 809 [eos se ed ECS
nat
noes os pase] ae uae [aa
ie
Permangne strain2? 1s
Cerra
at frecture® 18
Sieg nr ot 1s i.
oa
Son :
Soe ere
Nouraetea | 06 | as | om | ow
comene ess
Denn :
(class 78.8) S
iene is
wane is fas
aa wes om Las
1) Other characteristics may be required according to he specication apaleabl, for example performance of
Prevaling toraue type nus.
2 Tense strength and stress at 0.2 % permanent sain may be chacked in the same test.
3) Ysera applicable aonording 10 the steel grades concerned.
4) in accordance with International Standards
‘Table 36) — Mechanical characteristics for plain washers
Carbon oralioy stool | Stinlo
Applicable mechanical
‘charactoristice’” ROL
Hardness Oe =
5) Other characioies may be required according to the spelfiction applicable,
2), Use mate identification test: a future Intematonsi Standard wil cover this subject.
‘Table 3e} — Mechanical characteristics for pins
Product grous
Applicable mechanical
herectentetes™ Parallel, taper and elev pint
AGL
[Sher arent
Hordes os
1) Inaccordance with product standards. Other characteristics msy be required eccording tothe specification
eppicabie.
ie
geISO 3269 : 1988 (E)
Annex
Notes for guidance and rationale
(This annex does not form part of the Standard.)
AA General
{tis not possible to prevent nonconforming units occurring in
‘mass production. In eartculer, therafore, larger lots may ccea-
sionally contain some nonconforming units . Technical re-
‘avirements do not generally demand that these nonconforming
‘units be sorted out, a procedura which isin ary case difficult
and uneconomic.
Each nonconforming unit. the nonconformity in which may
adversely affect its intended use te a greater than negighle
‘extont, may be cause for complaint
the customer tests each unt, and therefore the total delivery,
he will, Himsoff, sort out the nonconforming units and can
make @ complaint, it necessary. The procedures and AQL
values specified in ISO 3269 are not used, in these cases,
Larger tots are usually only subjected to random sampling by
the customer. The results of random inspection permit the
deduction, with a higher or lower degree of probability only, of
the actual number of nonconforming units present in the
inspection lot; probabality here depends on the sample size
laxsant of testing)
A2 Purpose
‘The purpose of this international Standard is the specification
of objective criteria for deciding under what circumstances a
complaint may be raised about a whole lot, without knowledge
lof the precise propartion of nonconforming units in the lt.
This is intended to protect the supplier, a8 far a5 possible,
against complaints about thase inspection lots in which tne
proportion of nonconforming units és smell (smaler then the
‘AL valuel, but where it has wrongly been indicated t0 bo
too great as a result of unsuitable sampling inspection {for
‘example, because sample sizes wore too small
3. Background to clause 1
‘This Intemational Standard therefore specifies quality limits
(AQL values) and sampling plers, where the supplier's risk of
5 % for dimensions and 12 % for mechanical properties of lots
\with a percent nonconforming equal to the AQL value 's not
exceeded.
(On the one hand, this specification protects the supplier, but
‘on the ather hand it aves the customer the necossary freedom,
te choose the sampling plan that is required for technical
reasons,
‘The customer can therefore match the extent of inspection
with functional cequirements and with the experience gained
‘rom previous late received from the same supplier (quality
history). The greater the sample size, Le. the nearer the LO.
value of the sampling plan is to the AQL, the greater is the
probability of recognizing lors where the percent nonconform-
ing appreciably exceeds the AOL value, but the grester, 100,
the effort and expense involved. Using this system the
customer ean select the technical and economic optimum
suitable for himself
A4 Background to clause 3
‘The foliowing relationship exists between the sampling plan
(sample size, acceprance number) and the AQL and LO values
Each sempling plan is described by its operating characteristic
curve OC see the figura}. ft shows the probabilities of accep:
tanee in @ semoling inspection as a function of the actual pet
tent nonconforming in the inspection lot. The paints on the
operating characteristic curve indicating 9 $6 % and a 10 9%
probability of acceptance have been selected forthe determina-
tion of suitable sampling. The 96 % paint of the operating
characteristic curve is requited to be equal to of greater than
the AQL value specified. The 19 % point on the operation
characteristic curve (LQjq value! is to be solacted by the
customer at his own discretion, The LO,y vaive corresponds to
the percent nonconforming in inspection ‘ots which is highly
Fikly (90 % probability] to give rise to complaints.
Probibity of acceptance me
a
Percent noncantarming ee
NOTE — For AGL ~ 1, samoiing plans 80/2 and 500/10 are pormiend
‘whereas 80/1 i act permite Isupelier's risk Righer zr 6%),
Figur
— Operating characteristic curves for sampling
plans~ 180 2269 : 1968 (E)
‘This International Standard includes table 2 for users having no
sampling system of their own. The LQjg value in each case is
calculated from this table by multiplying the ratio LOy/ACL by
the AQL value
‘Samaling inspection is only used to decide on the acceptance
Or rajaction of the whole lot. Complaints about individual non
conforming units ae not affected by this and are possible, even
If there fs no complaint about the lot as a whole and it has boen
accented,
During the discussions on AQL values, it was generally
‘recognised that 2 complaint rat for whole deliveries of § % for
dimensional nonconformities and 12 % for nonconforming
‘mechanical properties was, 35.9 Tule, uneconomic for the
supoly of fasteners. The AOL values and the supplier's risk
specified in this International Standard are, therefore, oniy
characteristic values for the determination of suitable sarnoling
plans. The quality of fasteners manufactured is usually better
_pafran the AOL value,
AS Clause 3: further information
‘The manufacturer tors his products at his own discretion,
using the means and methods which seem appropriate to him,
according 12 his knowledge of the correlations between
manufacturing processes, materials, types of fasteners and the
frequency of nonconformities. He isnot obliged to use the pro-
cesess and tests described in this Interretfonal Standard, either
in manufacture or in final inspection, if re can produce the
same result using different means and methods,
“The customer also has the possibilty of using any test which
appears to him to be suitable. However, a more severe test
flower AGL values or lower probability oF acceptancel may only
be used as the basis for a dacision an compiaints about an in-
spection lot, if such a deviation from this International Sten-
ard was expressly agroed at the sme of ordering.
‘Some deviations from tolerances or fimits specified tave m9
averse effects either on the function or on the use of the
fasteners and, in accordance with 3.4, no complaints should be
‘msde about these. For example, the ISO thread tolerances pro-
vide for some pay, to allow electroplating tobe applied without
‘adverse effect on the functioning of the threads. ifthe upper
limit of the effective bolt thread diameter is exceeded slightly,
‘and itis known that this thread wll not be coated, this dovia-
tion ean have no eciverso effects on the function oF the use of
the screws and no complaint shall be made. (For further deta,
see “Inspection sampling and complaint cisuses in dafvery
standards” by G. Hewzo.D in DIN-Mitreiungen 57, 1978,
No. 12, pp. 697-7014
Regardless of thei natura and the use of gauges and measuring
Instruments, the diferent measurement and inspection pro
‘cedures shall not qualify any part as nonconforming if the
‘actual values stil le within the specified limit.
‘The standards dealing with inspection and measurement pro-
‘cedures specify how this principle isto be realized in individual
_methods and for individual items of test equipment, The effect
‘of the uncertsinty of inspection methods and measuring equip
‘ment shal bo included in the assessment of the resuits of in-
sspection and measurement, in referee cases.
AG Background to clause 5
‘The classitication into main and secondary characteristics was
made in accordance with the major functions of fasteners.
Other clossfications may be agreed at the time of ordering
However, these may possibly increase production costs,
Properties for which no mits are specified in 1$0 2288 or in
‘other International Standards, for example ISO 898-1,
180 898-2 or ISO 898.6, or in dimansional Standards, may be
imporant in individual cases. In order to avois misunderstan-
«ings, petriasible mit values andi or limit specimens shall be
‘exchanged at the time of ordering.
Inspection of mechanical pronetios, materials and coatings re-
‘quires considerable resources. In order to reduce the resources
requited for inspecting lots, fasteners of the same type, prop-
ety class, finish or thosa made from the same material, which
differ only in length, for instance may be treated as being of the
‘same type.
Limit values have boen specified for the greater part of the
Droperties to be assessed. Depending on the function of the
part and the deviation from the limits datermined, agreement
‘may have to be reached between the supplier and the customer
in the individual case in which nonconformities hava been
‘found regarding acceptance, rejection oF further machining or
processing, possibly an the basis of additional inspections.
Rocarding test vesuits obtained trom various lots supplied by 3
supplicr gives a statistically representative picture of the aualty
level ofthis supplior over @ corresponding period. Iris therefore
recommenced thet the results of non-destructive and destruc
tive tests are continuous and regularly recorded, in order 10
arrive at statistically based representative documentation for
the assessment of the quality level ofthe individual supplier.
‘The distinc beween destructive ané non-destructive
testing is based on whether it is possible to use the specimens
after testing. Only smal parts of the surfaces are graund off in
hardness testing, which dove aot usually adversaly affect the
usablity of the tested part. The hardness test is therefore
regarded as being a non-destructive test.