Successful Political Marketing: A Punjab Voter's Point of View
Successful Political Marketing: A Punjab Voter's Point of View
such as identification of needs of voters, segmentation of Promotion is one of the most crucial parts of political
voters, planning and execution of different marketing marketing campaign. The promotion mix broadly can be
programs etc. Political advertisement could be one of the divided into two major parts. One is paid promotion which
most expensive and important among all those activities but includes all types of advertisement be it broadcast, print,
it is not the only one. In nutshell it can be concluded that poster, or the flourishing digital marketing. The other type
political marketing is use of marketing tools and techniques is free promotion commonly known as publicity that
by any political setting. political parties get but do not purchase (O’Shaughnessy,
2002).
Further, from marketing point of view a politician or a Usual to commercial market and growingly an important
political party is a service provider and voter/citizen must element of political process, public relation, is an important
be viewed as a customer in political market place. A tool applied to get positive attention of media for the
politician is different from the other service providers organization.
because he operates in a complex environment that includes Party symbols, slogan, colours give an added elements to
both controllable and uncontrollable factors[102]. Secondly the entire communication mix.
he/she plays the role of both campaigner as well as the E. Placement
service provider and thirdly the type and level of The core of distribution or placement is chain of retailers or
communication used in politics are different from the one distributors in case of commercial market. In politics the
used in commercial organizations. identical form is party workers at grass root level. The
political parties can arrange their membership at local or
B. Political marketing mix regional basis. The members of these parties provide
volunteer labour and crucial inputs during the time of
From the literature mentioned previously the political elections[27][31]. In addition this machinery also
marketing can be defined as: coordinates with national level network to liaison local
happenings and visits by leaders of the party. In India, it is
The candidate or political party application environment
very important to keep in mind that family is very important
analysis and opinion research to develop and promote a
that plays a very influential role in the voting process
product /offering which will assist to achieve objectives and
(Farrell and Wortmann, 1987).
satisfy voter’s in return for their support.
The perceptions about “party image” are developed on the Market Orientation in political marketing attracts great
basis of record in office, unity of purpose and recent history interest as it provides likely perspective to win elections.
(Harrop and Shaw, 1990). The most important in building Sometimes this strategy also increases concerns among
party image is policies of the party on which party party members and other stakeholders having huge
manifesto is based. During last 3 decades researchers has investments/ attachments to a specific candidate or party.
started placing more focus on rational choice belief of voter These participants have their own perspectives of framing
judgment of the issues and choosing for the political party policies and may be hesitant in changing party policies as
which is in synchronization with specific policy likings per the research (Lees-Marshment, 2009).
(Himmelweit et al., 1985; Harrop, 1986). Nevertheless the Many researchers (Newman, 1999; Lees-Marshment, 2001;
comprehensive scenario is not simple to change from image Ormrod, 2005) conclude that a market orientation helps
of the political party to issues based clarification of voter’s political party/ politician to be in touch with and reactive e
alternative because leader image also plays an important to voter concerns.
part, which constructs the third element in product mix. Ormod (2005) suggested a theoretical framework of market
Active role played by media has assisted mitigating this orientation based on behavior and attitude. As behavior,
tendency; as quoted by Philip Kotler “Voters hardly meet or Ormod considered behavioral construct regarding
Know the political leaders; they only have transmitted generation of information
images” (Kotler, 1982; O’Shaughnessy, 2002). and its distribution, with
reference from Kohli and
D. Promotion Jaworski (1990) research and
believed them with consistent
external communication and
1811
Published By:
Retrieval Number:F13240476S519/19©BEIESP Blue Eyes Intelligence Engineering
& Sciences Publication
International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering (IJRTE)
ISSN: 2277-3878, Volume-7, Issue-6S5, April 2019
assessing own as well as competitors strengths and A scientifically structured questionnaire based on extensive
weaknesses (Newman, 1999). Positioning is a tool which review of literature and proposed research model was
enables a political developed to find the relationship between dependent and
independent variables. Five point Likert scale was used to
measure each variable. Before the questionnaire was
party/candidate to create and communicate his image to the finalized it was pretested. “Expert” pretest was done with
voters in a best possible way. In order to create a favourable the help of ten academicians having in depth knowledge of
image and increase the support political strategists use the subject area. The questionnaire was modified as per the
ideologies, issues, policies and reasoned arguments and suggestions of experts. After that second pretest comprising
style of presentation to win the voter’s mind. Positioning is 50 respondents similar to the research group was conducted.
related with many things; the internal strengths and To check the reliability the Cronbach’s Alpha was
capabilities of political parties/candidates must be evaluated calculated and found to be .816 which is more than the
and should be matched with opportunities available in the minimum acceptable limit (Nunnally, 1994). This shows
external environment of prospective target segments; and that the consistency between items is adequate and
ultimately, positioning describe the position of researchers can go ahead with the final data collection.
party/candidate in the competition (Mauser, 1983;
Bradshaw, 1995 ; and O’Shaughnessy, 2002). The image of B. Sampling and sampling technique
a candidate/political party is created with the usage of
media by highlighting some personality characteristics of The questionnaire was filled by 350 voters selected from 10
the candidate and stressing various issues which are close to districts of Punjab in the month of April and May 2017 to
the heart of voters (Newman, 1999)[8]. measure their individual perceptions. The questionnaire was
With reference to above discussion, the following translated to the Punjabi language to become more
hypothesis can be framed. understandable. Multistage sampling technique was used to
H4: Political marketing success positively influenced by choose the sample. In the first stage stratified sampling
party/candidate positioning. technique and in the second stage convenience sampling
was used to select the respondents.
K. Image management
The positioning theory for image management was VI. HYPOTHSIS TESTING AND RESULTS
developed by Schoenwald (1987). In the revolutionary
Several tests were performed to examine the suitability of
research on political marketing, Mauser (1983) keeps the
the data for multiple regression. To ensure that no
concept of image at the centre of his work[87].
multicollinearity exists among variables variance inflation
The process of managing image has been applied by the
factor (VIF) was used. To test the tolerance vales for
political parties/candidates to create modified images that
independent variable, tolerance test was used. High degree
more precisely coordinate with their new constituencies. In
of multicollinearity results in inaccurate estimation of
Marketing ideology can be seen as a labeling process
regression coefficients and difficulty in distinguishing the
identical in the nature used for branding the products.
impact of independent variables on the dependent variables
Majority of the people use ideology to label political
(Hair et al., 1998). Any variable with value of VIF above 10
parties/candidates and themselves and then establish a
and with a tolerance value below .10 will be correlated
relation between them and political party/candidate by
more than .90 with other variables, which is indication of
using this information. These labels are same as developed
multicollinearity problem (Hair et al., 1998). Table II have
for the products by marketers to build an image which
the result of multicollinearity test.
describe what they meant for in customers mind (Newman,
1999). Decision on the image of candidate is one of the Table-II
important decisions in political campaigns that dominate
how the organizers of campaign wish people to perceive Variable Tolerance VIF
about the personality of the candidate. Image statement is Market
the base on which political parties/ candidates shape their Orientation 0.634 1.577
Market Research 0.65 1.539
campaigns. Critical is how to change the core message to Market
distinct target groups. On some occasions, voters are Segmentation and
interested in serious discussion on problems, on other Targeting 0.849 1.178
occasions they may want to hear slogans and what they Positioning 0.671 1.491
want to hear (Juholin, 2001). Building and
Managing
With reference to above discussion, the following Favourable and
hypothesis can be framed[32]. Strong Image 0.794 1.26
H5: Political marketing success positively influenced by
building and managing a strong image.
The above table shows that VIF value of all the variables
V. RESEARCH METHODOLOGY range from 1.178 to 1.577
which is less than 10, and
Cross sectional research study used to explain the influence tolerance value ranges from
of independent variables on success of political marketing. .634 to .849 which are
greater than .10. The results
A. Data collection tool clearly show the absence of
The data was also checked for normal distribution with the Table V
help of skewness test. The data is normally distributed if
Hypothesis
t
Beta value Significance Comment
H1: Political
skewness has a value of less than 1. In other words marketing
normality of data is defined as a “range of scores than success
positively
stretches either side of 0” (Hair et al., 1998). Table III influenced by
indicates the result of skewness. application of
market
Table III orientation
strategy. 0.163 2.73 0.007 Accept
H2: Political
Variables Skewness marketing
success
Successful Political Marketing -.322 positively
influenced by
conducting
Market Orientation -.428
efficient
marketing
Market Research -.409 research. 0.191 3.245 0.001 Accept
H3: Political
Market Segmentation and Targeting -.563 marketing
success
positively
Party candidate positioning -.451 influenced by
market
Building and Managing Favourable -.467 segmentation
-
and Strong Image and targeting.
-0.03 0.536 0.592 Reject
H4: Political
The above results clearly indicate that the data is normally marketing
success
distributed as skewness value is less than 1 in case of all the
positively
variables. influenced by
party/candidate
Table IV positioning. 0.07 1.211 0.227 Reject
H5: Political
Fitness of Model for Regressions Analysis marketing
success
Mode R R Adjuste Std. F Significanc positively
l Squar dR Error of e influenced by
e Square the building and
Estimat managing a
e strong image.
0.252 4.718 0 Accept
1 0.4 21. 0
9 0.244 0.233 0.63368 6
1813
Published By:
Retrieval Number:F13240476S519/19©BEIESP Blue Eyes Intelligence Engineering
& Sciences Publication
International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering (IJRTE)
ISSN: 2277-3878, Volume-7, Issue-6S5, April 2019
marketing. This finding is also in line with what parties/candidates and political campaigns are basically used
(Kleinman, 1987; Worcester, 1991; Newman, 1999; by political parties/candidates to make their political
and O’Shaughnessy, 2002) found in their studies. “product” more acceptable to target market.
Results show that people participate in surveys and
opinion polls conducted by political parties before For this political parties should adopt a market oriented
election. approach which involves identifying the target market needs
and design their products as per their needs[15]. Also there is
need to modify their policies according to the changing needs
and wants of the voters. Offerings should be positioned in
3) Market segmentation and targeting do not have such a way that their offering can be identified different from
significant effect on the successful political the competitors. Further political parties/candidates should
marketing. This result is contradictory with earlier adopt relevant tools to attract their target segments. Market
findings (Yorke and Meehan, 1986; Miller et al., segmentation and targeting are beneficial tools to reach
1990; Smith and Saunders, 1990; Newman, 1999; voter’s effectively but somehow political parties/candidates in
Bannon, 2004; Lees-Marshment and Roberts, 2005). Punjab ignore this and people perceive that political
This also means that voters in Punjab do not believe parties/candidate segment the voters and target voters with
that political parties divide voters on geographic, product suitable for each segment. So political parties should
demographic, psychological or behavioral basis. In pay more attention to segment the voters and design specific
addition results was negative (B=-.028) meaning products for each segment. Political parties/candidates should
there by voters do not know or do not understand the use all the opportunities to position in the minds of voters as
meaning of segmentation and targeting voters in Punjab believe that they are week on this aspect.
4) Positioning does not have significant effect on the Further parties/candidates should do their best to build and
successful political marketing. This result is maintain a favourable and strong image in the minds of the
contradictory with earlier findings (Mauser, 1983; voters as it is found that Punjab voters perceive image is a key
Fletcher, 1984; Smith and Saunders, 1990; Newman, element for successful political marketing. As creditability is a
1999; O’Shaughnessy, 2002). It also means that key for successful political marketing, so political
voters in Punjab believe that political parties/candidates should create image of high credibility
parties/candidates do not make efforts to position among the voters.
themselves in the minds of voters[24]. Political
parties must look into it and make all the possible VIII. LIMITATIONS AND FUTURE
efforts to position effectively in the minds of RESEARCH
voters[6].
5) Finally managing and building a strong and There are few possible limitations in the empirical and
favourable image was found to have significant conceptual work reported in this research paper. The
effect on the successful political marketing. This conceptual model (figure 1) mentioned herein was
result is similar to previous studies (Newman, 1999; developed from the literature only and empirical testing has
Juholin, 2001). Voters appear to be very much not been done. This is obviously the next step and
interested in party/candidate image. It was also found qualitative research seems to be the most pertinent way of
that voters feel that candidate/ parties make continues testing and improving the model. For example, focus group
efforts in improving their image basically when research may be used to examine whether the model
citizens are more informed and consider image while includes all the factors affecting successful political
voting in elections[5]. marketing. An identical qualitative approach can be used to
Many factors are there that influence successful examine additional moderating influences on the successful
political marketing as felt by voters in Punjab. In political marketing. For example the role of money and
explaining variance in the dependent variable these muscle power on successful political marketing not
factors are Building and managing a favourable and investigated.
strong image followed by conducting an efficient
Once the model has been fully developed, the influence of
market research and applying a market oriented
independent variables on dependent variable (successful
strategy. On the other hand factors that have not any
political marketing) may be more fully explored. Of the
significant effect on successful political marketing are
specific interest is how political party/candidate can create
market segmentation and targeting and party/candidate
credible image in the minds of voters. Will voters believe
positioning[63].
the efforts to create or change an image as signaled by
leader if the lower level workers and leaders appear largely
VII. DISCUSSION ON FINDINGS
unchanged? This is an issue faced by political parties in
This paper tried to indicate the usefulness of commercial Punjab.In addition, although factors affecting successful
marketing tools political marketing area. A model based on political marketing have been identified, we are not sure
review of literature was used to find out the factors that may about the relative importance
influence the successful political marketing. It has emerged as of these factors in terms of
interdisciplinary approach which involves the application of voting behaviour. For
marketing tools in politics. Political marketing is an example market orientation
instrument that helps to develop favorable political has a great influence on
campaigns. Connecting with the voters is crucial for political party/candidate choice then
image is? Do different
1814 Published By:
Blue Eyes Intelligence Engineering
Retrieval Number:F13240476S519/19©BEIESP & Sciences Publication
Successful Political Marketing: A Punjab Voter’s Point of View
segments of voters have different influencing factors? 19. Henneberg, S.C.M. (2003), Generic Functions of Political
Marketing Management, Working paper series 2003.19,
University of Bath, School of Management.
The identified factors that influence successful political 20. Henneberg, S.C.M. (2004), Political Marketing Theory:
marketing needs to be treated with caution as it applicability Hendiadyoin or Oxymoron,Working paper series 2004.01,
to the wider Indian electoral scene is yet to be proved. As University of Bath School of Management.
such further research to test and replicate the factors is still 21. Himmelweit, H., Humphreys, P. and Jaeger, M. (1985), How
Voters Decide, Open University Press, Milton Keynes.
required. Also bearing in mind wider research 22. Juholin, E. (2001), “Image or substance? Candidate or
campaign? A case of a presidential election campaign in
Finland”, Corporate communication, Vol. 6 No. 3, pp. 1356-
3289.
23. Kavanagh, D. (1995), Election Campaigning: The New
Marketing of Politics, Blackwell, Oxford.
24. Kleinman, P. (1987), “The research market: did psychographics
opportunities, it is not recommended that factors be used win the general election?”,Admap (September), pp. 16-8.
unchanged in other states or countries. 25. Kohli, A. and Jaworski, B. (1990), “Market orientation: the
construct, research propositions, andmanagerial implications”,
Overall the research paper draw attention to just how much Journal of Marketing, Vol. 54 No. 2, pp. 1-18.
is not understood in this area and the scope of further 26. Kolovos, I. and Harris, P. (2005), “Political marketing and
political communication: therelationship revisited”, available at:
research in the areas identified above is huge. Given the http://eprints.otago.ac.nz/32/1/pm-pc.pdf
identified factors influence on voting intention, in future, 27. Kotler, P. (1982), Marketing for Non-Profit Organization, 2nd
more sophisticated research into different factors role in ed., Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
politics is justified. 28. Kotler, P. and Keller, K. (2009), Marketing Management, 13th
ed., Prentice Hall, Upper SaddleRiver, NJ.
29. Lees-Marshment, J. (2001a), Political Marketing and British
REFERENCES Political Parties: The Party’s JustBegun, Manchester University
Press, Manchester.
1. Baines, P.R. and Egan, J. (2001), “Marketing and political 30. Lees-Marshment, J. (2001b), “The marriage of politics and
campaign: mutually exclusive orexclusively mutual”, marketing”, Political Studies, Vol. 49,pp. 692-713.
Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal, Vol. 4 31. Lees-Marshment, J. (2005), “The marketing campaign: the
No. 1,pp. 76-90. British general election of 2005”,
2. Baines, P.R., Harris, P. and Lewis, B.R. (2002), “The political 32. Journal of Marketing Management, Vol. 21 Nos 9/10, pp. 1151-
marketing planning process:improving image and message in 60.
strategic target areas”, Marketing Intelligence & Planning, Vol. 33. Lees-Marshment, J. (2008), “Comprehensive political
20 No. 1, pp. 25-33. marketing: global political parties, strategy
3. Bannon, D.P. (2004), Marketing Segmentation and Political 34. and behavior”, in Sargeant, A. and Wymer, W. (Eds), The
Marketing, Political StudiesAssociation, University of Lincoln, Routledge Companion to Non-Profit Marketing, Chapter 19 i,
4-8 April. Routledge, pp. 316-29.
4. Bradshaw, J. (1995), “Who will vote for you and why: 35. Lees-Marshment, J. (2009), “Marketing after the election: the
designing strategy and theme”, inThurber, J.A. and Nelson, C. potential and limitations of maintain a market orientation in
(Eds), Campaigns and Elections: American Style, West government”, Canadian Journal of Communication, Vol. 34 No.
viewPress, Boulder, CO. 2, pp. 205-27.
5. Brennan, R. and Henneberg, S. (2008), “Does political 36. Lock, A. and Harris, P. (1996), “Political marketing”, European
marketing need the concept of customervalue?”, Marketing Journal of Marketing, Vol. 30Nos 10/11, pp. 14-24.
Intelligence & Planning, Vol. 26 No. 6, pp. 559-72. 37. McCarthy, E.J. (1960), Basic Marketing, Richard D. Irwin,
6. Butler, P. and Collins, B. (1994), “Political marketing: structure Homewood, IL.
and process”, European Journal of Marketing, Vol. 28 No. 1, 38. Maarek, P.J. (1995), Political Communication and
pp. 19-34. Communication, John Libbey, London.
7. Butler, P. and Collins, N. (1996), “Strategic analysis in political 39. Mauser, G.A. (1983), Political Marketing: An Approach to
markets”, European Journal ofMarketing, Vol. 30 Nos 10/11, Campaign Strategy, Praeger,New York, NY.
pp. 19-34. 40. Menon, S.V. (2009), “Political marketing: a conceptual
8. Dean, D. and Croft, R. (2001), “Friends and relations: long- framework”, MPRA Paper No. 12547,Munich University
term approaches to politicalcampaign”, European Journal of Library.
Marketing, Vol. 30 Nos 10/11, pp. 1197-216. 41. Mensah, K. (2007), “Kwane Nkrumah and political marketing:
9. Downs, A. (1957), An Economic Theory of Democracy, Harper locating campaign strategyin modern political campaigning”,
and Row, New York, NY. The Journal of Pan African Studies, Vol. 1 No. 8,pp. 93-113.
10. Dunleavy, P. (1990), Reinventing Parliament: Making the 42. Miller, W., Clarke, H.D., Harrop, M., Leduc, L. and Whiteley,
Commons More Effective Part 2: P.F. (1990), How Voters Change: The 1987 British election
11. Practical Reforms to Make The Commons More Effective, campaign in perspective, Oxford, Clarendon.
Charter 88, London. 43. Newman, B.I. (Ed.) (1999), “A predictive model of voter
12. Farrell, D.M. and Wortmann, M. (1987), “Party strategies in the behaviour: the repositioning of BillClinton, Handbook of
electoral market: political Political Marketing, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, pp. 259-82.
13. marketing in West Germany, Britain and Ireland”, European 44. Newman, B.I. (2001), “Commentory-image-manufacturing in
Journal of Political Research,Vol. 15 No. 3, pp. 297-318. the USA: recent US presidentialelections and beyond”,
14. Fletcher, W. (1984), Commercial Breaks: Insights into European Journal of Marketing, Vol. 35 Nos 9/10, pp. 966-70.
Advertising and Marketing, Advertising 45. Niffenegger, P. (1989), “Strategies for success from political
15. Press, London. marketers”, Journal of ConsumerMarketing, Vol. 6 No. 1, pp.
16. Hair, J., Anderson, R., Tatham, R. and Black, W. (1998), 115-51.
Multivariate Data Analysis, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, 46. O’Cass, A. (1996), “Political marketing concept”, European
NJ. Journal of Marketing, Vol.
17. Harrop, M. (1986), “Voting and the electorate”, in Drucker, H. 30Nos 10/11, pp. 45-61.
et al. (Eds), Developments in British Politics, Macmillan, 47. O’Cass, A. (2001), “Political
London. marketing – an investigation
18. Harrop, M. (1990), “Political marketing”, Parliamentary of the political marketing
Affairs, Vol. 43 No. 3, pp. 277-92. concept andpolitical market
orientation in Australian
politics”, European Journal of
1815
Published By:
Retrieval Number:F13240476S519/19©BEIESP Blue Eyes Intelligence Engineering
& Sciences Publication
International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering (IJRTE)
ISSN: 2277-3878, Volume-7, Issue-6S5, April 2019
Marketing, Vol. 35 Nos 9/10, pp. 1003-25. 74. Hayes, B. and McAllister, I. (1996), “Marketing politics to
48. O’Cass, A. (2002), “Political advertising believability and voters: late deciders in the 1992 British election”, European
information source value duringelections”, Journal of Journal of Marketing, Vol. 30 Nos 10/11, pp. 309-566.
Advertising, Vol. 31 No. 1, pp. 63-74. 75. Hayes, B. and McAllister, L. (2001), “Women, electoral
49. Ormrod, R.P. (2005), “A conceptual model of political market volatility and political outcomes inBritain”, European Journal
orientation”, Journal of Nonprofit & Public Sector Marketing, of Marketing, Vol. 35 Nos 9/10, pp. 971-83.
Vol. 4 Nos 1/2, pp. 47-64. 76. Jackson, N. (2007), “Political parties, the internet and the 2005
50. O’Shaughnessy, N. (2001), “The marketing of political general election: third time lucky?” Internet Research, Vol. 17
marketing”, European Journal ofMarketing, Vol. 35 Nos 9/10, No. 3, pp. 1066-2243.
pp. 1047-57. 77. Kotler, P. and Kotler, N. (1981), “Business marketing for
51. O’Shaughnessy, N. (2002), “Towards an ethical framework for political candidates”, Campaigns andElections (Summer), pp.
political marketing”, Psychologyand Marketing, Vol. 19 No. 24-33.
12, pp. 1079-94. 78. Newman, B.I. and Sheth, J.N. (1984), “The gender gap in voter
52. Osuagwu, L. (2008), “Political marketing: conceptualization, attitudes and behavior: someadvertising implications”, Journal
dimensions and research agenda”,Marketing Intelligence & of Advertising, Vol. 13 No. 3, pp. 4-16.
Planning, Vol. 26 No. 7, pp. 793-810. 79. Newman, B.I. (1994), The Marketing of the President: Political
Marketing as Campaign Strategy, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
80. Peng, N. and Hackley, C. (2007), “Political marketing
53. Qualter, T. (1985), Opinion Control in the Democracies, communications planning in the UK and Taiwan”, Marketing
Hampshire, Boston, MA. Intelligence & Planning, Vol. 25 No. 5, pp. 483-98.
54. Rees, P. and Gardner, H. (2005), “Political marketing 81. Peng, N. and Hackley, C. (2009), “Are voters, consumers?”,
segmentation – the case of UK localgovernment”, Journal of Qualitative Market Research, Vol. 12 No. 2, pp. 171-86.
Nonprofit & Public Sector Marketing, Vol. 4 Nos 1/2, pp. 169- 82. Rothschild, M.L. (1978), “Political Advertising: a neglected
84. policy issue in marketing”, Journal of marketing research, Vol.
55. Scammell, M. (1999), “Political marketing: lessons for political 15 No. 1, pp. 58-71.
science”, Political Studies, Vol. 47 No. 4, pp. 718-39. 83. Stephen, D. and Hughes, A. (2008), “Australian political
56. Schoenwald, M. (1987), “Marketing a political candidate”, marketing after Kevin 07: lessons from the 2007 federal
Journal of Consumer Marketing, Vol. 4, pp. 57-63. election”, Monash Business Review, Vol. 4 No. 1, pp. 34-7.
57. Sekaran, U. (2004), Organizational Behavior: Text and Cases, 84. Waller, S.D. and Polonsky, J.M. (1996), “Advice for handling
2nd ed., Tata McGraw Hill Companies, New Delhi. controversial accounts: from product to politicians”, Marketing
58. Smith, G. and Hirst, A. (2001), “Strategic political era of Intelligence & Planning, Vol. 14 No. 3, pp. 21-8.
political marketing”, European Journal of Marketing, Vol. 35
Nos 9/10, pp. 1058-73.
59. Smith, G. and Saunders, J. (1990), “The application of AUTHORS PROFILE
marketing to British politics”, Journal ofMarketing
Management, Vol. 5 No. 3, pp. 295-306. Krishan Gopal is working as an Assistant Professor at Mittal
60. Thrassou, A., Vrontis, D. and McDonald, M.H.B. (2009), “A School of Business (ACBSP, USA Accredited),
marketing communicationsframework for small political parties Author-1 Lovely Professional University, Punjab. He has 12
in developed countries”, Marketing Intelligence &Planning, Photo years of teaching experience. His expertise entails
Vol. 27 No. 2, pp. 268-92. areas like Political Marketing, Strategic
61. Worcester, R. (1991), British Public Opinion, Blackwell, Management, Business Simulations and Marketing
Oxford, available at: http://EzineArticles.com/875572 Management. He is actively involved in academic
62. Worcester, R.M. and Baines, P.R. (2004), Two Triangulation research.
Models in Political Marketing: TheMarket Positioning
Analogy. Elections on the Horizon Conference, British Library, Dr. Rajesh Verma is working as Professor and
London. Author- Additional Dean at Mittal School of Business
63. Wring, D.P. (1996), “Political marketing and party 2Photo (ACBSP, USA Accredited), Lovely Professional
development in Britain”, European Journal ofMarketing, Vol. University, Punjab. He has 17 years of teaching
30 Nos 10/11, pp. 100-11. experience. His expertise entails areas like
64. Yorke, D. and Meehan, S.A. (1986), “ACORN in the political Marketing Orientation, Business Models, Political
marketplace”, European Journal ofMarketing, Vol. 20 No. 8, Marketing, Marketing Research and Marketing Management and research
pp. 73-86. interests includes critical perspective on application of marketing theory
65. Further readingAndrews, L. (1996), “The relationship of like value creation through innovative and contemporary media.
political marketing to political lobbying”, EuropeanJournal of
Marketing, Vol. 30 Nos 10/11, pp. 76-90. Ajay Chandel is working as an Assistant
66. Bowers-Brown, J. and Gunter, B. (2002), “Political election”, Author- Professor at Mittal School of Business (ACBSP,
Aslib Proceeding, Vol. 54 No. 3,pp. 166-76. 3Photo USA Accredited), Lovely Professional
67. Bowler, S., Domovan, J. and Fernandez, K. (1996), “The University, Punjab He has 10 years of academic
growth of the political marketing experience of teaching Strategy and
68. industry and California initiative process”, European Journal of Branding. He has research interest in areas like
Marketing, Vol. 30 No. 10,pp. 166-78. Strategy, Branding and E-commerce.
69. Butler, P. and Collins, N. (2001), “Payment on delivery –
recognizing constituency service aspolitical marketing”,
European Journal of Marketing, Vol. 35 Nos 9/10, pp. 32-44.
70. Haley, G., Bajaj, M. and Rust, R.T. (1984), “Efficient and
inefficient media for political campaign advertising”, Journal of
Advertising, Vol. 13 No. 3, pp. 45-9.
71. Harris, P. (2001), “Commentory-machiavelli, political
marketing and reinvesting government”,European Journal of
Marketing, Vol. 35 Nos 9/10, pp. 1136-54.
72. Harris, P., Lock, A. and O’Shaughnessy, N. (1999), “Measuring
the effect of political advertising and the case of the 1995 Irish
Divorce Referendum”, Marketing Intelligence & Planning, Vol.
17 No. 6, pp. 272-9.
73. Harris, P. and Ward, M. (2005), “Marketing the mayor: political
marketing and Livingstone4London mayoral election
campaign”, Government and Public Affairs.
1817
Published By:
Retrieval Number:F13240476S519/19©BEIESP Blue Eyes Intelligence Engineering
& Sciences Publication
Successful Political Marketing: A Punjab Voter’s Point of View
1
Published By:
Retrieval Number:F13240476S519/19©BEIESP Blue Eyes Intelligence Engineering
& Sciences Publication