Scribd
Upload
341 views1 page

Jaboneta V Gustilo

The late Macario Jaboneta executed his will with three witnesses present. However, one witness, Isabelo Jena, left the room before the third witness, Julio Javellana, had a chance to sign. The will was denied probate on the grounds that not all witnesses signed in the presence of one another. However, the court ruled that since Jena saw Javellana preparing to sign as he left the room, and the other witnesses confirmed he did sign, all witnesses were together and able to see the signing, fulfilling the legal requirements. The court found it sufficient if witnesses are together and able to see the signing, even if one does not actually witness every signature.

Uploaded by

Gillian Calpito
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
341 views1 page

Jaboneta V Gustilo

The late Macario Jaboneta executed his will with three witnesses present. However, one witness, Isabelo Jena, left the room before the third witness, Julio Javellana, had a chance to sign. The will was denied probate on the grounds that not all witnesses signed in the presence of one another. However, the court ruled that since Jena saw Javellana preparing to sign as he left the room, and the other witnesses confirmed he did sign, all witnesses were together and able to see the signing, fulfilling the legal requirements. The court found it sufficient if witnesses are together and able to see the signing, even if one does not actually witness every signature.

Uploaded by

Gillian Calpito
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 1

Jaboneta v Gustilo

FACTS:
The late Macario Jaboneta executed his will in the presence of Julio
Javellana, Aniceto Jalbuena, and Isabelo Jena as witnesses. They were all
together, and were in the room where Jaboneta was, and were present
when he signed the document, Isabelo Jena signing afterwards as a
witness, at his request, and in his presence and in the presence of the
other two witnesses. Aniceto Jalbuena then signed as a witness in the
presence of the testator, and in the presence of the other two persons
who signed as witnesses. At that moment Isabelo Jena, being in a hurry to
leave, took his hat and left the room. As he was leaving the house Julio
Javellana took the pen in his hand and put himself in position to sign the
will as a witness, but did not sign in the presence of Isabelo Jena; but
nevertheless, after Jena had left the room the said Julio Javellana signed
as a witness in the presence of the testator and of the witness Aniceto
Jalbuena.

Such will by the deceased Macario Jaboneta was denied for


probate on the ground that Julio Javellana, one of the witnesses, did not
attach his signature thereto in the presence of Isabelo Jena, another of
the witnesses, as required by the law.

ISSUE:
Whether or not the testator and the witnesses signed the will in the
presence of one another

HELD:
Yes. The fact that Jena was still in the room when he saw Javellana
moving his hand and pen in the act of affixing his signature to the will,
taken together with the testimony of the remaining witnesses which shows
that Javellana did in fact there and then sign his name to the will,
convinces us that the signature was affixed in the presence of Jena. It was
held that it is sufficient if the witnesses are together for the purpose of
witnessing the execution of the will, and in a position to actually see the
testator write, if they choose to do so. The true test of vision is not whether
the testator actually saw the witness sign, but whether he might have seen
him sign, considering his mental and physical condition and position at
the time of the subscription.

You might also like