SBH Mtech Report
SBH Mtech Report
DISSERTATION ON
Submitted by
DISSERTATION ON
Submitted by
Date:
Place: Lonere, Dist: Raigad. - 402103
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
I take this opportunity to express my profound gratitude and deep regards to my guides
Prof. S. V. Khobragade and Dr. A. B. Nandgaonkar for his exemplary guidance, monitoring
and constant encouragement throughout the course of this thesis. The blessing, help and
guidance given by him from time to time shall carry me a long way in the journey of life on
which I am about to embark. I am also obliged to express a deep sense of gratitude to honorable
Dr. S. L. Nalbalwar, Head of the Department of Electronics and Telecommunication
Engineering for his cordial support and valuable guidance, which helped me in completing this
task through various stages. I want to thank all my teachers for providing a solid background
for my studies and research thereafter. They have been great sources of inspiration to me and I
thank them from the bottom of my heart. I am highly indebted to all staff members of Dr.
Babasaheb Ambedkar Technological University, Lonere for all the valuable suggestions and
information given by them in their respective fields. A special gratitude to our seniors, whose
contribution and guidance in simulation & design helped me a lot to coordinate my project
successfully.
I would like to thank all my friends, especially my M.Tech. Friends who have supported me
throughout these two years of my stay at Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar Technological University,
Lonere through their true friendship and companionship. They also have been a great source of
comfort to me. I owe my deepest thanks to my parents who have always stood by me and guided
me through life, and helped me against all impossible odds. I thank them for their
encouragement, support, and understanding through all these years. Finally, I humbly bow my
head with utmost gratitude before the God Almighty whose unconditional love and support has
made all this possible.
Lonere – Raigad.
ABSTRACT
The aim of this thesis is to design and analysis of the Microstrip Patch Antenna which covers
the full Ultra Wide Band having frequency range from 3.1 to 10.6 GHz. This thesis covers study
of basics and fundamentals of microstrip patch antenna. In this thesis different antenna designs
are proposed for Ultra wideband applications. UWB is a short distance radio communication
technology that can perform high speed communications with speeds of more than
100Mbps modern communication system requires a single antenna to cover several wireless
bands. The UWB systems have received greater attention in indoor and handheld wireless
communication after the allocation of 3.1-10.6 GHz by the Federal Communications
Commission (FCC) for UWB applications. A series of parametric study were done to find that
how the characteristics of the antenna depends on its various geometrical and other parameters.
The various geometrical parameters of the antenna are the dimensions of the patch and ground
planes and the separation between them and it also includes the dielectric constant of the
substrate material. The parametric study also contains the study of different techniques for
optimizing the different parameters of antenna to get the optimum results and performance. The
design and simulation of the antenna is carried out using Ansys HFSS 16.0. Present day
correspondence frameworks require antennas working at more extensive groups with decreased
measurements which are compactable for some remote gadgets. Many plan philosophies are
proposed wherein the utilization of fractals in the outlining of receiving wire gives us
tremendous advantages. The size of radiating patch of hexagonal fractal antenna is
22mmx29mm. This antenna operates on UWB band of 3.1gigahertz to10.6gigahertz. This
antenna creates the fractal geometry inside the patch with similar in shape but different in sizes.
The reception apparatus examined above makes the fractal geometry inside the fix with
comparative fit as a fiddle however distinction in sizes of the hexagon. The comes about exhibit
that the proposed antenna offers great double band frequencies (3.6GHz and 6.4GHz) which is
reasonable for some remote applications. These antennas can be used in wireless ultra wideband
(UWB) communications.
INDEX
LIST OF FIGURE I
LIST OF TABLE III
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS IV
CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION 1
1.1 Overview 1
1.2 Ultra Wideband (UWB) Technology 2
1.3 Objectives. 3
1.4 Literature Review 4
1.5 Thesis Outline 5
CHAPTER 2. FUNDAMENTALS OF ANTENNA 6
2.1 Antenna 6
2.2 Antenna Properties 6
2.2.1 Input Impedance 6
2.2.2 VSWR 7
2.2.3 Gain 7
2.2.4 Radiation Pattern 7
2.2.5 Directivity 8
2.2.6 Polarization 8
2.2.7 Frequency Bandwidth (FBW) 9
2.2.8 Front to Back Ratio (FBR) 9
2.2.9 3 dB Beamwidth (half power beam width, HPBW) 9
2.2.10 Return Loss 10
CHAPTER 3. MICROSTRIP ANTENNA 11
3.1 Introduction to Microstrip patch Antenna 11
3.2 Feeding Methods 13
3.3 Advantages and Disadvantages of Microstrip antenna 19
3.2.1 Advantages 19
3.2.2 Disadvantages 20
3.4 Applications 20 CHAPTER 4. FRACTAL ANTENNA 21
I
Fig. 4.10 Illustration of the first five iterations for Pythagorean tree
fractal 29
Fig. 5.1 Basic Hexagonal Dimensions: Horizontal Radius (h),
Vertical Radius (v), Edge Radius 32
Fig. 5.2 Iterations on monopole patch 33
Fig. 6.1 Monopole (a) Return Loss (b) VSWR(c) Radiation Pattern
2D 36
Fig. 6.2 1st Iteration (a) Return Loss (b) VSWR(c) Radiation Pattern
2D 38
Fig. 6.3 2nd Iteration (a) Return Loss (b) VSWR(c) Radiation Pattern
2D 40
Fig. 6.4 3rd Iteration (a) Return Loss (b) VSWR(c) Radiation Pattern
2D 42
Fig. 6.5 Report of Reflection Coefficient 44
Fig. 6.6 Report of voltage standing waves ratio (VSWR-Fabricated) 45
LIST OF TABLES
II
Table No. Table Title Page No.
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS
III
VSWR Voltage Standing Wave Ratio
SIMO Serial Input Multiple Output
MISO Multiple Input Serial Output
SISO Serial Input Serial Output
TARC Total Active Reflection Coefficient
AUI Antenna Under Test
FBW Frequency Bandwidth
FBR Front To Back Ratio
HPBW Half Power Beam Width
FR-4 Fire Retardant 4
GHz Giga Hertz
MHz Mega Hertz
IV
Tenuous Hexagonal Microstrip Fractal Antenna For UWB Applications
CHAPTER 1
INTRODUCTION
1.1 Overview
In now day’s the wireless system has become a part of human life. Most of the electrical
and electronics equipment around are using the wireless system. An antenna is an essential
element of the wireless system. Antenna is an electrical device which transmits the
electromagnetic waves into the space by converting the electric power given at the input into
the radio waves and at the receiver side the antenna intercepts these radio waves and converts
them back into the electrical power. There are so many systems that uses antenna such as remote
controlled television, cellular phones, satellite communications, spacecraft, radars, wireless
phones and wireless computer networks. Day by day new wireless devices are introducing
which increasing demands of compact antennas. Increase in the satellite communication and
use of antennas in the aircraft and spacecraft has also increased the demands a low profile
antenna that can provide a reliable communication.
A microstrip antenna is one who offers low profile and light weight. It is a wide beam
narrowband antenna can be manufactured easily by the printed circuit technology such as a
metallic layers in a particular shape is bonded on a dielectric substrate which forms a radiating
element and another continuous metallic layer on the other side of substrate as ground plane.
Not only the basic shapes any continuous shape can be used as the radiating patch. Instead of
using dielectric substrate some of the microstrip antennas use dielectric spacers which results
in wider bandwidth but in the cost of less ruggedness. Microstrip antennas are low profile
antenna and mechanical rugged and can be easily mounted on any planar and non-planar
surfaces.
The size of microstrip antenna is related to the wavelength of operation generally λ/2. The
applications of microstrip antennas are above the microwave frequency because below these
frequency the use of microstrip antenna doesn’t make a sense because of the size of
antenna. At frequencies lower than microwave, microstrip patches don't make sense because of
the sizes required. Now a day’s microstrip antenna is used in commercial sectors due to its
inexpensiveness and easy to manufacture benefit by advanced printed circuit technology.
Due to the development and ongoing research in the area of microstrip antenna it is expected
that in future after some time most of the conventional antenna will be replaced by microstrip
antenna due to its innovative features, small size and acceptable cost too.
1.2 Ultra Wideband (UWB) Technology
Ultra-wideband (UWB) technology for communications and radar has been a topic of research
since the early 1960s. However, research and development in this area gained momentum only
in recent years for several reasons. The principal reason is the handiness of high-speed
semiconductor switching device technology. Another reason is that these systems were ratified
for the first time only in 2002 for unlicensed use under the Federal Communications
Commission Part 15 (Title 47 of the Code of Federal Regulations) [FCC. 2002]. The use of
UWB in the range of 3.1 to 10.6 GHz was unlicensed by FCC [15]. This permitted the
unlicensed use of deliberate UWB wireless emissions within restricted frequency bands at very
low power spectral density and is history from the viewpoint of frequency overlay. Finally, as
the wireless spectral bands are getting herded with the development of wireless devices, the
need for high-bandwidth wireless communications is also forcing the development of UWB
communication systems.
UWB is any radio transmitter with a spectrum that engages more than 20% of the center frequency
or a minimum of 500 MHz and that meets the power limits allotted by the regulatory bodies to
minimize the menace to legacy systems. UWB draws gains of broad spectrum in terms of the bit
rates it can handle. By Shannon's theorem, the channel capacity C is given by,
C 1.1
Where, B is the bandwidth and is the signal-to-noise ratio. Range of operation of such systems
d 1.2
d being the distance, Pt the transmitted power and Pr the received power, the above equations
suggests that channel capacity can be increased by increasing bandwidth instead of power.
Thus, UWB has primarily been a high bit, short range system. The advantages, disadvantages
and applications of UWB are listed in Table 1.
1.3 Objectives
The objectives of this thesis are:
• To design a high gain with better return loss multiband antenna having simple geometrical
structure.
• To design and develop multiband compact hexagonal microstrip patch antenna for UWB
applications.
• To investigate and analyze the electrical and geometrical properties of the compact multiband
hexagonal microstrip patch antenna.
• To fabricate the compact multiband hexagonal microstrip patch antenna and test the
performance of the antenna experimentally.
ground plane
Chapter 2: This chapter presents the fundamentals of antenna. It contains introduction of antenna and
antenna properties.
Chapter 3: This chapter deals with the basics of microstrip antennas, the advantages and
disadvantages. The basic geometries, feeding techniques, features and applications of planar
antennas are exemplified here.
Chapter 4: This chapter presents the fractal antenna and its types.
Chapter 5: This chapter describes the design of proposed hexagonal microstrip fractal antenna.
Chapter 6: This chapter presents simulation results using the HFSS software and results of
fabricated antenna using VNA.
Chapter 7: This chapter contains the conclusion and it also describes future scope of the thesis.
CHAPTER 2
FUNDAMENTALS OF ANTENNA
2.1 Antenna
An antenna is defined by Webster’s Dictionary as “a usually metallic device (as a rod or wire)
for radiating or receiving radio waves”. The IEEE Standard Definitions of Terms for Antennas
(IEEE Std. 145–1983) defines the antenna or aerial as “a means for radiating or receiving radio
waves” [16]. Many different structures can act as antennas. Generally, antennas are constructed
out of conducting material of some nature and can be constructed in many shapes and sizes.
The size is related to the wavelength of operation of the antenna. An antenna designed for
operation at 10 kHz is almost always much larger than an antenna designed for operation at 10
GHz.
2.2.2 VSWR
Voltage Standing Wave Ratio (VSWR) is the ratio between the maximum voltage and the
minimum voltage along transmission line. The VSWR, which can derived from the level of
reflected and incident waves, is also an indication of how closely or efficiently an antenna’s
terminal input impedance is matched to the characteristic impedance of the transmission line.
Increasing in VSWR indicates an increase in the mismatch between the antenna and the
transmission line. A decrease VSWR means good matching with minimum VSWR is one. Most
wireless system operates at 50 Ohm impedance. Hence the antenna must be designed with an
impedance as close to 50 ohm as possible. A VSWR of 1 indicate an antenna impedance of
exactly 50 ohms. Mostly, the ratio of VSWR≥1.5:1 is needed for antenna functional.
2.2.3 Gain
The gain of an antenna is essentially a measure of the antenna’s overall efficiency. If an antenna
is 100% efficient, it would have a gain equal to its directivity. There are many factors that affect
and reduce at the overall efficiency of an antenna. Some of the most significant factors that
impact antenna gain include impedance, matching network losses, material losses and random
losses. By considering of all factors, it would appear that the antenna must overcome a lot of
2.2.5 Directivity
Directivity, D, is important parameter that shows the ability of the antenna focusing radiated
energy. Directivity is the ratio of maximum radiated to radiate reference antenna. Reference
antenna usually is an isotropic radiator where the radiated energy are same in all direction and
have directivity of 1. Directivity can be definition as
D = Umax / Uo (2.3)
Where Umax = Maximum radiated energy, Uo = Isotropic radiator radiated energy
2.2.6 Polarization
The polarization of an antenna describes the orientation and sense of the radiated wave’s electric field
vector. There are three types of basic polarization:
FBW = (2.4)
Where f max, f min are the maximum and minimum frequencies. Fo is center frequency.
Wideband or broadband – These antennas cover an octave or two range of frequencies.
FBW = (2.5)
Frequency independent – these antennas cover a ten to one or greater range of frequencies.
Impedance. Since the reflected power from an antenna input port reduces the radiated power,
it is a good practice to minimize return loss for maximizing antenna efficiency. Return loss can
be measured accurately by using a calibrated network analyzer. A comparison of the measured
results with the predicted data can then provide a guideline for how to proceed with the rest of
the design process.
CHAPTER 3
MICROSTRIP ANTENNA
antenna are shown in Figure below The radiating patch may be square, circular, elliptical,
circular ring, ring sector shapes etc. shown in Fig.. Because of ease of fabrication, analysis
and attractive radiation properties the rectangle and circular patches are frequently used.
They are having low cross-polarization radiation. The basic properties of microstrip patch
antennas have been numerously discussed in literature .The different types of radiators are
broadside and end-fire radiator. Broadside radiators have its maximum radiation pattern
directed normal to the patch or axis of the antenna element. The end-fire radiators have its
maximum radiation pattern directed along the axis of the antenna element. The maximum
pattern of the patches is normal to the patch i.e. n in general it acts as broadside radiator. By
properly choosing the mode i.e. field configuration of the excitation under the patch, the
broadside radiator pattern can be achieved. By judicious mode selection, the End-fire radiation
can be achieved. The strip and ground plane are separated by a dielectric sheet as shown in Fig.
3.1(a).
There are varieties of dielectric material that can be used as substrates in microstrip antenna
design with the dielectric constant in the range of 2.2 ≤ εr ≤ 12. For designing an antenna with
good efficiency, larger bandwidth the substrate height should be more and its dielectric
constant should be low, because the low dielectric constant material provides loosely
bounded fields which leads to release the of more radiation s into space, but it costs in increase
of antenna size. While substrate with higher dielectric constants and lower thickness is
used in the applications where tightly bounded fields are required such as waveguides and
microwave circuitry.
( a)
( b) ( c)
Fig 3.1(a) Microstrip Patch Antenna Structure, (b) Analysis of Fringing Field, (c) Coordinal Visualization
But uses of high dielectric constant material will cost in poor efficiency and smaller
bandwidths or greater losses. Various types of shapes that used as a microstrip radiating
patch are shown in figure below. Rectangular and circular are the most widely used shapes.
(a) Square (b) Rectangle (c) Dipole (d) Elliptical (e) Circular
(f) Disk Sector (g) Triangle (h) Circular disk (i) Ring Sector Fig
3.2: Different Shapes of an Antenna Structures
3. Aperture coupling
The microstrip feed line is also a metallic strip has smaller width as compared to that of the
patch. The main advantage of using the microstrip line feed is that it is very easy to manufacture
one can easily fabricate the fed line with the radiating patch on substrate. It is easy to achieve
the impedance matching by feeding at the inset position and also it is very simple to
model. However microstrip feed line suffers from surface waves and spurious feed radiation
especially when a substrate with high thickness is used, also has the narrow bandwidth (typically
2-5%). A microstrip patch antenna using this feed line is shown in figure with its equivalent
circuit in Figures. 3.3(b) and 3.4(b), respectively. In the coaxial-line feeding a hole is made
in the ground plane and substrate through which the core conductor cable is soldered to
the radiating element. While the outer cable of feed line is made connected to the ground
plane. The coaxial probe feed can also easy to fabricate but difficulty arises in drilling the core
conductor in ground plane and substrate and proper soldering required. Coaxial probe feed
has the advantage that a designer can easily get the impedance match by feeding at the
driving point (is a point where antenna impedance is equal to characteristic impedance of
feeding cable usually 50 ohm).
It has low spurious radiation. However, It also has narrow bandwidth and difficult to model. A
typical coax feed and its equivalent circuit is also shown in Figure 3.4(a) and 3.4(b) respectively.
(a) ( b)
(a) (b)
Fig 3.4 (a) Coaxial line feed (b) Electrical Equ. Circuit for coaxial line
These contacting feeding methods microstrip line and probe feed shows asymmetry which
results in generation of the higher order modes. Therefore to avoid this problem, non- contacting
feeding are used. The aperture coupled feed is most difficult to fabricate among four feeding
techniques. But, it is easy to model and having less unwanted radiation. Aperture coupling
having a ground plane sandwiched between two substrates. The slot is made on ground plane
to couple the energy from feed line to patch. Various types of shapes are used in this feed.
Rectangular shape is mostly used of them. Lower substrate has high dielectric 12 material for
tightly bounding the fields. The selection of substrate material plays a major role on antenna
performance. The Upper substrate is responsible for releasing the electromagnetic waves into
space therefore for better radiations low dielectric material is used as upper substrate. While the
lower one supports in coupling the energy from feed line to radiating patch, therefore a thin
substrate with higher dielectric constant is used in the lower substrate.
The amount of energy coupled to radiating patch depends on the slot dimensions and position,
they can be optimize in order to get the maximum coupling optimize. This feed also has low
spurious feed radiation. An antenna using aperture coupled feed with its electrical equivalent
circuit in Fig.3.5 (a) and 3.5(b) respectively. The Proximity coupling has the advantage of
large bandwidth, easy to model and has less unwanted radiation. However it is difficult to
fabricate because of proper alignment of feed line and radiating patch is required. As in aperture
coupled, proximity coupled feed also uses two substrates which are selected in the same manner
as in aperture coupled. Feed line is placed between the substrate and the ground plane is
kept below the lower substrate. Feed line is extended a more as a stub.
There are basically two types of bandwidths, impedance bandwidth, defined as the
bandwidth over which the antenna remains matched to the feed line to some specified level such
as VSWR ≤ 2 and the pattern bandwidth, defined as the bandwidth over which the pattern
remains constant. The ideal broadband element will meet both the standards.
Fig 3.5(a) aperture coupled feed (b) Electrical Equ. Circuit for aperture.
There are different methods to analyze the microstrip antenna. The popular models are
transmission line model, cavity model and full wave model. The simplest model of among all is
transmission line model. It is easy to analyze using this model and it is more accurate
when it employed on thin substrate. The disadvantage of this model is, as it gives less precise
results and lacks in versatility. The transmission line model constitutes the microstrip antenna
by two slots distinguished by a low-impedance transmission line of length L, width W and
height H, as shown in Figure 3.6(a).
Fringing Effects Since the patch dimensions are finite along the length and width, the fields
at the patch edges undergo fringing. This is instanced in Fig.3.1 (a, b) for the two
radiating slots of the microstrip antenna. The amount of fringing fields coming from the
radiating edges mainly depends on the dielectric material used in substrate and the height
of substrate. Lower the dielectric constant material results more bowed fringing fields that leads
to better radiation. Therefore lower the dielectric material constant better the radiation. For a
microstrip line, typical electric field lines are shown in Fig.3.12. It can be observed that the
fringing field line is not only travels in substrate but also in the air. Therefore for the more
accurate prediction of the performance of antenna the air should also take into consideration. As
L/h ratio increases and εr >> 1, the fringing field will more concentrate on the substrate. Due to
these fringing fields coming out from the edges the operating length becomes more than
the physical length. Therefore to consider the fringing effect in patch an antenna, an effective
dielectric constant (EDC) is calculated. The value of εreff is nearer to the value of the actual
dielectric constant used. The effective dielectric constant is a function of frequency. For the
higher frequency the value of effective dielectric constant reaches to the actual value. Effective
dielectric constant will be in the range of 1< εreff < εr. As the frequency of operation increases
the fringing fields disappears, because the electric field lines will concentrate inside the
substrate. The graph showing in figure 3.8. The variation of εreff value with frequency for three
different types of materials.
Fig 3.8 Microstrip Electric field lines and effective dielectric constant
For low frequencies, effective dielectric constant is almost constant. At the intermediate
frequencies its values start to gain slowly and finally approach the values of the actual value of
dielectric constant. The initial values also referred to as static values (at lower frequencies) of
effective dielectric constant is given by Eq. 3.1. This value is sensible for W/h > 1.
Fig 3.9 Effective dielectric constant vs. frequency for different substrates
3.1
3.2
The characteristics impedance Zo of the microstrip feed line depends on the width W of the
feed line and height h of the substrate and it holds different values for W/h ≤ 1 and W/H
≥ 1 as exemplified in the Eqs 3.1 and 3.2 respectively.
3.3
Eq.3.3 The width W of the line and height h of the substrate is decided by parameters A and B which
are functions of the characteristic impedance of the line and dielectric constant of the
3.4
Generally, the characteristics impedance of the feed line is taken as 50Ω. The reason behind choosing
this are described below:
Practically, all source ports that are available having 50Ω internal impedance. Therefore by
Maximum Power Theorem, there is a need to select a feed line of 50Ω characteristic impedance
for the microstrip antenna to transfer maximum power from source to load. Theoretically, it is
determined that 76Ω is required for minimum attenuation in the line and 37Ω is needed for
maximum power transfer from the line. Therefore to compromise between these two, we are
choosing the average of the above two values i.e. 50Ω as the characteristics impedance for
the feed line.
3.3.1 Advantages
• Light weight, low volume, low profile.
Printed circuits are thin, therefore they require less volume than their waveguide or coaxial.
Printed circuits antennas consist primarily of nonmetallic materials like foam materials as substrates,
such antennas have an extremely low weight compared to conventional antennas.
• Polarization
Any polarization can be obtained with the versatility of patch geometries. We can realize multi
polarization capability in antennas with single or multiple ports.
• Excitation technique
Patches allow a various excitation techniques to be employed, compatible with any technology of the
active circuitry and beam forming networks.
d) Medical applications
e) Worldwide Interoperability for Microwave Access (WiMAX)
f) Radio Frequency Identification (RFID)
CHAPTER 4
FRACTAL ANTENNA
4.2 Background
A fractal is a rough or fragmented geometric shape that can be subdivided in parts, each of
which is (at least approximately) a reduced-size copy of the whole. Fractals are generally
selfsimilar and independent of scale. There are many mathematical structures that are fractals;
e.g.
Sierpinski gasket, Cantor‟s comb, von Koch‟s curve. Fractals also describe many real-world
objects, such as clouds, mountains, turbulence, and coastlines that do not correspond to simple
geometric shapes. As we see fractals have been studied for about a hundred years and antennas
have been in use for as long. Fractal antennas are new on the scene. The geometry of the fractal
antenna encourages its study both as a multiband solution and also as a small (physical size)
antenna. First, because one should expect a self-similar antenna (which contains many copies
of itself at several scales) to operate in a similar way at several wavelengths. That is, the antenna
should keep similar radiation parameters through several bands. Second, because the
spacefilling properties of some fractal shapes (the fractal dimension) might allow fractal shaped
small antennas to better take advantage of the small surrounding space.
basic antenna miniaturization techniques can be summarized into lumped element loading,
material loading, and use of ground planes, short circuits, the antenna environment and finally
the antenna geometry. Among these techniques the antenna environment and finally the antenna
geometry optimization and use of ground planes can achieve miniaturization or compactness of
the antenna while maintaining the good antenna performance in terms of bandwidth and
efficiency. However the classical small antennas suffer from inefficient performance. Fractal
geometry provides the solution by designing compact and multiband antennas in a most
efficient and sophisticated way. The general concepts of fractals can be applied to develop
various antenna elements [30]. The properties of these fractal designed antennas allows for
smaller, resonant antennas that are multiband and may be optimized for gain. When antenna
elements or arrays are designed with the concept of self-similarity for most fractals, they can
achieve multiple frequency bands because different parts of the antenna are similar to each other
at different scales. Application of the fractional dimension of fractal structure leads to the gain
optimization of wire antenna and the self-similarity makes it possible to design antennas with
very wideband performance.
which could only be analyzed mathematically, manufacturable [31]. The Hilbert curve is an
example of a space-filling fractal curve that is self-voiding (i.e., has no intersection points).
The first four steps in the construction of the Hilbert curve are shown in Fig. 4.1.
Fractal antennas show multiband or log periodic behavior that has been attributed to selfsimilar
scale factor of the antenna geometry. Fractal loop shows improved impedance and SWR
performance on a reduced physical area when compared to non-fractal Euclidean geometries.
In order to enable more operating bands within lower spectrum, a higher scaling factor is
required. Fractal antenna represents a class of electromagnetic radiators where the overall
structure is comprised of a series of repetition of a single geometry and where repetition is at
different scale.
However some minor differences can be noticed in their performance characteristics. It has
been found that the multi-band nature of the antenna can be transformed into wideband
characteristics by using a very high dielectric constant substrate and suitable absorbing
materials [35].
fractals to the square patch as shown in Fig. 4.9. The antenna feed is through a microstrip line
with a matching section over a semi-elliptical ground plane. The ground plane is selected as a
combination of the rectangular and semi-elliptical shapes in order to obtain an approximately
linear phase variation for the transmission and reception of narrow pulses in UWB systems.
The group delay should be nearly constant across the frequency band [37]. As the iteration of
fractal geometry increases, its resonance frequency decreases, this may lead to an effective
antenna miniaturization. However, for iterations higher than the second iteration, the reduction
of operating frequency is not achievable since the antenna design becomes quite complicated
and its fabrication becomes difficult [38].
Fig. 4.8 Giusepe peano fractal as applied to the edges of the metallic patches
Fig. 4.10 Illustration of the first five iterations for Pythagorean tree fractal
derivation of the radiation patterns for cantor sets distributed currents is presented in [49]. In
paper [50], the authors present an analysis of array elements in a Sierpinski carpet configuration
to create sum and difference patterns. Simple procedure for evaluating the impedance matrix of
the Peano-Gosper fractal array has been presented in [51]. Phased array antennas can be focused
by deploying proper phase excitations on the array elements. Fractal geometry has been applied
to focused arrays.
CHAPTER 5
5.1 Introduction
Fractals are defined by Beniot Mandelbrot as structures whose dimensions are not whole
numbers. These structures are occurring in and around us in nature. Some of the natural
fractals are flowers, branching of leaves and plants. Fractals have two common properties
irrespective of its structure they are (1) self-similarity and (2) space filling [6].By using the
fractal geometry in the design of antennas, antenna with reduced size and antenna with
multiband resonance is achieved. Fractals also have an attractive feature of infinite perimeter
[11].Ultra-wideband (UWB) wireless communication technique which is suitable for short
range wireless systems. UWB is an emerging technology which is used in academia, industry
and research [8]. UWB technology offers numerous advantages like low transmission power,
higher data rate, and ability to work in low SNR, resistance to jamming, immune to multipath
propagation [1] .Federal Council Commission (FCC) allotted the bandwidth 3.1GHz to
10.6Hz and named this spectrum as UWB frequency band. UWB technology finds its
application in Ground Penetrating Radar systems, wall-imaging systems, communication
systems measurement systems, automotive collision avoidance system and radar level
gauges [12]. Coplanar Waveguide (CPW) is used to power the antenna [3].This feeding
mechanism provides immense advantages over conventional microstrip line feed. Some of
the merits of CPW are shorter power delivery paths causing low inductance, structural
strength, thermal cooling, layout density, minimum cross talk and excellent isolation [2].
This hexagonal shaped microstrip fractal antenna which operates on UWB frequencies. The
radiating patch consists of a total of 44 hexagons within the monopole hexagon [1] [14]. To
match the input impedance and output impedance a two-step feed configuration is used. A
monopole hexagonal patch is first designed, simulated and results are analyzed then fractals
are introduced within the monopole hexagonal patch.
Fig. 5.1.Basic Hexagonal Dimensions: Horizontal Radius (h), Vertical Radius (v), Edge Radius
A Hexagonal Shaped Monopole patch is designed and it is depicted in Fig.5.2. (a). A Co-Planer
Waveguide feed mechanism is used to feed the antenna. The patch consists of a hexagon and
input is fed through of its edges through CPW mechanism [5]. Polyamide substrate is used as a
substrate of thickness 1.6mm. Dielectric constant of substrate is 4.4 and the relative
permeability is 1 [1].The monopole patch has basic dimensions namely horizontal radius (h),
vertical radius (v) and edge radius (e). For the transformation of monopole patch into fractal
three different dimensions of hexagons are designed and they are subtracted from the monopole
patch. As mentioned above three important dimensions are defined namely vertical radius,
horizontal radius and edge radius. For monopole patch the dimensions are horizontal radius (h)
=10.3mm, vertical radius (v) =13.7 mm and edge radius (e) =13.7 mm. Then one edge of the
hexagonal patch is chosen and CPW feed is given and the antenna radiates. The results of the
antenna are analyzed and fractals are introduced in the patch [4]. The first level fractal of a big
hexagon is made at the center of the patch because the current distribution is very less at the
center of the radiating patch. The big fractal hexagon has the parameters of horizontal radius
(h1) =3.096mm, vertical radius (v1) =3.73 mm and edge radius (e1) =3.73 mm. Then six
hexagons of medium dimensions of horizontal radius (h2) = 1.365mm, vertical radius (v2)
=1.577 mm and edge radius (e2) = 1.577 mm are subtracted from the monopole patch and these
are placed on all the sides of the biggest hexagonal cut made earlier from the monopole patch.
In a similar fashion the next fractal structures of very smaller dimensions of horizontal radius
(h3) = 0.454mm, vertical radius (v2) =0.525 mm and edge radius (e2) = 0.525 mm are
subtracted from the monopole patch [12]. After performing all the subtractions of 44 hexagons,
a new hexagonal shaped fractal antenna is formed as shown in Fig.5.2.
(i) (ii)
(iii) ( iv)
Fig.2. Iterations on
Fig.5.2 (a) shows a monopole patch in which one of its edges is selected to give the feed for
the antenna [1].For the first iteration a big hexagon of above specified dimension is designed
and it is subtracted from the monopole patch which is depicted in Fig.5.2 (b). For the second
iteration hexagons of medium dimensions are designed and subtracted from the first iterated
fractal, this is depicted in Fig.5.2(c). For the third iteration smaller hexagons are designed
around the four sides of medium hexagon and it is subtracted from the second iterated fractal,
it is depicted in Fig.5.2 (d).
5.3 Calculations
Input Parameters-
Width
W= = 29.44mm
Ɛreff =
Resonant length
Length Extension =
∆L = 0.412 h = 0.735 mm
Length =
(a)
(b)
(c)
Fig. 6.1. Monopole (a) Return Loss (b) VSWR(c) Radiation Pattern 2D
Fig.6.1 (a) shows the return loss of monopole. The parameter return loss is a figure of merit that
mathematically describes the impedance matching between transmission line and antenna. This
transfers happens only when characteristic impedance is matched with input impedance of
antenna otherwise reflected waves are generated which results in the degraded performance of
an antenna. Ideally reflected waves must be zero. In this iteration gives good impedance
matching at 9.6 GHz with return loss of -29.49 dB for X band application, 5.9 GHz with return
loss of -22.95 dB for C band application, 7.8 GHz with return loss of -21.59 dB for C band
application, 6.8 GHz with return loss of -16.10 dB for C band application, 3.5 GHz with return
loss of -14.98 dB for Wi-MAX, 5.1 GHz with return loss of -11.45 dB for WLAN.
Reflected waves are responsible for VSWR. It’s worthy to note that at the particular frequencies
the VSWR plot goes below 2 which essentially mean the S11 plot goes beyond -10 dB levels
at those points. The VSWR plot is well below 2 at 3.5 GHz, 6.8 GHz, 5.1 GHz, 5.9 GHz, 7.8
GHz and 9.6 GHz frequencies. The VSWR plot for the proposed geometry is shown in fig.6.1
(b).
The term radiation pattern is otherwise called as far-field pattern (farthest region away from
antenna, irrespective of the distance). The distribution of field and power are independent of
distance. It refers to the angular (directional) dependence of the strength of radio waves from
the antenna (power radiated from the antenna). The polar plot of far-field at central operating
frequency at 6.5 GHz is shown in fig. 6.1(c).
(a)
(b)
(c)
Fig. 6.2. 1st Iteration (a) Return Loss (b) VSWR(c) Radiation Pattern 2D
In this iteration gives good impedance matching at 5.9 GHz with return loss of -20.43 dB for C
band application, 6.7 GHz with return loss of -21.89 dB for C band application, 7.01 GHz with
return loss of -13.99 dB for C band application, 7.8 GHz with return loss of -25.30 dB for C
band application, 9.8 GHz with return loss of -11.37 dB for X band application, 10.3 GHz with
return loss of -11.09 dB for X band application shown in fig.6.2 (a).
The VSWR plot is well below 2 at 5.9 GHz, 6.7 GHz, 7.01 GHz, 10.3 GHz, 7.8 GHz and 9.8 GHz
frequencies. The VSWR plot for the proposed geometry is shown in fig.6.2 (b).
The polar plot of far-field at central operating frequency at 6.5 GHz is shown in fig. 6.2 (c).
(a)
(b)
(c)
Fig. 6.3. 2nd Iteration (a) Return Loss (b) VSWR(c) Radiation Pattern 2D
In this iteration gives good impedance matching at 9.2 GHz with return loss of -42.54 dB for X
band application, 5.8 GHz with return loss of -25.59 dB for Wi-MAX, 6.6 GHz with return loss
of -23.63 dB for C band application, 7.05 GHz with return loss of -18.57 dB for C band
application, 7.7 GHz with return loss of -20.81 dB for C band application, 8.8 GHz with return
loss of -15.30 dB for X band application shown in fig.6.3 (a).
The VSWR plot is well below 2 at 5.8 GHz, 6.6 GHz, 7.05 GHz, 7.7 GHz, 8.8 GHz and 9.2 GHz
frequencies. The VSWR plot for the proposed geometry is shown in fig.6.3 (b).
The polar plot of far-field at central operating frequency at 6.5 GHz is shown in fig. 6.3 (c).
(a)
(b)
(c)
Fig. 6.4. 3rd Iteration (a) Return Loss (b) VSWR(c) Radiation Pattern 2D
In this iteration gives good impedance matching at 5.8 GHz with return loss of -22.19 dB for
Wi-MAX, 6.6 GHz with return loss of -17.18 dB for C band application, 7.01 GHz with return
loss of -12.9 dB for C band application, 7.7 GHz with return loss of -15.98 dB for C band
application, 8.8 GHz with return loss of -20.32 dB for X band application, 9.1 GHz with return
loss of -20.54 dB for X band application 10.1 GHz with return loss of -11.80 dB for X band
application shown in fig.6.4 (a).
The VSWR plot is well below 2 at 5.8 GHz, 6.6 GHz, 7.01 GHz, 10.1 GHz, 9.1 GHz, 7.7 GHz and
8.8 GHz frequencies. The VSWR plot for the proposed geometry is shown in fig.6.4 (b).
The polar plot of far-field at central operating frequency at 6.5 GHz is shown in fig. 6.4 (c).
Antenna design is fabricated using PCB Prototyping machine and it is tested using vector
network analyzer (VNA). VNA is one of the most essential RF and microwave measurement
approaches. A network analyzer is an instrument that measures the network parameters of
electrical networks. Today, network analyzers commonly measures S-parameters because
reflection and transmission of electrical networks are easy to measure at high frequencies, but
there are other network parameter sets as Y-parameters, Z-parameters and H-parameters.
(a) (b)
Fig. 6.9 (a) Fabricated top view design of hexagonal patch (b) Fabricated bottom view design of hexagonal patch
An SMA connector 5.1, which is a coaxial RF connector, was used due to its excellent frequency
response from DC up to 18 GHz. However, there are some customized versions of this
connector that are rated as high as 26.5 GHz. SMA (Sub Miniature version A) connectors are
semi-precision coaxial RF connectors developed in the 1960s as a minimal connector interface
for coaxial cable with a screw-type coupling mechanism. After fabrication of antenna for the
feeding of input signal SMA connector is connected to the patch. Female type SMA connector
is shown in figure.
CHAPTER 7
7.1 Conclusion
This Work demonstrates the outline of hexagonal molded monopole fractal antenna where littler
components are subtracted from the monopole fix to get the fractal geometry. It is appropriate
for UWB recurrence of around 3.1GHz to 10.6GHz with not exactly - 5dB in the whole band.
Main concern of the thesis is to study of multiband patch antenna using different techniques
and frequency ratio of the microstrip antenna.
As the very less copper portion from patch is etched out which helps to achieve the high gain
of the antenna to use it for satellite application. The simulated results and measured results are
matched well up to great extent.
REFERENCES
[1] Kailas KantilalSawant, Dr. C.R. Suthikshn Kumar, “CPW Fed Hexagonal Micro
[2] Jacob Abraham, Thomaskutty Mathew, “David Fractal Antenna for Multiband
Wireless Communication”, International Conference on Electronic Design, pp15-19,
2014.
[8] Leonardo Lizzi, Andrea Massa, “Dual-Band Printed Fractal Monopole Antenna for Lte
Applications”, IEEE Antennas And Wireless Propagation Letters, Vol. 10, 2011.
[9] Norzaniza AT, Matin MA. “Design of microstrip UWB antenna with band notch
characteristics”, in IEEE Explore 2013.
[10] Yoon J, Kim D, Park C. “Implementation of UWB antenna with band pass
filterusingmicrostrip to CPW transition matching”, in IEEE Explore, Korea. 2009.
[11] Gautam AK, Swati Y, Binod K. “An inverted L-strip UWB microstrip antenna”, in IEEE
Explore 2013.
[13] Yasser MM. “Bandwidth enhancement of compact UWB microstrip patch antennausing
EBG structures”, in IEEE Explore 2013.
[15] Jing -YaDeng, Li-Xin Guo,and X iang -Long Liu, “An Ultra wideband MIMO Antenna
With a High Isolation” IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation
PUBLICATIONS