0 ratings0% found this document useful (0 votes) 143 views5 pagesOCA Circular No. 36 2018 PDF
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content,
claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
Republic of the Philippines:
Supreme Court
fice of the Court Administrator
Manila
OCA CIRCULAR NO, 36-2018 _
TO : ALL PRESIDING JUSTICES AND CLERKS OF
COURT OF THE COURT OF APPEALS,
SANDIGANBAYAN, AND COURT OF TAX
APPEALS, AND JUDGES AND CLERKS
OF COURT/ACCOUNTABLE OFFICERS OF
THE FIRST AND SECOND LEVEL COURTS
SUBJECT : COURT RESOLUTION DATED 10 JANUARY
2018 (ADMINISTRATIVE ADJUSTMENTS ON
LEGAL FEES)
In its Resolution dated 10 January 2018 in A.M. No. 17-
12-09-SC (Re: Initial Recommendations on Administrative
Adjustments from the Judiciary-Wide Committee on Legal Fees}, the
Court En Banc RESOLVED to APPROVE the administrative
adjustments on legal fees for consistency, the full text of which is
appended herein as Annex “A”
For your information, guidance and strict compliance.
February 26, 2018
Map
ea) amas P. MARQUEZ
ourt AdministratorAnnex “A”
Mepublic of the Philippines
Supreme Court
fllanila
EN BANC
NOTICE
Sir/Mesdames:
Please take notice that the Court en bane issued a Resolution
dated JANUARY 10, 2018, which reads as follows.
“A.M. No. 17-1: O9-SC (Re: Initial Recommendations on
Administrative Adjustments from the Judiciary-Wide Committee on Legal
fees),- The Court Resolved, upon the recommendation of the Judici
Wide Committee on Legal Fees, to APPROVE the following
administrative adjustments for consistency:
(@) _ For the Supreme Court (SC), Court of Appeals
(CA), Sandiganbayan (SB), Court of Tax Appeals (CTA), and
the Lower Courts (LCs) —
@__ Appeal fees should be collected in all
actions and proceedings, civil and criminal
[Section 8(0, Rule 141], unless otherwise
exempted. ‘Thus, the appeal fees should be paid
to the court that rendered the decision being
appealed;
Gi) It must be clarified that the Sheriff's
Trust Fund (STF) is not part of the filing fees. As
such, there is a need to collect the said amount
from those who are listed as exempted from the
Payment of filing fees. In this regard, the One
Thousand Pesos (21,000.00) STF should also be
collected from government agencies and from
those exempt from the payment of filing fees,
Further, the use of the STF is not limited to
sheriffs but actually involve process servers and
those court personnel designated to serve notices,
subpoenas and other court processes;
Gil) For those cases with application for
temporary restraining orders (TRO)/writs of
preliminary injunction (WPI), an additional
perNotice of Resolut? ‘ -2- M. No. 17-12-09-SC
January 10, 2018
amount of Three Hundred Pesos (P00.00)
should be collected [Section 10(d), Rule 141];
(iv) Manager's checks/cashier’s checks
are acceptable forms of payment of filing fees
provided that separate checks shall be payable for
each fund, such as for the Judiciary Development
Fund (JDF), and Special Allowance for the
Judiciary Fund (SAJF).
Personal or corporate checks may be
accepted as payment of filing fees provided that
the amount does not exceed Fifty Thousand Pesos
(P50,000.00), except for the SC [Section 4, Rule
VI, Part II, Internal Rules of the SC, A.M. No. 10-
4-20-8C, May 4, 2010, as amended] and CA
[Section 6, Rule VITI, 2009 Internal Rules of the
Court of Appeals].
With respect to the payments for the
Mediation Fund (MF), Victim's Compensation
Fund (VCF), Legal Research Fund (LRE), STF and,
such other fees not accruing to the JDF and SAJF,
only cash payments will be accepted. [SC En Bane
Resolution dated April 17, 2007 in A.M, No. 04-
02-04-SC, as amended];
(v) The use of Postal Money Orders
(PMOs) as a form of payment of filing fees shall
not be acceptable for LCs. However, PMOs are
allowed to be used by the LCs for purposes only of
remittance of collections to the SC.
For the SC, CA, SB and CTA, PMOs shalll be
allowed as an acceptable form of payment of filing
fees and other related fees; and
(vi) The filing fees paid in petitions or
counter-petitions to confirm or enforce, vacate or
set aside an arbitral award or for the enforcement
of a mediated settlement agreement under Rule
20.1 of A.M. No. 07-11-08-SC should be divided
equally between and deposited to the JDF and
SAJF accounts.
(b) For the CA:
Gi) The deposits for costs and sheriff's
fees should be deposited to the Trust Fund of the
CA.
(©) Forthe CTA: yer
weeNotive of Resolution -3- AM. No. 17-12-09-SC
January 10,2018
@ The CTA, either cognizable by the En
Bane or any of its Divisions, should collect the
1,000.00 mediation fee in applicable cases;
Gi) The CYA should include the
summons fees in the computation of the LRF;
Gii) In cases of revival of judgments, they
should be treated as new Cases and the
corresponding fees should then be collected based
on the amount of the judgment,
(@)__ For the LCs (first and second level courts):
@ The computation of fees for small
claims cases should be based on Section 8(a) and
(A), Rule 141, as the case may be;
Gi) As civil claims are automatically
instituted in Estafa and violations of Batas
Pambansa Bilang 22 cases, the courts should also
collect STF.
‘The STF to be collected should be based on
the number of accused provided that for multiple
cases these should have been consolidated;
Gii) For provisional remedies, a motion
fee of 2250.00 should be collected in the 1% level
courts and 2500.00 in the 2" level courts
[Sections 7(m) and 8(e), Rule 141];
(iv) In cases of adoption of minors, where
there are two (2) persons/minors to be adopted,
the assessment of filing fees should be per
child/minor [Seetion 7(£)(0, Rule 141);
(v)_ The filing fees collected for newly-
filed petitions for liquidation of insolvent juridical
and individual debtors under the Financial
Rehabilitation and Insolvency Act (PRIA) should
be allocated equally between the SAJF and JDF
accounts {For financial rehabilitation, [Section 21
(@,, Rule 141}; for insolvency, [Section 7, Rule
14i}; and
(vi) In cases of compulsory confinement
(involuntary submission for rehabilitation) of a
drug dependent, 2300.00 per individual should a
geNotice of Resolu’ “1 -4-
ALM, INO. 1/-12-09-5U
January 10, 2018,
be collected as docket fee [Section 21(i), Rule
aqt].” (advg2)
Court Administrator
0M, JOSE MIDAS P. MARQUEZ (x)
Depfity Court Administrators
HON, JENNY LIND R, ALDECOA-DELORINO (¥)
HON. THELMA C. BAHIA (x)
Supreme Court
HON. RAUL B. VILLANUEVA (x)
Deputy Court Administrator and Chairperson
Judiciary-Wide Committee on Legal Fees
Supreme Court
ATTY, BASILIAT, RINGOL (x)
Chief, Judicial Reoords Office and Member
-Judiciary-Wide Committee on Legal Fees
Supreme Court
THE OFFICER-IN-CHARGE (x)
‘Docket Receiving Section
Judicial Records Office
‘Supreme Court
THE OFFICER-N-CHARGE (7)
Cashier Division, FMBO
Supreme Court
AM.No, 17-12.09-SC
wmd 11018 (adva2) 11818
Very truly yours,
"apieleton fea
[A
Clerk of Court
HON. ROMEO F. BARZA (x)
Presing Justice
Court of Appeals, Manila
HON. ROMAN G, DEL ROSARIO (reg)
Presiding Justice
Court of Tax Appeals
National Government Center
Agham Road, Diliman
1128 Quezon City
HON, AMPARO CABOTAJE-TANG (reg)
Presiding Justice
Sandiganbayan
Sandiganbayan Centennial Building
Commonwealth Avenue, Diliman
‘121 Quezon City
"For crcularization