1) Walmart adopts HR practices that aim to reduce costs in line with its low-cost strategy, such as recruiting children and those with disabilities who can be paid less, extensive training to control employee behavior and prevent losses, and aggressively cutting compensation costs.
2) While these HR policies help Walmart achieve its low-cost goals, they have also led to lawsuits alleging discrimination and violations of labor laws.
3) The document discusses whether Walmart's HR practices that prioritize cost cutting above all else can truly be considered the most "fit" approach or just an aggressive means to an end.
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0 ratings0% found this document useful (0 votes)
283 views2 pages
Walmart Case Study
1) Walmart adopts HR practices that aim to reduce costs in line with its low-cost strategy, such as recruiting children and those with disabilities who can be paid less, extensive training to control employee behavior and prevent losses, and aggressively cutting compensation costs.
2) While these HR policies help Walmart achieve its low-cost goals, they have also led to lawsuits alleging discrimination and violations of labor laws.
3) The document discusses whether Walmart's HR practices that prioritize cost cutting above all else can truly be considered the most "fit" approach or just an aggressive means to an end.
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2
Work on the following case study.
The basic premise that underlying strategic HRM is that organizations
adopting a particular strategy require HR practices that are different from those required by organizations adopting alternative strategies (Jackson&Schuler, 1995). Generally, there are three Strategic HRM theoretical models in the study of this discipline: the universalistic best practices, the contingency perspective of best ft and the resource- based confguration perspective. Here the writer would not deliberate on all these three models to examine the HR practices at Walmart, but just choose the contingency perspective of best ft . With this view, the individual HR practices will be selected based on the contingency of the specifc context of a company. Like the Walmart has different corporate strategy with those retailers with differentiation strategy, which actually cultivates the primary contingency factor in the SHRM literature. Whats more, we should be reminded that the individual HR practices will interact with frm strategy to result in organizational performance, and just for this interaction effects make the universal best practices may not apply so well in a specifc company. As there are the HR policies and activities (such as how the company recruits, selects, and trains and rewards employees) that comprise the HR system itself, here we could illustrate the integration just by the sequence of the HR activities. From the recruitment Walmart has tried its best to reduce the cost considering so big number of its employees. For example, the New York Times (January 2004) reported on an internal Walmart audit which found extensive violations of child-labor laws and state regulations requiring time for breaks and meals. The cheap price of children labors and minors make it earn more cost competitive advantage over other companies. Walmart also faced a barrage of lawsuits alleging that the company discriminates against workers with disabilities, for the recruitment of these guys means providing more facilities for them and the lost of efficiency to some extent.
From training perspective, Walmart refers to its employees as
associates, and encourages managers to think of themselves as servant leaders, that is, to encourage them to serve others while staying focused on achieving results in line with the organization s values and integrity. An organizations strategy necessitates behavioral requirement for success, and the use of HR practices in the organization can reward and control employee behavior, therefore the organization should implement HR practices that encourage the employee behaviors that are consistent with the organization s strategy (Delery, John E; Doty, D Harold, 1996). Through this training and encouragement, Walmart tried to adjust the employee behaviors and competencies to what the companys strategy requires, that is to low down cost more. This logic also is embodied in its lock-in of its night time shift in various stores. Through this enforced policy, Walmart tried to prevent shrinkage behavior of its employees, to eliminate unauthorized cigarette breaks or quick trips home.
From the performance management perspective, Walmart made very
high demanding standards and job designs. The New York Times reported Walmart had extensive violations of state regulations requiring time for breaks and meals. And there are so many instances of minors working too late, during school hours, or for too many hours in a day, for the performance appraising just force them to do so. In the Career management, Walmart also goes great lengths to reduce cost, there are many cases that women sued Walmart for its discriminated policy against women by systematically denying them promotions and paying them less than men. Women are pushed into female departments and are demoted if they complain about unequal treatment just for more cost reduction against its competitors.
From the compensation management perspective, Walmart has also
showed very aggressive HR policies and activities to ft the low-cost strategy. Walmart imported $15 billion worth of goods from china, not only for the strategic consideration of supplier chain economy, but also Walmart has some factories in china, whose products are branded with Walmart name. With this method, Walmart pays much less to Chinese labors in this world-factory and earn some advantages, so we could just see how the Walmart corporate strategy is just intensely integrated with its HR policy. In 2002, operating costs for Walmart were just 16.6 percent of total sales, compared to a 20.7 average for the retail industry as a whole, which supported greatly the overall strategy. Walmart workers in California earn on average 31 percent less than workers employed in large retail as a whole. Actually, with other operating and inventory costs set by higher level management, store managers must turn to wages to increase profts, and Walmart expects the labor costs to be cut by two-tenths of a percentage point each year. Required: A) What lessons do we learn from Walmart training, recruitment and compensation strategy? B) Do you think these aggressive HR polices, are just the most fttest? Explain?