0% found this document useful (0 votes)
74 views2 pages

Writ..... Types of Writ

The document discusses the different types of writs in India that can be issued by courts under the Constitution. There are five main types of writs - habeas corpus, mandamus, prohibition, certiorari, and quo-warranto. Habeas corpus orders the production of a detained person, mandamus commands a public duty to be performed, prohibition forbids lower courts from overstepping powers, certiorari transfers cases between courts, and quo-warranto ousts unlawful holders of public office. The writs are a remedy for violations of fundamental rights and other constitutional breaches.

Uploaded by

Kashif Mehmood
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
74 views2 pages

Writ..... Types of Writ

The document discusses the different types of writs in India that can be issued by courts under the Constitution. There are five main types of writs - habeas corpus, mandamus, prohibition, certiorari, and quo-warranto. Habeas corpus orders the production of a detained person, mandamus commands a public duty to be performed, prohibition forbids lower courts from overstepping powers, certiorari transfers cases between courts, and quo-warranto ousts unlawful holders of public office. The writs are a remedy for violations of fundamental rights and other constitutional breaches.

Uploaded by

Kashif Mehmood
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

Writ.....

types of writ

1. 1. WRIT – TYPES OFWRITByHaxan Sher


2. 2. WritGeneral Meaning - a formal order inWriting issued under seal, in the nameof a
sovereign, government, Court orother authority, commanding an officeror other person to
whom it is issued,to do or refrain from doing some actspecified therein.
3. 3. Constitutional RemedyUnder the Indian Constitution,Supreme Court and High Court
areempowered to issue writs, for theenforcement of fundamental rights.Article 32 -
Supreme CourtArticle 226 – High Court
4. 4. Article 32 - Constitution of IndiaIt grants an extensive originaljurisdiction to the
Supreme Court inregard to enforcement of FundamentalRight.
5. 5. Article 226 - Constitution of IndiaIt can be exercised not only for theenforcement of
fundamental right butfor any other purpose.Jurisdiction is wide and extends
toFundamental rights and otherconstitutional rights.
6. 6. Types of WritHabeas corpusMandamusProhibitionCertiorariQuo-warranto
7. 7. Writ of Habeas corpusHabeas Corpus means, “you may have thebody."A person,
when arrested, can move theCourt for the issue of Habeas Corpus. It isan order by a
Court to the detainingauthority to produce the arrested personbefore it so that it may
examine whether theperson has been detained lawfully orotherwise. If the Court is
convinced that theperson is illegally detained, it can issueorders for his release.
8. 8. Who can apply?General rule is that an application canbe made by a person who is
illegallydetained. But in certain cases, anapplication of habeas corpus can bemade by any
person on behalf of theprisoner, i.e., a friend or a relation.
9. 9. CASE STUDYSunil Batra Vs. Delhi Administrationand Ors. etcThe Supreme Court
enlarged thescope of habeas corpus, makingavailable the fundamental rights of
theprisoners
10. 10. Writ of MandamusMandamus is a Latin word, which means"We
Command".Mandamus is an order from a superior courtto a lower court or tribunal or
publicauthority to perform an act, which fallswithin its duty.Simply, it is a writ issued to
a public officialto do a thing which is a part of his officialduty, but, which, he has failed
to do, so far.This writ cannot be claimed as a matter ofright. It is the discretionary power
of a courtto issue such writs.
11. 11. CASE STUDYBarada Kanta VS. State of WestBengalIn this case, writ of
mandamus doesnot lie against a private individual orany private organisation because
theyare not entrusted with a public duty.
12. 12. Writ of ProhibitionWrit of prohibition means to forbid or to stopand it is popularly
known as Stay Order.This writ is issued when a lower court or abody tries to transgress
the limits or powersvested in it.It is a writ issued by a superior court tolower court or a
tribunal forbidding it toperform an act outside its jurisdiction. Afterthe issue of this writ,
proceedings in thelower court etc. come to a stop.
13. 13. Case StudyS. Govinda Menon VS. Union of IndiaThe writ is issued in both cases
wherethere is excess of jurisdiction andwhere there is absence of jurisdiction.
14. 14. Writ of CertiorariLiterally, Certiorari means to becertified.The writ of certiorari is
issued by theSupreme Court to some inferior courtor tribunal to transfer the matter to it
orto some other superior authority forproper consideration.
15. 15. Case StudyHari Vishnu VS. Ahmad IshaqueThe writ is issued for correcting anerror
of law apparent on the face ofrecords. It cannot be issued to correctan error of fact.
16. 16. Case StudyMadan Gopal VS. Union of IndiaApply both Prohibition and Certiorari
-Prohibition to prevent the court toproceed further with the case andCertiorari for
quashing what hadalready been decided.
17. 17. Writ of Quo-WarrantoThe word Quo-Warranto literally means “onwhat authority
one is holding the publicoffice"It is a writ issued with a view to restraining aperson
from acting in a public office towhich he is not entitled.For example, a person of 62
years hasbeen appointed to fill a public officewhereas the retirement age is 60 years.Now,
the appropriate High Court has a rightto issue a writ of quo-warranto against theperson
and declare the office vacant.
18. 18. ExampleFor example, a person of 62 yearshas been appointed to fill a publicoffice
whereas the retirement age is60 years. Now, the appropriate HighCourt has a right to
issue a Writ ofquo-warranto against the person anddeclare the office vacant.
19. 19. Case StudyBaij VS. State of U.P.,Where the holder of an office hasbeen continuing
in office for a longtime and there is no complaint againsthim the court refused the writ as
itwould have been vexatious

You might also like