Results and Discussion
This chapter result and the findings of the study, which answered the question based on
the data gathered.
A. Results
In the first graph illustrate the number population that uses the internet per country in
ASEAN shown in a bar graph and it shows that the Philippines rank the highest from the source
of www.statistica.com.
Graph.1
Internet Penetration (www.statistica.com)
70,000,000
64,978,086
60,000,000
50,000,000 48,712,602
45,337,190
40,000,000 36,831,933
f(x) = 3711387.8 x + 1752130
R² = 0.21
30,000,000
19,489,364
20,000,000
10,000,000
4,359,057
0
242,640 511,052 645,251 540,454
m
re
sia
a
ia
os
i
d
ar
ne
ne
di
an
ys
na
nm
po
La
ne
u
bo
pi
ala
ail
et
Br
ga
do
ya
ilip
m
Th
Vi
M
Sin
M
Ca
In
Ph
From the second graph illustrate the Intelligence quotient or IQ of the ASEAN countries
and clearly shows that the Philippines ranks the lowest that marked as the dumbest in the entire
Southeast Asia and the source comes from world population review 2019.
Graph 2
Intelligence quotient
(world population review 2019)
Vietnam
f(x) = 0.72 x + 87.67
R² = 0.12
Thailand
Singapore
Philippines
Myanmar
Malaysia
Laos
Indonesia
Cambodia
Brunei
0 20 40 60 80 100 120
Here is the tabular illustration from the following above and from here it could compare
the difference between internet usage and IQ of the Southeast Asian countries.
Table.1
Intelligence quotient
Internet Penetration
ASEAN Countries (world population
(www.statistica.com)
review 2019)
1 Brunei 242,640 91
2 Cambodia 511,052 91
3 Indonesia 48,712,602 87
4 Laos 645,251 89
5 Malaysia 19,489,364 92
6 Myanmar 540,454 87
7 Philippines 64,978,086 86
8 Singapore 4,359,057 108
9 Thailand 36,831,933 91
10 Vietnam 45,337,190 94
B. Statistical Treatment
The tool that to be executed in this case paper is t-test: assuming unequal variance that it
applies it here as shows the two variables the internet penetration and IQ are both different
independent from each other and had big gap of difference in terms of number. The equation for
( ∑ D)/N
t=
the following data analysis is shown below:
√ ∑ D 2−(
(∑ D ) 2
N
( N −1 ) ( N )
)
N= is the total number of sample which in this case paper is 10
∑D= is the submission of X minus Y or the total of all the variables which X the internet
penetration and Y being IQ level.
∑D2= termed as the squared value of the submission of X minus Y.
Here the tabular illustration of the equation above to achieve the submission value and
terms of the said equation:
Table 2
Intelligence
Internet quotient
Penetration (world
t-Test: Two-Sample Assuming Unequal Variances
(www.statisti population
ca.com) review
2019)
X Y X-Y (X-Y)^2
1 242,640 91 242,549 58,829,823,362
2 511,052 91 510,961 261,080,941,180
3 48,712,602 87 48,712,515 2,372,909,141,007,230
4 645,251 89 645,162 416,233,941,728
5 19,489,364 92 19,489,272 379,831,721,920,628
6 540,454 87 540,367 291,996,710,836
7 64,978,086 86 64,978,000 4,222,140,433,966,940
8 4,359,057 108 4,358,949 19,000,437,143,058
9 36,831,933 91 36,831,842 1,356,584,576,125,990
10 45,337,190 94 45,337,096 2,055,452,257,391,860
221,646,7 10,406,946,70
∑d ∑ d 2
12 8,972,800
In the table 2 find the missing terms in the t equation that are needed to fill within in
order to find the t stats and compare it to the critical value and here is the illustration:
Equation 1
( ∑ D)/N
t=
√ ∑ D 2−(
(∑ D ) 2
N
( N −1 ) ( N )
)
221,646,712
10
t=
√ 10,406,946,708,972,800− ( 49,127,264,940,410,900
10 )
( 10−1 )( 6 )
t=¿2.836805219
In this next equation would find the degrees of freedom by just subtracting the total
number of sample which is ten minus one to plot the t value and with an the null hypotheses
were tested at 0.05 (5%) level of significance.
Equation 1
Decision Criterion:
df =k −1
¿ 10−1
=9
With the degrees of freedom of 9 in the t table and significance level for one tail the t
critical value is 1.833 and for the two tails operation is 2.262. See: www.ttable.org
In the equation above illustrated the t value and the next table would display the tabular
illustration of the function in the said equation, and here is the tabular description:
Table 3
t-Test: Two-Sample Assuming Unequal Variances
X Y
Mean 22164762.9 91.6
Variance 610468818895932 39.6
Observations 10 10
Hypothesized
Mean Difference 0
df 9
t Stat 2.836805446
P(T<=t) one-tail 0.009752285
t Critical one-tail 1.833112933
P(T<=t) two-tail 0.01950457
t Critical two-tail 2.262157163
The table above clearly illustrated that there are is significant difference between the
number of internet usage in the country and its IQ difference in the different country as
demonstrated that t value is lesser than t critical either one tail or two tail operation which
rejected the null hypothesis so it has to accept the alternative hypothesis.
Discussion
Philippines being the highest number of internet usage and lowest IQ seems clearly
illustrate in the significance in this case study as the P (T<=t) one-tail and two-tail 1.833 and
2.262 is smaller it means there is a significant difference between intelligence and internet usage.
