Proposições para Valorização de Resíduos Do Processamento Do Suco de Laranja
Proposições para Valorização de Resíduos Do Processamento Do Suco de Laranja
net/publication/285225926
CITATIONS READS
11 6,330
2 authors:
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
CHARACTERIZATION OF NANOFILTRATION AND REVERSE OSMOSIS MEMBRANES SUBMITTED TO n-HEXANE AND DENSE CO2 View project
All content following this page was uploaded by Silvia Benedetti on 07 December 2015.
Review
a b s t r a c t
The production of orange juice on an industrial level leads to a considerable quantity of solid and liquid residue
(around 8–20 million tons y−1 globally), which is still considered as waste or used as a complement in agriculture.
In general, orange residues have no economic value, even though their composition is rich in soluble sugars, cellu-
lose, hemicellulose, pectin and essential oils that could form the basis of several industrial processes. In this study,
information was collected on the technological potential of the solid and liquid residues generated in the processing
of orange juice. Possible applications include human consumption, fertilizer, animal feed, charcoal, adsorption of
chemical compounds, bio-oil production and extraction of essential oils and pectin. In this preliminary study, alter-
natives are proposed for the minimization and recovery of solid and liquid residues generated in the production
of orange juice with a view to the implantation of industrial plants which can reuse this material, in order to add
value to this solid and liquid waste and provide environmental benefits. The alternatives were proposed based on
information and data available in the literature and the concepts of clean technologies.
© 2012 The Institution of Chemical Engineers. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Contents
1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 607
2. Residue characterization: orange waste . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 607
3. Proposals for the use of orange waste . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 607
4. Case study . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 608
5. New products from orange waste: proposals and yields . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 608
5.1. Production of ingredients for animal feed – System 1. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 609
5.2. Bio-oil and charcoal production – System 2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 609
5.3. Essential oil extraction – System 3 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 609
5.4. Pectin production – System 4 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 610
5.5. Solid residue as adsorbent – System 5 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 610
5.6. Integrated process for production of ethanol, biogas and limonene – System 6 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 612
5.7. Benefits of the proposed systems . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 612
6. Final considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 612
Acknowledgments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 612
References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 612
∗
Corresponding author. Tel.: +55 48 3721 5371; fax: +55 48 3721 9687.
E-mail address: [email protected] (E.R. Amante).
Received 2 March 2012; Received in revised form 28 May 2012; Accepted 17 June 2012
0960-3085/$ – see front matter © 2012 The Institution of Chemical Engineers. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fbp.2012.06.002
food and bioproducts processing 9 0 ( 2 0 1 2 ) 606–614 607
1. Introduction Orange
extraction reveals higher methane production, providing an microwave. Farhat et al. (2011) studied a new process for the
excellent opportunity to integrate this waste into orange juice extraction of essential oil from orange peel called microwave
manufacturing using a biorefinery approach. steam diffusion and concluded that it is an efficient method
Agroindustrial residues, such as those generated in citric for the extraction of essential oil from orange peel, providing
juice production plants, have also been used as a substrate for good yields.
the production of enzymes. Nighojkar et al. (2006) studied the The application of alternative materials in the adsorp-
use of orange peel as a substrate and inducer in the production tion of chemical compounds and toxic metals present in
of polygalacturonase by microorganisms and concluded that industrial effluents, particularly in research laboratories, are
orange peel is a very good inducer. Mamma et al. (2008) con- scarce; however, some studies have shown that this strat-
cluded that it is possible to produce pectinolytic, cellulolytic egy has potential. As an example, it has been demonstrated
and xylanolytic enzymes from the fungal strains of the genera that orange pulp is effective for removing heavy metals from
Aspergillus, Fusarium, Neurospora and Penicillium and generate industrial effluents. According to Ajmal et al. (2001), the use of
multienzyme activity using a simple growth medium con- orange bagasse as an alternative adsorbent is effective in the
sisting of a solid by-product of the citrus processing industry removal of Ni from electroplating effluent, where more than
(orange peel). 93% of the metal was adsorbed. Pérez-Marín et al. (2008) eval-
These residues also have high energy value, and they can uated the use of orange waste in the biosorption of cadmium,
help to reduce the dependency on energy purchased for the zinc and lead and obtained good results. Biswas et al. (2008)
generation of heat, vapor, or electricity. Despite the great studied the removal and recovery of phosphorus from water
opportunities for the use of such residues, there are few exam- by means of adsorption onto an orange waste gel loaded with
ples in the literature of the application of residues from the zirconium and concluded that it is a promising and potentially
orange agro-industry for energy generating purposes, either attractive adsorbent for treating wastewater contaminated
in the form in which they are produced or after their trans- with inorganic phosphate and consequently provides a step
formation (Widmer et al., 2010). Before they are used in the towards a sustainable society.
generation of thermal energy, the solid residues from oranges The bran of citric pulp, or orange peel bran, is another
can be converted into charcoal and into the by-products of very important by-product. This bran is obtained through the
carbonization, which would widen their range of uses and treatment of solid residues and liquid remaining after juice
at the same time facilitate their transportation, storage, and extraction. The pelletized bran of citric pulp is used as a com-
handling. According to Tienne et al. (2004), the pyrolysis of plement in animal feed, and is well accepted as an ingredient
orange peel is possible based on the gravimetric income asso- in bovine feed (Corazza et al., 2001). The use of industrial
ciated with the coal and carbon obtained and concluded that residues derived from citric fruits in animal diets reflects the
the charcoal production and utilization of the by-products importance of fibers in the maintenance of the ruminal motil-
from the pyrolysis of peel and orange pulp allow value to ity and also to motivate rumination. However, this fiber needs
be added to this agroindustrial residue. In addition, the pulp to be in the appropriate condition. It has been emphatically
fruit can be used for bio-oil production also employing pyrol- stated that the use of fiber in human nutrition is correlated
ysis (Özbay et al., 2008). According to Embrapa (2009), orange with the prevention of diseases (Mendonça et al., 2006).
waste is a good biomass for bio-oil production, yielding up
to 60 g 100 g−1 by weight compared to the raw material used, 4. Case study
i.e., a ton of solid residue can yield up to 600 kg of bio-oil
(Embrapa, 2009).
The quantitative data on the residues generated by the orange
The citrus processing waste can be used to produce
processing industry were obtained from the literature and
ethanol, limonene, and other co-products. Extensive work has
from information supplied by a local orange juice production
been carried out with enzymatic hydrolysis to liquefy this
plant. The proposals to increase the value of the orange waste
residue and maximize the monomeric sugar content. These
will be presented as flowcharts, mass balances and yields for
sugars can be subsequently or simultaneously (Wilkins et al.,
each system, based on calculations and production data relat-
2007a,b) converted into ethanol by fermentation. Widmer et al.
ing to a large orange juice plant with a daily processing rate of
(2010) studied the use of citrus processing waste for ethanol
approximately 16,000 t. This production will be considered to
production by saccharification and fermentation processes
estimate both the amount of solid and liquid waste processed
and observed that the ethanol yields based on the sugar
and the derivatives produced.
content after enzymatic hydrolysis following 48 h of simul-
taneous saccharification and fermentation ranged from 76%
to 94%.
5. New products from orange waste:
Another quite profitable alternative for the residues gen-
proposals and yields
erated during orange processing is the extraction of essential
oils, that is, volatile oils extracted from the citric fruit peel The characteristics of solid and liquid orange residues suggest
(Donsì et al., 2011). These essential oils have several applica- that these waste materials can be used for the development
tions in the pharmaceutical and food industries. d-Limonene of new products. This paper proposes six products which
is an oily fraction and it is considered to be one of the purest can be obtained from the solid fraction and four from the
sources of monocyclic terpene (Corazza et al., 2001; Viuda- liquid fraction of the orange waste. The company under
Martos et al., 2008). Also, these oils can contain compounds study produces 8000 t day−1 of pasteurized and concentrated
with biological activity, such as limonoids and their gluco- juice, using 16,000 t day−1 of oranges, with the generation of
sides, which cause the inhibition of cancerous tumors induced 8000 t day−1 of orange waste (considering 50% of the raw mate-
in rats, mice, and hamsters (Reda et al., 2005). Various tech- rial).
niques can be used for the extraction of essential oil, such The alternatives are presented as systems for the use of
as supercritical extraction, hydrodistillation, distillation and residues from the orange juice industry.
food and bioproducts processing 9 0 ( 2 0 1 2 ) 606–614 609
8,000 t Solid and liquid waste Solid residues 8,000 t Orange waste
Extraction Drying
Wet milling
12.8 t Essential oils
Dry milling
Drying
2011). The liquid residues remaining after the essential oil 5.4. Pectin production – System 4
extraction can be used in combination with the fibers, as
a substrate for the production of enzymes for semi-solid Pectin is a soluble fiber that can be obtained from the
fermentation. residues of orange processing. It is a natural food additive
The production of essential oils from orange peel is eco- used extensively in the food industry. The world market
nomically viable, since this by-product has high added value demand for pectin is in excess of 30,000 t annually and is
(Anagnostopoulou et al., 2006). Citrus essential oils are used growing by around 4–5 g 100 g−1 y−1 (Partos, 2006; Yeoh et al.,
in a wide variety of applications in the food and pharma- 2008).
ceutical industries. They can be used directly as flavorings The industrial process employs extraction of pectin acid
in foods and beverages as well as in the production of or hydrochloric sulfuric acid, which generates toxic waste
medicines, cosmetics, and cleaning products (Raeissi et al., (Kimball, 1991). Hot water extraction can be considered as an
2008). alternative procedure for the extraction of pectin from orange
The maximum extraction yield for citrus oils is 0.4 g 100 g−1 , pulp (Soler, 1995). The idea is to use a process that generates
i.e., for every ton of fruit processed 4 kg of oil are produced nontoxic waste which can then be utilized. The production of
(Bizzo, 2009). Thus, from the total amount of solid residues pectin from the residues of oranges processed to juice has a
generated in the production of juice (8000 t) and considering yield of approximately 25 g 100 g−1 (on a dry basis) (Kar and
an extraction process with 40% efficiency, approximately 12.8 t Arslan, 1999). Considering that 8000 t of residues are gener-
of essential oils can be obtained. ated daily and that these residues are submitted to drying
Among the many sources of dietary fiber, citrus by- until reaching 10 g 100 g−1 moisture and that the yield in the
products have a high potential for use. There has been much pectin extraction is around 19 g 100 g−1 (Calliari and Gómez,
interest in the use of the fibers from the peel and dehydrated 2004), approximately 342 t of pectin can be obtained. The
membranes. The washed pulp has been demonstrated to be a remaining solid residue could be used to make compost. The
good source of soluble and insoluble dietary fiber and its spe- proposed process to obtain pectin from orange waste is shown
cific technological functions and functional properties allow in Fig. 5.
its use as an ingredient in foods (Martí et al., 2011). Consid-
ering the solid residue is approximately 70 g 100 g−1 fiber (on 5.5. Solid residue as adsorbent – System 5
a dry basis) and after drying the fiber shows 7 g 100 g−1 mois-
ture (on a dry basis), the fiber yield is 5200 t. Bortoluzzi and Adsorption is a technique which has been used successfully
Marangoni (2006) described a similar process, but the fiber for the effective removal of heavy metals and chemical com-
was obtained directly from the dry residue after juice extrac- pounds from wastewaters generated by the chemical and
tion, and obtained yields of 47.9 g 100 g−1 from 20.7 g 100 g−1 textile industries. The first step to an efficient adsorption
insoluble fiber and soluble fiber (Bortoluzzi and Marangoni, process is the choice of an adsorbent with high selectivity,
2006). high capacity and long life. This should also be avail-
Garau et al. (2007) studied the antioxidant capacity of able in large quantities at low cost (Pérez-Marín et al.,
the dietary fiber of orange by-products and it exhibited 2008). According to Ströher (2010), these low-cost adsor-
high antioxidant capacity. Garcia et al. (2002) showed that bents have been investigated in laboratory scale to treat
the addition of cereal or fruit fiber, specifically 1.5 g 100 g−1 wastewater with varying degrees of efficiency. An example
orange fiber, to dry fermented sausages gives organoleptic of this class of adsorbents is orange pulp, which has natural
characteristic similar to those of a conventional high fat adsorption characteristics which resemble those of activated
product. carbon.
In this context, the flowchart in Fig. 4 shows the alterna- Another alternative for the removal and recovery of chem-
tives proposed in this system and the processes used. ical compounds from water is by means of adsorption onto
Table 1 – Systems for the processing of residues generated by the orange juice industry.
Systems Original Original Operations involved
solid liquid
residue residue
Press- Mill- Dry- Pyro- Com- Gas liquid Siev- Pellet- Wash- Fermen- Filtr- Extrac- Distill- Hydro-
1 x x x x x
2 x x x x x x
3 x x x x x x
4 x x x x x x x
5 x x x x
6 x x x x x x x
Ingredient for Charcoal Fiber Bio-oil Adsorbent Essential oils Biogas Ethanol Pectin
animal feed or
compost
1 x L M L
2 x x H H M
3 x x H H H
4 x x H H H
5 x x M H L
6 x x x x H H H
Economic benefit: Low: L < cost of the conventional treatment of residues; Medium: M ≤ 5 × cost of the conventional treatment of residues; High: H > 5 × cost of the conventional treatment of residues.
Environmental benefit: Low: L − environmental evaluation parameters are reduced by up to 60%; Medium: M − environmental evaluation parameters are reduced by 60–90%; High: H − environmental evaluation
parameters are reduced over 90%.
Investment involved: Low: L − investment in the installation of the system of up to US$ 500,000; Medium: M − investment in the installation of the system of US$ 500,000–1,000,000; High: H − investment in the
installation of the system of over US$ 1,000,000.
611
612 food and bioproducts processing 9 0 ( 2 0 1 2 ) 606–614
344,000 m3
Adsorbent compounds Ethanol 317,200 L
Brasileiro de Ciência e Tecnologia de Alimentos, Recife – PE, Aspergillus niger using orange peel as inducer. Process
ANAIS. Biochem. 41, 1136–1140.
Chau, C.F., Huang, Y.A., 2003. Comparison of the chemical Özbay, N., Apaydın-Varol, E., Uzun, B.B., Pütün, A.E., 2008.
composition and physicochemical properties of different Characterization of bio-oil obtained from fruit pulp pyrolysis.
fibers prepared from the peel of Citrus sinensis L. Cv. Liucheng. J. Energy 33, 1233–1240.
Agric. Food Chem. 51, 2615–2618. Partos, L., 2006. A first, pectin ingredient enters Cargill’s portfolio.
Corazza, M.L., Rodrigues, D.G., Nozaki, J., 2001. Preparação e Available from:
caracterização do vinho de laranja. Quim. Nova 24, 449–452. http://www.dairyreporter.com/news/ng.asp?id=61305
Crupi, F., Dugo, P., Di Giacomo, G., Rispoli, G., Di Giacomo, A., (accessed 22.08.10).
2001. Sulla produzione del succo di arancia in Italia. Parte I. Pereira, C.L.F., 2008. Avaliação da sustentabilidade ampliada de
Essenze Derivati Agr. 71, 121–132. produtos agroindustriais. Estudo de caso: suco de laranja e
Donsì, F., Annunziata, M., Sessa, M., Ferrari, G., 2011. etanol. Dissertação de mestrado. Universidade Estadual de
Nanoencapsulation of essential oils to enhance their Campinas – UNICAMP, Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil.
antimicrobial activity in foods. LWT-Food Sci. Technol. 44, Pérez-Marín, A.B., Ballester, A., González, F., Blázquez, M.L.,
1908–1914. Muñoz, J.A., Sáez, J., Zapata, V.M., 2008. Study of cadmium,
Embrapa-Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária, 2009. zinc and lead biosorption by orange wastes using the
Relatório de Atividades 2009. Available from: subsequent addition method. Bioresour. Technol. 99,
http://www.cnpae.embrapa.br/publicacoes-para- 8101–8106.
download/relatorio-de-atividades-2009/ (accessed Pourbafrani, M., Forgács, G., Horváth, I.S., Niklasson, C.,
20.10.11). Taherzadeh, M.J., 2010. Production of biofuels, limonene and
Faostat, 2010. World census of agriculture. Available from: pectin from citrus wastes. Bioresour. Technol. 101, 4246–4250.
http://faostat.fao.org/ (accessed 07.08.10). Raeissi, S., Diaz, S., Espinosa, S., Peters, C.J., Brignole, E.A., 2008.
Farhat, A., Fabiano-Tixier, A.S., El Maataoui, M., Maingonnat, J.F., Ethane as an alternative solvent for supercritical extraction of
Romdhane, M., Chemat, F., 2011. Microwave steam diffusion orange peel oils. J. Supercrit. Fluids 45, 306–313.
for extraction of essential oil from orange peel: kinetic data, Reda, S.Y., Leal, E.S., Batista, E.A.C., Barana, A.C., Schnitzel, E.,
extract’s global yield and mechanism. Food Chem. 125, Carneiro, P.I.B., 2005. Caracterização dos óleos das sementes
255–261. de limão rosa (Citrus limonia Osbeck) e limão siciliano (Citrus
Garau, M.C., Simal, S., Rossello, C., Femenia, A., 2007. Effect of limonon), um resíduo agroindustrial. Ciência Tecnol. Aliment.
air-drying temperature on physico-chemical properties of 25, 672–676.
dietary fibre and antioxidant capacity of Orange (Citrus Rivas, B., Torrado, A., Torre, P., Converti, A., Domínguez, J.M., 2008.
aurantium v. Canoneta) by-products. Food Chem. 104, Submerged citric acid fermentation on orange peel
1014–1024. autohydrolysate. J. Agric. Food Chem. 56, 2380–2387.
Garcia, M.L., Dominguez, R., Galvez, M., Gavlez, D., Casas, C., Roussos, P.A., 2011. Phytochemicals and antioxidant capacity of
Selgas, M.D., 2002. Utilisation of cereal and fruit fibres in low orange (Citrus sinensis (l.) Osbeck cv. Salustiana) juice
fat dry fermented sausage. Meat Sci. 60, 227–236. produced under organic and integrated farming system in
Garcia-Castello, E.M., Mayor, L., Chorques, S., Argüelles, A., Greece. Sci. Hortic. 129, 253–258.
Vidal-Brotóns, D., Gras, M.L., 2011. Reverse osmosis Rutkowski, R., 2011. Pyrolysis of cellulose, xylan and lignin with
concentration of press liquid from orange juice solid wastes: the K2 CO3 and ZnCl2 addition for bio-oil production. Fuel
flux decline mechanisms. J. Food Eng. 106, 199–205. Process. Technol. 92, 517–522.
Grohmann, K., Cameron, R.G., Buslig, B.S., 1995. Fractionation Siles, J.A., Li, Q., Thompson, I., 2010. Biorefinery of waste orange
and pretreatment of orange peel by dilute acid hydrolysis. peel. Crit. Rev. Biotechnol. 30 (1), 63–69.
Bioresour. Technol. 54, 129–141. Soler, M.P., 1995. Frutas–compotas, doces em massa, geléias e
Haykiri-Acma, H., Yaman, S., Kucukbayrak, S., 2010. Comparison frutas cristalizadas—manual para a micro e pequena
of the thermal reactivities of isolated lignin and holocellulose empresa. ITAL, Campinas.
during pyrolysis. Fuel Process. Technol. 91, 759–764. Ströher, A.P., 2010. Tratamento por adsorção em bagaço de laranja
Kar, F., Arslan, N., 1999. Effect of temperature and concentration de um efluente da indústria têxtil. Dissertação de mestrado.
on viscosity of orange peel pectin solutions and intrinsic Universidade Estadual de Maringá – UEM, Maringá, PR, Brazil.
viscosity–molecular weight relationship. Carbohydr. Polym. Tavares, V.B., Siviéri, K., Ceron, C.R., Silva, R., Trabuco, E., 1998.
40, 277–284. Utilização de resíduo líquido de indústria de processamento
Kimball, D., 1991. Citrus Processing—Quality Control and de suco de laranja como meio de cultura de Penicillium
Technology. Van Nostrand Reinold, New York. citrinum: depuração biológica do resíduo e produção de
Mamma, D., Kourtoglou, E., Christakopoulos, P., 2008. Fungal enzima. Quim. Nova 21, 722–725.
multienzyme production on industrial by-products of the Teixeira, J.C., 2001. Utilização da polpa cítrica na alimentação de
citrus-processing industry. Bioresour. Technol. 99, 2373–2383. bovinos leiteiros Parte I. Milkbizz Tecnol. 1 (3), 25–28.
Martí, N., Saura, D., Fuentes, E., Lizamac, V., García, E., Tienne, L., Deschamps, M.C., Andrade, A.M., 2004. Produção de
Mico-Ballestera, M.J., Lorentea, J., 2011. Fiber from tangerine carvão e subprodutos da pirólise da casca e do bagaço de
juice industry. Ind. Crops Prod. 33, 94–98. laranja (Citrus sinensis). Rev. Biomassa Energia 1,
Martín, M.A., Siles, J.A., Chica, A.F., Martín, A., 2010. 191–197.
Biomethanization of orange peel waste. Bioresour. Technol. Tripodo, M.M., Lanuzza, F., Micali, G., Coppolino, R., Nucita, F.,
101, 8993–8999. 2004. Citrus waste recovery: a new environmentally friendly
Melèndez-Martínez, A.J., Britton, G., Vicario, I.M., Heredia, F.J., procedure to obtain animal feed. Bioresour. Technol. 91,
2008. The complex carotenoid pattern of orange juices from 111–115.
concentrate. Food Chem. 109, 546–553. Usda, 2010. Education and research. http://www.usda.gov.
Mendonça, L.M.V., Conceição, A., Piedade, J., Carvalho, V.D., Available from: http://faostat.fao.org/ (accessed 07.08.10).
Theodoro, V.C.A., 2006. Caracterização da composição química Viuda-Martos, M., Ruiz-Navajas, Y., Fernández-López, J.,
e do rendimento dos resíduos industriais do limão Tahiti Pérez-Álvarez, J., 2008. Antifungal activity of lemon (Citrus
(Citrus latifolia Tanaka). Ciência Tecnol. Aliment. 26, 870–874. lemon L.), mandarin (Citrus reticulata L.), grapefruit (Citrus
Moreira, O.S., Reis, R.B., Lana, A.M.Q., 2004. Produção e paradisi L.) and orange (Citrus sinensis L.) essential oils. Food
Composição do Leite de Vacas Alimentadas com Polpa Cítrica Control 19, 1130–1138.
em Substituição ao Milho. Anais da Reunião anual da Widmer, W., Zhou, W., Grohmann, K., 2010. Pretreatment effects
Sociedade Brasileira de Zootecnia 41, CD-ROM. on orange processing waste for making ethanol by
Nighojkar, S., Phanse, Y., Sinha, D., Nighojkar, A., Kumar, A., 2006. simultaneous saccharification and fermentation. Bioresour.
Production of polygalacturonase by immobilized cells of Technol. 101, 5242–5249.
614 food and bioproducts processing 9 0 ( 2 0 1 2 ) 606–614
Wilkins, M.R., Suryawati, L., Maness, N.O., Chrz, D., 2007a. Yasar, F., Togrul, H., Arslan, N., 2007. Flow properties of cellulose
Ethanol production by Saccharomyces cerevisiae and and carboxymethyl cellulose from orange peel. J. Food Eng. 81,
Kluyveromyces marxianus in the presence of orange-peel oil. 187–199.
World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 23, 1161–1168. Yeoh, S., Shi, J., Langrish, T.A.G., 2008. Comparisons between
Wilkins, M.R., Widmer, W.W., Grohmann, K., 2007b. Simultaneous different techniques for water-based extraction of
saccharification and fermentation of citrus peel waste by pectin from orange peels. Desalination 218, 229–237.
Saccharomyces cerevisiae to produce ethanol. Process Biochem.
42, 1614–1619.