0% found this document useful (0 votes)
178 views5 pages

RCC Status of COS As On 5-5-2020

The document discusses a claim submitted by an EPC contractor for reconstruction work on NH-58 in Uttarakhand. The Authority's Engineer requested additional documents and information in their first letter, including a geotechnical report, design calculations, bearing designs, supporting quotations, and a work program. In their response, the EPC contractor provided the requested documents and drawings. The Authority's Engineer then requested a joint verification of quantities to avoid any disputes over the cost estimate.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as XLS, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
178 views5 pages

RCC Status of COS As On 5-5-2020

The document discusses a claim submitted by an EPC contractor for reconstruction work on NH-58 in Uttarakhand. The Authority's Engineer requested additional documents and information in their first letter, including a geotechnical report, design calculations, bearing designs, supporting quotations, and a work program. In their response, the EPC contractor provided the requested documents and drawings. The Authority's Engineer then requested a joint verification of quantities to avoid any disputes over the cost estimate.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as XLS, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 5

Reconstruction with geometric improvement of existing single/ Intermediate lane to 2 Lane with Paved Shoulder Configuration from Existing

Km 338.100 (Design Km 333.410) to Km 368.000 (Design Km 360.579) excluding existing


Km 349.800 to km 355.495 (Kaliyasaur bypass) of NH-58 in the State of Uttarakhand under EPC mode

Authority's Engineer
Contractor letter Amount claim by EPC Contarctor Authority's Engineer observations
Detail of COS Proposed structure Contractor submission letter no
no
Total Amount claimed
Per unit amount

i. You are instructed to submit the Geo-


tech investigation report which should
confirm clause 7.6.2 of IRC:SP:73-2015.
ii. You are instructed to submit the design
calculation report duly vetted with
requirement of EPC contract agreement.
iii. You are also advised to submit the
Contractor design and drawing of bearings along with
letter no RCC- 980012/3- your submission.
iv. You are advice to attach the 3 no
HECI/2018- EPC contractor submit the drawing & design with his letter. proj/Contractor/RCC/ quotation supporting the rates in your
19/49 dated 92 cost estimate for the items are not
02.03.2020 included in the schedule of rates as per
article 13.2.3.
v. Submit work program along with the
submission.
vi. Submit the detail measurement of
reinforcement/BBS along with your
proposal.

Narkota
Bridge due re- Steel structure
821441211 7823249.6
allignment of bridge
RVNL
Authority's Engineer
Contractor letter Amount claim by EPC Contarctor Authority's Engineer observations
Detail of COS Proposed structure Contractor submission letter no
no
Total Amount claimed
Per unit amount
980012/3- After non compliance of EPC contractor in
Narkota proj/Authority/RCC/99 this regard Authority's Engineer write
Bridge due re- Steel structure dated 06-04-2020 letter with same observation to Authority.
821441211 7823249.6
allignment of bridge
RVNL

Geo technical /Bore log / Soil investigation report Submitted through After submission of required quotation &
ref. no 5 supporting documents for COS EPC
RCC/AE/SK- II) All design and drawing duly vetted as per EPC agreement. 980012/3- Contractor is ask to assign an Authorized
RP/2020/16 III) POT – PTEF bearing consists of a metal piston supported by disc or proj/Authority/RCC/113 person for joint verification of quantities
dated unreinforced elastomer confined in a metal cylinder , sealing rings , 04-05-2020 taken in estimate due to which is not
01.05.2020 dust seals PTEF surface sliding against stainless steel mating surface matching with our quantities to avoid any
complete assembly to be cast steel /fabricated structural steel , doubt.
metal ,elastomer elements to be as per IRC 83 part I &II respectively
and other parts conforming to BS : 5400, section 9.1 &9.2. drawing.
Capacity 310 tonnes. dimensions like height etc are presented in
subjected drawing. shown
IV) Quotations of bearings in three no. have been submitted through
ref 7, we have not numerous options for cable suspension system. For
all other item of works jhakroli Block of Rudra Prayag District SOR rate
have been followed.
V) Work program /. Schedule of execution has been submitted.
Financial progress Chart / Payment schedule will be the part of post
approval work with mutual consent.
VI) BBS is the part of site execution , it will get relevance after approval
.
Authority's Engineer
Contractor letter Amount claim by EPC Contarctor Authority's Engineer observations
Detail of COS Proposed structure Contractor submission letter no
no
Total Amount claimed
Per unit amount
i. No typical drawing of pile & pile cap
along with reinforcement detail is attached
with the submission.
ii. No typical drawing is provided showing
the arrangement of fixing geotextile.
iii. You are instructed to submit the
separate drawings for the material & type
of material fill between LBL to bottom of
pile-cap. Also, get consent with designer
that this loose material should resist the
eddy’s form at the time of monsoon.
iv. You are instructed to adopt rate of
Contractor letter prevailing year SOR of nearby block /
no RCC-AE-SK- division i.e., Kirtinagar instead of Jakholi
Hill side 980012/3-
RP-2020-08 block.
Protection 657735.4643 EPC contractor submit the drawing & design with his letter. proj/Contractor/RCC/108
dated 30.03.2020 v. Work program along with Cash flow
92082965 15-04-2020
(mailed on chart.
13.04.2020) vi. Payment procedure, if the said proposal
is accepted by competent Authority.
vii. He was advise for taking the rate of
pile from SOR instead of taking quotation,
the rate in taken in quotation is almost 3
times more then the rate provided in SOR.
viii. In Rate estimate of Hill side protection
works, contractor has taken the rate from
In valley side the tender documents of Imphal project ,
i. Pile & pile cap he was advised to resubmit the estimate
along with with supporting minimum 3 No’s fresh
gabion structure. quotation for your said project.
Farasu In Hill side
landslide i. Special
treatment protection work
with anchor bolt
& wire mesh
along with
shortcreting.
In valley side
i. Pile & pile cap
along with Authority's Engineer
Contractor letter gabion structure. Amount claim by EPC Contarctor letter no
Authority's Engineer observations
Detail of COS Proposed structure Contractor submission
Farasu no In Hill side Total Amount claimed
Per unit amount
landslide i. Special cap has been attached with this compliance as additional drawings
treatment protection work Compliance of Observation No:2
with anchor bolt Arrangement of fixing Geotextile: Geotextile will be fixed at the 10mm
& wire mesh Dia Nail protruded at top of pie cap. During the casting of pile cap 10
along with mm Dia reinforced bar will be installed at top toward
shortcreting. hill side of pile cap and same will be used for fixing the geotextile. The
spacing of 10mm dia barwill be kept at every 250 mm so that sufficient
numbers of bar will be available for the fixing of
geotextile. A typical detail of same has been mentioned in attached
drawings.
Compliance of Observation No:3
Following are properties of aggregate material fill between LBL to
bottom of pile-cap: i. Again EPC Contractor was advise to
Contractor Source of Aggregates: Geologically aggregates may be obtained from adopt rate from either by rate analysis or
RCC/AE/SK- basalt, granite, limestone, quartzite, gabbro or schist rock etc. Main by Quotation by vendors and replace it
valley side 980012/3-
RP/2020/15 resources are quartzite or sedimentary (limestone) rock. with the rate taken from tender documents
Protection 628607.21 proj/Contractor/RCC/112
dated 01.05.2020 Texture of Aggregates: Aggregates shall be rounded type to the extent of projects from other state.
62,860,721 04-05-2020
(mailed on so that there will bearing strength against flow of water and eddy ii. After discussion with Authority he was
1.05.2020) current will be more. again instructed to consider rate of pile
Texture of Aggregates: Shape of aggregate shall be rounded. from SOR.
Size of aggregates: The nominal maximum size of coarse aggregate
should be as large as possible within the limits specified, but in no case
greater than 1/4th of the min. thickness of the member.
Grading of aggregates: Aggregate used shall be 20mm to 150mm. So, in
no case aggregate shall be pass with sieve of size 20mm.
Compressive Strength of Aggregates: Compressive strength of
Aggregate shall be in between 20MPa to 50 MPa Specific Gravity of
Aggregates: Specific gravity of fill material shall be in the range of
2.3Kg/cm 3 to 2.5Kg/cm3
In valley side, the piles, we are going to bore in reservoir not for bridge
kindly understand thedifference in the scenario which can not be
justified with the rate of piles of bridge.
Authority's Engineer
Contractor letter Amount claim by EPC Contarctor Authority's Engineer observations
Detail of COS Proposed structure Contractor submission letter no
no
Total Amount claimed
Per unit amount

i. As per EPC Contract agreement the


proposal should be signed with Design
director, safety consultant and proof
consultant; in your submission even no
signature of your Project manager is
marked.
ii. No typical drawing/detail of gabion
mattress is attached with the submission.
iii. No plantation work is showing in your
typical drawing instead of that you have
taken cost of plantation in your estimate
while there is no need of plantation when
Contractor
980012/3- we are doing hydro seeding there.
proposal mailed
Dumping zone Gabion structure 77904039 152753.0176 EPC Contractor submit the proposal with his letter. proj/Contractor/RCC/110 iv. No Vendor Quotation is attached with
on 19.04.2020
27-04-2020 your submission; you are instructed to
without any letter
attach the same along with your
resubmission.
v. You are instructed to adopt rate of
prevailing year SOR of nearby
block/division i.e., Kirtinagar instead of
Jakholi block.
vi. Work program along with Cash flow
chart.
vii. Payment procedure, if the said
proposal is accepted by competent
Authority.

You might also like