Scribd
Upload
18 views2 pages

Uploads PDF 196 SP 158173 08242020

The resolution denies the Motion for Reconsideration filed by petitioner Candido Rigor Guiam III regarding the Supreme Court's earlier decision denying his petition for review. The Court found that the Motion for Reconsideration did not present any new matters or compelling reasons to reverse or modify the previous decision. Therefore, the Motion for Reconsideration was denied.

Uploaded by

Brian del Mundo
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
18 views2 pages

Uploads PDF 196 SP 158173 08242020

The resolution denies the Motion for Reconsideration filed by petitioner Candido Rigor Guiam III regarding the Supreme Court's earlier decision denying his petition for review. The Court found that the Motion for Reconsideration did not present any new matters or compelling reasons to reverse or modify the previous decision. Therefore, the Motion for Reconsideration was denied.

Uploaded by

Brian del Mundo
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

Republic of the Philippines

Manila

FORMER SPECIAL EIGHTH DIVISION

CANDIDO RIGOR GUIAM CA-G.R. SP No. 158173


III, Municipal Vice-Mayor,
Victoria, Tarlac,
Petitioner, Members:

GARCIA, R. R.,
Chairperson,
*
ROBENIOL, G. T., and
-versus- PAYOYO-VILLORDON, T.M.B., JJ.

Promulgated:
ELISEO M. MADRID,
Respondent.
August 24, 2020
x--------------------------------------------------x

RESOLUTION

GARCIA, R. R., J.:

This refers to the Motion for Reconsideration 1 filed by


petitioner Candido Rigor Guiam III of our Decision2 dated August 30,
2019 denying the petition for review.

After going over the grounds raised in the Motion for


Reconsideration and the Comment3 filed by respondent Eliseo M.
Madrid, We resolve to deny the motion.

Petitioner failed to show any compelling reason that would


warrant a reversal or modification of the aforementioned Decision. A

*
Vice Justice Louis P. Acosta who is on leave for Justice Victoria Isabel A. Paredes who is on
leave of absence (Wellness Program), per Raffle dated August 27, 2019.
1
Rollo, pp. 313-324.
2
Rollo, pp. 300-312.
3
Rollo, pp. 330-336.
CA-G.R. SP No. 158173 Page 2 of 2
Resolution

perusal of the Motion for Reconsideration shows that no new matters


were alleged therein that have not been considered, passed upon and
discussed in the decision sought to be reconsidered.

WHEREFORE, premises considered, the instant Motion for


Reconsideration is hereby DENIED.

SO ORDERED.

RAMON R. GARCIA
Associate Justice

WE CONCUR:

GABRIEL T. ROBENIOL TITA MARILYN B. PAYOYO-VILLORDON


Associate Justice Associate Justice

You might also like