Case Study - Bharat Engineering Works Limited
Case Study - Bharat Engineering Works Limited
Bharat Engineering Works Limited is a major industrial machineries besides other engineering
products. It has enjoyed market preference for its machineries because of limited competition in
the field. Usually there have been more orders than what the company could supply. However,
the scenario changed quickly because of the entry of two new competitors in the field with
foreign technological collaboration. For the first time, the company faced problem in marketing
its products with usual profit margin. Sensing the likely problem, the chief executive appointed
Mr. Arvind Kumar as general manager to direct the operations of industrial machinery division.
Mr.Kumar had similar assignment abroad before coming back to India.
Mr. Kumar had a discussion with the chief executive about the nature of the problem being
faced by the company so that he could fix up his priority. The chief executive advised him to
consult various heads of department to have first-hand information. However, he emphasised
that the company lacked an integrated planning system while members of the Board of
Directors insisted on introducing this in several meetings both formally and informally.
After joining as General Manager, Mr Kumar got briefings from the heads of all departments.
He asked all heads to identify major problems and issues concerning them. The marketing
manager indicated that in order to achieve higher sales, he needed more sales support. Sales
people had no central organisation to provide sales support nor was there a generous budget for
demonstration teams which could be sent to customers to win business.
The production manager complained about the old machines and equipment’s used in
manufacturing. Therefore, cost of production was high but without corresponding quality.
While competitors had better equipment’s and machinery, Bharat Engineering had neither
replaced its age-old plant nor reconditioned it. Therefore to reduce the cost, it was essential to
automate production lines by installing new equipment.
Director of research and development did not have specific problem and therefore, did not
indicate for any change. However, a principal scientist in R&D indicated on one day that the
director of R&D, though very nice in his approach, did not emphasize on short-term research
projects, which could easily increase production efficiency by at least 20 per cent within a very
short period without any major capital outlay.
Questions
(a) Discuss the nature and characteristics of the problems in this case.
Ans. Here are the problems that hinders the growth of the company.
1. Previously the company had limited competition. So, they had huge market share to
themselves for machinery but after the entry of two new competitors which had foreign
collaboration the company faced marketing problems and profits dipped.
2. There were no integrated systems of planning which made it difficult to coordinate with
other departments.
3. Old machinery is still operational and hence manufacturing cost is higher.
4. Poor technical support as there is no proper department and the engineers are spread.
5. The research and development department focusses mainly on long term projects and
not on the current products working efficiently.
6. Jobs were outsourced from outside at higher costs and their work done was substandard.
7. The competitors had advantage as they had better equipment’s and machinery.
8. Their products faced quality concerns as machinery to manufacture products was old
and obsolete.